There are errors in Table 3 that were introduced during the typesetting process. Please view the corrected Table 3 here. The publisher apologizes for these errors.
Table 3. Cross-Validation Results.
| 15 repetitions | z = 4, ThC = 13 | z = 4, no ThC |
| NRMSE (%) | 5.6 ± 1.1 | 7.4 ± 1.4 |
| (s) | 8.1 ± 1.2 | 6.9 ± 0.1 |
| (s) | 9.9 ± 0.6 | 7.9 ± 0.2 |
| Ep95 (s) | 17.6 ± 2.7 | 14.9 ± 0.2 |
| CR (%) | 100 | 100 |
Comparison of normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), median efficiency (), mean efficiency (), 95th percentile efficiency (Ep95) and completion rate (CR) for the optimal parameters z = 4 ThC = 13 and z = 4 without ThC (mean ± standard deviation).
Reference
- 1. Karlen W, Gan H, Chiu M, Dunsmuir D, Zhou G, et al. (2014) Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Respiratory Rate Measurements in Children Using Mobile Devices. PLoS ONE 9(6): e99266 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
