Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 1;25(2):188–197. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0262

Table 2.

Comparison in Linear Regression Analyses Between All Participants with 3,5-T2 Serum Concentrations >0.2 nM (Whole) and a Euthyroid Subpopulation

    Whole Euthyroid
Characteristics Log-scale N βlin [95% CI]* p βspline [95% CI]** p N βlin [95% CI]* p βspline [95% CI]** p
TSH, mIU/L Yes 573 −0.56 [−1.02, −0.11] 0.02 1.30 [0.11, 2.49] 0.03 487 −0.10 [−0.26, 0.06] 0.22
Body mass index, kg/m2 No 573 0.28 [−0.32, 0.88] 0.37 487 −0.23 [−1.65, 1.19] 0.75
Waist circumference, cm No 573 0.18 [−1.29, 1.65] 0.81 487 −2.14 [−5.58, 1.31] 0.22
Waist-to-height ratio No 573 0.001 [−0.007, 0.010] 0.75 487 −0.016 [−0.037, 0.004] 0.12
Visceral fat, L Yes 502 0.01 [−0.07, 0.09] 0.83 423 −0.07 [−0.26, 0.13] 0.52
Subcutaneous fat, L Yes 502 0.02 [−0.04, 0.09] 0.44 423 0.09 [−0.06, 0.23] 0.26
HDL cholesterol, mmol/L No 573 −0.02 [−0.07, 0.03] 0.45 487 −0.01 [−0.12, 0.10] 0.84
LDL cholesterol, mmol/L No 573 −0.07 [−0.20, 0.05] 0.26 487 −0.13 [−0.42, 0.16] 0.38
Total cholesterol, mmol/L No 573 −0.12 [−0.26, 0.03] 0.12 487 −0.20 [−0.54, 0.13] 0.24
Total triglycerides, mmol/L Yes 573 −0.04 [−0.11, 0.03] 0.26 487 −0.08 [−0.24, 0.07] 0.31
Vaspin, ng/dL Yes 536 0.08 [−0.06, 0.23] 0.27 454 0.28 [−0.06, 0.62] 0.10
Leptin, ng/dL Yes 561 0.02 [−0.07, 0.12] 0.66 475 −0.05 [−0.28, 0.17] 0.64
Serum glucose, mmol/L No 573 0.46 [0.01, 0.91] 0.05 −1.40 [−2.56, −0.23] 0.02 487 0.82 [0.08, 1.57] 0.03 −4.10 [−7.89, −0.31] 0.03
HbA1c, % No 573 0.004 [−0.077, 0.086] 0.92 487 −0.12 [−0.31, 0.08] 0.23
HOMA-IR Yes 573 0.001 [−0.098, 0.100] 0.98 487 0.02 [−0.21, 0.25] 0.85
Insulin, μIU/mL Yes 313 0.10 [−0.06, 0.27] 0.22 269 −0.03 [−0.29, 0.23] 0.81

Log-scale indicates whether the dependent variable was transformed by natural logarithm before analysis.

*

Multivariate linear regression model adjusted for age and sex; **additional variable if 3,5-T2 concentrations were modeled by means of restricted cubic splines (appears only when the usage of splines represented a gain in model quality assessed by a likelihood ratio test).