Skip to main content
Standards in Genomic Sciences logoLink to Standards in Genomic Sciences
. 2015 Feb 9;10:14. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-10-14

A Genomic Encyclopedia of the Root Nodule Bacteria: assessing genetic diversity through a systematic biogeographic survey

Wayne Reeve 1,, Julie Ardley 1, Rui Tian 1, Leila Eshragi 1,2, Je Won Yoon 1, Pinyaruk Ngamwisetkun 1, Rekha Seshadri 3, Natalia N Ivanova 3, Nikos C Kyrpides 3,4
PMCID: PMC4322651  PMID: 25685260

Abstract

Root nodule bacteria are free-living soil bacteria, belonging to diverse genera within the Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, that have the capacity to form nitrogen-fixing symbioses with legumes. The symbiosis is specific and is governed by signaling molecules produced from both host and bacteria. Sequencing of several model RNB genomes has provided valuable insights into the genetic basis of symbiosis. However, the small number of sequenced RNB genomes available does not currently reflect the phylogenetic diversity of RNB, or the variety of mechanisms that lead to symbiosis in different legume hosts. This prevents a broad understanding of symbiotic interactions and the factors that govern the biogeography of host-microbe symbioses.

Here, we outline a proposal to expand the number of sequenced RNB strains, which aims to capture this phylogenetic and biogeographic diversity. Through the Vavilov centers of diversity (Proposal ID: 231) and GEBA-RNB (Proposal ID: 882) projects we will sequence 107 RNB strains, isolated from diverse legume hosts in various geographic locations around the world. The nominated strains belong to nine of the 16 currently validly described RNB genera. They include 13 type strains, as well as elite inoculant strains of high commercial importance. These projects will strongly support systematic sequence-based studies of RNB and contribute to our understanding of the effects of biogeography on the evolution of different species of RNB, as well as the mechanisms that determine the specificity and effectiveness of nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation by RNB with diverse legume hosts.

Keywords: GEBA-RNB, Root nodule bacteria, Diversity, Symbiosis, Nitrogen fixation

Introduction

The importance of the research

Legumes, with around 20,000 species and over 700 genera, are the third largest flowering plant family and are found on all continents (except Antarctica). They are major components of most of the world’s vegetation types and have important roles in agriculture as both pastures and pulses [1,2]. Most legumes are able to form dinitrogen-fixing symbioses with soil bacteria, collectively known as root nodule bacteria or rhizobia. RNB infection elicits the organogenesis of a unique structure, the nodule, which forms on the root (or less commonly, the stem) of the host plant. The mode of infection and the morphology and structure of the resulting nodule varies within the different legume tribes and has phylogenetic significance [3,4]. Following infection, RNB migrate to the nodule primordium, are endocytosed within the host cell and differentiate into N2-fixing bacteroids.

The availability of utilizable nitrogen is the critical determinant for plant productivity. Legume-RNB symbiotic nitrogen fixation is a vital source of N in both natural and agricultural ecosystems. Based on different estimates, the total annual input of biologically fixed N ranges from 139 to 175 million tons, 35 to 44 million tons of which is attributed to RNB-legume associations growing on arable land, with those in permanent pastures accounting for another 45 million tons of N. N2-fixation by legume pastures and crops provides 65% of the N currently utilized in agricultural production [5,6]. The economic value of legumes on the farm is estimated at $30 billion annually, including $22 billion in the value of legume crops and $8 billion in the value of N2-fixation. Increasing the efficiency of the legume-RNB symbiosis has been projected to have an annual US benefit of $1,067 million, while transferring SNF technology to cereals and totally eliminating chemical N fertilization of the major crops will have an annual US benefit of $4,484 million [7].

Incorporating SNF in agricultural systems also reduces energy consumption, compared with systems that rely on chemical N-input. Every ton of manufactured N-fertilizer requires 873 m3 of natural gas and ultimately releases ~2 tons of CO2 into the air [8]. Furthermore, >50% of US N-fertilizer is imported, which further increases the energy cost of chemical N fertilizer. SNF has the potential to reduce the application of manufactured N-fertilizer by ~160 million tons pa, equating to a reduction of 270 million tons of coal or equivalent fossil fuel consumed in the production process. As well as energy cost savings, this reduces CO2 greenhouse gas emissions. Legume- and forage-based rotations also reduce CO2 emission by maintaining high levels of soil organic matter, thus enhancing both soil fertility and carbon storage in soil [9]. There are additional significant environmental costs to the use of N fertilizer: agriculturally based increases in reactive N are substantial and widespread, and lead to losses of biological diversity, compromised air and water quality, and threats to human health [10]. Microbial nitrification and denitrification of soil N are major contributors to emissions of the potent greenhouse gas and air pollutant, nitrous oxide, from agricultural soils [5]. Emission of N2O is in direct proportion to the amount of fertilizer applied. In addition, fertilizer N not recovered by the crop rapidly enters surface and groundwater pools, leading to drinking water contamination, and eutrophication and hypoxia in aquatic ecosystems [8].

The global increase in population is predicted to double demand for agricultural production by 2050 [11]. To meet this demand without incurring the high and unsustainable costs associated with the increased use of chemical N-fertilizer, the N2-fixing potential of the legume-RNB symbiosis must be maximized. Achieving this target will require a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern specificity and effectiveness of N2-fixation in diverse RNB-legume symbioses.

Genome sequencing of RNB strains has revolutionized our understanding of the bacterial functional genomics that underpin symbiotic interactions and N2-fixation. However, previous RNB sequencing projects have not reflected the phylogenetic and biogeographic diversity of RNB or the variety of mechanisms that lead to symbiosis in different legume hosts. As a result, the insights gained into SNF have been limited to a small group of symbioses and there has not yet been a systematic effort to remedy this narrow focus.

Here, we outline proposals for two sequencing projects to be undertaken at the DoE Joint Genome Institute that aim to expand the number of sequenced RNB strains in order to capture this phylogenetic and biogeographic diversity. Through the Vavilov centers of diversity (Proposal ID: 231) and GEBA-RNB (Proposal ID: 882) projects we will sequence 107 RNB strains isolated from diverse legume hosts in various geographic locations in over 30 countries around the world. The sequenced strains belong to nine of the 16 validly described RNB genera and have been isolated from 69 different legume species, representing 39 taxonomically diverse genera, growing in diverse biomes. These proposals will provide unprecedented perspectives on the evolution, ecology and biogeography of legume-RNB symbioses, as no rhizobial sequencing project so far has attempted to relate extensive genomic characterization of RNB strains to comprehensive metadata and thereby identify correlations between the genomes of rhizobial strains, their symbiotic associations with specific legume hosts, and the environmental parameters of their habitats.

Project design

Selection of target organisms

The proposed RNB genome sequencing projects were designed with two different but complementary objectives in mind. In the “Analysis of the clover, pea/bean and lupin microsymbiont genetic pool by studying isolates from distinct Vavilov centres of diversity” project (Proposal ID: 231), the nominated RNB included clover, pea/Vicia and lupin-nodulating strains, chosen because their hosts are of highly significant commercial importance [12]. The legumes originate from six distinct Vavilov centres of diversity: the Mediterranean basin, high altitude Temperate Europe, North America, South America, highland central Africa and southern Africa [13]. The rhizobial associations in these centers have phenological and geographic specificity for nodulation and nitrogen fixation [14,15]. A detailed analysis of strains representing the six centres of diversity will enable the investigation of the evolution and biodiversity of symbioses from a geographic and phenological viewpoint.

The GEBA-RNB project falls under the umbrella of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea family projects. The original GEBA project [16] sequenced and analysed the genomes of Bacteria and Archaea species selected to maximize phylogenetic coverage. RNB are polyphyletic, belonging to diverse genera of the Alphaproteobacteria- and Betaproteobacteria; currently, 16 genera and over 100 species have been validly described (ICSP Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Rhizobium and Agrobacterium). Existing RNB sequencing programs have tended to focus on particular organisms or on RNB isolated from specific hosts. The GEBA-RNB project was therefore designed as a systematic genome sequencing project to capture RNB phylogenetic and symbiotic diversity. RNB strains were selected on the basis of (i) phylogenetic diversity, (ii) legume host diversity, (iii) economic importance and (iv) biogeographic origin. Strains were also required to have comprehensive metadata records and well characterized phenotypes, in particular relating to symbiotic effectiveness. In addition, the phylogenetic divergence of strains from previously sequenced isolates was taken into account.

The map in Figure 1 shows collection sites of strains selected for sequencing. Table 1 lists the strains nominated for sequencing, their country of origin and original host. Extensive metadata is available for all strains and was used to guide strain selection; proposed strains display a wide range of host specificities (from strictly specific to highly promiscuous) and SNF efficiency. The RNB were collected from sites that spanned a broad range of soils and climates (e.g. neutral, acidic or alkaline soil, tropical, arid or temperate climate). These strains differ in their physiological attributes (ability to recycle hydrogen, rhizobitoxine production, salt and acid tolerance, heavy metal resistance, methylotrophy) and some of them display unusual genetic features (unique genotype based on multilocus sequence typing, nodulation phenotype, atypical organization of symbiosis islands or identical symbiosis islands in different genetic backgrounds).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

This map shows the location of isolation of root nodule bacteria strains requested for sequencing in this proposal. Color codes are as follows: Alphaproteobacteria; Azorhizobium (yellow), Bradyrhizobium (green), Ensifer (red), Mesorhizobium (light blue), Methylobacterium (purple), Microvirga (orange), Rhizobium (blue) and Betaproteobacteria (circles); Burkholderia (yellow), Cupriavidus (blue).

Table 1.

Root nodule bacteria strains used in the Vavilov centers of diversity (Proposal ID: 231) and GEBA-RNB (Proposal ID: 882) genome sequencing projects

Genus Species Strain Country of isolation Original host
Azorhizobium
Azorhizobium doebereinerae
UFLA1-100T
Brazil
Sesbania virgata
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium elkanii
USDA 76T
USA
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium elkanii
USDA 94
USA
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium elkanii
USDA 3259
USA
Phaseolus lunatus
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium elkanii
USDA 3254
USA
Phaseolus acutifolius
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
WSM1741
Australia
Rhynchosia minima
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp
USDA 4
USA
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
*USDA 6T
Japan
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
USDA 38
Japan
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
*USDA 122
USA
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
USDA 123
USA
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
USDA 124
USA
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
USDA 135
USA
Glycine max
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
WSM1743
Australia
Indigofera sp.
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
*WSM2254
Australia
Acacia dealbata
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
WSM2793
South Africa
Rhynchosia totta.
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
Ai1a-2
Costa Rica
Andira inermis
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
ARR65
Australia
Stylosanthes viscosa
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
*CB756
Zimbabwe
Macrotyloma africanum
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
Cp5.3
Panama
Centrosema pubescens
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
EC3.3
Panama
Erythrina costaricensis
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
Th.b2
USA
Amphicarpaea bracteata
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
TV2a.2
Panama
Tachigali versicolor
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
*USDA 3384
Brazil
Crotalaria paulina
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
*WSM471
Australia
Ornithopus pinnatus
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
WSM1253
Greece
Ornithopus compressus
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
WSM1417
Chile
Lupinus sp.
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
WSM2783
South Africa
Leobordea carinata
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
WSM3983
Australia
Kennedia coccinea
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium sp.
WSM4349
USA
Syrmatium glabrum
Burkholderia
Burkholderia dilworthii
WSM3556T
South Africa
Lebeckia ambigua
Burkholderia
Burkholderia mimosarum
STM3621
French Guiana
Mimosa pudica
Burkholderia
Burkholderia mimosarum
LMG 23256T
Taiwan
Mimosa pigra
Burkholderia
Burkholderia sprentiae
WSM5005T
South Africa
Lebeckia ambigua
Burkholderia
Burkholderia symbiotica
JPY347
Brazil
Mimosa cordistipula
Burkholderia
Burkholderia tuberum
WSM4176
South Africa
Lebeckia ambigua
Burkholderia
Burkholderia sp.
JPY251
Brazil
Mimosa velloziana
Burkholderia
Burkholderia sp.
JPY366
Brazil
Mimosa misera
Burkholderia
Burkholderia sp.
UYPR1.413
Uruguay
Parapiptadenia rigida
Burkholderia
Burkholderia sp.
WSM2230
Australia
Kennedia coccinea
Burkholderia
Burkholderia sp..
WSM2232
Australia
Gastrolobium capitatum
Cupriavidus
Cupriavidus taiwanensis
STM6018
French Guiana
Mimosa pudica
Cupriavidus
Cupriavidus taiwanensis
STM6070
New Caledonia
Mimosa pudica
Cupriavidus
Cupriavidus sp.
AMP6
USA
Mimosa asperata
Cupriavidus
Cupriavidus sp.
UYPR2.512
Uruguay
Parapiptadenia rigida
Ensifer
Ensiferar boris
LMG 14919T
Sudan
Prosopis chilensis
Ensifer
Ensifer medicae
Di28
Sardinia
Medicago arabica
Ensifer
Ensifer medicae
WSM244
Iraq
Medicago polymorpha
Ensifer
Ensifer medicae
*WSM1115
Greece
Medicago polymorpha
Ensifer
Ensifer medicae
WSM1369
Sardinia
Medicago sphaerocarpos
Ensifer
Ensifer medicae
WSM4191
Australia
Melilotus siculus
Ensifer
Ensifer meliloti
*4H41
Tunisia
Phaseolus vulgaris
Ensifer
Ensifer meliloti
CIAM1775
Kazakhstan
Medicago lupulina
Ensifer
Ensifer meliloti
GVPV12
Canary Islands (Spain)
Phaseolus vulgaris
Ensifer
Ensifer meliloti
Mlalz-1
Canary Islands (Spain)
Medicago laciniata
Ensifer
Ensifer meliloti
MVII-I
Germany
Medicago sativa
Ensifer
Ensifer meliloti
*RRI128
Australia
Medicago truncatula
Ensifer
Ensifer meliloti
WSM1022
Greece
Medicago orbicularis
Ensifer
Ensifer sp.
BR816
Brazil
Leucaena leucocephala
Ensifer
Ensifer sp.
PC2
India
Prosopis cineraria
Ensifer
Ensifer sp.
TW10
India
Tephrosia wallichii
Ensifer
Ensifer sp.
USDA 6670 (CC 2017)
Australia
Medicago sativa
Ensifer
Ensifer sp.
WSM1721
Australia
Indigofera sp.
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium ciceri
CMG6
Tunisia
Cicer arietinum
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium ciceri
WSM4083
Canary Islands (Spain)
Bituminaria bituminosa
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium loti
CJ3sym
New Zealand
Lotus corniculatus
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium loti
NZP2037
New Zealand
Lotus divaricatus
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium loti
R7A
New Zealand
Lotus corniculatus
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium loti
R88b
New Zealand
Lotus corniculatus
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium loti
USDA 3471T
New Zealand
Lotus corniculatus
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium sp.
WSM1293
Greece
Lotus sp.
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium sp.
WSM2561
South Africa
Lessertia diffusa
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium sp.
WSM3224
South Africa
Otholobium candicans
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium sp.
WSM3626
South Africa
Lessertia diffusa
Methylobacterium
Mesorhizobium sp.
WSM2598
South Africa
Listia bainesii
Microvirga
Microvirga lotononidis
WSM3557T
Zambia
Listia angolensis
Microvirga
Microvirga lupini
Lut6T
USA
Lupinus texensis
Rhizobium
Rhizobium giardinii
H152T
France
Phaseolus vulgaris
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Phaseoli
4292
UK
Phaseolus vulgaris
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarumbv. Phaseoli
FA23
Poland
Phaseolus vulgaris
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
*CB782
Kenya
Trifolium semipilosum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
CC278f
USA
Trifolium nanum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
*CC283b
Russia
Trifolium ambiguum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
SRDI565
Australia
Trifolium subterraneum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
SRDI943
Australia
Trifolium subterraneum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
*TA1
Australia
Trifolium subterraneum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
WSM597
Uruguay
Trifolium pallidum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
WSM1689
Greece
Trifolium uniflorum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
WSM2012
Ethiopia
Trifolium ruepellianum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii
WSM2297
South Africa
Trifolium africanum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
248
UK
Vicia faba
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
128C53
UK
Pisum sativum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
GB30
Poland
Pisum sativum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
Ps8
UK
Pisum sativum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
TOM
Turkey
Pisum sativum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
UPM1131
Italy
Pisum sativum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
UPM1137
Italy
Pisum sativum
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
Vc2
UK
Vicia cracca
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
VF39
Germany
Vicia faba
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
Vh3
UK
Vicia hirsuta
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
WSM1455
Greece
Vicia faba
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae
WSM1481
Greece
Vicia faba
Rhizobium
Rhizobium leucaenae
*USDA 9039T
Brazil
Phaseolus vulgaris
Rhizobium
Rhizobium mesoamericanum
STM6155
New Caledonia
Mimosa pudica
Rhizobium
Rhizobium mongolense
USDA 1844T
China
Medicago ruthenica
Rhizobium
Rhizobium sullae
*WSM1592
Italy
Hedysarum coronarium
Rhizobium Rhizobium tibeticum OR 191 USA Medicago sativa

Ttype strain; *commercial inoculant.

Organism growth and nucleic acid isolation

The international consortium, which consists of more than 34 experts in the field from 15 different countries, together with Culture Collections Centers in Australia and Belgium will be growing the 107 different RNB. Quality Control will be performed for all samples before shipping the DNA to the JGI. All samples from members of the consortium that are based in the US, will be sent to Dr Peter van Berkum in Washington DC, and all other samples will be quality controlled at the Centre for Rhizobium Studies, Murdoch University in Australia before shipping to the JGI. Scientists at the Centre for Rhizobium Studies have extensive experience in producing high quality DNA, a skill acquired as a result of a long collaboration with the JGI as is evidenced by collaborative publication [17-22].

Sequencing approach

Most RNB strains are characterized by multipartite genomes, the size of which varies between 5-10 Mb, with an average G + C%age of 60-65%. We propose drafting of the 107 RNB genomes using Illumina, PacBio or Roche sequencing platforms. All genomes will be completed to at least the stage of high quality draft. As most RNB strains carry their symbiotic genes on plasmids or within mobile islands that can be integrated in different sites on the chromosome, accurate scaffolding information is important for separation of chromosomal and plasmid-borne genes of interest.

Annotation and comparative analysis

The microbial genome annotation pipeline at the JGI has been scaled to handle hundreds of microbial genomes per month [23-25].

Publication of analyzed genomes

As many genomes as possible that are of publication quality will be published in Standards in Genomic Sciences [26,27].

The scientific questions we expect to answer

The genome sequences of RNB generated in this project will be used to identify the core genomes of different RNB species, as well as dispensable parts of species pangenomes and their distribution between strains from different locales and/or plant hosts. Symbiotically relevant sets of genes such as those participating in adhesion, biosynthesis of nodulation factors, SNF, energy metabolism and exopolysaccharide biosynthesis will be characterized in detail. This will include the genes’ evolutionary histories and genome dynamics, such as localization on plasmids or within genomic islands and relation to mobile genetic elements. Statistical analyses will be performed in order to identify genes and gene sets that correlate with host specificity, nodulation and SNF efficiency and with various environmental metadata such as edaphic and climatic constraints. Within RNB strains of the same species, but from different environmental sites and/or legume hosts, genes that are under selective pressure will be identified and characterized by analysis of synonymous and non-synonymous substitution rates.

These analyses will be informed by the comprehensive metadata that are available for each strain, including data on the strains’ collection site, host specificity, nodulation and SNF efficiency. Considerable efforts have been devoted to sourcing strains from different geographical locations in order to improve legume productivity across a range of environments, and the project takes advantage of the particularly well characterized RNB that have been sourced from several culture collections around the globe. Biogeographic considerations are particularly relevant to the RNB as their survival and persistence as soil saprophytes is dictated by environmental and edaphic constraints such as temperature, salinity, pH, and soil moisture and clay content [28].

This project will support systematic sequence-based studies of the RNB and contribute to our understanding of the biogeographic effects on the evolution of different rhizobial species, as well as the mechanisms determining the specificity and efficiency of nodulation and N2-fixation by RNB.

The relevance of the project to problems of societal importance

The symbiotic nitrogen fixation by RNB is a significant asset for world agricultural productivity, farming economy and environmental sustainability. Large-scale agricultural use of highly effective N2-fixing legumes will be critical for sustainable food production for livestock and humans. Increased incorporation of SNF into agricultural systems reduces the requirement for inputs of economically and environmentally costly nitrogenous fertilizer. Currently, ~1–2% of the world's annual energy supply is used in the Haber-Bosch process to manufacture chemical N, at a cost of $US 6.8 billion pa. In addition, SNF significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions compared to intensive agriculture practice, which requires large inputs of chemical N. SNF also benefits the environment by helping to reduce dry-land salinity, increase soil fertility, promote carbon sequestration and prevent eutrophication of waterways. Recent publications have also emphasized the importance of providing renewable sources of biofuels [29,30], and a detailed understanding of endosymbionts and SNF will aid this quest. Pongamia pinnata, for example, is a leguminous tree that is important for the biofuel industry and is nodulated by a Bradyrhizobium strain [31] that has been included for sequencing in this proposal.

Apart from their economic importance, RNB also represent a uniquely tractable biological system that can offer insights into the shared genetic mechanisms between fungal and bacterial root endosymbioses [32] and between intracellular pathogens and endocytosed RNB microsymbionts. The latter have been shown to share similar host-adapted strategies in their infection processes and adaptation to growth within the cytoplasm of a eukaryotic host [33,34]. An understanding of these mechanisms will facilitate the quest to extend N2-fixation to cereals, a goal which is being vigorously pursued and which has been described as essential for future sustainable food production [35].

Conclusion

The legume-RNB symbiosis is one of the best-studied associations between microbes and eukaryotes, due to the economic and ecological importance of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Targeting RNB for sequencing on the basis of firstly, phylogenetic diversity and secondly, isolation from taxonomically distinct host legumes growing in diverse biomes offers significant benefits. Previous RNB sequencing projects have tended to focus on a narrow range of model organisms. By setting a goal of maximizing the phylogenetic diversity of sequenced RNB strains, these projects, in keeping with the other members of the GEBA family of projects, aid the development of a phylogenetically balanced genomic representation of the microbial tree of life and allow for the large-scale discovery of novel rhizobial genes and functions. The chosen RNB strains are available to the global research community and are stored in culture collections that are dedicated to long-term storage and distribution. A wealth of experimental data and metadata is available for each strain, which will inform analyses to identify genes and gene sets that correlate with rhizobial adaptation to diverse biomes, to the nodule environments found in taxonomically distinct legume hosts and to the effectiveness of nitrogen fixation within these nodules. Moreover, the legume-RNB symbiosis is an excellent model system to study plant-bacterial associations, including symbiotic signaling, cell differentiation and the mechanisms of endocytosis. The sequenced RNB genomes will not only provide a greater understanding of legume-RNB associations, but can be used to gain insights into the evolution of N2-fixing symbioses and microbe-eukaryote interactions.

Abbreviations

RNB: Root nodule bacteria; N2: Dinitrogen; N: nitrogen; SNF: Symbiotic nitrogen fixation; N2O: Nitrous oxide; GEBA: Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

WR and JA supplied background information for this project, TR supplied DNA to the JGI, WR and JA drafted the paper, JWY and PN supplied figures and all other authors were involved in sequencing the genomes and/or editing the final paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Wayne Reeve, Email: W.Reeve@murdoch.edu.au.

Julie Ardley, Email: J.Ardley@murdoch.edu.au.

Rui Tian, Email: protein17@yahoo.com.sg.

Leila Eshragi, Email: l.eshragi@murdoch.edu.au.

Je Won Yoon, Email: yoon_0411@hotmail.com.

Pinyaruk Ngamwisetkun, Email: sun.ngamwise@live.com.

Rekha Seshadri, Email: rseshadri@lbl.gov.

Natalia N Ivanova, Email: nnivanova@lbl.gov.

Nikos C Kyrpides, Email: nckyrpides@lbl.gov.

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

References

  1. Lewis G, Schrire B, Mackinder B, Lock M. Legumes of the World. Richmond, Surrey: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Graham PH, Vance CP. Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:872–7. doi: 10.1104/pp.017004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sprent JI, James EK. Legume evolution: where do nodules and mycorrhizas fit in? Plant Physiol. 2007;144:575–81. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.096156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sprent JI, Ardley JK, James EK. From North to South: a latitudinal look at legume nodulation processes. S Afr J Bot. 2013;89:31–41. [Google Scholar]
  5. Socolow RH. Nitrogen management and the future of food: Lessons from the management of energy and carbon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:6001–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Galloway JN, Schlesinger WH, Levy H, Michaels A, Schnoor JL. Nitrogen fixation: anthropogenic enhancement-environmental response. Global Biogeochem Cy. 1995;9:235–52. doi: 10.1029/95GB00158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tauer L. Economic impact of future biological nitrogen fixation technologies on United States agriculture. Plant Soil. 1989;119:261–70. doi: 10.1007/BF02370418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vance CP. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition: plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:390–7. doi: 10.1104/pp.010331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gregorich EG, Rochette P, VandenBygaart AJ, Angers DA. Greenhouse gas contributions of agricultural soils and potential mitigation practices in Eastern Canada. Soil Till Res. 2005;83:53–72. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robertson GP, Vitousek PM. Nitrogen in agriculture: balancing the cost of an essential resource. Annu Rev Env Resour. 2009;34:97–125. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. Plos One. 2013;8:e66428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Howieson JG, O’Hara GW, Carr SJ. Changing roles for legumes in Mediterranean agriculture: developments from an Australian perspective. Field Crop Res. 2000;65:107–22. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00081-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zohary M, Heller D. The Genus Trifolium. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities Ahva Printing Press; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gladstones JS, Atkins CA, Hamblin J. Lupins as Crop Plants: Biology, Production, and Utilization. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: New York, NY, USA: CAB International; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  15. Howieson J, Yates R, O'Hara G, Ryder M, Real D. The interactions of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii in nodulation of annual and perennial Trifolium spp from diverse centres of origin. Aust J Exp Agric. 2005;45:199–207. doi: 10.1071/EA03167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, Hooper SD, Pati A, Lykidis A, Spring S, Anderson IJ, D'haeseleer P, Zemla A, Singer M, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Copeland A, Han C, Chen F, Cheng J-F, Lucas S, Kerfeld C, Lang E, Gronow S, Chain P, Bruce D. et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009;462:1056–60. doi: 10.1038/nature08656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reeve W, Chain P, O'Hara G, Ardley J, Nandesena K, Brau L, Tiwari R, Malfatti S, Kiss H, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Nolan M, Land M, Hauser L, Chang YJ, Ivanova N, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Kyrpides N, Gollagher M, Yates R, Dilworth M, Howieson J. Complete genome sequence of the Medicago microsymbiont Ensifer (Sinorhizobium) medicae strain WSM419. Stand Genom Sci. 2010;2:77–86. doi: 10.4056/sigs.43526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reeve W, O'Hara G, Chain P, Ardley J, Brau L, Nandesena K, Tiwari R, Copeland A, Nolan M, Han C, Brettin T, Land M, Ovchinikova G, Ivanova N, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Kyrpides N, Melino V, Denton M, Yates R, Howieson J. Complete genome sequence of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii strain WSM1325, an effective microsymbiont of annual Mediterranean clovers. Stand Genom Sci. 2010;2:347–56. doi: 10.4056/sigs.852027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reeve W, O'Hara G, Chain P, Ardley J, Brau L, Nandesena K, Tiwari R, Malfatti S, Kiss H, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Nolan M, Land M, Ivanova N, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Kyrpides N, Melino V, Denton M, Yates R, Howieson J. Complete genome sequence of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv trifolii strain WSM2304, an effective microsymbiont of the South American clover Trifolium polymorphum. Stand Genom Sci. 2010;2:66–76. doi: 10.4056/sigs.44642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Reeve WG, Nandasena K, Yates R, Tiwari R, O'Hara G, Ninawi M, Chertkov O, Goodwin L, Bruce D, Detter C, Tapia R, Han S, Woyke T, Pitluck S, Nolan M, Land M, Copeland A, Liolios K, Pati A, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Kyrpides N, Ivanova N, Meenakshi U, Howieson J. Complete genome sequence of Mesorhizobium opportunistum type strain WSM2075T. Stand Genom Sci. 2013;9:294–303. doi: 10.4056/sigs.4538264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reeve W, Nandasena K, Yates R, Tiwari R, O'Hara G, Ninawi M, Gu W, Goodwin L, Detter C, Tapia R, Han C, Copeland A, Liolios K, Chen A, Markowitz V, Pati A, Mavromatis K, Woyke T, Kyrpides N, Ivanova N, Howieson J. Complete genome sequence of Mesorhizobium australicum type strain (WSM2073T) Stand Genom Sci. 2013;9:410–19. doi: 10.4056/sigs.4568282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nanadasena K, Yates R, Tiwari R, O'Hara G, Howieson J, Ninawi M, Chertkov O, Detter C, Tapia R, Han S, Woyke T, Pitluck S, Nolan M, Land M, Liolios K, Pati A, Copeland A, Kyrpides NC, Ivanova N, Goodwin L, Meenakshi U, Reeve W. Complete genome sequence of Mesorhizobium ciceri bv. biserrulae type strain (WSM1271T) Stand Genom Sci. 2013;9:462–72. doi: 10.4056/sigs.4458283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Szeto E, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The DOE-JGI standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand Genom Sci. 2009;1:63–67. doi: 10.4056/sigs.632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods. 2010;7:455–7. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2271–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Garrity GM, Field D, Kyrpides N, Hirschman L, Sansone S-A, Angiuoli S, Cole JR, Glöckner FO, Kolker E, Kowalchuk G, Moran MA, Ussery D, White O. Toward a standards-compliant genomic and metagenomic publication record. Omics. 2008;12:157–60. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.A2B2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Garrity GM. The state of standards in genomic sciences. Stand Genom Sci. 2011;5:262–8. doi: 10.4056/sigs.2515706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Poole PS, Hynes MF, Johnston AWB, Tiwari RP, Reeve WG, Downie JA. In: Nitrogen-Fixing Legume Symbioses. Dilworth MJ, James EK, Sprent JI, Newton WE, editor. Vol. 7. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2008. Physiology of root nodule bacteria; pp. 241–92. [Google Scholar]
  29. Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O'Hare M, Kammen DM. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science. 2006;311:506–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1121416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11206–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604600103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Samuel S, Scott PT, Gresshoff PM. Nodulation in the legume biofuel feedstock tree Pongamia pinnata. Agric Res. 2013;2:207–14. doi: 10.1007/s40003-013-0074-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Parniske M. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat Rev Micro. 2008;6:763–75. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Deakin WJ, Broughton WJ. Symbiotic use of pathogenic strategies: rhizobial protein secretion systems. Nat Rev Micro. 2009;7:312–20. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Toft C, Andersson SGE. Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:465–75. doi: 10.1038/nrg2798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Charpentier M, Oldroyd G. How close are we to nitrogen-fixing cereals? Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13:556–64. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Standards in Genomic Sciences are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES