Abstract
We are proposing a "Preselection Hypothesis" to account for the regulation of crossing-over in eukaryotic organisms. The hypothesis characterized meiosis in terms of three major physiological stages: (1) a presynaptic stage when pairs of homologous DNA stretches are selected so as to become trapped within the synaptinemal complex during synapsis, (2) an alignment of homologous chromosomes and stabilization of paired bivalents via the synaptinemal complex, and (3) a scission and rejoining of DNA stretches leading to the formation of chiasmata and crossovers. The hypothesis centers on the first stage and is based on evidence for the occurrence of significant cytological and biochemical changes prior to synapsis. The major feature of the hypothesis is that crossing-over occurs only in trapped DNA stretches. Thus, potential crossing-over sites, though not crossing-over itself, are determined well before chromosomes pair. Since, to a large degree, crossovers are distributed randomly along the length of each chromosome, the preselection process must result in a random assortment of trapped DNA stretches, the assortment differing from one meiocyte to another.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bennett M. D., Stern H., Woodward M. Chromatin attachment to nuclear membrane of wheat pollen mother cells. Nature. 1974 Nov 29;252(5482):395–396. doi: 10.1038/252395a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Callan H. G. DNA replication in the chromosomes of eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:195–203. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chiu S. M., Hastings P. J. Pre-Meiotic DNA Synthesis and Recombination in CHLAMYDOMONAS REINHARDI. Genetics. 1973 Jan;73(1):29–43. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillies C. B. Reconstruction of the Neurospora crassa pachytene karyotype from serial sections of synaptonemal complexes. Chromosoma. 1972;36(2):119–130. doi: 10.1007/BF00285207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grell R. F., Bank H., Gassner G. Meiotic exchange without the synaptinemal complex. Nat New Biol. 1972 Nov 29;240(100):155–157. doi: 10.1038/newbio240155a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henderson S. A. The time and place of meiotic crossing-over. Annu Rev Genet. 1970;4:295–324. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.04.120170.001455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King R. C. The meiotic behavior of the Drosophila oocyte. Int Rev Cytol. 1970;28:125–168. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62542-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- La Cour L. F., Wells B. The nuclear pores of early meiotic prophase nuclei of plants. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1972;123(2):178–194. doi: 10.1007/BF02583472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maguire M. P. Evidence on the stage of heat induced crossover effect in maize. Genetics. 1968 Oct;60(2):353–362. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ninnemann H., Epel B. Inhibition of cell division by blue light. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Jun;79(2):318–326. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90450-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westergaard M., von Wettstein D. The synaptinemal complex. Annu Rev Genet. 1972;6:71–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.06.120172.000443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]