Abstract
The POM-1 metallo-β-lactamase is a subclass B3 resident enzyme produced by Pseudomonas otitidis, a pathogen causing otic infections. The enzyme was overproduced in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3), purified by chromatography, and subjected to structural and functional analysis. The purified POM-1 is a tetrameric enzyme of broad substrate specificity with higher catalytic activities with penicillins and carbapenems than with cephalosporins.
TEXT
Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) are resistance determinants of clinical importance due to their constant and potent carbapenemase activity, which is usually associated with broad substrate specificity covering most β-lactam families. MBLs may be found either as acquired enzymes encoded by mobile genetic elements or as resident enzymes in some bacterial species. The latter have been detected in some environmental species, of which only some are of clinical significance (1).
POM-1 is a subclass B3 MBL recently identified in Pseudomonas otitidis (2), a Pseudomonas species that is found associated with otic infections in humans and can also be found as a free-living aquatic Pseudomonas species in some environments (3–5). As such, POM-1 represents the first example of a resident MBL found in a pathogenic Pseudomonas species (2).
Preliminary functional characterization of POM-1, carried out by expression of the cloned gene in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, revealed an overall broad substrate specificity, with an apparent preference for penicillins and carbapenems (2). However, the biochemical properties of this enzyme, which exhibits the closest similarity (60% of amino acid identity) with the resident L1 MBL from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia while being quite divergent from the other subclass B3 enzymes (identity range, 23 to 37% with GOB-1 and BJP-1, respectively), have not been investigated. The aim of this work was to purify and determine the kinetic and other biochemical properties of the POM-1 MBL.
The open reading frame encoding POM-1 was amplified by PCR using the primers POM-1_EXP/f (5′-TTCATATGCGTACCCTGACCCCCC) and POM-1_EXP/r (5′-CGGGATCCTGCGTCATCAGAGACCTC) containing an NdeI and a BamHI restriction site, respectively (underlined). The source of the blaPOM-1 gene was P. otitidis strain MC10330 (2). The NdeI-BamHI fragment was cloned into the pLBII vector (6) and the pET-9a expression vector (Novagen, Inc., Madison, WI) to obtain the recombinant plasmids pLBII-POM-1 and pET-POM-1, respectively. The cloned blaPOM-1 gene was sequenced to exclude the presence of any PCR-generated mutations.
Escherichia coli XL1-Blue was transformed with the plasmid pLBII-POM-1, and the MIC values of various β-lactam antibiotics were determined using the broth microdilution method as recommended by the CLSI (7) (Table 1). Production of the MBL conferred resistance to ampicillin, cephalothin, and cefoxitin and decreased susceptibility to most other cephalosporins and all tested carbapenems. Piperacillin, ceftazidime, and cefepime MICs were increased by only a single log2 dilution with the POM-1-producing E. coli laboratory strain, suggesting that some of these compounds might behave as poor substrates of the enzyme. The aztreonam MIC value was not affected, as monobactams are not substrates of MBLs.
TABLE 1.
β-Lactam | MIC (μg/ml) for: |
|
---|---|---|
E. coli XL1-Blue (pLBII-POM-1) | E. coli XL1-Blue (pBC-SK) | |
Ampicillin | 64 | 2 |
Piperacillin | 2 | 1 |
Ticarcillin | 32 | 8 |
Cephalothin | 64 | 16 |
Cefoxitin | 64 | 16 |
Cefotaxime | 0.5 | 0.12 |
Ceftazidime | 0.5 | 0.25 |
Ceftriaxone | 0.5 | 0.06 |
Cefepime | 0.25 | 0.125 |
Cefotetan | 4 | 0.5 |
Imipenem | 1 | 0.125 |
Panipenem | 1 | 0.25 |
Meropenem | 1 | 0.06 |
Ertapenem | 1 | ≤0.015 |
Doripenem | 0.125 | ≤0.015 |
Aztreonam | 0.25 | 0.25 |
POM-1 was produced using a T7 promoter-based E. coli BL21(DE3), in which the pET-POM-1 plasmid was introduced by electroporation, after growth at 37°C in ZYP-5052 medium (8) supplemented with 50 μg/ml kanamycin for 48 h. The production of β-lactamase activity was monitored by following the hydrolysis of 150 μM imipenem in 50 mM HEPES buffer supplemented with 50 μM ZnSO4 (pH 7.5) (buffer H). POM-1 was purified from the culture supernatant by chromatography. Briefly, the sample was concentrated by ultrafiltration, using a 10,000-nominal-molecular-weight-limit (NMWL) cellulose membrane (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), desalted in a HiPrep desalting column (GE Healthcare) against 10 mM triethanolamine buffer (pH 7.5), and loaded onto a HiTrap Q Sepharose Fast Flow (GE Healthcare) column, previously equilibrated with the same buffer. Proteins were eluted using a solution of 0.08 M NaCl, and fractions containing β-lactamase activity were pooled, concentrated, and stored at −20°C. This protocol yielded approximately 8 mg/liter POM-1, showing a purity of ≥95% (specific activity, 528 ± 55 μmol of imipenem/min · mg of protein). The authenticity of the enzyme preparation was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (calibrated using Protein Standard I [Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany] supplemented with 0.3 mg/ml hen lysozyme [Sigma-Aldrich] and 0.4 mg/ml purified VIM-2 MBL [9]), which yielded a molecular mass of 28,636.2 Da, in agreement with the expected theoretical value (28,639.5 Da), calculated for the mature protein (signal peptide, residues 1 to 19).
Gel filtration chromatography (9) was used to compute an apparent molecular mass of the enzyme in solution of 115,000 ± 4,000 Da, consistent with a tetrameric quaternary structure, as already described for the S. maltophilia L1 MBL (10). Interestingly, the oligomerization of POM-1 was observed despite the presence of a polar Gln residue at position 175, where a Met is found in L1, which was found to interact with a small hydrophobic cavity formed by residues Leu154 (Ile in POM-1), Pro198, and Tyr254 (Phe in POM-1) of the facing subunit. With a spectrophotometric assay with 4-(2-pyridylazo)resorcinol (PAR) as previously described (11), 2.06 ± 0.14 equivalents of zinc were released upon enzyme denaturation, indicating that purified POM-1 is a dizinc enzyme.
The steady-state kinetic parameters of the POM-1 enzyme were determined spectrophotometrically for several substrates at 30°C using buffer H as previously reported (9). The kinetic parameters for a representative group of β-lactam antibiotics are presented in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Substrate |
kcat (mean ± SE) (s−1) |
Km (mean ± SE) (μM) |
kcat/Km (M−1 s−1) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POM-1 | L1 | AIM-1 | POM-1 | L1 | AIM-1 | POM-1 | L1 | AIM-1 | SMB-1 | CAR-1 | THIN-B | CAU-1 | BJP-1 | FEZ-1 | GOB-1 | |
Ampicillin | 190 ± 6 | 175 | 594 | 23 ± 3 | 40 | 41 | 8.1 × 106 | 4.4 × 106 | 1.4 × 106 | 2.4 × 106 | 3.2 × 103 | 3.7 × 105 | 5.0 × 105 | 1.9 × 104 | 1.1 × 104 | —b |
Ticarcillin | 190 ± 6 | 375 | — | 500 ± 46 | 140 | — | 3.9 × 105 | 2.7 × 106 | — | — | 1.3 × 104 | — | — | — | 1.3 × 104 | 5.2 × 105 |
Piperacillin | 9 ± 0.3 | 140 | 337 | 53 ± 8 | 20 | 17 | 1.7 × 105 | 7.0 × 106 | 2 × 107 | 1.8 × 105 | 2.6 × 104 | 2.0 × 105 | 5.7 × 105 | 6.7 × 104 | 1.2 × 104 | 1.7 × 106 |
Cephalothin | 60 ± 0.5 | — | 529 | 7 ± 0.3 | — | 38 | 8.9 × 106 | — | 1.4 × 107 | 1.9 ×106 | 1.2 × 106 | — | 4.3 × 105 | 5.8 × 105 | 2.5 × 106 | 6.7 × 105 |
Cefotaxime | 56 ± 2 | 66 | 609 | 63 ± 6 | 26 | 49 | 9.0 × 105 | 2.6 × 106 | 1.2 × 107 | 8.9 × 105 | 1.5 × 106 | 2.0 × 106 | — | 1.4 × 105 | 2.4 × 106 | 8.5 × 105 |
Ceftazidime | >4 | — | 7 | >800 | — | 148 | 5.3 × 103 | 1.8 × 105 | 4.9 × 104 | 7.7 × 104 | 2.9 × 105 | 1.4 × 105 | 2.0 × 103 | 4.3 × 103 | 4.0 × 103 | 7.6 × 105 |
Cefepime | >1.7 | >15 | 93 | >140 | >1,000 | 594 | 1.2 × 104 | 1.9 × 104 | 1.6 × 105 | 3.6 × 103 | — | 7.9 × 103 | — | 2.0 × 102 | 6.0 × 103 | 2.0 × 105 |
Imipenem | 312 ± 7 | 75 | 1,700 | 52 ± 3 | 100 | 97 | 6.0 × 106 | 7.5 × 105 | 1.7 × 107 | 3.9 × 106 | — | 1.5 × 106 | 2.0 × 105 | 6.0 × 104 | 2.0 × 105 | 6.6 × 105 |
Panipenem | 500 ± 26 | — | — | 102 ± 4 | — | — | 4.9 × 106 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Meropenem | 220 ± 3 | 45 | 1,000 | 16 ± 1 | 10 | 163 | 1.4 × 107 | 4.5 × 106 | 6.8 × 106 | 4.2 × 106 | 9.6 × 102 | 5.0 × 106 | 2.6 × 105 | 8.3 × 105 | 5.0 × 105 | 5.3 × 106 |
Ertapenem | 69 ± 6 | — | — | 4 ± 0.5 | — | — | 1.5 × 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Doripenem | 51 ± 4 | — | — | 7 ± 0.7 | — | — | 6.8 × 106 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Purified POM-1 showed the highest catalytic efficiencies with ampicillin, cephalothin, and all tested carbapenems (kcat/Km of >106 M−1 s−1), being better substrates than ticarcillin, piperacillin, or oxyiminocephalosporins. Most other β-lactam compounds behaved as good substrates, with kcat/Km values of >105 M−1 s−1, the exceptions being ceftazidime and cefepime, which were hydrolyzed 1,680- and 740-fold less efficiently than cephalothin, respectively. The hydrolytic efficiencies of POM-1 with cephalosporins were highly variable, showing values of kcat/Km ranging from 5.3 × 103 to 8.9 × 106 M−1 s−1. Cephalothin was the best substrate among the tested cephalosporins, due to both a high turnover rate (the highest measured for the tested cephalosporins) and a low Km value (among the lowest measured for the tested β-lactams). POM-1 shows pseudo-first-order kinetics with ceftazidime and cefepime at concentrations up to 140 and 800 μM, respectively, indicating that these substrates were poorly recognized by the enzyme, as a potential consequence of the presence of a positively charged R2 substituent that might negatively impact binding of the substrate in the enzyme active site.
POM-1 shows notably high catalytic efficiencies with carbapenems. Imipenem and meropenem were hydrolyzed more efficiently by POM-1 than by other subclass B3 enzymes (with the exception of AIM-1 for imipenem), with 2- to 14,000-fold higher kcat/Km values, mostly due to rather high turnover rates (some of which are noticeably higher than those observed with the globally spread acquired MBL VIM-2 [9]) and small Km values, which also indicated that carbapenems are the preferred substrates of this enzyme.
These kinetic data are overall in agreement with the in vitro susceptibility data obtained with the POM-1-producing E. coli strain. For instance, the high turnover rates observed for the hydrolysis of ampicillin and ticarcillin translated into more noticeable variations of ampicillin and ticarcillin MIC values between the β-lactamase-producing strains and the parental strain (Table 1). Accordingly, the low kcat value for piperacillin (9 s−1), despite a 10-fold lower Km value than that of ticarcillin, determines only a modest increase in the MIC values between the two strains (Table 1). As already observed with E. coli laboratory strains carrying cloned MBL genes (6), the production of POM-1 resulted in decreased susceptibility, rather than resistance, to carbapenems. This is likely due to the fast permeation of these antibiotics in this organism (22).
In order to better understand the contribution of POM-1 production in relation to the Pseudomonas otitidis resistance profile, several attempts to obtain a blaPOM-1 knockout mutant were carried out but proved unsuccessful. However, enzyme assays did show that >96% of the β-lactamase activity produced by P. otitidis strain MC10330, as measured with the chromogenic substrate nitrocefin, which is readily hydrolyzed by most, if not all, β-lactamases, was actually inhibited in the presence of EDTA. In addition, an isoelectric focusing analysis of a crude extract from the same strain did reveal a single nitrocefin-hydrolyzing band at pH 6.0, in agreement with the predicted isoelectric point (pI of 5.98). Overall, these data suggest that POM-1 might represent the major β-lactamase produced by this organism.
In conclusion, POM-1 is a novel broad-spectrum subclass B3 MBL, which exhibits high catalytic activity on carbapenems, including the most recent compounds such as ertapenem and doripenem. It might be regarded as the first member of a group of chromosomal B3 MBLs possibly present within some Pseudomonas species, given that a similar enzyme (PAM-1, 72% similar at the sequence level) has been recently reported in Pseudomonas alcaligenes (23).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded in part by grants from the European Union (contract FP7-HEALTH-223031; project acronym, TROCAR) and by the Italian Ministero dell'Istruzione, Università e Ricerca (MIUR) (contract 200929YFMK_004).
REFERENCES
- 1.Cornaglia G, Giamarellou H, Rossolini GM. 2011. Metallo-β-lactamases: a last frontier for β-lactams? Lancet Infect Dis 11:381–393. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70056-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thaller MC, Borgianni L, Di LG, Chong Y, Lee K, Dajcs J, Stroman D, Rossolini GM. 2011. Metallo-β-lactamase production by Pseudomonas otitidis: a species-related trait. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:118–123. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01062-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clark LL, Dajcs JJ, McLean CH, Bartell JG, Stroman DW. 2006. Pseudomonas otitidis sp. nov., isolated from patients with otic infections. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:709–714. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63753-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee K, Kim CK, Yong D, Yum JH, Chung MH, Chong Y, Thaller MC, Rossolini GM. 2012. POM-1 metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas otitidis isolate from a patient with chronic otitis media. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 72:295–296. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rodríguez-Verdugo A, Souza V, Eguiarte LE, Escalante AE. 2012. Diversity across seasons of culturable Pseudomonas from a desiccation lagoon in Cuatro Cienegas, Mexico. Int J Microbiol 2012:201389. doi: 10.1155/2012/201389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Borgianni L, Vandenameele J, Matagne A, Bini L, Bonomo RA, Frère JM, Rossolini GM, Docquier JD. 2010. Mutational analysis of VIM-2 reveals an essential determinant for metallo-β-lactamase stability and folding. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3197–3204. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01336-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 9th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Studier FW. 2005. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif 41:207–234. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Docquier JD, Lamotte-Brasseur J, Galleni M, Amicosante G, Frère JM, Rossolini GM. 2003. On functional and structural heterogeneity of VIM-type metallo-β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:257–266. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ullah JH, Walsh TR, Taylor IA, Emery DC, Verma CS, Gamblin SJ, Spencer J. 1998. The crystal structure of the L1 metallo-β-lactamase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at 1.7 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 284:125–136. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pegg KM, Liu EM, George AC, LaCuran AE, Bethel CR, Bonomo RA, Oelschlaeger P. 2014. Understanding the determinants of substrate specificity in IMP family metallo-β-lactamases: the importance of residue 262. Protein Sci 23:1451–1460. doi: 10.1002/pro.2530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Felici A, Amicosante G. 1995. Kinetic analysis of extension of substrate specificity with Xanthomonas maltophilia, Aeromonas hydrophila, and Bacillus cereus metallo-beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:192–199. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.1.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Felici A, Amicosante G, Oratore A, Strom R, Ledent P, Joris B, Fanuel L, Frère JM. 1993. An overview of the kinetic parameters of class B β-lactamases. Biochem J 291(Part 1):151–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Docquier JD, Lopizzo T, Liberatori S, Prenna M, Thaller MC, Frère JM, Rossolini GM. 2004. Biochemical characterization of the THIN-B metallo-β-lactamase of Janthinobacterium lividum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4778–4783. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4778-4783.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yong D, Toleman TA, Bell J, Ritchie B, Pratt R, Ryley H, Walsh TR. 2012. Genetic and biochemical characterization of an acquired subgroup B3 metallo-β-lactamase gene, blaAIM-1, and its unique genetic context in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:6154–6159. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05654-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wachino J, Yoshida H, Yamane K, Suzuki S, Matsui M, Yamagishi T, Tsutsui A, Konda T, Shibayama T, Arakawa Y. 2011. SMB-1, a novel subclass B3 metallo-β-lactamase, associated with ISCR1 and a class 1 integron, from a carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5143–5149. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05045-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bellais S, Aubert D, Naas T, Nordmann P. 2000. Molecular and biochemical heterogeneity of class B carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamase from Chryseobacterium meningosepticum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1878–1886. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1878-1886.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mercuri PS, Bouillenne F, Boschi L, Lamotte-Brasseur J, Amicosante G, Devreese B, van Beeumen JJ, Frère JM, Rossolini GM, Galleni M. 2001. Biochemical characterization of the FEZ-1 metallo-β-lactamase of Legionella gormanii ATCC 33297T produced in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:1254–1262. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1254-1262.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stoczko M, Frère JM, Rossolini GM, Docquier JD. 2006. Postgenomic scan of metallo-β-lactamase homologues in rhizobacteria: identification and characterization of BJP-1, a subclass B3 ortholog from Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1973–1981. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01551-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Docquier JD, Pantanella F, Giuliani F, Thaller MC, Amicosante G, Galleni M, Frère JM, Bush K, Rossolini GM. 2002. CAU-1, a subclass B3 metallo-β-lactamase of low substrate affinity encoded by an ortholog present in the Caulobacter crescentus chromosome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:1823–1830. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1823-1830.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stoczko M, Frère JM, Rossolini GM, Docquier JD. 2008. Functional diversity among metallo-β-lactamases: characterization of the CAR-1 enzyme of Erwinia carotovora. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2473–2479. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Matsumura N, Minami S, Watanabe Y, Iyobe S, Mitsuhashi S. 1999. Role of permeability in the activities of β-lactams against gram-negative bacteria which produce a group 3 β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2084–2086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Suzuki M, Suzuki S, Matsui M, Hiraki Y, Kawano F, Shibayama K. 2014. A subclass B3 metallo-β-lactamase found in Pseudomonas alcaligenes. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:1430–1432. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]