Constipation is a common complaint and challenge for older adults. The prevalence of constipation increases with age and differs among settings. In individuals 65 years of age or older in the community, the prevalence is 26% for women and 16% for men.1 This rate increases to 34% for women and 26% for men in those 84 years of age and older.1 For long-term care residents, the prevalence is as high as 80%.1,2
The objective of this article is to discuss a stepwise approach for the management of constipation in older adults. Clinical pearls for successful nonpharmacologic or lifestyle measures and pharmacotherapeutic tips are provided.
Case
Mrs N.M. is an 88-year-old woman who is new to your practice and is brought in today by her daughter. She would like help regarding constipation, which is not new for her. She states that a few months ago she had gone to the local emergency department with abdominal cramping and bloating. After a thorough assessment and abdominal x-ray scan she was diagnosed with fecal impaction secondary to psyllium fibre supplement use with low fluid intake. She was treated with an enema, instructed to take 17 g of polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG 3350) daily, and educated on lifestyle changes to reduce constipation. (In this article, PEG 3350 is without electrolytes, unless otherwise stated.)
Three months ago she fell in her bungalow and fractured a rib. She is now living in a seniors’ apartment building and gets help from her daughter who lives nearby. Today, upon questioning, Mrs N.M. describes her bowel movements as infrequent (2 to 3 times per week), with hard lumpy stools and some straining. She denies having any nausea, vomiting, blood in the stool, rectal bleeding, fever, weight loss, or appetite change. Her past medical history includes osteoarthritis of her shoulders, knees, and hips. She also has hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, and depression. Her past surgical history includes cholecystectomy and appendectomy. She is a social drinker and denies any history of smoking. There are no concerns regarding her cognition. There is no personal or family history of colon cancer.
She occasionally tries to walk for exercise but is unable to do so on a daily basis owing to her arthritis. When asked about her dietary and fluid intake, she states that she likes freshly baked bread, pasta, cheese, and yogurt. She eats 2 servings each of fruit and vegetables daily. She drinks 2 cups of coffee each day but is afraid to drink too much water as she would like to avoid urinating often.
On physical examination she is found to be overweight, with a body mass index of 28 kg/m2, and she is in no obvious distress. Her blood pressure is 140/90 mm Hg with no postural change; her heart rate is 85 beats/min and is irregularly irregular. Her abdomen is soft and nondistended, with no palpable tenderness. There is no organomegaly and bowel sounds are present in all 4 quadrants. On rectal examination some stool is felt, with no palpable mass or blood seen on the glove. There are no anal fissures, rectoceles, or hemorrhoids.
Her current list of medications includes 10 mg of citalopram daily, 5 mg of warfarin daily, 0.125 mg of digoxin daily, 25 mg of metoprolol twice a day, 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide daily, 500 mg of metformin twice a day, 70 mg of alendronate once a week, 500 mg of calcium twice a day, 1000 IU of vitamin D daily, 17 g of PEG 3350 daily, 1 to 2, 325-mg acetaminophen tablets as needed, 25 mg of amitriptyline at bedtime, and 25 mg of dimenhydrinate as needed to help with sleep.
Her recent bloodwork shows normal complete blood count, thyroid and renal function, and liver enzyme levels. Her hemoglobin A1c level is 7%.
Stepwise approach to constipation
The following stepwise approach can be used when managing a patient with constipation. A systematic approach is especially important in older adults with multiple comorbidities and medications.
Step 1: Establish that the patient is suffering from constipation and identify the predominant symptom
Several definitions and tools are available for diagnosing constipation (Box 1),1,3–5 but simply put, constipation is unsatisfactory defection owing to infrequent stools or difficult or incomplete evacuation.4,6 Constipation is symptom-based and subjective, as what is “normal” in terms of bowel movements varies among individuals. While researchers and health care providers often rely on the frequency or consistency of bowel movements to define constipation, patients tend to use symptoms such as straining, hard stools, and bloating.2,6,7
Box 1. Definitions and tools for diagnosing constipation.
The Rome III Criteria for Adults3 are often cited in the literature for diagnosing constipation, but are used more in research than in clinical practice. Constipation is diagnosed when
- 25% of bowel movements are associated with at least 2 of the following symptoms, occurring in the previous 3 mo with an onset of symptoms of at least 6 mo:
- -straining
- -hard or lumpy stools
- -a sense of incomplete evacuation
- -a sense of anorectal obstruction
- -the need for manual maneuvers
- -fewer than 3 defecations per wk
loose stools are rarely present without the use of laxatives
there are insufficient criteria for irritable bowel syndrome
The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology defines constipation as symptom based, including a combination of fewer than 3 stools per wk, stool form that is mostly hard or lumpy, and difficult stool passage (need to strain or incomplete evacuation) for more than 6 mo.3
Questions to ask your patients to determine whether they are constipated
What do you mean by constipation?
How long have you had your symptoms?
What about your symptoms worries you the most
What do you hope to gain or achieve?
The Bristol Stool Scale5 is a validated tool that correlates stool consistency with colonic transit time. The scale can be helpful for patient assessment and monitoring, and as a clinical communication aid to help patients discuss their bowel movements with their physicians. The Bristol Stool Scale is available from CFPlus.* Stool types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with types 3 and 4 being the ideal stools (especially the latter), as they are easy to defecate while not containing any excess liquid. Types 5, 6, and 7 tend toward diarrhea.
Straining is often the predominant symptom in the elderly. It occurs in up to 65% of community-based individuals older than 65 years of age, and hard stools are reported in approximately 40% of these individuals.1,8 Stool frequency and consistency, along with symptoms (ie, straining), are used to confirm constipation in Mrs N.M. The patient and her daughter are able to provide this information; however, older individuals with impaired cognition or ability to communicate might present with nonspecific symptoms (eg, agitation, anorexia, or decline in function).9
Step 2: Conduct a physical examination and rule out alarm features
A visual and digital anal-rectal examination is recommended for identifying local anorectal disease, which can contribute to pelvic floor dysfunction. During the digital rectal examination, feel for masses or strictures, note sphincter tone, and rule out fecal impaction, which is particularly important in patients with dementia or who are bedridden. Negative digital rectal examination findings do not rule out a proximal impaction, and an abdominal x-ray scan is necessary when there is a high degree of suspicion. In older adults presenting with loose stools, digital rectal examination is also useful for assessing overflow incontinence due to fecal impaction. A misdiagnosis can lead to erroneous treatment with antidiarrheal medications that will worsen the condition.
Patients should also be assessed for alarm features (Box 2) that require additional investigations to rule out structural diseases (eg, colon cancer).10,11 Mrs N.M. does not have any alarm features.
Box 2. Alarm features of constipation.
Most important questions to ask your patient:
Have you had any fever, had unintentional weight loss, had blood in or on your stool, felt any masses (abdominal or rectal), had night symptoms, or had any other unexplained symptoms?
Are you vomiting?
Do you have a lot of abdominal pain?
Are you still passing gas?
Do you have a family history of colon cancer or inflammatory bowel disease?
Other alarm features:
Age older than 50 y with recent onset of symptoms
Abnormal laboratory bloodwork results (eg, anemia or iron deficiency)
Step 3: Identify and treat reversible causes
A number of diseases and conditions have been suspected of causing constipation (Box 3).2,11,12 Optimizing the management of these diseases, when possible, should be attempted in an effort to lessen or resolve the constipation.11 However, constipation is often multifactorial, especially in the elderly, and laxatives might still be required.
Box 3. Diseases and conditions that can cause constipation.
Causes of constipation
|
Mrs N.M.’s older age along with her history of diabetes and depression might all be contributing to her constipation. There is no evidence to suggest that gastrointestinal transit time is slower with increasing age, except in the frail elderly, particularly in those who are bed-bound.2,13 The higher prevalence of constipation in older individuals is thought to be owing to a greater number of diseases and medications in this population.2 The exact mechanism of diabetes-induced constipation is unclear, but it appears to have a stronger link to poor glycemic control versus the presence of autonomic neuropathy.12 Mrs N.M.’s diabetes is under control, and her most recent hemoglobin A1c level was 7%.
The link between depression and constipation is not fully understood. It might be attributed to the effect depression has on lifestyle (eg, loss of appetite, decreased activity) or the anticholinergic properties of certain antidepressants (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, paroxetine). Mrs N.M. is taking citalopram and her depression is in remission.
Step 4: Identify medications that might cause constipation
Balance the risk of constipation versus the benefit of the medications. If possible, decrease the dose, discontinue the medication, or switch to another agent with a lower incidence of constipation.
Numerous prescription and over-the-counter medications can cause or contribute to constipation (Box 4).1,4,8,14 The Beers and STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions) criteria are often used to identify medications that might be unsuitable for elderly patients.15–17 Both lists include medications that can cause or exacerbate constipation in older adults.15–17
Box 4. Examples of medications that can cause constipation.
Medications that can cause constipation:
|
Mrs N.M. is currently taking 5 medications that can contribute to constipation: amitriptyline, calcium, dimenhydrinate, metoprolol, and hydrochlorothiazide. Amitriptyline and dimenhydrinate are listed in the Beers and STOPP criteria as medications to avoid in the elderly owing to the increased risk of constipation, cognitive impairment, and other anticholinergic side effects.15,17 Mrs N.M. is talking amitriptyline and dimenhydrinate as sleep aids. She agrees to taper both of these medications and is provided with information on sleep hygiene. (Suggestions for managing insomnia in older adults are available from CFPlus.*)
An online calcium calculator18 is used to assess Mrs N.M.’s dietary calcium intake. She agrees to add 1 daily serving of calcium-rich food to her diet, which allows a reduction in her calcium supplement to 500 mg once daily. Her metoprolol and digoxin were prescribed for heart rate control secondary to atrial fibrillation. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers might be used for the same indication; however, these agents cause more constipation (1% for metoprolol vs 2% to 4% for diltiazem or 12% for verapamil)19–21 and are also listed in the Beers criteria.15 As such, her metoprolol is continued.
Theoretically, diuretics can cause constipation secondary to fluid loss.13,14 Hydrochlorothiazide causes diuresis during the first 4 to 6 weeks of therapy.22 Plasma volume and extracellular fluid normalizes after this point and antihypertensive properties of the medication are maintained by other mechanisms.22 Mrs N.M. confirms that she has been taking hydrochlorothiazide for years; therefore there is no need to change this medication with regard to her constipation.
Step 5: Recommend lifestyle changes (ie, activity, fibre and fluid intake, regular toilet routine) for patients with deficiencies (eg, low fibre or fluid intake, inactivity) and when interventions are safe
There is limited evidence that lifestyle changes resolve constipation, but it is universally accepted as a first-line approach. Studies assessing the effect of physical activity on constipation in the elderly were unable to show an improvement in bowel movements; however, exercise has been shown to enhance quality of life in this population.23 Low fluid intake has been associated with constipation in nursing home residents,24 but there was no association in older individuals from a variety of settings.25 Increasing fluid intake can be recommended for patients with low intake or who are taking bulk-forming agents, provided there are no fluid restrictions (eg, heart or kidney failure); however, there is little guidance on how much fluid should be consumed. Apple, pear, and prune juices contain sorbitol and might assist with laxation.
The studies that assessed dietary fibre in the elderly reported mixed results and were of low quality.2,10 Soluble fibre (eg, psyllium) has better evidence than insoluble fibre (eg, bran) and is preferred.10 Fibre should be titrated gradually (eg, increased by 5 g per week) to minimize gastrointestinal side effects (eg, flatulence, bloating) to up to 20 to 30 g per day.2,10 Patients with confirmed slow-transit constipation or pelvic floor dyssynergia respond poorly to a high-fibre diet and fibre supplements. Minimize dietary fibre intake in these individuals and encourage them to purée or thoroughly cook and chew fibre-rich foods.1 One randomized crossover trial compared 50 g of prunes twice a day (approximately 12 prunes, which is equal to 6 g of fibre per day and 14.7 g of sorbitol per day) to 11 g or 1 tablespoon of psyllium twice a day (6 g of fibre per day) over 8 weeks (n = 40, mean age 38 years).10,26,30 The prunes resulted in 1 extra bowel movement per week and improved stool consistency, but there was no difference in straining between the treatment arms, although both groups improved compared with baseline.10,26,27 Of note, 50 g of prunes per day equates to 120 calories.
A regular toilet routine is also recommended for elderly individuals suffering from constipation. For example, recommend that within 1 hour of waking patients engage in mild physical activity (eg, walking, swimming, yoga, tai chi) and consume a hot beverage (preferably caffeinated) and a fibre cereal. They should also have regular toileting in the morning, even without urge, and end the day with a fibre supplement.1
Mrs N.M.’s mobility is limited owing to her arthritis. She agrees to reschedule her acetaminophen (1300 mg every 12 hours) in an effort to optimize her pain management, which might in turn increase her activity level. She is encouraged to increase her dietary fibre by eating more fruit (including prunes), vegetables, and bran. Regarding her concern about water consumption and voiding, she is instructed to limit caffeinated and alcoholic beverages, which have a diuretic effect, and to increase the amount of water and juice she drinks.
Step 6: Initiate or alter laxative therapy and monitor efficacy and safety
There are no studies assessing a stepwise approach to laxative therapy. It is recommended that therapy begin with a bulk-forming agent, then an osmotic laxative followed by a stimulant laxative, if needed.10,23 There is insufficient evidence to recommend docusate for the prevention or treatment of constipation10,28; anecdotal experience suggests it might alleviate straining in selected patients (eg, those who recently underwent rectal surgery or had myocardial infarction). The Beers criteria state that mineral oil should be avoided in older adults owing to concerns about aspiration; safer alternatives are available.15
Recommendations for laxatives in older adults are similar to those used in the general adult population.2 Bulking agents (eg, psyllium) are effective in the management of constipation in patients who can drink 1 glass of water with each dose. Mrs N.M. has tried psyllium, which resulted in fecal impaction due to low fluid intake. Treatment of impaction would include manual disimpaction using 2% lidocaine gel to anesthetize and lubricate the rectum and anus.29 A mineral oil enema would be preferred over a sodium phosphate enema. Repeat mineral oil enemas daily, for up to 3 days if required.
If the stool is located higher up in the intestine and manual disimpaction and enemas are ineffective, try 2 L of oral PEG 3350 with electrolytes for 1 to 2 days30 or 1 L of oral PEG 3350 with electrolytes for 3 days.31,32 Additional laxatives (oral or suppositories) or dose adjustments to maintenance therapy might be required. Avoid bulk-forming laxatives in the setting of impaction.
The next step for patients with inadequate response to a bulking agent, or in those who have contraindications to this class, is the addition of an osmotic laxative such as lactulose or PEG 3350.10,27 Polyethylene glycol 3350 is considered to be more effective (number needed to treat [NNT] of 3) than lactulose (NNT of 4)33–35 for stool frequency per week, form of stool, relief of abdominal pain, and the need for additional laxatives.33
Mrs N.M. is currently taking PEG 3350, an osmotic laxative. Stimulant laxatives are recommended if constipation continues despite taking osmotic laxatives (NNT of 3)33; however, there is limited evidence to support routine use.1 Bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate are considered effective, but be cautious with the use of sodium picosulfate in the elderly. Mrs N.M. agrees to add a stimulant laxative (eg, a 5-mg bisacodyl tablet at bedtime 3 times a week), but questions whether her bowels will become dependent on them. Myenteric plexus or smooth muscle damage due to stimulant laxatives is rare, and it is unclear if this is due to constipation rather than laxative use.35 The prevailing opinion is that stimulant laxatives are safe to use up to 3 times per week, when fibre or osmotic laxatives have failed to provide a sufficient response (the exception would be daily stimulant laxative use for opioid-induced constipation).36–38 Chronic laxative use might potentially alter electrolytes, but data are limited. Older adults with a history of electrolyte imbalances should use laxatives with caution. Other side effects specific to stimulants include potential abdominal cramping, bloating, and nausea. Some patients might not be able to control or predict the need to defecate; therefore, caution should be used when prescribing stimulant laxatives to elderly patients who have mobility issues and risk of falls.
Newer agents available in Canada to treat constipation include linaclotide and prucalopride. Linaclotide is an intestinal secretagogue that has been studied for chronic constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in women.39 Prucalopride is a highly selective serotonin agonist (5-HT4) that stimulates gastrointestinal motility. It is officially indicated for chronic idiopathic constipation in women in whom laxatives failed to provide adequate relief.40 Both agents have only been compared with placebo, have limited evidence for use in older adults, and should be reserved for patients who have failed to respond to standard therapy prescribed by a clinician with experience in treating chronic constipation.41
Table 1 lists laxatives that can be used in older adults, and Table 2 lists laxatives to avoid or use with caution in this population.42
Table 1.
LAXATIVE TYPE | FEATURES |
---|---|
Bulk forming
|
|
Osmotic
|
|
Stimulant
|
|
Unique mechanism of action
|
|
PEG—polyethylene glycol.
Data from Kosar and Schuster.42
Table 2.
LAXATIVE | PRECAUTIONS |
---|---|
Docusate | • Lacks evidence for prevention and treatment of constipation (ie, no harm, but ineffective) |
Magnesium | • Avoid in individuals with cardiac or renal dysfunction |
Mineral oil | • Oral mineral oil should be avoided for older adults owing to concerns about aspiration (safer alternatives are available) |
Soapsuds enema | • Risk of colonic mucosa irritation |
Sodium phosphate enema | • As a purgative, avoid owing to serious electrolyte, renal, cardiovascular, and neurological concerns |
• As a laxative, avoid in individuals with dehydration, renal impairment, cardiac dysfunction, or electrolyte disturbances | |
Picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid | • Risk of electrolyte imbalance |
• Avoid for patients with renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) | |
Polyethylene glycol 3350 with electrolytes | • Avoid if patient has impaired gag reflex, is prone to aspiration or regurgitation, is semiconscious, has a risk of electrolyte imbalance, has severe renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min), or has congestive heart failure |
Data from Kosar and Schuster.42
Conclusion
Constipation is a common concern in older adults. A stepwise approach is especially important given the multiple risk factors, comorbidities, and medication-induced causes. Management of medication-induced causes, lifestyle modification, and nonpharmacologic therapies should be the first step to avoiding unnecessary drug therapy. There is limited evidence to guide the order in which the agents should be used, but often initiation of a bulk-forming agent would be first, except in those who are bedridden, are cognitively impaired, or have other contraindications. For patients with a contraindication or lack of response to a bulking agent, the initiation or addition of an osmotic agent, such as PEG 3350 or lactulose, is indicated. Patient preferences such as taste, cost, and tolerance for flatulence might guide selection of lactulose versus PEG 3350. Optimize the dose of an osmotic agent, then add a stimulant laxative if necessary, with the goal of preventing and treating constipation and avoiding fecal impaction.
The Geri-RxFiles section on the management of constipation in older adults is available from CFPlus.* Geri-RxFiles is an RxFiles initiative that focuses on drug therapy in older adults and long-term care residents.
Footnotes
The Chronic Insomnia in Older Adults document, the Constipation in Older Adults document, and the Bristol Stool Scale are available at www.cfp.ca. Go to the full text of the article online and click on CFPlus in the menu at the top right-hand side of the page.
Competing interests
RxFiles and contributing authors do not have any commercial competing interests. RxFiles Academic Detailing Program is funded through a grant from Saskatchewan Health to Saskatoon Health Region; additional “not for profit; not for loss” revenue is obtained from sales of books and online subscriptions. No financial assistance was obtained for this publication.
References
- 1.Gallegos-Orozco JF, Foxx-Orenstein AE, Sterler SM, Stoa JM. Chronic constipation in the elderly. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(1):18–25. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.349. Epub 2011 Oct 11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fleming V, Wade WE. A review of laxative therapies for treatment of chronic constipation in older adults. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8(6):514–50. doi: 10.1016/S1543-5946(10)80003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Paré P, Bridges R, Champion MC, Ganguli SC, Gray JR, Irvine EJ, et al. Recommendations on chronic constipation (including constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome) treatment. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21(Suppl B):3B–22B. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gray JR. What is chronic constipation? Definition and diagnosis. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25(Suppl B):7B–10B. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(9):920–4. doi: 10.3109/00365529709011203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.American Gastroenterological Association. Bharucha AE, Dorn SD, Lembo A, Pressman A. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):211–7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Johanson JF, Kralstein J. Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(5):599–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gandell D, Straus SE, Bundookwala M, Tsui V, Alibhai SM. Treatment of constipation in older people. CMAJ. 2013;185(8):663–70. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120819. Epub 2013 Jan 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jamshed N, Lee ZE, Olden KW. Diagnostic approach to chronic constipation in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(3):299–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paré P. The approach to diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation: suggestions for a general practitioner. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25(Suppl B):36B–40B. doi: 10.1155/2011/368189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke GR., 3rd American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):218–38. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andrews CN, Storr M. The pathophysiology of chronic constipation. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25(Suppl B):16B–21B. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Milton AG, Nigro O, Ratnaike RN. Drug-associated diarrhoea and constipation in older people. 2. Constipation. Aust J Hosp Pharm. 2000;30(5):210–3. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Branch RL, Butt TF. Drug-induced constipation. Adverse Drug React Bull. 2009;257:987–90. [Google Scholar]
- 15.American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel American Geriatrics Society updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(4):616–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.O’Mahony D, Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, Hamilton H, Barry P, et al. STOPP and START criteria: a new approach to detecting potentially inappropriate prescribing in old age. Eur Geriatr Med. 2010;1(1):45–51. [Google Scholar]
- 17.O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, O’Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2014 Oct 16; doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu145. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Osteoporosis Canada [website] Calcium calculator. Burnaby, BC: BC Dairy Association; 2015. Available from: www.osteoporosis.ca/osteoporosis-and-you/nutrition/calculate-my-calcium/. Accessed 2015 Jan 13. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Metoprolol [product monograph] Hudson, OH: Lexicomp Online; [Google Scholar]
- 20.Diltiazem [product monograph] Hudson, OH: Lexicomp Online; [Google Scholar]
- 21.Verapamil [product monograph] Hudson, OH: Lexicomp Online; [Google Scholar]
- 22.Duarte JD, Cooper-DeHoff RM. Mechanisms for blood pressure lowering and metabolic effects of thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8(6):793–802. doi: 10.1586/erc.10.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu LW. Chronic constipation: current treatment options. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25(Suppl B):22B–8B. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Robson KM, Kiely DK, Lembo T. Development of constipation in nursing home residents. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(7):940–3. doi: 10.1007/BF02237354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lindeman RD, Romero LJ, Liang HC, Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Garry PJ. Do elderly persons need to be encouraged to drink more fluids? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(7):M361–5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.7.m361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Attaluri A, Donahoe R, Valestin J, Brown K, Rao SS. Randomized clinical trial: dried plumes (prunes) vs. psyllium for constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33(7):822–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04594.x. Epub 2011 Feb 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lever E, Cole J, Scott SM, Emery PW, Whelan K. Systematic review: the effect of prunes on gastrointestinal function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40(7):750–8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12913. Epub 2014 Aug 11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health . Dioctyl sulfosuccinate or docusate (calcium or sodium) for the prevention or management of constipation: a review of the clinical effectiveness. Rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hospital Pharmacists’ Special Interest Group in Palliative Care . Care beyond cure: management of pain and other symptoms. 4th ed. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists, Association des pharmaciens des établissements de santé du Québec; 2008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bowles-Jordan J. Constipation. In: Repchinski C, editor. Patient self-care. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: Canadian Pharmacists Association; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen CC, Su MY, Tung SY, Chang FY, Wong JM, Geraint M. Evaluation of polyethylene glycol plus electrolytes in the treatment of severe constipation and faecal impaction in adults. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21(10):1595–602. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ferguson A, Culbert P, Gillett H, Barras N. New polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for the treatment for constipation and faecal impaction. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;31(Suppl 3):S249–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ford AC, Moayyedi P, Lacy BE, Lembo AJ, Saito YA, Schiller LR, et al. American College of Gastroenterology monograph on the management of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(Suppl 1):S2–26. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee-Robichaud H, Thomas K, Morgan J, Nelson RL. Lactulose versus polyethylene glycol for chronic constipation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(7):CD007570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007570.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zurad EG, Johanson JF. Over-the counter laxative polyethylene glycol 3350: an evidence-based appraisal. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27(7):1439–52. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.580339. Epub 2011 May 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A. Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(1):232–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xing JH, Soffer EE. Adverse effects of laxatives. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(8):1201–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02234645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wald A. Constipation. Med Clin North Am. 2000;84(5):1231–46. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70284-4. ix. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.e-Therapeutics.com [website] Linaclotide (Constella) [product monograph] Ottawa, ON: Canadian Pharmacists Association; [Google Scholar]
- 40.e-Therapeutics.com [website] Prucalopride (Restoran) [product monograph] Ottawa, ON: Canadian Pharmacists Association; [Google Scholar]
- 41.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [website] Prucalopride for the treatment of chronic constipation in women. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2010. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/TA211. Accessed 2015 Jan 8. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kosar L, Schuster B. RxFiles drug comparison charts. 10th ed. Saskatoon, SK: RxFiles; 2014. Constipation and laxatives. Available from: www.rxfiles.ca/rxfiles/loginrequired.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2frxfiles%2fuploads%2fdocuments%2fmembers%2fCHT-Laxatives.pdf. Accessed 2015 Jan 23. [Google Scholar]