Abstract
Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) remains a serious concern in production of poultry and affects world production of chickens and turkeys. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of DNA has been recently used for the identification of different economically important avian pathogens. The aim of this study was to develop LAMP for simple and inexpensive detection of MS strains in poultry using specifically designed primers targeting hemagglutin A (vlh) gene. The assay was conducted in a water bath for 1 h at 63 °C. The results were visualized after addition of SYBR Green® fluorescent dye. LAMP was specific exclusively for MS without cross-reactivity with other Mycoplasma species. The sensitivity of LAMP was determined as 10−1 CFU/ml and was 1,000 times higher than MS-specific polymerase chain reaction. LAMP assay was conducted on 18 MS field strains to ensure its reliability and usefulness. This is the first report on LAMP development and application for the rapid detection of MS isolated from chickens. This simple method may be applied by diagnostic laboratories without access to expensive equipment.
Keywords: Mycoplasma synoviae, Loop-mediated isothermal amplification, Rapid detection
Introduction
Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) infections are common and main cause of chronic subclinical upper respiratory disease, infectious synovitis, and airsacculitis in chickens and turkeys (Kleven 2003; Ferguson-Noel and Noormohammadi 2013). Similar to Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) MS infections have a great economical impact on the commercial poultry industry causing growth retardation, weight loss, and decreased egg production (King et al. 1973; Kleven 2003; Feberwee et al. 2008; Catania et al. 2010; Ferguson-Noel and Noormohammadi 2013). Its exact effect in layer chicken industry is still a current topic of investigations because of a recently found new clinical form called eggshell apex abnormalities described in several countries (Feberwee et al. 2009; Catania et al. 2010; Landman 2014). An effective treatment of its clinical form was successfully treated using tylosin, administered in the drinking water for 5 days (Catania et al. 2010). However, the most preferred method of MS control in poultry flocks is its eradication (Olson et al. 1956; Stipkovits and Kempf 1996; Fiorentin et al. 2003).
Lateral transmission of MS occurs by direct contact and spreads between the birds kept in the same poultry house (Kleven et al. 1975; Ewing et al. 1998; Ferguson-Noel and Noormohammadi 2013). Infection is transmitted via the respiratory tract and usually 100 % of birds become infected. In spite of the clinical form of the disease visible as joint lesions is not always observed, the infected birds remain carriers of MS (Ewing et al. 1998; Kleven 2003). MS infections most frequently occur as a chronic subclinical upper respiratory infection (Landman and Feberwee 2004). Meanwhile, not all chicken flocks showing high antibody levels against MS suffer from infectious synovitis (Jordan 1975; Kleven et al. 1975; Ferguson-Noel and Noormohammadi 2013). Some factors including age of birds, flock size and farming conditions may affect severity of MS in poultry flocks. Taking into account these aspects, rapid and efficient diagnostics of MS is an important issue not only for prevention of clinical disease progress but also infection transmission (Landman 2014).
So far, MS diagnosis has been carried out by bacteriological isolation, serological assays, or polymerase chain reaction and its modification (PCR, multiplex PCR or real-time PCR) (Lauerman et al. 1993; Hong et al. 2004; Hess et al. 2007; Feberwee et al. 2008; Hammond et al. 2009; Raviv and Kleven 2009; Dijkman et al. 2013, Fraga et al. 2013; Reck et al. 2013). The sensitivity of direct MS culturing from affected joints is low and often yields negative results, especially in the sub-chronic stage of the disease (Salisch et al. 1998). Furthermore, direct MS culturing is generally expensive and time consuming because it takes up to 28 days. In serological methods, sera collected from infected birds are commonly analysed for the presence of antibodies by serum plate agglutination (SPA) test, seldom by hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Ewing et al. 1998; Feberwee et al. 2008).
Although there are many PCR-based methods for detection of MS, they are still laborious, time consuming and require advanced laboratory equipment (Hong et al. 2004; Hammond et al. 2009; Raviv and Kleven 2009; Wetzel et al. 2010; Fraga et al. 2013; Reck et al. 2013).
An advance in detection of many different human and animal pathogens was loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) developed by Notomi et al. (2000). LAMP depends on auto-cycling strand displacement DNA synthesis performed by Bst or Bsm DNA polymerase using two or three sets of primers complementary to six or eight different regions in the gene of interest (Fu et al. 2011). LAMP uses a set of inner primers (forward FIP and backward BIP primer), outer primer (including F3 and B3) and forward and backward loop primers (FL and BL) which enable faster formation of loop and hairpin-like structures thus faster detection of specific DNA. Amplification is performed under isothermal conditions of 60–65 °C, while the final products form cauliflower-like structures with multiple overhangs (Notomi et al. 2000; Woźniakowski et al. 2011).
LAMP method has been widely applied for the diagnosis of bacteria like Shigella spp., Salmonella spp, E. coli (Fu et al. 2011) as well as viral and fungal disease in human and animals (Saito et al. 2005; Huang et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2010; Woźniakowski et al. 2012; Mair et al. 2013; Kakuya et al. 2014). Some of them are economically important poultry pathogens thus LAMP facilitated an improvement in their efficient detection.
The objective of this study was to develop LAMP for the detection of MS without the need of thermal cycler application using water bath or heating block. This is the first report on the development of LAMP for the specific MS identification.
Materials and methods
Strains
Seven reference Mycoplasma spp. strains purchased from ATCC collection comprising of M. synoviae (ATCC 25204), M. gallisepticum (ATCC 19610), M. meleagridis (ATCC 25284), M. iowae (ATCC 33552), M. anatis (ATCC 25524), M. anseris (ATCC 49234) and M. cloacale (ATCC 35276) were used. Additionally, 18 field isolates of MS collected during the years 2010–2014 were included. These strains were isolated and identified at the Department of Poultry Diseases at the National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI, Pulawy, Poland).
DNA extraction
Extraction of genomic DNA from MS reference strains and field isolates was conducted using the QIAamp Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA samples were stored at −70 °C until further analysis.
LAMP
Based on the vlhA sequence of SB5654 MS strain (Accession number: KC506824), six complementary primers were designed using Primer Explorer V4 software (NetLaboratory, Tokyo, Japan) and manual assignment. The primer sequences are listed in Table 1. LAMP reactions were conducted in 15 µl of reaction mixtures which contained: 7.5 µl of Isothermal Mastermix (OptiGene, Horsham, West Sussex, United Kingdom), 10 pM of each inner primer FIP and BIP, 2.5 pM of each outer primer F3 and B3, 5 pM of “loop” primers: LoopF and LoopB primer, 1.5 µl of deionised water and 2 µl of DNA template.
Table 1.
Primer | Sequence (5′–3′) | Length (nt) |
---|---|---|
F3 | GGTGATCAAACTCCAGCA | 18 |
B3 | TAACCGATCCGCTTAATGC | 19 |
FIP (F1c + F2) | CTCCTGGGTTTCCTGGGTTTCCCTGCTCCAACACCTGG | 38 |
BIP (B1c + B2) | TTGACCCTGTAGAGGCTGCTAGCATCTGCTGTTGTAGTTGT | 41 |
LoopF | TGGGTTTCCTGGATTTGGG | 19 |
LoopB | GCTATTGATGCTGCAACAGAAT | 22 |
F3, forward outer primer; B3, forward backward primer; FIP, forward inner primer (F1C + F2); BIP, backward inner primer (B1c + B2); LoopF, forward loop primer; LoopB, backward loop primer
The reaction mixtures were incubated at the temperature range from 56 to 70 °C for a different time (from 30 min to 105 min) and subsequently heated up to 80 °C for 2 min to inactivate the enzyme. After this step, 1 µl of 1:10 dilution of 10,000× concentrated SYBR Green® (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) was added to each sample. Results of LAMP were observed by naked-eye, under UV light or after gel electrophoresis in 2 % agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml). The length of LAMP products was compared to 100-bp DNA Ladder Plus GeneRuler™ (Thermo-scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The colour of reaction mixtures in negative controls was orange, while the positives showed green colour or greenish fluorescence. The sensitivity of LAMP was tested using nine 10-fold dilutions (106–10−2 CFU/ml) of DNA extracted from MS reference strain (ATCC 25204) with the entire titre 1 × 106 CFU/ml. The analytical specificity was tested using DNA extracted from six different Mycoplasma spp. reference strains.
PCR
PCR was conducted using MSLF and MssR primers as previously described (Wetzel et al. 2010). Reaction was carried out in a final volume of 25 µl containing 12.5 µl of Taq PCR Master Mix (EurX, Gdansk, Poland), 10 pM of each MsLF and MSsR primer and 7.5 µl deionised water. The thermal profile was 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s; 55 °C for 30 s; 72 °C for 60 s and final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were separated in 2 % agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml). The length of PCR products was compared to 100-bp DNA Ladder Plus GeneRuler™ (Thermo-scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).
Results
LAMP conditions
In order to determine the optimal conditions of LAMP, MS reference strain (ATCC 25204) was used as the target template. LAMP assays were incubated under isothermal condition between 56 and 70 °C. The specific colour change, greenish fluorescence and amplicons were observed at 66.3 °C, but in case of field MS strains, the optimal temperature was 63.0 °C. The optimal LAMP duration time was 60 min. Longer incubation up to 105 min had no influence on the final results. Therefore, the final LAMP conditions for all strains was 63 °C for 60 min then 80 °C for 2 min to deactivate the polymerase.
Analytical sensitivity and specificity of LAMP
The analytical sensitivity of LAMP showed that the detection limit was 10−1 CFU/ml of MS reference strain (ATCC 25204) and was 1,000 times higher in comparison with conducted PCR (Fig. 1). LAMP was specific only for the reference strain of MS. No colour change, fluorescence nor ladder-like pattern was observed in LAMP samples containing other species of Mycoplasma (Fig. 2). This indicated high analytical specificity of established LAMP assay for the selective detection of MS.
Field samples of MS
All 18 field isolates of MS were positive in conducted MS-specific PCR (data not shown). The similar results were obtained using developed LAMP. The colour change of reaction mixtures and specific ladder-like pattern was detected in reference MS strain as well as in all 18 field isolates (Fig. 3). This indicated on the capability of LAMP to detect both reference and field MS isolates.
Discussion
Until now, MS culturing methods, serological assays and conventional PCRs or real-time PCRs are useful in detection of MS strains (Lauerman et al. 1993; Hong et al. 2004; Hess et al. 2007; Feberwee et al. 2008; Dijkman et al. 2013). However, culturing is very laborious, time consuming and requires specific growth medium and incubation (Ratliff et al. 2014). PCR is highly specific and sensitive technique but requires at least few hours, and electrophoresis is needed to visualize the results. Indeed, it has been previously presented that multiplex PCR is a valuable tool for the detection or differentiation of MG and MS in chickens (Garcia et al. 1995; Hess et al. 2007; Hammond et al. 2009; Wetzel et al. 2010; Fraga et al. 2013). Moreover, using PCR and PCR–RFLP method targeted on single-copy domain of the N-terminal vlhA region, it is possible to differentiate field MS isolates from MS-H vaccine strain (Bayatzadeh et al. 2014). Based on 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region, it was also possible to quantify MS copy number in samples collected from chicken joints using specific qPCR technique (Raviv and Kleven 2009; Dijkman et al. 2013). An attractive alternative to traditional methods of MS detection is LAMP which is simple to set and requires no additional thermal cyclers (Woźniakowski et al. 2012). Previously, LAMP has been applied for detection of M. hyorhinis in specimens of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from pigs (Du et al. 2013). The analytical sensitivity of LAMP reached ten DNA copies per ml that was 1,000 times higher than in case of conventional PCR. Indeed, in our study, LAMP showed to be very sensitive detecting 10−1 CFU/ml of standard MS strain. Other study published by Mair et al. (2013) showed LAMP usefulness for detection of M. mycoides subsp. mycoides as the technique that may be run on a battery-driven mobile device. The efficacy of LAMP was also confirmed in the study on detection of M. pneumoniae (MP) as the lower respiratory tract pathogen in children (Ratliff et al. 2014). Similar example of LAMP application for the detection of M. wenyonii in cattle was presented by Song et al. (2012). The conducted study on development of LAMP for MS identification provides an additional evidence of the usefulness of this technique as a rapid and very sensitive method for Mycoplasma ssp. detection.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the developed LAMP showed to be a powerful and robust method for the specific and selective detection of M. synoviae. Using specific region of vlhA gene, it was possible to selectively amplify DNA of MS without cross-reactions in other samples containing DNA of Mycoplasma spp. This method presents an useful alternative for local veterinarians and small veterinary laboratories without an access to PCR technique.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Abbreviations
- AIV
Avian influenza virus
- ATCC
American Type Culture Collection
- B3
Forward backward primer
- BIP
Backward inner primer (B1c + B2)
- Bst
Thermostabile enzyme isolated from Bacillus smithii bacteria
- CAV
Chicken anaemia virus
- CFU
Colony-forming unit
- F3
Forward outer primer
- FIP
Forward inner primer (F1C + F2)
- HI
Hemagglutination-inhibition test
- IBV
Infectious bronchitis virus
- LoopF
Forward loop primer
- LoopB
Backward loop primer
- NDV
Newcastle disease virus
- MS
Mycoplasma synoviae
- MG
Mycoplasma gallisepticum
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- SPA
Serum plate agglutination
- vlh
Hemagglutin A gene of MS
References
- Bayatzadeh MA, Pourbakhsh SA, Ashtari A, Abtin AR, Abdoshah M. Molecular typing of Iranian field isolates Mycoplasma synoviae and their differentiation from the live commercial vaccine strain MS-H using vlhA gene. Br Poult Sci. 2014;55:148–156. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2013.878781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catania S, Bilato D, Gobbo F, Granato A, Terregino C, Iob L, Nicholas RA. Treatment of eggshell abnormalities and reduced egg production caused by Mycoplasma synoviae infection. Avian Dis. 2010;54:961–964. doi: 10.1637/9121-110309-Case.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dijkman R, Feberwee A, Landman WJ. Validation of a previously developed quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the detection and quantification of Mycoplasma synoviae in chicken joint specimens. Avian Pathol. 2013;42:100–107. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2013.766669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du GM, Liu MJ, Wu YZ, Xiong QY, Bai FF, Feng ZX, Shao GQ. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of Mycoplasma hyorhinis. Clin Lab. 2013;59:1363–1371. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.121223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ewing L, Cookson KC, Phillips RA, Turner KR, Kleven SH. Experimental infection and transmissibility of Mycoplasma synoviae with delayed serological response in chickens. Avian Dis. 1998;42:230–238. doi: 10.2307/1592472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feberwee A, de Vries TS, Landman WJ. Seroprevalence of Mycoplasma synoviae in Dutch commercial poultry farms. Avian Pathol. 2008;37:629–633. doi: 10.1080/03079450802484987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feberwee A, de Wit JJ, Landman WJ. Induction of eggshell apex abnormalities by Mycoplasma synoviae: field and experimental studies. Avian Pathol. 2009;38:77–85. doi: 10.1080/03079450802662772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferguson-Noel N, Noormohammadi AH. Mycoplasma synoviae infection. In: Swayne DE, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Nolan LK, Suarez DL, Nair VL, editors. Diseases of poultry. 13. Ames: Wiley; 2013. pp. 900–906. [Google Scholar]
- Fiorentin L, Soncini RA, da Costa JL, Mores MA, Trevisol IM, Toda M, Vieira ND. Apparent eradication of Mycoplasma synoviae in broiler breeders subjected to intensive antibiotic treatment directed to control Escherichia coli. Avian Pathol. 2003;32:213–216. doi: 10.1080/0307945021000071641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fraga AP, de Vargas T, Ikuta N, Fonseca AS, Celmer AJ, Marques EK, Lunge VR. A multiplex real-time PCR for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae in clinical samples from Brazilian commercial poultry flocks. Braz J Microbiol. 2013;44:505–510. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822013000200028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu S, Qu G, Guo S, Ma L, Zhang N, Zhang S, Gao S, Shen Z. Applications of loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;163:845–850. doi: 10.1007/s12010-010-9088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia M, Jackwood MW, Levisohn S, Kleven SH. Detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, M. synoviae, and M. iowae by multi-species polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. Avian Dis. 1995;39:606–616. doi: 10.2307/1591815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammond PP, Ramírez AS, Morrow CJ, Bradbury JM. Development and evaluation of an improved diagnostic PCR for Mycoplasma synoviae using primers located in the haemagglutinin encoding gene vlhA and its value for strain typing. Vet Microbiol. 2009;136:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hess M, Neubauer C, Hackl R. Interlaboratory comparison of ability to detect nucleic acid of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae by polymerase chain reaction. Avian Pathol. 2007;36:127–133. doi: 10.1080/03079450701203082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong Y, Garcia M, Leiting V, Bencina D, Dufour-Zavala L, Zavala G, Kleven SH. Specific detection and typing of Mycoplasma synoviae strains in poultry with PCR and DNA sequence analysis targeting the hemagglutinin encoding gene vlhA. Avian Dis. 2004;48:606–616. doi: 10.1637/7156-011504R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang CH, Lai GH, Lee MS, Lin WH, Lien YY, Hsueh SC, Kao JY, Chang WT, Lu TC, Lin WN, Chen HJ, Lee MS. Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of chicken anemia virus. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108:917–924. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jordan FTW. Avian Mycoplasma and pathogenicity—a review. Avian Pathol. 1975;4:165–174. doi: 10.1080/03079457509353863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kakuya F, Kinebuchi T, Fujiyasu H, Tanaka R, Kano H. Genetic point-of-care diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection using LAMP assay. Pediatr Int. 2014;56:547–552. doi: 10.1111/ped.12327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King DD, Kleven SH, Wenger DM, Anderson DP. Field studies with Mycoplasma synoviae. Avian Dis. 1973;17:722–726. doi: 10.2307/1589039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleven SH. Mycoplasma synoviae. In: Saif YM, editor. Diseases of poultry. 11. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 2003. pp. 756–765. [Google Scholar]
- Kleven SH, Fletcher OJ, Davis RB. Influence of strain of Mycoplasma synoviae and route of infection on development of synovitis or airsacculitis in broilers. Avian Dis. 1975;19:126–135. doi: 10.2307/1588963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landman WJ. Is Mycoplasma synoviae outrunning Mycoplasma gallisepticum? A viewpoint from the Netherlands. Avian Pathol. 2014;43:2–8. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2014.881049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landman WJM, Feberwee A. Aerosol-induced Mycoplasma synoviae arthritis: the synergistic effect of infectious bronchitis virus infection. Avian Pathol. 2004;33:591–598. doi: 10.1080/03079450400013170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauerman LH, Hoerr FJ, Sharpton AR, Shah SM, van Santen VL. Development and application of a polymerase chain reaction assay for Mycoplasma synoviae. Avian Dis. 1993;37:829–834. doi: 10.2307/1592037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mair G, Vilei EM, Wade A, Frey J, Unger H. Isothermal loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) for diagnosis of contagious bovine pleuro-pneumonia. BMC Vet Res. 2013;9:108. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:E63. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olson NO, Shelton DC, Bletner JK, Munro DA, Anderson GC. Studies of infectious synovitis in chickens. Am J Vet Res. 1956;17:747–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratliff AE, Duffy LB, Waites KB. Comparison of the illumigene Mycoplasma DNA amplification assay and culture for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1060–1063. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02913-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raviv Z, Kleven SH. The development of diagnostic real-time TaqMan PCRs for the four pathogenic avian mycoplasmas. Avian Dis. 2009;53:103–107. doi: 10.1637/8469-091508-Reg.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reck C, Menin A, Canever MF, Milettia LC. Rapid detection of Mycoplasma synoviae and avian reovirus in clinical samples of poultry using multiplex PCR. Avian Dis. 2013;57:220–224. doi: 10.1637/10425-101712-Reg.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saito R, Misawa Y, Moriya K, Koike K, Ubukata K, Okamura N. Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:1037–1041. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46071-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salisch H, Hinz KH, Graack HD, Ryll MA. A comparison of a commercial PCR-based test to culture methods for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae in concurrently infected chickens. Avian Pathol. 1998;27:142–147. doi: 10.1080/03079459808419315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song Q, Wang L, Fang R, Khan MK, Zhou Y, Zhao J. Detection of Mycoplasma wenyonii in cattle and transmission vectors by the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012;45:247–250. doi: 10.1007/s11250-012-0197-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stipkovits L, Kempf I. Mycoplasmoses in poultry. Rev Sci Tech. 1996;15:1495–1525. doi: 10.20506/rst.15.4.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wetzel AN, Lefevre KM, Raviv Z. Revised Mycoplasma synoviaevlhA PCRs. Avian Dis. 2010;54:1292–1297. doi: 10.1637/9349-033010-ResNote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woźniakowski G, Samorek-Salamonowicz E, Kozdruń W. Rapid detection of Marek’s disease virus in feather follicles by loop-mediated amplification. Avian Dis. 2011;55:462–467. doi: 10.1637/9668-012711-ResNote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woźniakowski G, Kozdruń W, Samorek-Salamonowicz E. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the detection of goose circovirus. Virol J. 2012;9:110. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang JL, Rui Y, Cheng AC, Wang MS, Fu LZ, Yang SQ, Zhang SH, Yang L, Xu ZY. A simple and rapid method for detection of goose parvovirus in the field by loop mediated isothermal amplification. Virol J. 2010;7:14. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]