Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1994 Mar 1;91(5):1917–1921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.5.1917

Temperature acclimation and competitive fitness: an experimental test of the beneficial acclimation assumption.

A M Leroi 1, A F Bennett 1, R E Lenski 1
PMCID: PMC43275  PMID: 8127906

Abstract

Phenotypic acclimation is generally assumed to confer an advantage in the environment that stimulates the response. To test this beneficial acclimation assumption explicitly, we investigated the consequences of temperature acclimation for the fitness of Escherichia coli at two temperatures, 32 degrees C and 41.5 degrees C. Both temperatures permit growth and long-term persistence of the genotypes in serial culture. We found that prior acclimation to 32 degrees C, relative to acclimation to 41.5 degrees C, enhanced fitness at 32 degrees C, consistent with the assumption. But prior acclimation to 41.5 degrees C actually reduced fitness at 41.5 degrees C, relative to acclimation to 32 degrees C. Hence, the assumption that acclimation always confers an advantage is demonstrated to be false. Acclimation to 41.5 degrees C did, however, improve survival at 50 degrees C, a lethal temperature. This protective response has been shown to be associated with the induction of stress proteins. The reduced competitive fitness caused by acclimation at 41.5 degrees C may reflect a physiological burden associated with expression of stress proteins when they are not needed to prevent lethal damage. Whatever the cause, acclimation to the higher temperature decreased competitive fitness at that temperature.

Full text

PDF
1917

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett A. F., Dao K. M., Lenski R. E. Rapid evolution in response to high-temperature selection. Nature. 1990 Jul 5;346(6279):79–81. doi: 10.1038/346079a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradley B. P. Genetic and Physiological Adaptation of the Copepod EURYTEMORA AFFINIS to Seasonal Temperatures. Genetics. 1978 Sep;90(1):193–205. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.1.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Delaney J. M. A cya deletion mutant of Escherichia coli develops thermotolerance but does not exhibit a heat-shock response. Genet Res. 1990 Feb;55(1):1–6. doi: 10.1017/s001667230002512x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gould S. J., Lewontin R. C. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):581–598. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Krebs H. A. The August Krogh Principle: "For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied". J Exp Zool. 1975 Oct;194(1):221–226. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401940115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindquist S. The heat-shock response. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:1151–1191. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Neidhardt F. C., Phillips T. A., VanBogelen R. A., Smith M. W., Georgalis Y., Subramanian A. R. Identity of the B56.5 protein, the A-protein, and the groE gene product of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1981 Jan;145(1):513–520. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.1.513-520.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. VanBogelen R. A., Acton M. A., Neidhardt F. C. Induction of the heat shock regulon does not produce thermotolerance in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1987 Aug;1(6):525–531. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.6.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Watson K. Microbial stress proteins. Adv Microb Physiol. 1990;31:183–223. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60122-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES