Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2014 Feb 5;5(1):39–44. doi: 10.1007/s13205-014-0197-x

Chemical composition, antioxidant activity and in vitro antibacterial activity of Achillea wilhelmsii C. Koch essential oil on methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus spp.

Seyedeh Mahsan Hoseini Alfatemi 1, Javad Sharifi Rad 2,3,4,, Majid Sharifi Rad 5,6, Sasan Mohsenzadeh 7, Jaime A Teixeira da Silva 8
PMCID: PMC4327754  PMID: 28324358

Abstract

The present study investigated the chemical composition of the essential oil (EO) from aerial parts (flowering stage) of Achillea wilhelmsii C. Koch by GC–MS. In addition, the antioxidant activity of the EO as well as its antimicrobial activity against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains was tested. Antioxidant activity was measured by the ability of the EO to scavenge 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals while the antimicrobial activity was assessed by the disc-diffusion method. In total, 52 compounds were recognized, accounting for 97.33 % of the EO. The main compounds in the EO were carvacrol (22.49 %), dihydrocarvone (13.23 %), linalool (12 %), 1,8-cineol (11.42 %), camphene (8.31 %), thymol (5.28 %), camphor (3.71 %), pulegone (2.82 %) α-terpineol (2.11 %), bornyl acetate (1.14 %), and farganol (1.01 %). The EC50 value of the EO was 0.01 and 0.08 mg/mL for the antioxidant and DPPH-scavenging ability, respectively. A. wilhelmsii EO affected methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and MRSA, but the impact was more effective on MSSA.

Keywords: Achillea wilhelmsii, Antioxidant activity, Essential oil (EO), GC–MS, MRSA, MSSA, Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction

Herbal medicines are considered to be an important natural medicine for the treatment of health conditions and diseases. The excessive and repeated use of the same drugs used in modern medicine has led to the evolution of antibiotic-resistant microbes, including Staphylococcus aureus whose emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains reduces the number of antibiotics available to treat clinical infections caused by this bacterium (Parker and Jevons 1964). S. aureus is a highly versatile pathogen with considerable importance in human medicine. S. aureus is responsible for a wide range of hospital and community-acquired infections worldwide, from skin infections and food poisoning to life-threatening situations such as toxic-shock syndrome, endocarditis, pneumonia, bacteraemia and osteomyelitis (Kim et al. 2006; Akineden et al. 2008). Traditional medicine involving herbs (or the compounds within them) can solve health and medical problems caused by S. aureus. The essential oils (EOs) (primarily from leaves) of Thymus vulgaris and Eucalyptus globulus were tested against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), both EOs to possessing antibacterial activity against MRSA, the former being more potent than the latter (Tohidpour et al. 2010). Daucus crinitus (a medicinal plant) EOs (derived from stems and leaves of wild plants) inhibited S. aureus (Bendiabdellah et al. 2013).

Achillea wilhelmsii C. Koch a perennial medicinal herb belonging to the Asteraceae family has a relatively wide distribution in different parts of Iran (Rechinger 1963; Mozaffarian 1966). It is native to Western Asia and Europe, although populations have also been discovered in North America, Australia and New Zealand (Dokhani et al. 2005). A. wilhelmsii has a wide range of reported biological activities, including antispasmodic (Yaeesh et al. 2006), antacid (Niazmand et al. 2010), antioxidant (Candan et al. 2003; Baris et al. 2006; Nemeth and Bernath 2008; Fathi et al. 2011), antihyperlipidemia (Asgary et al. 2000), antihypertensive (Niazmand et al. 2011) and antitumoral (Csupor-Loffler et al. 2009).

The hygiene industry utilizes A. wilhelmsii EO to make skin tender and soft and to treat skin inflammations using cream formulations (Pieroni et al. 2004). A. wilhelmsii is rich in sesquiterpenes, lactones flavonoids and monoterpenoids which have antioxidant activities (Jaimand and Rezaee 2001; Saeidinia et al. 2005).

The main purpose of the present study was to perform a biological examination on A. wilhelmsii C. Koch from Golmakan Khorasan Razavi, Iran by assessing the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the EO.

Materials and methods

Plant preparation and procedure

Aerial parts (stems, leaves and flowers) of the flowering stage of A. wilhelmsii C. Koch (Fig. 1a, b) were collected in June 2012 from Golmakan (36°28′44″N, 59°9′17″E), Khorasan Razavi, Iran. The plant was taxonomically identified by a botanist at the herbarium of Pharmacognosy, Department of the Faculty of Pharmacy affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences of Iran.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A. wilhelmsii C. Koch in the flowering stage used for EO analyses in this study. a Wild population; b close-up of flowering capitulum

Extraction and isolation of the EO

Plant parts were air-dried in the shade at ambient temperature (18–25 °C) for 12 days. Dried aerial parts (100 g) were cut into small pieces and hydro-distilled for 4 h using Clevenger-type apparatus. The resulting EO was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored at 4 °C until GC–MS analysis and bioassays.

GC–MS analysis

In this study, an HP 6890 N GC system coupled with an HP MSD5973 N quadruple mass spectrometer was utilized. The extracted compounds were separated on an HP-5MS capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.25 mm film thickness). Split injection:sample ratio for distillation was 50:1. The column oven temperature was programmed to rise from an initial 40 to 150 °C at 4 °C/min, and then to 240 °C at 10 °C/min. Injection temperature and ion source temperature were 240 °C. Helium was used as the carrier gas with a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The ionizing energy was 70 eV. All data were obtained by collecting the full-scan mass spectra within the scan range 50–550 amu. Compounds were identified using the Wiley 7n.L Mass Spectral Library (Wiley, New York, NY, USA). Trace compounds were defined as those detected at <0.04 % of the EO.

Antioxidant activity

Antioxidant activity was measured by the paired diene method (Lingnert et al. 1979). The antioxidant activity measured is the ability of the EO to inhibit the peroxidation of linoleic acid in which the double bond is altered to a paired diene. Each EO sample (0.01–30 mg/mL) in methanol (100 μL) was mixed with 3 mL of 10 mM linoleic acid (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) to form an emulsion in 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) in test tubes and placed in the dark at 37 °C to quicken oxidation. After incubation for 17 h, 7 mL of 70 % methanol in deionized water was added, and the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 234 nm against a blank in a Hitachi U-2001 spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). Antioxidant activity was quantified as follows: Antioxidant activity (%) = [(∆A234 of control − ∆A234 of sample)/∆A234 of control] × 100. Analyses were repeated three times. α-Tocopherol, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and ascorbic acid (Sigma) were used as standard controls.

Scavenging ability on 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radicals

The scavenging ability of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, Sigma) radicals, which was measured by the method of Shimada et al. (1992), is the ability of the EO to react quickly with DPPH radicals and to decrease most DPPH radical molecules. The assay was repeated three times. α-Tocopherol, BHA and ascorbic acid were used as standard controls. Each EO sample (0.5–30 mg/mL) in methanol (5 mL) was mixed with 1 mL of methanolic solution containing DPPH radicals, resulting in a final concentration of 0.2 mM DPPH. The mixture was shaken vigorously, left to stand for 45 min in the dark, and the absorbance was then measured at 517 nm against a blank. The scavenging ability was calculated as follows:

Scavenging ability (%) = [(∆A517 of control − ∆A517 of sample)/∆A517 of control] × 100.

EC50 value (mg/mL) is the efficient concentration at which the antioxidant activity was inhibited by 50 % and DPPH radicals were scavenged by 50 %, and was gained by interpolation from linear regression analysis.

Antibacterial study

Preparation of microorganisms

The S. aureus strains utilized in this study were clinical isolates from patients with S. aureus, obtained from the microbiological laboratory of the central hospital in Shiraz, Iran. This study was approved by the ethics committees of Zabol and Shiraz Universities of Medical Sciences. MRSA that were isolated were identified by screening tests on Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA, Torlak, Berlin, Germany) supplemented with 5 % NaCl and 1 mg/mL oxacillin-impregnated disc to isolate MRSA (Roberts et al. 2002). Finally, 10 MRSA strains and 5 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains were isolated from patients. In this study, two standards strains, ATTC 25923 (MRSA) and PTCC 1341 (MSSA), were used.

Disc-diffusion assay

Antimicrobial tests were performed by the disc-diffusion method using 100 μL of suspension (containing 2.0 × 108 CFU/mL of bacteria) dispersed evenly on MHA in sterilized Petri dishes (80 mm in diameter). To the discs (6 mm in diameter, HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India), 20, 50, 100 and 200 μL of EO and placed on the inoculated agar. The inoculated plates were maintained at 4 °C for 2 h and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring the zone of inhibition (mm) against the test bacterial (MRSA and MSSA) strains.

Statistical analysis

The EO was prepared in triplicate for chemical characterization and for antioxidant and antibacterial assays. Data was subjected to analysis of variance following a completely random design to determine the least significant difference (LSD) at P < 0.05 using SPSS v. 11.5.

Results and discussion

The composition of A. wilhelmsii essential oil

The mass spectra and retention indices (RI) were used in this study to determine the EO composition of A. wilhelmsii. In total, 52 compounds were identified accounting for 97.33 % of the EO components (Table 1). The main compounds of the EO were (in decreasing order) carvacrol (22.49 %), dihydrocarvone (13.23 %), linalool (12 %), 1,8-cineol (11.42 %), camphene (8.31 %), thymol (5.28 %), camphor (3.71 %), pulegone (2.82 %), α-pinene (2.2 %), terpineol (2.11 %), bornyl acetate (1.14 %) and farganol (1.01 %). Some compounds were detected in trace amounts (not listed in Table 1): heptanal, isopentyl isovalerate, neo-3-thujanol, cis-jasmone, elemol. The main compound in the EO of A. wilhelmsii from the Golmakan Khorasan Razavi (Iran) area was carvacrol (22.42 %). Javidnia et al. (2004) also found 25.1 % carvacrol in A. wilhelmsii oil as the main compound. The major constituent of the EO of the flowers and leaves of A. wilhelmsii from Mazandaran (Iran) province was camphor, 21.2 % and 24.1 %, respectively (Azadbakht et al. 2003). Carvacrol and camphor have no harmful effects on humans and environment (Rajendran and Sriranjini 2008; Khani and Asgari 2012). The amount of camphor in A. wilhelmsii EO collected from Kerman was 9.0 % (Afsharypuor et al. 1996) and in the EO of aerial parts from Kazeroon (Iran, Fars) province was 2.2 % (Javidnia et al. 2004). Afsharypuor et al. (1996) reported that main compound in the EO of A. wilhelmsii was caryophyllene oxide (12.5 %), much higher than that reported in our study (0.08 %). 1,8-cineol, which was found at 3.32 % of the stem EO in this study was the major constituent of the oil of A. wilhelmsii from Egypt and Turkey (Javidnia et al. 2004; Baris et al. 2006). The variations in the qualitative and quantitative composition of the EOs from different locations within the same country or from different countries are likely caused by genetic variation, growth conditions, geographic variation and analytical protocols used to assess the EOs. Previous studies showed that monoterpenes, the main part of the A. wilhelmsii EO from Golmakan, have influential insecticidal effects against stored product insects (Papachristos et al. 2004; Rajendran and Sriranjini 2008). Consequently, the A. wilhelmsii EO from Golmakan could be an important optional phytochemical control strategy without undesirable effects such as direct toxicity to humans and environmental pollution (Rajendran and Sriranjini 2008; Khani and Asgari 2012). In addition, A. wilhelmsii EO contains sesquiterpenes, lactones and flavonoids, which have in the ability to lower blood lipid levels and hypertension (Asgary et al. 2000).

Table 1.

Composition of the EO of A. wilhelmsii, identified by RI-MS*, relative to the literature

No. Name of compound RI Relative  % in EO
1 2-Methyl-butyl-acetate 885 0.43
2 Heptanal 910 0.01
3 α-Thujene 926 0.81
4 α-Pinene 935 2.22
5 Camphene 952 8.31
6 Sabinene 978 0.64
7 β-Pinene 984 0.78
8 3-Octanone 989 0.32
9 α-Phellandrene 1010 0.27
10 α-Terpinene 1015 0.73
11 p-Cymene 1028 0.81
12 1,8-Cineol 1034 11.42
13 Phenylacetaldehyde 1039 0.18
14 γ-Terpinene 1056 0.64
15 cis-Sabinene-hydrate 1064 0.16
16 trans-Linalool oxide 1076 0.29
17 Terpinolene 1086 0.31
18 α-Pinene oxide 1094 0.19
19 Linalool 1105 12.0
20 cis-Thujone 1108 0.21
21 Hotrienol 1111 0.25
22 Isopentyl isovalerate 1113 0.03
23 α-Thujone 1119 0.12
24 α-Campholenal 1123 0.32
25 Allo-Ocimene 1129 0.12
26 Isopinocarveol 1130 0.11
27 trans-Sabinol 1137 0.24
28 Camphor 1140 3.71
29 p-Menth-3-en-8-ol 1144 0.4
30 neo-3-Thujanol 1149 0.01
31 trans-β-Terpineol 1158 0.38
32 Borneol 1162 0.42
33 n-Nonanol 1166 0.01
34 4-Terpineneol 1170 0.37
35 para-Methyl-acetophenone 1175 0.12
36 para-Cymen-8-ol 1180 0.14
37 α-Terpineol 1185 2.11
38 Myrtenol 1190 0.21
39 Verbenone 1204 0.26
40 Farganol 1209 1.01
41 trans-Carveol 1218 0.12
42 Dihydrocarvone 1228 13.23
43 Pulegone 1248 2.82
44 Bornyl acetate 1252 1.14
45 Thymol 1288 5.28
46 Carvacrol 1328 22.49
47 Verbanol acetate 1369 0.25
48 cis-Jasmone 1398 0.04
49 Neryl isobutyrate 1467 0.38
50 Menthyl isovalerate 1532 0.42
51 Caryophyllene oxide 1549 0.08
52 Elemol 1568 0.01

RI retention indices relative to C6–C24 n-alkanes on the DB-5 column; MS mass spectrum (as indicated by the Wiley 7n.L Mass Spectral Library)

Antioxidant activity and scavenging ability

The results for antioxidant activity and scavenging ability on DPPH radicals of the EOs assayed are summarized in Table 2. The efficiency of antioxidant activity and scavenging ability is inversely related with their EC50 values. The antioxidant activity EC50 values were 0.08, 0.05, 4.07 and 0.01 mg/mL for α-tocopherol, BHA, ascorbic acid and A. wilhelmsii EO, respectively. The scavenging ability EC50 values was 0.11, 0.07, 9.09 and 0.58 mg/mL for α-tocopherol, BHA, ascorbic acid and A. wilhelmsii EO, respectively. The antioxidant activity of A. wilhelmsii EO was stronger than three standards tested (Table 2), which could be used for the treatment of human diseases to remove free radicals (Dharmendra et al. 2009).

Table 2.

EC50 values (mg/mL) of the A. wilhelmsii EO in two assays

Antioxidant activity (mg/mL) Scavenging ability (mg/mL)
A. wilhelmsii EO 0.01 ± 0.02 d 0.08 ± 0.08 d
α-Tocopherol 0.08 ± 0.01 b 0.11 ± 0.01 b
BHA 0.05 ± 0.01 c 0.07 ± 0.01 c
Ascorbic acid 4.03 ± 0.07 a 9.09 ± 0.06 a

Values are mean of ±SD of three replicates. Mean values with different letters within a column are significantly different (P < 0.05; LSD)

Antibacterial activity

The results of antibacterial activity of EOs (Table 3) showed that the maximum level of EO (200 μL) was inhibitory (largest zone of inhibition) against MSSA (22.56 mm) and MRSA (14.22 mm). The inhibitory activity against MSSA was greater than against MRSA. The EOs of A. wilhelmsii had a more negative impact on MSSA than MRSA (Table 3). Monoterpenes, which are rich in the EO of A. wilhelmsii, have powerful antibacterial effects (Unlu et al. 2002; Sokmen et al. 2004; Prabuseenivasan et al. 2006). In addition, phenolic and flavonoid compounds, also present in the EO of A. wilhelmsii, have antimicrobial activity (Stojanovic et al. 2005; Eleyinmi 2007; Yaghoubi et al. 2007; Mothana et al. 2009).

Table 3.

Antibacterial activity of the EO of plants against MSSA standard, MSSA (n = 5), MRSA standard, and MRSA (n = 10) strains Diameter of the zone of inhibition (mm)

EO volume (μl) MSSA standard MSSA (n = 5) MRSA standard MRSA (n = 10)
25 14.01 ± 1.01 11.56 ± 1.04 6.25 ± 0.38 7.55 ± 0.28
50 16.01 ± 0.01 15.84 ± 0.89 12.1 ± 0.28 9.00 ± 0.33
100 14 ± 1.38 18.49 ± 1.23 12 ± 1.01 12.46 ± 1.07
200 27 ± 0.079 22.56 ± 0.45 19 ± 0.017 14.22 ± 0.11

Values are mean of ±SD of three replicates

Conclusion

In this study, chemical composition, antioxidant activity and in vitro antibacterial activity of A. wilhelmsii L. Essential oil on methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus spp. was investigated. A. wilhelmsii C. Koch has emerged as an important medicinal plant. Its EO could be commercialized for its antioxidant, insecticidal and antibacterial applications, or used in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic or perfume industries.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Professor Hildebert Wagner Center of Pharma-Research, Institute of Pharmacy LM-University of Munich, Germany, for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

A. wilhelmsii

Achillea wilhelmsii

BHA

Butylated hydroxyanisole

EO

Essential oil

DPPH 1

1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl

GC–MS

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

MRSA

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MSSA

Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus

S. aureus

Staphylococcus aureus

References

  1. Afsharypuor S, Asgaryand S, Lockwood GB. Constituents of the essential oil of Achillea wilhelmsii from Iran. Planta Med. 1996;62(1):77–78. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akineden O, Hassan AA, Schneide E, Usleber E. Enterotoxigenic properties of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from goats’ milk cheese. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;124(2):211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asgary S, Naderi GH, Sarrafzadegan N, Mohammadifard N, Mostafavi S, Vakili R. Antihypertensive and antihyperlipidemic effects of Achillea wilhelmsii. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 2000;26(3):89–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Azadbakht M, Morteza-Semnani K, Khansari N. The essential oil composition of Achillea wilhelmsii C. Koch. leaves and flowers. J Med Plants. 2003;2:55–59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baris O, Culluce M, Sahin F, Ozer H, Kilic H, Ozkan H, Skmen M, Zbek T. Biological activities of the essential oil and methanol extract of Achillea biebersteinii Afan. (Asteraceae) Turk J Biol. 2006;30:65–73. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bendiabdellah A, Amine Dib MEL, Meliani N, Muselli A, Nassim D, Tabti B, Costa J. Antibacterial activity of Daucus crinitus essential oils along the vegetative life of the plant. J Chem. 2013;1:7–12. [Google Scholar]
  7. Candan F, Unlu M, Tepe B, Daferera D, Polissiou M, Sokmen A, Akpulat HA. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil and methanol extracts of Achillea millefolium subsp. millefolium Afan. (Asteraceae) J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;87(2–3):215–220. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Csupor-Loffler B, Hajdu Z, Zupko I, Rethy B, Falkay G, Forgo P, Hohmann J. Antiproliferative effect of flavonoids and sesquiterpenoids from Achillea millefolium S.L. on cultured human tumour cell lines. Phytother Res. 2009;23(5):672–676. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dharmendra D, Prashant K, Jain SK. In-vitro anti-oxidant activity of the ethyl acetate extract of gum guggul (Commiphora Mukul) Biological Forum. 2009;1(1):32–35. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dokhani S, Cottrell T, Khajeddin J, Mazza G. Analysis of aroma and phenolic components of selected Achillea species. Plant Food Hum Nutr. 2005;6:55–62. doi: 10.1007/s11130-005-5100-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eleyinmi AF. Chemical composition and antibacterial of Gongronema latifolium. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007;8:352–358. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fathi H, Lashtoo Aghaee B, Ebrahimzadeh MA. Antioxidant activity and phenolic contents of Achillea wilhelmsii. Pharmacol Online. 2011;2:942–949. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jaimand K, Rezaee MB. Comparative study of the essential oils of three Achillea species from Iran. J Essent Oil Res. 2001;13:354–356. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2001.9712231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Javidnia K, Miri R, Sadeghpour H. Composition of the volatile oil of Achillea wilhelmsii c. Koch from Iran. Daru. 2004;12:2–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Khani A, Asgari J. Insecticide activity of essential oils of Mentha longifolia, Pulicaria gnaphalodes and Achillea wilhelmsii against two stored product pests, the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum and the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus. J Insect Sci. 2012;12:102–107. doi: 10.1673/031.012.7301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim JS, Song W, Kim HS, Cho HC, Lee KM, Choi MS, Kim EC. Association between the methicillin resistance of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, their staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) subtype classification and their toxin gene profiles. J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;56:289–295. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lingnert H, Vallentin K, Eriksson CE. Measurement of antioxidative effect in model system. J Food Process Preserv. 1979;3:87–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.1979.tb00574.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mothana R, Lindequist U, Geraenert R, Bednarski P. Studies of the in vitro anticancer, antimicrobial and antioxidant potentials of selected Yemeni medicinal plants from the island Soqotra. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009;9:7–11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-9-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mozaffarian V (1966) A dictionary of Iranian plant names: Latin–English–Persian. Farhang Mo’aser
  20. Nemeth E, Bernath J. Biological activities of yarrow species (Achillea spp.) Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(29):3151–3167. doi: 10.2174/138161208786404281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Niazmand S, Khooshnood E, Derakhshan M. Effects of Achillea wilhelmsii on rat’s gastric acid output at basal, vagotomized, and vagal-stimulated conditions. Pharmacogn Mag. 2010;6(24):282–285. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.71791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Niazmand S, Esparham M, Rezaee SA, Harandizadeh F. Hypotensive effect of Achillea wilhelmsii aqueous-ethanolic extract in rabbit. Aveicennal J Phytomed. 2011;1:51–56. [Google Scholar]
  23. Papachristos DP, Karamanoli KI, Stamopoulos DC, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U. The relationship between the chemical composition of three essential oils and their insecticidal activity against Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) Pest Manag Sci. 2004;60(5):514–520. doi: 10.1002/ps.798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Parker MT, Jevons MP. A survey of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Postgrad Med J. 1964;40:170–178. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.40.Suppl.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pieroni A, Quave CL, Villanelli ML, Mangino P, Sabbatini G, Santini L, Boccetti T, Profili M, Ciccioli T, Rampa LG, Antonini G, Girolamini C, Cecchi M, Tomasi M. Ethnopharmacognostic survey on the natural ingredients used in folk cosmetics, cosmeceuticals and remedies for healing skin diseases in the inland Marches. Central-Eastern Italy. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;91(2–3):331–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Prabuseenivasan S, Jayakumar M, Ignacimuthu S. In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant essential oils. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006;6:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rajendran S, Sriranjini V. Plant products as fumigant for stored product insect control. J Stored Prod Res. 2008;44(2):126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2007.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rechinger KH. Flora Iranica. Wien: Akademische Druke- U. Verlagsanstatt; 1963. [Google Scholar]
  29. Roberts S, Young H, Faulkner S, Renshaw S, Morris AJ. Value of broth cultures in detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. NZ Med J. 2002;115:1–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Saeidinia S, Gohari AR, Yassa N, Shafiee A. Composition of the volatile oil of Achillea conferta DC. from Iran. Daru. 2005;13:34–36. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shimada K, Fujikawa K, Yahara K, Nakamura T. Antioxidative properties of xanthan on the autoxidation of soybean oil in cyclodextrin emulsion. J Agric Food Chem. 1992;40:945–948. doi: 10.1021/jf00018a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sokmen A, Sokmen M, Daferera D, Polissiou M, Candan F, Unlu M, Akpulat HA. The in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the essential oil and methanol extracts of Achillea biebersteini Afan. (Asteraceae) Phytother Res. 2004;18:451–456. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stojanovic G, Radulovic N, Hashimoo T, Palic R. In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts of four Achillea species: the composition of Achillea clavennae L. (Asteraceae) extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;101:185–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tohidpour A, Sattari M, Omidbaigi R, Yadegar A, Nazemi J. Antibacterial effect of essential oils from two medicinal plants against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Phytomedicine. 2010;17(2):142–145. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2009.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Unlu M, Daferera D, Donmez E, Polissiou M, Tepe B, Sokmen A. Compositions and the in vitro antimicrobial activities of the essential oils of Achillea setacea and Achillea teretifolia (Compositae) J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;83:117–121. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00218-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yaeesh S, Jamal Q, Khan AU, Gilani AH. Studies on hepatoprotective, antispasmodic and calcium antagonist activities of the aqueous-methanol extract of Achillea millefolium. Phytother Res. 2006;20(7):546–551. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yaghoubi SMJ, Ghorbani GR, Soleimanianzad S, Satari R. Antimicrobial activity of Iranian propolis and its chemical composition. Daru. 2007;15:24–48. [Google Scholar]

Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES