Skip to main content
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance logoLink to Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
. 2015 Feb 3;17(Suppl 1):P189. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P189

Correlation of electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities with myocardial fibrosis and scar in late enhancement

Olaf C Grebe 1,, Christa Voemel 2, Bernward K Kurtz 2, Ernst G Vester 1
PMCID: PMC4328813

Background

Late Gadolinium enhancement represents a widely employed method for detecting myocardial scarring e.g. after myocardial infarction or for myocardial Inflammation. A frequent finding is slight basal septal enhancement as well as intramyocardial enhancement, mostly referred as myocardial fibrosis. Less is known about the impact on myocardial conduction and a possible correlation to ECG findings such as atrioventricular node conduction delay and bundle branch blockations.

Methods

For 81 consecutive patients (mean age 63,5yrs, range 20-84yrs, 17 female) referred for magnetic resonance cardiac (MRI) including a late gadolinium enhancement study scans were anonymized and correlated to an ECG performed within one week before or after the MRI. A 1.5T Siemens Sonata with TIM upgrade was used. Scanning protocol comprised short- and long axis cine mode and a perfusion study with Gd-DOTA and/or T1 and T2 TSE as well as 2d and 3d IR short axis sequences for late enhancement. The latter was analysed visually for the study by two experienced operators and subdived as (1) normal, (2) intramyocardial fibrosis, (3) subendocardial or transmural ischemic scar and (4) bright acute inflammation or postmyocardial subepicardial enhancement pattern. The ECGs had been re-evaluated by an experienced cardiologist.

Results

The baseline data between the 4 groups was similar (data given as mean values and range):

group 1 (normal): 30 patients (37%), LVEF 62% (17-79%), EDVI 73ml (40-222ml), ventricular septum thickness (IVS) 11mm, age 57yrs;

group 2 (fibrosis): 30 patients (37%), LVEF 58% (20-76%), EDVI 72ml (45-142ml), IVS 13mm, age 68yrs;

group 3 (ischemic scar): 15 patients (19%), LVEF 51% (30-76%), EDVI 82ml (36-152ml), IVS 11mm, age 69yrs;

group 4 (myocarditis): 6 patients (7%), LVEF 55% (42-71%), EDVI 82ml (57-122ml), IVS 10mm, age 44yrs.

Atrial fibrillation was present in 10%, 20%, 27%, and 0% respectively.

ECG findings are presented in Table 1. Group 2-3 differed significantly from each other (p<0.016) as well as the fibrosis vs. the normal group p<0.01).

Table 1.

ECG findings

normal ECG LBBB RBBB HB IVCD AVB
normal 83% 0% 17% 10% 0% 7%
fibrosis 47% 10% 10% 13% 27% 20%
ischemic scar 47% 20% 7% 0% 27% 20%
myocarditis 33% 0% 50% 17% 0% 0%

LBBB/RBBB: left/right bundle branch blockation; HB: left hemi blockation; IVCD intraventricular conduction delay, AVB: atrioventricular node block (all grade I)

Conclusions

Abnormal ECG findings such as AV conduction delay and bundle branch blockation are significantly correlated to myocardial scarring or fibrosis in late enhancment studies.

Funding

None.


Articles from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES