Abstract
Background:
Patients with early stage breast cancer with same treatment strategy can have markedly different outcomes. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/nue) gene amplification or the subsequent overexpression of protein has been proved to be associated with patient's outcome and response to anthracyclins-based regimens.
Objectives:
This study assessed prognostic value of HER2/nue marker in patients with early stage breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclins-based regimens.
Materials and Methods:
Fifty tissue samples from patients with primary breast cancer of moderate risk receiving sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclins-based regimens were assessed to evaluate HER2/nue gene status (quantified by Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization) retrospectively. Besides, correlation of HER2/neu with patients' characteristics and outcome was studied.
Results:
HER2/neu amplification was identified in 19 (38%) of 50 patients. No significant difference regarding HER2/neu status was seen in clinic pathological characteristics of patients. Although Progression Free Survival (PFS) was shorter in HER2 overexpressed group, but uni/multivariate analysis adjusted for HER2 overexpression, nodal involvement, hormone receptor status, age and tumor size revealed no significant predictive and/or prognostic value for HER2 regarding PFS.
Conclusions:
This study on a limited number of patients treated with adjutant anthracyclins-based regimens, revealed that HER2/neu is not a unique strong predictor for outcome, thus according to combination of HER2/neu status and other clinical factors, it is necessary to distinguish patients at high risk of recurrence.
Keywords: Breast Neoplasms, Oncogenes, Biological Markers
1. Background
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among females worldwide and the first malignancy affecting Iranian women (1-4). It is assumed that behavior, prognosis, and treatment response are very different in this non-homogenous disease (5). Despite all efforts in early diagnosis, treatment and biomarker identification, about 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer would experience recurrence (6). One reason could be drug resistance leading to treatment failure and finally responsible for breast cancer mortality (7). It is believed that breast cancer in the Middle East (where Iran is located in) may be unusually aggressive with an unfavorable prognosis (8, 9). Adjuvant chemotherapy, accepted as the main treatment including anthracyclins-based regimens, has been used widely to prevent relapse (10), prolong progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer (11), but sometimes these drugs have serious toxic effects (12). Amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) oncogene has been identified in 20-30% of invasive breast cancer tumors (13, 14). Prognosis and responsiveness to anthracyclins-based therapy could be affected by HER2/neu receptor protein overexpression and gene amplification (15, 16). Some investigators believed that the relation between HER2/neu amplification and responsiveness to anthracyclines might be relevant to topoisomerase IIα. Anthracyclines are topoisomerase inhibitors, and TOP2A is located closely to the HER2/neu gene on chromosome (17). Generally, several investigators concluded that HER2/neu abnormalities, (either gene amplification or protein overexpression) are associated with a worse prognosis (18). In addition to systemic treatment development, many investigators have a desire to know and classify tumors with poor prognosis, to administer appropriate therapy, and improve patients' outcome. Research has almost focused on comparing anthracyclins to non-anthracyclins based regimens related to HER2/neu over expression (19, 20).
2. Objectives
In this study, we evaluated HER2/neu prognostic value and outcome of patients with HER2/neu protein overexpression or gene amplification compared to those without such abnormalities when using anthracyclins-based regimens. It may be possible to find a way to characterize prognostic value of HER2/neu, which can identify tumors with more aggressive behavior in Iranian patients.
3. Materials and Methods
This survey was a retrospective single institute study on 50 patients with early stage breast cancer from August 1997 to January 2011 referred to Iranmehr hospital, Tehran, Iran. Informed written consent was obtained prior to enrolling patients in the study according to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences ethics and scientific committees and was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. All patients underwent modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and were treated with postoperative anthracyclins-based chemotherapy. Two anthracyclins containing regimens were administered; CAF (N = 28) versus TAC (N = 22) regimens. Administration dosages were: 5-Fu 500 mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 in CAF (21) and Docetaxel 75 mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for TAC (22), repeated every three weeks. Two hundred files of patients with breast cancer were reviewed and 50 cases were included. Inclusion criteria were MRM (Marketing Resource Management) surgery, primary early stage breast cancer who had one to three nodes involvement or had high risk node negative disease (which was defined as primary tumor greater than 2 cm in size or greater than 1 cm for tumors both estrogen [ER] and progesterone receptors [PR] negative). Exclusion criteria were metastatic disease or chemotherapy with other regimens. Neither of patients received adjuvant trastuzumab. Formalin paraffin embedded tissue blocks of breast tumors removed during modified radical mastectomy were obtained from archived files of the Pathology Department at Iranmehr Hospital. For hormone receptors and HER2/neu status determining, immunohistochemical methods (IHC) alone (for ER and PR), or IHC and fluorescent in situ hybridization test (FISH) was used. The avidin-biotin-peroxidase method was used for IHC staining. Antibodies were obtained from DAKO Company (Glostrup, Denmark). As recommended ASCO/CAP (23) consensus panel and ESMO guideline (24), first we assessed HER2/neu gene status by immunohistochemistry (IHC). If IHC was 2+, tumors block underwent confirmatory FISH test. HER-2/neu positivity was defined as samples with more than 10% cells staining 3+ by IHC or 2+ by IHC confirmed by FISH (a ratio of HER-2/neu gene/chromosome 17 ≥ 2.0). HER2/neu expression was determined by Hercept TestTM DAKO test. Breast cancer was classified according to WHO classification of breast tumors. In post-treatment follow-up, patients underwent physical examination at least once every four months for the first three years and every six months thereafter. Annual mammograms, bone scans and chest X-rays were performed if necessary.
3.1. Statistical Analysis
To examine differences in ordinal variables (tumor size, lymph node involvement, age, and stage) between the two groups (HER2/neu overexpressed in compare with the other), non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare nominal variables between the two groups when appropriate. Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess adjusted parameters regarding progression free survival (PFS) in uni/multivariate analysis and their 95% CIs (confidence intervals). For all statistical tests, 5% level was used as the cutoff for statistical significance. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 16. As most patients were alive and much exclusion data we did not perform analysis for overall survival. Mean of Kaplan Meier's survival estimates and curves were obtained and the log-rank test was used to assess the significance of differences of PFS between the two study groups. PFS was calculated from date of registration to date of progression or death (Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1. Primary Breast Cancer Estrogen Receptor Immunohistochemical Staining Was Positive.

Figure 2. Primary Breast Cancer Progesterone Receptor Immunohistochemical Staining Was Positive.

4. Results
Among 50 patients included in this study, 42 (84%) invasive ductal carcinomas, 6 (12%) invasive lobular carcinomas and 3 (6%) other pathologies were diagnosed (Figure 3). Age of patients ranged from 26-64. The mean age was 48.4 years. HER2/neu overexpression was found in 38% (N = 19) cases. Slightly more cases received adjuvant chemotherapy with CAF regimen (N = 28) than TAC regimen (N = 22). No patient developed symptomatic cardiac dysfunction or irreversible asymptomatic decreases in left ventricular ejection fraction to 50% or lower. During analysis of postoperative staging of studied cases, the largest group of patients was found in group with stage IIA (Table 1). Lymph node status was assessed during the study, which 46% of them were involved (N = 23). There was no significant difference in any of patients' characteristics between the two groups including tumor size, lymph node involvement, chemotherapy protocol, age, ER/PR status, post-menopausal status, stage and pathology. Clinic pathological characteristics were shown in Table 1. Number of patients without lymphadenopathy involvement was higher in non-over expressed group, but it was not statistically significant (Table 1). In HER2/neu overexpressed tumors, 57.9% were ER negative, but in the other group 32.3% were ER negative. Fifteen patients developed a documented relapse (30%). Mean of PFS in HER2 overexpressed group and the other group were 31.6 ± 3.2 and 80.9 ± 17.4 months, respectively (HR of relapse = 0.977[0272-0.351], P = 0.602, Figure 4). We also evaluated the correlation of relapse and PFS with some parameters (listed in Table 2) (For some Parameters, multivariate analysis was not possible because model coefficients and hazard ratio (HR) were not calculated. these parameters were used simple in multivariate analysis). In uni/multivariate analysis, neither of them remained significant for PFS means (Table 2).
Figure 3. Diagram Details of Materials Used for This Study.
Table 1. Clinic pathological Characteristics of Patients a,b.
| HER2/neu Amplification gene Group; N = 19 | HER2/neu Not Amplification gene Group; N = 31 | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.914 | ||
| 9 Years | 1 (5.3) | 3 (9.7) | |
| 30-39 Years | 2 (10.5) | 4 (12.9) | |
| 40-49 Years | 8 (42.1) | 10 (32.3) | |
| 50 Years | 8 (42.1) | 14 (45.2) | |
| Stage | 0.494 | ||
| IA | 1 (5.3) | 1 (3.2) | |
| IB | 2 (10.5) | 3 (9.7) | |
| IIA | 7 (36.8) | 16 (51.6) | |
| IIB | 6 (31.6) | 9 (29.0) | |
| IIIA | 3 (15.8) | 2 (6.5) | |
| ER | 0.153 | ||
| Positive | 9 (47.4) | 21 (67.7) | |
| Negative | 10 (52.6) | 10 (32.3) | |
| PR | 0.151 | ||
| Positive | 8 (42.1) | 21 (67.7) | |
| Negative | 11 (57.9) | 10 (32.3) | |
| Chemotherapy Protocol | 0.675 | ||
| CAF | 11 (57.9) | 17 (54.8%) | |
| TAC | 8 (42.1) | 14 (45.2%) | |
| Node + | 8 (47.4) | 15 (48.4%) | 0.944 |
| Number of LAP c | 0.633 | ||
| 0 | 10 (52.6) | 16 (51.6) | |
| 1 | 4 (21.1) | 4 (12.9) | |
| 2 | 4 (21.1) | 6 (19.4) | |
| 3 | 1 (5.3) | 5 (16.1) | |
| Tumor size d | 0.765 | ||
| 1 Cm | 2 (10.5) | 2 (6.5) | |
| 1-1.99 Cm | 9 (47.4) | 18 (58.1) | |
| 2-4.99 Cm | 6 (31.6) | 9 (29.0) | |
| 5 Cm | 2 (10.5) | 2 (6.5) | |
| Post-menopausal status | 10 (52.6) | 14 (45.1) | 0.833 |
| Pathology | 0.28 | ||
| Invasive ductal carcinoma | 19 (100) | 23 (74.3) | |
| Invasive lobular carcinoma | 0 | 6 (19.3) | |
| Others | 0 | 2 (6.4) |
a Abbreviations: HER-2/ neu, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; TAC; TAC regimen including (Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide); CAF regimen including (Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide).
b Data are presented as No. (%).
c Number of nodes involved: 0, node negative; 1,1 positive node; 2, 2 positive nods; 3, 3 positive nodes.
d 1 cm, tumors less than 1 cm in size; 1.99 cm, tumors between 2 and 4.99 cm in maximum diameter; > 5 cm, tumors >5 cm in maximum diameter.
Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve From the Onset of Recurrence for the Effect of Her2/Neu Gene Amplification on Progression Free Survival.
Non-significant shortened PFS was observed in HER2/neu overexpressed group (P = 0.602).
Table 2. Uni/ Multivariate Analysis Regarding the Mean of Progression Free Survival a,b.
| Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| HER 2/neu | 1.370 (0.417-4.501) | 0.604 | 0.977 (0.272-3.510) | 0.971 |
| Age | 0.999 | |||
| ≤ 29/ ≥ 50 | - | - | - | - |
| 30-39/ ≥ 50 | 0.960 (0.158-5.849) | |||
| 40-49/ ≥ 50 | 1.071 (0.316-3.636) | |||
| Age | 1.021 (0.956-1.090) | 0.530 | 1.017 (0.940-1.099) | 0.680 |
| ER + | 0.411 (0.137-1.233) | 0.113 | 0.350 (0.096-1.281) | 0.113 |
| Node +c | 1.191 (0.385-3.685) | 0.762 | 1.399 (0.377-5.192) | 0.616 |
| Tumor Size | 0.193 | |||
| ≤ 1 Cm/ ≥ 5 Cm | ||||
| 1-1.99 Cm/ ≥ 5 Cm | 0.223 (0.044-1.141) | |||
| 2-4.99 Cm/ ≥ 5 Cm | 0.116 (0.015-0.874) | |||
| Tumor Size d | 1.473 (0.900-2.413) | 0.124 | 1.567 (0.921-2.664) | 0.098 |
| Chemotherapy protocol CAF/TAC | 0.788 (0.226-2.749) | 0.708 | 0.525 (0.116-2.368) | 0.402 |
a Abbreviations: HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.
b TAC; TAC regimen including (Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide); CAF: CAF regimen including (Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide); ER +: ER positive.
c Lymph nodes involvement (For some parameters, multivariate analysis was not possible because model coefficients and hazard ratio (HR) were not calculated. These parameters were used simple in multivariate analysis).
d 1cm, tumors less than 1 cm in size; 1.99 cm, tumors between 2 and 4.99 cm in maximum diameter; > 5 cm, tumors > 5 cm in maximum diameter.
5. Discussion
In this retrospective study, we found no correlation between HER2/neu amplification and prognosis of early stage breast cancer treated by anthracyclins-based regimens in Iranian women. Most studies performed to evaluate the HER2/neu status were conducted in western countries and compared prognostic value of HER2/neu in anthracyclins-based to non anthracyclins-based regimens. In different studies performed in other countries, HER2/neu amplification was found in 20-30% of breast malignancies (13, 14), but in some countries such as Lebanon the higher percentage was reported (25). HER2/neu overexpression in this study is accordance with data from Egypt (25).
In patients aged 50 years, HER2/neu overexpression was found in 39.2%, whereas in women over 50 it was detected in 36.2%. It was shown in other studies that in a group of younger female breast cancer, worse prognosis was associated with overexpression of HER2/neu, which leads to more aggressive tumor behavior (26). Tumor size, hormone receptor status, HER2 overexpression and expression of p53 have been identified previously as indicators in breast cancer (27, 28) and correlation of HER2 gene overexpression with other parameters indicative of disease relapse has been shown (29, 30). We designed this study in a HER2-unselected population to examine whether above findings could be repeated. Although ER/PR negative status and tumor size > 5 cm were more prevalent in HER2/neu amplified group, it was not statistically significant. Neither of tumor characteristics remained significant regarding HER2/neu status in both uni and multivariate analyses. This finding was verified by similar results from Huang et al. (30) and Badowska-Kozakiewicz et al. (31). PFS in HER2/neu non-over expressed group was very much, but not statistically significant in our study. Some researchers showed that in early breast cancer HER2/neu overexpression is a major and potentially risk of relapse (3, 33-38), while others did not (31, 39). Although our results are not robust but it seems consistent with the report of Tubbs et al. (11). Nevertheless, high levels of HER2/neu amplification had a correlation with worse disease free survival, but some studies suggested that anthracycline-based therapy improved the outcome of patients with HER2 amplification profile (24). Thus in our population of patients who all received anthracyclins-based regimens, the overall outcome would be worse in absence of treatment but with anthracyclins-based therapy more benefit was obtained. Paradoxical results between our results and others could be explained by several factors such as technical and methodological differences or different dosages of drugs and small sample size. However, evaluation of predictive and/or prognostic relevance of this biomarker supposed to perform prospective randomized clinical trial. Finally, this article suggested that distinguishing patients at high risk of recurrence must be based on combination of HER2 status and other clinical factors. Our data does not provide additional information how to improve management of patients with early stages breast cancer and high risk of recurrence. If it is supposed that they would receive standard anthracyclins-based regimens, higher percentage of HER2/neu overexpression in Iranian breast tumors calls for attention to detect HER2/neu in all breast samples.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all patients who participated in the study and helped us. Besides, it is necessary to thank Dr. Naser Etamdi Moghadam.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions:Conception and design: Dr. Hanifeh Mirtavoos Mahyari and Dr. Adnan Khosravi. Collection and assembly of data: Dr. Zeinab Mirtavoos Mahyari and Negin Khosravi. Manuscript writing: Dr. Hanifeh Mirtavoos Mahyari and Dr. Zahra Esfahani Monfared.
References
- 1.Sadjadi A, Nouraie M, Mohagheghi MA, Mousavi-Jarrahi A, Malekezadeh R, Parkin DM. Cancer occurrence in Iran in 2002, an international perspective. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2005;6(3):359–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):212–36. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Assi HA, Khoury KE, Dbouk H, Khalil LE, Mouhieddine TH, El Saghir NS. Epidemiology and prognosis of breast cancer in young women. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5 Suppl 1:S2–8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.05.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zaha DC, Lazar E, Lazureanu C. Clinicopathologic features and five years survival analysis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2010;51(1):85–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Del Mastro L, Bruzzi P, Nicolo G, Cavazzini G, Contu A, D'Amico M, et al. HER2 expression and efficacy of dose-dense anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(1):7–14. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Morales-Vasquez F, Hortobagyi GN. Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;608:1–22. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74039-3_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kakarala M, Wicha MS. Implications of the cancer stem-cell hypothesis for breast cancer prevention and therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(17):2813–20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Al Tamimi DM, Shawarby MA, Ahmed A, Hassan AK, AlOdaini AA. Protein expression profile and prevalence pattern of the molecular classes of breast cancer--a Saudi population based study. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Runnak MA, Hazha MA, Hemin HA, Wasan AA, Rekawt RM, Michael HD. A population-based study of Kurdish breast cancer in northern Iraq: hormone receptor and HER2 status. A comparison with Arabic women and United States SEER data. BMC Womens Health. 2012;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hortobagyi GN. Treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(14):974–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810013391407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tubbs R, Barlow WE, Budd GT, Swain E, Porter P, Gown A, et al. Outcome of patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy as a function of HER2 and TOP2A status. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(24):3881–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative G. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1687–717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ross JS, Slodkowska EA, Symmans WF, Pusztai L, Ravdin PM, Hortobagyi GN. The HER-2 receptor and breast cancer: ten years of targeted anti-HER-2 therapy and personalized medicine. Oncologist. 2009;14(4):320–68. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fountzilas G, Valavanis C, Kotoula V, Eleftheraki AG, Kalogeras KT, Tzaida O, et al. HER2 and TOP2A in high-risk early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant epirubicin-based dose-dense sequential chemotherapy. J Transl Med. 2012;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paik S, Bryant J, Tan-Chiu E, Yothers G, Park C, Wickerham DL, et al. HER2 and choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-15. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(24):1991–8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.24.1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brase JC, Schmidt M, Fischbach T, Sultmann H, Bojar H, Koelbl H, et al. ERBB2 and TOP2A in breast cancer: a comprehensive analysis of gene amplification, RNA levels, and protein expression and their influence on prognosis and prediction. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(8):2391–401. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pritchard KI, Shepherd LE, O'Malley FP, Andrulis IL, Tu D, Bramwell VH, et al. HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(20):2103–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Petrelli F, Barni S. Role of HER2-neu as a prognostic factor for survival and relapse in pT1a-bN0M0 breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature with a pooled-analysis. Med Oncol. 2012;29(4):2586–93. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0201-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Spears M, Kenicer J, Munro AF, Bartlett JM. Type I receptor tyrosine kinases as predictive or prognostic markers in early breast cancer. Biomark Med. 2008;2(4):397–407. doi: 10.2217/17520363.2.4.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pritchard KI, Messersmith H, Elavathil L, Trudeau M, O'Malley F, Dhesy-Thind B. HER-2 and topoisomerase II as predictors of response to chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):736–44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Martin M, Villar A, Sole-Calvo A, Gonzalez R, Massuti B, Lizon J, et al. Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(6):833–42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martin M, Segui MA, Anton A, Ruiz A, Ramos M, Adrover E, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(23):2200–10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(1):18–43. doi: 10.1043/1543-2165(2007)131[18:ASOCCO]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aebi S, Davidson T, Gruber G, Castiglione M, Esmo Guidelines Working Group Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v9–14. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.el AT, Khalifa A, Kamel AS. Immunohistochemical expression of p53 and c-erbB2 proteins in breast cancer in Egypt. Anticancer Res. 2000;20(3B):2145–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nikolenyi A, Sukosd F, Kaizer L, Csorgo E, Voros A, Uhercsak G, et al. Tumor topoisomerase II alpha status and response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Oncology. 2011;80(3-4):269–77. doi: 10.1159/000329038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Park HS, Kim S, Kim K, Yoo H, Chae BJ, Bae JS, et al. Pattern of distant recurrence according to the molecular subtypes in Korean women with breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hartmann LC, Ingle JN, Wold LE, Farr GH, Jr., Grill JP, Su JQ, et al. Prognostic value of c-erbB2 overexpression in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer. Results from a randomized adjuvant treatment protocol. Cancer. 1994;74(11):2956–63. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941201)74:11<2956::aid-cncr2820741111>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tetu B, Brisson J. Prognostic significance of HER-2/neu oncoprotein expression in node-positive breast cancer. The influence of the pattern of immunostaining and adjuvant therapy. Cancer. 1994;73(9):2359–65. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940501)73:9<2359::aid-cncr2820730919>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang HJ, Neven P, Drijkoningen M, Paridaens R, Wildiers H, Van Limbergen E, et al. Association between tumour characteristics and HER-2/neu by immunohistochemistry in 1362 women with primary operable breast cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(6):611–6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.022772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Badowska-Kozakiewicz AM, Sobol M, Patera J, Kozlowski W. Immunohistochemical evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and estrogen and progesterone receptors in invasive breast cancer in women. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(3):466–71. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.31010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tiwari RK, Borgen PI, Wong GY, Cordon-Cardo C, Osborne MP. HER-2/neu amplification and overexpression in primary human breast cancer is associated with early metastasis. Anticancer Res. 1992;12(2):419–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen L, Romond E, Chokshi S, Saeed H, Hodskins J, Stevens M, et al. A prognostic model of early breast cancer relapse after standard adjuvant therapy and comparison with metastatic disease on initial presentation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(2):565–72. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2265-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235(4785):177–82. doi: 10.1126/science.3798106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dubsky PC, Gnant MF, Taucher S, Roka S, Kandioler D, Pichler-Gebhard B, et al. Young age as an independent adverse prognostic factor in premenopausal patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002;3(1):65–72. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2002.n.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Piccart M, Lohrisch C, Di Leo A, Larsimont D. The predictive value of HER2 in breast cancer. Oncology. 2001;61 Suppl 2:73–82. doi: 10.1159/000055405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mlineritsch B, Ressler S, Greil R. The role of biomarkers in the choice of therapy in breast cancer. Memo Mag Eur Med Oncol. 2012;5(2):101–4. doi: 10.1007/s12254-012-0027-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goncalves A, Vassilakopoulou M, Spano JP. [Small HER2-positive breast cancer: which prognosis and which adjuvant treatment?]. Bull Cancer. 2013;100(9):847–56. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2013.1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Di Leo A, Isola J, Piette F, Ejlertsen B. A meta-analysis of phase III trials evaluating the predictive value of HER2 and topoisomerase II alpha in early breast cancer patients treated with CMF or anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy. Cancer Res . 2009;69(2):99s. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS-705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]


