Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Nurs Econ. 2014 Jan-Feb;32(1):32–39.

Nurse manager job satisfaction and intent to leave

Nora E Warshawsky 1,*, Donna S Havens 2
PMCID: PMC4330008  NIHMSID: NIHMS660053  PMID: 24689156

Abstract

Background

The nurse manager role is critical to staff nurse retention and often the portal to senior nursing leadership, yet little is known about nurse managers' job satisfaction and career plans. The purpose of this study was to describe nurse managers' job satisfaction and intent to leave.

Methods

An electronic survey was used to collect data from 291 nurse managers working in U.S. hospitals.

Findings

Seventy percent were satisfied or very satisfied with their jobs and 68% were either likely or very likely to recommend nursing management as a career choice. Seventy-two percent of these nurse managers were also planning to leave their positions in the next five years. The four most common reasons reported for intent to leave included burnout, career change, retirement, and promotion. Burnout was the most common reason cited by the entire sample but the fourth most common reason for leaving cited by those nurse managers who were planning to leave and also satisfied or very satisfied with their positions.

Conclusions

Recommendations for nursing leaders include evaluating the workload of nurse managers, providing career counseling, and developing succession plans. Additional research is needed to understand the determinants and consequences of nurse manager job satisfaction, intent to leave, and turnover.

Keywords: nurse managers, job satisfaction, retention, intent to leave


Nurse managers create and sustain healthy environments that support professional nursing practice and staff nurse job satisfaction (Duffield, Roche, Blay, & Stasa, 2011). Hospital staff nurses credit the quality of their relationships with their nurse managers as a deciding factor to remain in their positions (Cohen, Stuenkel, & Nguyen, 2009; McGuire & Kennerly, 2006). Since relational leadership styles have consistently been associated with better nurse and unit outcomes (Cummings et al., 2010), strategies to build effective nurse manager-unit staff relationships should be a high priority. Interpersonal relationships are developed over time; therefore, it is critical that we entice effective nurse managers to remain in their positions.

Nurse managers who build effective relationships with their staff nurses and are committed to their organizations may also play an important role in leadership succession because the nurse manager role is often the portal to senior nursing leadership. To build effective leadership succession plans, nurse executives need to know more about nurse managers' satisfaction with their current roles and understand their career plans. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine nurse managers' job satisfaction and intent to leave their positions.

Review of Literature

Although job satisfaction, retention, and intent to stay among staff nurses have been well-researched, relatively few studies explore these concepts among nurse managers (Brown, Fraser, Wong, Muise, & Cummings, 2013; Lee & Cummings, 2008). Job satisfaction in Canadian nurse managers was influenced by perceptions of organizational support, the quality of relationships with their supervisors, and structural and psychological empowerment (Spence Laschinger, Purdy, Cho, & Almost, 2006; Spence Laschinger, Purdy, & Almost, 2007). Job satisfaction among nurse managers working in the U.S. was influenced by supervisor and physician agreement regarding the nurse managers' use of their time (Bunsey, Defazio, Pierce, & Jones, 1991) and power to make changes to their work environment (Hurley, 2005). Ringerman (1990) reported that decentralization resulted in higher nurse manager job satisfaction and by contrast, Wells (1990) did not find a significant difference in job satisfaction between nurse managers working in centralized versus decentralized organizations. Kath, Stichler, and Ehrhart (2012) found that autonomy and job predictability enhanced job satisfaction and reduced nurse managers' intent to quit. Whether measured as empowerment, decentralization, or autonomy, nurse managers' job satisfaction seemed to be influenced by their ability to exercise control over their practice.

Building on the studies of job satisfaction, Parsons and Stonestreet (2003) reported that nurse manager retention was influenced by quality communication with their supervisors, empowerment to make decisions, effective staff management systems, professional development, work-life balance, quality of patient care, and adequate compensation. Mackoff (2011) interviewed 30 nurse managers who were in their positions for at least 5 years and known for achieving quality outcomes. Her findings were similar to those reported by Stonestreet and Parsons (2003). Nurse managers reported that an empowered nursing workforce, high expectations for achieving quality outcomes, mission-driven decision making, professional development, and the freedom to take risks were important organizational features that influenced their decisions to stay in their positions (Mackoff, 2011). In addition to the organizational cultures, the nurse managers in Mackoff's study also reported a need to maintain a good balance between their work and home life, have evenly distributed workloads, formal education and socialization to their role, and receive adequate compensation. Similarly, Laschinger, Wong, Grau, Read, and Pineau Stam (2012) found that leadership practices, structural empowerment, and perceived organizational support increased Canadian nurse managers' intent to stay in their positions. Although the U.S. studies used convenience samples of nurse managers recruited from three (Parsons & Stonestreet, 2003) to six (Mackoff, 2011) U.S. medical centers, Laschinger et al. (2012) surveyed 788 first-line nurse managers working in 66 hospitals across Canada. The limited number of studies conducted signals the need for more research to understand the current state of nurse manager job satisfaction and retention.

Methods

Design and Sample

This study was a secondary analysis of self-administered electronic survey data collected from nurse managers working in U.S. acute care hospitals in March 2011. Nurse managers were defined as the first-line manager of a patient care area(s) with 24-hour responsibility for the operational, fiscal, and performance accountability. Nurse managers who only managed out-patient clinics or were in their positions for less than three months were excluded. All nurse managers who were members of the North Carolina Organization of Nurse Leaders (NCONL; n=87) and the American Organization of Nurse Executives (AONE, n=1,125) were invited to participate in the study. Members of NCONL were recruited using email addresses provided the organization. Members of AONE were recruited through an advertisement in the organization's biweekly electronic newsletters. Of the 291 respondents, 108 (44%) were members of AONE only, 26 (11%) were members of NCONL only, 4 (2%) were members of both AONE and NCONL, and 105 (43%) were members of neither organization. The response rates were 13% for AONE members and 44% for NCONL members. An a priori power analysis for the parent study determined that the sample size was adequate to detect significant relationships.

Approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Instruments

Five items were developed by the author to measure nurse manager job satisfaction and anticipated turnover. These items were modeled after items developed by Aiken et al. (2001) to measure job satisfaction and anticipated turnover in staff nurses and Jones, Havens, and Thompson (2008) to measure job satisfaction and anticipated turnover in nurse executives. Respondents were asked to rate their satisfaction with being a nurse manager on a 6-point Likert scale (1 = Highly Dissatisfied to 6 = Highly Satisfied), likelihood to recommend nursing management as a career choice on 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very Unlikely to 5 Very Likely), and satisfaction with time spent with staff on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very Dissatisfied to 5 Very Satisfied). Participants were also asked how long they planned to remain in their current positions. Response categories included 0 – 2 years, 3 – 5 years, 5 – 7 years, 7 – 9 years, and greater than 10 years. Participants who were planning to leave their positions in the next 5 years were asked to indicate their primary reason (Table 1). Demographic data included age, gender, race, highest nursing degree, additional non-nursing degrees, years of nursing experience, years of nurse manager experience, and years in current nurse manager position. The questionnaire was reviewed by experts in nursing leadership and job satisfaction research.

Table 1. Questionnaire items.

Item Response Options
How satisfied are you with being a Nurse Manager? 1=Very Dissatisfied to 6=Very Satisfied
How likely are you to recommend nursing management as a career choice to other nurses? 1=Very Unlikely to 5=Very Likely
How satisfied are you with the amount of time that you spend working with your nursing staff? 1=Very Dissatisfied to 5=Very Satisfied
How Long do you plan to remain in your current position? 0-2 years
3-5 years
5-7
years
7-9 years
10+ years
If you plan to leave your current position in the next 0-5 years, indicate your primary reason. Burnout
Career Change
Education Plans
Family Concerns
Financial Reasons
Retirement
ther, Specify

Procedure

The questionnaire was developed and distributed using Qualtrics© (Provo, UT) software. Recruitment notices with the URL link to the questionnaire were emailed twice a week to nurse managers who were NCONL members. The AONE participants were recruited through the twice weekly electronic newsletters sent by AONE to its members. The survey was fielded for three weeks.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.2 (Cary, NC) to run descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, t-tests, and chi-square tests for differences.

Findings

The average nurse manager in this sample was a 47 year-old Caucasian female with 9.1 (SD = 7.3) years of nursing management experience and 4.9 (SD = 4.7) years in their current positions. Forty-nine percent of the participants reported more years of nursing management experience than years in their current nurse manager positions. Most held a baccalaureate degree in nursing (n = 151, 51.97%) or a master's degree in nursing (n = 100, 34.4%) and 2 (0.7%) had a doctorate in nursing. Forty percent of respondents also held non-nursing degrees. After accounting for additional non-nursing degrees, 46% (n = 135) reported a baccalaureate, 43.7% (n = 129) reported a master's degree, and 1% (3) reported a doctorate as their highest overall level of education. When compared with data reported in the 2008 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (NSSRN) (Health Resources and Services Administration, 2010), age, race and gender were commensurate. The education levels reported by these nurse managers were generally more advanced than managers and administrators surveyed in the NSSRN. The average span of control was 60.8 (SD = 39.2) full-time equivalents (FTEs) across 1.7 units (SD = 1.0). In some cases, the nurse managers were responsible for as many as 220 FTEs across seven patient care areas. (Table 2)

Table 2. Sample Demographics and Comparison 2008 National Sample Survey of RN's data.

VARIABLE n MEAN (SD) PERCENT RANGE NSSRN 2008
Age 286 47.4 (8.8) 26 - 68 45.5a
Gender
 Female 262 90.3 92.7%b
 Male 28 9.7 7.3%
Organization Membership
 AONE only 108 44
 NCONL only 26 11
 Both AONE & NCONL 4 2
 Neither AONE nor NCONL 105 43
Highest Nursing Education b
 Diploma 13 4.5 11.9%
 Associate's 25 8.6 33.6%
 Bachelor's 151 51.9 34.8%
 Master's 100 34.4 19.6%c
 Doctorate 2 0.7
Highest Overall Education
 Diploma 6 2.1
 Associate's 18 6.2
 Bachelor's 135 46.4
 Master's 129 44.3
 Doctorate 3 1.0
Years of Nursing Experience 287 21.3 (10.3) 2 - 45
Years of Nurse Manager Experience 290 9.1 (7.3) 0 - 35
Current Unit Tenure 284 4.9 (4.7) 0 - 30
Span of Control
 FTE's 261 60.8 (39.2) 7 - 241
 Number of Nursing Units 291 1.7 (1.0) 1 - 7

NSSRN = National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (HRSA, 2010)

a

Sample includes all RN's working in nursing;

b

Subsample includes only those in management and administrative positions;

c

Master's and Doctorate combined in NSSRN report

Less than one-third (n = 84, 29%) were Very Satisfied and 41% (n = 119) were Satisfied with their positions as nurse managers. In addition, most were either Very Likely (n = 79, 27%) or Likely (n = 123, 41%) to recommend nursing management as a career. When asked about satisfaction with the amount of time available to work with staff, there was more variability: 28% (n = 81) were either Very Dissatisfied or Dissatisfied, 20% (n = 57) were Neutral, and 52% (n = 151) were either Satisfied or Very Satisfied.

When asked about intent to leave their current positions, 25% (n = 74) reported that they planned to leave within the next 2 years and another 37% (n = 107) planned to leave their positions within the next 3 to 5 years (Figure 1). Two hundred and ten (72%) participants provided a primary reason for intent to leave their position in the next 5 years. The top four reasons reported were burnout or stress (n = 63, 30%), career change (n = 56, 27%), retirement (n = 47, 22%), and promotion (n = 32, 15%). (Table 3)

Figure 1. Intent to Leave Current Position.

Figure 1

Table 3. Reasons for Intent to Leave Current Position in 5 years.

Reasons All participants with intent to leave in 5 years (n = 210) Participants Very Satisfied or Satisfied who intend to leave in 5 years (n = 146)

n % n %
Burnout 63 30 15 10
Career Change 56 27 33 23
Retirement 47 22 36 25
Promotion 32 15 29 20
Education Plans 23 11 13 9
Family Concerns 19 9 8 5
Financial Reasons 4 2 1 0
Other 21 10 11 8

Chi-square and t-tests were used to analyze differences between those planning to leave their positions in the next five years and those who planned to stay longer than five years. Compared with nurse managers who planned to leave their positions within the next five years, those who planned to stay in their positions for more than five years were more satisfied with their jobs (χ2= 25.59, df = 3, p = <.001) and more satisfied with the amount of time they spend with their staff (χ2 = 8.28, df = 2, p = .02). Nurse managers planning to stay in their positions were also more likely to recommend nursing management as a career option (χ2 = 9.18, df = 2, p = .01) and they supervised 11.5 fewer FTEs (t = -2.13, df = 259, p = .03). The most common reasons cited by the nurse managers who were Satisfied or Very Satisfied with their jobs but also planned to leave in the next five years included retirement (n = 36, 25%), career change (n = 33, 23%), promotion (n = 29, 20%), and burnout (n = 15, 10%). (Table 3)

When compared with those who planned to stay, those who planned to leave within the next five years did not significantly differ in age (t = 1.67, df = 183.68, p = .10), highest degree (χ2 = 3.15, df = 2, p = .20), years of nursing experience (t = 0.88, df = 285, p = .38), years of nurse manager experience (t = -0.44, df = 288, p = .66), unit tenure (t = 1.02, df = 108.75, p = .31), membership in either AONE or NCONL (χ2 = 1.77, df = 1, p = .20), or hospital size (χ2 = 3.81, df = 3, p = .30).

Discussion

The nurse managers who participated in this study were experienced, well-educated, and managed large spans of control. On average, they had 9 years of experience as nurse managers with about 5 years in their current positions. Roughly half were in at least their second nurse manager position. Furthermore, 62% were planning to leave their current positions in the next 5 years. This suggests that for this sample the average “life span” of a nurse manager for any one position is about 5 years. Our findings indicate that many nurse managers leave their positions and nursing management; however some leave their positions for another nurse manager position. What is not clearly understood is what compels nurse managers to leave one nurse manager position to assume another nurse manager position.

Although 70% of the participants were either Satisfied or Highly Satisfied with their jobs and Likely or Highly Likely to recommend nursing management as a career, an equal number reported that they were also planning to leave their jobs within the next 5 years. While staff nurse job satisfaction is associated with higher levels of retention (Cummings et al., 2010; Currie & Carr Hill, 2012),this was not the case for this sample of nurse managers, suggesting the need to further explore the distinctive features of nurse manager practice. Given the unique role of the nurse manager, evidence that explains staff nurse job satisfaction (Hayes, Bonner, & Pryor, 2010; Lu, Barriball, Zhang, & While, 2012) and intent to stay (Cowden & Cummings, 2012; Tourangeau, Cummings, Cranely, Ferron, & Harvey, 2010) may not apply to nurse managers.

Burnout (30%), career change (27%), retirement (22%), and promotion (15%) were the top 4 reasons reported for expressed intent to leave. Although burnout was the most cited reason by all of the nurse managers planning to leave their jobs within the next five years, retirement was the most common reason cited by the nurse managers who were both Highly Satisfied or Satisfied and planning to leave within the next five years. Nurse managers who planned to stay in their positions for five years or more were more satisfied with their jobs, more likely to recommend nursing management to others, more satisfied with the amount of time they spent with staff, and had smaller spans of control. The image conveyed by nurse managers who plan to retire from their positions should send a positive message to others who may be considering a nursing management position. Given that retirement is an event that can be anticipated, smooth succession planning can take place.

Those expressing intent to leave because of burnout are unlikely to present a favorable impression of the role to others. This could have negative effects on recruitment. When nurse managers experience burnout and are less likely to recommend nursing management as a career, the nurse administrator may have more difficulty filling nurse manager vacancies. Efforts should be proactively taken to prevent nurse manager burnout by implementing strategies to reduce workload demands. Assessing and reducing large spans of control seems a logical place to begin. Shirey et al. (2010) found that a pair of nurse managers was able to manage large spans of control—up to 350 employees—with less reported stress than those managing smaller spans of control alone. While she reported that the co-manager model led to reduced stress levels, this observation was based on a single pair of co-managers. Based on the evidence reported by staff nurses, smaller spans of control increase their job satisfaction (Cummings et al., 2010) and engagement (Cathcart et al., 2004). While there is no clear evidence defining the optimal span of control or unit level management structure, evidence does suggest that larger spans of control are a source of stress for nurse managers and dissatisfaction for staff nurses.

The nurse managers who planned to stay in their positions were also more likely to be satisfied with the amount of time they spend with their staff, which might reflect more than simply the number of direct reports. Perhaps evaluating the number and importance of meetings and reporting requirements might increase the time available to managers to interact with, coach and mentor staff. Evidence also suggests that staff nurses are more satisfied with their jobs when they perceive their managers to be supportive and practice relational leadership styles (Cowden, Cummings, & Profetto-McGrath, 2011; Cummings et al., 2010). Leaders who use relational leadership styles establish relationships with their staff and inspire them to achieve organizational goals (Cummings et al., 2010). Relationships are developed over time through consistent patterns of behavior. If nurse managers do not have a sufficient amount of time to engage in meaningful interactions with their staff, the findings from this study suggest that nurse managers will be more likely to leave their positions.

Twenty-seven percent of those planning to resign within the next five years planned to change careers and 15% planned to assume an administrative role. These findings are consistent with the literature that employees desire challenges in their work (Crawford, LePine, & Rich, 2010). Organizational leaders should capitalize on this interest and provide developmental opportunities for nurse managers who want to assume executive leadership roles. Promoting from within the organization's nurse manager ranks could build commitment to the organization while providing a smooth transition between leaders at the nursing unit level. Providing career counseling services to nurse managers might facilitate transitions into other non-line organizational roles. Alternately, when seasoned nurse managers are looking for a new career challenge, rather than leaving their nurse manager positions they could be asked to identify an organizationally relevant project of interest to them to pursue. Another strategy to capitalize on their leadership expertise would be to encourage them to apply for leadership roles within their professional nursing organizations. In academe, senior faculty are offered sabbaticals to pursue scholarly activities to develop new insights, techniques, or collaborative relationships that advance their work. Similarly, seasoned nurse managers could be offered sabbaticals to pursue relevant fellowships, for example, in leadership, quality and safety, or health policy.

Limitations

A limitation of this study was the use of a cross-sectional design and convenience sampling strategy. The sample was limited to acute care nurse managers only. Thus, the sample may not be representative of the nurse manager population at large, and may affect the generalizability of the findings. That said, with the exception of the education level, the participants in this study were comparable in age, race, and gender with the respondents reported in the NSSRN.

Recommendations for Nursing Leaders

This study highlights the need for nurse leaders to assess the current state of nurse manager job satisfaction, intent to leave, and turnover in their organizations. A critical analysis of nurse manager turnover and vacancy rates may highlight positions that need to bereconceptualized. Nurse manager job satisfaction was associated with likelihood to recommend nursing management, thus, a dissatisfied nurse manager may paint a negative picture of the role to staff nurses considering nursing management. By restructuring problematic positions, staff nurses may be more willing to consider nurse manager opportunities and in turn, reduce the time to fill vacancies.

Evaluating the workload of nurse managers and the growing expectations of the role is an important second step. Developing creative unit management strategies may reduce burnout and turnover among nurse managers and cascading effects on unit staff as well. Nurse manager workload is a complex phenomenon and consists of more than the number of direct reports and patient care areas managed. Workload evaluations should also consider committee involvement, report requirements, and the complexity of the patient care services offered within each nurse managers' scope of practice. As unit management strategies are redesigned, they should be evaluated for effects on staff, patient, organizational, and financial outcomes.

Nurse leaders need to establish career development programs for nurse leaders at all levels of the organization. Succession planning, career development, and mentoring programs have the potential to keep nurse leaders engaged with their work and committed to the organization. Opportunities to strengthen leadership skills may exist outside of the organization.

The nurse manager role will evolve as organizations respond to changes in health policy and the current economic environment. As nurse leaders develop and test innovative management and leadership strategies, they should disseminate their findings to the broader nursing leadership community.

Recommendations for Future Research

This study identified that expressed intent to leave among nurse managers is commonplace. More theory-guided research is needed to understand the antecedents and consequences of nurse manager job satisfaction, intent to leave, and turnover in acute care hospitals and other clinical settings. While parallels may exist between reasons for turnover in staff nurses and nurse managers, there may be important differences between the experiences of the two groups. For example, evidence suggests that the practice environment is a strong predictor of job satisfaction in staff nurses (Cowden & Cummings, 2012; Lu et al., 2012). The Nurse Manager Practice Environment Scale (Warshawsky, Rayens, Lake, & Havens, 2013) was recently developed to gauge the quality of the practice environments of nurse managers and facilitate studies testing this link in nurse managers.

A second direction for future research is to understand the impact of nurse manager turnover on staff, patient, organizational, and financial outcomes. The evidence suggests that nurse managers create positive unit level work environments through the use of relational leadership styles (Cummings et al., 2010). Turnover in the nurse manager role disrupts the relationships and the practice environment. Studies that examine the repercussions of nurse manager turnover are needed to build an evidence-based business case to drive changes in the management structures in health care organizations.

Conclusion

The findings from this study yielded new information about the current state of nurse manager job satisfaction and intent to leave their positions. In general, nurse managers are satisfied with their jobs yet many are actively planning to leave their positions. Some nurse managers plan to leave for continued growth opportunities and to retire, while others are planning to leave due to burnout and stress. These findings underscore the importance of succession planning for the anticipated turnover due to retirements. For those looking to ascend the leadership career ladder, senior nursing leaders should engage nurse managers in career counseling sessions and develop mentoring programs to prepare nurse managers for advancement opportunities within the organization. Furthermore, senior nursing leaders should assess nurse manager workload and expectations of this role. It is possible that reductions in workload will result in increased longevity of the current nurse manager workforce. Perhaps the most important lesson from this study is the need for additional research to understand the determinants of job satisfaction in nurse managers.

Acknowledgments

The first author was a participant in the 2012 NLN Scholarly Writing Retreat, sponsored by the NLN Foundation for Nursing Education.

Funding: This publication was partially supported by grant no. T32NR008856 (B. Mark, principal investigator) from the National Institute of Nursing Research. Contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health.

Contributor Information

Nora E. Warshawsky, College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.

Donna S. Havens, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

References

  1. Aiken L, Clarke S, Sloane D, Sochalski J, Busse R, Clarke H, et al. Shamian J. Nurses' reports on hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs. 2001;20(3):43–53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown P, Fraser K, Wong C, Muise M, Cummings G. Factors influencing intentions to stay and retention of nurse managers: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management. 2013;21:459–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bunsey S, Defazio M, Pierce L, Jones S. Nurse manager expectations and job satisfcation. Applied Nursing Research. 1991;4(1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cathcart D, Jeska S, Karnas J, Miller S, Pechacek J, Rheault L. Span of control matters. Journal of Nursing Adminsitration. 2004;34(9):395–399. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200409000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen J, Stuenkel D, Nguyen Q. Providing a healthy work environment. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2009;24(4):308–315. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3181a4699a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cowden T, Cummings G. Nursing theory and concept development: A theoretical model of nurses' intentions to stay in their current positions. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2012;68(7) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cowden T, Cummings G, Profetto-McGrath J. Leadership practices and staff nurses' intent to stay: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management. 2011;19(4):461–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crawford E, LePine J, Rich B. Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;95(5):834–848. doi: 10.1037/a0019364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cummings G, MacGregor T, Davey M, Lee H, Wong C, Lo E, et al. Stafford E. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010;47(3):363–385. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Currie E, Carr Hill R. What are the reasons for high tunover in nursing? A discussion of presumed causal factors and remedies. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2012;49(9):1180–1189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Duffield CM, Roche MA, Blay N, Stasa H. Nursing unit managers, staff retention and the work environment. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2011;20(1/2):23–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayes B, Bonner A, Pryor J. Factors contributing to nurse job satisfaction in the acute hospital setting: a review of recent literature. Journal of Nursing Management. 2010;18(7):804–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Health Resources and Services Administration. The registered nurse population: Findings from the 2008 national sample survey of registered nurses. 2010 Retrieved from http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/rnsurvey/2008/nssrn2008.pdf.
  14. Hurley M. A Rogerian exploration of nurse managers' experience of job satisfaction, stress, and power. Visions. 2005;13(1):12–26. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones C, Havens D, Thompson P. Chief nursing officer retention and turnover: Results of a national survey. Journal of Healthcare Management. 2008;53(2):89–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kath L, Stichler J, Ehrhart M. Moderators of the negative outcomes of nurse manager stress. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2012;42(4) doi: 10.1097/NNA.1090b1013e31824ccd31825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee H, Cummings G. Factors influencing job satisfaction of front line nurse managers: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management. 2008;16(7):768–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu Hong, Barriball LLouise, Zhang Xian, While Allison. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses revisited: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2012;49:1017–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mackoff B. Nurse manager engagment. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. McGuire E, Kennerly S. Nurse managers as transforamtional and transactional leaders. Nursing Economics. 2006;24(4):179–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Parsons M, Stonestreet J. Factors contributing to nurse manager retention. Nursing Economics. 2003;21(3):120–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ringerman E. Characteristics associated with decentralization experienced by nurse managers. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1990;12(3):336–346. doi: 10.1177/019394599001200306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shirey M, Fisher M, McDaniel A, Doebbeling B, Ebright P. Understanding nurse manager stress and work complexity: Factors that make a difference. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2010;40(2):82–91. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181cb9f88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spence Laschinger H, Purdy N, Cho J, Almost J. Antecedents and Consequences Of Nurse Managers' Perceptions Of Organizational Support. Nursing Economic$ 2006;24(1):20–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Spence Laschinger H, Wong Carol A, Grau A, Read E, Pineau Stam L. The influence of leadership practices and empowerment on Canadian nurse manager outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management. 2012;20(7):877–888. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01307.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Spence Laschinger H, Purdy N, Almost J. The impact of leader-member exchange quality, empowerment, and core self-evaluation on nurse manager's job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2007;37:221–229. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000269746.63007.08. doi:10.1097.01.NNA.0000269746.63007.08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tourangeau A, Cummings G, Cranely L, Ferron E, Harvey S. Determinants of hospital nurses intention to remain employed: Broadening our understanding. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010;66(1):22–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05190.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Warshawsky N, Rayens MK, Lake S, Havens D. The nurse manager practice environment scale: Development and psychometric testing. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2013;43(5):250–257. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182898e4e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wells G. Influence of organizational structure on nurse manager job satisfaction. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 1990;14(4):1–8. doi: 10.1097/00006216-199001440-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES