Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Feb 17;5:8521. doi: 10.1038/srep08521

Application of IL-36 receptor antagonist weakens CCL20 expression and impairs recovery in the late phase of murine acetaminophen-induced liver injury

Patrick Scheiermann 1,2, Malte Bachmann 1, Lorena Härdle 1, Thomas Pleli 3, Albrecht Piiper 3, Bernhard Zwissler 2, Josef Pfeilschifter 1, Heiko Mühl 1,a
PMCID: PMC4330543  PMID: 25687687

Abstract

Overdosing of the analgesic acetaminophen (APAP, paracetamol) is a major cause of acute liver injury. Whereas toxicity is initiated by hepatocyte necrosis, course of disease is regulated by mechanisms of innate immunity having the potential to serve in complex manner pathogenic or pro-regenerative functions. Interleukin (IL)-36γ has been identified as novel IL-1-like cytokine produced by and targeting epithelial (-like) tissues. Herein, we investigated IL-36γ in acute liver disease focusing on murine APAP-induced hepatotoxicity. Enhanced expression of hepatic IL-36γ and its prime downstream chemokine target CCL20 was detected upon liver injury. CCL20 expression coincided with the later regeneration phase of intoxication. Primary murine hepatocytes and human Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma cells indeed displayed enhanced IL-36γ expression when exposed to inflammatory cytokines. Administration of IL-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36Ra) decreased hepatic CCL20 in APAP-treated mice. Unexpectedly, IL-36Ra likewise increased late phase hepatic injury as detected by augmented serum alanine aminotransferase activity and histological necrosis which suggests disturbed tissue recovery upon IL-36 blockage. Finally, we demonstrate induction of IL-36γ in inflamed livers of endotoxemic mice. Observations presented introduce IL-36γ as novel parameter in acute liver injury which may contribute to the decision between unleashed tissue damage and initiation of liver regeneration during late APAP toxicity.

Tissue injury associated with inappropriate application of the analgesic acetaminophen (APAP, paracetamol) is a leading cause of acute liver failure and thus considered a major burden for health care systems worldwide1. From a conceptual point of view, experimental APAP-induced liver injury is a valid model for studying acute diseases initiated by parenchymal cell death, but likewise regulated by innate immunoactivation in response to release of alarmins from necrotic or necroptotic cells2,3,4. Alarmins that supposedly contribute to APAP-induced liver injury include DNA5,6 and ATP7 as well as protein factors such as high-mobility group box protein-1 (HMGB1)8,9, and histones10. With the exception of ATP activating P2X7 receptors7, aforementioned alarmins may aggravate disease by action on toll-like receptors (TLRs)2,3,11. Independent reports relate severity of APAP-induced liver injury to activation of the innate TLR system mediating detrimental inflammation. This specifically applies to TLR410,12,13, TLR314, and TLR95,9. However, the role of the innate immune system and related cytokine production in APAP-induced liver damage is more complex and definitely includes the potential to initiate protective mechanisms that associate with repair and regeneration15. Indeed, if tissue damage stays below a threshold, resolution prevails and prevents loss of organ function by initiating compensatory proliferation, repair, and regeneration. Of note, crucial protective/pro-regenerative functions of liver macrophage/dendritic cell/Kupffer cell populations are evident in the context of murine APAP intoxication16,17. This complexity is also reflected by partly disparate results obtained in different studies evaluating fine-tuning of APAP toxicity. For example, while confirming previous data on the pathogenic action of HMGB18 and TLR95, a recent report did not support a role for TLR4 in mediating APAP-induced tissue damage9.

Some members of the interleukin (IL)-1 cytokine family18, for example IL-1α and IL-1β, are supposed to be upregulated by alarmins during APAP-induced liver injury. However, the role of IL-1 in APAP toxicity is actually not uniformly assessed. Either pathogenic action5,19, no significant function20, or protection21 by IL-1 has been observed in APAP-induced liver injury. A further cytokine of the IL-1 family able to efficiently activate epithelial (-like) cells is IL-36γ22. This cytokine, formerly known as IL-1F923, shows characteristic properties shared by several IL-1 family members such as absence of a conventional signal peptide18, the necessity for proteolytic maturation to acquire full biological activity24, and usage of the IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAcP) as one component of its heterodimeric receptor18,25. The other receptor component, IL-1 receptor related protein-2 (IL-1Rrp2), specifically binds to IL-36γ and its siblings IL-36α or IL-36β and initiates, in cooperation with IL-1RAcP, signaling via nuclear factor (NF)-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinases25. Besides mononuclear phagocytes and T cells26,27, especially cells of epithelial origin are sources and targets of IL-36γ22,28,29. Accordingly, IL-36γ has been linked to the pathogenesis of psoriasis22. Biological activity of IL-36 cytokines is controlled by IL-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36Ra) which tightly binds IL-1Rrp2 but lacks the potential to recruit IL-1RAcP. Excess of IL-36Ra thus blocks IL-36 function in a manner similar to the action of IL-1Ra on IL-1 biological activity24. Furthermore, IL-38 is capable of inhibiting IL-36γ by analogous action30. The relevance of IL-36 in pathophysiology is underscored by aggravated experimental psoriasis upon IL-36Ra deficiency31,32. Even more impressive is the association between non-functional IL-36Ra and the development of clinical generalized pustular psoriasis, a most severe entity of dermal inflammation33.

Since specific information on that matter is currently lacking, we set out to investigate the significance of IL-36 cytokines in the hepatic compartment with focus on APAP-induced liver injury.

Results

Expression of IL-36γ in murine APAP-induced liver injury and inflamed hepatocytes

Since IL-36γ is a novel parameter potentially determining the biology of ‘epithelial-like' hepatocytes and thus APAP-induced liver injury, we set out to investigate its expression in this setting. As shown in Fig. 1A, upregulation of hepatic IL-36γ expression was detectable at 24 h, but not at 6 h, after application of APAP. Notably, amelioration of APAP-induced liver disease by administration of recombinant IL-2234,35 associated with modulation of hepatic IL-36γ (Fig. 1a), suggesting that expression of IL-36γ may link to disease severity. To assess the specificity of IL-36 expression in APAP-induced liver injury, hepatic IL-36α and IL-36β were likewise determined. Notably, IL-36γ was by far the most abundantly expressed IL-36 cytokine in this model of acute liver damage (Fig. 1b). We previously reported on IL-36γ expression in primary human monocyte-derived dendritic cells or M1 macrophages under the influence of IL-1β/TNFα/IFNγ26. Yet, a characteristic feature of IL-36γ biology is its expression in activated cells of epithelial origin such as keratinocytes28 and lung epithelial cells29. Therefore, expression of IL-36γ was investigated in primary murine hepatocytes and human Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Here, we demonstrate upregulation of IL-36γ by inflammatory IL-1β/TNFα/IFNγ in both cell types (Fig. 1cd). Notably, expression of IL-15,20 as well as TNFα14,34,36,37,38 and IFNγ37,38,39 has been detected in liver tissue undergoing APAP-induced injury. Data presented thus suggest hepatocytes, besides mononuclear phagocytes, as possible source of IL-36γ during inflammatory liver damage. To further investigate the relevance of IL-36γ for liver pathology, expression of IL-1Rrp2, the decisive IL-36 receptor chain, was analyzed. Liver tissue IL-1Rrp2 mRNA was significantly upregulated 6 h after treatment of mice with APAP (264 ± 45% versus control mice (ctrl, see methods section) set as 100%, means ± SEM; n = 6, p = 0.0075, Student's t-test). At the 24 h time point after APAP administration, hepatic IL-1Rrp2 mRNA levels had decreased to levels not significantly different from those of ctrl mice (data not shown). Subsequent immunohistochemical analysis revealed that augmented IL-1Rrp2 mRNA levels detectable in the early phase of intoxication associated with enhanced protein expression at the 24 h time point after APAP administration. IL-1Rrp2 protein was barely detectable in healthy murine liver. Notably, IL-1Rrp2 protein was located at the edges of centrilobular necrosis, a typical hallmark of APAP intoxication (Fig. 1e). Altogether, data indicate IL-36 responsiveness of the inflamed murine liver.

Figure 1. Expression of IL-36γ in murine APAP-induced liver injury and inflamed hepatocytes.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(ab) Mice received PBS (n = 6) or APAP or (where indicated) APAP/IL-22 (6 h (n = 6), 24 h (n = 9)). (a) Hepatic IL-36γ mRNA was determined by realtime PCR. Target mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH (means ± SEM versus ctrl; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus ctrl; #p < 0.05). (b) Hepatic IL-36αβγ mRNAs were determined by realtime PCR. Target mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH and is shown as raw data (2−ddCt × 107; means ± SEM; ***p < 0.001 versus ctrl of the same target gene; n.s., not significant). (ab) Statistical analysis, one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni correction. (c) Murine primary hepatocytes were kept as unstimulated control (ctrl) or stimulated with IL-1β/TNFα/IFNγ (each 50 ng/ml). IL-36γ mRNA expression was determined by realtime PCR. Target mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH (means ± SEM versus ctrl; n = 3). (d) Huh7 cells were kept as unstimulated ctrl or stimulated with IL-1β/TNFα/IFNγ (each 50 ng/ml). After 3 h (left panel) or 24 h (right panel), IL-36γ mRNA (left panel) or protein (right panel) was determined by realtime PCR or immunoblotting, respectively. Target mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH (means ± SD versus ctrl; n = 8). One representative immunoblot of five independently performed experiments is shown. (cd) Statistical analysis, Student's t-test versus ctrl at the respective time point. (e) Representative murine liver immunohistochemistry of IL-1Rrp2 at 24 h after APAP application (left panel: ctrl; right panel: APAP).

Expression of CCL20 in APAP-induced liver injury

The C-C chemokine CCL20, also coined liver and activation regulated chemokine, is among genes efficiently upregulated by IL-36γ in human primary keratinocytes26,28,40 and bronchial epithelial cells29. Herein, we extend those observations to human, IL-1Rrp2 expressing (data not shown), Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma cells (4.0-fold induction of CCL20 mRNA, 4 h incubation with IL-36γ at 100 ng/ml, n = 3, p = 0.0348, Student's t-test) and human monocyte-derived macrophages (463-fold induction of CCL20 mRNA, 4 h incubation with IL-36γ at 100 ng/ml, n = 5, p = 0.0012, Student's t-test), respectively.

Since CCL20 has been related to hepatic necroinflammation41, we set out to investigate this chemokine in the context of APAP-induced liver injury. Compared to IL-36γ, CCL20 expression was induced with a delayed kinetic showing up well after 24 h of exposure to APAP (Fig. 2a). Amelioration of disease by application of IL-22 was, in similarity to observations on IL-36γ, associated with significant reduction of hepatic CCL20 expression (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2. CCL20 expression in murine APAP-induced liver injury.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Mice received PBS (n = 6) or APAP (6 h, n = 6; 24 h, n = 9; 48 h, n = 11) for indicated time points. Hepatic CCL20 and IL-36γ mRNA was determined by realtime PCR. Target mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH (means ± SEM versus ctrl of target mRNA, ***p < 0.001 and ##p < 0.01 versus ctrl at the respective time point). (b) Mice received PBS (n = 6) or APAP (24 h (n = 9) or 48 h (n = 6)) or APAP/IL-22 (24 h (n = 9) or 48 h (n = 6)). Hepatic CCL20 mRNA was determined by realtime PCR. Target mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH (means ± SEM versus ctrl; ***p < 0.001 versus ctrl, ###p < 0.001). (ab) Statistical analysis, one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni correction).

Application of IL-36Ra decreases CCL20 expression but increases parameters of tissue damage in late murine APAP-induced liver injury

To assess the function of IL-36γ in liver pathology, mice were co-treated with recombinant murine IL-36Ra along with APAP administration. After 48 h, hepatic chemokine expression and liver damage as detected by histology and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity was evaluated. In accord with data demonstrating induction of CCL20 by recombinant IL-36γ in cell culture, significant reduction of hepatic CCL20 expression became evident in mice that underwent APAP toxicity upon treatment with IL-36Ra. Reduction of CCL20 by IL-36Ra was detected on mRNA (Fig. 3a) and protein level (Fig. 3b), respectively. Notably, this was not the result of a general anti-inflammatory effect of IL-36Ra, because hepatic expression of CCL2 and CXCL2, both markers of local hepatic inflammation, was either augmented or unaffected upon IL-36Ra (Fig. 3c).

Figure 3. Application of IL-36Ra modulates CCL20 expression in late murine APAP-induced liver injury.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(abc) Mice received APAP (n = 11) or APAP/IL-36Ra (n = 12) and were maintained for 48 h. Thereafter, hepatic CCL20 mRNA (a) and protein (b) was determined by realtime PCR and ELISA, respectively. (a) Target mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH and is shown as percent of APAP alone (means ± SEM). (b) Liver tissue CCL20 content was determined by ELISA, is depicted as pg/500 μg total protein, and shown as means ± SEM. (c) Hepatic CCL2 and CXCL2 mRNA was determined by realtime PCR. Target mRNA was normalized to that of GAPDH and is shown as percent of APAP alone set as 100% (means ± SEM). Statistical analysis, Student's t-test; n.s., not significant.

To determine the functional relevance of IL-36γ blockage during APAP-induced liver injury, serum ALT was analyzed. While not significantly affecting serum ALT near the peak of hepatic injury at 24 h after APAP administration [8683 ± 1123 units/liter (n = 10) versus 10221 ± 1744 (n = 9) for APAP versus APAP/IL-36Ra, respectively], IL-36Ra application significantly upregulated this parameter of liver injury in the late phase of intoxication at the 48 h time point (Fig. 4a). Accordingly, computer-based analysis of histological liver sections demonstrated a significant 2-fold increase of APAP-induced necrosis upon IL-36Ra treatment (Fig. 4b). Fig. 4c displays representative 48 h time point liver sections derived from mice undergoing either APAP (left panel) or APAP/IL-36Ra treatment (right panel). Compensatory proliferation in late APAP toxicity was assessed by immunohistochemical analysis of Ki67, an established marker of hepatocyte proliferation. As compared to mice obtaining APAP alone, administration of IL-36Ra to APAP treated-mice was associated with a significant 21.5 ± 3.8% decrease of Ki67-positive hepatocytes (n = 8 for both groups, p = 0.0155, Students t-test) indicating some reduction of compensatory proliferation under the influence of IL-36Ra.

Figure 4. Application of IL-36Ra exacerbates tissue damage in late murine APAP-induced liver injury.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Mice received either APAP (n = 16) or APAP/IL-36Ra (n = 16) and were maintained for 48 h. Thereafter, serum ALT activity was determined and is depicted as units/liter (means ± SEM). (b) Mice received either APAP (n = 8) or APAP/IL-36Ra (n = 8). Statistical analysis of necrotic areas in H&E-stained liver sections after 48 h. (ab) Statistical analysis, Student's t-test. (c) Representative liver sections (H&E staining) 48 h after the onset of APAP intoxication.

IL-36γ expression in livers of endotoxemic mice

To extend current information on hepatic IL-36γ expression to inflammatory conditions different from APAP-induced liver injury, murine endotoxemia was analyzed. As shown in table 1, endotoxemia mediated, along with upregulation of prototypic markers of inflammation such as TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6, strong induction of hepatic IL-36γ and CCL20 mRNA expression.

Table 1. Fold induction of hepatic cytokine mRNA expression after 3h of endotoxemia versus untreated ctrl animals.

IL-36γ 41.5 ± 7.0 p = 0.0002
CCL20 51.6 ± 16.6 p = 0.0123
TNFα 28.2 ± 7.9 p = 0.0065
IL-1β 30.3 ± 9.7 p = 0.0127
IL-6 67.9 ± 19.4 p = 0.0062
Open in a new tab

Data are shown as means ± SEM.

p-values compared to ctrl animals.

Discussion

Analysis of hierarchically organized cytokine networks is key to advance our understanding of diseases that associate with inflammatory processes. Here, we propose IL-36γ as novel player in late APAP-induced liver damage. Using murine endotoxemia, we confirm expression of IL-36γ by the diseased liver.

Expression of IL-36γ in murine liver was detectable at 24 h after APAP administration, proposing that this cytokine regulates a later phase of intoxication, which may coincide with tissue repair and regeneration. At that time point, IL-1Rrp2, the IL-36 receptor, was increased at the edges of centrilobular necrosis localizing IL-36γ action specifically to the site of extensive hepatic injury. Amelioration of APAP-induced toxicity by administration of IL-22 reduced hepatic IL-36γ expression. Altogether, these observations suggest that release of alarmins from necrotic liver parenchyma in the amplification/injury phase of intoxication15 mediates somewhat delayed expression of IL-36γ, possibly secondary to more proximal inflammatory cytokines. In fact, induction of IL-36γ was detected in cultured murine primary hepatocytes or human Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma cells exposed to inflammatory IL-1/TNFα/IFNγ. Beyond parenchymal cells such as hepatocytes, we recently reported on IL-36γ expression by activated mononuclear phagocytes26. It should be noted that the role of Kupffer cells and other macrophage lineages in APAP toxicity is not discussed uniformly. Whereas mononuclear phagocytes may contribute to early liver injury during initial intoxication42, those cells evidently initiate and promote the regeneration phase of intoxication15.

On a functional level, we demonstrate that application of recombinant IL-36Ra significantly aggravates late phase liver damage, as detected by histological analysis of liver necrosis and serum ALT activity. Moreover, we observed that IL-36γ determines induction of CCL20 in this advanced phase of liver injury. This conclusion is based on impaired CCL20 mRNA and protein expression after IL-36Ra administration. IL-36Ra is a genuine receptor antagonist that blocks activity of IL-36 by binding to IL-1Rrp224. However, activation of the orphan receptor SIGIRR was recently put forward as additional mode of IL-36Ra action. SIGIRR curbs signaling by TLR ligands or IL-1 cytokines thus inhibiting key inflammatory pathways, among others NF-κB- and c-jun terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent signalling43. A connection between SIGIRR and IL-36Ra was proposed in light of early data indicating that upregulation of anti-inflammatory IL-4 by IL-36Ra in the brain is abrogated in SIGIRR knockout mice44. However, biochemical evidence supporting direct binding of IL-36Ra to SIGIRR has not been presented. Several points yet argue against SIGIRR as regulatory mechanism in the context of data presented herein. First, activation of anti-inflammatory SIGIRR would likely ameliorate APAP-induced liver injury. This assumption also connects to the pathogenic role of JNK in APAP intoxication45 and the capability of IL-4 to ameliorate disease in this setting46. In fact, we actually observed significantly augmented late histological necrosis and serum ALT activity, a systemic parameter reflecting liver damage, in IL-36Ra treated mice. Accordingly, IL-36Ra administration likewise associated with enhanced hepatic expression of CCL2, a notorious surrogate of necroinflammation. Altogether, data indicate that specific downregulation of CCL20 by IL-36Ra is unlikely related to SIGIRR but mediated by blockage of IL-36γ on the level of IL-1Rrp2. In accord with the requirement of IL-36γ biological activity for efficient CCL20 induction in vivo, we observed upregulation of this chemokine by IL-36γ in cultured Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma cells and primary macrophages.

Regulation of CCL20 by IL-36γ may impact on the course of APAP-induced disease. CCL20 is a C-C chemokine targeting CCR6 as sole receptor. The complex biology of CCL20 is largely based on functional CCR6 expression on T cell subsets with partly opposing functions in pathophysiology, namely regulatory T cells (Tregs), Th17 cells47, and γδ T cells48. γδT cells have been described to aggravate APAP-induced liver injury by producing IL-178. A similar mode of pathogenic action supposedly applies to Th17 cells that likewise accumulate in the liver upon APAP intoxication49. However, the liver-homing capacity of CCL20 may also mediate tissue protection, repair, and regeneration. Notably, a recent report demonstrates that the aforementioned CCL20-γδT cell-IL-17-IL-22-axis likewise promotes liver regeneration after experimental murine hepatectomy50. These observations suggest that, in addition to differences in disease models, timing of γδT cells action may be pivotal for their function on the course of liver injury. Although the function of Tregs has, to the best of our knowledge, not been reported so far for APAP intoxication, their protective potential in acute liver injury is evident51. In fact, IL-10, a major Treg product, is protective in APAP-induced liver damage52. CCL20 may also directly stimulate hepatic stellate cells (HSC), for example by activating pro-proliferative mitogen-activated protein kinases53. Notably, depletion of HSC worsens experimental APAP intoxication54. The relevance of CCL20 acting on HSC for repair in APAP-induced liver injury has not been investigated. However, as HSC are crucial for liver regeneration55, their activation by CCL20 might be of significance.

Finally, aggravation of APAP-induced liver damage by IL-36Ra is reminiscent of data on amelioration of toxicity detected in IL-1Ra deficient mice21. In fact, it has been shown that IL-1 produced by necrotic liver tissue is able to support regeneration by compensatory hepatocyte proliferation via activation of the IL-6/STAT3 axis56. IL-6, along with IL-22, is key to STAT3 activation in diseased liver tissue57. Notably, IL-36γ has been shown to efficiently induce IL-6 in mononuclear phagocytes27,40 and endogenous IL-6 displays protective/pro-regenerative action in APAP-induced liver injury58,59. Herein, application of IL-36Ra reduced hepatocyte Ki67 expression in the late regeneration phase of APAP-induced liver injury by 21%. Albeit this effect appears modest, it indicates that impaired compensatory proliferation may contribute to aggravation of toxicity upon IL-36 blockage. Observations suggest that, when biologically active, IL-36γ likely contributes to a mediator milieu favoring tissue repair/regeneration in the later phase of APAP intoxication.

Altogether, the unexpected observation that blockage of IL-36γ by IL-36Ra exacerbates APAP-induced liver injury may reflect the counterintuitive but inherent potential of some inflammatory cytokines to initiate regeneration when adequately expressed at the right time and place.

Methods

Reagents

APAP and lipopolysaccharide (LPS; O55:B5) were from Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany. Murine IL-22 was from Immunotools, Friesoythe, Germany. Mature human IL-36γ (aa18-aa169) and murine IL-36Ra were from R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany. IL-1β (human), TNFα (human, mouse), IFNγ (human, mouse), and human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) were from Peprotech Inc., Frankfurt, Germany.

Murine APAP-induced liver damage and experimental endotoxemia

Experiments using male C57Bl/6N mice (Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany; 8–10 weeks old) were approved by the Regierungspräsidium Darmstadt and were in accordance with NIH guidelines. Before being sacrificed, mice underwent short isoflurane (Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany) anesthesia. Blood was drawn from the retro orbital venous plexus. Serum ALT activity was quantified according to manufacturer's instructions (Reflotron, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). For RNA analysis, liver tissue was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. For histological analysis, liver tissue was perfused with PBS via the portal vein followed by overnight incubation in 4.5% buffered formalin. Paraffin-embedded liver sections (4 μm) were stained with H&E. Histopathologic liver injury was quantified in blinded manner by ImageJ 1.46r (NIH, Bethesda, MD) software. Murine APAP-induced liver damage was induced as previously described34. Briefly, fasted male mice obtained (as indicated) i.v. injections of PBS or IL-22 (3.5 μg/mouse) or IL-36Ra (6 μg/mouse). Immediately thereafter, i.p. injection of either warm NaCl (0.9%, B.Braun, Melsungen, Germany) or APAP (500 mg/kg dissolved in warm 0.9% NaCl) was performed. Mice that obtained PBS followed by NaCl are depicted as control mice (ctrl) throughout the manuscript. Mice had free access to food and water thereafter. After indicated time points, mice were sacrificed. We experienced a relatively low 48 h-mortality rate in this model of murine APAP (500 mg/kg)-induced liver injury (2/24 for APAP and 1/17 for APAP/IL-36Ra, respectively) which, however, agrees with a recent report using a very similar experimental protocol17. Notably, at the higher 750 mg/kg APAP dosage we observed an approximately 50% mortality rate within a 24 h observation period (4/9)34.

For induction of endotoxemia, unfasted male mice were injected intraperitoneally with either PBS or LPS (5 mg/kg dissolved in PBS). After three hours, mice were sacrificed and hepatic cytokine expression was analyzed.

Immunohistochemical detection of IL-1Rrp2 and Ki67 in liver tissue

For detection of hepatic IL-1Rrp2- and Ki67 positive cells, paraffin-embedded liver sections (4 μm) were used. Sections were deparaffinized and unmasked by heat treatment (Dako Target Retrieval Solution, Glostrup, Denmark). Thereafter, sections were incubated with goat anti-murine IL-1Rrp2 antibody (R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany) or rabbit anti-murine Ki67 antibody (Epitomics, Burlingame, CA) overnight at 4°C. For detection, rabbit anti-goat universal immuno-peroxidase polymer (IL-1Rrp2) or goat anti-rabbit universal immune-peroxidase polymer (Ki-67; both Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan) and DAB Substrate Kit for Peroxidase (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) were used. Sections were counterstained using hematoxylin.

Isolation of murine hepatocytes

For isolation of murine hepatocytes C57Bl/6N mice were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg, i.p.) and xylazine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). After disinfection and laparotomy, a 22 G cannula was placed in the inferior vena cava. After dissection of the portal vein, retrograde liver perfusion was performed with 37°C warm HBSS without Ca2+ and Mg2+ (supplemented with 15 mM HEPES, 2.5 mM EGTA, 1 g/l glucose, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin) using a roller pump (10 ml/min) for 10 min. Next, the liver was perfused with HBSS with Ca2+ und Mg2+ (supplemented with 15 mM HEPES, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.13 mg/ml collagenase IV (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin) for additional 10 min. The liver was carefully removed from the abdominal cavity, placed in a Petri dish on ice and opened with a forceps. Liver cells were resuspended in Williams Medium E (supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-Alanyl-L-Glutamin (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin) and put over a 100 μm cell strainer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After two rounds of centrifugation (5 min at 50 g and 4°C) and resuspension, cell viability was determined by trypan blue dye exclusion, and cells were seeded in serum-free medium on collagen G-coated plates (Biochrom). Adherent hepatocytes were washed after 2 h with PBS and fresh Williams Medium E (supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-Alanyl-L-Glutamin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin) was added. Stimulation with recombinant cytokines was performed 16 h thereafter.

Generation of human monocyte-derived macrophages

For isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), written informed consent was obtained from healthy donors, and blood was taken. All experimental protocols were approved by the ‘Ethik Kommission' of the University Hospital Goethe-University Frankfurt. The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Healthy donors had abstained from taking drugs/medication for 2 weeks before the study. PBMC were isolated from peripheral blood using Histopaque-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The CD14+ cell population of PBMC was isolated by using CD14 antibody-conjugated magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). After isolation, CD14+ cell purity was determined by FACS analysis (FACS Canto, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) using a mouse monoclonal anti-human CD14-phycoerythrin antibody (eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany). Enrichment of CD14+ cells was >94.9%. Cells were resuspended in IMDM (supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated human serum (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 1× nonessential amino acids, and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol) and seeded at a density of 8× 105 cells/0.75 ml on 12-well polystyrene plates (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany). For generation of monocyte-derived macrophages, CD14+ cells were cultured in the presence of M-CSF (100 ng/ml) for 7 days. 75% of spent medium was exchanged for fresh medium and fresh cytokines on days 3 and 5. On day 7 macrophages were stimulated in the aforementioned medium as indicated.

Cultivation of Huh7 cells

The human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Huh7 (kindly provided by Dr. Kai Breuhahn, Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Germany) was maintained in DMEM (with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 10% FCS)60. For experiments, cells were seeded on 6-well polystyrene plates in the aforementioned culture medium. All incubations were performed at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Detection of IL-36γ by immunoblot analysis

Cell lysates were obtained as previously described26. Briefly, for detection of proteins, cells were lysed in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100), supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and DTT, Na3VO4, PMSF (each 1 mM), and NaF (20 mM). Antibodies: IL-36γ, goat polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems); β-Tubulin, mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Analysis of cytokine expression by realtime PCR

After RNA isolation (Tri-Reagent, Sigma-Aldrich), 1 μg of total RNA was transcribed using hexameric primers and Moloney virus RT (Life Technologies). Realtime PCR was performed on AbiPrism 7500 Fast Sequence Detector (Life Technologies): one initial step at 95°C for 5 min was followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 2 sec and 60°C for 25 sec. Detection of the dequenched probe, calculation of threshold cycles (Ct values), and data analysis were performed by the Sequence Detector software. The following probes (Applied Biosystems) were used (all FAM): mIL-36α, Mm00457645_m1; mIL-36β, Mm01337546_g1; mIL-36γ, Mm00463327_m1; mIL-1Rrp2, Mm00519245_m1; mCCL20, Mm01268754_m1; mCCL2, Mm00441242_m1; mCXCL2, Mm00436450_m1; mTNFα, Mm00443285_m1; mIL-1β, Mm00434228_m1; mIL-6, Mm00446190_m1; hCCL20, Hs01011368_m1; hIL-36γ, Hs00219742_m1. mRNA expression was normalized to GAPDH (mouse: 4352339E; human: 4310884E; both VIC) and relative changes in the respective mRNA were quantified by the 2−ddCt method.

Analysis of cytokine release by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Murine CCL20 (hepatic protein lysate) was determined by ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions (R&D Systems). For detection of CCL20 in hepatic tissue, liver specimens were homogenized in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100), supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and DTT, Na3VO4, PMSF (each 1 mM), and NaF (20 mM). To control for background effects, ELISA standard curve and blank were prepared in corresponding dilutions of lysis buffer.

Statistical analysis

Data were first evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for parametric distribution. For two groups, raw data were analyzed by an unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. For comparison of three or more groups, raw data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni correction. Data are shown as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM, animal data or cell culture using primary cells) or as means ± standard deviation (SD, cell culture data using cell lines) and are presented as fold induction, pg/500 μg total protein, % (APAP vs. APAP/IL-36Ra; necrotic area vs. total liver section), units/liter, or as raw data (2−ddCt × 107). Differences were considered statistically significant if the p value was <0.05 (GraphPad Prism, La Jolla, CA, USA). For analysis by unpaired Student's t-test specific p values are indicated whereas in case of analysis by one-way analysis of variance upper limits of p values are depicted.

Author Contributions

P.S., M.B., L.H. and T.P. performed experiments. P.S., M.B., A.P., B.Z., J.P. and H.M. analyzed the data and contributed in manuscript editing and relevant citations. P.S. and M.B. prepared the figures. P.S. and H.M. designed the study. H.M. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Merck'sche Gesellschaft für Kunst und Wissenschaft e.V. Expert technical advice by Dr. Itamar Goren is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Bernau W., Auzinger G., Dhawan A. & Wendon J. Acute liver failure. Lancet 376, 190–201 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kubes P. & Mehal W. Z. Sterile inflammation in the liver. Gastroenterology 143, 1158–1172 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Maher J. J. DAMPs ramp up drug toxicity. J. Clint. Invest. 119, 246–249 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner C., Galluzzi L., Kepp O. & Kroemer G. Decoding cell death signals in liver inflammation. J. Hepatol. 59, 583–594 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Imaeda A. B. et al. Acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice is dependent on Tlr9 and the Nalp3 inflammasome. J. Clint. Invest. 119, 305–314 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marques P. E. et al. Hepatic DNA deposition drives drug-induced liver injury and inflammation in mice. Hepatology 61, 348–360 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoque R. et al. 2012. P2X7 receptor-mediated purinergic signaling promotes liver injury in acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 302, G1171–1179 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang X., Sun R., Wei H. & Tian Z. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)-Toll-like receptor (TLR)4-interleukin (IL)-23-IL-17A axis in drug-induced damage-associated lethal hepatitis: Interaction of γδ T cells with macrophages. Hepatology 57, 373–384 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai C. et al. Benzyl alcohol attenuates acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury in a toll-like receptor-4 dependent pattern in mice. Hepatology 60, 990–1002 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Xu J., Zhang X., Monestier M., Esmon N. L. & Esmon C. T. Extracellular histones are mediators of death through TLR2 and TLR4 in mouse fatal liver injury. J. Immunol. 187, 2626–2631 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gallucci S. & Matzinger P. Danger signals: SOS to the immune system. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 13, 114–119 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yohe H. C. et al. Involvement of Toll-like receptor 4 in acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 290, G1269–1279 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shah N. et al. Role of toll-like receptor 4 in mediating multiorgan dysfunction in mice with acetaminophen induced acute liver failure. Liver Transpl. 19, 751–761 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cavassani K. A. et al. Toll like receptor 3 plays a critical role in the progression and severity of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. PLoS One 8, e65899 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaeschke H., Williams C. D., Ramachandran A. & Bajt M. L. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity and repair: the role of sterile inflammation and innate immunity. Liver Int. 32, 8–20 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ju C. et al. Protective role of Kupffer cells in acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury in mice. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 15, 1504–1513 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Connolly M. K. et al. Dendritic cell depletion exacerbates acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Hepatology 54, 959–968 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dinarello C. A. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood 117, 3720–3732 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen C. J. et al. Identification of a key pathway required for the sterile inflammatory response triggered by dying cells. Nat. Med. 13, 851–856 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams C. D., Farhood A. & Jaeschke H. Role of caspase-1 and interleukin-1beta in acetaminophen-induced hepatic inflammation and liver injury. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 247, 169–178 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ishibe T. et al. Reduced acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice by genetic disruption of IL-1 receptor antagonist. Lab. Invest. 89, 68–79 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Towne J. E. & Sims J. E. IL-36 in psoriasis. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 12, 486–490 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dinarello C. et al. IL-1 family nomenclature. Nat. Immunol. 11, 973 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Towne J. E. et al. Interleukin-36 (IL-36) ligands require processing for full agonist (IL-36α, IL-36β, and IL-36γ) or antagonist (IL-36Ra) activity. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 42594–42602 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Towne J. E., Garka K. E., Renshaw B. R., Virca G. D. & Sims J. E. Interleukin (IL)-1F6, IL-1F8, and IL-1F9 signal through IL-1Rrp2 and IL-1RAcP to activate the pathway leading to NF-kappaB and MAPKs. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 13677–13688 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bachmann M., Scheiermann P., Härdle L., Pfeilschifter J. & Mühl H. IL-36γ/IL-1F9, an innate T-bet target in myeloid cells. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 41684–41696 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vigne S. et al. IL-36R ligands are potent regulators of dendritic and T cells. Blood 118, 5813–5823 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnston A. et al. IL-1F5, -F6, -F8, and -F9: a novel IL-1 family signaling system that is active in psoriasis and promotes keratinocyte antimicrobial peptide expression. J. Immunol. 186, 2613–2622 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chustz R. T. et al. Regulation and function of the IL-1 family cytokine IL-1F9 in human bronchial epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 45, 145–153 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. van de Veerdonk F. L. et al. IL-38 binds to the IL-36 receptor and has biological effects on immune cells similar to IL-36 receptor antagonist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 3001–3005 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Blumberg H. et al. Opposing activities of two novel members of the IL-1 ligand family regulate skin inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 204, 2603–2614 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tortola L. et al. Psoriasiform dermatitis is driven by IL-36-mediated DC-keratinocyte crosstalk. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 3965–3976 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marrakchi S. et al. Interleukin-36-receptor antagonist deficiency and generalized pustular psoriasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 620–628 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Scheiermann P. et al. Application of interleukin-22 mediates protection in experimental acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury. Am. J. Pathol. 182, 1107–1113 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Feng D. et al. Acute and Chronic Effects of IL-22 on Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Injury. J. Immunol. 193, 2512–2518 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dragomir A. C., Sun R., Choi H., Laskin J. D. & Laskin D. L. Role of galectin-3 in classical and alternative macrophage activation in the liver following acetaminophen intoxication. J. Immunol. 189, 5934–5941 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Henderson N. C. et al. Critical role of c-jun (NH2) terminal kinase in paracetamol- induced acute liver failure. Gut 56, 982–990 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu Z. X., Govindarajan S. & Kaplowitz N. Innate immune system plays a critical role in determining the progression and severity of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Gastroenterology 127, 1760–1774 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ishida Y. et al. A pivotal involvement of IFN-gamma in the pathogenesis of acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury. FASEB J. 16, 1227–1236 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Foster A. M. et al. IL-36 promotes myeloid cell infiltration, activation, and inflammatory activity in skin. J. Immunol. 192, 6053–6061 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shimizu Y. et al. CC-chemokine receptor 6 and its ligand macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha might be involved in the amplification of local necroinflammatory response in the liver. Hepatology 34, 311–319 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Michael S. L., Pumford N. R., Mayeux P. R., Niesman M. R. & Hinson J. A. Pretreatment of mice with macrophage inactivators decreases acetaminophen hepatotoxicity and the formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Hepatology 30, 186–195 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Garlanda C., Riva F., Bonavita E., Gentile S. & Mantovani A. Decoys and Regulatory "Receptors" of the IL-1/Toll-Like Receptor Superfamily. Front. Immunol. 4, 180 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Costelloe C. et al. IL-1F5 mediates anti-inflammatory activity in the brain through induction of IL-4 following interaction with SIGIRR/TIR8. J. Neurochem. 105, 1960–1969 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gunawan B. K. et al. c-Jun N-terminal kinase plays a major role in murine acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Gastroenterology 131, 165–178 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ryan P. M. et al. Endogenous interleukin-4 regulates glutathione synthesis following acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 25, 83–93 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lee A. Y., Eri R., Lyons A. B., Grimm M. C. & Korner H. CC Chemokine Ligand 20 and its cognate receptor CCR6 in mucosal T cell immunology and inflammatory bowel disease: odd couple or axis of evil? Front. Immunol. 4, 194 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hammerich L. et al. Chemokine receptor CCR6-dependent accumulation of γδ T cells in injured liver restricts hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Hepatology 59, 630–642 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhu X. & Uetrecht J. A novel T(H)17-type cell is rapidly increased in the liver in response to acetaminophen-induced liver injury: T(H)17 cells and the innate immune response. J. Immunotoxicol. 10, 287–291 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rao R. et al. Interleukin 17-Producing γδT Cells Promote Hepatic Regeneration in Mice. Gastroenterology 147, 473–484 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Erhardt A., Biburger M., Papadopoulos T. & Tiegs G. IL-10, regulatory T cells, and Kupffer cells mediate tolerance in concanavalin A-induced liver injury in mice. Hepatology 45, 475–485 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Bourdi M. et al. Protection against acetaminophen-induced liver injury and lethality by interleukin 10: role of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Hepatology 35, 289–298 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Affò S. et al. CCL20 mediates lipopolysaccharide induced liver injury and is a potential driver of inflammation and fibrosis in alcoholic hepatitis. Gut 63, 1782–1792 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Shen K. et al. Depletion of activated hepatic stellate cell correlates with severe liver damage and abnormal liver regeneration in acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Acta. Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 43, 307–315 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yin C., Evaso K. J., Asahina K. & Stainier D. Y. Hepatic stellate cells in liver development, regeneration, and cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 1902–1910 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sakurai T. et al. Hepatocyte necrosis induced by oxidative stress and IL-1 alpha release mediate carcinogen-induced compensatory proliferation and liver tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 14, 156–165 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gao B., Wang H., Lafdil F. & Feng D. STAT proteins - key regulators of anti-viral responses, inflammation, and tumorigenesis in the liver. J. Hepatol. 57, 430–441 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. James L. P., Lamps L. W., McCullough S. & Hinson J. A. Interleukin 6 and hepatocyte regeneration in acetaminophen toxicity in the mouse. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 309, 857–863 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Masubuchi Y. et al. Role of interleukin-6 in hepatic heat shock protein expression and protection against acetaminophen-induced liver disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 304, 207–212 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Haupenthal J. et al. Reduced efficacy of the Plk1 inhibitor BI 2536 on the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma due to low intratumoral drug levels. Neoplasia 14, 410–419 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES