Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Feb 9;35(6):906–913. doi: 10.1007/s00246-014-0874-x

Perinatal Outcome in Fetuses with Heterotaxy Syndrome and Atrioventricular Block or Bradycardia

Maria C Escobar-Diaz 1,2,, Wayne Tworetzky 3,4, Kevin Friedman 5,6, Terra Lafranchi 7,8, Francis Fynn-Thompson 9,10, Mark E Alexander 11,12, Douglas Y Mah 13,14
PMCID: PMC4331180  NIHMSID: NIHMS653390  PMID: 24509635

Abstract

Congenital atrioventricular (AV) block is commonly associated with heterotaxy syndrome; together they have reportedly low survival rates (10–25 %). However, information about perinatal outcome and predictors of nonsurvival after prenatal diagnosis of this association is scarce. Therefore, we studied fetuses with heterotaxy syndrome and bradycardia or AV-block diagnosed between 1995 and 2011, and analyzed pre and post-natal variables. The primary outcome was death and the secondary outcome was pacemaker placement. Of the 154 fetuses with heterotaxy syndrome, 91 had polysplenia syndrome, 22/91(24 %) with bradycardia or AV-block. Thirteen (59 %) patients had sinus bradycardia at diagnosis, 8 (36 %) complete AV block, and 1 (5 %) second-degree AV-block. Three patients elected for termination of pregnancy (3/22, 14 %), 4 had spontaneous fetal demise (4/22, 18 %), and 15 (15/22, 68 %) were live-born. Of the fetuses with bradycardia/AV-block, 30 % presented with hydrops, 20 % had ventricular rates <55 beats/min, and 10 % had cardiac dysfunction. Excluding termination of pregnancy, 15/19 fetuses (79 %) survived to birth. Among the 15 live-born patients, 4 had bradycardia and 11 had AV-block. A further 3 patients died in infancy, all with AV-block who required pacemakers in the neonatal period. Thus, the 1-year survival rate, excluding termination of pregnancy, was 63 % (12/19). Of the remaining 12 patients, 9 required pacemaker. Predictors of perinatal death included hydrops (p < 0.0001), ventricular dysfunction (p = 0.002), prematurity (p = 0.04), and low ventricular rates (p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found a higher survival rate (63 %) than previously published in patients with heterotaxy syndrome and AV block or bradycardia diagnosed prenatally. Hydrops, cardiac dysfunction, prematurity and low ventricular rates were predictors of death.

Keywords: Prenatal diagnosis, Heterotaxy syndrome, Atrioventricular block, Bradycardia

Introduction

Heterotaxy syndrome is an uncommon disease making up 0.4–2 % of structural heart disease and 1–2/10,000 live births [11, 17, 18]. Patients with polysplenia syndrome subtype (also known as isomerism of the left atrial appendages) [14] may also develop complete atrioventricular (AV) block with those diagnosed in utero reported to have a poor prognosis [16, 20, 26]. Despite early diagnosis and aggressive combined medical and surgical management, the overall mortality for these patients has been reported as high as 75–90 % [5, 20, 28].

Given the rarity of this disease, the literature on these patients is limited. Current data consist of isolated case reports and small patient series with mortality rates often confounded by the high rate of elective termination of pregnancy [1, 2, 9, 16, 21]. Data on fetuses with heterotaxy syndrome and sinus bradycardia are even more scarce [3, 19, 25]. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the mortality rate of patients with heterotaxy syndrome and bradycardia or complete AV block after prenatal diagnosis and to determine the risk factors associated with death.

Methods

This was a descriptive study designed primarily to determine the mortality rate of heterotaxy patients with bradycardia or AV block. Fetuses with heterotaxy syndrome and bradycardia and/or AV block were identified in the echocardiography database of Boston Children’s Hospital from January 1995 to December 2011. Heterotaxy syndrome was diagnosed using the anatomical characteristics defined by Van Praagh et al. [29] and was classified as asplenia (isomerism of the right atrial appendages) or polysplenia phenotype based on previously defined patterns. Bradycardia was defined as heart rate of ≤100 beats/min (bpm) present for >50 % of any fetal ultrasound. Fetal complete AV block was diagnosed when the atrial rate was greater than the ventricular rate with complete dissociation between the two. Fetuses with bradycardia were included in this study because, in our experience, patients with bradycardia have also been at risk for developing ventricular dysfunction and hydrops.

To evaluate a change in trend of prenatal and postnatal mortality over time, we performed a stratified analysis dividing our cohort in two periods depending on the year of diagnosis. One period was from 1995 to 2002, and the second period was from 2003 to 2010.

Fetal Variables

Variables assessed during pregnancy included gestational age at time of cardiac anatomic diagnosis and at bradyarrhythmia, atrial and ventricular rate at time of diagnosis, and presence or absence of hydrops at any time during pregnancy. For patients with AV block, the degree of heart block and ventricular rates were recorded as was the heart rate trend during the course of the pregnancy. Ventricular function was assessed qualitatively and defined as normal or abnormal. Ventricular dysfunction was defined as mild, moderate, or severe by the echocardiogram reader. For the purposes of the analysis, ventricular dysfunction was taken into account if at least mild qualitative dysfunction was present. Presence of AV valve regurgitation at each fetal echocardiogram was also recorded.

Postnatal Variables

Postnatal factors evaluated for those surviving to delivery included gestational age (prematurity defined as delivery before completion of 37 weeks), birth weight, need for inotropic support, and insertion of a pacemaker. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of ventricular function by echocardiography was recorded at birth and before and after pacemaker placement.

The primary outcome for this study was death before 1 year of life including termination of pregnancy, fetal death, or postnatal death. The secondary outcome was pacemaker placement after birth. Review of the medical records was approved by the Boston Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Statistics

Patient characteristics and outcomes were summarized as number (%) for categorical variables and median (interquartile range) for continuous variables without normal distribution. Comparisons between survivors and nonsurvivors were performed using Fisher exact test (for categorical variables) and Wilcoxon rank-sum test (for continuous variables). Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient Characteristics

Of the 154 fetuses with heterotaxy syndrome, 91 had polysplenia phenotype with 22 of 91 (24 %) having bradycardia or AV block. Mean maternal age at diagnosis was 30 ± 5 years with a median gestational age of 23 weeks (range 19–27). The patient’s fetal bradyarrhythmia was diagnosed concurrently with heterotaxy in 17 (77 %) patients with the remaining 5 cases diagnosed at a median of 4 weeks later (range 3.5–14). The most frequent structural heart disease found at echocardiography was AV canal defect (n = 17, 77 %), followed by double-outlet right ventricle (n = 2), single ventricle with l-loop transposition of the great arteries (n = 1), both atrial and ventricular septal defect (n = 1), and ventricular septal defect (n = 1) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Prenatal findings and postnatal outcome in fetuses with congenital AV block/bradycardia and heterotaxy syndrome

Case Year at
diagnosis
GA at
diagnosis
Cardiac
defect
First
A/V rate,
bpm
Last A/V
rate,
bpm
Cardiac
dysfunction
in utero
Hydrops Rhythm
in utero
GA at end
of
pregnancy
Birth
weight
VR
at
birth
Rhythm at
birth
Postnatal
Treatment
First
pacemaker
Outcome
1 1995 23 CAVC, PS,
AS
110/55 110/70 0 + CAVB 31 1800 50 CAVB Isoproterenol,
dopamine,
epinephrine
Temporary
transvenous
Neonatal
death
2 1995 19 CAVC, PS 120/60 120/60 0 0 CAVB 19 TOP
3 1996 31 Partial AVC 120/60 120/60 0 0 CAVB 37 2990 70 CAVB Isoproterenol,
dopamine,
epinephrine
Epicardic
single
chamber
Alive
4 1997 20 CAVC,
LVOT
obstruction
105/55 88/47 0 0 CAVB 40 3200 40 CAVB no Temporary
epicardic
Alive
5 1999 18 DORV, PS 140/50 120/40 + + CAVB 20 Fetal
death
6 2001 20 CAVC 100/100 0 0 sinus
brady
21 TOP
7 2002 19 CAVC 120/60 0 0 CAVB 20 TOP
8 2003 25 CAVC,
LVOT
obstruction
90/90 80/80 0 0 sinus
brady
38 2900 40 CAVB Isoproterenol,
dopamine
Epicardic
dual
chamber
Alive
9 2003 20 CAVC, PA 120/55 120/40 + + CAVB 26 Fetal
death
10 2004 19 CAVC 90/90 90/90 0 0 sinus
brady
40 3800 60 sinus, 2nd
AVB at 3
months
no Epicardic
dual
chamber
Alive
11 2005 30 VSD, ASD 60/60 60/60 0 0 sinus
brady
39 3400 60 CAVB no Epicardic
dual
chamber
Alive
12 2005 26 CAVC 70/70 70/70 0 + sinus
brady
26 Fetal
death
13 2006 34 SV, PS,
l-TGA
133/67 133/67 0 0 CAVB 38 3700 30 CAVB Dopamine Epicardic
dual
chamber
Alive
14 2006 26 Partial AVC,
partial
APVC
97/97 95/95 0 0 sinus
brady
38 3300 132 sinus no no Alive
15 2007 23 CAVC, PS,
DORV
85/85 55/55 0 + sinus
brady
34 3100 50 CAVB Dopamine Epicardic
dual
chamber
Died at 4
months
16 2007 38 VSD, partial
APVC
100/100 100/100 0 0 sinus
brady
38 4000 105 CAVB, good
junctional
rhythm
no no Alive
17 2008 33 DORV 100/100 100/100 0 0 sinus
brady
37 3870 100 sinus no no Alive
18 2008 23 CAVC, TOF 100/100 100/100 0 0 sinus
brady
35 2100 70 CAVB Dopamine Epicardic
dual
chamber
Alive
19 2008 16 CAVC 95/95 75/75 0 0 sinus
brady
36 2315 60 sinus node
dysfunction
Isoproterenol Temporary
epicardic
Alive
20 2008 18 CAVC,
DORV
60/60 60/60 0 + sinus
brady
26 Fetal
death
21 2009 23 CAVC 105/60 100/60 0 + CAVB 30 2000 30 CAVB Dopamine Temporary
epicardic
Neonatal
death
22 2009 26 CAVC 90/90 80/80 0 0 sinus
brady
36 2600 60 CAVB no Epicardic
dual
chamber
Alive

APVC anomalous pulmonary vein connections, AS aortic stenosis, ASD atrial septal defect, A/V atrial/ventricular, AVC atrioventricular canal, brady bradycardia, CAVB complete atrioventricular block, CAVC complete atrioventricular canal, DORV double-outlet right ventricle, GA gestational age, l-TGA l-transposition of the great arteries, LVOT left-ventricular outflow tract, PA pulmonary atresia, PS pulmonary stenosis, SV single ventricle, TOF tetralogy of fallot, TOP termination of pregnancy, VR ventricular rate, VSD ventricular septal defect, + present, 0 absent, − not performed

Bradycardia and AV Block

Thirteen patients (59 %) had sinus bradycardia at diagnosis, and 8 patients (36 %) had complete AV block. One patient had second-degree AV block that progressed to complete AV block in 4 weeks (case no. 1). Median ventricular rate at diagnosis among those with sinus bradycardia was 90 bpm (range 77–100), which decreased to 80 bpm (range 62–98) before the end of the pregnancy. Of note, once a patient was found to be bradycardic, all subsequent ultrasounds showed continued bradycardia at or lower than the first recorded heart rate with no improvement in heart rate trend noted. Median ventricular rate among those with AV block was 60 bpm (range 55–60) at both diagnosis and before the end of the pregnancy with median atrial rates of 120 bpm (range 107–126) at both first and last fetal echocadiogram. Four (20 %) fetuses (3 with AV block and 1 with bradycardia) had ventricular rates <55 bpm at the last fetal echocardiogram.

Cardiac Function

Of the 22 patients with bradycardia or AV block, 20 (91 %) had normal cardiac function at diagnosis. These patients maintained normal cardiac function throughout the pregnancy. Mild cardiac dysfunction was present at diagnosis in the 2 remaining patients (cases no. 5 and 9), both of whom had AV block with ventricular rates <55 bpm. These patients subsequently developed hydrops 2 and 6 weeks later, respectively, and died in utero at 20 and 26 weeks of gestational age soon after the diagnosis of hydrops was made. Five patients with normal cardiac function throughout pregnancy developed hydrops (3 with bradycardia and 2 with AV block) with median ventricular rate of 60 bpm (range 57–70). Of these 5 patients with normal function and hydrops, 2 had severe AV valve regurgitation, and both died at 26 weeks of gestation. The other 3 patients were delivered prematurely at 30, 31, and 34 weeks of gestation. Of the 7 patients with hydrops, the median ventricular rate was 60 bpm (range 40–70).

Pregnancy Outcome

Fifteen patients (68 %) were live born, 4 (18 %) had fetal demise and 3 (14 %) families elected for termination of pregnancy. Excluding termination of pregnancy, survival to live birth for patients with heterotaxy syndrome and either bradycardia or AV block was 79 % (15 of 19). Survival to live birth for patients with AV block was 71 % (5 of 7) and for patients with bradycardia was 83 % (10 of 12). Of the 4 fetal deaths, 2 had sinus bradycardia with ventricular rates of 60 and 70 bpm and 2 had AV block; both had ventricular rates <55 bpm. The 3 mothers who underwent termination of pregnancy had fetuses with complete AV canal with normal cardiac function. Two had complete AV block, and 1 had sinus bradycardia. Of note, no treatment was given for fetal bradycardia or heart block with no beta-agonists used.

Postnatal Outcome

Among the 15 live-born patients, median gestational age at delivery was 37 weeks (range 35–38), and median birth weight was 3,100 g (range 2,315–3,700). Six of the patients who had sinus bradycardia in utero went on to develop complete AV block postnatally. Therefore, at birth, 4 patients had sinus bradycardia and 11 had AV block confirmed on electrocardiogram postnatally. Ventricular function was normal in all but 3 patients, all of whom had at least moderate dysfunction. Six infants were born prematurely. Two were born at 31 and 30 weeks of gestation and died at 1 and 3 days of life, respectively. Both had complete AV block with ventricular escape rates of approximately 40 bpm and severely decreased ventricular function. Both had temporary pacemakers placed during the first 6 h of life. The third premature infant was born at 34 weeks of gestation with complete AV block and ventricular escape rate of 50 bpm. This patient had a pacemaker placed at 6 days of life but died at 4 months of age from sepsis and multiorgan failure (case no. 15). The other 3 premature infants were born at 35 and 36 weeks of gestation and remained stable after pacemaker placement during the neonatal period.

With a median follow-up of 4 years (range 2–8), only 1 death occurred after the neonatal period at 4 months of age (case no. 15). There were no deaths after 1 year of life. Patients alive at the end of the study (n = 12) had good ventricular function on their last follow-up echocardiogram. The overall survival rate, starting with fetal diagnosis, among those continued pregnancies was 63 % (12 of 19). Excluding those with sinus bradycardia, patients who had complete AV block (either prenatally or had sinus bradycardia that progressed to AV block postnatally) had a survival rate of 73 % (8 of 11).

Treatment

Of the 15 live-born patients, 8 required inotropic treatment to maintain hemodynamic stability before pacemaker implantation. Of the 12 surviving patients, 9 required pacemaker placement: 8 for complete AV block [median ventricular rate of 60 bpm (range 30–70)] and 1 for sinus node dysfunction (ventricular rate of 60 bpm). All but 1 patient with AV block had pacemakers placed in the neonatal period at a median age of 5 days (range 1–8). The other patient (case no. 10), who progressed from sinus bradycardia at birth to AV block, had a pacemaker placed at 3 months of age.

Predictors of Fetal Death

Excluding termination of pregnancy, the only risk factors for fetal death were cardiac dysfunction (p = 0.035) and hydrops (p = 0.009). Complete AV block and ventricular rate <55 bpm were not predictors of fetal death (Table 2). All patients with cardiac dysfunction died in utero. There was no statistical difference in fetal death between the first and second half of the study (25 vs. 20 %, p = 0.8).

Table 2.

Risk factors for fetal death (n = 19)

Risk factors Surviving
patients
(n = 15)
Non
surviving
patients
(n = 4)
p
First ventricular rate <55 bpm (in utero) 2 1 0.530
Last ventricular rate <55 bpm (in utero) 2 2 0.178
Hydrops 3 4 0.009
Cardiac dysfunction in utero 0 2 0.035
AV block in utero 5 2 0.603

Data in bold represents statistically significant data (p < 0.05)

AV atrioventricular

Predictors of Postnatal Death

When evaluating perinatal risk factors for postnatal death, hydrops (p = 0.002), prematurity (p = 0.044), low ventricular rates (p = 0.044), and cardiac dysfunction after birth (p = 0.002) were determined to be strong risk factors for nonsurvival. In contrast, patients who had low ventricular rates and cardiac dysfunction in utero, as well as those with complete AV block (in utero and/or after birth), were not at risk for postnatal death (Table 3).

Table 3.

Risk factors for postnatal death (n = 15)

Risk factors Surviving
patients
(n = 12)
Non surviving
patients
(n = 3)
p
First ventricular rate <55 bpm (in utero) 1 1 0.371
Last ventricular rate <55 bpm (in utero) 1 1 0.371
Hydrops 0 3 0.002
Cardiac dysfunction in utero 0 0 NA
AV block in utero 3 2 0.242
Prematurity 3 3 0.044
Ventricular rate at birth <55 bpm 3 3 0.044
Cardiac dysfunction after birth 0 3 0.002
AV block at birth 8 3 0.516

Data in bold represents statistically significant data (p < 0.05)

AV atrioventricular

All patients without cardiac dysfunction either prenatally or postnatally and those without hydrops survived at least until 1 year of life (Fig. 1). Postnatal mortality was not statistically different between the first and second half of the study (33 vs. 17 %, p = 0.5).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Outcome of patients with bradycardia/AV block and heterotaxy syndrome

* With cardiac dysfunction in utero

† With cardiac dysfunction post-natally

Discussion

This is the largest reported cohort of patients with heterotaxy syndrome and either sinus bradycardia or congenital AV block who survived the neonatal period. The survival rate in our cohort was greater than previously reported with 63 % surviving beyond 1 year of age. Previous studies have shown that congenital AV block associated with structural heart disease carries a poor prognosis, especially in those with the polysplenia phenotype in heterotaxy syndrome [24, 28]. In those studies, mortality rates ranged from 80 to 100 % [2, 16, 20]. However, the previously reported data come from studies limited to a small number of patients both due to the rarity of the disease and a high rate of elective termination of pregnancy [2, 16, 21, 26]. Similar to previous reports, predictors of mortality in our study included hydrops and ventricular dysfunction with mortality rates of hydropic patients >80 % [2, 7, 15, 16, 21, 22, 26]. Interestingly, low ventricular rates during pregnancy were not associated with increased fetal mortality in our study; however, as noted in other studies [8, 26], low ventricular rates after birth were associated with postnatal death. Therefore, the ventricular rate should not be the sole factor dictating patient management because patients with low escape rates can remain hemodynamically stable in utero. Consequently, allowing these patients to remain in utero with frequent monitoring may lead to better outcomes, especially given that premature delivery can be associated with worse outcome [4, 10, 15].

It should also be noted that patients with sinus bradycardia, not just patients with AV block, were also at risk for poor outcome, with the former comprising 50 % of fetal deaths. This stresses the importance of monitoring those with complete AV block and those with sinus bradycardia because both arrhythmias are at risk for developing cardiac dysfunction and/or hydrops. With the majority of the literature focused solely on AV block alone, it is vital that sinus bradycardia is recognized as a possible risk factor for poor outcomes given its association with mortality and the possibility of progressing to AV block. Awareness of this will help in counseling families at the time of initial diagnosis.

No other heart rate parameters were noted to be associated with mortality. Both high (>160) and low (<120) atrial rates in the setting of AV block have been reportedly associated with poorer outcome [20, 23, 26], although no relationship was noted in this study, similar to a recent report [2]. Progression of heart block or slowing of the escape rate were also not shown to be correlated with mortality, which also conflicts with previous reports [26, 27].

Although the nature of the bradyarrhythmia is unique in patients with heterotaxy syndrome, the risk factors for death were similar to those found in patients with AV block from other etiologies, such as those with immune-mediated AV block [2, 4, 7, 22]. Patients with heterotaxy syndrome and polysplenia are inherently at risk for rhythm disturbances given their lack of right-sided heart structures. Sinus bradycardia may be due to the hypoplasia or absence of the sinus node, a structure related to the right atria [6, 13], whereas those with complete AV block may have a discontinuity between the AV node and His-Purkinje system [13] either due to an initial lack of fusion between AV nodal tissue and the His bundle or due to a secondary interruption of the AV conduction axis [12]. As such, it was not surprising that 6 of our patients with sinus bradycardia went on to develop complete AV block. Although not associated with death, 12 patients subsequently had pacemakers placed. Given the tenuous nature of the cardiac conduction in these polysplenia syndrome patients, expectant parents should be aware of the risk for AV block and counseled accordingly.

Similar to previous studies [2, 16, 20], the greatest attrition in the present series occurred prenatally and immediately postnatally. At a median follow-up of 4 years, only 1 patient died, at 4 months of age, from a cause not related to heart disease. The mortality rates in the present study were lower than those previously reported, although the reasons for this are not entirely clear. The strategy in our perinatal management is to monitor patients closely in the third trimester and let the pregnancy go to as close to full term as is possible. Timing of delivery to minimize fetal compromise and maximize maturity is critical as is the involvement of a multidisciplinary team consisting of obstetricians, neonatologists, cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons. Appropriate inotropic and chronotropic support after birth is imperative to optimize survival. Determining the exact mechanism for bradyarrhythmias in utero can be challenging, especially in patients with structural abnormalities. It is possible that patients diagnosed with significant sinus bradycardia during fetal life may have had complete AV block with isosynchronous atrial and ventricular contractions, which is evident only on postnatal electrocardiograms. A prospective multicenter study may allow for more accurate diagnoses while also better defining responsible for the improved patient survival noted in this study.

Despite the somewhat more encouraging results, this study is limited by the small patient cohort cared for at a single institution. However, it remains the largest cohort of surviving patients reported so far for those with heterotaxy syndrome and bradycardia/complete AV block. Because we did not follow a standardized protocol for the care of these patients, these results reflect a clinical practice in an experienced referral cardiac center taking care of the most severe end of the spectrum of heterotaxy syndrome patients.

In conclusion, the association of complete AV block and heterotaxy syndrome is an uncommon disease with previously reported high mortality rates. However, this study shows that survival of these patients beyond the neonatal period may not be as poor as previously reported. Fetuses with normal cardiac function and without hydrops can be delivered near term, and the survival rate can be expected to be high. Fetuses with heterotaxy syndrome and bradycardia, either sinus or due to AV block, should be closely followed-up during pregnancy to monitor the development of cardiac dysfunction and/or hydrops. The decision for delivery prematurely should not be made on ventricular rate alone.

Acknowledgments

Maria C. Escobar-Diaz is supported by a grant from La Caixa Foundation, Spain.

Contributor Information

Maria C. Escobar-Diaz, Email: mariaclaraescobar@yahoo.es, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Wayne Tworetzky, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Kevin Friedman, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Terra Lafranchi, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Francis Fynn-Thompson, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Mark E. Alexander, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Douglas Y. Mah, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

References

  • 1.Berg C, Geipel A, Smrcek J, Krapp M, Germer U, Kohl T, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of cardiosplenic syndromes: a 10-year experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(5):451–459. doi: 10.1002/uog.904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berg C, Geipel A, Kohl T, Breuer J, Germer U, Krapp M, et al. Atrioventricular block detected in fetal life: associated anomalies and potential prognostic markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(1):4–15. doi: 10.1002/uog.1918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berg C, Geipel A, Kamil D, Knuppel M, Breuer J, Krapp M, et al. The syndrome of left isomerism: sonographic findings and outcome in prenatally diagnosed cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(7):921–931. doi: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.7.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buyon JP, Hiebert R, Copel J, Craft J, Friedman D, Katholi M, et al. Autoimmune-associated congenital heart block: demographics, mortality, morbidity and recurrence rates obtained from a national neonatal lupus registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(7):1658–1666. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00161-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohen MS, Schultz AH, Tian ZY, Donaghue DD, Weinberg PM, Gaynor JW, et al. Heterotaxy syndrome with functional single ventricle: does prenatal diagnosis improve survival? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(5):1629–1636. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dickinson DF, Wilkinson JL, Anderson KR, Smith A, Ho SY, Anderson RH. The cardiac conduction system in situs ambiguus. Circulation. 1979;59(5):879–885. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.5.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eronen M, Siren MK, Ekblad H, Tikanoja T, Julkunen H, Paavilainen T. Short- and long-term outcome of children with congenital complete heart block diagnosed in utero or as a newborn. Pediatrics. 2000;106(1 Pt 1):86–91. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.1.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Eronen M, Heikkila P, Teramo K. Congenital complete heart block in the fetus: hemodynamic features, antenatal treatment, and outcome in six cases. Pediatr Cardiol. 2001;22(5):385–392. doi: 10.1007/s002460010256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gembruch U, Hansmann M, Redel DA, Bald R, Knopfle G. Fetal complete heart block: antenatal diagnosis, significance and management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1989;31(1):9–22. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(89)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Glatz AC, Gaynor JW, Rhodes LA, Rychik J, Tanel RE, Vetter VL, et al. Outcome of high-risk neonates with congenital complete heart block paced in the first 24 h after birth. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(3):767–773. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gottschalk I, Berg C, Heller R. Disorders of laterality and heterotaxy in the foetus. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2012;216(3):122–131. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1314808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ho SY, Cook A, Anderson RH, Allan LD, Fagg N. Isomerism of the atrial appendages in the fetus. Pediatr Pathol. 1991;11(4):589–608. doi: 10.3109/15513819109064792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ho SY, Fagg N, Anderson RH, Cook A, Allan L. Disposition of the atrioventricular conduction tissues in the heart with isomerism of the atrial appendages: its relation to congenital complete heart block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(4):904–910. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90191-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jacobs JP, Anderson RH, Weinberg PM, Walters HL, 3rd, Tchervenkov CI, Del Duca D, et al. The nomenclature, definition and classification of cardiac structures in the setting of heterotaxy. Cardiol Young. 2007;17(Suppl 2):1–28. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jaeggi ET, Hamilton RM, Silverman ED, Zamora SA, Hornberger LK. Outcome of children with fetal, neonatal or childhood diagnosis of isolated congenital atrioventricular block. A single institution’s experience of 30 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(1):130–137. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01697-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jaeggi ET, Hornberger LK, Smallhorn JF, Fouron JC. Prenatal diagnosis of complete atrioventricular block associated with structural heart disease: combined experience of two tertiary care centers and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(1):16–21. doi: 10.1002/uog.1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lim JS, McCrindle BW, Smallhorn JF, Golding F, Caldarone CA, Taketazu M, et al. Clinical features, management, and outcome of children with fetal and postnatal diagnoses of isomerism syndromes. Circulation. 2005;112(16):2454–2461. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.552364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lin AE, Ticho BS, Houde K, Westgate MN, Holmes LB. Heterotaxy: associated conditions and hospital-based prevalence in newborns. Genet Med. 2000;2(3):157–172. doi: 10.1097/00125817-200005000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lin JH, Chang CI, Wang JK, Wu MH, Shyu MK, Lee CN, et al. Intrauterine diagnosis of heterotaxy syndrome. Am Heart J. 2002;143(6):1002–1008. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.122873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lopes LM, Tavares GM, Damiano AP, Lopes MA, Aiello VD, Schultz R, et al. Perinatal outcome of fetal atrioventricular block: one-hundred-sixteen cases from a single institution. Circulation. 2008;118(12):1268–1275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Machado MV, Tynan MJ, Curry PV, Allan LD. Fetal complete heart block. Br Heart J. 1988;60(6):512–515. doi: 10.1136/hrt.60.6.512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maeno Y, Himeno W, Saito A, Hiraishi S, Hirose O, Ikuma M, et al. Clinical course of fetal congenital atrioventricular block in the Japanese population: a multicentre experience. Heart. 2005;91(8):1075–1079. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.033407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Michaelsson M, Engle MA. Congenital complete heart block: an international study of the natural history. Cardiovasc Clin. 1972;4(3):85–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pepes S, Zidere V, Allan LD. Prenatal diagnosis of left atrial isomerism. Heart. 2009;95(24):1974–1977. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.165514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Phoon CK, Villegas MD, Ursell PC, Silverman NH. Left atrial isomerism detected in fetal life. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77(12):1083–1088. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00137-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schmidt KG, Ulmer HE, Silverman NH, Kleinman CS, Copel JA. Perinatal outcome of fetal complete atrioventricular block: a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17(6):1360–1366. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80148-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Swaminathan S, Parthiban A. Progressive fetal atrioventricular block in heterotaxy syndrome. Cardiol Young. 2007;17(4):432–434. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107000868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Taketazu M, Lougheed J, Yoo SJ, Lim JS, Hornberger LK. Spectrum of cardiovascular disease, accuracy of diagnosis, and outcome in fetal heterotaxy syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(5):720–724. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Van Praagh S, Santini F, Sanders S, editors. Nadas pediatric cardiology. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus/Mosby; 1992. Cardiac malpositions with special emphasis on visceral heterotaxy (asplenia and polysplenia syndromes) pp. 589–608. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES