Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2015 Jan 1;71(Pt 1):88–93. doi: 10.1107/S2056989014027054

The crystal structures of four N-(4-halophen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamides

Ligia R Gomes a, John Nicolson Low b,*, Fernando Cagide c, Fernanda Borges c
PMCID: PMC4331845  PMID: 25705460

In four N-(4-halophen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamides, halo = -F, -Cl, -Br and -I, the mol­ecules are essentially planar and exhibit anti conformations with respect to the C—N rotamer of the amide and with cis geometries with respect to the relative positions of the C3arom—C2arom bond of the chromone ring and the carbonyl group of the amide.

Keywords: crystal structure, drug design, chromones, conformation, supra­molecular structure

Abstract

Four N-(4-halophen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamides (halo = F, Cl, Br and I), N-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamide, C16H10FNO3, N-(4-chloro­phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamide, C16H10ClNO3, N-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamide, C16H10BrNO3, N-(4-iodo­phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamide, C16H10INO3, have been structurally characterized. The mol­ecules are essentially planar and each exhibits an anti conformation with respect to the C—N rotamer of the amide and a cis geometry with respect to the relative positions of the Carom—Carom bond of the chromone ring and the carbonyl group of the amide. The structures each exhibit an intra­molecular hydrogen-bonding network comprising an N—H⋯O hydrogen bond between the amide N atom and the O atom of the carbonyl group of the pyrone ring, forming an S(6) ring, and a weak Carom—H⋯O inter­action with the O atom of the carbonyl group of the amide as acceptor, which forms another S(6) ring. All four compounds have the same supra­molecular structure, consisting of R 2 2(13) rings that are propagated along the a-axis direction by unit translation. There is π–π stacking involving inversion-related mol­ecules in each structure.

Chemical context  

Chromones are a group of natural and synthetic oxygen heterocyclic compounds having a high degree of chemical diversity that is frequently linked to a broad array of biological activities (Gaspar et al. 2014). Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a degenerative disorder of the central nervous system with an aetiology not yet completely clarified. There is no cure for PD, but medications, surgery and multidisciplinary management can provide relief from the symptoms. PD seems to be associated with a decrease in central levels of dopamine triggered by oxidative stress. These processes, among other factors, are mediated by the isoform B of the mono­amino oxidase (MAO-B). Hence, the search for novel agents that can selectively inhibit MAO-B is of paramount relevance. In this context, the decoration of chromone, a privileged structure for the discovery and development of new chemical entities (NCEs), have led to the preparation of chromone carboxamides and to promising outcomes since preliminary data indicate that chromone-3-carboxamides are selective MAO-B inhibitors (Gaspar, Reis et al., 2011; Gaspar, Silva et al., 2011).

Previous results showed that the carbonyl group of the chromone moiety and the amide function play an important role in the establishment of hydrogen inter­actions with the MAO-B active pocket. In addition, the presence of a phenyl substituent attached to the amide seems to play a pivotal role in the potency conveyed by the ligand (Helguera et al., 2013). In this context, some N-(4-halophen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamides (1)–(4), shown in the scheme, have been synthesized and structurally characterized in order to rationalize the structural factors that may affect the selectivity and the potency of their inhibitory activities towards MAO-B. These structures are compared with N-(4-phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxamide and N-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxamide, compounds (5) and (6) (Reis et al., 2013; Gomes et al., 2013), which do not show inhibitory activities against human MAO-B.graphic file with name e-71-00088-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

The structural analysis of (1)–(4) confirmed them to be N-(4-halophen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamides with halosubstituents F (Fig. 1), Cl (Fig. 2), Br (Fig. 3) and I (Fig. 4), respectively, as depicted in the scheme. Figs. 1–4 show the displacement ellipsoid diagrams with the adopted labelling schemes. All compounds crystallize in the space group P Inline graphic. Compounds (1) and (2) are isostructural, as are compounds (3) and (4). The cell lengths are very similar in each pair of compounds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A view of the asymmetric unit of (1), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 80% probability level. Dashed lines indicate the intra­molecular contacts.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A view of the asymmetric unit of (2), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 80% probability level. Dashed lines indicate the intra­molecular contacts.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A view of the asymmetric unit of (3), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 80% probability level. Dashed lines indicate the intra­molecular contacts.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A view of the asymmetric unit of (4), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 80% probability level. Dashed lines indicate the intra­molecular contacts.

The title compounds display similar structures, which are reflected in the mol­ecular geometries and conformations; the values of the dihedral angles between the mean planes of the chromone ring and the exocyclic phenyl ring of the N-phenyl-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamides are close to 2° in the case of the F, Cl pair [2.51 (3) and 1.95 (7)°, respectively,] and close to 5° for the Br, I pair [4.90 (10) and 5.37 (10)°, respectively]. In N-phenyl-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxamide (5) (Reis et al., 2013), the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the chromone ring and the phenyl ring is 6.57° and in N-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxamide (6), the structural isomer of (3) (Gomes et al., 2013), the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the chromone ring and the phenyl ring is 5.0 (2)°. Selected dihedral angles are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Selected dihedral angles ().

1 is the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the chromene and phenyl rings and the phenyl ring. 2 is the dihedral angle between the mean plane of the chromone ring and the plane defined by atoms O2, C31 and N3. 3 is the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the phenyl ring and the plane defined by atoms O3, C31 and N3.

Compound 1 2 3
(1) 2.51(3) 5.51(12) 5.05(13)
(2) 1.95(7) 5.7(3) 4.4(3)
(3) 4.90(10) 2.0(4) 2.9(4)
(4) 5.37(10) 1.8(4) 3.6(4)

In (1) and (2), the maximum deviations from the mean plane of the 10 atoms of the chromone ring plus the three carboxamide atoms O3, C31 and N3, are 0.1220 (8) and 0.1319 (17) Å, respectively, both for atom O3 (r.m.s. deviations of fitted atoms = 0.0519 and 0.0571 Å, respectively). In (3) and (4), the deviations of O3 from the mean plane defined above are 0.0384 (14) and 0.0342 (15) Å, respectively (r.m.s. deviations of fitted atoms = 0.0314 Å in both compounds). In the case of (3) and (4), atom C2 shows the greatest deviation from the mean plane having deviations of 0.0569 (18) and 0.0596 (18) Å, respectively. These values indicate that the carboxamide groups are practically planar with the chromone ring, particularly in the case of the Br and I chromone carboxamide derivatives. This planarity may be related to the inter­nal hydrogen-bond pattern in those mol­ecules, which thus defines the mol­ecular conformations.

The conformational features herein established are probably most relevant for the extrapolation of the inhibitory MAO-B activities of chromone carboxamides as they are related to the inter­molecular forces responsible for enzyme–ligand binding affinity. The data can explain the MAO-B selectivity found for chromone-3-carboxamides (1)–(4), as opposed to the lack of activity presented by chromone-2-carboxamides (5) and (6). As seen in the scheme, (1)–(4) are N-(phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamides while (5) and (6) are N-(phen­yl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxamides. As can be seen in Fig. 5, an anti conformation is adopted with respect to the C—N rotamer of the amide in all of the compounds. Nevertheless, due to the asymmetry of the chromone residue, the anti conformation can assume a cis (a) or trans (b) geometry with respect to the relative position of the carbonyl O atom of the carboxamide and the C2arom—C3arom bond of the chromone. Compounds (1)–(4) exhibit a cis relation between these bonds, as can be seen in the ellipsoid diagrams, Figs. 1–4 . This mol­ecular conformation permits the formation of two intra­molecular hydrogen bonds, which generate a network that probably enhances their planarity. Details of the intra­molecular hydrogen-bonding inter­actions are given in Tables 2 to 5. Specifically for each mol­ecule, there is an intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond between the amide nitro­gen and the oxygen atom of the carbonyl group, O4, of the chromone ring, forming an S(6) ring identified as ring C. In addition, the carbonyl oxygen of the amide, O3, acts as the acceptor for a weak inter­action with an ortho hydrogen of the exocyclic phenyl ring, forming another S(6) ring, B. The corresponding trans structures (top right in Fig. 5) would probably only allow the formation of a weak hydrogen-bonding inter­action with an ortho hydrogen atom of the exocyclic phenyl ring. It is inter­esting to compare the inter­nal hydrogen-bonding network presented by the title compounds with those of the analogous 4-oxo-N-(substituted phen­yl)-4H-chromene-2-carboxamides (Reis et al., 2013) and (Gomes et al., 2013), compounds (5) and (6). Previous studies concerning the structures of the chromone-2-carboxamides show that the majority have geometries similar to compound (5), e.g. as in (1)–(4), they assume a cis conformation, but this is not the case for (6), the bromo isomer of (3), as shown in Fig. 5 (bottom right). In spite of this, none of this type of derivative displays inhibitory activity towards the MAO-B isoenzyme. When the geometries of the relative positions of rings D and E of the chromone residue with respect to rings A and B are compared, it can be seen that the effect of the 2/3 positional isomerism is to ‘reflect’ their relative positions while the effect of the cis/trans conformations is a ‘twofold rotation’ of the rings around the Camide— Cchromone bond. Those particular differences in conformation may condition the ability for docking when pharmacological activities are considered.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Anti-rotamer conformations around the C—N rotamer for the 3-carboxamides (top) and for the 2-carboxamide isomers (bottom), showing the relative positions of the C3arom—C2arom bond of the chromone ring with respect to the carb­oxy­lic group of the amide: cis (right) or trans (left) geometries.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (1) .

DHA DH HA D A DHA
N3H3O4 0.896(17) 1.901(17) 2.7024(13) 147.9(15)
C312H312O3 0.95 2.26 2.8714(15) 122
C2H2O4i 0.95 2.45 3.1645(14) 132
C316H316O3ii 0.95 2.46 3.3160(14) 149

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Table 3. Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (2) .

DHA DH HA D A DHA
N3H3O4 0.85(3) 1.92(3) 2.680(3) 148(3)
C312H312O3 0.95 2.29 2.892(3) 121
C2H2O4i 0.95 2.47 3.194(3) 133
C316H316O3ii 0.95 2.45 3.286(3) 146

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Table 4. Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (3) .

DHA DH HA D A DHA
N3H3O4 0.86(2) 1.95(2) 2.695(2) 145(2)
C312H312O3 0.95 2.26 2.877(2) 129
C2H2O4i 0.95 2.41 3.167(2) 137
C316H316O3ii 0.95 2.47 3.314(2) 148

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Table 5. Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (4) .

DHA DH HA D A DHA
N3H3O4 0.92(2) 1.89(2) 2.6977(19) 145(2)
C2H2O3 0.95 2.33 2.718(2) 104
C312H312O3 0.95 2.27 2.881(2) 122
C2H2O4i 0.95 2.44 3.185(2) 136
C316H316O3ii 0.95 2.49 3.312(2) 145

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Supra­molecular features  

Inter­molecular hydrogen-bonding information is given in Table 2 to 5. All compounds have the same supra­molecular structure in which the C2—H2⋯O4(x + 1, y, z) and C316—H316⋯O3(x − 1, y, z) form Inline graphic(13) ring structures, which are propagated along the a-axis direction by unit translation. Fig. 6 shows the Cl compound, (3), as an example.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The distorted ladder formed by linked Inline graphic(13) rings in compound (3). The chain runs parallel to the a axis. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by blue dashed lines. Hydrogen atoms not involved in the hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity. A similar structure is found for compound (1) and all the halo-substituted compounds. [Symmetry codes: (i) x + 1, y, z; (ii) x − 1, y, x.]

There is π–π stacking in each compound, involving inversion-related mol­ecules in all compounds, Table 6.

Table 6. stacking (, ).

Cg1, Cg2, Cg3 and Cg7 [compound (6)] are the centroids of the rings containing atoms O1, C5, C311 and C211 [compound (6)], respectively. In contacts indicated *, the planes involved are inclined to each other, the perpendicular distance between the planes is an average value and the angle between the planes is given in place of a slippage. Only interplanar interactions with Cg Cg distances 4.0 and with angles between the planes of 10 are included.

Compound contact distance perp. dist. angle between planes
(1) Cg1Cg3iii 3.5187(8) 3.3226* 1.77(6)*
  Cg1Cg3iv 3.543(8) 3.3719* 1.77(6)*
(2) Cg1Cg3v 3.5341(17) 3.3573* 0.77(13)*
  Cg2Cg3vi 3.6691(17) 3.3985* 3.14(13)*
(3) Cg1Cg3v 3.5464(11) 3.3342* 4.66(9)*
(4) Cg1Cg3iii 3.5721(11) 3.3518* 5.37(9)

Symmetry codes: (iii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iv) x, y+2, z; (v) x+1, y, z+1; (vi) x, y, z.

Synthesis and crystallization  

The title compounds were obtained by synthetic strategies described elsewhere (Cagide et al., 2011). Chromone-3-carboxamides were synthesized using chromone-3-carb­oxy­lic acid as starting material which, after in situ activation with phospho­rus(V) oxychloride (POCl3) in di­methyl­formamide, react with the different haloanilines. Recrystallization from di­chloro­methane afforded colourless plates whose dimensions are given in Table 7.

Table 7. Experimental details.

  (1) (2) (3) (4)
Crystal data
Chemical formula C16H10FNO3 C16H10ClNO3 C16H10BrNO3 C16H10INO3
M r 283.25 299.70 344.16 391.15
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, P Inline graphic Triclinic, P Inline graphic Triclinic, P Inline graphic Triclinic, P Inline graphic
Temperature (K) 100 100 120 120
a, b, c () 6.6213(5), 7.0517(5), 14.0864(10) 6.6325(12), 7.0577(12), 14.671(3) 6.6505(5), 9.3580(7), 11.0060(8) 6.6750(5), 9.4166(7), 11.2673(8)
, , () 101.957(7), 90.047(6), 106.657(7) 103.536(7), 89.714(6), 105.589(7) 100.280(6), 90.461(6), 100.884(6) 100.974(6), 90.769(6), 100.062(6)
V (3) 615.17(8) 641.9(2) 661.24(9) 683.77(9)
Z 2 2 2 2
Radiation type Mo K Mo K Mo K Mo K
(mm1) 0.12 0.31 3.12 2.35
Crystal size (mm) 0.46 0.32 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.58 0.18 0.06 0.46 0.22 0.05
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku Saturn724+ Rigaku AFC12 Rigaku R-AXIS conversion Rigaku R-AXIS conversion
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrystalClear-SM Expert; Rigaku, 2012) Multi-scan (CrystalClear-SM Expert; Rigaku, 2012) Multi-scan (CrystalClear-SM Expert; Rigaku, 2012) Multi-scan (CrystalClear-SM Expert; Rigaku, 2012)
T min, T max 0.949, 0.998 0.950, 0.988 0.265, 0.835 0.411, 0.892
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections 8176, 2789, 2393 7435, 2265, 1668 9930, 3017, 2525 10032, 3095, 2819
R int 0.056 0.078 0.045 0.026
(sin /)max (1) 0.649 0.598 0.649 0.649
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.044, 0.135, 1.06 0.056, 0.145, 0.99 0.027, 0.058, 0.94 0.018, 0.044, 1.03
No. of reflections 2789 2265 3017 3095
No. of parameters 194 194 194 194
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3) 0.41, 0.27 0.30, 0.65 0.53, 0.69 0.67, 0.32

Computer programs: CrystalClear-SM Expert (Rigaku, 2012), SHELXS97 and SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2009) Flipper 25 (Oszlnyi St, 2004), OSCAIL (McArdle et al., 2004), ShelXle (Hbschle et al., 2011), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006) and OSCAIL (McArdle et al., 2004).

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 7. Amino H atoms were located in difference Fourier maps and were refined isotropically. All other H atoms were treated as riding atoms with C—H(aromatic) = 0.95 Å, U iso= 1.2Ueq(C).

Compounds (1) and (2), reduced cell: [a = 6.6325 (12), b = 0.0577 (12), c = 14.671 (3) Å, α = 76.464 (7), β = 89.714 (6), γ = 74.411 (7)°, V = 641.9 (2) Å3], have different reduced cells in which the x and z coordinates are comparable and the y coordinate of (2) is close to 1 − y of (1). For ease of comparison of the structures of (1) and (2), the refinement reported here was carried out for the non-reduced cell of (2) in which the α and γ angles were given the supplementary values of those of the reduced unit cell. The coordinates of (1) were used as starting values and the transformation matrix for the reduced to non-reduced cell was Inline graphic 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Inline graphic. This gave the same final refinement values as those for the refinement with the reduced cell. Compounds (1) and (2) are therefore isostructural.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh5743sup1.cif

e-71-00088-sup1.cif (2.5MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 1. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57431sup2.hkl

e-71-00088-1sup2.hkl (153.2KB, hkl)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 2. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57432sup3.hkl

e-71-00088-2sup3.hkl (124.6KB, hkl)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 3. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57433sup4.hkl

e-71-00088-3sup4.hkl (165.7KB, hkl)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 4. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57434sup5.hkl

e-71-00088-4sup5.hkl (169.9KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57431sup6.cml

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57432sup7.cml

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57433sup8.cml

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57434sup9.cml

CCDC references: 1038511, 1038510, 1038509, 1038508

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Crystallographic Service, University of Southampton for the data collection, (3a) and (3c), and for their help and advice (Coles & Gale, 2012). Thanks are also due the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) of Portugal (PEst-C/QUI/UI0081/2013). FC’s (SFRH/BPD/74491/2010) grant is also supported by the FCT.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C16H10INO3 Z = 2
Mr = 391.15 F(000) = 380
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.900 Mg m3
a = 6.6750 (5) Å Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
b = 9.4166 (7) Å Cell parameters from 9236 reflections
c = 11.2673 (8) Å θ = 1.8–27.5°
α = 100.974 (6)° µ = 2.35 mm1
β = 90.769 (6)° T = 120 K
γ = 100.062 (6)° Plate, colourless
V = 683.77 (9) Å3 0.46 × 0.22 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Rigaku RAXIS conversion diffractometer 3095 independent reflections
Radiation source: Sealed Tube 2819 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite Monochromator monochromator Rint = 0.026
Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.2°
profile data from ω–scans h = −7→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear-SM Expert; Rigaku, 20112) k = −12→11
Tmin = 0.411, Tmax = 0.892 l = −14→14
10032 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.044 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.026P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03 (Δ/σ)max = 0.002
3095 reflections Δρmax = 0.67 e Å3
194 parameters Δρmin = −0.32 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
I314 0.09431 (2) 0.28556 (2) 0.97093 (2) 0.02278 (5)
O1 0.88205 (19) 0.94124 (14) 0.35573 (11) 0.0188 (3)
O3 0.7838 (2) 0.68549 (15) 0.60794 (12) 0.0219 (3)
O4 0.28854 (19) 0.79085 (14) 0.42255 (11) 0.0199 (3)
N3 0.4362 (2) 0.65097 (16) 0.58280 (13) 0.0152 (3)
H3 0.337 (3) 0.678 (2) 0.5384 (19) 0.017 (5)*
C2 0.8340 (3) 0.85191 (19) 0.43445 (15) 0.0166 (3)
H2 0.9434 0.8230 0.4731 0.020*
C3 0.6432 (3) 0.79929 (17) 0.46363 (14) 0.0144 (3)
C4 0.4692 (3) 0.83443 (18) 0.40253 (14) 0.0144 (3)
C4A 0.5235 (3) 0.92875 (18) 0.31366 (14) 0.0149 (3)
C5 0.3733 (3) 0.9701 (2) 0.24576 (16) 0.0193 (4)
H5 0.2334 0.9352 0.2557 0.023*
C6 0.4280 (3) 1.0611 (2) 0.16480 (16) 0.0221 (4)
H6 0.3257 1.0865 0.1176 0.026*
C7 0.6338 (3) 1.1164 (2) 0.15168 (16) 0.0217 (4)
H7 0.6696 1.1811 0.0971 0.026*
C8 0.7853 (3) 1.0777 (2) 0.21751 (16) 0.0211 (4)
H8 0.9249 1.1154 0.2094 0.025*
C8A 0.7265 (3) 0.98182 (19) 0.29605 (15) 0.0167 (3)
C311 0.3707 (3) 0.56515 (18) 0.66915 (14) 0.0147 (3)
C312 0.5034 (3) 0.52301 (19) 0.74728 (15) 0.0170 (3)
H312 0.6466 0.5501 0.7426 0.020*
C313 0.4242 (3) 0.4409 (2) 0.83219 (15) 0.0183 (3)
H313 0.5134 0.4119 0.8857 0.022*
C314 0.2148 (3) 0.40150 (18) 0.83828 (15) 0.0167 (3)
C315 0.0823 (3) 0.44141 (19) 0.75977 (15) 0.0178 (3)
H315 −0.0608 0.4127 0.7637 0.021*
C316 0.1603 (3) 0.52325 (19) 0.67578 (15) 0.0171 (3)
H316 0.0702 0.5512 0.6221 0.020*
C31 0.6294 (3) 0.70661 (18) 0.55846 (15) 0.0154 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
I314 0.02679 (8) 0.02415 (7) 0.01880 (6) 0.00303 (5) 0.00371 (4) 0.00890 (4)
O1 0.0120 (6) 0.0209 (6) 0.0242 (6) 0.0014 (5) 0.0022 (5) 0.0074 (5)
O3 0.0143 (6) 0.0284 (7) 0.0258 (7) 0.0053 (5) −0.0013 (5) 0.0108 (5)
O4 0.0116 (6) 0.0256 (7) 0.0248 (6) 0.0024 (5) 0.0016 (5) 0.0116 (5)
N3 0.0136 (7) 0.0169 (7) 0.0164 (7) 0.0040 (6) −0.0002 (5) 0.0057 (5)
C2 0.0139 (8) 0.0165 (8) 0.0192 (8) 0.0035 (6) −0.0004 (6) 0.0027 (6)
C3 0.0138 (8) 0.0129 (8) 0.0158 (7) 0.0027 (6) 0.0005 (6) 0.0005 (6)
C4 0.0132 (8) 0.0146 (8) 0.0151 (7) 0.0027 (6) 0.0006 (6) 0.0018 (6)
C4A 0.0157 (9) 0.0141 (8) 0.0146 (7) 0.0031 (6) 0.0021 (6) 0.0017 (6)
C5 0.0169 (9) 0.0217 (9) 0.0195 (8) 0.0036 (7) 0.0019 (6) 0.0045 (6)
C6 0.0260 (10) 0.0246 (9) 0.0186 (8) 0.0088 (8) 0.0007 (7) 0.0078 (7)
C7 0.0283 (10) 0.0197 (9) 0.0198 (8) 0.0066 (7) 0.0080 (7) 0.0078 (6)
C8 0.0202 (10) 0.0193 (9) 0.0236 (9) 0.0024 (7) 0.0066 (7) 0.0047 (7)
C8A 0.0161 (9) 0.0155 (8) 0.0181 (8) 0.0035 (6) 0.0026 (6) 0.0016 (6)
C311 0.0166 (9) 0.0127 (8) 0.0145 (7) 0.0034 (6) 0.0011 (6) 0.0014 (6)
C312 0.0147 (9) 0.0183 (8) 0.0186 (8) 0.0041 (7) −0.0002 (6) 0.0038 (6)
C313 0.0199 (9) 0.0198 (8) 0.0164 (8) 0.0065 (7) −0.0023 (6) 0.0038 (6)
C314 0.0203 (9) 0.0148 (8) 0.0149 (7) 0.0018 (7) 0.0026 (6) 0.0039 (6)
C315 0.0148 (9) 0.0199 (9) 0.0183 (8) 0.0030 (7) 0.0018 (6) 0.0029 (6)
C316 0.0164 (9) 0.0171 (8) 0.0184 (8) 0.0055 (7) −0.0014 (6) 0.0027 (6)
C31 0.0161 (9) 0.0140 (8) 0.0157 (7) 0.0036 (6) 0.0007 (6) 0.0010 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

I314—C314 2.1023 (17) C6—C7 1.401 (3)
O1—C2 1.340 (2) C6—H6 0.9500
O1—C8A 1.376 (2) C7—C8 1.385 (3)
O3—C31 1.229 (2) C7—H7 0.9500
O4—C4 1.243 (2) C8—C8A 1.394 (2)
N3—C31 1.357 (2) C8—H8 0.9500
N3—C311 1.406 (2) C311—C312 1.397 (2)
N3—H3 0.92 (2) C311—C316 1.398 (3)
C2—C3 1.352 (2) C312—C313 1.395 (3)
C2—H2 0.9500 C312—H312 0.9500
C3—C4 1.460 (2) C313—C314 1.388 (3)
C3—C31 1.497 (2) C313—H313 0.9500
C4—C4A 1.469 (2) C314—C315 1.389 (2)
C4A—C8A 1.390 (2) C315—C316 1.383 (2)
C4A—C5 1.404 (2) C315—H315 0.9500
C5—C6 1.377 (3) C316—H316 0.9500
C5—H5 0.9500
C2—O1—C8A 118.48 (14) C7—C8—H8 121.0
C31—N3—C311 128.55 (15) C8A—C8—H8 121.0
C31—N3—H3 114.0 (15) O1—C8A—C4A 121.30 (15)
C311—N3—H3 117.4 (15) O1—C8A—C8 116.04 (16)
O1—C2—C3 125.61 (16) C4A—C8A—C8 122.66 (17)
O1—C2—H2 117.2 C312—C311—C316 119.80 (16)
C3—C2—H2 117.2 C312—C311—N3 123.60 (16)
C2—C3—C4 119.41 (15) C316—C311—N3 116.59 (15)
C2—C3—C31 115.53 (15) C313—C312—C311 119.53 (17)
C4—C3—C31 125.07 (15) C313—C312—H312 120.2
O4—C4—C3 124.22 (16) C311—C312—H312 120.2
O4—C4—C4A 121.28 (16) C314—C313—C312 119.87 (16)
C3—C4—C4A 114.49 (15) C314—C313—H313 120.1
C8A—C4A—C5 118.05 (16) C312—C313—H313 120.1
C8A—C4A—C4 120.59 (16) C313—C314—C315 120.84 (16)
C5—C4A—C4 121.35 (16) C313—C314—I314 120.05 (13)
C6—C5—C4A 120.26 (18) C315—C314—I314 119.08 (13)
C6—C5—H5 119.9 C316—C315—C314 119.42 (17)
C4A—C5—H5 119.9 C316—C315—H315 120.3
C5—C6—C7 120.37 (18) C314—C315—H315 120.3
C5—C6—H6 119.8 C315—C316—C311 120.53 (16)
C7—C6—H6 119.8 C315—C316—H316 119.7
C8—C7—C6 120.65 (17) C311—C316—H316 119.7
C8—C7—H7 119.7 O3—C31—N3 124.75 (16)
C6—C7—H7 119.7 O3—C31—C3 121.00 (16)
C7—C8—C8A 117.95 (17) N3—C31—C3 114.25 (15)
C8A—O1—C2—C3 −1.7 (2) C4—C4A—C8A—C8 −176.55 (16)
O1—C2—C3—C4 3.0 (3) C7—C8—C8A—O1 177.28 (15)
O1—C2—C3—C31 −177.33 (15) C7—C8—C8A—C4A −2.4 (3)
C2—C3—C4—O4 179.64 (16) C31—N3—C311—C312 0.3 (3)
C31—C3—C4—O4 0.0 (3) C31—N3—C311—C316 179.48 (16)
C2—C3—C4—C4A −0.9 (2) C316—C311—C312—C313 −0.7 (2)
C31—C3—C4—C4A 179.46 (15) N3—C311—C312—C313 178.37 (16)
O4—C4—C4A—C8A 177.21 (15) C311—C312—C313—C314 0.1 (3)
C3—C4—C4A—C8A −2.3 (2) C312—C313—C314—C315 0.8 (3)
O4—C4—C4A—C5 −1.7 (3) C312—C313—C314—I314 −177.36 (13)
C3—C4—C4A—C5 178.81 (15) C313—C314—C315—C316 −1.0 (3)
C8A—C4A—C5—C6 −0.2 (3) I314—C314—C315—C316 177.17 (12)
C4—C4A—C5—C6 178.65 (16) C314—C315—C316—C311 0.3 (3)
C4A—C5—C6—C7 −1.7 (3) C312—C311—C316—C315 0.5 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C8 1.6 (3) N3—C311—C316—C315 −178.64 (15)
C6—C7—C8—C8A 0.4 (3) C311—N3—C31—O3 2.5 (3)
C2—O1—C8A—C4A −1.8 (2) C311—N3—C31—C3 −177.41 (15)
C2—O1—C8A—C8 178.47 (15) C2—C3—C31—O3 2.3 (2)
C5—C4A—C8A—O1 −177.34 (15) C4—C3—C31—O3 −178.01 (15)
C4—C4A—C8A—O1 3.7 (2) C2—C3—C31—N3 −177.74 (14)
C5—C4A—C8A—C8 2.4 (3) C4—C3—C31—N3 1.9 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N3—H3···O4 0.92 (2) 1.89 (2) 2.6977 (19) 145 (2)
C2—H2···O3 0.95 2.33 2.718 (2) 104
C312—H312···O3 0.95 2.27 2.881 (2) 122
C2—H2···O4i 0.95 2.44 3.185 (2) 136
C316—H316···O3ii 0.95 2.49 3.312 (2) 145

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) x−1, y, z.

References

  1. Cagide, F., Reis, J., Gaspar, A. & Borges, F. (2011). Tetrahedron Lett. 52, 6446–6449.
  2. Coles, S. J. & Gale, P. A. (2012). Chem. Sci. 3, 683–689.
  3. Gaspar, A., Matos, M. J., Garrido, J., Uriarte, E. & Borges, F. (2014). Chem. Rev. 114, 4960–4992. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Gaspar, A., Reis, J., Fonseca, A., Milhazes, N., Viña, D., Uriarte, E. & Borges, F. (2011). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21, 707–709. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Gaspar, A., Silva, T., Yáñez, M., Vina, D., Orallo, F., Ortuso, F., Uriarte, E., Alcaro, S. & Borges, F. (2011). J. Med. Chem. 54, 5165–5173. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Gomes, L. R., Low, J. N., Cagide, F., Gaspar, A., Reis, J. & Borges, F. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 294–309. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Helguera, A. M., Pérez-Garrido, A., Gaspar, A., Reis, J., Cagide, F., Vina, D., Cordeiro, M. N. D. S. & Borges, F. (2013). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 59, 75–90. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Hübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M. & Dittrich, B. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281–1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.
  10. McArdle, P., Gilligan, K., Cunningham, D., Dark, R. & Mahon, M. (2004). CrystEngComm, 6, 30–309.
  11. Oszlányi, G. & Sütő, A. (2004). Acta Cryst. A60, 134–141. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Reis, J., Gaspar, A., Borges, F., Gomes, L. R. & Low, J. N. (2013). Acta Cryst. C69, 1527–1533. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Rigaku (2012). CrystalClear-SM Expert. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  14. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh5743sup1.cif

e-71-00088-sup1.cif (2.5MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 1. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57431sup2.hkl

e-71-00088-1sup2.hkl (153.2KB, hkl)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 2. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57432sup3.hkl

e-71-00088-2sup3.hkl (124.6KB, hkl)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 3. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57433sup4.hkl

e-71-00088-3sup4.hkl (165.7KB, hkl)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 4. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57434sup5.hkl

e-71-00088-4sup5.hkl (169.9KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57431sup6.cml

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57432sup7.cml

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57433sup8.cml

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014027054/lh57434sup9.cml

CCDC references: 1038511, 1038510, 1038509, 1038508

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES