Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2015 Jan 30;3(2):apps.1400101. doi: 10.3732/apps.1400101

Isolation and characterization of 22 EST-SSR markers for the genus Thujopsis (Cupressaceae)1

Miyako Sato 2, Yoichi Hasegawa 2, Kentaro Mishima 3, Katsuhiko Takata 2,4
PMCID: PMC4332144  PMID: 25699219

Abstract

• Premise of the study: Expressed sequence tag–simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) markers were developed from Thujopsis dolabrata var. hondae (Cupressaceae) using Illumina sequencing to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of the genus Thujopsis.

• Methods and Results: Twenty-two primer pairs were developed from ESTs of T. dolabrata var. hondae. The primers amplified di- and trinucleotide repeat-containing sequences. Polymorphisms were assessed in 81 individuals from two T. dolabrata var. hondae populations and one T. dolabrata population. The number of alleles ranged from one to 17 per locus. The observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.000 to 1.000 and from 0.000 to 0.926, respectively.

• Conclusions: These new EST-SSR markers will be useful in analyses of the genetic diversity and population structure of the genus Thujopsis.

Keywords: Cupressaceae, expressed sequence tag, microsatellite, next-generation sequencing, Thujopsis

The Cupressaceae clade has the broadest diversity of habitats and morphologies of any conifer family, and the genus Thujopsis, which belongs to the Cupressaceae, is considered to be one of the early diverging genera (Pittermann et al., 2012). Thujopsis is native to Japan and includes one species (T. dolabrata Siebold & Zucc.) and one northern variety (T. dolabrata var. hondae Makino) (Hayashi, 1960). The two varieties of Thujopsis are distinguished by variation in their cone morphology. The varieties also differ in their geographic ranges, although their distributions overlap in the central region of the Japanese archipelago (Hayashi, 1960). Thujopsis dolabrata has antimicrobial properties and demonstrates a strong antifeedant effect on termites (Inamori et al., 2006). Moreover, its essential oil is used as an antibacterial agent and as an aromatic substance. Thus, T. dolabrata is an important tree species in Japanese forestry and future forest tree breeding because of its superior wood properties. However, there have been few reports about genetic differences between the two varieties.

Recently, expressed sequence tag (EST)–based markers have been used increasingly in studies of genetic diversity and population structure in tree species (e.g., Fageria and Rajora, 2013). EST-based markers are less susceptible to null alleles than anonymous simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Moreover, because ESTs correspond to coding DNA, the flanking sequences of EST-SSRs are located in well-conserved regions across phylogenetically related species (Uchiyama et al., 2013). Nuclear SSR markers have been developed for T. dolabrata var. hondae (Mishima et al., 2012), and population genetics and phylogeographic analyses of this variety were performed using these markers (Higuchi et al., 2012). However, the nuclear SSR markers have not been tested on T. dolabrata. An analysis of the genetic diversity and population structure for Thujopsis plants in the Japanese archipelago is urgently required. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain molecular markers with high transferability within the genus Thujopsis that also exhibit a low frequency of null alleles. In this paper, we describe the development and characterization of 22 EST-SSR markers for the genus Thujopsis from expressed sequence data of T. dolabrata var. hondae.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One T. dolabrata var. hondae individual (voucher no. TF-K12-001) was used for the RNA sequencing experiment. Leaves and cambiums were sampled from a population in the Aomori Prefecture (Owani: 40°27′21″N, 140°34′08″E) and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −30°C. The cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method was used to extract the total RNAs (Chang et al., 1993). A TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) was used to create the RNA sequencing library, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A HiSeq 1000 (Illumina) was used to sequence the library with 2 × 101-bp paired-end reads. More than 237.24 million paired-end raw reads were obtained. After removal of low-quality reads, 233.92 million clean reads remained (accession no.: DRA002435). Using the short reads assembly programs Velvet 1.2.08 (Zerbino et al., 2009) and Oases 0.2.08 (Schulz et al., 2012), the clean reads were assembled de novo into 76,377 contigs and 41,182 unigenes, from 100 to 14,834 bp, with a mean length of 1525 bp. MSATCOMMANDER 1.0.8 (Faircloth, 2008) was used to screen for microsatellite loci containing di- and trinucleotides. Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999) was then used to design PCR primers. The minimum number of repeats was set as nine and 11 for di- and trinucleotide repeats, respectively. All forward primers were fluorescently labeled using FAM (carboxyfluorescein) with the 454A adapter sequence (5′-GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAG-3′) at the 5′-end (Blacket et al., 2012). Additionally, all reverse primers were attached to a PIG-tail sequence (5′-GTTTCTT-3′) at the 5′-end of the sequence (Brownstein et al., 1996).

The CTAB method (Murray and Thompson, 1980) was used to extract genomic DNAs from needles sampled from 32 T. dolabrata plants in the Nagano Prefecture (Kiso: 35°43′38″N, 137°37′15″E) and 49 T. dolabrata var. hondae needles were sampled from two populations in the Aomori Prefecture (Owani: 40°27′21″N, 140°34′08″E; and Okoppe: 41°28′42″N, 140°57′10″E). These populations were located in the typical range of each variety. To confirm PCR amplification, we used eight DNA samples from four individuals per variety. PCR was performed in a final volume of 10 μL, containing 5 μL of 2× GoTaq Hot Start Colorless Master Mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), 1 μM of each primer, and 60 ng of template DNA. Reactions were performed with initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min; followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and then 72°C for 5 min using an ABI 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). The PCR products were separated electrophoretically on 1% agarose gels and stained with GelRed Nucleic Acid (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). To confirm the presence of SSRs, we sequenced the PCR products from two DNA samples using an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). For fragment analysis, the PCR conditions were modified. The concentration of the primers were 0.15, 0.5, and 0.2 μM for the forward primer, reverse primer, and 454A-FAM primer, respectively, and the number of PCR cycles was 30. PCR products for 81 DNA samples from two varieties were electrophoresed on an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and Geneious 7.0.4 software (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand; http://www.geneious.com/) was used to assess the fragment sizes. To characterize the microsatellite loci, CERVUS 3.0 software (Kalinowski et al., 2007) was used to calculate the number of alleles (A), the observed heterozygosity (Ho), the expected heterozygosity (He), and the frequency of null alleles (r). GenAlEx 6.501 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012) assessed the probability of identity (PID).

Primer3 designed 58 primer pairs, of which 33 showed amplification for all eight samples in both varieties. For 29 of the 33 primer pairs, the SSR sequence in the PCR product was identified for both varieties. Finally, 22 of the 29 amplified primers showed clear fragment patterns, thus they were selected as the developed markers. These primer pairs show different fragment sizes and the same annealing temperature (Table 1). All 22 loci were polymorphic in both varieties. The observed number of alleles per population ranged from one to 17, Ho ranged from 0.000 to 1.000, and He ranged from 0.000 to 0.926. The PID ranged from 0.015 to 1.000 (Table 2). One of the loci (Tdest54) showed high r values relative to the other loci. These 22 EST-SSR markers had lower r and higher PID values compared with reported SSR markers developed from the genomic DNA of T. dolabrata var. hondae (Mishima et al., 2012).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 22 EST-SSR loci for use in the genus Thujopsis.

DDBJ accession no.
Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′) Repeat motif Ta (°C) Allele size range (bp) 1a 2b
Tdest1 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGGATTTTCTGACAGGCTTTGTTCTC (CT)11 60 137–173 LC010288 LC010310
R: GTTTCTTAATTCCCAAGAGTGCTTATGAGTTC
Tdest3 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGCGGCCCAGGTTTCTGTACTC (AT)11 60 169–186 LC010289 LC010311
R: GTTTCTTGCCCATTAAAGTCGGGTATTG
Tdest11 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGTGGGATACATACTGCATTTGTTAGG (AT)12 60 138–161 LC010290 LC010312
R: GTTTCTTCTCCCCAAGCAAGTCACCAC
Tdest14 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGCAGTAGACAATTTCTGCAAATCACC (AG)12 60 157–185 LC010291 LC010313
R: GTTTCTTTCCCTTTTGTTGGCATTATAGG
Tdest17 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGGCTTTTGATGTCCGCTATATCCTC (AG)12 60 159–168 LC010292 LC010314
R: GTTTCTTGGAGATTCCAATGTTTGTCATGC
Tdest21 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGGTCCATCCATTCTCACTCCAAAG (AG)13 60 231–274 LC010293 LC010315
R: GTTTCTTAGCAGACCCTATTTCACAGCATC
Tdest24 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGATACCATACAGCTTTCAGCCAG (AT)15 60 243–267 LC010294 LC010316
R: GTTTCTTGCAGAACAAACGAATCAATGAGAG
Tdest29 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGAAACGACTCTGCTGGATTTCAC (AC)16 60 219–246 LC010295 LC010317
R: GTTTCTTTTCCGCTCTTGATTTTCTCTCC
Tdest35 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGAAGCTATTGACCCTTCTCAGGATAC (CT)15 60 194–230 LC010296 LC010318
R: GTTTCTTCCATGTTGAATTGTTCCCTTTC
Tdest37 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGCCAAGCGACAGAAAACCATTC (ATC)9 60 164–176 LC010297 LC010319
R: GTTTCTTTCAGTCTCTTCCTCCTCCTCCTC
Tdest38 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGTGACCATTCCTCCTCCTCCTC (ACC)9 60 117–134 LC010298 LC010320
R: GTTTCTTCATGTTTGCAGTTGAGAGAAGACC
Tdest39 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGGCAGCACAGGAGAAGAAAGATG (GCT)9 60 153–165 LC010299 LC010321
R: GTTTCTTACAACAGCCACAACGTGTCC
Tdest42 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGCTCCCTATCCCAACACCAACAC (ACC)9 60 226–255 LC010300 LC010322
R: GTTTCTTTGCCTACCTATCCTTCTTCTTCTCC
Tdest43 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGGGTCCAATGCAGGTAATACAAGAAG (CGG)9 60 137–153 LC010301 LC010323
R: GTTTCTTTCCCCGCCAAGATACTCAAC
Tdest44 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGTTTGGTGGTGGAGGTGGTG (GAT)9 60 134–137 LC010302 LC010324
R: GTTTCTTCGCTTATGCCAAGCAGTCATC
Tdest45 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGTGAGGGTGGTGAGACAATTC (GGT)12 60 211–236 LC010303 LC010325
R: GTTTCTTCAAGATTTGGAACTCCTGCAAC
Tdest49 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGGTGCCCTCAAAGTTACAGCAGTC (GAT)10 60 233–248 LC010304 LC010326
R: GTTTCTTGCAATCACCTCATCCTCACTTC
Tdest52 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGTTCAGGAAGGCCAAGGAGAG (GGT)11 60 239–251 LC010305 LC010327
R: GTTTCTTGATCCTCCTGCATCATTTTGTTC
Tdest53 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGCCAAAGCCCTTCCAGTAACATC (CTT)13 60 244–284 LC010306 LC010328
R: GTTTCTTGATGGAATGAGTGAATCTCAGGAAC
Tdest54 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGCCCTGTATTATTCTCAACATCATCG (CTT)11 60 182–203 LC010307 LC010329
R: GTTTCTTGGGATTCAGACAAGGGCAAG
Tdest56 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGCATTGCCCTTTGGAATATAGGATC (AAG)9 60 153–165 LC010308 LC010330
R: GTTTCTTGTTGCCCATCTGCTCTTCTTC
Tdest58 F: GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGCTGAACGGCGCCCTAATCTC (AAG)13 60 151–180 LC010309 LC010331
R: GTTTCTTGCCCACTCCTCAAATCCAAC
Open in a new tab

Note: DDBJ = DNA Data Bank of Japan; Ta = annealing temperature.

a

1 = T. dolabrata var. hondae.

b

2 = T. dolabrata.

Table 2.

The results of final primer screening on samples from three populations of the genus Thujopsis.

Thujopsis dolabrata var. hondae Thujopsis dolabrata
Okoppe (N = 27) Owani (N = 22) Kiso (N = 32)
Locus A Ho He PID r A Ho He PID r A Ho He PID r Total A
Tdest1 12 1.000 0.897 0.026 −0.066 11 0.955 0.883 0.034 −0.052 12 0.938 0.898 0.024 −0.030 16
Tdest3 6 0.444 0.484 0.305 −0.002 2 0.409 0.333 0.508 −0.113 9 0.813 0.830 0.056 −0.001 10
Tdest11 12 0.963 0.860 0.040 −0.071 9 0.682 0.809 0.070 0.086 9 0.719 0.810 0.069 0.056 14
Tdest14 11 0.852 0.885 0.031 0.009 12 0.864 0.884 0.032 0.001 11 0.875 0.880 0.032 −0.005 14
Tdest17 8 0.778 0.747 0.102 −0.028 8 0.545 0.678 0.152 0.100 7 0.625 0.579 0.229 −0.073 8
Tdest21 17 0.852 0.903 0.023 0.023 11 0.818 0.770 0.080 −0.060 15 0.969 0.926 0.015 −0.031 21
Tdest24 8 0.852 0.832 0.058 −0.024 9 0.727 0.846 0.050 0.064 6 0.719 0.740 0.116 0.008 10
Tdest29 5 0.593 0.622 0.193 0.013 5 0.545 0.540 0.278 −0.008 1 0.000 0.000 1.000 ND 6
Tdest35 17 0.852 0.922 0.016 0.035 15 0.909 0.900 0.025 −0.024 13 0.813 0.850 0.044 0.010 23
Tdest37 4 0.333 0.372 0.438 0.062 4 0.409 0.411 0.398 −0.029 3 0.281 0.294 0.539 0.009 5
Tdest38 3 0.593 0.639 0.215 0.015 5 0.727 0.743 0.125 −0.001 4 0.625 0.615 0.234 −0.016 6
Tdest39 4 0.815 0.613 0.226 −0.159 3 0.682 0.654 0.206 −0.027 2 0.125 0.119 0.786 −0.023 4
Tdest42 6 0.519 0.558 0.277 0.011 5 0.636 0.630 0.210 −0.030 7 0.563 0.652 0.173 0.053 10
Tdest43 6 0.778 0.806 0.077 0.011 8 0.909 0.768 0.097 −0.100 4 0.406 0.455 0.342 0.080 8
Tdest44 1 0.000 0.000 1.000 ND 1 0.000 0.000 1.000 ND 2 0.031 0.031 0.940 −0.002 2
Tdest45 7 0.704 0.643 0.206 −0.058 4 0.545 0.579 0.249 0.024 2 0.094 0.091 0.833 −0.015 7
Tdest49 2 0.148 0.140 0.754 −0.030 3 0.091 0.090 0.834 −0.014 4 0.563 0.495 0.319 −0.082 5
Tdest52 2 0.926 0.507 0.376 −0.301 2 1.000 0.512 0.375 −0.333 2 0.281 0.246 0.604 −0.072 2
Tdest53 12 0.926 0.897 0.025 −0.025 10 0.818 0.885 0.033 0.030 9 0.719 0.783 0.080 0.039 14
Tdest54 3 0.370 0.545 0.325 0.169 3 0.455 0.563 0.274 0.078 4 0.094 0.632 0.212 0.743 5
Tdest56 3 0.778 0.645 0.212 −0.104 4 0.500 0.506 0.293 −0.014 4 0.531 0.563 0.257 0.018 4
Tdest58 5 0.519 0.524 0.320 −0.005 5 0.364 0.499 0.307 0.129 3 0.281 0.298 0.528 0.011 9
Open in a new tab

Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; N = sample size; ND = not determined; PID = probability of identity; r = null allele frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we developed 22 EST-SSR markers for the two varieties of Thujopsis, using expressed sequence data of T. dolabrata var. hondae. These markers have two advantages: high ability to detect genetic polymorphisms in Thujopsis varieties, and a low null allele frequency. Accordingly, these EST-SSR markers will be valuable tools for investigating the genetic diversity and population structure of the genus Thujopsis. Moreover, these markers will help to advance breeding programs for species in the genus Thujopsis.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Blacket M. J., Robin C., Good R. T., Lee S. F., Miller A. D. 2012. Universal primers for fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments—An efficient and cost-effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence. Molecular Ecology Resources 12: 456–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brownstein M. J., Carpten J. D., Smith J. R. 1996. Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: Primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. BioTechniques 20: 1004–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang S., Puryear J., Cairney J. 1993. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 11: 113–116. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fageria M. S., Rajora O. P. 2013. Effects of harvesting of increasing intensities on genetic diversity and population structure of white spruce. Evolutionary Applications 6: 778–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faircloth B. C. 2008. MSATCOMMANDER: Detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 92–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayashi Y. 1960. Taxonomical and phytogeographical study of Japanese conifers. Norin-Shuppan, Tokyo, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  7. Higuchi Y., Matsumoto A., Moriguchi Y., Mishima K., Tanaka K., Yada Y., Takata K., et al. 2012. Genetic diversity and structure using microsatellite markers in natural and breeding populations of Thujopsis dolabrata var. hondae. Journal of the Japanese Forest Society 94: 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  8. Inamori Y., Morita Y., Sakagami Y., Okabe T., Ishida N. 2006. The excellence of Aomori Hiba (Hinokiasunaro) in its use as building materials of Buddhist temples and Shinto shrines. Biocontrol Science 11: 49–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalinowski S. T., Taper M. L., Marshall T. C. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16: 1099–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mishima K., Hirao T., Watanabe A., Takata K. 2012. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Thujopsis dolabrata var. hondai (Cupressaceae). American Journal of Botany 99: e317–e319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray M. G., Thompson W. F. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 8: 4321–4325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peakall R., Smouse P. E. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 2537–2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pittermann J., Stuart S. A., Dawson T. E., Moreau A. 2012. Cenozoic climate change shaped the evolutionary ecophysiology of the Cupressaceae conifers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 9647–9652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rozen S., Skaletsky H. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schulz M. H., Zerbino D. R., Vingron M., Birney E. 2012. Oases: Robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 1086–1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Uchiyama K., Fujii S., Ishizuka W., Goto S., Tsumura Y. 2013. Development of 32 EST-SSR markers for Abies firma (Pinaceae) and their transferability to related species. Applications in Plant Sciences 1(2): 1200464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zerbino D. R., McEwen G. K., Margulies E. H., Birney E. 2009. Pebble and rock band: Heuristic resolution of repeats and scaffolding in the Velvet short-read de novo assembler. PLoS ONE 4: e8407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES