Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1973 Feb;70(2):390–394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.2.390

Effect of Stimulation of the Host Defense System by Coenzyme Q10 on Dibenzpyrene-Induced Tumors and Infection with Friend Leukemia Virus in Mice*

Emile G Bliznakov 1
PMCID: PMC433266  PMID: 4510283

Abstract

Members of the coenzyme Q group increase the phagocytic activity in rats, as measured by the carbon clearance technique, and increase the hemolytic antibody formation in mice. In addition, prior treatment with low doses of chloroquine hydrochloride combined with coenzyme Q10 results in increased numbers of survivors, prolonged survival time, and reduced parasitemia in blood-transferred Plasmodium berghei infection in mice

In an extension of these studies, using emulsions of coenzyme Q10, I demonstrated the following effects on two tumor systems in mice: (i) Treatment with coenzyme Q10 decreased splenomegaly and hepatomegaly and increased the number of surviving mice infected with Friend leukemia virus. (ii) Treatment with coenzyme Q10 reduced the percentage of mice with tumors, increased the number of survivors, and reduced the tumor size in mice with tumors induced by 3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene. The effect on both tumor systems was dose-dependent. These studies support the hypothesis that the host defense system plays a definitive role in the defense of the host against invasion by various agents, including neoplasia.

Keywords: neoplasia, reticuloendothelial system

Full text

PDF
390

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRADNER W. T., CLARKE D. A., STOCK C. C. Stimulation of host defense against experimental cancer. I. Zymosan and sarcoma 180 in mice. Cancer Res. 1958 Apr;18(3):347–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biozzi G., Stiffel C., Mouton D., Bouthillier Y., Decreusefond C. Importance de l'immunité spécifique et non spécifique dans la défense antitumorale. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1972 Apr;122(4):685–694. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bliznakov E. G., Adler A. D. Nonlinear response of the reticuloendothelial system upon stimulation. Pathol Microbiol (Basel) 1972;38(6):393–410. doi: 10.1159/000162456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bliznakov E. G. Effect of reticuloendothelial system stimulation on resistance to Rous sarcoma virus infection in chicks. Int J Cancer. 1968 May 15;3(3):336–343. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910030303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bliznakov E., Casey A., Premuzic E. Coenzymes Q: stimulants of the phagocytic activity in rats and immune response in mice. Experientia. 1970 Sep 26;26(9):953–954. doi: 10.1007/BF02114125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Casey A. C., Bliznakov E. G. Effect and structure-activity relationship of the coenzymes Q on the phagocytic rate of rats. Chem Biol Interact. 1972 Jun;5(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(72)90042-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GALE P. H., ERICKSON R. E., PAGE A. C., Jr, FOLKERS K. COENZYME Q. LI. NEW DATA ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF COENZYME Q IN NATURE. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1964 Jan;104:169–172. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(64)80051-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GHOSE T. Effect of the blockade of reticulo-endothelial system on tumor growth and metastasis; with a short review of literature. Indian J Med Sci. 1957 Nov;11(11):900–909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HELLER J. H., PASTERNAK V. Z., RANSOM J. P., HELLER M. S. A NEW RETICULOENDOTHELIAL SYSTEM STIMULATING AGENT ('RESTIM') FROM SHARK LIVERS. Nature. 1963 Aug 31;199:904–905. doi: 10.1038/199904a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KONDO T., MOORE G. E. Production of metastases by treatment with carcinostatic agents. I. Effects of carcinostatic agents on the host. Cancer Res. 1961 Nov;21:1396–1399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koldovsky P. Dangers and limitations of the immunological treatment of cancer. Lancet. 1966 Mar 19;1(7438):654–655. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)90845-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lemperle G. Effect of RES stimulation on endotoxin shock in mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966 Aug-Sep;122(4):1012–1015. doi: 10.3181/00379727-122-31312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lemperle G. Stimulation of the reticuloendothelial system in burned rats infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect Dis. 1967 Feb;117(1):7–14. doi: 10.1093/infdis/117.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Magarey C. J., Baum M. Oestrogen as a reticuloendothelial stimulant in patients with cancer. Br Med J. 1971 May 15;2(5758):367–370. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5758.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nazir D. J., Magar N. G. Determination of ubiquinone and tocopherol in some tissues of shark (Carcharias ellioti day). Biochem J. 1964 Feb;90(2):268–270. doi: 10.1042/bj0900268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. OLD L. J., BENACERRAF B., CLARKE D. A., CARSWELL E. A., STOCKERT E. The role of the reticuloendothelial system in the host reaction to neoplasia. Cancer Res. 1961 Oct;21:1281–1300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. OLD L. J., CLARKE D. A., BENACERRAF B. Effect of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin infection on transplanted tumours in the mouse. Nature. 1959 Jul 25;184(Suppl 5):291–292. doi: 10.1038/184291a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. OMORI Y. THE RELATION BETWEEN THE RETICULOENDOTHELIAL SYSTEM AND THE SPREAD OF CANCER, ESPECIALLY OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1964 Jan 25;81:315–321. doi: 10.1620/tjem.81.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PELNER L. HOST-TUMOR ANTAGONISM. 33. CANCER IMMUNITY--A REVIEW AND AN ANALYSIS OF SOME FACTORS IN HOST RESISTANCE TO CANCER. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1963 Sep;11:843–883. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1963.tb03956.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. PELNER L. Host-tumor antagonism. IX. The reticulo-endothelial system and neoplasia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1957 Nov;5(11):916–931. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1957.tb00491.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. RANSOM J. P., BLIZNAKOV E., PASTERNAK V. Z., HELLER J. H. [Action of agents stimulating the reticuloendothelial system on the resistance of chick embryos bearing an adult spleen graft]. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1962;156:1022–1024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. ROWE W. P., BRODSKY I. A graded-response assay for the Friend leukemia virus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Dec;23:1239–1248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Redfearn E. R. Mode of action of ubiquinones (coenzymes Q) in electron transport systems. Vitam Horm. 1966;24:465–488. doi: 10.1016/s0083-6729(08)60217-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rosenau W., Moon H. D. Suppression of the immune response to antigenic tumors in isogenic mice by whole-body irradiation. Cancer Res. 1967 Nov;27(11):1973–1981. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. SOUTHAM C. M. Applications of immunology to clinical cancer. Past attempts and future possibilities. Cancer Res. 1961 Oct;21:1302–1316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Woodruff M. F., Boak J. L. Inhibitory effect of injection of Corynebacterium parvum on the growth of tumour transplants in isogenic hosts. Br J Cancer. 1966 Jun;20(2):345–355. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1966.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yamaguchi I., Takahashi T., Narisawa T., Hiroki T. An experimental study on the effect of reticuloendothelial activity on metastasis and recurrence of tumor. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1965 Dec 25;87(3):338–350. doi: 10.1620/tjem.87.338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yashphe D. J. Immunological factors in nonspecific stimulation of host resistance to syngeneic tumors. A review. Isr J Med Sci. 1971 Jan;7(1):90–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES