Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1973 Mar;70(3):710–713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.710

The “Trophic” Value of Foods

Roger J Williams 1,2, James D Heffley 1,2, Man-Li Yew 1,2, Charles W Bode 1,2
PMCID: PMC433341  PMID: 4514984

Abstract

Foods must furnish (i) calories, which can readily be measured, and (ii) raw materials necessary for the building and maintenance of metabolic machinery which makes possible fuel utilization. We have called this “beyond-calorie” quality of food its “trophic” value.

This concept has more unity than appears on the surface, and is capable of approximate measurement by biological testing as our experiments show.

The trophic value of a food cannot be ascertained from food composition tables because only a smattering of the necessary information is commonly furnished. A food cannot support life if it is missing, or deficient with respect to, any one of the necessary nutrients. A tabulation which includes only a few nutrients—e.g., calcium, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, phosphorus, and iron—can be woefully misleading, especially if these individual nutrients have been added by way of fortification.

The measurement we have applied to a number of foods is potentially valuable for comparing similar food products: two grains, two breads, two milk products, or for comparison of the same food grown, processed, or preserved in different ways. By using essentially this method we have found that barnyard eggs are somewhat superior to battery eggs, but that whether they are fertile or infertile makes no difference.

We are of the opinion that extensive biological testing of many commercial food products is highly desirable to help promote human health and better internal environments for our cells and tissues.

Keywords: nutrition, rats, diet, comparative value, 9- or 12-week test

Full text

PDF
710

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HEGSTED D. M., CHANG Y. O. PROTEIN UTILIZATION IN GROWING RATS. I. RELATIVE GROWTH INDEX AS A BIOASSAY PROCEDURE. J Nutr. 1965 Feb;85:159–168. doi: 10.1093/jn/85.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Williams R. J., Heffley J. D., Bode C. W. The nutritive value of single foods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Oct;68(10):2361–2364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.10.2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES