Abstract
The Schwann cell (SC)-axon interface represents a membrane specialization that integrates axonal signals to coordinate cytoskeletal dynamics resulting in myelination. Here we show that LKB1/Par-4 is asymmetrically localized to the SC-axon interface and colocalizes with the polarity protein Par-3. Using purified SCs and myelinating cocultures, we demonstrate that localization is dependent on the phosphorylation of LKB1 at serine-431. SC-specific deletion of LKB1 significantly attenuates developmental myelination, delaying the initiation and altering the myelin extent into adulthood, resulting in a 30% reduction in the conduction velocity along adult sciatic nerves. Phosphorylation of LKB1 by protein kinase A is essential to establish the asymmetric localization of LKB1 and Par-3 and rescues the delay in myelination observed in the SC-specific knockout of LKB1. Our findings suggest that SC polarity may coordinate multiple signaling complexes that couple SC-axon contact to the redistribution of specific membrane components necessary to initiate and control myelin extent.
INTRODUCTION
Cell polarity is critical for various cellular processes including establishing the antero-posterior axis, generating distinct membrane specializations (apical and basal polarity), as well as asymmetric cell division and axon specification. Essentially, cell polarity plays fundamental roles to help organize and integrate complex molecular signals for cells to function properly and make decisions concerning fate and differentiation. One such group of factors, the partitioning defective (Par) proteins, is essential in mediating cell polarity through the formation of a molecular complex1, 2. While the Par proteins were first identified in C. elegans3, they are remarkably conserved across various model organisms and cell types, implicating these proteins in a unique intrinsic program that directs specified function in highly dynamic environments. The role of the Par complex in establishing cellular asymmetry is largely conserved in various cellular processes. However, the precise mechanisms may differ based on the cell-context specificity for adaptor proteins and the specific activation of downstream signaling pathways. Since the tumor suppressor protein LKB1/Par-4 mutations are epistatic to other Par protein functions, we propose that LKB1 may be the central regulator of cellular asymmetry in the SC4, 5. Underlying this rationale are two specific findings: 1. The discovery for the role of Par-3 in the formation of a unique membrane specialization in the SC, similar to that observed in the apical polarity of epithelial cells6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 2. The polarity proteins Pals1 and Dlg can modulate the extent of the myelin sheath (wraps of myelin) formed by SCs11, 12.
While much has been learned concerning the mechanisms and molecules responsible for the maintenance and stabilization of cell polarity, relatively little is known about the extrinsic cues that initiate asymmetry. In Figure 1a, we illustrate the conservation and multifaceted roles for the Par polarity proteins during SC development that may facilitate the integration of multiple signaling pathways. The Par complex is asymmetrically localized to the site of the SC-axon interface13, 8 and may be recruited by various adhesion molecules, such as N-cadherin, Necl4, and/or the integrins7, 13, 14, 15, 16, as well as growth factor receptors6, 8. Additionally, the Par complex may reciprocally recruit growth factor receptors and/or adhesion molecules to initiate localized signaling cascades. The Par proteins can activate the Rho-family of small GTPases to alter actin dynamics, important for the ensheathment and sorting of individual axons17, 18, 19, 20. It is well established that the Par proteins can interact with various adaptor-like proteins that associate with and/or control the orientation and positioning of microtubules, essential for directed elongation and membrane spreading21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32. Finally, the Par complex can activate signaling pathways to influence cytoskeletal rearrangement as well as gene expression to promote the initiation and extent of myelination11, 12, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 (Figure 1a). To date six Par genes have been cloned and characterized and Par-1 and Par-4 (also known as LKB1) are the only family members that encode serine-threonine kinases. As a multitude of extrinsic signals have been previously identified to converge on LKB1, combined with the fact that LKB1 can activate Par-1 via phosphorylation, we hypothesize that LKB1 may act as a central regulator to establish cellular asymmetry in the SC1, 4, 42.
Here we demonstrate that LKB1 is asymmetrically localized to the SC-axon interface and colocalizes with the polarity protein Par-3. We find that the localization of LKB1 is dependent on phosphorylation at ser-431 and correlates with the expression of myelin-specific proteins. By generating a SC-specific knockout of LKB1, the asymmetric localization of Par-3 is disrupted and developmental myelination is significantly attenuated without altering SC proliferation or alignment. We demonstrate that the cAMP dependent phosphorylation of LKB1 in SCs by PKA is necessary to establish the asymmetric localization of LKB1 and Par-3 and is capable of rescuing the hypomyelination phenotype observed in the SC-specific deletion of LKB1. Together these findings illustrate the fascinating redundancy and conservation of the molecular mechanisms involved in the establishment of cellular asymmetry and provide valuable insight into the mechanisms surrounding the initiation of membrane wrapping and extent of the myelin sheath.
RESULTS
The asymmetric localization of LKB1 to the SC-axon interface
What are the initial steps that break symmetry within a cell and what insight does this understanding provide for SC myelination? Evidence for the role of LKB1 in the generation of cellular asymmetry in the SC requires two key components: 1. The localization of LKB1 should most likely be polarized (asymmetrically distributed) and 2. The localization of LKB1 should be intimately associated with activation. LKB1 contains a number of residues that are either autophosphorylated or phosphorylated by upstream kinases (ser-31, ser-325, thr-366 and ser-431). These sites are highly conserved in drospophila, xenopus, and mammalian cells4, 42. However, only ser-431 alters the cellular localization of LKB143, 44. Therefore, we examined the expression and phosphorylation of LKB1 during development in purified SC-DRG cocultures13. Consistent with our hypothesis, the localization of LKB1 is dependent on the phosphorylation of ser-431. While LKB1 is enriched at the SC-axon interface, it is diffusely localized throughout the SC body and SC processes (Figure 1b), phosphorylated LKB1 is asymmetrically localized to the SC-axon interface (Figure 1c) and colocalizes with Par-3 (Figure 1d), similar to our previous observations with N-cadherin and β-catenin8, 13. Additionally, phosphorylation at ser-431 of LKB1 correlates with the induction of SC myelination by the addition of ascorbic acid and precedes the expression of the myelin protein P0 (Figure 1e, asterisks).
To examine the potential role of LKB1 during SC development in vitro, we initially established SC-DRG cocultures from the floxed LKB1 mice and transduced Cre-recombinase with GFP into SCs using retrovirus. As the retroviral vectors infect only actively dividing cells, this system ensures that SCs are specifically infected whereas the DRG neurons remain uninfected. Knockdown of the LKB1 was confirmed in the SCs by immunostaining for LKB1 (Figure 1f). Additionally, deletion of LKB1 disrupted the asymmetric localization of Par-3 suggesting that LKB1 is necessary for the redistribution of Par-3 to the SC-axon interface (Figure 1g). As proliferation and alignment of SCs in the cocultures are unaffected by deletion of LKB1, we sought to examine the role of LKB1 on the initiation of myelination. Therefore, we generated the SC-specific deletion of LKB1 by crossing the floxed LKB1 mice with the CNP-Cre mice. In these mice, the cre-recombinase is under the control of the CNP gene regulatory sequences and is expressed in SCs from E1217. Upon establishing the SC-DRG cocultures, we quickly observed a significant decrease in the number of myelin internodes from the SC-specific KO cultures as compared to the WT controls (Figure 1h). Western analyses illustrate the deletion of LKB1 from the SC-DRG cocultures (Figure 1i). While the expression of the myelin protein P0 is significantly attenuated in the knockout SC-DRG cocultures, we detect a concomitant increase in the expression of the transcription factor Oct-6, suggesting that the LKB1 KO SCs are held in a more immature state (Figure 1i).
SC-specific knockout of LKB1 delays initiation and alters myelin extent
To investigate the role of LKB1 during the development of the peripheral nervous system in vivo, we analyzed WT and the LKB1 SC-specific KO mice at different times during postnatal development. While the mice are slightly smaller than littermate controls (Figure 2a), the sciatic nerve at 7 days postnatal display a severe hypomyelination phenotype, as the nerve is translucent and significantly thinner (Figure 2b). To confirm that LKB1 is indeed deleted, we immunostained sciatic nerve sections for LKB1 and observed a considerable decrease in LKB1 expression in the SCs as compared to littermate controls (Figure 2d). Sciatic nerves from WT littermates and the LKB1 SC-specific KO mice at postnatal day 7, 14 and 60 were collected, stained with luxol fast blue and analyzed by light microscopy. At postnatal day 7 and 14, it is evident that the initiation of myelination is significantly delayed and that myelin extent is diminished (Figure 2c). However, after waiting for an additional two months postnatal, the LKB1 SC-specific KO mice display many more myelinated axons, but the myelin extent appears to remain decreased as compared to littermate controls (Figure 2c), suggesting that both initiation and myelin extent are altered. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that cell polarity may regulate initiation of myelination via cytoskeletal rearrangement and additionally control the myelin extent by modulating signal transduction pathways and gene expression (Figure 1a). Western analysis of the sciatic nerves from three littermate WT and three SC-specific KO mice at postnatal day 14 were performed (Figure 2e). Similar to immunostaining, LKB1 expression is clearly diminished in the SC-specific KO nerves. Oct-6 expression is elevated in the KO nerves and P0 is greatly attenuated. These findings are consistent with our in vitro results and suggest an important role for LKB1 in the maturation of the SC and the initiation of myelination.
After the second postnatal week nerve sections were immunostained for Krox20, a transcription factor expressed specifically in myelinating SCs, as well as Oct6 and Sox2, transcription factors expressed in premyelinating and non-myelinating SCs (Figure 3a–e). Krox20 expression is robust in the myelinating SCs of the WT nerves and is significantly attenuated in the SC-specific KO nerves (Figure 3e). Whereas Oct6 and Sox2 expression is elevated in the SC-specific KO nerves as compared to WT controls (Figure 3e). The quantification of the p14 nerves suggest that the LKB1 KO SCs are held in an immature state resulting in the delayed expression of Krox20. It is important to note that the total number of SCs is unchanged along the sciatic nerves from the WT and SC-specific KO mice. Sciatic nerves were also immunostained with S100β (green) and myelin basic protein (MBP; red) to examine potential effects on SC numbers and myelination (Figure 3g–j). Myelin internodes are greatly diminished in the SC-specific KO nerves as compared to WT controls (Figure 3f–h), consistent with the luxol fast blue staining (Figure 2c). Additionally, the number of SCs is essentially unchanged upon quantification of S100β immunostaining (Figure 3f). Upon examination of SCs stained with S100β it is evident that the SCs are elongating along the axons and similar in morphology to the WT SCs (Figure 3i, j). Electron micrographs from the sciatic nerves were also examined and found to be consistent with the previous findings, that deletion of LKB1 in SCs significantly attenuates developmental myelination, delaying the initiation and altering the myelin extent into adulthood (Figure 4a). Examination of micrographs at postnatal day 14 resulted in the identification of numerous unmyelinated axons that were not yet sorted by individual SCs (Figure 4b), similar to observations in the Rac1 knockout mice17, 18. Quantification of the number of myelinated axons from the sciatic nerves, displays a significant decrease at postnatal day 7 and 14, but this difference is no longer apparent at 2 months of age (Figure 4c). From both light and electron microscopy, it is evident that myelin extent is greatly diminished in the LKB1 SC-specific KO nerves even at two months postnatal. This is clearly evident when comparing the myelin from similar sized axons from WT and LKB1 SC-specific KO nerves (Figure 4d). G-ratios display an overall increase in the SC-specific KO nerves, indicative of a decrease in the extent of myelin thickness at day 60 postnatal. These findings clearly indicate that the myelin extent from the SC-specific KO nerves remains thinner even in adulthood and does not simply represent a delay in onset of myelination (Figure 4e, Supplementary Figure 1). Together, these results suggest that LKB1 in SCs is an essential regulator for the timely initiation of myelination and controls the extent of myelination into adulthood.
SC-specific knockout of LKB1 attenuates conduction velocity of sciatic nerves
As deletion of LKB1 from SCs results in significantly thinner myelin extent, we hypothesize that thinner myelin would result in increased membrane capacitance and lead to functional deficits reflected by delayed conduction velocity measurements. Therefore, we measured compound action potentials (CAPs) in isolated sciatic nerves. Consistent with our hypothesis the SC-specific KO sciatic nerves displayed a 30.8% reduction in the conduction velocity, as compared to wild-type littermates (WT: 11.8 ± 0.92 m/s vs. cKO: 8.2 ± 0.66 m/s) (Fig. 5a, b). The threshold stimulus for maximal CAP responses was measured and found to be similar between both genotypes (WT: 0.53 ± 0.087 mA vs. cKO: 0.56 ± 0.075 mA) (Fig. 5c). Additionally, we performed paired stimulation experiments to examine whether the SC-specific knockout of LKB1 alters the refractory period of the nerves. The refractory periods between genotypes were not significantly altered (Fig. 5d–e). These findings suggest that the increase in membrane capacitance as a result of the thinner myelin in the KO mice, results in the attenuation in the propagation of the action potential. Together these findings demonstrate that the long-term consequence of decreased myelin extent can be detected by electrophysiological analysis and may result in functional deficits in physiology and behavior of the SC-specific LKB1 KO mice.
Phosphorylation of LKB1 by PKA regulates localization and initiation of myelination
Our data indicate that the asymmetric localization of LKB1 may be dependent on the phosphorylation of ser-431 of LKB1 (Figure 1c–e). Analysis of the expression of phosphorylated ser-431 of LKB1 during normal sciatic nerve development indicates that phosphorylation precedes the expression of the myelin proteins P0 and MBP and correlates with the down-regulation of Oct-6 (Figure 6a; asterisks). In order to determine the upstream kinase involved in the phosphorylation of LKB1, we decided to examine the role of protein kinase A (PKA). Previous findings clearly demonstrate that ser431 of LKB1 is an evolutionary conserved PKA phosphorylation site across multiple species4, 42, 45, 46. As PKA may be activated by cAMP and is essential for SC development47, 48, 49 we initially set out to determine whether phosphorylation of LKB1 is dependent on cAMP. SCs were purified and cultured in increasing concentrations (2–10 µM) of forskolin for 48 hours to elevate cAMP, as well as the growth factors BDNF or neureguilin-1 (NRG-1) (Figure 6b). Phosphorylation of ser-431 of LKB1 was induced upon addition of forskolin at all concentrations tested as well as BDNF and NRG-1 (Figure 6b). To confirm that PKA controls SC development and myelination via phosphorylation of LKB1, we expressed a dominant negative (DN) form of PKA by targeting the alpha-1 catalytic subunit (Figure 6c). Expression of the DN-PKA in SCs using a retroviral vector abolishes the expression and asymmetric localization of phosphorylated ser-431 of LKB1 in SCs (Figure 6d, e). Additionally, expression of the DN-PKA in SC-DRG cocultures significantly inhibits myelination by SCs, consistent with previous findings that suggest an essential role for PKA in SC myelination47 (Figure 6f–i). These results suggest that phosphorylation of LKB1 at ser-431 is dependent on cAMP/PKA signaling and function.
Phosphorylation of LKB1 is essential for localization and rescues myelination
Finally, to determine whether phosphorylation of LKB1 is necessary and sufficient for SC function, we expressed WT LKB1 and the phosphorylation serine-431-alanine (S431A) mutant LKB1 into the LKB1 null SC background. SCs from the LKB1 SC-specific KO mice were cocultured with DRG neurons and transduced with either the full length WT or S431A LKB1 (Figure 7a). WT LKB1 correctly localizes to the SC-axon interface and is properly phosphorylated at ser-431, while the S431A mutant LKB1 is diffusely expressed and phosphorylation is essentially undetectable (Figure 7b, c). Additionally, WT LKB1 colocalizes with Par-3 at the SC-axon interface, while the S431A mutant abolishes the asymmetric localization of Par-3, suggesting that phosphorylation of LKB1 at ser-431 is essential for the redistribution of Par-3 (Figure 7d). Western analysis of the cocultures demonstrates that forced expression of WT LKB1 in the null background is sufficient to rescue P0 expression and the concomitant down-regulation of Oct-6 (Figure 7e, f), suggesting that LKB1 is required for the maturation of the SC. Alternatively, forced expression of the S431A LKB1 does not rescue the expression of P0 or the down-regulation of Oct-6, suggesting that phosphorylation of ser431 of LKB1 is essential for the progression of premyelinating SCs into promyelinating SCs (Figure 7e, f). SCs in a LKB1 null background were infected with WT, S431A and S431D LKB1 (phosphomimetic, Figure 7g) and were examined in cocultures. Quantification of the myelin internodes formed in the cocultures indicates that WT and S431D LKB1 rescue the hypomyelination phenotype by approximately three-fold over the S431A mutant LKB1 (Figure 7h–k). SC myelin internodes expressing the WT and S431D LKB1 are identified by the coexpression of GFP, while the S431A mutant LKB1 is rarely expressed in SCs actively making myelin internodes, albeit diminished in the LKB1 null background (Figure 7h–k). These findings suggest that phosphorylation of LKB1 at S431 is essential to promote the timely initiation of myelination in vitro. However, to examine both necessity and sufficiency of phosphorylation of LKB1 by PKA during SC development, we co-transduced the DN-PKA construct and the S431D LKB1 into SCs in the LKB1 null background (Figure 7l). Once again, the expression of the DN-PKA in SC-DRG co-cultures significantly inhibits myelination by SCs. While the expression of the WT or S431D phosphomimetic LKB1 significantly rescues the myelination phenotype in the LKB1 null SCs (Figure 7m, n), neither was sufficient to rescue myelination in the presence of the DN-PKA (Figure 7o). These findings suggest that PKA function is dominant over LKB1 and that the additional function(s) of PKA contribute to the timely initiation of myelination, including but not limited to the phosphorylation of LKB1.
DISCUSSION
Myelination is a unique example of cell-cell interaction, whereby the SC wraps multiple layers of its own membrane around an axon to maximize the efficiency of the functioning neuron. How is this process initiated and how is myelination spatially and temporally regulated? Interestingly, there is remarkable redundancy in the function of Par proteins and various adhesion molecules that mediate numerous cellular processes. The Par proteins are undoubtedly key players in mediating cell polarity, altering cytoskeletal dynamics, morphology, and localizing signaling cascades essential for myelination. However, the lingering question is: how is SC polarity initially established? A requisite component for SC development and myelination is axonal contact and axon-derived signals, such as NRG1 type III35, 36. Herein we find a paradoxical interaction, which links the intrinsic cellular mechanisms that establish cell polarity to extrinsic signals, and transduction of extrinsic signals to illicit specific function depends on the intrinsic nature of the cell. While there are still many questions remaining, our findings begin to illustrate how the intrinsic mechanism of SC polarity may transduce extrinsic signals into the initiation of myelination by the formation of a novel membrane specialization similar to the apical membrane domain of epithelial cells.
We demonstrate that the polarity protein LKB1 may be the central regulator of cellular asymmetry in the SC, to initiate myelination and control the proper extent. Our data illustrate that LKB1 is asymmetrically localized to the SC-axon interface and controls the redistribution of the polarity protein Par-3. The localization of LKB1 is dependent on phosphorylation at ser-431 by PKA and that this event is necessary to rescue the hypomyelination phenotype observed in the SC-specific deletion of LKB1. Our findings begin to couple the mechanisms surrounding the initiation of membrane wrapping with the proper extent of the myelin sheath. While these processes are thought to be mutually exclusive, the finding that Par-3 is essential for the proper initiation of myelination6, 7, 8, 9, 10, combined with data demonstrating that Pals1 and Dlg modulate the thickness of myelin sheath11, 12, suggest that a single molecule, namely LKB1, may facilitate the integration of multiple signaling pathways. Previous findings concerning axon-derived NRG1 type III and the activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 as important regulators of myelin extent suggests that initiation of cellular asymmetry may result in a convergence of pathways that result in myelination. Additionally, sustained activation of ERK1/2 MAPK enhances myelin extent in SCs and oligodendrocytes56. It will be fascinating to examine the redundancy and conservation of the molecular mechanisms involved in the establishment of cellular asymmetry and the signaling pathways surrounding the initiation of membrane wrapping and extent of the myelin sheath. It is interesting to note that CNP-Cre mice also target oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Upon further examination, oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination were essentially normal without delay in initiation or change in myelin extent (Supplementary Figure 2).
The SC-axon interface represents a centralized position to provide orientation to the SC and allows it to transduce axonal signals into pathways that promote growth, trafficking, and cytoskeletal rearrangement. While beyond the scope of this manuscript, we hope to one day elucidate the sequence of events and pathways that help to organize the construction and stabilization of this molecular scaffold at the SC-axon interface. Our findings provide us with a rare opportunity to begin to characterize this novel molecular scaffold, essential for the proper initiation and extent of myelination. Investigating the role of cell polarity during SC development should provide valuable insight into our understanding of the coordination of cytoskeletal dynamics, membrane trafficking and gene expression for the initiation, growth and maintenance of myelination.
ONLINE METHODS
Generation of SC-specific LKB1 knockout mice and genotyping
Mice were housed and maintained in the Laboratory Animal Resource Center at University of California, San Francisco in accordance with all Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee requirements. CNP-Cre mice were a gift from (Dr. Klaus Nave) and floxed LKB1 mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. Genomic DNA was isolated from mouse tails and standard PCR reactions were performed with the following primers: LKB1 Forward: 5’- ATCGGAATGTGATCCAGCTT-3’; LKB1 Reverse: 5’-ACGTAGGCTGTGCAACCTCT-3’; three primers for the CNP-Cre PCR reaction: 5’-GCCTTCAAACTGTCCATCTC-3’; 5’- GATGGGGCTTACTCTTGC-3’ and 5’-CATAGCCTGAAGAACGAGA-3’. LKB1 primers amplify a 450bp DNA fragment corresponding to the floxed allele and a 380 bp fragment corresponding to the wild type allele. Three CNP-Cre primers generate a DNA fragment of 894 bp corresponding to the CNP-Cre allele and a 1160 bp fragment for wild type allele.
Primary SC and DRG coculture
Purified DRG and SC cultures were established using methods described previously (Lewallen et al., 2011; Chan et al., 2006). DRGs were removed from E15 rat embryos and placed in a 15-ml conical centrifuge tube with 5 ml of L15 medium + 10% FBS and allowed to settle. The DRGs were washed with 10 ml of L15 medium and replaced with 5 ml of 0.25% trypsin. DRGs were then incubated at 37°C for 45 minutes. Trypsin was removed and DRGs were washed by adding 10 ml of L15 + 10% FBS and centrifuged gently at 1,000 rpm for 10 min. The medium was replaced with 5 ml of DRG medium containing high glucose MEM, 10% FBS and 100 ng/ml NGF. Trituration was performed with a fire-polished Pasteur pipette until the suspension was homogeneous. The dissociated DRGs were plated onto collagen-coated glass coverslips at a volume of 400 ul at a density of 150,000 total cells per 25 mm coverslip. The next day, the wells were flooded with 1 ml of medium containing antimitotic (high glucose MEM, N2 supplement, 100 ng/ml NGF and FdU). After two days, the medium was replaced with 1 ml of DRG medium. The feeding cycle alternating between DRG medium and medium containing antimitotic was then repeated twice. The purified DRG neurons were cultured in DRG medium for an additional week before adding purified SCs.
Two-day old rat pups were used for SC isolation and purification from sciatic nerves. Nerves were placed in L15 + 10% FBS and allowed to settle. The nerves were washed with L15 then incubated at 37°C for 15 min in 3 ml of 3 mg/ml collagenase solution. The collagenase was removed and replaced with fresh 3 ml collagenase solution with 500 ul of 0.25% trypsin for an additional incubation at 37°C for 15 min. The collagenase solution was removed. The nerves were triturated with a fire-polished Pasteur pipette in 5 ml of L15 + 10% FBS until thoroughly teased. The suspension was filtered through a 40 µm cell strainer. The strainer was rinsed with 5 ml L15 + 10% FBS. The suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 15 min and cells were resuspended and cultured in SC medium (DMEM, 10% FBS and penn/strep) on PLL-coated dishes. Cytosine araboniside (AraC) was added the next day at a final concentration of 1 mM. Schwann cells were cultured for 3 more days prior to removal of AraC. The SC medium was replaced every three days and Schwann cells were cultured for an additional week. Approximately 100,000 SCs were seeded onto purified neurons and allowed to proliferate and ensheath the axons for approximately 5–7 days. Myelination was then initiated with the addition of ascorbic acid (50 µg/ml).
Dissociated SC/DRG cocultures explants
Dissociated SC/DRG cocultures were established using methods described previously (Lewallen et al., 2011; Chan et al., 2006). DRGs were isolated from mouse embryos (E13–E14) and washed with L15 medium before incubation in 0.25% trypsin at 37°C for 30 min. Trypsin was removed and DRGs were washed with L15 + 10% FBS and centrifuged gently at 1,000rpm for 10 min. The medium was replaced with DRG medium containing high glucose MEM, 10% FBS and 100ng/ml NGF. The ganglia were triturated with a fire-polished Pasteur pipette until the suspension was homogeneous and the dissociated DRGs were plated onto collagen-coated glass coverslips at a density of approximately 150,000 cells per 25 mm coverslip. The cells were cultured in DRG medium for 5 days before ascorbic acid was added to induce myelination.
Compound Action Potential Recordings
Mice were anesthetized with isofluorane and sciatic nerves were isolated and transferred to oxygenated recording solution (125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM D-glucose, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 25 mM NaHCO3) at room temperature. Both ends of the sciatic nerve were suctioned into separate fire-polished borosilicate glass suction electrodes using 2 mL precision syringes (Gilmont). A transparent adhesive grid slide with 1 mm spacing (Election Microscopy Sciences) was fixed underneath the recording chamber to measure the length of nerves (between suction electrodes). Signals were acquired with a differential AC amplifier (Model 1700, AM Systems) and digitized (Axon Digidata 1440A, Molecular Devices). Constant current stimulation (50 µs) was delivered to the stimulus electrode using a stimulus isolator (ISO-Flex, A.M.P.I.). Oxygenated recording solution was perfused by gravity into the recording chamber, and removed via a peristaltic pump. Compound action potentials (CAPs) were measured at room temperature by delivering current via the stimulus electrode on one end of the nerve, while recording the voltage response at the other end. Conductance velocity was determined by dividing the length of the nerve over the latency between the start of the stimulus artifact and the peak of the CAP. For paired stimulation experiments, the amplitude of the CAP was taken from a baseline immediately prior to the stimulus artifact and measured at the maximum positive voltage deflection during the CAP. Where the amplitude of the 2nd CAP was too small to identify by eye, we measured the amplitude at a latency equal to that of the 1st CAP.
Retroviral vectors
The pCAG-IRES-EGFP-WT LKB1 and the S431A phospho-mutant constructs were obtained from Drs. Mu-ming Poo and Maya Shelly. A NotI restriction site was engineered into 3’ region downstream of the coding sequence of LKB1 by PCR. The PCR products and the retroviral vector pBMN-I-GFP (Addgene) were digested with NotI respectively. The digested PCR products were ligated into the viral vector and the constructs (pBMN-WT-LKB1-GFP and pBMN-S431A-LKB1-GFP) were confirmed by sequencing. pCAG-Cre and pBMN-I-GFP were digested with both EcoRI and NotI respectively. The Cre fragment from pCAG-Cre was then ligated into the retro viral vector (pBMN-Cre-GFP). Retroviral production was achieved by transfecting Phoenix cells as previous described (Lewallen et al., 2011). Viral supernatant was harvested 48–72 h post-transfection and centrifuged to remove cellular debris. The retroviral supernatants were prepared in MEM medium containing 10% FBS and NGF and added to cocultures.
Western Analysis
Samples from cultures and mouse sciatic nerves were prepared for Western blot analysis as previously described (Lewallen et al., 2011). Briefly, samples were dounced in RIPA buffer containing: 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3V04, 2.5 mM NaF, Complete protease inhibitor (Roche), 1% NP-40, 0.5 % Na deoxycholic acid, 1 mM PMSF and 0.1% SDS for Western analysis. Electrophoretic separation of the samples and the extracts was performed on 10% SDS polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and probed with specific antibodies. Antibodies for Western blot analysis: rat monoclonal anti-MBP (Millipore), mouse monoclonal anti-P0 (Astexx), mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (Sigma), rabbit polyclonal anti-Oct-6 (provided by Dr. Dies Meijer), rabbit polyclonal anti-Oct-6 (provided by Dr. Dies Meijer), mouse monoclonal anti-LKB1 (Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-p-LKB1 (Santa Cruz), rabbit polyclonal anti-p75NTR (Promega). The Alexa Fluor goat antirabbit, anti-mouse, and anti-rat 680 IgG antibodies (Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies for near-infrared fluorescent detection performed on the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR). Full Western blots from all the figures are displayed in Supplementary Figure 3.
Immunostaining
Immunostaining were performed as previously described (Lewallen et al., 2011). Briefly, SC and SC-DRG cocultures were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, and permeabilized and blocked by incubation with 20% goat serum and 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS. Myelin was detected with a rat monoclonal anti-MBP antibody (Millipore, 1:100 dilution). Axons were detected using a rabbit polyclonal anti-neurofilament (NF) antibody (145kDa, medium chain) (Millipore, 1:200 dilution) and a mouse monoclonal anti-NF antibody (Covance, 1:200 dilution). SCs were detected by using a rabbit polyclonal antibody to S100 (Dako, 1:500 dilution), rabbit polyclonal antibodies to Krox20 and Oct6 (provided by Dies Meijer, 1:500 dlution) and a rabbit polyclonal antibody to Sox2 (provided by Samuel Pleasure, 1:100 dilution). Par-3 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal anti-Par-3 antibody (Provided by Dr. Tony Pawson, 1:200 dilution). LKB1 was detected by using a mouse monoclonal anti-LKB1 antibody (Abcam, 1:50 dilution), rabbit polyclonal anti-LKB1 antibody (Abcam, 1:50 dilution), mouse monoclonal anti-phospho-S431-LKB1 antibody (Santa Cruz, 1:50 dilution) and rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-S431-LKB1 antibody (Santa Cruz, 1:50 dilution). P75NTR was detected using a rabbit polyclonal anti-p75NTR antibody (Promega, 1:500 dilution). The Alexa Fluor anti-rat 594, anti-rabbit 488 and 594, and anti-mouse 488 and 594 IgG antibodies (Invitrogen, 1:1000 dilution) were used as secondary antibodies for fluorescence detection. Cell nuclei were stained with mounting medium containing DAPI (Vectashield, Vector Labs). Colocalization was determined by fluorescence microscopy combined with Z-stack acquisition and 3-D reconstruction performed on the Zeiss Apotome.
Histology
Animals were anesthetized and perfused transcardially with PBS briefly, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Sciatic nerves were removed and postfixed in 4% PFA overnight. Nerves were then submerged in 30% sucrose in PBS overnight. 25 µm-thick sections were obtained using a Microtome prior to immunostaining.
Electron microscope analysis
As previously described (Lewallen et al., 2011), sciatic nerves were fixed through perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then submerged in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. All nerves were stained with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at 4°C, and counterstained with 1% uranyl acetate overnight. Nerves were rinsed with distilled water and dehydrated in a series of ethanol dehydration treatments (50%, 70%, 95%, and 100%). Embedding was performed in a 1:1 resin (EMBed-812, Electron Microscopy Services) and propylene oxide (Electron Microscopy Services) mix for 1 h at room temperature, followed by a 2:1 resin:propylene oxide mixture overnight at room temperature. Nerves were then placed in 100% resin for 3 h at room temperature. Ultrathin sections (70nm) were obtained from the Norris Center Cell and Tissue Imaging Core at the University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine and visualized with a JEM1400 Electron Microscope (JEOL) in the Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the Chan laboratory and Dr. Stephen Fancy for support, advice and insightful discussions. We would like to thank Drs. Mu-Ming Poo and Maya Shelly for the full-length LKB1 construct and the phospho-S431A mutant construct, Dr. Klaus Nave for the CNP-Cre mice and Daniel Zollinger for his technical advice on recording CAPs from sciatic nerves. The work was supported by the US National Multiple Sclerosis Harry Weaver Neuroscience Scholar Award (JF2142-A-2) and the NIH/NINDS (R01NS062796) to JRC, and the NIH/NINDS (R01NS072427 and R01NS075243) to QRL.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Goldstein B, Macara IG. The PAR proteins: fundamental players in animal cell polarization. Dev. Cell. 2007;13:609–622. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Munro E, Nance J, Priess JR. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev. Cell. 2004;7:413–424. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rose LS, Kemphues KJ. Early patterning of the C. elegans embryo. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1998;32:521–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jansen M, Ten Klooster JP, Offerhaus GJ, Clevers H. LKB1 and AMPK family signaling: the intimate link between cell polarity and energy metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 2009;89:777–798. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00026.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Katajisto P, Vallenius T, Vaahtomeri K, Ekman N, Udd L, Tiainen M, Mäkelä TP. The LKB1 tumor suppressor kinase in human disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1775:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tep C, Kim ML, Opincariu LI, Limpert AS, Chan JR, Appel B, Carter BD, Yoon SO. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) induces polarized signaling of small GTPase (Rac1) protein at the onset of Schwann cell myelination through partitioning-defective 3 (Par3) protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:1600–1608. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.312736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Susuki K, Raphael AR, Ogawa Y, Stankewich MC, Peles E, Talbot WS, Rasband MN. Schwann cell spectrins modulate peripheral nerve myelination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2011;108:8009–8014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019600108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chan JR, Jolicoeur C, Yamauchi J, Elliot J, Fawcett JP, Ng BK, Cayouette M. The Polarity Protein Par-3 Directly Interacts with p75NTR to Regulate Myelination. Science. 2006;314:832–836. doi: 10.1126/science.1134069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Salzer JL. Polarized domains of myelinated axons. Neuron. 2003;40:297–318. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00628-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Poliak S, Matlis S, Ullmer C, Scherer SS, Peles E. Distinct claudins and associated PDZ proteins form different autotypic tight junctions in myelinating Schwann cells. J. Cell Biol. 2002;159:361–372. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200207050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ozçelik M, Cotter L, Jacob C, Pereira JA, Relvas JB, Suter U, Tricaud N. Pals1 is a major regulator of the epithelial-like polarization and the extension of the myelin sheath in peripheral nerves. J. Neurosci. 2011;30:4120–4131. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5185-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cotter L, Ozçelik M, Jacob C, Pereira JA, Locher V, Baumann R, Relvas JB, Suter U, Tricaud N. Dlg1-PTEN interaction regulates myelin thickness to prevent damaging peripheral nerve overmyelination. Science. 2010;328:1415–1418. doi: 10.1126/science.1187735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lewallen KA, Shen YA, De La Torre AR, Ng BK, Meijer D, Chan JR. Assessing the role of N-cadherin at the Schwann cell-axon interface and in the initiation of myelination. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:3032–3043. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4345-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Golan N, Kartvelishvily E, Spiegel I, Salomon D, Sabanay H, Rechav K, Vainshtein A, Frechter S, Maik-Rachline G, Eshed-Eisenbach Y, Momoi T, Peles E. Genetic deletion of Cadm4 results in myelin abnormalities resembling charcot-marie-tooth neuropathy. J. Neurosci. 2013;27:10950–10961. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0571-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Spiegel I, Adamsky K, Eshed Y, Milo R, Sabanay H, Sarig-Nadir O, Horresh I, Scherer SS, Rasband MN, Peles E. A central role for Necl4 (SynCAM4) in Schwann cell-axon interaction and myelination. Nat. Neurosci. 2007;10:861–869. doi: 10.1038/nn1915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maurel P, Einheber S, Galinska J, Thaker P, Lam I, Rubin MB, Scherer SS, Murakami Y, Gutmann DH, Salzer JL. Nectin-like proteins mediate axon Schwann cell interactions along the internode and are essential for myelination. J. Cell Biol. 2007;178:861–874. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200705132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Benninger Y, Thurnherr T, Pereira JA, Krause S, Wu X, Chrostek-Grashoff A, Herzog D, Nave KA, Franklin RJ, Meijer D, Brakebusch C, Suter U, Relvas JB. Essential and distinct roles for cdc42 and rac1 in the regulation of Schwann cell biology during peripheral nervous system development. J. Cell Biol. 2007;177:1051–1061. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200610108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nodari A, Zambroni D, Quattrini A, Court FA, D'Urso A, Recchia A, Tybulewicz VL, Wrabetz L, Feltri L. Beta1 integrin activates Rac1 in Schwann cells to generate radial lamellae during axonal sorting and myelination. J. Cell Biol. 2007;177:1063–1075. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200610014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen X, Macara IG. Par-3 controls tight junction assembly through the Rac exchange factor Tiam1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005;7:262–269. doi: 10.1038/ncb1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nishimura T, Yamaguchi T, Kato K, Yoshizawa M, Nabeshima Y, Ohno S, Hoshino M, Kaibuchi K. PAR-6-PAR-3 mediates Cdc42-induced Rac activation through the Rac GEFs STEF/Tiam1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005;7:270–277. doi: 10.1038/ncb1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Konno D, Shioi G, Shitamukai A, Mori A, Kiyonari H, Miyata T, Matsuzaki F. Neuroepithelial progenitors undergo LGN-dependent planar divisions to maintain self-renewability during mammalian neurogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:93–101. doi: 10.1038/ncb1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morin X, Jaouen F, Durbec P. Control of planar divisions by the G-protein regulator LGN maintains progenitors in the chick neuroepithelium. Nat. Neurosci. 2007;10:1440–1448. doi: 10.1038/nn1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Siller KH, Cabernard C, Doe CQ. The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006;8:594–600. doi: 10.1038/ncb1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Izumi Y, Ohta N, Hisata K, Raabe T, Matsuzaki F. Drosophila Pins-binding protein Mud regulates spindle-polarity coupling and centrosome organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006;8:586–593. doi: 10.1038/ncb1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zigman M, Cayouette M, Charalambous C, Schleiffer A, Hoeller O, Dunican D, McCudden CR, Firnberg N, Barres BA, Siderovski DP, Knoblich JA. Mammalian inscuteable regulates spindle orientation and cell fate in the developing retina. Neuron. 2005;48:539–545. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Betschinger J, Knoblich JA. Dare to be different: asymmetric cell division in Drosophila, C. elegans and vertebrates. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:R674–R685. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cai Y, Yu F, Lin S, Chia W, Yang X. Apical complex genes control mitotic spindle geometry and relative size of daughter cells in Drosophila neuroblast and pI asymmetric divisions. Cell. 2003;112:51–62. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01170-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Colombo K, Grill SW, Kimple RJ, Willard FS, Siderovski DP, Gonczy P. Translation of polarity cues into asymmetric spindle positioning in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Science. 2003;300:1957–1961. doi: 10.1126/science.1084146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsou MF, Hayashi A, Rose LS. LET-99 opposes Galpha/GPR signaling to generate asymmetry for spindle positioning in response to PAR and MES-1/SRC-1 signaling. Development. 2003;130:5717–5730. doi: 10.1242/dev.00790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schaefer M, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Knoblich JA. A protein complex containing Inscuteable and the Galpha-binding protein Pins orients asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2000;10:353–362. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00401-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yu F, Morin X, Cai Y, Yang X, Chia W. Analysis of partner of inscuteable, a novel player of Drosophila asymmetric divisions, reveals two distinct steps in inscuteable apical localization. Cell. 2000;100:399–409. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80676-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schober M, Schaefer M, Knoblich JA. Bazooka recruits Inscuteable to orient asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nature. 1999;402:548–551. doi: 10.1038/990135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pereira JA, Lebrun-Julien F, Suter U. Molecular mechanisms regulating myelination in the peripheral nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35:123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Novak N, Bar V, Sabanay H, Frechter S, Jaegle M, Snapper SB, Meijer D, Peles E. N-WASP is required for membrane wrapping and myelination by Schwann cells. J. Cell Biol. 2011;192:243–250. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201010013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Taveggia C, Zanazzi G, Petrylak A, Yano H, Rosenbluth J, Einheber S, Xu X, Esper RM, Loeb JA, Shrager P, Chao MV, Falls DL, Role L, Salzer JL. Neuregulin-1 type III determines the ensheathment fate of axons. Neuron. 2005;47:681–694. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Michailov GV, Sereda MW, Brinkmann BG, Fischer TM, Haug B, Birchmeier C, Role L, Lai C, Schwab MH, Nave KA. Axonal neuregulin-1 regulates myelin sheath thickness. Science. 2004;304:700–703. doi: 10.1126/science.1095862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Arimura N, Kaibuchi K. Neuronal polarity: from extracellular signals to intracellular mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8:194–205. doi: 10.1038/nrn2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Arimura N, Kaibuchi K. Key regulators in neuronal polarity. Neuron. 2005;48:881–884. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Da Silva JS, Hasegawa T, Miyagi T, Dotti CG, Abad-Rodriguez J. Asymmetric membrane ganglioside sialidase activity specifies axonal fate. Nat. Neurosci. 2005;8:606–615. doi: 10.1038/nn1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wiggin GR, Fawcett JP, Pawson T. Polarity proteins in axon specification and synaptogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:803–816. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.von Stein W, Ramrath A, Grimm A, Muller-Borg M, Wodarz A. Direct association of Bazooka/PAR-3 with the lipid phosphatase PTEN reveals a link between the PAR/aPKC complex and phosphoinositide signaling. Development. 2005;132:1675–1686. doi: 10.1242/dev.01720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shackelford DB, Shaw RJ. The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:563–575. doi: 10.1038/nrc2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Song P, Xie Z, Wu Y, Xu J, Dong Y, Zou MH. Protein kinase Czeta-dependent LKB1 serine 428 phosphorylation increases LKB1 nucleus export and apoptosis in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:12446–12455. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708208200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 44.Sapkota GP, Kieloch A, Lizcano JM, Lain S, Arthur JS, Williams MR, Morrice N, Deak M, Alessi DR. Phosphorylation of the protein kinase mutated in Peutz-Jeghers cancer syndrome, LKB1/STK11, at Ser431 by p90(RSK) and cAMP-dependent protein kinase, but not its farnesylation at Cys(433), is essential for LKB1 to suppress cell growth. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:19469–19482. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009953200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shelly M, Cancedda L, Heilshorn S, Sumbre G, Poo MM. LKB1/STRAD promotes axon initiation during neuronal polarization. Cell. 2007;129:565–577. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Martin SG, St Johnston D. A role for Drosophila LKB1 in anterior-posterior axis formation and epithelial polarity. Nature. 2003;421:379–384. doi: 10.1038/nature01296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yoon C, Korade Z, Carter BD. Protein kinase A-induced phosphorylation of the p65 subunit of nuclear factor-kappaB promotes Schwann cell differentiation into a myelinating phenotype. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:3738–3746. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4439-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Howe DG, McCarthy KD. Retroviral inhibition of cAMP-dependent protein kinase inhibits myelination but not Schwann cell mitosis stimulated by interaction with neurons. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:3513–3521. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-10-03513.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim HA, DeClue JE, Ratner N. cAMP-dependent protein kinase A is required for Schwann cell growth: interactions between the cAMP and neuregulin/tyrosine kinase pathways. J. Neurosci. Res. 1997;49:236–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Flores AI, Narayanan SP, Morse EN, Shick HE, Yin X, Kidd G, Avila RL, Kirschner DA, Macklin WB. Constitutively active Akt induces enhanced myelination in the CNS. J Neurosci. 2008;28:7174–7183. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0150-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Goebbels S, Oltrogge JH, Kemper R, Heilmann I, Bormuth I, Wolfer S, Wichert SP, Möbius W, Liu X, Lappe-Siefke C, Rossner MJ, Groszer M, Suter U, Frahm J, Boretius S, Nave KA. Elevated phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate in glia triggers cell-autonomous membrane wrapping and myelination. J Neurosci. 2010;30:8953–8964. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0219-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Harrington EP, Zhao C, Fancy SP, Kaing S, Franklin RJ, Rowitch DH. Oligodendrocyte PTEN is required for myelin and axonal integrity, not remyelination. Ann. Neurol. 2010;68:703–716. doi: 10.1002/ana.22090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sherman DL, Krols M, Wu LM, Grove M, Nave KA, Gangloff YG, Brophy PJ. Arrest of myelination and reduced axon growth when Schwann cells lack mTOR. J Neurosci. 2012;32:1817–1825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4814-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bercury KK, Dai J, Sachs HH, Ahrendsen JT, Wood TL, Macklin WB. Conditional ablation of raptor or rictor has differential impact on oligodendrocyte differentiation and CNS myelination. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:4466–4480. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4314-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wahl SE, McLane LE, Bercury KK, Macklin WB, Wood TL. Mammalian target of rapamycin promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation, initiation and extent of CNS myelination. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:4453–4465. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4311-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ishii A, Furusho M, Bansal R. Sustained Activation of ERK1/2 MAPK in Oligodendrocytes and Schwann Cells Enhances Myelin Growth and Stimulates Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Expansion. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:175–186. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4403-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.