Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1973 May;70(5):1393–1396. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1393

Effects of Continuous Noise on Avian Hearing and Vocal Development

Peter Marler *, Masakazu Konishi , Ann Lutjen *, Mary Sue Waser *
PMCID: PMC433504  PMID: 4514308

Abstract

Continuous loud noice was used to mask auditory feedback from vocal behavior of male canaries. Single unit techniques demonstrate partial deafness after noise exposure. Longer exposure caused greater deficits, with losses of high-frequency sensitivity. Males raised in noise to 40 days of age, then deafened surgically, thus totally deprived of auditory feedback from vocalization, developed significantly fewer song syllables than birds similarly raised but left intact, to mature in quiet sound-insulated chambers. Males left longer in noise, to sexual maturity at 200 days of age, sang at first like surgically deafend birds, but then increased their song syllable repertoire after noise termination. Thus, in spite of the considerable deafness resulting from noise exposure, the deficit in syllable repertoire was corrected, presumably as a result of restoration of the birds' ability to hear their own song.

Keywords: single-unit recording, noise-induced deafness, auditory feedback, masking noise, vocalization deficits

Full text

PDF
1393

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dooling R. J., Mulligan J. A., Miller J. D. Auditory sensitivity and song spectrum of the common canary (Serinus canarius). J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Aug;50(2):700–709. doi: 10.1121/1.1912686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Konishi M. Effects of deafening on song development in American robins and black-headed grosbeaks. Z Tierpsychol. 1965 Aug;22(5):584–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Konishi M. Hearing, single-unit analysis, and vocalizations in songbirds. Science. 1969 Nov 28;166(3909):1178–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3909.1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Konishi M. The attributes of instinct. Behaviour. 1966;27(3):316–328. doi: 10.1163/156853966x00209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Konishi M. The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. Z Tierpsychol. 1965 Dec;22(7):770–783. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nottebohm F., Nottebohm M. E. Vocalizations and breeding behaviour of surgically deafened ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). Anim Behav. 1971 May;19(2):313–327. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(71)80012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES