Skip to main content
F1000Prime Reports logoLink to F1000Prime Reports
. 2015 Feb 3;7:23. doi: 10.12703/P7-23

Root hair growth: it's a one way street

Amelie Mendrinna 1, Staffan Persson 1,2,
PMCID: PMC4335795  PMID: 25750741

Abstract

Over the last few decades, our understanding of directed cell growth in different organisms has substantially improved. Tip-growing cells in plants elongate rapidly via targeted deposition of cell wall and membrane material at the cell apex, and use turgor pressure as a driving force for expansion. This type of polar growth requires a high degree of coordination between a plethora of cellular and extracellular components and compounds, including calcium dynamics, apoplastic reactive oxygen species and pH, the cytoskeleton, and vesicular trafficking. In this review, we attempt to outline and summarize the factors that control root hair growth and how they work together as a team.

Introduction

Filamentous cells represent an important advance in cellular growth and are also important devices for the colonization of land by fungi and plants [1]. For example, filamentous growth in the form of aseptate hyphae evolved as an excellent tool for exploring dry soils [2]. This innovation also enabled the fungi to establish close relationships with land plants, for example, through symbiotic relationships that resemble arbuscular mycorrhizal associations today. In arbuscular mycorrhiza, tip-growing fungal hyphae rapidly enter plant root tissue to establish a mutually beneficial relationship [3]. The first tip-growing cells in land-plants arose about 450 million years ago in bryophytes, which used filamentous rhizoids for anchoring themselves to the soil [1]. In plants today, two types of tip-growing cells dominate; pollen tubes and root hairs. While pollen tubes provided for water-independent propagation of species [4], root hairs bestowed an increase in root surface area that could be used to increase nutrient uptake and better anchor plants in the soil. Root hairs and pollen tubes are filamentous cells that grow uni-directionally by depositing flexible cell wall material at one site of the cell and exploiting turgor pressure as the driving force for elongation; a process also referred to as tip growth (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Regulators of directed cell growth in root hairs and pollen tubes.

Figure 1.

Root hair and pollen tube tip growth include a variety of cellular components and compounds that work in concert. The intracellular calcium concentration plays a central role in plant tip growth, and regulates actin dynamics via actin interacting proteins, such as villin and ADF. These proteins are likely involved in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton at different sites in the root hair. Microtubules are located net axially, i.e. along the shank, and reach into the subapical region of the root hair. Their dynamic behaviour is regulated by the microtubule plus end-tracking protein ARK1 and is important for maintenance of polarity and growth direction. Calcium also activates respiratory burst oxidase homologues (Rbohs). These produce ROS (H2O2 and OH·) which mediate cell wall relaxation and peroxidase-mediated wall stiffening. ROS may also partake in a positive feedback loop by activating calcium influx from the apoplast into the cytosol. The channels responsible for calcium influx are not known in root hairs but, in pollen tubes, CNGC and GLR channels have been identified. Furthermore, calcium seems to influence extracellular pH (possibly via H+-ATPases), which contributes to changes in cell wall structure during growth. Cellulose microfibrils are short and randomly oritientated in the cell wall of the growing tip, whereas a well ordered second layer of cellulose microfibrils occurs in the shank. This organization promotes dynamic cell wall extension exclusively at the tip. In pollen tubes PMEs mediate the crosslinking of pectins in the shank and remain inactive at the tip after inactivation through PMEIs. Pectin, PMEs and PMEIs are delivered from the Golgi/trans Golgi network to the plasma membrane of the pollen tube tip via actin-dependent vesicle trafficking. Vesicles are spacially directed by the distribution of PIs in the plasma membrane and are transported along the actin cytoskeleton via motor proteins. Tip growth is regulated by several plasma membrane receptor-like kinases, for example, FERONIA and ANXUR. FERONIA is known to regulate ROP signaling pathways via interaction with ROP guanine nucleutide exchange factors. Important ROP effectors in pollen tubes are RICs that directly influence tip growth by interaction with bundled and fine F-actin and modulation of intracellular calcium concentrations. Abbreviations: ADF, actin depolymerizing factor; ARK1, armadillo-repeat kinesin 1; CNGC, cyclic nucleotide-gated channel; GLR, glutamate receptor-like; PI, inositol phosphate; PME, pectin-methyl-esterase; PMEI, PME inhibitor; RIC, Rop-interactive CRIB motif-containing; ROP, Rho of plant GTPase; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Although these tip-growing systems are very similar, they also display differences in their growth-related molecular machineries. In view of the fact that soil nutrient availability, water accessibility and soil condition are strongly affected by climate change [5,6], the study of root hair tip growth is a timely topic to help us to understand and improve plant growth and will therefore be the main focus of this review.

Root hair growth: from the inside to the outside

While delicate, root hairs are excellent experimental model systems for polarized cell growth. They reach growth rates of typically 1 μm min-1 or more [7] without losing cell wall integrity. This implies an extremely efficient system for delivering and modifying membrane and cell wall material at the tip apex. This system will therefore need to be highly coordinated, and involves a tip-derived calcium gradient, cytoskeleton dynamics, delivery of new cell wall material via vesicle trafficking, regulation of extracellular pH, and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). How these players are geared to each other is only partly known, but recent studies have made great progress leading to a better understanding of the coordination.

Intracellular calcium and ROS

Two of the major signal transducers for root hair growth and function are Ca2+ and ROS (Figure 1). Calcium is a crucial and general regulator of plant cell growth and development, and is perhaps the most important factor for maintenance of tip growth where it is distributed as a continuous gradient in the cytosol, with the highest concentration close to the tip apex [8]. Furthermore, the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration displays periodic cycling that follows the rate of growth of the tip. This cycling appears to be coordinated with a rise and decline of both apoplastic pH and ROS production. These findings suggest that changes in Ca2+ concentrations might regulate growth by the activation of ROS production, and by increasing the pH, at the cell surface [9]. The production of cell surface ROS in turn activates Ca2+ influx into the cell and thereby completes a positive feedback loop [10,11].

The increase in cytosolic Ca2+ is typically facilitated by membrane located Ca2+ channels. While the identity of these channels are not known in root hairs, cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNGC), and glutamate receptor-like (GLR), channels were identified as Ca2+ influx channels [24] in pollen tubes, and perhaps a similar scenario could be envisioned during root hair growth. The function of the fluctuations in intracellular Ca2+ may modulate components important for tip growth, such as cytoskeleton-organizing factors, and ROS and pH homeostasis as alluded to above. However, it may also alter the apoplastic Ca2+ levels that can influence changes in the cell wall.

Cytoskeleton and vesicles

In tip growing cells, the actin cytoskeleton is typically organized as thick actin bundles that run in parallel with the root hair shank supporting an inverse fountain flow of cytoplasmic streaming, and as fine filamentous structures at the apex of the tip that keep this region free of larger cell organelles [58]. The organization of the actin cytoskeleton is controlled by a variety of actin binding proteins (ABPs), which aid in nucleation, depolymerisation and cross-linking of the actin cytoskeleton [8]. The activity of some of these components may be influenced by Ca2+. For example, Ca2+ may influence actin depolymerizing factor (ADF) in maize that can increase actin turnover by severing actin filaments [9], and villins that can influence the bundling of actin. This implicates Ca2+ fluxes and ABPs in the actin organization in root hairs.

The role of the actin cytoskeleton as a scaffold for polarized membrane trafficking is well established in root hairs. In particular, new membrane and cell wall material must be delivered to the tip apex to support the rapid growth. The cell wall material is engulfed in vesicles that move along the actin cytoskeleton via motor proteins. Two recently characterized motor proteins of the MYOSIN XI family that function in actin-dependent transport of cell organelles, vesicles and protein complexes [10,11], are required for normal actin dynamics and fast root hair growth [12,13].

Vesicle secretion can also be controlled by other factors, including Rab GTPases [14] and inositol phosphates (PIs). For example, PI-4P and PI-4,5P2 accumulate in the plasma membrane at the root hair apex where they might orchestrate growth by recruiting other important proteins containing PI-4P or PI-4,5P2 binding domains. One such example is the ADP ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein AGD1, which is necessary for maintenance of polarity during root hair growth [15]. Membrane secretion in root hair growth is also influenced by the exocyst complex, a Rho and Rop GTPase effector, that tethers vesicles to their target membranes [16,17].

Both the actin cytoskeleton and the microtubules are important during root hair growth. Cortical microtubules are oriented net axially along the fringe of the root hair tube, while endoplasmic microtubules reach from the perinuclear cytoplasm towards the tip [6,18]. Microtubule stabilizing or destabilizing treatments using taxol or oryzalin, respectively, lead to wavy and occasionally branched root hair phenotypes [6,19]. Similar phenotypes were also found in ark1 mutants lacking the functional microtubule plus-end tracking protein armadillo-repeat kinesin 1 (ARK1). ARK1 plays a key role in root hair tip growth by promoting microtubule catastrophe events [20].

In summary, while the actin cytoskeleton plays an important role as a dynamic scaffold for proper vesicle delivery in polarized root hair elongation, the microtubules are required for maintenance of cell polarity and directed growth.

Root hair cell walls

The cell wall is a dynamic structure that determines the shape of the root hair (Figure 1). Here, one can illustrate the cell wall as a corset that readily allows for expansion at the tip, but provides resistance against the turgor pressure along the shank [21]. Cellulose is a major load-bearing structure of the cell wall and is therefore the main contributor to the corset function. Two partially redundant members of the cellulose synthase (CesA)-like (CSL) superfamily, CSLD2 and CSLD3, are located at the root hair tip and are required for its growth [22,23]. Notably, at the growing tip of the root hair the cellulose microfibrils are short and randomly orientated, as revealed by ultrastructural studies [2426]. In contrast, the shank behind the actively growing tip contains a second layer of highly ordered cellulose microfibrils oriented transversely to the axis of expansion [2628].

Neighboring cellulose fibrils are interlinked with matrix polymers, such as hemicelluloses and pectins. Lesions in enzymes that synthesize some of these matrix polymers, for example, xyloglucans, led to root hair growth defects, perhaps due to mis-alignment of cellulose fibrils [29,30]. Whereas the xyloglucans thus influence root hair growth, the role of pectins is not well explored. However, pectins do have a prominent role in pollen tube growth. Here, pectin-methyl-esterases (PMEs), which de-methylesterify carboxyl residues on the pectin backbone, can affect the cell wall viscosity. Through the PME action, carboxyl residues are set free to bind Ca2+, which results in pectin cross-linking and presumably cell wall tightening at the pollen tube tip [3134]. PME and its inhibitors, PMEIs, are, furthermore, spatio-temporally distributed along the pollen tube with a preferential activity of PMEs at the shank and PMEIs at the tip, which results in a distinct pectic composition of the pollen tube cell wall [35]. It is possible that similar distributions also may play a role in root hair growth. In addition, extensins, cell wall structural proteins, are of crucial importance for root hair development, possibly for maintaining cell wall stability. These proteins may be post-translationally modified by O-linked glycosylation, and this modification alters cell wall properties during root hair growth [36]. Recently, PFT1/MED25, a transcriptional Mediator complex subunit, was revealed to orchestrate the expression of cell wall remodelling genes including a set of peroxidases and cell wall cross-linking extensins and being required for redox homeostasis in roots and normal root hair formation [37]. These results indicate that the cell wall proteome could be a useful source to find cell wall and, therefore, tip growth modulators. However, results on the proteomic composition of root hair cell walls are scarce, not only because separating cell wall proteins from the cell wall matrix is generally challenging, but also because isolating a reasonable amount of protein from root hairs for analysis is difficult. Strategies that circumvent these problems will be major future challenges.

Not only calcium/pectin interactions but also surface ROS and pH are thought to directly influence cell wall viscosity of the tip surface. Hydroxyl radicals can cleave polysaccharides and thereby promote wall relaxation [3840]. On the other hand, H2O2 is a substrate for peroxidases that help to stiffen the wall via crosslinking of cell wall polysaccharides [41]. This may seem like a paradox and a tight coordination between these processes is likely to occur, but how this is achieved remains unclear.

Surface pH may also influence the cell wall viscosity by activation of the expansins, non-hydrolytic cell wall-loosening proteins, and other cell wall modifying enzymes, which promote cell wall relaxation [4244].

Who holds the reins?

Although the molecular organization of root hair growth is described with increasing detail, how internal and environmental growth-regulating signals are sensed and integrated remains enigmatic. Nevertheless, some recent reports have begun to shed some light on this topic. In plants several receptor-like kinase (RLK) family members are implicated in relaying information about cell wall integrity (CWI) to the inside of the cell (Figure 1). These RLKs may therefore also be referred to as CWI sensors [45]. The redundant Cataranthus roseus RLK1-like subfamily members ANXUR1 (ANX1) and ANX2 are required for pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis. The ANX1 and 2 are the closest relatives to FERONIA (FER), which is essential for both pollen tube and root hair growth [4652]. FER can affect ROS production via the regulation of Rho of plant GTPases (ROPs). ROPs accumulate in the apical plasma membrane of root hairs and other tip-growing cells, and impact actin dynamics and vesicle trafficking. For example, two counteracting Rop-interactive CRIB motif-containing (RIC) proteins control pollen tube growth by regulating F-actin dynamics [53,54]. Similar effector proteins might regulate actin dynamics and vesicle trafficking in root hairs.

It is tempting to speculate that cell wall derived compounds may be putative ligands for the CWI related RLKs. This has, for example, been shown to be the case for the wall-associated kinase family that binds pectins. Furthermore, a secreted small peptide hormone, rapid alkalinisation factor (RALF) negatively regulates cell elongation by binding to the FER receptor as a ligand [55]. Against this backdrop, other small peptides may be considered as ligands for CWI related RLKs in root hair growth. While these data are encouraging, the identification of ligands for receptors is not a trivial task. The activated receptors may subsequently cause alterations in intra- and extracellular ion homeostasis, which brings us back to the Ca2+, ROS and additional signalling compounds with which we began this review.

Conclusion and perspectives

Recent undertakings have greatly improved our understanding of root hair growth (Figure 1). For example, the development of highly sophisticated calcium, pH and ROS sensors has revealed a tight interplay between these factors. The recent identification of several new players in the molecular synergy of root hair growth has also stimulated the field. Yet, many questions remain. Firstly, how are internal and external processes coordinated during root hair growth? Secondly, cell wall biosynthesis in root hair cells differs from most other cell types. But what exactly is controlling these differences? Thirdly, calcium, extracellular pH and ROS are important regulators of tip growth, implicated by their correlated cyclic patterns. However, the mechanisms that directly link these regulators are still largely missing, as are the identities of the ion channels that contribute to the Ca2+ uptake. Lastly, what are the CWI sensors that the tip growing cells use, how are they activated and what are they regulating? These are important factors specifying external status of the root hairs but progress in this field is still in its infancy.

Experiments aiming at answering these questions can provide us not only with new insights into how root hair growth works but might be applicable to other tip growing systems, and to elucidate general developmental patterns during cell growth.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Drs. Heather McFarlane and Clara Sanchez-Rodriguez for useful comments on the manuscript. Amelie Mendrinna and Staffan Persson were funded by the Max-Planck Gesellschaft.

Abbreviations

ABP

actin binding protein

ADF

actin depolymerizing factor

ANX1

ANXUR1

ARK1

armadillo-repeat kinesin 1

CNGC

cyclic nucleotide-gated channel

CSL

cellulose synthase-like

CWI

cell wall integrity

FER

FERONIA

GLR

glutamate receptor-like

PI

inositol phosphate

PME

pectin-methyl-esterase

PMEI

PME inhibitor

RLK

receptor-like kinase

ROP

Rho of plant GTPase

ROS

reactive oxygen species

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no disclosures.

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found at: http://f1000.com/prime/reports/b/7/23

References

  • 1.Jones VA, Dolan L. The evolution of root hairs and rhizoids. Ann Bot. 2012;110:205–12. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chang F, Yan A, Zhao L, Wu W, Yang Z. A putative calcium-permeable cyclic nucleotide-gated channel, CNGC18, regulates polarized pollen tube growth. J Integr Plant Bio. 2007;49:1261–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.00524.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frietsch S, Wang Y, Sladek C, Poulsen LR, Romanowsky SM, Schroeder JI, Harper JF. A cyclic nucleotide-gated channel is essential for polarized tip growth of pollen. Proc Natl Aca Sci USA. 2007;104:14531–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701781104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Michard E, Lima PT, Borges F, Silva AC, Portes MT, Carvalho JE, Gilliham M, Liu L, Obermeyer G, Feijó JA. Glutamate receptor-like genes form Ca2+ channels in pollen tubes and are regulated by pistil D-serine. Science. 2011;332:434–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1201101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/10038956
  • 5.Miller DD, de Ruijter NCA, Bisseling T, Emons AMC. The role of actin in root hair morphogenesis: studies with lipochito-oligosaccharide as a growth stimulator and cytochalasin as an actin perturbing drug. Plant Journal. 1999;17:141–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00358.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ketelaar T, Faivre-Moskalenko C, Esseling JJ, de Ruijter Norbert CA, Grierson CS, Dogterom M, Emons, Anne Mie C. Positioning of nuclei in Arabidopsis root hairs: an actin-regulated process of tip growth. Plant cell. 2002;14:2941–55. doi: 10.1105/tpc.005892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1011983
  • 7.Ketelaar T, de Ruijter NC, Emons AM. Unstable F-actin specifies the area and microtubule direction of cell expansion in Arabidopsis root hairs. Plant cell. 2003;15:285–92. doi: 10.1105/tpc.007039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ketelaar T. The actin cytoskeleton in root hairs: all is fine at the tip. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16:749–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maciver SK, Hussey PJ. The ADF/cofilin family: actin-remodeling proteins. Genome Bio. 2002;3 doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-5-reviews3007. reviews3007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee YJ, Liu B. Cytoskeletal motors in Arabidopsis. Sixty-one kinesins and seventeen myosins. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:3877–83. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.052621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reisen D, Hanson MR. Association of six YFP-myosin XI-tail fusions with mobile plant cell organelles. BMC Plant Bio. 2007;7:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Peremyslov VV, Prokhnevsky AI, Avisar D, Dolja VV. Two class XI myosins function in organelle trafficking and root hair development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:1109–16. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.113654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1099464
  • 13.Park E, Nebenführ A. Myosin XIK of Arabidopsis thaliana accumulates at the root hair tip and is required for fast root hair growth. PloS one. 2013;8:e76745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/718138751
  • 14.Preuss ML, Serna J, Falbel TG, Bednarek SY, Nielsen E. The Arabidopsis Rab GTPase RabA4b localizes to the tips of growing root hair cells. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1589–603. doi: 10.1105/tpc.021634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yoo C, Quan L, Cannon AE, Wen J, Blancaflor EB. AGD1, a class 1 ARF-GAP, acts in common signaling pathways with phosphoinositide metabolism and the actin cytoskeleton in controlling Arabidopsis root hair polarity. Plant J. 2012;69:1064–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Synek L, Schlager N, Elias M, Quentin M, Hauser MT, Zarsky V. AtEXO70A1, a member of a family of putative exocyst subunits specifically expanded in land plants, is important for polar growth and plant development. Plant J. 2006;48:54–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02854.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1040797
  • 17.Wen T, Hochholdinger F, Sauer M, Bruce W, Schnable PS. The roothairless1 gene of maize encodes a homolog of sec3, which is involved in polar exocytosis. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:1637–43. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.062174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Bruaene N, Joss G, van Oostveldt P. Reorganization and in vivo dynamics of microtubules during Arabidopsis root hair development. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:3905–19. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.031591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bibikova TN, Blancaflor EB, Gilroy S. Microtubules regulate tip growth and orientation in root hairs of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1999;17:657–65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Eng RC, Wasteneys GO. The microtubule plus-end tracking protein ARMADILLO-REPEAT KINESIN1 promotes microtubule catastrophe in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26:3372–86. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.126789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/718546436
  • 21.Cosgrove DJ. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2005;6:850–61. doi: 10.1038/nrm1746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Park S, Szumlanski AL, Gu F, Guo F, Nielsen E. A role for CSLD3 during cell-wall synthesis in apical plasma membranes of tip-growing root-hair cells. Nat Cell Bio. 2011;13:973–80. doi: 10.1038/ncb2294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/13312956
  • 23.Yoo CM, Quan L, Blancaflor EB. Divergence and redundancy in CSLD2 and CSLD3 function during Arabidopsis thaliana root hair and female gametophyte development. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Newcomb EH, Bonnett HT. Cytoplasmic microtubule and wall microfibril orientation in root hairs of radish. J Cell Biol. 1965;27:575–89. doi: 10.1083/jcb.27.3.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Galway ME, Heckman JW, Schiefelbein JW. Growth and ultrastructure of Arabidopsis root hairs: the rhd3 mutation alters vacuole enlargement and tip growth. Planta. 1997;201:209–18. doi: 10.1007/BF01007706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Akkerman M, Franssen-Verheijen MA, Immerzeel P, Hollander LN, Schel JH, Emons AM. Texture of cellulose microfibrils of root hair cell walls of Arabidopsis thaliana, Medicago truncatula, and Vicia sativa. J Microsc. 2012;247:60–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03611.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Emons AMC, Woltersarts AMC. Cortical microtubules and microfibril deposition in the cell-wall of root hairs of equisetum-hyemale. Protoplasma. 1983;117:68–81. doi: 10.1007/BF01281786. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Emons AMC, Kieft H. Winding threads around plant cells - applications of the geometrical model for microfibril deposition. Protoplasma. 1994;180:59–69. doi: 10.1007/BF01379224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cavalier DM, Lerouxel O, Neumetzler L, Yamauchi K, Reinecke A, Freshour G, Zabotina OA, Hahn MG, Burgert I, Pauly M, Raikhel NV, Keegstra K. Disrupting two Arabidopsis thaliana xylosyltransferase genes results in plants deficient in xyloglucan, a major primary cell wall component. Plant Cell. 2008;20:1519–37. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.059873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1115117
  • 30.Peña MJ, Kong Y, York WS, O'Neill MA. A galacturonic acid-containing xyloglucan is involved in Arabidopsis root hair tip growth. Plant Cell. 2012;24:4511–24. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.103390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/720400197
  • 31.Willats WG, McCartney L, Mackie W, Knox JP. Pectin: cell biology and prospects for functional analysis. Plant Mol Biol. 2001;47:9–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1010662911148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bosch M, Hepler PK. Pectin methylesterases and pectin dynamics in pollen tubes. Plant Cell. 2005;17:3219–26. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.037473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Palin R, Geitmann A. The role of pectin in plant morphogenesis. Biosystems. 2012;109:397–402. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2012.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wolf S, Greiner S. Growth control by cell wall pectins. Protoplasma. 2012;249(Suppl 2):S169–75. doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0371-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Röckel N, Wolf S, Kost B, Rausch T, Greiner S. Elaborate spatial patterning of cell-wall PME and PMEI at the pollen tube tip involves PMEI endocytosis, and reflects the distribution of esterified and de-esterified pectins. Plant J. 2008;53:133–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03325.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/721659452
  • 36.Velasquez SM, Ricardi MM, Dorosz JG, Fernandez PV, Nadra AD, Pol-Fachin L, Egelund J, Gille S, Harholt J, Ciancia M, Verli H, Pauly M, Bacic A, Olsen CE, Ulvskov P, Petersen BL, Somerville C, Iusem ND, Estevez JM. O-glycosylated cell wall proteins are essential in root hair growth. Science. 2011;332:1401–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1206657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/11653956
  • 37.Sundaravelpandian K, Chandrika NN, Schmidt W. PFT1, a transcriptional Mediator complex subunit, controls root hair differentiation through reactive oxygen species (ROS) distribution in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2013;197:151–61. doi: 10.1111/nph.12000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fry SC. Oxidative scission of plant cell wall polysaccharides by ascorbate-induced hydroxyl radicals. Biochem J. 1998;332:507–15. doi: 10.1042/bj3320507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fry SC, Dumville JC, Miller JG. Fingerprinting of polysaccharides attacked by hydroxyl radicals in vitro and in the cell walls of ripening pear fruit. Biochem J. 2001;357:729–37. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3570729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schopfer P. Hydroxyl radical-induced cell-wall loosening in vitro and in vivo: implications for the control of elongation growth. Plant J. 2001;28:679–88. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1004404
  • 41.Passardi F, Penel C, Dunand C. Performing the paradoxical: how plant peroxidases modify the cell wall. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:534–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rayle DL, Cleland R. Enhancement of wall loosening and elongation by Acid solutions. Plant Physiol. 1970;46:250–3. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.2.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cosgrove DJ. Characterization of long-term extension of isolated cell walls from growing cucumber hypocotyls. Planta. 1989;177:121–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00392162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.McQueen-Mason S, Durachko DM, Cosgrove DJ. Two endogenous proteins that induce cell-wall extension in plants. Plant Cell. 1992;4:1425. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.11.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wolf S, Hématy K, Höfte H. Growth control and cell wall signaling in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:381–407. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huck N, Moore JM, Federer M, Grossniklaus U. The Arabidopsis mutant feronia disrupts the female gametophytic control of pollen tube reception. Development. 2003;130:2149–59. doi: 10.1242/dev.00458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1012937
  • 47.Rotman N, Rozier F, Boavida L, Dumas C, Berger F, Faure J. Female control of male gamete delivery during fertilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Bio. 2003;13:432–6. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00093-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1010054
  • 48.Escobar-Restrepo J, Huck N, Kessler S, Gagliardini V, Gheyselinck J, Yang W, Grossniklaus U. The FERONIA receptor-like kinase mediates male-female interactions during pollen tube reception. Science. 2007;317:656–60. doi: 10.1126/science.1143562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1090228
  • 49.Guo H, Li L, Ye H, Yu X, Algreen A, Yin Y. Three related receptor-like kinases are required for optimal cell elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:7648–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812346106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/1160458
  • 50.Kessler SA, Shimosato-Asano H, Keinath NF, Wuest SE, Ingram G, Panstruga R, Grossniklaus U. Conserved molecular components for pollen tube reception and fungal invasion. Science. 2010;330:968–71. doi: 10.1126/science.1195211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/7269959
  • 51.Duan Q, Kita D, Li C, Cheung AY, Wu H. FERONIA receptor-like kinase regulates RHO GTPase signaling of root hair development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:17821–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005366107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/723908310
  • 52.Duan Q, Kita D, Johnson EA, Aggarwal M, Gates L, Wu H, Cheung AY. Reactive oxygen species mediate pollen tube rupture to release sperm for fertilization in Arabidopsis. Nature Commun. 2014;5:3129. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/718248414
  • 53.Gu Y, Vernoud V, Fu Y, Yang Z. ROP GTPase regulation of pollen tube growth through the dynamics of tip-localized F-actin. J Exp Bot. 2003;54:93–101. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gu Y, Fu Y, Dowd P, Li S, Vernoud V, Gilroy S, Yang Z. A Rho family GTPase controls actin dynamics and tip growth via two counteracting downstream pathways in pollen tubes. J Cell Biol. 2005;169:127–38. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200409140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/720060448
  • 55.Haruta M, Sabat G, Stecker K, Minkoff BB, Sussman MR. A peptide hormone and its receptor protein kinase regulate plant cell expansion. Science. 2014;343:408–11. doi: 10.1126/science.1244454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; http://f1000.com/prime/718249508

Articles from F1000Prime Reports are provided here courtesy of Faculty of 1000 Ltd

RESOURCES