Abstract
Echinocandins inhibit the synthesis of β-1,3-d-glucan in Candida and are the first-line therapy in numerous clinical settings. Their use is limited by poor oral bioavailability, and they are available only as intravenous therapies. Derivatives of enfumafungin are novel orally bioavailable glucan synthase inhibitors. We performed an in vivo pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluation with a novel enfumafungin derivative, SCY-078 (formerly MK-3118), in a well-established neutropenic murine model of invasive candidiasis against C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. The SCY-078 MICs varied 8-fold. Oral doses of 3.125 to 200 mg/kg SCY-078 salt in sterile water produced peak levels of 0.04 to 2.66 μg/ml, elimination half-lives of 5.8 to 8.5 h, areas under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24 h) of 0.61 to 41.10 μg · h/ml, and AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0—∞) values of 0.68 to 40.31 μg · h/ml. The pharmacokinetics (PK) were approximately linear over the dose range studied. Maximum response (Emax) and PK/PD target identification studies were performed with 4 C. albicans, 4 C. glabrata, and 3 C. parapsilosis isolates. The PD index AUC/MIC was explored by using total (tAUC) and free (fAUC) drug concentrations. The maximum responses were 4.0, 4.0, and 4.3 log10 CFU/kidney reductions for C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, respectively. The AUC/MIC was a robust predictor of efficacy (R2, 0.53 to 0.91). The 24-h PD targets were a static dose of 63.5 mg/kg, a tAUC/MIC of 500, and an fAUC/MIC of 1.0 for C. albicans; a static dose of 58.4 mg/kg, a tAUC/MIC of 315, and an fAUC/MIC of 0.63 for C. glabrata; and a static dose of 84.4 mg/kg, a tAUC/MIC of 198, and an fAUC/MIC of 0.40 for C. parapsilosis. The mean fAUC/MIC values associated with a 1-log kill endpoint against these species were 1.42, 1.26, and 0.91 for C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, respectively. The static and 1-log kill endpoints were measured relative to the burden at the start of therapy. The static and 1-log kill doses, as well as the total and free drug AUC/MIC PD targets, were not statistically different between species but were numerically lower than those observed for echinocandins. SCY-078 is a promising novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor against Candida species, and further investigation is warranted.
INTRODUCTION
Candida species are the most commonly encountered fungal pathogens in the hospital setting, are the fourth most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infection, and are associated with the highest mortality rates among infections caused by bloodstream isolates (1–3). In recent years, the etiological species has shifted in the United States and other parts of the world (3–5). Currently, non-albicans Candida species are implicated in >50% of cases of invasive candidiasis (IC) in the United States. This epidemiological shift has important treatment implications, as triazoles have limited effectiveness against some of these emerging non- albicans species, with resistance rates of up to 5% (6).
A major medical advance in fungal therapeutics was the development of the echinocandin drug class, which targets cell wall glucan synthesis, a major cell wall structural component in Candida species (7–10). The echinocandins provide coverage for a broad range of Candida species, including C. glabrata. Clinically, outcomes in patients treated with echinocandins against various forms of candidiasis, including IC, have demonstrated the equivalence or superiority of these compounds versus triazoles or amphotericin B (1, 11). Therefore, they have become the preferred therapeutic option in numerous clinical scenarios when Candida species are the infecting pathogen.
The large chemical structure (each ∼1,200 kDa) likely reduces the oral bioavailability of the current echinocandins. Therefore, only intravenous formulations of each of the three approved echinocandins are available for clinical use. The development of glucan synthase inhibitors that can be administered orally would represent a major step forward by providing a simple therapy transition to the ambulatory setting. The goal of the current studies was to identify the pharmacodynamic (PD) target for a novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor, SCY-078 (formerly MK-3118), an enfumafungin derivative under clinical development, against the three most commonly encountered Candida species, C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, using an in vivo neutropenic murine model of disseminated candidiasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antifungal agent.
The oral glucan synthase inhibitor SCY-078 was obtained from Merck as a preliminary salt in powder form, and drug formulations for administration were prepared in sterile distilled water. The formulations were typically suspensions, indicating that future formulation optimization may enhance exposure.
Strains.
Eleven clinical Candida isolates were used for the in vivo treatment studies, including four C. albicans, four C. glabrata, and three C. parapsilosis isolates (Table 1). The organisms were chosen based on similar fitness in the animal model as defined by the amount of growth in control animals over 24 h (Table 1). We also attempted to choose strains with various susceptibilities to the study drug. The strain set is susceptible to the echinocandins (12, 13). A subset of the collection is triazole resistant (14). The organisms were maintained, grown, and quantified on Sabouraud's dextrose agar (SDA) plates.
TABLE 1.
In vitro susceptibilities of select Candida isolates to SCY-078 and in vivo fitness in the neutropenic murine invasive candidiasis model
| Organism | MIC (μg/ml) | In vivo growth in control animals over 24 h (log10 CFU/kidney) |
|---|---|---|
| C. albicans isolates | ||
| 98-17a | 0.03 | 2.75 |
| 98-210a | 0.03 | 2.05 |
| 580a | 0.03 | 2.92 |
| K1 | 0.03 | 2.18 |
| All isolates (mean ± SD) | 2.47 ± 0.43 | |
| C. glabrata isolates | ||
| 5592 | 0.25 | 2.02 |
| 513 | 0.06 | 1.92 |
| 5376 | 0.03 | 2.01 |
| 33616 | 0.03 | 0.76 |
| All isolates (mean ± SD) | 1.68 ± 0.61 | |
| C. parapsilosis isolates | ||
| 20519.069 | 0.25 | 2.02 |
| 20477.048 | 0.125 | 2.55 |
| 20423.072 | 0.06 | 1.96 |
| All isolates (mean ± SD) | 2.18 ± 0.33 | |
| All organisms (mean ± SD) | 2.10 ± 0.56 |
Fluconazole nonsusceptible.
In vitro susceptibility testing.
All isolates were tested in accordance with the standards in CLSI document M27-A3 (15). The MICs were determined visually after 24 h of incubation as the lowest concentration of drug that causes a significant diminution (≥50%) of growth of control levels. MICs were determined on three separate occasions in duplicate. Results are expressed as the medians of these results.
Animals.
Six-week-old ICR Swiss/CD1 specific-pathogen-free female mice (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) weighing 23 to 27 g were used for all the studies. The animals were maintained in accordance with American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Care criteria (16). The animal studies were approved by the Animal Research Committee of the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital and the University of Wisconsin.
Infection model.
A neutropenic, murine, disseminated candidiasis model was used for the treatment studies (17–19). The mice were rendered neutropenic (polymorphonuclear cell count, <100/mm3) by injecting cyclophosphamide (Mead Johnson Pharmaceuticals, Evansville, IN) subcutaneously 4 days before infection (150 mg/kg of body weight), 1 day before infection (100 mg/kg), and 2 days after infection (100 mg/kg). Prior studies have demonstrated that this regimen produces neutropenia throughout the 96-h study period (20).
The organisms were subcultured on SDA plates 24 h prior to infection. The inoculum was prepared by placing 3 to 5 colonies into 5 ml of sterile pyrogen-free 0.15 M NaCl warmed to 35°C. The final inoculum was adjusted to a 0.6 transmittance at 530 nm. The fungal count of the inoculum determined by viable counts on SDA was 6.22 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/ml.
Disseminated infection with the Candida organisms was achieved by injection of 0.1 ml of the inoculum via the lateral tail vein 2 h prior to the start of antifungal therapy. At the end of the study period, the animals were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation. Then, the kidneys of each mouse were immediately removed and placed in 0.15 M NaCl at 4°C. The kidneys were homogenized and serially diluted 1:10, and the aliquots were plated onto SDA for viable fungal colony counts after incubation for 24 h at 35°C. The lower limit of detection was 100 CFU/ml. The results are expressed as the mean CFU/kidney for three mice.
Pharmacokinetics.
The single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) evaluation of SCY-078 was undertaken following oral doses of 3.125, 12.5, 50, and 200 mg/kg of SCY-078 salt. Plasma from the groups of three mice per time point was collected. The plasma drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A noncompartmental model was used in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Elimination half-lives were calculated by nonlinear least-squares techniques. The areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were calculated by the trapezoidal rule. For treatment doses in which no kinetics were determined, the pharmacokinetic indexes were estimated by linear extrapolation for higher and lower dose levels and by interpolation for dose levels within the dose range studied. Protein binding (99.8%) was based on a report of binding in mice from the sponsor.
Treatment efficacy and pharmacodynamic target determination.
Neutropenic mice were infected with 11 Candida strains as described above. The dosing regimens were chosen to vary the magnitude of the 24-h AUC/MIC index and to attempt to produce treatment effects that ranged from no effect to a maximal effect. Five dose levels that varied from 0.78 to 200 mg/kg were administered every 12 h in a 0.2-ml volume by the oral route for the 96-h study period. Groups of three mice were used for each dosing regimen. At the end of the treatment period, the mice were euthanized, and their kidneys were immediately processed for CFU determination as described above.
Data analysis.
A sigmoid dose-effect (Hill) model was used to measure the in vivo potency of SCY-078. The efficacy endpoints included the dose level required to produce a 24-h net static effect (no change in organism burden compared to that at the start of therapy) and the dose required to achieve a 1-log10 reduction in colony counts (relative to the burden at the start of therapy). The maximum response (Emax) was measured as the difference in the number of CFU/kidney relative to that of the untreated control animals. The PK/PD target associated with these endpoints was calculated from the equation log10 D = {log10 [E/(Emax − E)]/N} + log10 ED50, where D is the drug dose, E is the control growth in untreated animals, Emax is the maximal effect, N is the slope of the dose-response relationship, and ED50 is the dose needed to achieve 50% of the maximal effect. We used the PK/PD index AUC/MIC for calculating targets, as this has been shown to be associated with treatment efficacy in previous in vivo studies with the echinocandins (12, 17, 21–27). The calculations were performed using both total and free drug concentrations. The coefficient of determination (R2) was used to estimate the variance that might be due to regression with the PK/PD index. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if the differences in PK/PD targets were significant between the species.
RESULTS
In vitro susceptibility testing and in vivo organism fitness.
The MICs of SCY-078 against the study organisms are listed in Table 1. The MICs did not vary for C. albicans; all strains tested had the same MIC (0.03 μg/ml). The MIC range varied 8-fold for C. glabrata (range, 0.03 to 0.25 μg/ml) and 4-fold for C. parapsilosis (range, 0.06 to 0.25 μg/ml). All C. albicans and C. parapsilosis strains exhibited similar fitness levels with, on average, more than 2-log10 growth over a 24-h period (Table 1). Similar results were noted for three of the four C. glabrata isolates; however, one C. glabrata isolate (33616) exhibited a slightly decreased growth phenotype in untreated animals.
Pharmacokinetics.
The time-course plasma levels of SCY-078 in infected neutropenic mice after oral doses of 3.125, 12.5, 50, and 200 mg/kg SCY-078 salt are shown in Fig. 1. The pharmacokinetics of the drug were relatively linear over the dose range. The elimination half-life ranged from 5.9 h to 8.5 h in plasma. The maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) increased from 0.04 mg/liter to 2.66 mg/liter over the dose range. The AUC from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24 h) ranged from 0.61 μg · h/ml to 41.10 μg · h/ml, and the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞) ranged from 0.68 μg · h/ml to 40.31 μg · h/ml. Protein binding (99.8%) was based on previous studies in mice by the sponsor.
FIG 1.

Plasma concentrations of SCY-078 after oral administration of single doses of 3.125, 12.5, 50, and 200 mg/kg in infected neutropenic mice. The PK parameters, including half-lives (T1/2), maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), and areas under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC), are indicated. Each symbol represents the geometric mean ± standard deviation of the results determined for three mice.
Pharmacodynamic target.
At the start of therapy, the mice had 4.20 ± 0.38 log10 CFU/kidney. The organisms grew 2.10 ± 0.56 log10 CFU/kidney in the untreated control mice over 24 h following infection (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the burden at the start of therapy or growth in the untreated control animals among the three Candida species (Table 1). The dose-response curves for SCY-078 against C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis are shown in Fig. 2. Escalating doses of each compound resulted in concentration-dependent killing of all three Candida species. We did not observe a paradoxical effect over the dose range with the organisms utilized in this study. In general, the shapes of the exposure-response curves were similar for all strains. The location of the exposure-response curve was, in most cases, related to the MIC for the organism. The relationship between efficacy and 24-h AUC drug exposures and the PD index 24-h AUC/MIC is shown in Fig. 3 for each species. In Fig. 4, the integration of the PD index total AUC/MIC (tAUC/MIC) and free drug AUC/MIC (fAUC/MIC) and outcome is presented for each isolate. The PK/PD relationships for each of the organism groups were strong, as reflected in the relatively high R2 values (range, 0.53 to 0.91). This relationship was similarly strong when the data for the three species were considered together (R2 = 0.66; Fig. 4).
FIG 2.

In vivo dose-response curves for SCY-078 against C. albicans (A; 4 isolates), C. glabrata (B; 4 isolates), and C. parapsilosis (C; 3 isolates). Mice received one of a series of five 4-fold increasing doses of SCY-078 every 12 h over a 96-h treatment period. Each symbol represents the mean organism burden in the kidneys of three mice. The error bars represent the standard deviations. The dashed horizontal lines at 0 on the y axis represent the organism burden at the start of therapy. Symbols above the line represent net growth, whereas symbols below the line represent organism reduction, or killing, over the treatment period.
FIG 3.
Relationship between SCY-078 AUC and AUC/MIC index using total drug concentrations (tAUC) and in vivo efficacy against four C. albicans (A), four C. glabrata (B), and three C. parapsilosis (C) isolates. The panels on the left show outcome relative to 24-h AUC drug concentrations alone, and those on the right include an assessment of the AUC/MIC. Mice received one of a series of five 4-fold increasing doses of SCY-078 every 12 h over a 96-h treatment period. Each symbol represents the mean organism burden in the kidneys of three mice. The dashed horizontal lines at 0 on the y axis represent organism burden at the start of therapy. Symbols above the line represent net growth, whereas symbols below the line represent organism reduction, or killing, over the treatment period. The best-fit line for the Hill equation and the coefficient of determination (R2) are shown for each group.
FIG 4.

Relationship between SCY-078 AUC/MIC index using total (tAUC) and free (non-protein-bound, fAUC) drug concentrations and in vivo efficacy against C. albicans (4 isolates), C. glabrata (4 isolates), and C. parapsilosis (3 isolates). The panel on the left represents total drug concentrations, and the one on the right, free drug concentrations. Mice received one of a series of five 4-fold increasing doses of SCY-078 every 12 h over a 96-h treatment period. Each symbol represents the mean organism burden in the kidneys from three mice. The dashed horizontal lines at 0 on the y axis represent the organism burden at the start of therapy. Symbols above the line represent net growth, whereas symbols below the line represent organism reduction, or killing, over the treatment period. Also shown are the best-fit curves based on the Hill equation and the Emax, ED50, slope (N), and coefficient of determination (R2).
SCY-078 achieved the stasis endpoint against all 11 isolates. The 1-log kill endpoint was observed for 9 of 11 strains. Both endpoints were measured relative to the burden before the start of treatment. The mean Emax values were 4.0, 4.0, and 4.3 log10 CFU/kidney reductions over the experiment's duration (96 h) for C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, respectively (Table 2). The AUC/MIC (both total and free drug) values associated with the stasis and 1-log kill endpoints are also shown in Table 2. The mean total and free drug AUC/MIC values associated with a stasis endpoint were, respectively, 500.3 and 1.00 for C. albicans, 314.8 and 0.63 for C. glabrata, and 197.5 and 0.40 for C. parapsilosis. The total and free drug AUC/MIC values associated with a 1-log kill endpoint were, respectively, 711.1 and 1.42 for C. albicans, 631.1 and 1.26 for C. glabrata, and 455 and 0.91 for C. parapsilosis. While the free drug targets were slightly higher for the net stasis and 1-log kill values for C. albicans, these differences were not statistically significant by one-way ANOVA (P = 0.35 for stasis and P = 0.76 for 1-log kill).
TABLE 2.
In vivo activities of SCY-078 against C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis in a neutropenic murine invasive candidiasis model
| Isolate | Activity measuresa |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emax (log10 CFU/kidney) | 24-h single dose (mg/kg) | 24-h single dose tAUC/MIC | 24-h single dose fAUC/MIC | 24-h 1-log kill dose (mg/kg) | 24-h 1-log kill dose tAUC/MIC | 24-h 1-log kill dose fAUC/MIC | |
| C. albicans | |||||||
| Isolate | |||||||
| K1 | 3.5 | 69.3 | 547.1 | 1.09 | 146.5 | 1078.9 | 2.16 |
| 98-17 | 4.3 | 50.6 | 395.7 | 0.79 | 81.9 | 648.1 | 1.30 |
| 98-210 | 3.5 | 95.3 | 756.3 | 1.51 | |||
| 580 | 4.8 | 38.9 | 302.1 | 0.60 | 51.9 | 406.3 | 0.81 |
| Overall | |||||||
| Mean | 4.0 | 63.5 | 500.3 | 1.00 | 93.4 | 711.1 | 1.42 |
| Median | 3.9 | 59.9 | 471.4 | 0.94 | 81.9 | 648.1 | 1.30 |
| SD | 0.6 | 24.6 | 198.3 | 0.40 | 48.3 | 340.7 | 0.68 |
| C. glabrata | |||||||
| Isolate | |||||||
| 5592 | 4.7 | 55.3 | 54.2 | 0.11 | 130.4 | 122.6 | 0.25 |
| 513 | 4.3 | 45.3 | 176.8 | 0.35 | 138.7 | 515.7 | 1.03 |
| 5376 | 5.2 | 109.7 | 853.6 | 1.71 | 175.2 | 1254.8 | 2.51 |
| 33616 | 1.8 | 23.1 | 174.6 | 0.35 | |||
| Overall | |||||||
| Mean | 4.0 | 58.4 | 314.8 | 0.63 | 148.1 | 631.1 | 1.26 |
| Median | 4.5 | 50.3 | 175.7 | 0.35 | 138.7 | 515.7 | 1.03 |
| SD | 1.5 | 36.8 | 363.7 | 0.73 | 23.8 | 574.9 | 1.15 |
| C. parapsilosis | |||||||
| Isolate | |||||||
| 20519.069 | 4.3 | 48.7 | 47.5 | 0.10 | 116.2 | 111.7 | 0.22 |
| 20477.048 | 4.7 | 127.4 | 240.5 | 0.48 | 354.1 | 587.5 | 1.18 |
| 20423.072 | 4.0 | 77.0 | 304.6 | 0.61 | 187.7 | 665.7 | 1.33 |
| Overall | |||||||
| Mean | 4.3 | 84.4 | 197.5 | 0.40 | 219.3 | 455.0 | 0.91 |
| Median | 4.3 | 77.0 | 240.5 | 0.48 | 187.7 | 587.5 | 1.18 |
| SD | 0.4 | 39.9 | 133.8 | 0.27 | 122.1 | 299.9 | 0.60 |
| All species | |||||||
| Mean | 4.1 | 67.3 | 350.3 | 0.70 | 153.6 | 599.0 | 1.20 |
| Median | 4.3 | 55.3 | 302.1 | 0.60 | 138.7 | 587.5 | 1.18 |
| SD | 0.9 | 32.1 | 267.5 | 0.54 | 86.3 | 383.4 | 0.77 |
tAUC/MIC, total drug AUC/MIC; fAUC/MIC, free drug (non-protein bound) AUC/MIC.
DISCUSSION
The synthesis of glucans in Candida has proven to be an effective drug target through the successful development of the echinocandin antifungal class. In a decade since their clinical introduction, echinocandins have become first-line therapy against Candida isolates in many clinical scenarios due to their broad activity against the commonly encountered Candida species, high potency, and low toxicity (1). As a group, though, they are available only as intravenous formulations. They are very large lipopeptides (∼1,200 kDa) and therefore have inherently very low oral bioavailability. The prevalence of Candida infections and the effectiveness of the echinocandin class make an oral glucan synthase inhibitor an attractive option. This class may assume the previous role of oral fluconazole for step-down therapy prior to the emergence of triazole-resistant infections.
Pharmacodynamic evaluation of echinocandins has been determined in a number of in vivo studies against Candida species (17, 21, 22, 24, 28, 29). Optimal therapeutic efficacy in studies of echinocandins was noted when the Cmax/MIC was 1 to 10 and the AUC/MIC was 10 to 20 when free drug concentrations were considered. In the current study, we noted similar relationships for a novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor, SCY-078. The AUC/MIC was a robust predictor of therapeutic efficacy in the murine neutropenic model of IC, with an R2 ranging from 0.53 to 0.91. The PD targets were numerically lower than those observed with the intravenous echinocandin formulations; a static dose free drug AUC/MIC target ranged from 0.40 to 1.00 (mean for all 11 organisms, 0.70). We also noted in the current study the lack of significant differences in species-specific PD targets which have been demonstrated with the echinocandins (12). Consistent with previous echinocandin results, a trend toward lower targets was observed for C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis in comparison to C. albicans. It is possible that small but potentially significant differences in PD targets do exist and were not demonstrated in the current study due to the limited number of isolates utilized.
Previous SCY-078 in vitro potency studies have demonstrated potency against the most common Candida spp., including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei (30, 31). The MIC90s in these studies ranged from 0.5 to 2 mg/liter. An interesting finding in the study by Pfaller et al., given that the enfumafungin derivatives inhibit glucan synthesis similarly to the echinocandin class, is the retained potency that SCY-078 demonstrates for isolates with FKS1 hot spot mutations that confer echinocandin resistance (30). Thus, oral glucan synthase inhibitors may provide more than just the convenient benefit of oral administration and may also be an additional therapeutic agent for azole and/or echinocandin drug-resistant Candida infections. This is particularly relevant given the emergence of echinocandin resistance and echinocandin/azole coresistance in C. glabrata (32–34).
The ability of preclinical PD studies to predict the efficacy of antimicrobial agents in patients is critical for translating these results to the clinical realm. The relationship between preclinical and clinical efficacy was recently examined for the echinocandin micafungin (35). Using data from two large randomized studies, a free drug AUC/MIC (fAUC/MIC) of >7.5 was significantly associated with clinical success compared to an fAUC/MIC of <7.5 against all Candida species. When examined by species, C. parapsilosis had a significantly lower PD target in this clinical data set, with an fAUC/MIC of 0.7. These clinical PD targets were similar to those identified in the echinocandin animal model studies (12, 17, 21, 24) and are congruent with the targets identified in this study of a novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor. Whether these targets are achievable in humans is dependent on human PK studies and MIC distribution. The analysis of human PK data, MIC distribution, and protein binding data would also allow for the determination of preliminary susceptibility breakpoints based upon these preclinical data. Accordingly, the current in vivo studies demonstrate that SCY-078 stands as a promising oral option for Candida infections, including invasive candidiasis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
These studies were funded by a research grant from Merck.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE Jr, Filler SG, Fisher JF, Kullberg BJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD. 2009. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 48:503–535. doi: 10.1086/596757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pappas PG, Rex JH, Lee J, Hamill RJ, Larsen RA, Powderly W, Kauffman CA, Hyslop N, Mangino JE, Chapman S, Horowitz HW, Edwards JE, Dismukes WE. 2003. A prospective observational study of candidemia: epidemiology, therapy, and influences on mortality in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients. Clin Infect Dis 37:634–643. doi: 10.1086/376906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. 2007. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:133–163. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00029-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bouza E, Munoz P. 2008. Epidemiology of candidemia in intensive care units. Int J Antimicrob Agents 32(Suppl 2):S87–S91. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(08)70006-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Horn DL, Neofytos D, Anaissie EJ, Fishman JA, Steinbach WJ, Olyaei AJ, Marr KA, Pfaller MA, Chang CH, Webster KM. 2009. Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019 patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry. Clin Infect Dis 48:1695–1703. doi: 10.1086/599039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Moet GJ, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2011. Candida bloodstream infections: comparison of species distribution and resistance to echinocandin and azole antifungal agents in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008 to 2009). Int J Antimicrob Agents 38:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chandrasekar PH, Sobel JD. 2006. Micafungin: a new echinocandin. Clin Infect Dis 42:1171–1178. doi: 10.1086/501020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cornely OA, Schmitz K, Aisenbrey S. 2002. The first echinocandin: caspofungin. Mycoses 45(Suppl 3):S56–S60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Denning DW. 2003. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362:1142–1151. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14472-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vazquez JA, Sobel JD. 2006. Anidulafungin: a novel echinocandin. Clin Infect Dis 43:215–222. doi: 10.1086/505204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW, Playford G, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Sobel JD, Pappas PG, Kullberg BJ, Mycoses Study Group . 2012. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis 54:1110–1122. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andes D, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Bohrmuller J, Marchillo K, Lepak A. 2010. In vivo comparison of the pharmacodynamic targets for echinocandin drugs against Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2497–2506. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01584-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lepak A, Castanheira M, Diekema D, Pfaller M, Andes D. 2012. Optimizing echinocandin dosing and susceptibility breakpoint determination via in vivo pharmacodynamic evaluation against Candida glabrata with and without fks mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5875–5882. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01102-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lepak AJ, Marchillo K, VanHecker J, Diekema D, Andes DR. 2013. Isavuconazole pharmacodynamic target determination for Candida species in an in vivo murine disseminated candidiasis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5642–5648. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01354-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 3rd ed. Approved standard M27-A3 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 16.National Research Council. 2011. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th ed. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Andes D, Marchillo K, Lowther J, Bryskier A, Stamstad T, Conklin R. 2003. In vivo pharmacodynamics of HMR 3270, a glucan synthase inhibitor, in a murine candidiasis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1187–1192. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1187-1192.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andes D, Stamsted T, Conklin R. 2001. Pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B in a neutropenic-mouse disseminated-candidiasis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:922–926. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.3.922-926.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Andes D, van Ogtrop M. 1999. Characterization and quantitation of the pharmacodynamics of fluconazole in a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2116–2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Andes D. 2005. Use of an animal model of disseminated candidiasis in the evaluation of antifungal therapy. Methods Mol Med 118:111–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Andes D, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Prince RA, Marchillo K, Ashbeck J, Hou J. 2008. In vivo pharmacodynamic characterization of anidulafungin in a neutropenic murine candidiasis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:539–550. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01061-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gumbo T, Drusano GL, Liu W, Ma L, Deziel MR, Drusano MF, Louie A. 2006. Anidulafungin pharmacokinetics and microbial response in neutropenic mice with disseminated candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3695–3700. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00507-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Louie A, Deziel M, Liu W, Drusano MF, Gumbo T, Drusano GL. 2005. Pharmacodynamics of caspofungin in a murine model of systemic candidiasis: importance of persistence of caspofungin in tissues to understanding drug activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:5058–5068. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.12.5058-5068.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nett JE, Guite KM, Ringeisen A, Holoyda KA, Andes DR. 2008. Reduced biocide susceptibility in Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:3411–3413. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01656-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Groll AH, Candelario M, Sein T, Bell A, Lyman CA, McMillian CL, Bacher J, Walsh TJ. 1999. Antifungal activity of LY303366, a novel echinocandin B, in experimental disseminated candidiasis in rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2148–2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Groll AH, Roussillon K, Hemmings M, Lyman CA, Sein T, Bacher J, Bekersky I, Walsh TJ. 2002. Comparative antifungal activities and plasma pharmacokinetics of micafungin (FK463) against disseminated candidiasis and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:1857–1869. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1857-1869.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Walsh TJ, Lee JW, Kelly P, Bacher J, Lecciones J, Thomas V, Lyman C, Coleman D, Gordee R, Pizzo PA. 1991. Antifungal effects of the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of cilofungin, a 1,3-beta-glucan synthetase inhibitor, during continuous and intermittent intravenous infusions in treatment of experimental disseminated candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:1321–1328. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.7.1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Groll AH, Mickiene D, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Lyman CA, Bacher JS, Piscitelli SC, Walsh TJ. 2001. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of anidulafungin (LY303366): reappraisal of its efficacy in neutropenic animal models of opportunistic mycoses using optimal plasma sampling. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:2845–2855. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2845-2855.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gumbo T, Drusano GL, Liu W, Kulawy RW, Fregeau C, Hsu V, Louie A. 2007. Once-weekly micafungin therapy is as effective as daily therapy for disseminated candidiasis in mice with persistent neutropenia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:968–974. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01337-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Motyl MR, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2013. Activity of MK-3118, a new oral glucan synthase inhibitor, tested against Candida spp. by two international methods (CLSI and EUCAST). J Antimicrob Chemother 68:858–863. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Walker SS, Xu Y, Triantafyllou I, Waldman MF, Mendrick C, Brown N, Mann P, Chau A, Patel R, Bauman N, Norris C, Antonacci B, Gurnani M, Cacciapuoti A, McNicholas PM, Wainhaus S, Herr RJ, Kuang R, Aslanian RG, Ting PC, Black TA. 2011. Discovery of a novel class of orally active antifungal beta-1,3-d-glucan synthase inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5099–5106. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00432-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alexander BD, Johnson MD, Pfeiffer CD, Jimenez-Ortigosa C, Catania J, Booker R, Castanheira M, Messer SA, Perlin DS, Pfaller MA. 2013. Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations. Clin Infect Dis 56:1724–1732. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Lockhart SR, Ahlquist AM, Messer SA, Jones RN. 2012. Frequency of decreased susceptibility and resistance to echinocandins among fluconazole-resistant bloodstream isolates of Candida glabrata. J Clin Microbiol 50:1199–1203. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06112-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Woosley LN, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2013. Echinocandin and triazole antifungal susceptibility profiles for clinical opportunistic yeast and mold isolates collected from 2010 to 2011: application of new CLSI clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values for characterization of geographic and temporal trends of antifungal resistance. J Clin Microbiol 51:2571–2581. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00308-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Andes D, Ambrose PG, Hammel JP, Van Wart SA, Iyer V, Reynolds DK, Buell DN, Kovanda LL, Bhavnani SM. 2011. Use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses to optimize therapy with the systemic antifungal micafungin for invasive candidiasis or candidemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2113–2121. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01430-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

