Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2015 Jan 27;59(2):1048–1051. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04308-14

Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Adults in Zhejiang, China

Zibo Zhou a, Xiangzhi Li a, Xiaojian Chen b, Fangjun Luo c, Changwang Pan a,, Xiaoping Zheng c, Feng Tan a,
PMCID: PMC4335877  PMID: 25451048

Abstract

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a major pathogen causing community-acquired pneumoniae (CAP), which is generally treated with macrolides. In recent years, however, although macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae has been reported frequently, particularly in China, very little is known about the prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection in adults. In this study, we survey the macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae in adults in Zhejiang province and characterize the mechanisms of resistance to macrolide. Six hundred fifty throat swab samples were collected from adult patients with CAP from January 2012 to August 2014. These samples were assayed by nested PCR and then cultivated for M. pneumoniae. All isolates were sequenced to determine the mutation in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. The activities of 10 antibiotics against macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae isolates were also investigated in vitro. Moreover, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the amplified P1 gene was used to type 50 resistant strains. One hundred percent (71/71) of M. pneumoniae strains isolated from adults with CAP were resistant to erythromycin (MIC = 128 to >256 μg/ml), clarithromycin (MIC = 128 to >256 μg/ml), and azithromycin (MIC = 32 to >64 μg/ml). Furthermore, all macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains identified had an A2063G mutation in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. Forty-six resistant strains (92.0%) were classified into type I strain on the basis of P1 gene PCR-RFLP analysis. According to these findings, it is suggested that macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection is very prevalence among adults in Zhejiang province. Thus, there is necessary to perform the epidemiological monitoring of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae in the future.

INTRODUCTION

Mycoplasma pneumoniae remains an important cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and this organism accounts for up to 40% of cases (13). Although most of these infections are asymptomatic or mild, severe bronchopneumonia and lung abscesses are occurring increasingly (4). Furthermore, M. pneumoniae infection may lead to several extrapulmonary conditions, such as myocarditis, pericarditis, meningitis, neuritis, and erythema multiforme, sometimes with a fatal outcome (5, 6). M. pneumoniae infection could occur at any age. However, research on M. pneumoniae infection in adults has lagged behind that in children. Epidemiological studies demonstrate that M. pneumoniae infections account for 20.7% in adults with CAP in China, more than Streptococcus pneumoniae, so M. pneumoniae is the leading pathogen of CAP (7). Therefore, it is important to study M. pneumoniae infection in adults.

Because of the absence of cell walls with M. pneumoniae, macrolide antibiotics are recognized generally as the first-choice agents in clinical treatment (3, 8, 9). However, with the widespread use of the drug, increasing numbers of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae have been reported in the past decade, especially in Asia, Europe, and the United States (6, 1012). In China, the infection rate of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae has reached up to 90% (13, 14).

Specific site mutations in domain V of 23S rRNA of M. pneumoniae may define the macrolide resistance phenotypes. For instance, the mutations that occurred at both positions 2063 and 2064 led to high-level resistance, whereas positions 2067 and 2617 are associated with low-level resistance to macrolides (3, 15, 16). It was confirmed that the resistance of M. pneumoniae to macrolide is mainly caused by mutations in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene, such as A2063G, A2064G, A2063C, A2063T, A2067G, and C2617G, which in turn interfere with the binding of macrolides to rRNA (15, 17). Moreover, a mutation at A2063G is most likely to be present along with these mutations (3, 15, 16).

In this study, 71 M. pneumoniae-positive strains were obtained from 650 throat swab samples to evaluate the prevalence of macrolide resistance of M. pneumoniae among adults in Zhejiang, China, and characterize the mechanisms of resistance. We identified a significantly high prevalence of macrolide resistance in adults and show that this resistance is associated with the A2063G mutation in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. Together, these findings highlight the fact that macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae is a serious problem in Zhejiang of China, and local surveillance may play an important role in providing effective therapy against M. pneumoniae infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

M. pneumoniae strains.

A total of 650 throat swab samples were routinely obtained from adult patients aged from 18 to 82 years with CAP from January 2012 to June 2014 at three hospitals in Zhejiang province (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Yueqing Third People's Hospital, Zhuji People's Hospital), and all studies were approved by the hospital ethics committee. The diagnosis was mainly confirmed based on clinical signs and symptoms (sore throat, cough, fever, productive sputum, chill, chest pain, dyspnea, or pulmonary rales) and pulmonary radiography.

Rapid detection by nested PCR for M. pneumoniae was performed originally using primers based on the P1 gene and methods described previously (18) (Table 1). The M. pneumoniae reference strain FH (ATCC 15531) was used as a PCR-positive control.

TABLE 1.

Primers used in this study

Primer target and name Sequence (5′-3′) Nucleotide position Product size (bp)
P1 adhesin genea
    Mp-F ATTCTCATCCTCACCGCCACC 40–331 285
    Mp-R CGTGGTTTGTTGACTGCCACTGCCG 40–331 285
    Mpn-F CAATGCCATCAACCCGCCCTTAACC 178–285 107
    Mpn-R GTTGTCGCGCACTAAGGCCCACG 178–285 107
23S rRNA geneb
    Mp-F1 GTGCTGGAAGGTTAAAGAAG 1845–2777 933
    Mp-R1 GATAGTTTCACACTTAGATG 1845–2777 933
    Mpn-F1 GAGGTTAGCGCAA GCGAAGC 1865–2206 342
    Mpn-R1 ATTAGAACAGCACACAACCA 1865–2206 342
    Mpn-F2 AAGAGTTCATATCGACGGCAG 2472–2776 303
    Mpn-R2 ATAGTTTCACACTTAGATG 2472–2776 303
a

Talkington et al. (18).

b

Lin et al. (20).

Positive throat swab specimens identified by nested PCR were cultivated in 2.5 ml of PPLO broth for 10 to 14 days at 37°C with 5% CO2. The composition of the medium was as described previously (17). When the color of the broth medium changed from red to yellow by the resulting utilization of glucose, 0.2 ml of the suspension was transferred onto the agar medium. The agar medium was incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 7 to 14 days. Then, a single colony was isolated and subcultivated for three times when typical “fried-egg” colonies on the agar medium were observed under a stereomicroscope. The obtained M. pneumoniae strains were identified by nested PCR targeting the P1 gene.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of M. pneumoniae.

To determine the MICs of 10 antibiotics for M. pneumoniae isolates, the microdilution method with pleuropneumonia-like organism (PPLO) broth was performed as described previously (19). These agents are divided into three categories: macrolides (erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, josamycin, and rokitamycin), tetracyclines (doxycycline and minocycline), and fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and gatifloxacin). Every antimicrobial susceptibility test was repeated three times. M. pneumoniae reference strain FH (ATCC 15531) was used as a drug-sensitive control.

DNA sequencing.

Amplification of domain V of the 23S rRNA gene were performed by nested PCR using primers described by Lin et al. (20) (Table 1). All of the nested PCR products, including the reference strain, were sequenced (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The DNA sequences were compared to that of M. pneumoniae strain FH (GenBank accession no. CP002077.1) by BLAST. These experiments were performed for three times.

PCR-RFLP typing of the P1 gene.

PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was performed to type 50 macrolide-resistant strains as described previously (21). Briefly, a fragment of P1 adhesin gene was amplified with the primers ADH1 and ADH2 (21) and then digested with HaeIII restriction endonuclease (NEB, Shanghai, China). The digested samples were analyzed on a 1.2% agarose gel.

RESULTS

Clinical isolates of M. pneumoniae.

A total of 145 (22.3%) M. pneumoniae-positive samples were obtained from 650 samples by nested PCR targeting of the P1 adhesion gene. Cultivation for M. pneumoniae with PPLO broth and agar was performed further in the 145 PCR-positive samples, and 71 strains were isolated (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

M. pneumoniae isolated from three hospitals in Zhejiang, China

Hospital Total no. of samples No. of macrolide-resistant samples
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University 300 35
Yueqing Third People's Hospital 210 27
Zhuji People's Hospital 140 9
Total 650 71

Antimicrobial susceptibility.

Compared to the in vitro activities of the M. pneumoniae reference strains listed in Table 3, all 71 clinical isolates showed a significantly increase in the degree of MICs against macrolides and resistance to erythromycin and clarithromycin with MICs of >128 μg/ml. The MIC of azithromycin (32 to >64 μg/ml) was lower than that of erythromycin and clarithromycin. The 16-member macrolides rokitamycin and josamycin were more effective than the 14- and 15-member macrolides, and rokitamycin (0.064 to 1 μg/ml) had a more effective MIC than did josamycin (1 to 8 μg/ml).

TABLE 3.

MICs of 10 antibiotics against M. pneumoniae clinical strains and the FH strain

Isolate groupa MIC (μg/ml)b
ERY CLR AZM JOS RKI MIN DOX LVX CIP GAT
Clinical isolates (A2063G) 128 to >256 128 to >256 32 to >64 1 to 8 0.064 to 1 0.031 to 1 0.125 to 1 0.25 to 2 0.5 to 2 0.016 to 0.125
Reference strain FH 0.016 0.008 0.002 0.063 0.01 0.031 0.063 0.5 1 0.125
a

As characterized by mutation in the 23S rRNA gene.

b

Abbreviations: ERY, erythromycin; CLR, clarithromycin; AZM, azithromycin; JOS, josamycin; RKI, rokitamycin; DOX, doxycycline; MIN, minocycline; LVX, levofloxacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; GAT, gatifloxacin. MIC ranges are given for the clinical iolates.

All of the clinical isolates, as well as M. pneumoniae reference strains, were susceptible to the tetracyclines (doxycycline and minocycline) and fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and gatifloxacin) in this study. Gatifloxacin, in particular, with an MIC of 0.016 to 0.125 μg/ml was more active than both levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin.

Sequencing analysis of 23S rRNA genes.

All 71 macrolide-resistant clinical strains harbored the A2063G mutation in domain V of 23S rRNA genes. Neither a position 2064 nor a position 2617 site mutation in 23S rRNA gene was observed. In addition, a deletion that occurred at 2018A was found in both 71 clinical strains and the M. pneumoniae reference strain, which indicates that the 2018A deletion does not correlate with macrolide resistance.

PCR-RFLP typing of the P1 gene.

A total of 46 (92.0%) resistant strains were classified as type I on the basis of P1 gene PCR-RFLP analysis, indicating that type I strains were predominant among the tested resistant strains.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study about the evaluation of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection in adults in Zhejiang, China. During the study period, we found a high rate of resistance to macrolides for M. pneumoniae in adults, and this resistance is associated with the A2063G mutation in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. Furthermore, the PCR-RFLP results indicated that type I strain was predominant among the resistant strains (92.0%).

M. pneumoniae is one of the most common causes of CAP and leads to about 2 to 30% of CAP in adults (7, 22). In the present study, M. pneumoniae infection was identified by nested PCR assay in adult patients. The results showed that 22.3% (175/650) of adults with CAP were infected with M. pneumoniae. It is well known that PCR technology is a rapid, easy, accurate method for early diagnosis of M. pneumoniae (2325). Among PCR methods, nested PCR have remarkable advantages over traditional PCR, including superior sensitivity and specificity, because of involvement of the reamplification of a PCR product with a second set of primers (23). Our findings are in agreement with other studies and suggest that nested PCR assess should be considered the preferred method for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection.

Macrolides usually are used as the first-line choice therapeutic agent for the treatment of M. pneumoniae infections in both children and adults (3). In our study, the resistance rate to macrolides was extremely high in Zhejiang, China, because all M. pneumoniae strains isolated from adult patients showed resistance to macrolides. In 2000, the first macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strain was isolated in Japan (19). Since then, the frequency of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae cases has increased rapidly throughout the world, including Europe, eastern Asia, and the Americas (6). Between 2002 and 2008, a progressive increase in macrolide resistance from 5 to 39% among M. pneumoniae isolates was observed in Japan and even reached 87% in a recent year (3, 26, 27). Several Chinese studies reported a higher proportion of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains, ranging 63 to 92% (13, 2830), obtained between 2003 and 2012 from patients with respiratory tract infections. Although it has been reported that the prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae is relatively lower in Europe and the United States, ranging from 3.6% in Germany (31) to 25.6% in Italy (2), the rate of resistance has also increased in these areas. For instance, Peuchant et al. (10) reported that the resistance rate increased from 0% before 2005 to 9.8% in 2007 in France. In the United States, the resistance rate also increased from 5% in 2008 to 8.2% in 2012 (12). Obviously, macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae is spreading sharply throughout the world, especially in eastern Asia. In our study, the prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae is particularly severe in adults in Zhejiang, China, and poses a great challenge to the selection of appropriate antibiotics for the treatment of M. pneumoniae infection. This is most likely attributed to the widespread empirical use of macrolides for respiratory tract infections.

Macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae is highly relevant to mutations in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. In particular, the point mutation in the peptidyl transferase region of 23S rRNA was considered the main mechanism of macrolide resistance because the mutation blocks the capacity of macrolides to bind the 23S rRNA components of the ribosome (15, 17). The A2063G mutation is recognized as the most prevalent mutation, followed by A2064G. Other mutation types—such as A2063C, A2063T, C2617A and A2067G—are rare (3, 15). In our study, a total of 71 macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains harbored an A-to-G transition mutation at position 2063 of the 23S rRNA gene. We found no isolates with the locus 2064 or 2617 mutation. Based on our results, the A2063G transitions are responsible for high-level resistance to 14- and 15-member ring macrolides, such as erythromycin (128 to >256 μg/ml), clarithromycin (128 to >256 μg/ml), and azithromycin (32 to >64 μg/ml) in M. pneumoniae. However, 16-member ring macrolides, such as josamycin and rokitamycin, retained activity, with MICs of ≤1 μg/ml, against clinical strains with the A2063G mutation. The data from the susceptibility test also revealed that all of the M. pneumoniae isolates were sensitive to tetracyclines (doxycycline and minocycline) and fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and gatifloxacin). The new fluoroquinolone gatifloxacin, with MIC of 0.016 to 0.125 μg/ml, was more active than levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Taken together, these findings suggest that these antibiotics might be used as alternative medicines for the treatment of M. pneumoniae infection in cases of high macrolide resistance in Zhejiang, China.

In conclusion, macrolide resistance of M. pneumoniae in Zhejiang, China, was at a high level among adult patients, and a A2063G transition in domain V of 23S rRNA was found in all macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae isolates. All adult patients infected with macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae can treated with fluoroquinolones or minocycline instead of macrolides. This finding also highlights the fact that local surveillance would be significant in determining the prevalence of macrolide resistance among M. pneumoniae strains and may provide important information regarding effective therapy for M. pneumoniae infections.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by Social Development Program of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province of China (grant 2011C13040).

We declare that the experiments performed and described here comply with the current laws of the People's Republic of China.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wu HM, Wong KS, Huang YC, Lai SH, Tsao KC, Lin YJ, Lin TY. 2013. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children in Taiwan. J Infect Chemother 19:782–786. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0523-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chironna M, Sallustio A, Esposito S, Perulli M, Chinellato I, Di Bari C, Quarto M, Cardinale F. 2011. Emergence of macrolide-resistant strains during an outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:734–737. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Principi N, Esposito S. 2013. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae: its role in respiratory infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:506–511. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li X, Atkinson TP, Hagood J, Makris C, Duffy LB, Waites KB. 2009. Emerging macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children: detection and characterization of resistant isolates. Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:693–696. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31819e3f7a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Atkinson TP, Balish MF, Waites KB. 2008. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and laboratory detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:956–973. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li SL, Sun HM, Zhao HQ, Cao L, Yuan Y, Feng YL, Xue GH. 2012. A single tube modified allele-specific-PCR for rapid detection of erythromycin-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Beijing. Chin Med J (Engl) 125:2671–2676. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.15.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cao B, Zhao CJ, Yin YD, Zhao F, Song SF, Bai L, Zhang JZ, Liu YM, Zhang YY, Wang H, Wang C. 2010. High prevalence of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates from adult and adolescent patients with respiratory tract infection in China. Clin Infect Dis 51:189–194. doi: 10.1086/653535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wolff BJ, Thacker WL, Schwartz SB, Winchell JM. 2008. Detection of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae by real-time PCR and high-resolution melt analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:3542–3549. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00582-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qu J, Gu L, Wu J, Dong J, Pu Z, Gao Y, Hu M, Zhang Y, Gao F, Cao B, Wang C. 2013. Accuracy of IgM antibody testing, FQ-PCR and culture in laboratory diagnosis of acute infection by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in adults and adolescents with community-acquired pneumonia. BMC Infect Dis 13:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peuchant O, Menard A, Renaudin H, Morozumi M, Ubukata K, Bebear CM, Pereyre S. 2009. Increased macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in France directly detected in clinical specimens by real-time PCR and melting curve analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:52–58. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morozumi M, Iwata S, Hasegawa K, Chiba N, Takayanagi R, Matsubara K, Nakayama E, Sunakawa K, Ubukata K. 2008. Increased macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:348–350. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00779-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yamada M, Buller R, Bledsoe S, Storch GA. 2012. Rising rates of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the central United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J 31:409–400. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318247f3e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhao F, Liu G, Wu J, Cao B, Tao X, He L, Meng F, Zhu L, Lv M, Yin Y, Zhang J. 2013. Surveillance of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Beijing, China, from 2008 to 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1521–1523. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02060-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu Y, Ye X, Zhang H, Xu X, Li W, Zhu D, Wang M. 2009. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates and molecular analysis of macrolide-resistant strains from Shanghai, China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2160–2162. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01684-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bebear CM, Pereyre S. 2005. Mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord 5:263–271. doi: 10.2174/1568005054880109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bebear C, Pereyre S, Peuchant O. 2011. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics. Future Microbiol 6:423–431. doi: 10.2217/fmb.11.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Suzuki Y, Itagaki T, Seto J, Kaneko A, Abiko C, Mizuta K, Matsuzaki Y. 2013. Community outbreak of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Yamagata, Japan in 2009. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32:237–240. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31827aa7bd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Talkington DF, Thacker WL, Keller DW, Jensen JS. 1998. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in autopsy and open-lung biopsy tissues by nested PCR. J Clin Microbiol 36:1151–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Okazaki N, Narita M, Yamada S, Izumikawa K, Umetsu M, Kenri T, Sasaki Y, Arakawa Y, Sasaki T. 2001. Characteristics of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains isolated from patients and induced with erythromycin in vitro. Microbiol Immunol 45:617–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2001.tb01293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin C, Li S, Sun H, Zhao H, Feng Y, Cao L, Yuan Y, Zhang T. 2010. Nested PCR-linked capillary electrophoresis and single-strand conformation polymorphisms for detection of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Beijing, China. J Clin Microbiol 48:4567–4572. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00400-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cousin-Allery A, Charron A, de Barbeyrac B, Fremy G, Skov JJ, Renaudin H, Bebear C. 2000. Molecular typing of Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains by PCR-based methods and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Application to French and Danish isolates. Epidemiol Infect 124:103–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gutierrez F, Masia M, Rodriguez JC, Mirete C, Soldan B, Padilla S, Hernandez I, Royo G, Martin-Hidalgo A. 2005. Community-acquired pneumonia of mixed etiology: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24:377–383. doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-1346-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Daxboeck F, Krause R, Wenisch C. 2003. Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 9:263–273. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Loens K, Ursi D, Goossens H, Ieven M. 2003. Molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 41:4915–4923. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.4915-4923.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nilsson AC, Bjorkman P, Persson K. 2008. Polymerase chain reaction is superior to serology for the diagnosis of acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and reveals a high rate of persistent infection. BMC Microbiol 8:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Morozumi M, Takahashi T, Ubukata K. 2010. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae: characteristics of isolates and clinical aspects of community-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Chemother 16:78–86. doi: 10.1007/s10156-009-0021-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Okada T, Morozumi M, Tajima T, Hasegawa M, Sakata H, Ohnari S, Chiba N, Iwata S, Ubukata K. 2012. Rapid effectiveness of minocycline or doxycycline against macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in a 2011 outbreak among Japanese children. Clin Infect Dis 55:1642–1649. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ma Z, Zheng Y, Deng J, Ma X, Liu H. 2014. Characterization of macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children in Shenzhen, China. Pediatr Pulmonol 49:695–700. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu Y, Ye X, Zhang H, Xu X, Li W, Zhu D, Wang M. 2010. Characterization of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolated from children in Shanghai, China. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 67:355–358. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xin D, Mi Z, Han X, Qin L, Li J, Wei T, Chen X, Ma S, Hou A, Li G, Shi D. 2009. Molecular mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae from China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2158–2159. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01563-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dumke R, Luck C, Jacobs E. 2013. Low rate of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains in Germany between 2009 and 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3460. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00706-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES