Skip to main content
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports logoLink to International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
. 2015 Jan 8;7:89–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.01.004

Surgical management of haemorrhaging renal angiomyolipoma in pregnancy

P Preece a,, B Mees b,c, B Norris a, M Christie d, T Wagner c, P Dundee a
PMCID: PMC4336430  PMID: 25598402

Highlights

  • We report the case of a 25-week pregnant woman that had a ruptured AML.

  • This is the first case of nephrectomy in late second trimester with the foetus left in-utero.

  • We present a literature review of the management of bleeding AML in pregnancy.

Keywords: Angiomyolipoma, Pregnancy, Haemorrhage, Nephrectomy, Therapeutic embolisation

Abstract

Introduction

Renal angiomyolipoma (AML) is a benign mesenchymal tumour of the kidney with a tendency of aneurysm formation at risk of rupturing. Due to increased maternal circulation and hormonal influences, rupture risk is greater in pregnancy, often leading to a vascular emergency and premature delivery or termination.

Presentation of case

A 24-weeks pregnant woman (45 years old, G6P1) presented with haematuria and flank pain. CT showed AML with acute haemorrhage. The patient became haemodynamically unstable and underwent urgent embolisation and follow-on total radical nephrectomy with the foetus being left in-utero. This involved a multidisciplinary team (urologist, vascular surgeon, interventional radiologist and obstetrician). The procedure was uncomplicated and the pregnancy went to term with a healthy girl delivered at 38 weeks.

Discussion

The incidence of AML is 0.13% in the general population. 21 reports of haemorrhaging AML in pregnancy have been published in the last 35 years. Mean gestational age was 29.6 weeks. Eight were treated conservatively to term, one underwent exploratory laparotomy with evacuation of haematoma only, five were embolised, and seven were managed with nephrectomy. Of the nephrectomy subgroup, one was preceded by vaginal delivery and five underwent concurrent caesarean section (one with pre-op embolisation). There were two associated foetal deaths.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates that with a multidisciplinary approach, it is possible to successfully leave a foetus undelivered whilst performing a radical nephrectomy for a large bleeding AML in a woman carrying a late second trimester pregnancy.

1. Presentation of case:

A 45 year-old female in her 24th week of pregnancy (G6P1) presented to a women’s specialty hospital with right-sided flank pain and haematuria. Her medical history consisted of four first trimester miscarriages, an emergency caesarean section, non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and iron deficiency anaemia.

Abdominal examination revealed a ballotable right upper quadrant mass. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) (Figs. 1 and 2) demonstrated a large renal angiomyolipoma (AML) (15 × 14 × 13 cm) with a 2.3 cm intra-capsular false aneurysm and surrounding haematoma. No other hallmark signs were found to suggest Tuberous Sclerosis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

3D reconstruction showing relationship of AML and foetus.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(A) Ultrasound: 3.8 × 3.3cm false aneurysm in AML with surrounding hyperechoic haematoma. (B) Axial CTA: Classic CT findings of right AML, a heterogenous mass with apredominence of fat (−20 HU) and intersperesed tissue density (muscular andvascular elements). 4.5% of AMLs are a ‘minimal fat’ subtype which impedes the reliability of CT diagnosis [7]. Large false aneurysm arrowed. (C) Coronal CTA: Haemorrhage and largefalse aneurysm within right AML, incidental left AML. (D) Digital Subtraction Angiogram: Embolised proximal right renal artery.

Multidisciplinary management was initiated involving Obstetricians, Urologists, Vascular Surgeons and Interventional Radiologists. As the patients’ condition had stabilised and given the substantial risks associated with premature birth before 26 weeks, consensus was for conservative management until 28 weeks of pregnancy at which time an elective concurrent caesarean section and nephrectomy would be performed. The patient was managed as an inpatient to allow for continued monitoring. Antenatal corticosteroids were administered.

Ten days following the herald bleed, the patient developed new onset frank haematuria and crescendo flank pain. She became increasingly tachycardic and her haemoglobin decreased from 110 g/L to 90 g/L (reference range 115–150), prompting blood transfusion. Foetal observations were unchanged. The patients’ haemodynamic instability, likely due to rupture of the intra-parenchymal false aneurysm, drove a decision to proceed with emergency surgery.

Due to the vascular nature of the tumour, an effort was made to minimise the risk of catastrophic bleeding through urgent pre-operative angio-embolisation. To curtail radiation exposure no screening over the groin or pelvis was performed, the field of view was tightly coned to the right renal artery and injections minimised. Using endovascular plugs the interventional radiology team occluded the proximal right renal artery (Fig. 2) before direct transfer to the operating theatre. A right-sided radical nephrectomy was performed through a chevron incision. Severe haemorrhage remained a risk given the need to mobilise a large, friable vascular mass in a confined operating space restricted by a gravid uterus. Therefore the approach was to minimise mobilisation of the tumour until the inferior vena cava (IVC) was side clamped and the renal vein ligated and divided from the IVC. Gerota’s fascia was left intact. Given a gestational age of only 25 weeks, the foetus was not delivered and no intra-operative foetal monitoring was performed. An obstetrician nonetheless remained on standby in case of an unanticipated emergency. Estimated intra-operative blood loss was 400 mL.

The procedure was uncomplicated and the patient made an uneventful recovery. Histopathology confirmed AML with a benign deposit of tumour in a local lymph node (Fig. 3). She was discharged on day nine post-procedure and a healthy girl was carried to term, delivered at 38 weeks by an elective caesarean section.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Scale bars = 200 μm A. Macro: Circumscribed mass arising from kidney with focal haemorrhage. B. H and E stain: Blood vessels, spindle cells and mature adipocytes. C. AML deposit in a lymph node.

2. Literature review and discussion

AML is the most common benign mesenchymal tumour of the kidney, and consists of smooth muscle-, adipose- and vascular tissue in varying amounts depending on the subtype [1]. The prevalence of AML in the general population approaches 0.13%, with a female to male gender ratio of 4.5:1 [2]. AMLs occur in two distinct ways, either sporadically or in association with Tuberous Sclerosis (TS). Approximately 50% of people with TS have AMLs [3], and in this cohort the tumours are usually small, multiple and bilateral. Although rare, AMLs can result in Wunderlichs syndrome [4]; the spontaneous rupture of renal parenchyma with retroperitoneal haemorrhage. The classically described triad associated with this is a palpable mass, flank pain and haemorrhagic shock.

AMLs have a greater tendency to increase in size and rupture during pregnancy. It is suggested that this higher risk is due to ubiquitous expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in AMLs [5], an increased maternal circulation and potentially the greater intra-abdominal pressures associated with pregnancy.

Using the Medline database, a review of the literature was conducted exploring management and outcomes of ruptured AML in pregnancy (Table 1) No limit was imposed on dates and keywords included ‘angiomyolipoma; pregnancy; haemorrhage and rupture.’ Articles lacking abstracts were excluded. 21 case-reports were identified over a 35-year period: 16 in English; two in Japanese; two in Spanish and one in French. The mean age of the mother was 30.8 years with a mean gestation of 29.6 weeks. Only 14.3% (3) of patients were known to have Tuberous Sclerosis and just one patient had a tumour size less than four centimetres in diameter. 76.2% (16) of patients had pain as a presenting symptom; 19% (4) had frank haematuria; a further 14.3% (3) had microscopic haematuria and 42.1% (8) were in shock. Just 9.5% (2) of patients presented with a palpable mass. Throughout the pregnancy; eight patients were treated conservatively; five were managed with angio-embolisation; one had an exploratory laparotomy with evacuation of haematoma only and seven underwent nephrectomy (one with pre-operative embolisation). In the nephrectomy subgroup; one woman underwent a vaginal delivery before puerperal rupture of an AML; whilst the majority of patients (five) underwent concurrent caesarean section with two associated foetal deaths. Only one other case; (Nicola et al., 2007) [6] was identified in which the foetus was left undelivered and carried to term. This involved a 15-week pregnancy and an AML measuring 7.5 × 10 cm. In comparison; our case concerned a 25-week pregnant woman with a 13 × 13 × 12.5 cm AML. This case demonstrates that it is possible to successfully perform a radical nephrectomy for a large bleeding AML at a more advanced gestational age than previously known. This was potentially due to good haemorrhage control with pre-operative arterial embolisation and minimal handling of the tumour until the renal vein was ligated and divided from the IVC.

Table 1.

Literature review of bleeding AML in pregnancy.

First author Journals Years Maternal age Gestation Foetal distress Shock Treatment Pregnancy
1 Gallagher Obstet. Gynecol. 1978 25 40 Yes Yes N CS, FD
2 Atalla J. R. Army Med. Corps 1987 39 40 No Yes N VD
3 Lee J. Reprod. Med. 1994 29 27 Yes Yes N CS, FD
4 Yanai Urol. Int. 1996 31 29 No No C CT (CS)
5 Oka Hinyokika Kiyo 1999 32 36 No No N CS
6 Khaitan Urol. Int. 2001 25 37 . . E CT (VD)
7 Tanaka Obstet. Gynecol. 2001 23 27 No No C CT (VD)
8 Morales Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2005 28 10 No No E CT (VD)
9 Storm Obstet. Gynecol. 2006 32 39 No No C VD
10 Gimeno Argente Actas Urol Esp 2006 40 33 Yes Yes N CS
11 Raft Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2006 40 34 Yes Yes L CS
12 Al-Ateeqi Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2007 31 32 No Yes C CS
13 Koh J. Reprod. Med. 2007 31 12 No No C CS
14 Nicola Arch Ital Urol Androl 2007 37 15 No Yes N CT
15 Kontos Cases J. 2008 28 33 Yes Yes N CS
16 Binkowska Ginekol. Pol. 2009 26 20 No No E CT (CS)
17 Illescas Molina Ginecol. Obstet. Mex. 2009 36 28 No No C CT (CS)
18 Komeya Hinyokika Kiyo 2010 39 38 . . E CS
19 Gyimadu J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2011 21 25 No No C CT (CS)
20 Zapardiel Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2011 30 35 Yes No E CS
21 Iruloh J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013 23 31 No No C CT (CS)
22 Preece Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2014 45 25 No Yes N CT (CS)

AML treatment N = hrectomy, E = embolisation, C = conservative, L = exploratory laparotomy without nephrectomy pregnancy management: CS = caeserean section, VD = vaginal delivery, CT = Controlled to term, FD = associated foetal death.

Bleeding AML in pregnancy is a rare and complex vascular surgical emergency and should be managed in a multidisciplinary team. Management is largely influenced by the haemodynamic stability of the mother, gestational age, presence or absence of foetal distress and the ready availability of facilities such as an angiography suite, operating theatre and neonatal intensive care. For haemodynamically stable patients, with no evidence of ongoing haemorrhage or signs of foetal distress, conservative management can be safely performed. However, the patient should remain in a monitored environment with a view to proceeding to more definitive management should circumstances require it. For patients in shock, or in those with ongoing haemorrhage, definitive treatment is required by embolisation and/or nephrectomy. Suitability of tumour embolisation, local expertise and resources should determine the treatment technique, however both treatments have shown favourable results. Foetal distress or a mature gestation may make nephrectomy more favourable as it allows for concurrent delivery.

In our case of a haemodynamically unstable patient with a premature foetus not in distress, a multidisciplinary approach resulted in successful nephrectomy without concurrent delivery, allowing the pregnancy to proceed to term.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Funding

No funding was sourced.

Ethical approval

The patient who is the subject of this case report gave consent to write up and publish her story. All personal information has been de-identified. The ethical principles of the Helinski Decleration were adhered to.

Author contribution

Preece – Primary author, literature review.

Mees – Vascular surgeon, second author, chief editor.

Norris – Urology trainee, literature review.

Christie – Pathologist, graphics + expert comment.

Wagner – Vascular surgeon, editor.

Dundee – Urologist, supervising author, editor.

Guarantor

Patrick Preece, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Preece.patrick@gmail.com, Tel.: +61409012512.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Key learning points

  • Ruptured AML is a rare occurrence, although the incidence is higher in pregnancy.

  • Management of this vascular emergency is complex and involves consideration of mother, foetus, the available resources and local expertise.

  • Previous case reports have shown that conservative management is safe in stable patients, whilst angio-embolisation or nephrectomy with concurrent caesarean section have been performed successfully in women with ongoing bleeding.

  • This case report shows that it is also possible to perform a radical nephrectomy with pre-operative angio-embolisation in a 25-week pregnant woman with a haemorrhaging AML, leaving the foetus undelivered and allowing it to reach term in-utero.

  • A multidisciplinary surgical team is appropriate to manage these patients.

References

  • 1.Esheba Gel S., Esheba Nel S. Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. J. Egypt. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013;3:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jnci.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eble J.N. Angiomyolipoma of kidney. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 1998;15(1):21–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cook J.A., Oliver K., Mueller R.F., Sampson J. A cross sectional study of renal involvement in tuberous sclerosis. J. Med. Genet. 1996;6:480–484. doi: 10.1136/jmg.33.6.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marino G., Pedalino M., Di Primio O.G., Piras D., Vella R., Verces E. Wunderlich syndrome. Clinical and therapeutic aspects of a long-term experience. Urologia. 2010;3:193–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boorjian S.A., Sheinin Y., Crispen P.L., Lohse C.M., Kwon E.D., Leibovich B.C. Hormone receptor expression in renal angiomyolipoma: clinicopathologic correlation. Urology. 2008;4:927–932. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nicola M., Gulfi G., Milanesi S., De Luca F. Spontaneous rupture of renal angiomyolipoma in pregnancy at 15 weeks gestation. Archivio Italiano di Urologia, Andrologia. 2007;4:179–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Halpenny D., Snow A., McNeill G., Torreggiani W.C. The radiological diagnosis and treatment of renal angiomyolipoma-current status. Clin. Radiol. 2010;65(2):99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES