Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1973 Aug;70(8):2261–2265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.8.2261

Theoretical Investigations of Automimicry: Multiple Trial Learning and the Palatability Spectrum*

F Harvey Pough , Lincoln P Brower §,, Harold R Meck , Stephen R Kessell §
PMCID: PMC433714  PMID: 16592103

Abstract

We previously explored automimicry assuming that a species of prey was so unpalatable as to promote conditioned avoidance for a period of time after a predator encountered a single individual (Case 1). In this paper, we assume that the prey is less noxious and that two encounters are required. Case 2 allows the two encounters with unpalatables to be separated by any number of palatables, while in Case 3 the predator must encounter two unpalatables, consecutively.

The general relationships in the three cases are similar, but the automimetic advantage is reduced moderately in Case 2 and greatly in Case 3. To attain the same automimetic advantage as in Case 1 requires an increase in the proportion of unpalatables, or in the induced rejection period, or both. Consequently, selection will tend to increase the unpalatability so that Cases 2 and 3 converge to Case 1.

Species that are uniformly and highly unpalatable can afford to be more dispersed than automimetic species. Case-2 and -3 automimetic species will benefit greatly from gregariousness, while in Case-1 automimicry situations this is less important.

Keywords: unpalatable, predator, gregariousness, prey

Full text

PDF
2261

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brower L. P., McEvoy P. B., Williamson K. L., Flannery M. A. Variation in cardiac glycoside content of monarch butterflies from natural populations in eastern North America. Science. 1972 Aug 4;177(4047):426–428. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4047.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brower L. P., Pough F. H., Meck H. R. Theoretical investigations of automimicry, I. Single trial learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Aug;66(4):1059–1066. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.4.1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brower L. P., van Brower J., Corvino J. M. Plant poisons in a terrestrial food chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Apr;57(4):893–898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DUNCAN C. J., SHEPPARD P. M. CONTINUOUS AND QUANTAL THEORIES OF SENSORY DISCRIMINATION. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1963 Oct 22;158:343–363. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1963.0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duncan C. J., Sheppard P. M. Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of Batesian mimicry. Behaviour. 1965;24(3):270–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES