Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Gene Ther. 2014 Nov 14;21(11):483–490. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2014.54

Measles Edmonston Vaccine Strain Derivatives have Potent Oncolytic Activity against Osteosarcoma

Evidio Domingo Musibay a,b, Cory Allen b, Cheyne Kurokawa b, Jayson J Hardcastle b, Ileana Aderca b, Pavlos Msaouel c, Aditya Bansal d, Huailei Jiang d, Timothy R DeGrado d, Evanthia Galanis a,b
PMCID: PMC4337839  NIHMSID: NIHMS630109  PMID: 25394505

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumor affecting children and young adults, and development of metastatic disease is associated with poor prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of virotherapy with engineered measles virus (MV) vaccine strains in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Cell lines derived from pediatric patients with osteosarcoma (HOS, MG63, 143B, KHOS-312H, U2-OS and SJSA1) were examined for MV-GFP and MV-NIS gene expression and cytotoxicity as defined by syncytial formation, cell death, and eradication of cell monolayers: significant antitumor activity was demonstrated. Findings were correlated with in vivo efficacy in subcutaneous, orthotopic (tibial bone), and lung metastatic osteosarcoma xenografts treated with the MV derivative MV-NIS via the intratumoral (IT) or intravenous (IV) route. Following treatment, we observed decrease in tumor growth of subcutaneous xenografts (p=0.0374) and prolongation of survival in mice with orthotopic (p<0.0001) and pulmonary metastatic osteosarcoma tumors (p=0.0207). Expression of the NIS transgene in MV-NIS infected tumors allowed for SPECT-CT and PET-CT imaging of virus infected tumors in vivo. Our data support the translational potential of MV-based virotherapy approaches in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic osteosarcoma.

Keywords: Measles virus, MV-NIS, oncolytic virus, virotherapy, osteosarcoma

Introduction

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy effecting children and young adults, and comprises roughly 5% of childhood cancers and 20% of all bone tumors. Classical osteosarcoma usually arises from the medullary cavity of the metaphyseal growth plates of developing long bones, areas of rapid bone growth and turnover in children and adolescents. Histologically, cells are characterized by the production of osteoid matrix, as well as complex chromosomal karyotypes.1, 2

Despite advances in combined modality treatment including chemotherapy and surgical techniques, which result in cure in 60%–75% of patients,3 roughly one-third of young patients recur or develop metastatic disease or metastasis to the lungs. Long term survival for patients with metastatic disease is <20%.4 There has been little improvement in survival during the last 20 years, and new therapeutic approaches are needed.

Oncolytic measles virus (MV) therapy is a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of cancer.5 Interest in this approach was triggered by observation of spontaneous regressions of leukemias and lymphomas in developing countries after infection with wild-type virus dating back to the 1970s.6, 7 In contrast to wild type virus MV vaccine strains are safe.8 They have been shown to have therapeutic efficacy in several animal models and have demonstrated early evidence of biologic efficacy in human clinical trials.914 MV is a negative single-stranded RNA virus, which belongs to the family of Paramyxoviridae: the virus has 6 genes encoding 8 proteins. Once inside the host, MV interacts with cellular receptors through its surface H glycoprotein. The cell surface receptors include signaling lymphocyte-activating molecule (SLAM) predominantly found on activated B and T lymphocytes, CD46, an inhibitory complement receptor ubiquitously expressed on all human nucleated cells,15 and Nectin-4.16 Of note vaccine strains have been adapted to preferentially enter cells via CD46 as opposed to the SLAM receptor.17, 18 Furthermore, CD46 and Nectin-4 are overexpressed in tumors,19, 20 thus conferring tumor specificity. Additional advantages of this oncolytic platform include the fact that MV strains can be engineered and retargeted to different cellular receptors.21 RNA viruses, including MV-Edm, are potent inducers of an antiviral, interferon mediated, response in normal tissue. Since many tumor cells have defects in interferon signaling, this increases oncolytic viral selectivity for tumors.22, 23

We hypothesized that measles virotherapy could represent a novel therapeutic direction in the treatment of refractory osteosarcoma and we tested the potency of engineered MV-strains against osteosarcoma lines and xenografts. In order to monitor viral propagation, a MV Edmonston strain encoding the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) gene was chosen for these experiments. While NIS is normally expressed on follicular thyroid cells, it can also be used as an imaging transgene to monitor viral infection. Expressed NIS co-transports two sodium ions and an iodide ion into cells, with sodium gradients driving cellular uptake.24 This allows use of gamma camera, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), or positron emission tomography (PET) CT for in vivo monitoring of viral replication following administration of 123I, 99mTc isotopes or F-18 tetrafluoroborate (F-18 TFB).2427.

In this study we demonstrated significant antitumor efficacy of MV derivatives (including MV-NIS and MV-GFP) against osteosarcoma lines and xenografts. Expression of NIS in MV infected cells resulted in effective tumor cell uptake of 99mTc and F-18 TFB for in vivo monitoring of virus infection by SPECT and PET-CT. Moreover, we demonstrated that treatment of athymic nude xenografts with MV-NIS resulted in statistically significant decrease in the growth of orthotopic tumors, and conferred a significant survival advantage in mice bearing orthotopic tibial bone or metastatic pulmonary tumors.

Materials

Cell Culture

HOS, MG63, 143B, KHOS-312H, U2OS, and SJSA1 osteosarcoma cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA). SJSA1 cells were grown in RPMI and all other cells in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1× penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were kept at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

MV Strains

Construction of measles virus expressing green fluorescent protein (MV-GFP) and the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) protein (MV-NIS) has been previously described.25, 28 The viruses were propagated in Vero cells and titrated as previously described.26

Determination of CD46 and Nectin-4 Expression by Flow Cytometry

Cells were grown to confluence in T75 flasks, washed with PBS, and harvested in Versene solution (Gibco). Cells were washed twice with 0.5% BSA-PBS, and incubated with FITC conjugated mouse antihuman CD46 antibody (BD Pharmingen), PE conjugated mouse antihuman Nectin-4 (R&D Systems), or the conjugated isotype control antibody for 1 h on ice. Samples were washed twice with 0.5% BSA-PBS, fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde and run on a Becton-Dickinson FACScan Plus cytometer, Flowingsoftware was used for .fcs file analysis.

Cell viability Assays

HOS, MG63, 143B, KHOS-312H, U2OS, and SJSA1 cells (10,000 cells per well) were seeded in a 96-well plate and infected with the indicated virus on the following day at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 and 0.1, in 50 µl of opti-MEM. On days 1 through 4 after infection, cell viability was measured using the MTS cell proliferation assay (Promega, Madison, WI), following the manufacturer recommendations.

Assessment of Viral Replication in OS Cell Lines

OS lines were plated in six-well plates at a density of 4 × 105 per well. Cells were infected at an MOI of 1, incubated at 32°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, and harvested at 1, 3, and 5 days after infection. The viruses were released by two cycles of freeze/thawing, and the viral titer was determined by end point dilution assay and expressed as 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50)/mL on Vero cells.

Western Blot

Cells were collected in RIPA buffer and samples loaded on 7.5% precast polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad) for SDS-PAGE. Gel was transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. Membranes were blocked (5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline–Tween) and incubated with Anti-N protein antibody developed in our laboratory (publication pending, Ianko Iankov) overnight at 4 °C. Rabbit mouse-specific polyvalent immunoglobulin (G, A, M) HRP conjugate (diluted 1:2000 in 5% dry milk in PBS) was used as the secondary antibody (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Anti-human β-actin was used as a control to ensure uniform loading. Antibody binding was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce).

Animal Experiments

143B osteosarcoma cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing firefly luciferase (143B-luc). 1×106 cells were then injected subcutaneously into the right flank or into the right tibial bone of 5 week old nude mice, as described elsewhere.29 For the lung metastasis model, 1×106 cells were injected into the tail vein of mice and lung tumors allowed to engraft over 10 days. Mice were considered to have reached the euthanasia endpoint if more than 20% weight loss, tumor exceeding 10% of body weight, or if their tumors developed ulcerations. All experimental protocols were approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

In Vivo Imaging

Engraftment in tibial bone was verified 4 days post implantation, and pulmonary engraftment was verified 10 days post implantation on a Xenogen bioluminescence Imaging System. In order to assess viral replication in vivo, subcutaneous xenografts were treated intratumorally with MV-NIS every 4 days for two weeks. On day 14 mice were then injected with 99Tc (100 μCi) intraperitoneally, and tumor imaging was performed serially with a high-resolution micro single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) system (X-SPECT; Gamma Medica-Ideas, Inc., Northridge, CA).

Dynamic PET imaging was performed in intravenously treated orthotopic xenografts on day 14 of MV-NIS therapy. Following intraperitoneal injection ~0.07 MBq Na [18F]BF4/g body weight of animal PET scans were acquired for 60 min followed by an X-ray scan using the GENISYS4 PET imaging system (Sofie Biosciences, CA). The images were analyzed for Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in tumor, stomach, thyroid and bladder using AMIDE image analysis tool. Na [18F]BF4 was prepared by a modification of Jauregui-Osoro et al.27 Isotope exchange performed in 0.5M HCl at 130°C for 10 min followed by neutralization on a Dionex OnGuard AG SPE cartridge and fluoride separation on two Waters neutral alumina SPE cartridges. The product was then sterile filtered through a 0.2 micron filter and radiochemical purity was >99% by silica gel TLC (MeOH). The specific activity was 2–5 μCi/μg.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego CA).

Results

MV-GFP and MV-NIS have potent anti-tumor efficacy against osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro

We used two trackable oncolytic MV-Edm derivatives in our in vitro studies (Figure 1A): MV-GFP expressing the green fluorescence protein and MV-NIS. A panel of six osteosarcoma cell lines were studied, and all of them expressed high levels of the MV receptor, CD46 (Figure 1B). Cell lines were also analyzed for expression of Nectin-4, the epithelial receptor for Measles Virus, and no significant expression was detected (data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Virus schema and Measles virus CD46 receptor expression. (A) Genomic organization of MV-Edm derivatives, MV-GFP and MV-NIS. N, nucleoprotein; P, phosphoprotein; M, matrix protein; F, fusion protein; H, hemagglutinin; L, large protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein; NIS, sodium iodide symporter. (B) osteosarcoma cell lines were tested for the MV receptors, CD46 and Nectin-4, by flow cytometry. Solid line histograms represent isotype control staining, while CD46 staining is represented by shaded histograms. CD46 expression was detectable in all cell lines tested.

Following infection with MV-GFP at an MOI of 1 there was efficient killing of 4 of 6 osteosarcoma cell line monolayers (U2OS, HOS, KHOS-312H, and SJSA1 cells) within 48–72 hours (Figure 2A). MV-NIS had superior in vitro efficacy as compared to MV-GFP, with activity against all six lines, including the MG63 and 143B cells (Figure 2B). Because of the transcriptional gradient during MV replication30 the different transgene positions within the MV genome (position 1 for MV-GFP vs position 6 for MV-NIS) could explain the difference in cytopathic effect we observed between the two strains.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Osteosarcoma cell lines are susceptible to MV infection. (A) Significant cytopathic effect observed against different osteosarcoma cell lines following MV-GFP infection at an MOI of 1 (n=3 independent experiments). (B) MV-NIS infection at an MOI of 1 similarly led to significant cell death (n=3 independent experiments). The MV-NIS cytopathic effect peaked earlier in the majority of cell lines, likely reflecting the impact of different transgene position on viral replication.

Though the pulmonary metastatic 143B cell line was intermediately susceptible to MV-GFP oncolysis, infection with MV-GFP led to abundant green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression. Green fluorescence increased over the course of infection, and syncytia grew in size and number ultimately leading to eradication of the monolayer. MV nucleoprotein (N-protein) expression was verified by western blot, and N-protein expression increased over the first 3 days of infection (Fig 3A and 3B). Relative resistance to infection of 143B cells to MV-GFP could be overcome by increasing the multiplicity of infection (not shown). In one step viral growth curves both strains resulted in replication, although higher titers of MV-NIS versus MV-GFP were obtained (Fig 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MV-GFP infection kinetics in the moderately susceptible 143B sarcoma cell line. MV-GFP infection leads to (A) GFP expression is increased over time until monolayer obliteration. Images A1, 2, 3 were taken on days 1, 2, and 3 respectively following infection (4 × magnification). (B) Increased expression of measles N protein during the same time course.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

MV-GFP and MV-NIS replicate efficiently in tumor lines, as demonstrated by one-step viral growth curves. Increased replication of MV-NIS as compared to MV-GFP was seen in the panel of 6 osteosarcoma cell lines.

Characterization of 143B-luc flank, orthotopic, and metastatic osteosarcoma xenograft models

To investigate the therapeutic potential of MV-NIS treatment in the recurrent or pulmonary metastatic setting the aggressive and highly metastatic 143B cell line was chosen for xenograft development. 143B cells were transduced by a lentivirus expressing firefly luciferase, to generate 143B-luc cells. We injected 100µL of 143B-luc tumor cells (1×106) into the right flank, right tibial bone, or intravenously into the tail vein of 5 week old mice to establish xenografts. Following verification of engraftment mice were then treated either with MV-NIS or heat-inactivated control virus every 4 days for a total of 4 weeks (Figure 5). Subcutaneous and orthotopic tibial tumors could be detected by luciferin bioluminescence within 4 days of implantation. Lung engraftment was similarly verified at 10 days post intravenous implantation (Supplemental Figure).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

MV-NIS treatment schema. 143B-luc osteosarcoma cells were implanted into the right flank, right tibial bone, or via tail vein injection (lung metastasis model). On the day prior to the MV-NIS treatment initiation, engraftment was confirmed by Xenogen bioluminescence imaging. Mice were then randomized to receive intravenous MV-NIS treatment or heat-inactivated virus every 4 days for a total of 4 weeks. Two weeks after the initiation of therapy, mice were also imaged by SPECT-CT or PET-CT to monitor in vivo viral activity.

MV-NIS has potent antitumor activity in mouse xenografts

Flank tumors were generated, and were treated every four days with intratumoral injections of 1×106 TCID50 MV-GFP, MV-NIS, or heat-inactivated control virus (n=5 per group), and tumor size was measured with digital calipers. A decrease in tumor growth was observed (Figure 6) with MV-GFP (p=0.0407) and MV-NIS treatment (p=0.0374).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Flank tumor growth was suppressed by intratumoral MV-NIS therapy. OS flank xenografts were treated every four days with intratumoral injections of 1×106 TCID50 MV-GFP, MV-NIS, or heat-inactivated control virus (n=5 per group), which led to suppression of tumor growth both in MV-GFP (p=0.0407) and MV-NIS (p=0.0374) treated mice.

In the orthotopic model, tibial bone tumors grew rapidly in heat-inactivated virus treated animals (n=10) and in some cases tumors were associated with lytic destruction of the underlying tibial bone (Figure 7B and 7C). Intravenous treatment with MV-NIS (n=10) led to a significant decrease in the growth of orthotopic leg tumors, p=0.0014; data shown as mean ± SE (Figure 7A). After two weeks of MV therapy, there was clear evidence of syncytial formation with nuclear coalescence and positive staining for the viral N-protein (Figure 7D) in MV treated tumors. Metastatic tumor foci were often noted post mortem: the majority of metastases were involving the lungs with metastatic involvement of appendicular and axial bony skeleton also being common. Mice with pulmonary tumors generally had to be euthanized due to cachexia, lethargy, hunched posture, and in some instances cord compression and hind limb paralysis secondary to metastatic involvement of the vertebral spine.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Systemic MV-NIS therapy shows antitumor activity in orthotopic xenografts. Orthotopic tumors were treated every four days with IV injections of 1×106 TCID50 MV-NIS or heat-inactivated control virus (n=10 per group). (A) MV-NIS treatment suppressed the the growth of leg tumors compared to controls (p=0.0014), data are shown as mean ± SE, n = 10 per group. A representative photograph of (B) an orthotopic tibial tumor two weeks after implantation and (C) representative radiographic image of an orthotopic leg tumor 6 weeks after engraftment is shown. (D) After two weeks of MV-NIS therapy excised orthotopic tibial tumors show evidence of syncytia formation and expression of Measles N-protein by immunohistochemistry.

We also assessed survival following MV-treatment both in tibial orthotopic and pulmonary metastatic osteosarcoma xenografts. Xenografts treated every 4 days with MV-NIS (n=10) at a dose of 1×106 TCID50 had a statistically significant prolongation of survival compared to mice treated with heat-inactivated virus (n=10) both in the orthotopic tibial bone model (p<0.0001, Fig 8A) and the pulmonary metastatic model (p=0.0207, Fig 8B). In the orthotopic model, median survival of the treated mice was 60 days compared to 30 days for control animals. In fact, all MV-NIS treated mice with orthotopic tibial xenografts were alive on day 40, as compared to none of the mice in the control group.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

MV-NIS therapy increases survival in OS xenograft models. MV-NIS treatment was associated with a significant increase in overall survival in (A) the tibial orthotopic (p<0.0001) and (B) pulmonary metastatic (p=0.0207) models as shown by Kaplan Meier curves comparing control to MV-NIS treatment twice weekly for 4 weeks, n = 10 per treatment group.

MV-NIS infects osteosarcoma xenografts and NIS transgene expression can be monitored in vivo

In a separate study in order to assess viral replication in vivo, mice were treated with MV-NIS every 4 days for two weeks either directly into flank tumors or intravenously in established orthotopic xenografts. Monitoring of viral infection and replication in vivo was then performed using two different imaging modalities. In the subcutaneous flank tumor model MV-NIS treated mice (intratumoral injection) were administered Tc-99m into the peritoneum (IP) on day 14 and then imaged 30 minutes later by CT-SPECT. Intratumoral accumulation of Tc-99m in subcutaneous flank tumors was seen in mice treated with MV-NIS (Figure 9A), but not in animals treated with the inactive virus preparation (Figure 9A, lower panel). Cross-sectional imaging demonstrated MV-NIS replication in tumors: expression of NIS by infected tumor cells resulted in Tc-99m concentration, which we could detect by SPECT imaging.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

MV-NIS treatment allows real-time in vivo imaging of viral replication. After two weeks of MV-NIS therapy OS xenografts were imaged by CT-SPECT or PET-CT. (A) Flank xenografts treated every four days for two weeks with intratumoral injections of 1×106 TCID50 were imaged by CT-SPECT. Representative image shows uptake of Tc-99m in flank tumors (large arrows) of MV-NIS treated (9A, upper panel), but not inactivated virus treated animals (9A, lower panel). (B) Orthotopic tibial xenografts were treated intravenously every four days for two weeks with 1×106 TCID50 MV-NIS. They were subsequently imaged by PET-CT after F-18 TFB administration. In contrast to MV-NIS treated animals (9B, right panel), no significant uptake was seen in control virus treated mice (9B, left panel).

We next evaluated the ability of intravenous MV-NIS therapy to result in the intratumoral concentration of the radioactive tracer [18F] tetrafluoroborate (F-18 TFB), through NIS mediated transport. PET-CT imaging performed 60 minutes after IP administration F-18 TFB resulted in significant uptake in tibial tumors (Figure 9B) and thereby convincingly demonstrated viral replication and associated NIS gene expression in osteosarcoma tumors following systemic viral administration.

Discussion

Osteosarcoma is an aggressive bone cancer with peak incidence in childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood. While surgical advancements and combination chemotherapy have led to a 65–70% cure rate, no additional improvement in survival has materialized during the last two decades: new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed for this young patient population.

Oncolytic measles virotherapy provides a novel and safe therapeutic strategy for treatment of recurrent and metastatic osteosarcoma. The fact that viruses have adapted over millennia of evolution to efficiently invade cells and overtake the biosynthetic machinery, makes them attractive candidates for the development of novel antitumor approaches. Other groups have used replication-competent oncolytic viruses in the treatment of osteosarcoma mostly focusing on in vitro efficacy studies and loco-regional in vivo delivery. Oncolytic Semliki forest virus was previously shown to have in vitro activity, and intratumoral injections in an orthotopic K7M3 tumor model showed tumor regression and survival benefit. Poliovirus targets the cell surface receptor CD155, and was found to induce apoptosis through induction of caspases 7 and 3 in bone and soft tissue sarcoma cells 31. Vesicular stomatitis virus delivered by isolated limb perfusion has similarly been shown to suppress osteosarcoma growth in an immune competent rat model of osteosarcoma 29. Our study represents the first report that demonstrates efficacy of an engineered MV strain in treatment of bone sarcomas, following both intratumoral and systemic administration in challenging to treat orthotopic and lung metastatic models.

In this study, we have demonstrated that MV infects osteosarcoma cell lines and that replication of MV is efficient, with evidence of viral replication to high titers in osteosarcoma cells. Indeed, intravenous delivery of MV-NIS resulted in a decrease in growth of 143B orthotopic tumors and prolongation of survival of tumor bearing mice. We have also shown that SPECT or PET-CT allow for efficient tracking of infected osteosarcoma cells in vivo. We showed that intratumoral and intravenous therapy can both be monitored in vivo, and that SPECT and PET-CT imaging are sensitive enough to differentiate infected tumor cell uptake. The ability to monitor viral replication and transgene expression in vivo also allows for pharmacodynamic measurements of viral distribution and dissemination, and various radioactive substrates can be used to quantify NIS gene expression including perchlorate, tetrafluoroborate, and pertechnetate. Recently reported clinical data support that SPECT-CT can be used to monitor viral replication in patients, for example, myeloma tumor deposits following systemic administration32. NIS may also be used as a therapeutic transgene capable of further increasing the oncolytic potency of MV-NIS by allowing the intracellular concentration of radioisotopes, such as the beta particle emitter, 131I as a mediator of radiovirotherapy.33

MV has also been shown to directly activate the immune system in immune competent pre-clinical models. The viral hemagglutinin has been shown to interact with and induce toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2) signaling, and TLR-7 and TLR-9 have also been shown to be involved in viral nucleic acid detection and anti-viral signaling.34, 35 Similarly, in pre-clinical studies measles virus vaccine-infected tumor cells co-cultured with plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) induce maturation of dendritic cells into efficient antigen presenting cells, with upregulation of costimulatory molecules CD40 and CD86.36 The anti-tumor activity of DCs depend on IFN-α mediated autocrine stimulation, and IFN-α can also directly stimulate apoptosis in tumor cells.37 IFN-α induction by 2-methoxyestradiol in osteosarcoma cells has similarly been shown to have anti-proliferative effects in vitro.38. MV-Edm derivatives have also been engineered to express immunostimulatory cytokines including GM-CSF (MV-GM-CSF) and IFNβ (MV-IFNβ)39, 40, both important immune regulators that have been shown to induce antitumor immune responses in several tumor types.41, 42 Work in our laboratory has also demonstrated that MV transgene expression of the immunomodulatory Helicobacter pylori neutrophil-activating protein (NAP) induces a brisk Th1 cytokine response in vivo, associated with high levels of TNF-α production as well as prolongation of survival in an aggressive model of lung metastatic breast cancer.43 These engineered strains could also have excellent applicability in the treatment of osteosarcoma as they could bridge oncolytic virotherapy with sarcoma immunotherapy, and they are currently in preclinical investigation.

MV has an acknowledged record of safety in large-scale immunization campaigns; however, widespread immunization in the Western world can also pose a major challenge to oncolytic measles virotherapy approaches. While delivery challenges are difficult to address in immunocompromised xenograft models, several techniques have been used to augment treatment efficacy. Rapid clearance of virus can take place shortly after the virus is introduced into an immunized host and represents a potential limitation for systemic administration approaches. Strategies for augmenting potency and ensuring safety of virotherapy include viral genetic manipulations, as already described, concurrent chemotherapy, and immunomodulatory use of cyclophosphamide as has been demonstrated for MV-NIS in primate models.44 Intravenous delivery of high doses of MV in patients lacking anti-MV neutralizing antibodies has been successfully employed against refractory multiple myeloma.32 However, in the presence of neutralizing titers of anti-measles antibodies infected cell carriers have been used efficaciously to deliver MV to tumor cells;45 the infected cell carriers can circumvent and increase efficacy in the setting of pre-existing anti-measles humoral immunity. This concept has been demonstrated by our group employing dendritic cells in breast cancer xenografts11 and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) carriers in passively immunized mice bearing ovarian xenografts.46 More recently, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (BM-MSC) carriers were similarly used in passively immunized mice to efficiently deliver MV in a systemic xenograft model of precursor B-lineage-ALL.47

In summary, our results demonstrate that MV-NIS exhibits significant therapeutic effect against human osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro and orthotopic and metastatic disease models in vivo. MV could provide a new therapeutic addition to multimodality treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic osteosarcoma, especially given the lack of cross-resistance with existing therapies and continuing improvements in the production of high titer therapeutic viral preparations. Promising emerging data in other tumor types such as ovarian cancer10 and multiple myeloma32 further highlight this potential. Based on these encouraging results, this approach has significant translational potential, and further preclinical and clinical studies are warranted.

Supplementary Material

1. Supplemental Figure 1.

Confirmation of tumor engraftment. Engraftment of 143B-luc cells is verified prior to the start of MV-NIS therapy in (A) subcutaneous, (B) orthotopic, and (C) pulmonary metastatic models. Representative images are shown (Xenogen).

Acknowledgements

Grants to acknowledge

Support for this research provided by the Clinical Investigator Training Program and a small grant from the Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic; and NCI/NIH grants R01CA 154348 and R01CA 136547.

We would like to thank Ianko Iankov, MD, PhD for his methodological assistance and kindly providing the anti MV nucleoprotein antibody used in this study. We would like to also thank Mark Federspiel, PhD and the Viral Vector Production Laboratory (Mayo Clinic) for providing MV-NIS preparations used in our studies, and Dona Hirosha Geekiyanage, PhD for technical advice and helpful discussions.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Skubitz KM, D'Adamo DR. Sarcoma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(11):1409–1432. doi: 10.4065/82.11.1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Link MP, Goorin AM, Miser AW, Green AA, Pratt CB, Belasco JB, et al. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(25):1600–1606. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606193142502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Provisor AJ, Ettinger LJ, Nachman JB, Krailo MD, Makley JT, Yunis EJ, et al. Treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity with preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(1):76–84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ritter J, Bielack SS. Osteosarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii320–vii325. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Msaouel P, Opyrchal M, Domingo Musibay E, Galanis E. Oncolytic measles virus strains as novel anticancer agents. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(4):483–502. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2013.749851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bluming AZ, Ziegler JL. Regression of Burkitt's lymphoma in association with measles infection. Lancet. 1971;2(7715):105–106. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92086-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Taqi AM, Abdurrahman MB, Yakubu AM, Fleming AF. Regression of Hodgkin's disease after measles. Lancet. 1981;1(8229):1112. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92286-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cutts FT, Markowitz LE. Successes and failures in measles control. J Infect Dis. 1994;170(Suppl 1):S32–S41. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.supplement_1.s32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Allen C, Paraskevakou G, Liu C, Iankov ID, Msaouel P, Zollman P, et al. Oncolytic measles virus strains in the treatment of gliomas. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008;8(2):213–220. doi: 10.1517/14712598.8.2.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Galanis E, Hartmann LC, Cliby WA, Long HJ, Peethambaram PP, Barrette BA, et al. Phase I trial of intraperitoneal administration of an oncolytic measles virus strain engineered to express carcinoembryonic antigen for recurrent ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(3):875–882. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Iankov ID, Msaouel P, Allen C, Federspiel MJ, Bulur PA, Dietz AB, et al. Demonstration of anti-tumor activity of oncolytic measles virus strains in a malignant pleural effusion breast cancer model. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;122(3):745–754. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0602-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu C, Sarkaria JN, Petell CA, Paraskevakou G, Zollman PJ, Schroeder M, et al. Combination of measles virus virotherapy and radiation therapy has synergistic activity in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(23):7155–7165. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Myers R, Harvey M, Kaufmann TJ, Greiner SM, Krempski JW, Raffel C, et al. Toxicology study of repeat intracerebral administration of a measles virus derivative producing carcinoembryonic antigen in rhesus macaques in support of a phase I/II clinical trial for patients with recurrent gliomas. Hum Gene Ther. 2008;19(7):690–698. doi: 10.1089/hum.2008.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pavlos M, Ianko DI, Cory A, John CM, Veronika von M, Roberto C, et al. Engineered measles virus as a novel oncolytic therapy against prostate cancer. The Prostate. 2009;69(1):82–91. doi: 10.1002/pros.20857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Naniche D, Varior-Krishnan G, Cervoni F, Wild TF, Rossi B, Rabourdin-Combe C, et al. Human membrane cofactor protein (CD46) acts as a cellular receptor for measles virus. J Virol. 1993;67(10):6025–6032. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.10.6025-6032.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Muhlebach MD, Mateo M, Sinn PL, Prufer S, Uhlig KM, Leonard VH, et al. Adherens junction protein nectin-4 is the epithelial receptor for measles virus. Nature. 2011;480(7378):530–533. doi: 10.1038/nature10639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dorig RE, Marcil A, Chopra A, Richardson CD. The human CD46 molecule is a receptor for measles virus (Edmonston strain) Cell. 1993;75(2):295–305. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80071-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mateo M, Navaratnarajah CK, Syed S, Cattaneo R. The measles virus hemagglutinin beta-propeller head beta4-beta5 hydrophobic groove governs functional interactions with nectin-4 and CD46 but not with the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule. J Virol. 2013 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01210-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jurianz K, Ziegler S, Garcia-Schuler H, Kraus S, Bohana-Kashtan O, Fishelson Z, et al. Complement resistance of tumor cells: basal and induced mechanisms. Mol Immunol. 1999;36(13–14):929–939. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(99)00115-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Surowiak P, Materna V, Maciejczyk A, Kaplenko I, Spaczynski M, Dietel M, et al. CD46 expression is indicative of shorter revival-free survival for ovarian cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(6C):4943–4948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Allen C, Vongpunsawad S, Nakamura T, James CD, Schroeder M, Cattaneo R, et al. Retargeted oncolytic measles strains entering via the EGFRvIII receptor maintain significant antitumor activity against gliomas with increased tumor specificity. Cancer Res. 2006;66(24):11840–11850. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bello MJ, de Campos JM, Kusak ME, Vaquero J, Sarasa JL, Pestana A, et al. Molecular analysis of genomic abnormalities in human gliomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1994;73(2):122–129. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(94)90195-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Linge C, Gewert D, Rossmann C, Bishop JA, Crowe JS. Interferon system defects in human malignant melanoma. Cancer Res. 1995;55(18):4099–4104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ahn BC. Sodium iodide symporter for nuclear molecular imaging and gene therapy: from bedside to bench and back. Theranostics. 2012;2(4):392–402. doi: 10.7150/thno.3722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dingli D, Peng KW, Harvey ME, Greipp PR, O'Connor MK, Cattaneo R, et al. Image-guided radiovirotherapy for multiple myeloma using a recombinant measles virus expressing the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter. Blood. 2004;103(5):1641–1646. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Msaouel P, Iankov ID, Allen C, Aderca I, Federspiel MJ, Tindall DJ, et al. Noninvasive imaging and radiovirotherapy of prostate cancer using an oncolytic measles virus expressing the sodium iodide symporter. Mol Ther. 2009;17(12):2041–2048. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jauregui-Osoro M, Sunassee K, Weeks AJ, Berry DJ, Paul RL, Cleij M, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of [(18)F]tetrafluoroborate: a PET imaging agent for thyroid disease and reporter gene imaging of the sodium/iodide symporter. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(11):2108–2116. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1523-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Duprex WP, McQuaid S, Hangartner L, Billeter MA, Rima BK. Observation of measles virus cell-to-cell spread in astrocytoma cells by using a green fluorescent protein-expressing recombinant virus. J Virol. 1999;73(11):9568–9575. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.11.9568-9575.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kubo T, Shimose S, Matsuo T, Fujimori J, Sakaguchi T, Yamaki M, et al. Oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus administered by isolated limb perfusion suppresses osteosarcoma growth. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(5):795–800. doi: 10.1002/jor.21307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Conzelmann KK. Nonsegmented negative-strand RNA viruses: genetics and manipulation of viral genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 1998;32:123–162. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Atsumi S, Matsumine A, Toyoda H, Niimi R, Iino T, Nakamura T, et al. Oncolytic virotherapy for human bone and soft tissue sarcomas using live attenuated poliovirus. Int J Oncol. 2012;41(3):893–902. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Russell SJ, Federspiel MJ, Peng KW, Tong C, Dingli D, Morice WG, et al. Remission of disseminated cancer after systemic oncolytic virotherapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.04.003. [epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Penheiter AR, Russell SJ, Carlson SK. The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as an imaging reporter for gene, viral, and cell-based therapies. Curr Gene Ther. 2012;12(1):33–47. doi: 10.2174/156652312799789235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kumar H, Kawai T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;388(4):621–625. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gilliet M, Cao W, Liu YJ. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: sensing nucleic acids in viral infection and autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(8):594–606. doi: 10.1038/nri2358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guillerme JB, Boisgerault N, Roulois D, Menager J, Combredet C, Tangy F, et al. Measles virus vaccine-infected tumor cells induce tumor antigen cross-presentation by human plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2013;19(5):1147–1158. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thyrell L, Erickson S, Zhivotovsky B, Pokrovskaja K, Sangfelt O, Castro J, et al. Mechanisms of Interferon-alpha induced apoptosis in malignant cells. Oncogene. 2002;21(8):1251–1262. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wimbauer F, Yang C, Shogren KL, Zhang M, Goyal R, Riester SM, et al. Regulation of interferon pathway in 2-methoxyestradiol-treated osteosarcoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Grote D, Cattaneo R, Fielding AK. Neutrophils contribute to the measles virus-induced antitumor effect: enhancement by granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor expression. Cancer Res. 2003;63(19):6463–6468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li H, Peng KW, Dingli D, Kratzke RA, Russell SJ. Oncolytic measles viruses encoding interferon beta and the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter gene for mesothelioma virotherapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2010;17(8):550–558. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2010.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gupta R, Emens LA. GM-CSF-secreting vaccines for solid tumors: moving forward. Discov Med. 2010;10(50):52–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bracarda S, Eggermont AM, Samuelsson J. Redefining the role of interferon in the treatment of malignant diseases. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(2):284–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Iankov ID, Allen C, Federspiel MJ, Myers RM, Peng KW, Ingle JN, et al. Expression of immunomodulatory neutrophil-activating protein of Helicobacter pylori enhances the antitumor activity of oncolytic measles virus. Mol Ther. 2012;20(6):1139–1147. doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Myers RM, Greiner SM, Harvey ME, Griesmann G, Kuffel MJ, Buhrow SA, et al. Preclinical pharmacology and toxicology of intravenous MV-NIS, an oncolytic measles virus administered with or without cyclophosphamide. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;82(6):700–710. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Iankov ID, Blechacz B, Liu C, Schmeckpeper JD, Tarara JE, Federspiel MJ, et al. Infected cell carriers: a new strategy for systemic delivery of oncolytic measles viruses in cancer virotherapy. Mol Ther. 2007;15(1):114–122. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mader EK, Maeyama Y, Lin Y, Butler GW, Russell HM, Galanis E, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell carriers protect oncolytic measles viruses from antibody neutralization in an orthotopic ovarian cancer therapy model. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2009;15(23):7246–7255. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Castleton A, Dey A, Beaton B, Patel B, Aucher A, Davis DM, et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells deliver systemic oncolytic measles virus to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the presence of humoral immunity. Blood. 2014;123(9):1327–1335. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-528851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1. Supplemental Figure 1.

Confirmation of tumor engraftment. Engraftment of 143B-luc cells is verified prior to the start of MV-NIS therapy in (A) subcutaneous, (B) orthotopic, and (C) pulmonary metastatic models. Representative images are shown (Xenogen).

RESOURCES