Skip to main content
Journal of Physical Therapy Science logoLink to Journal of Physical Therapy Science
. 2015 Feb 17;27(2):457–459. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.457

The effects of kinesio taping on architecture, strength and pain of muscles in delayed onset muscle soreness of biceps brachii

Yong Sin Lee 1, Sea Hyun Bae 2, Jin Ah Hwang 1, Kyung Yoon Kim 3,*
PMCID: PMC4339160  PMID: 25729190

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to confirm the effects of kinesio taping (KT) on muscle function and pain due to delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) of the biceps brachii. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty-seven subjects with induced DOMS were randomized into either Group I (control, n=19) or Group II (KT, n=18). Outcome measures were recorded before the intervention (application of KT) and at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the intervention. DOMS was induced, and muscle thickness was measured using ultrasonic radiography. Maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) was measured via electromyography (EMG). Subjective pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). [Results] Group I exhibited a positive correlation between muscle thickness and elapsed time from intervention (24, 48, and 72 hours post induction of DOMS); they also showed a significant decrease in MVIC(%). Group II showed significant increases in muscle thickness up to the 48-hour interval post induction of DOMS, along with a significant decrease in MVIC (%). However, in contrast to Group I, Group II did not show a significant difference in muscle thickness or MVIC (%) at the 72-hour interval in comparison with the values prior to DOMS induction. [Conclusion] In adults with DOMS, activation of muscles by applying KT was found to be an effective and faster method of recovering muscle strength than rest alone.

Key words: Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS), Kinesio taping, Muscle change

INTRODUCTION

Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is defined as muscle injury caused by movements people are unaccustomed to, by intensive physical activity, etc1). DOMS is usually experienced within 12 hours of the offending activity, with the pain reaching a maximum in the following 48 to 72 hours, and it commonly resolves within 5 to 7 days2).

Eccentric exercises are more likely to induce DOMS, movements which are rarely used in daily activities3). Muscle pain and loss of strength occur due to excessive eccentric contractions, which produce pools of intramuscular lactic acid4). Increases in muscle resting tension also temporarily alter muscle function5). DOMS manifests as limitations of range of motion (ROM), swelling, reduced muscle strength, increased muscle thickness, and limited functional movement6,7,8).

Taping has been used in general to protect joints, reduce swelling, and stabilize joints following acute injuries9). Elastic kinesio taping (KT) of muscle is effective for pain control due to increases in both blood and lymph circulations10). It is used for earlier recovery of muscle strength after exercise11).

Muscle thickness is a measure of muscle function that is taken using ultrasound while the muscle is actively contracting12). Electromyography (EMG) is used to assess the functional changes in muscle7, 13). A visual analogue scale (VAS) is also used to assess subjective changes in pain experienced14).

The objective of this study, therefore, was to ascertain how KT affects the thickness and %MVIC of muscle, and subjective pain experienced, as caused by induced DOMS, at different times of measurement.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Subjects

This study was conducted with male participants in their twenties. The inclusion criteria were as follows: no orthopedic problems in the preceding 6 months, no cardiovascular problems, no medications that may affect performance or measurement, no limitation in ROM, andright-handed dominant side. All of the subjects voluntarily consented to participate in this study. Data collection was initiated after approval was obtained from the Dongshin University Institutional Review Board (BM-006-01). The general characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.

Parameters Group I (n=19) Group II (n=18)
Age (years) 23.5±1.2 22.5±1.4
Height (cm) 169.1±3.1 171.4±3.6
Weight (kg) 65.1±3.7 66.5±5.0

All data are expressed as means with standard deviations (SDs). Group I, control; Group II, kinesio taping

Methods

Out of the 50 participants, only 37 experienced DOMS following the procedure outlined below. These 37 were then grouped into Group I (control, no treatment, n=19) and Group II (KT, n=18) by picking up a ball with either group labeled on it. Dumbbells to elicit 70% of maximal isometric muscle strength (1 RM) of each subject were used to induce DOMS in the following way. With their nondominant arms on a table, the subjects were asked to flex their shoulders to 45 degrees, and elbows to 90 degrees and to maintain this position for 3 seconds. Following this, they slowly extended their elbows to the fully extended position. After full extension, they were passively returned to the starting position of 90 degrees of elbow flexion. This exercise was performed for 7 sets of 10 repetitions per set. The subjects were rested for 1 minute between sets15). In Group II, KT was applied to the biceps brachii on the nondominant side in a direction perpendicular to the muscle fibers. Ultrasonography (Sonoace X49900, Medison, Seoul, South Korea) was used to measure muscle thickness. This was measured at the midpoint of the muscle belly, which was calculated to be at a point 30% of the way along the biceps muscle and proximal to the elbow joint. The measurement was taken with the subject sitting and the elbow fully extended. For measurement of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC), a surface EMG (BTS Pocket EMG, BTS S.p.A.,Milan, Italy) was used. Data were collected with subjects sitting and the elbow flexed to 90 degrees against resistance. The sample collection rate was 1,000 Hz, and filtering was 20 to 500 Hz. A VAS was used to assess subjective pain level. Each session was repeated 3 times with a 1 minute break between sessions. Outcome measures were collected a total of 4 times, before the intervention and at 24, 48, and 72 hour postintervention.

For statistical analysis, SPSS 12.0 for Windows was used. Comparison between groups at different times was performed by one-way repeated measure ANOVA. When a significant difference was found, a contrast test was performed. The statistical significance level was set at α=0.05.

RESULTS

Upon analysis of muscle thickness and MVIC (%) before and after induced DOMS, Group I showed increases in muscle thickness and decreases in MVIC (%) over time (p<0.001). Group II mirrored the increase in muscle thickness and decrease in MVIC (%) up to the 48 hour interval post induction of DOMS (p<0.001), but at the 72 hour interval, the measurements obtained showed no significant difference in muscle thickness and MVIC (%) for Group II when compared with those from before induction of DOMS (p>0.05) (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2. The changes of muscle thickness (cm).

−24 h 24 h 48 h 72 h
Group I 1.20±0.18 1.48±0.11a)*** 1.50±0.12b)*** 1.41±0.11c)***
Group II 1.30±0.97 1.51±1.56a)*** 1.58±0.4b)*** 1.31±0.11

All values are shown as the mean±SD. Group I, control; Group II, kinesio taping. a) −24 h vs. 24 h, b) −24 h vs. 48 h, and c) −24 h vs. 72 h by one-way repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc testing with a contrast test (***; p<0.001)

Table 3. The changes of MVIC (%).

−24 h 24 h 48 h 72 h
Group I 33.1±1.3 28.1±1.5a)*** 28.8±1.3b)*** 29.5±1.8c)***
Group II 31.1±1.0 26.2±1.8a)*** 27.9±1.3b)*** 30.9±1.8

All values are shown as the mean±SD. GroupI, control; Group II, kinesio taping. a) −24 h vs. 24 h, b) −24 h vs. 48 h, and c) −24 h vs. 72 h by one-way repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc testing with a contrast test (***; p<0.001)

DISCUSSION

Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) after excessive or unaccustomed use of muscles can occur in anyone16). It is related to inflammation resulting from damage to muscle and connective tissue17). KT reduces pain via mechanical stimulation18). It is also known to be effective in the restoration of ROM and muscle strength19). KT maintains consistent muscle tension and further improves muscle function by enhancing stability20). The aim of this study was to find out how KT influences muscle thickness, MVIC (%), and subjective pain in adults with deliberately induced DOMS 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours postintervention.

To properly assess muscle function, it is important to compare and analyze muscle with ultrasound21). This makes it possible to assess characteristics of muscle such as size, thickness, shape, and function8). Muscle thickness is an especially important gauge of the mechanical properties of muscle and the changes that are occurring to inner structures22).

After induction of DOMS, muscle thickness in both Group I and II showed increases at the 24 hour and 48 hour intervals. At the 72 hour interval, Group II showed a muscle thickness that was similar to the measurements obtained before induced DOMS. We believe this to be due to KT stimulating γ-motor neurons within skeletal muscle with a subsequent effect on resting muscle tension.

DOMS causes reduced muscle function and damages muscle fibers more in eccentric contractions than concentric ones23). Surface EMG analyzes the electrical activity of individual muscles and provides information about changes in motor control24).

Changes in muscle function are measured via %MVIC7). Following induction of DOMS, Group II had decreases in MVIC (%) at 24 and 48 hours intervals, although MVIC (%) recovered by the 72 hour interval. Group I showed significant decreases in MVIC (%) at all intervals. We believe this to be due to metabolic problems occurring within the muscle due to the increase in muscle thickness, the buildup of cellular waste products, and to a decrease in contractility as a result of myofiber microtrauma. We also believe that the recovery of altered tissues in Group II was facilitated by KT due to its elastic nature, which raises the skin and muscle fascia.

Changes in subjective pain levels were measured by VAS15). Both Group I and Group II with induced DOMS showed increased pain levels 24 hours after the intervention, reaching a maximum 48 hours post intervention and decreasing at the 72 hour mark. We propose that this proves that elastic KT is effective in reducing pain. We further suggest that this will have a positive psychological effect and hasten the return to daily routine (Table 4).

Table 4. The changes of VAS (scores).

−24 h 24 h 48 h 72 h
Group I 0 5.29±1.37 5.86±0.13 4.52±1.36
Group II 0 5.07±1.28 5.74±0.17 2.19±0.23a)***

All values are shown as the mean±SD. GroupI, control; Group II, kinesio taping. a)24 h vs. 72 h by one-way repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc testing with a contrast test (***; p<0.001)

In conclusion, elastic KT was found to reduce pain by improving muscle function and strength, as it provides an environment conducive to recovery. It achieves this by activating muscles with DOMS. KT was found to be an important modality in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Host HH: Scapular taping in the treatment of anterior shoulder impingement. Phys Ther, 1995, 75: 803–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kisner C, Colby LA: Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques, 5th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 2007, pp 147–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Noonan TJ, Best TM, Seaber AV, et al. : Thermal effects on skeletal muscle tensile behavior. Am J Sports Med, 1993, 21: 517–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Komi PV, Buskirk ER: Effect of eccentric and concentric muscle conditioning on tension and electrical activity of human muscle. Ergonomics, 1972, 15: 417–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cleak MJ, Eston RG: Muscle soreness, swelling, stiffness and strength loss after intense eccentric exercise. Br J Sports Med, 1992, 26: 267–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sellwood KL, Brukner P, Williams D, et al. : Ice-water immersion and delayed-onset muscle soreness: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med, 2007, 41: 392–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hortobágyi T, Houmard J, Fraser D, et al. : Normal forces and myofibrillar disruption after repeated eccentric exercise. J Appl Physiol 1985, 1998, 84: 492–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Narici MV, Maganaris CN, Reeves ND, et al. : Effect of aging on human muscle architecture. J Appl Physiol 1985, 2003, 95: 2229–2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee MH, Lee CR, Park JS, et al. : Influence of kinesio taping on the motor neuron conduction velocity. J Phys Ther Sci, 2011, 23: 313–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hinman RS, Crossley KM, McConnell J, et al. : Efficacy of knee tape in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2003, 327: 135–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hunter LY: Braces and taping. Clin Sports Med, 1985, 4: 439–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kiesel KB, Uhl TL, Underwood FB, et al. : Measurement of lumbar multifidus muscle contraction with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. Man Ther, 2007, 12: 161–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nosaka K, Clarkson PM: Variability in serum creatine kinase response after eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. Int J Sports Med, 1996, 17: 120–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vaile J, Halson S, Gill N, et al. : Effect of hydrotherapy on the signs and symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2008, 102: 447–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Behm DG, Baker KM, Kelland R, et al. : The effect of muscle damage on strength and fatigue deficits. J Strength Cond Res, 2001, 15: 255–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Petrofsky J, Batt J, Bollinger JN, et al. : Comparison of different heat modalities for treating delayed-onset muscle soreness in people with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2011, 13: 645–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lieber RL, Friden J: Morphologic and mechanical basis of delayed-onset muscle soreness. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2002, 10: 67–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Perrin DH: Athletic taping and Bracing. Champaign: Human Kinetic, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T, et al. : Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method. Tokyo: Ken Ikai, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ramón T, Prades M, Armengou L, et al. : Effects of athletic taping of the fetlock on distal limb mechanics. Equine Vet J, 2004, 36: 764–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lieber RL, Fridén J: Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve, 2000, 23: 1647–1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rezasoltani A: The applicability of muscle ultrasonography in physiotherapy researches. J Phys Ther Sci, 2003, 15: 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hedayatpour N, Falla D, Arendt-Nielsen L, et al. : Motor unit conduction velocity during sustained contraction after eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2009, 41: 1927–1933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee SY, Shim JM, Park MC: The effects of manual resistance training on improving muscle strength of the lower extremities of the community dwelling elderly: a clinical intervention study with a control group. J Phys Ther Sci, 2011, 23: 549–551. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Physical Therapy Science are provided here courtesy of Society of Physical Therapy Science

RESOURCES