Abstract
Background
Endometrial cancer (EC) has only been recently recognized as a major component in Cowden syndrome (CS). Germline PTEN (PTEN_mut+), SDHB-D (SDHx_var+) and KLLN (KLLN_Me+) alterations cause CS and CS-like (CSL) phenotypes. This study aims to identify prevalence and clinico-pathologic predictors of germline PTEN_mut+, SDHx_var+ or KLLN_Me+ in CS/CSL patients presenting with EC.
Methods
PTEN and SDHB-D mutation and KLLN promoter methylation analyses were performed on 371 prospectively enrolled (2005–2011) patients. PTEN protein was analyzed from patient-derived lymphoblast lines. PTEN Cleveland Clinic score (CC score) is a weighted regression-based risk calculator that gives a priori risk of PTEN_mut+. Demographic and clinicopathologic features were correlated with specific gene.
Results
Germline PTEN_mut+, SDHx_var+ and KLLN_Me+ were found in 7%, 9.8% and 10.5% of informative samples, respectively. Predictors of PTEN_mut+ included age≤50 (OR6.1, p=0.015 for age<30, OR4.4, p=0.001 for age 30–50), macrocephaly (OR14.4, p<0.001), higher CC score (OR1.35 for 1 unit increment, p<0.001), PTEN protein level at the lowest quartile (OR5.1, p=0.039) and coexisting renal cancer (OR5.7, p=0.002). KLLN_Me+ patients were a mean 8 years younger than KLLN_Me− ones (44 vs. 52, p=0.018). Predictors of KLLN_Me+ were younger age and higher CC score. On the other hand, no clinical predictors of SDH_var+ were found.
Conclusions
We identified clinical predictors of PTEN and KLLN alterations, but not SDHx_var+. Having these predictors should alert the treating physician to potential heritable risk for referral to genetic professionals. High-risk cancer surveillance and prophylactic surgery of the uterus may be considered for KLLN_Me+ similar to PTEN_mut+ patients.
Keywords: Cowden syndrome, Cowden-like syndrome, endometrial cancer, PTEN, SDHB-D, KLLN
Introduction
Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the seventh leading cause of death in women in the United States. It is estimated that 49,560 will be diagnosed with endometrial cancer and 8,190 will die of the disease in 20131. Most cases of endometrial carcinoma are sporadic. However, heritable endometrial cancer has been associated with two inherited cancer syndromes, Lynch and Cowden syndromes. Little is known about the latter in endometrial cancer presentations.
Cowden syndrome (CS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by multiple hamartomas and high risks of breast, thyroid, renal and endometrial carcinomas2,3. Germline PTEN mutation has been reported in 77–81% of classic CS cases4,5. However, we recently demonstrated that germine PTEN mutation was found in only 25% of classic CS patients accrued from the community3.
Endometrial cancer has been recently recognized as a major component of Cowden syndrome. Individuals with germline PTEN mutations have a 28% lifetime endometrial cancer risk2. Identifying PTEN-related endometrial cancers is important because of the increased risks of other cancers and implications for family members, with the potential for gene-directed cancer prevention. Therefore, it is important to identify clinical predictors, which can serve as a tool for oncologists to identify those at high-risk of germline PTEN mutation for referral to genetics specialists for gene testing and gene-informed medical management and high risk surveillance.
Subsets of CS/CSL individuals with no germline PTEN mutations were found to have germline SDHB/C/D variation and KLLN promoter methylation6,7. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) belongs to mitochondrial complex II that participates in both the electron transport chain and Krebs cycle. Heterozygous germline mutations in SDHB/C/D cause pheochromocytoma and/or paraganglioma8–11. Germline SDHB/C/D variation was found in 8% of PTEN mutation negative CS/CSL individuals7. Individuals with SDHB/C/D variants have higher risks of breast and thyroid cancers compared to those with germline PTEN mutation7. Among 123 CS/CSL individuals with no germline PTEN or SDH alteration, 37% were found to have germline KLLN promoter methylation with higher prevalence of breast and renal cancers compared to those with germline PTEN mutations6. KLLN is a p53-regulated gene located upstream of PTEN and shares a bidirectional promoter region.
In CS/CSL individuals with endometrial cancer, information on the prevalence of germline SDHB/C/D variation and KLLN promoter methylation is absent. Further, it is unknown whether germline SDH or KLLN alterations have similar clinical features compared to those with germline PTEN mutation or not. These data are important when counseling patients about gene-specific risks of endometrial cancer, and hence, affects their clinical management and subsequent follow-up. Therefore, the objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence of germline PTEN, SDHB/C/D and KLLN alterations among CS/CSL individuals with endometrial cancer. Furthermore, we sought to investigate clinical features predictive of germline PTEN, SDHB/C/D and KLLN alterations among CS/CSL individuals with endometrial cancer, to help identify those in general oncologic practices for referral to genetics professionals.
Materials and Methods
Research participants
We included CS and CSL patients with EC who were prospectively enrolled from 10/1/2005 to 12/31/2011 in accordance with our research protocol IRB8458 (sub-study PTEN), which was approved by the Cleveland Clinic and respective Institutional Review Boards. Probands who met at least the relaxed International Cowden Consortium operational criteria for CS were eligible. Relaxed criteria are defined as full criteria (Table 1) minus one criterion, and such individuals are referred to have CSL. These patients were recruited from both community and academic medical centers throughout North America, Europe, and Asia. Cancer genetics professionals reviewed all medical records, and if necessary, further primary documentation of medical records/pathology reports were obtained with the patients’ consent. PTEN Cleveland Clinic scoring system (CC score) is derived as described in our prior studies3.
Table 1.
Pathognomonic criteria | Adult Lhermitte-Duclos disease (LDD) (cerebellar tumors) Mucocutaneous lesions Trichilemmomas, facial Acral keratoses Papillomatous papules Mucosal lesions |
Major criteria | Breast cancer Thyroid cancer (nonmedullary) Macrocephaly (megalocephaly) (i.e. 97th percentile and above) Endometrial cancer |
Minor criteria | Other thyroid lesions (e.g. adenoma, multinodular goiter) Mental retardation (i.e. IQ of 75 and below) Gastrointestinal hamartomas Fibrocystic disease of the breast Lipomas Fibromas Genitourinary tumors (especially renal cell carcinoma) Genitourinary malformations Uterine fibroids |
Operational diagnosis in an individual (any of the following) | Mucocutaneous lesions alone if there are: Six or more facial papules of which three must be trichilemmomas, or Cutaneous facial papules and oral mucosal papillomatosis, or Oral mucosal papillomatosis and acral keratoses, or Six or more palmoplantar keratoses, or Two or more major criteria of which one must be macrocephaly or LDD, or One major and at least three minor criteria, or Four or more minor criteria |
Operational diagnosis in a family where one individual is diagnostic for Cowden Syndrome | Any one pathognomonic criterion Any one major criteria with or without minor criteria Two minor criteria History of Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome |
Cowden-Like Syndrome | Individuals meeting above criteria minus one criterion |
PTEN mutation and deletion analysis
All patients underwent PTEN (NM_000314.4) mutation analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using standard methods12. Scanning of genomic DNA samples for PTEN mutations was performed with a combination of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, high-resolution melting curve analysis (Idaho Technology, Salt Lake City, UT) and direct Sanger sequencing (ABI 3730xl; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described13. Deletion analysis using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay14 was performed with the P158 MLPA kit (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All patients underwent PCR-based Sanger sequencing of the PTEN promoter region as previously described15. Promoter mutations/variations were defined as previously reported15,16, except for −1084T>C; this variant has been rarely reported in population controls of European descent (two of 150)17 and further work is required to characterize its functionality, thus, we consider it as a variant of unknown clinical significance (VUS) at this time.
SDHB/C/D mutation and deletion analysis
Germline genomic DNA from 367 eligible patients was analyzed for SDHB/C/D mutations/variations as previously reported by our laboratory7,18,19.
KLLN promoter methylation analysis
KLLN promoter methylation analysis was performed on 228 patients using Sequenom MassArray Assay. Sodium bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA was performed following manufacturer’s protocol of EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA) using 750 ng in 50 μl of distilled water and M-Dilution Buffer. The treated samples were re-suspended in 30 μl of M-Elution Buffer and stored at −20°C. Bisulfite treated genomic DNA then subjected to PCR amplication, in vitro transcription and analyzed using Homogeneous MassCLEAVE (hMC) base-specific cleavage and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS as previously described20–22. Positive (very high methylation) and negative (0 to very low methylation) controls are run with each batch for Sequenom analysis. We also QC by selecting random samples for bisulfite sequencing. The resultant methylation calls were performed by the EpiTyper software v1.0 (Sequenom) to generate quantitative results for each CpG site. We analysed methylation levels at 9 informative CpGs amongst the 33 existing CpGs within the region from −1577 to −1907. The average methylation was calculated as a mean value of the CpGs’ methylation value for the 9 CpGs and expressed as percent methylation. Only those with complete methylation information at all 9 CpGs were included in the analysis. KLLN methylation status was expressed as a categorical variable (either positive or negative for methylation). Those with average methylation ≥ 90th percentile were considered as having positive KLLN promoter methylation. In this study, average methylation of 25% or more met the above criteria and chosen as a cutoff to call positive KLLN promoter methylation.
Analysis of PTEN protein by immunoblotting
Human immortalized lymphoblast-derived cell lines were obtained from each patient and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum. All cell lines were cultured at 37 C and 5% CO2. Whole-cell lysates were prepared with mammalian protein extraction reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Protein lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose. Antibodies used included anti-PTEN mouse monoclonal (Cascade Biosciences, Portland, OR) at 1:5000, anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase rabbit monoclonal (Cell Signaling) at 1:20,000, and anti-actin mouse monoclonal (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1:20,000. The blots were scanned digitally with the Odyssey imaging system (Li-Cor Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE). Detected fluorescence intensities for protein bands were background adjusted and normalized between gels with the median expression of individual proteins on each blot. Blood PTEN protein levels were classified as PTENQ1-4. PTENQ1 corresponds to the lowest quartile of PTEN expression seen and PTENQ4 being the highest.
Statistical analysis
Associations between categorical and continuous covariates were assessed using Chi Square test, Welch t-test and ANOVA test. Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. All tests of significance were at the p<0.05 level, and p-values were two-tailed. R-Studio, integrated development environment for R (version 0.97.551, Boston, MA) was used for the statistical analysis.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics
Three hundred and seventy-one CS/CSL patients with endometrial cancer (EC) were eligible. Median age was 54 years (21–88; Table 2). Histologies include endometrioid in 156 (42%), serous/clear cell 19 (5%), mucinous 1 (0.3%), sarcoma 10 (2.7%) and not otherwise specified/unknown 185 (50%). At least one uterine fibroid was present in 37.5% of the entire cohort (139/371). More than half of our cohort (226/371) had prevalent breast cancer. Mean CC score was 9.3 (range 1–69).
Table 2.
Variable | N (%) | |
---|---|---|
Age | Mean Median Range <30 years 30–50 years >50 years |
53 years 54 years (21–88) 16 (5%) 110 (33%) 204 (62%) |
Histology | Endometrioid Serous/clear cell Mucinous Sarcoma NOS*/Unknown |
156 (42%) 19 (5%) 1 (0.3%) 10 (2.7%) 185 (50%) |
Race | White African American Asian Others Unknown |
218 (59%) 9 (2.4%) 8 (2.2%) 21 (5.7%) 115 (31%) |
Uterine fibroid | Yes No |
139 (37.5%) 232 (62.5%) |
Breast Cancer | Yes No |
226 (61%) 145 (39%) |
Renal cancer | Yes No |
18 (5%) 352 (95%) |
Thyroid cancer | Yes No |
51 (13.7%) 320 (86.3%) |
Macrocephaly | Yes No |
84 (22.6%) 287 (77.4%) |
Cleveland Clinic Score | Mean | 9.3 (1–69) |
PTEN protein level | 1 2 3 4 |
69 (27.7%) 59 (23.7%) 60 (24.1%) 61 (24.5%) |
Not otherwise specified
Frequency of germline PTEN mutation or variation and associated clinical features
Of 371 patients, 26 (7%) have germline pathogenic PTEN mutation (PTEN_mut+), 19 (5%) have VUS (PTEN_VUS), and the remaining 326 (88%) have no mutation or VUS (PTEN_mut−). Clinical characteristics of CS/CSL patients with EC stratified by germline PTEN mutation status are listed in table 3. PTEN_mut+ participants were younger than those with PTEN_VUS and PTEN_mut− (mean age 44 vs. 52 vs. 54 years, p<0.001) with almost ¾ of PTEN_mut+ presenting at age ≤ 50 years compared to PTEN_VUS and PTEN_mut− patients (p=0.006, Table 3). PTEN_mut+ individuals had higher mean CC score compared to PTEN_VUS and PTEN_mut− patients (30 vs. 6.7 vs. 7.7, p<0.001).
Table 3.
Variable |
PTEN mut+ EC n=26 |
PTEN mut− EC n=326 |
PTEN_VUS EC# n=19 |
Global p-value | Pairwise p-value* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Mean <30 year old 30–50 years > 50 years |
44.2 (21–69) 3 (12%) 15 (60%) 7 (28%) |
53.9 (15.6–88) 13 (5%) 89 (31%) 184 (64%) |
52 (30.5–68.7) 0 6 (32%) 13 (68%) |
<0.001 0.006 |
<0.001 0.001 |
Histology | Endometrioid Serous/clear cell Mucinous Sarcoma NOS**/Unknown |
17 (65%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 8 (31%) |
130 (40%) 18 (6%) 0 (0%) 10 (3%) 168 (51%) |
44 (47%) 1 (5%) 0 0 35 (47%) |
<0.001 | <0.001 |
Race | White African American Asian Others Unknown |
19 (73%) 0 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 4 (15%) |
191 (59%) 8 (3%) 7 (2%) 18 (6%) 102 (31%) |
8 (90%) 1 (5%) 0 1 (5%) 9 (47%) |
0.35 | |
Uterine Fibroid |
Yes No/ unknown |
12 (46%) 14 (54%) |
118 (36%) 208 (64%) |
9 (47%) 10 (53%) |
0.39 | |
Breast Cancer | Yes No/ unknown |
14 (54%) 12 (46%) |
201 (62%) 125 (38%) |
11 (58%) 32 (42%) |
0.70 | |
Renal cancer | Yes No/ unknown |
5 (19%) 21 (81%) |
13 (4%) 312 (96%) |
0 19 (100%) |
0.001 | 0.006 |
Thyroid cancer | Yes No/ unknown |
4 (15%) 22 (85%) |
44 (14%) 282 (86%) |
3 (16%) 16 (84%) |
0.93 | |
Macrocephaly | YES No/Unknown |
20 (77%) 6 (23%) |
61 (19%) 265 (81%) |
3 (16%) 16 (84%) |
<0.001 | <0.001 |
Cleveland Clinic Score |
Mean Median |
30 29 |
7.7 7 |
6.7 7 |
<0.001 | <0.001 |
PTEN protein level | PTEN Q1 PTEN Q2 PTEN Q3 PTEN Q4 |
10 (62.5%) 4 (25%) 0 (0%) 2 (12.5%) |
57 (25%) 53 (24%) 56 (25%) 59 (26%) |
2 (25%) 2 (25%) 4 (50%) 0 (0%) |
0.01 | 0.005 |
Pairwise p-value comparing only those with germline PTEN mutation and those with no mutations or VUS. This test was done only in situations when global p-value was significant (<0.05).
VUS: variants of unknown significance
Not otherwise specified
The blood PTEN protein expression score was analyzed. 62.5% of PTEN_mut+ individuals had PTENQ1 compared to ~25% each for PTEN_VUS and PTEN_mut− patients (p=0.01).
PTEN_mut+ individuals were more likely to have macrocephaly than PTEN_VUS and PTEN_mut− patients (77% vs. 16% vs. 19%, p<0.001). There was no difference in distribution of uterine fibroids, or breast and thyroid cancers when stratified by germline PTEN mutation status (Table 3). Interestingly, the proportion of PTEN_mut+ individuals who also had renal cancer was higher than PTEN_VUS and PTEN_mut− patients (19% vs. 0% vs. 4% respectively, p=0.001).
Significant clinical predictors for germline PTEN mutation included age ≤ 50 years (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.4–26.2, p=0.015 for age <30 years and OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.7–11.2, p=0.001 for age 30–50 years), having macrocephaly (OR 14.4, 95% CI 5.6–37.6, p<0.001), higher CC score (OR 1.35 for 1 unit increment in CC score, 95% CI 1.2–1.5, p<0.001), PTENQ1 compared to PTENQ4 (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.1–4.6, p=0.039) and having renal cancer (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.86–17.55, p=0.002).
Germline SDHB/C/D variation and associated clinical features
Of 367 patients analyzed for SDHx variation, 36 (9.8%) were found to have germline SDHB/C/D variation. No difference in the frequency of germline SDHB/C/D variation was found between PTEN_mut+ and PTEN_mut− patients (9.1% vs. 9.2%, p=0.9). Six variants were identified (Table 4). Of these, 5 have been reported in our prior studies7 and a new SDHD variant (c.278A>G, p.Tyr93Cys) was detected in two patients with no germline PTEN mutation. Both patients were African American and diagnosed with breast and endometrial cancers. There was no difference in clinical characteristics when stratified by germline SDHB/C/D variation status (Table 5).
Table 4.
Variant | N | ||
---|---|---|---|
PTEN mut+ N=26 (2/22=9%) |
SDHB | c.487T>C, p.Ser163Pro | 2 |
PTEN mut- or VUS n=345 (34/345=10%) |
SDHB | c.487T>C, p.Ser163Pro c.8C>G, p.Ala3Gly |
16 1 |
SDHC | c.430G>C, p.Glu144Gln | 5 | |
SDHD | c.278A>G, p.Tyr93Cys c.149A>G, p.His50Arg c.34G>A, p.Gly12Ser |
2 6 6 |
Table 5.
Variable | SDHx variant Negative N=331 | SDHx variant Positive N=36 | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Mean Range |
53.0 21–88 |
55.0 21–86 |
0.36 |
Histology | Endometrioid Serous/clear cell Mucinous Sarcoma NOS*/Unknown |
139 (42%) 15 (5%) 1 (0.3%) 9 (3%) 167 (51%) |
14 (39%) 4 (11%) 0 1 (3%) 17 (47%) |
0.69 |
Race | White African American Asian Other Unknown |
195 (59%) 7 (2%) 8 (2%) 19 (6%) 102 (31%) |
22 (61%) 2 (6%) 0 2 (6%) 10 (28%) |
0.63 |
Uterine Fibroid | Yes No/unknown |
121 (37%) 210 (63%) |
16 (44%) 20 (56%) |
0.45 |
Breast Cancer | Yes No/unknown |
202 (61%) 129 (39%) |
23 (64%) 13 (36%) |
0.73 |
Renal cancer | Yes No/unknown |
15 (5%) 315 (95%) |
2 (6%) 34 (94%) |
0.73 |
Thyroid cancer | Yes No Unknown |
46 (14%) 285 (86%) |
5 (14%) 31 (86%) |
0.99 |
Macrocephaly | Yes No |
75 (23%) 256 (77%) |
5 (14%) 31 (86%) |
0.31 |
Cleveland Clinic Score |
Mean Median |
9.1 7 |
7.8 6 |
0.38 |
PTEN protein level | PTEN Q1 PTEN Q2 PTEN Q3 PTEN Q4 |
59 (26%) 55 (25%) 54 (23%) 56 (25%) |
8 (36%) 4 (18%) 6 (27%) 4 (18%) |
0.67 |
Not otherwise specified
Germline KLLN promoter methylation and associated clinical features
Of the 371 eligible patients, 228 were completely informative at the analyzed CpGs. Among them, 24 (10.5%) were found to have germline KLLN promoter methylation. The prevalence of germline KLLN promoter methylation among PTEN_mut+ was higher than that in PTEN_mut− patients (13% vs. 9.0%). However, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.16). Patients with germline KLLN promoter methylation were a mean 8 years younger than those with no germline KLLN promoter methylation (mean age 44 vs. 52, p=0.018). Further, patients with germline KLLN promoter methylation had significantly higher mean CC score compared to those with no germline KLLN promoter methylation (14 vs. 10.6, p=0.01). There was no difference in other clinical characteristics when stratified by germline KLLN promoter methylation status (Table 5).
Clinical predictors of germline KLLN promoter methylation are younger age (OR 1.25 for each 5 years younger, 95% CI 1.04–1.50, p=0.015) and higher CC score (OR 1.03 for 1 unit increment in CC score, 95% CI 0.99–1.07, p=0.09).
Discussion
Cowden syndrome has only recently joined Lynch syndrome whereby endometrial cancer is recognized as an important component. However, this cancer has not been systematically studied in patients with Cowden and Cowden-Like syndromes. Our study represents the first and largest investigating the prevalence of germline PTEN, SDHB-D and KLLN alterations and associated demographic and clinical characteristics in CS/CSL patients with endometrial cancer. It is clinically important to identify which subset(s) of endometrial cancer patients actually have CS/CSL defined by each of these genes and to determine gene-specific other cancer risks to inform risk sub-stratification and referral to high risk professionals.
We recently have shown that patients with germline PTEN mutations have an increased lifetime risk of endometrial cancer2. Here, we sought to determine whether demographic or clinical features in endometrial cancer presentations with CSL features can predict a priori a higher likelihood of harboring a PTEN mutation, to signal referral for genetic evaluation. Here, we show that age<50, macrocephaly, high CC score and/or prevalent or synchronous renal cell carcinoma could predict for germline PTEN mutation. Similar to our observations in CS-associated thyroid cancer23, we were able to associate low blood PTEN protein levels with a higher likelihood of harboring germline PTEN mutation. The odds of someone with PTENQ1 expression having an underlying germline PTEN mutation is 5.1-fold greater than in those who had PTENQ4 expression. Arguably, this might be a straightforward screening assay in the clinical setting. However, one limitation of this study is the absence of a normal range for blood PTEN protein expression levels. Nonetheless, any one or more of these five factors in a patient with endometrial cancer should prompt a healthcare provider to refer her for cancer genetics evaluation for consideration of PTEN-related CS. We also found that the mean age of endometrial cancer diagnosis in those with PTEN mutations was 44 years, with three-quarters diagnosed under 50. This observation may guide age-range for consideration of surveillance or prophylactic surgery.
In our previous small highly selected pilot series identifying germline KLLN methylation in CS/CSL susceptibility, we could not detect an increased snap-shot prevalence of endometrial cancer in those with KLLN methylation compared to PTEN-related CS/CSL6. We now show in this large prospective unselected series that the average age at diagnosis with endometrial cancer in both PTEN-mutation and KLLN promoter methylation carriers are similar, compared to SDHx where their average age is close to that of sporadic cases. Until further data, the surveillance recommendations for the uterus in KLLN-associated CS/CSL should be similar to those of PTEN-associated CS/CSL. Similar to those with PTEN germline mutations, younger age at endometrial cancer diagnosis and high CC score help to a priori predict the presence of germline KLLN methylation.
The PTEN Cleveland Clinic (CC) scoring system was created as a semi-quantitative weighted risk calculator derived by logistic regression approach taking into account presence or absence of a series of CS type features and ages of onset in our prospective CSL cohort compared to the features in the general community3. The CC score was validated in an independent series and outperformed the NCCN criteria. Strictly speaking, the CC score gives a priori probability of finding a germline PTEN mutation given the presence or absence of certain clinical features. As such, it could be surprising that a high CC score predicted for KLLN methylation. Notwithstanding, the CC score also reflects CS-type phenotypic load and earlier age of onset of the phenotype. In contrast to PTEN and KLLN, none of the demographic or clinical features or CC score was particularly associated with germline SDHx variation. These observations together may suggest that while PTEN and KLLN associate with similar phenotypes, SDHx does not, or may be more of a modifier7,24. In fact, SDHx variation has an important modifying effect on PTEN mutation, associated with increased prevalence of breast and thyroid carcinomas, compared to PTEN mutation alone7,24.
Endometrioid endometrial cancer is the most prevalent histologic type in the general population. Our data in this study confirm that endometrioid histology is also the most prevalent histologic type in CS/CSL patients with endometrial cancer including PTEN mutation positive individuals. Similarly, histological distribution of endometrial cancer in CS/CSL patients with germline SDHB-D or KLLN alterations were similar to that of the general population.
Our study is limited by lack of central pathology review of all endometrial cancer cases and lack of information on histology in a significant fraction of our cohort. However, it has several strengths including its prospective nature, large sample size, and cases originating from both academic and community settings. All cases were reviewed by a specialized cancer genetic specialist and well trained cancer-specialist genetic counselors. Further, all genetic testing was performed in one laboratory using standardized protocols. This study represents the first and largest study to date investigating the spectra of germline alteration of these five genes in CS/CSL patients with endometrial cancer.
In conclusion, identifying CS-related endometrial cancer is important at both individual and family levels in terms of future cancer screening and prevention. However, predicting such patients is often difficult and can be easily missed by the treating oncologists. Our study provides information about gene-specific CS-related endometrial cancer that can be utilized by all oncologists or other clinicians who provide care to patients with endometrial cancer. We identified clinical features predictive of germline PTEN mutation among patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Presence of one or more of these clinical features should alert the treating physician to potential heritable risk for referral to genetic counseling and cancer risk management. Further, endometrial cancer patients with germline KLLN promoter methylation are likely to have increased phenotypic load and present at younger ages, akin to those of germline PTEN mutation. Thus, high-risk cancer surveillance and prophylactic surgery of the uterus may be considered for KLLN-Me+ patients similar to those with PTEN mutations. Based on our data, given the later age of onset in CS and CSL patients with SDHB-D variations, the recommendation for these patients might be different and warrant further investigation.
Table 6.
Variable |
KLLN_Me+ N=24 |
KLLN_Me− N=204 |
p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Mean Range |
44 21–66 |
52 21–86 |
0.018 |
Histology | Endometrioid Serous/clear cell Mucinous Sarcoma NOS*/Unknown |
6 (25%) 1 (4%) 0 0 17 (71%) |
87 (17%) 8 (4%) 0 1 (1%) 105 (51%) |
0.35 |
Race | White African American Asian Other Unknown |
12 (50%) 0 0 2 (8%) 10 (42%) |
106 (52%) 3 (2%) 5 (3%) 13 (6%) 77 (38%) |
0.88 |
Uterine Fibroid | Yes No/unknown |
8 (33%) 16 (67%) |
73 (36%) 131 (64%) |
0.8 |
Breast Cancer | Yes No/unknown |
13 (54%) 11 (46%) |
122 (60%) 82 (40%) |
0.75 |
Renal cancer | Yes No/unknown |
3 (12.5%) 21 (87.5%) |
10 (5%) 194 (95%) |
0.12 |
Thyroid cancer | Yes No/ Unknown |
5 (21%) 19 (79%) |
28 (14%) 176 (86%) |
0.52 |
Macrocephaly | Yes No |
10 (42%) 14 (58%) |
53 (26%) 151 (74%) |
0.10 |
Cleveland Clinic score | Mean Median |
14 16 |
10.5 8 |
0.01 |
PTEN protein level | PTEN Q1 PTEN Q2 PTEN Q3 PTEN Q4 |
6 (33%) 3 (17%) 6 (33%) 3 (17%) |
47 (31%) 35 (23%) 39 (26%) 31 (20%) |
0.85 |
Not otherwise specified
Acknowledgments
Funding
This study is funded in part by grant 2P01CA124570-07 from the National Cancer Institute (to CE). EAN is funded by NCI fellowship 1F30CA168151-01A1. JN is an Ambrose Monell Foundation Cancer Genomic Medicine Fellow at the Cleveland Clinic Genomic Medicine Institute; CE is the Sondra J. and Stephen R. Hardis Chair of Cancer Genomic Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic and an ACS Clinical Research Professor.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tan MH, Mester JL, Ngeow J, et al. Lifetime cancer risks in individuals with germline PTEN mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:400–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tan MH, Mester J, Peterson C, et al. A clinical scoring system for selection of patients for PTEN mutation testing is proposed on the basis of a prospective study of 3042 probands. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marsh DJ, Coulon V, Lunetta KL, et al. Mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype analyses in Cowden disease and Bannayan-Zonana syndrome, two hamartoma syndromes with germline PTEN mutation. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:507–15. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.3.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nelen MR, Kremer H, Konings IB, et al. Novel PTEN mutations in patients with Cowden disease: absence of clear genotype-phenotype correlations. Eur J Hum Genet. 1999;7:267–73. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bennett KL, Mester J, Eng C. Germline epigenetic regulation of KILLIN in Cowden and Cowden-like syndrome. JAMA. 2010;304:2724–31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ni Y, He X, Chen J, et al. Germline SDHx variants modify breast and thyroid cancer risks in Cowden and Cowden-like syndrome via FAD/NAD-dependant destabilization of p53. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:300–10. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, et al. Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1459–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Astuti D, Latif F, Dallol A, et al. Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:49–54. doi: 10.1086/321282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287:848–51. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Niemann S, Muller U. Mutations in SDHC cause autosomal dominant paraganglioma, type 3. Nat Genet. 2000;26:268–70. doi: 10.1038/81551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eng C, Thiele H, Zhou XP, et al. PTEN mutations and proteus syndrome. Lancet. 2001;358:2079–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07110-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Van der Stoep N, van Paridon CD, Janssens T, et al. Diagnostic guidelines for high-resolution melting curve (HRM) analysis: an interlaboratory validation of BRCA1 mutation scanning using the 96-well LightScanner. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:899–909. doi: 10.1002/humu.21004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, et al. Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gnf056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Teresi RE, Zbuk KM, Pezzolesi MG, et al. Cowden syndrome-affected patients with PTEN promoter mutations demonstrate abnormal protein translation. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:756–67. doi: 10.1086/521051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou XP, Waite KA, Pilarski R, et al. Germline PTEN promoter mutations and deletions in Cowden/Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome result in aberrant PTEN protein and dysregulation of the phosphoinositol-3-kinase/Akt pathway. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:404–11. doi: 10.1086/377109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Buxbaum JD, Cai G, Chaste P, et al. Mutation screening of the PTEN gene in patients with autism spectrum disorders and macrocephaly. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2007;144B:484–91. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McWhinney SR, Pilarski RT, Forrester SR, et al. Large germline deletions of mitochondrial complex II subunits SDHB and SDHD in hereditary paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:5694–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mutter GL, Lin MC, Fitzgerald JT, et al. Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:924–30. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.11.924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Coolen MW, Statham AL, Gardiner-Garden M, et al. Genomic profiling of CpG methylation and allelic specificity using quantitative high-throughput mass spectrometry: critical evaluation and improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:e119. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ehrich M, Nelson MR, Stanssens P, et al. Quantitative high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation patterns by base-specific cleavage and mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15785–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507816102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ghosh S, Yates AJ, Fruhwald MC, et al. Tissue specific DNA methylation of CpG islands in normal human adult somatic tissues distinguishes neural from non-neural tissues. Epigenetics. 2010;5:527–38. doi: 10.4161/epi.5.6.12228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ngeow J, He X, Mester JL, et al. Utility of PTEN protein dosage in predicting for underlying germline PTEN mutations among patients presenting with thyroid cancer and Cowden-like phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E2320–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ni Y, Zbuk KM, Sadler T, et al. Germline mutations and variants in the succinate dehydrogenase genes in Cowden and Cowden-like syndromes. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:261–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]