Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2015 Feb 24;10(2):e0116865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116865

Fluorescence-Guided Surgery of Retroperitoneal-Implanted Human Fibrosarcoma in Nude Mice Delays or Eliminates Tumor Recurrence and Increases Survival Compared to Bright-Light Surgery

Fuminari Uehara 1,2,3, Yukihiko Hiroshima 1,2, Shinji Miwa 1,2, Yasunori Tome 1,2,3, Shuya Yano 1,2, Mako Yamamoto 1, Yasunori Matsumoto 2, Hiroki Maehara 3, Kazuhiro Tanaka 3, Michael Bouvet 2, Fuminori Kanaya 3, Robert M Hoffman 1,2,*
Editor: Shree Ram Singh4
PMCID: PMC4339719  PMID: 25710463

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine if fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) can eradicate human fibrosarcoma growing in the retroperitoneum of nude mice. One week after retroperitoneal implantation of human HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells, expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) (HT-1080-GFP), in nude mice, bright-light surgery (BLS) was performed on all tumor-bearing mice (n = 22). After BLS, mice were randomized into 2 treatment groups; BLS-only (n = 11) or the combination of BLS + FGS (n = 11). The residual tumors remaining after BLS were resected with FGS using a hand-held portable imaging system under fluorescence navigation. The average residual tumor area after BLS + FGS was significantly smaller than after BLS-only (0.4 ± 0.4 mm2 and 10.5 ± 2.4 mm2, respectively; p = 0.006). Five weeks after surgery, the fluorescent-tumor areas of BLS- and BLS + FGS-treated mice were 379 ± 147 mm2 and 11.7 ± 6.9 mm2, respectively, indicating that FGS greatly inhibited tumor recurrence compared to BLS. The combination of BLS + FGS significantly decreased fibrosarcoma recurrence compared to BLS-only treated mice (p < 0.001). Mice treated with BLS+FGS had a significantly higher disease-free survival rate than mice treated with BLS-only at five weeks after surgery. These results suggest that combination of BLS + FGS significantly reduced the residual fibrosarcoma volume after BLS and improved disease-free survival.

Introduction

Most tumors in the retroperitoneum are malignant, and about one third of these are soft tissue sarcomas [1, 2]. Retroperitoneal tumors present several therapeutic challenges because of their relative late presentation and anatomical location [3]. Complete tumor resection can potentially be a curative treatment modality for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma patients [4], but local recurrence occurs in a large proportion of patients and is responsible for as many as 75% of sarcoma-related deaths [5].

Local recurrence often occurs following attempted curative resection of the primary tumor, because all cancer cells are not removed by the surgeon due to the inability to see them. Making tumors fluorescence offers great advantages for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) to achieve complete resection [6].

Our laboratory has developed FGS of cancer using both fluorescent-protein labeling of the tumor [716] as well as fluorescent-antibody labeling of the tumor [1729], in orthotopic nude mouse models of human tumors, including patient-derived orthotopic (PDOX) models [24, 25, 30].

In the present study, we report the effectiveness of using FGS to improve outcomes in a retroperitoneal-implanted nude-mouse model of human fibrosarcoma, including reducing residual tumor tissue, thereby decreasing tumor recurrence and increasing disease-free survival.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All animal studies were conducted with an AntiCancer Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)-protocol specifically approved for this study and in accordance with the principals and procedures outlined in the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Animals under Assurance Number A3873-1. In order to minimize any suffering of the animals the use of anesthesia and analgesics were used for all surgical experiments. Animals were anesthetized with a 20 μL mixture of ketamine (20 mg/kg), acepromazine (0.48 mg/kg), and xylazine (15.2 mg/kg) by intramuscular injection 10 minutes before surgery. The response of animals during surgery was monitored to ensure adequate depth of anesthesia. Ibuprofen (7.5 mg/kg orally in drinking water every 24 hours for 7 days post-surgery) was used in order to provide analgesia post-operatively in the surgically-treated animals. The animals were observed on a daily basis and humanely sacrificed by CO2 inhalation when they met the following humane endpoint criteria: prostration, skin lesions, significant body weight loss, difficulty breathing, epistaxis, rotational motion and body temperature drop. The use of animals was necessary to understand the in vivo efficacy, in particular, anti-metastatic efficacy of the procedures tested. Animals were housed with no more than 5 per cage. Animals were housed in a barrier facility on a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered rack under standard conditions of 12-hour light/dark cycles. The animals were fed an autoclaved laboratory rodent diet (S1 ARRIVE Checklist).

Establishment of a green fluorescent protein labeled HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cell line

For green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene transduction of human HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells [31, 32], 80% confluent cells were used. Briefly, cells were incubated with a 1:1 precipitated mixture of retroviral supernatants, of packaging PT67-GFP cells [3335], which express the GFP gene linked to the G418 resistance gene (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) and RPMI 1640 medium (Cellgro, Herndon, VA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Omega Scientific, San Diego, CA, USA) for 72 h. Fresh medium was replenished at this time. Cells were harvested with trypsin/EDTA 72 h post-transduction and subcultured at a ratio of 1:15 into medium, which contained 200 μg/ml of the selective agent G418. The level of G418 was increased stepwise up to 800 μg/ml [3335].

Cell culture

HT1080-GFP cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air and harvested by trypcinization at 80% confluence.

Mice

Athymic nu/nu nude mice (AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA) were used in this study. Mice were kept in a barrier facility under HEPA filtration. Mice were fed with an autoclaved laboratory rodent diet. All mouse surgical procedures and imaging were performed with the animals anesthetized by subcutaneous injection of the ketamine mixture described above (20 μl).

All animal studies were conducted with an AntiCancer Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)-protocol specifically approved for this study and in accordance with the principals and procedures outlined in the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Animals under Assurance Number A3873-1.

Retroperitoneal implantation of HT1080-GFP cells

Four-week-old female nude mice were anesthetized by the ketamine mixture via s.c. injection. The back was sterilized with alcohol. An approximately 1 cm skin incision was made just to the right side of spine in order to expose the retroperitoneum. HT1080-GFP cells (1×106) in Matrigel (5 μl) (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) per mouse were injected into the retroperitoneum with a 0.5 ml 28 G latex-free insulin syringe (TYCO Health Group LP, Mansfield, MA). The skin was closed with a 6-0 suture.

Fluorescence imaging

The Olympus OV100 Small Animal Imaging System (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan), containing an MT-20 light source (Olympus Biosystems, Planegg, Germany) and DP70 CCD camera (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) [36]; the Dino-Lite imaging system (AM4113T-GFBW Dino-Lite Premier; AnMo Electronics Corporation, Taiwan) [30]; and the MVX10 long-working distance microscope (Olympus Corp.) [37] were used for imaging live mice. To analyze for recurrence and to follow tumor progression postoperatively, weekly noninvasive whole-body imaging of the mice was performed using the iBox Scientia Small Animal Imaging System (UVP LLC, Upland, CA, USA). GFP fluorescent-tumor areas were recorded every week [16, 3840]. The working-distance setting for GFP imaging in the iBox was adjusted to image the maximum possible fluorescent area in each mouse both before surgery and after surgery. All images were analyzed with ImageJ v1.440 (National Institutes of Health).

Tumor resection

One week after retroperitoneal implantation of HT1080-GFP cells, bright-light surgery (BLS) was performed to all tumor-bearing mice (n = 22). The exposed retroperitoneal tumor was imaged preoperatively with the OV100 at a magnification of 0.14×. Resection of the primary tumor was performed under standard bright-field using the MVX10 microscope [37]. For fibrosarcoma resection, intralesional and marginal tumor excision was performed in all the mice. Postoperatively, the surgical resection bed was imaged with the OV100 at a magnification of 0.14× or 0.56× to detect residual tumor. The mice which underwent BLS were randomized into 2 treatment groups: BLS only (n = 11) and BLS + FGS (n = 11) (Fig. 1). The residual tumors of the BLS + FGS group of mice were resected using the Dino-Lite imaging system under fluorescence navigation. After completion of FGS, the surgical resection bed was imaged with the OV100 at a magnification of 0.14× or 0.89× to detect microscopic minimal residual cancer (MRC) [41]. The incision was closed in one layer using 6-0 nylon surgical sutures after treatment.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental protocol.

Figure 1

One week after retroperitoneal fibrosarcoma implantation in 22 mice, the tumor-bearing mice were randomly assigned to either the BLS-only or BLS + FGS groups. Resection of the tumor was performed using the Dino-Lite imaging system under fluorescence navigation (14). Postoperatively, the surgical resection bed was imaged with the OV100 at a magnification of 0.14× or 0.56× to detect residual fibrosarcoma cells.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University). Residual tumor area is expressed as mean ± SD. The two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables between 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for demonstrating mouse survival. Survival outcomes were compared using log rank tests. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

Efficacy of bright-light and bright-light plus fluorescence-guided surgery

Retroperitoneal mouse models of HT-1080-GFP human fibrosarcoma were established in 22 mice (Fig. 2A). One week after retroperitoneal implantation, the mice were randomly divided into the BLS or BLS + FGS groups (11 mice in each group) (Fig. 1). Before surgical resection, the fluorescent-tumor areas of the mice in the BLS and BLS + FGS groups were 41.3 ± 15.4 mm2 and 47.9 ± 30.6 mm2, respectively (Fig. 2B). There was no significant difference in pre-operative tumor burden between BLS and BLS + FGS mice. A great improvement in visualization of the primary fibrosarcoma during FGS enhanced distinction of tumor from surrounding soft tissues and identified a larger extent of tumor growth due to GFP expression by the tumor (Fig. 3A). FGS following BLS resulted in a more complete resection of the fibrosarcoma, demonstrated by a significant decrease in the fluorescent area of the residual tumor compared to BLS-only. Fluorescent areas of the residual tumors after BLS and the combination of BLS + FGS were 10.5 ± 2.4 mm2 and 0.4 ± 0.4 mm2, respectively (Fig. 3B; p = 0.00597).

Figure 2. Pre-operative images of retroperitoneal fibrosarcoma mouse model.

Figure 2

A. Retroperitoneal fibrosarcoma mouse model. B. Fluorescent-tumor areas before surgery. There was no significant difference in fluorescent-tumor areas between the BLS-only and BLS + FGS mouse groups. The fluorescent areas of tumors are expressed mean ± SD. All residual tumors expressing GFP were imaged with the Olympus OV100 Small Animal Imaging System (Olympus Corp.) [36] and analyzed with ImageJ v1.440 (National Institutes of Health). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.

Figure 3. Pre-operative and post-operative images of retroperitoneal fibrosarcoma.

Figure 3

A. Pre- and post-operative images of mice in the BLS-only and BLS + FGS groups. Upper panels are bright-field (BF), middle panels show GFP tumor fluorescence, and lower panels show merged images. The residual tumor after BLS-only was clearly detected with the OV100 at a magnification of 0.56×. The residual tumor after BLS + FGS was marginally detected with the OV100. Fluorescent area of residual tumor after BLS-only and BLS + FGS. Fluorescent areas of residual tumors in BLS-only and BLS + FGS group were 10.5 ± 2.4 mm2 and 0.4 ± 0.4 mm2, respectively. The residual tumor area after BLS + FGS was significantly smaller than after BLS-only. All images were measured for residual tumor areas using ImageJ. * p < 0.01. B. Bar graphs show the percent of the original tumor remaining after either BLS or the combination of BLS + FGS.

Time-course imaging of recurrent tumor growth after BLS or the combination of BLS + FGS

Time-lapse imaging visualized rapid growth of the fluorescent area in the BLS-only-treated mice after surgery (Fig. 4). Fluorescent-tumor areas of the mice treated with BLS-only rapidly increased, whereas mice treated with BLS + FGS had minimal tumor recurrence (Fig. 5). Five weeks after surgery, the fluorescent areas of BLS-only- and BLS + FGS-treated mice were 379 ± 147 mm2 and 11.7 ± 6.9 mm2, respectively (Fig. 5). The combination of BLS+FGS significantly decreased tumor recurrent more than BLS-only treated mice (p < 0.001).

Figure 4. Representative time-course imaging of tumor recurrence after BLS-only and the combination of BLS + FGS.

Figure 4

Fluorescence imaging, using the iBOX Scientia Small Animal Imaging System [34, 52, 53], showed BLS-only mice treated had tumor recurrence. In contrast, mice treated with the combination of BLS + FGS showed little recurrent tumor growth.

Figure 5. Extent of tumor recurrence after BLS-only or BLS+FGS. BLS-only treated mice had tumor recurrence.

Figure 5

BLS + FGS-treated mice had only minimal growth of recurrent tumors. Five weeks after surgery, the fluorescent-tumor areas of BLS-only- and BLS+FGS-treated mice were 379 ± 147 mm2 and 11.7 ± 6.9 mm2, respectively. The combination of BLS + FGS significantly decreased recurrence compared to BLS-only treated mice. * p < 0.001.

Disease-free survival (DFS) after BLS and BLS + FGS

Five-week DFS rates of BLS-only- and BLS + FGS-treated mice were 9.1% and 81.8%, respectively (Fig. 6). Mice treated with BLS + FGS had a significantly higher survival rate than mice treated with BLS-only (p < 0.005). These results further suggest that FGS significantly reduced the residual tumor volume after BLS and improved DFS.

Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier curve for disease-free survival (DFS).

Figure 6

Five-week DFS rates of BLS-only and BLS + FGS-treated mice were 9.1% and 81.8%, respectively. Mice treated with BLS + FGS had a significantly higher survival rate than mice treated with BLS-only (p < 0.005).

We have previously demonstrated the enhanced visualization and resection of primary and metastatic cancer labeled with GFP [716] or fluorescent antibodies [1729]. The results of these previous studies show the great potential of FGS. The present study demonstrates that FGS can be beneficial for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma to prevent recurrence of the tumor, a major current problem in the clinic. A possible translatable method to label the fibrosarcoma in the clinic could be with a GFP-containing, telomerase-dependence adenovirus which effectively and selectively labels tumors in mouse models, enabling FGS [79]. Another possibility could be the use of RNA-guided nano-sensors to specifically label cancer cells in vivo for FGS [42].

Supporting Information

S1 ARRIVE Checklist.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to the memory of A. R. Moossa, M.D.

Data Availability

Please note that all raw data necessary to replicate the findings and conclusions in our study are freely available in the paper.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute grant CA142669. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Jaques DP, Coit DG, Hajdu SI, Brennan MF (1990) Management of primary and recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum. Ann Surg 212:51–59. 10.1097/00000658-199007000-00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Karakousis CP, Gertenbluth R, Kontzoglou K, Driscoll DL (1995) Retroperitoneal sarcomas and their management. Arch Surg 130:1104–1109. 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430100082016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thway K, Moskovic EC, Fisher C, et al. (2010) Surgical management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Br J Surg 97:698–706. 10.1002/bjs.6994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lewis JJ, Leung D, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF (1998) Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: analysis of 500 patients treated and followed at a single institution. Ann Surg 228:355–365. 10.1097/00000658-199809000-00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bonvalot S, Rivoire M, Castaing M, Stoeckle E, Le Cesne A, et al. (2009) Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control. J Clin Oncol 27:31–37. 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bouvet M, Hoffman RM (2011) Glowing tumors make for better detection and resection. Sci Transl Med 3:110fs10 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kishimoto H, Zhao M, Hayashi K, Urata Y, Tanaka N, et al. (2009) In vivo internal tumor illumination by telomerase-dependent adenoviral GFP for precise surgical navigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:14514–14517. 10.1073/pnas.0906388106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kishimoto H, Urata Y, Tanaka N, Fujiwara T, Hoffman RM (2009) Selective metastatic tumor labeling with green fluorescent protein and killing by systemic administration of telomerase-dependent adenoviruses. Mol Cancer Therap 8:3001–3008. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kishimoto H, Aki R, Urata Y, Bouvet M, Momiyama M, et al. (2011) Tumor-selective adenoviral-mediated GFP genetic labeling of human cancer in the live mouse reports future recurrence after resection. Cell Cycle 10:2737–2741. 10.4161/cc.10.16.16756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Hardamon CR, Snyder CS, Pu M, et al. (2012) Fluorescence-guided surgery allows for more complete resection of pancreatic cancer, resulting in longer disease-free survival compared with standard surgery in orthotopic mouse models. J Am Coll Surg 215:126–136. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.02.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Momiyama M, Kumamoto T, Suetsugu A, Kishimoto H, Chishima T, et al. (2012) Major liver resection stimulates stromal recruitment and metastasis compared with repeated minor resection. J Surg Res 178:280–287. 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Snyder CS, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M (2013) Fluorescence-guided surgery of human colon cancer increases complete resection resulting in cures in an orthotopic nude mouse model. J Surg Res 179:87–93. 10.1016/j.jss.2012.08.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Momiyama M, Hiroshima Y, Suetsugu A, Tome Y, Mii S, et al. (2013) Enhanced resection of orthotopic red-fluorescent-protein-expressing human glioma by fluorescence-guided surgery in nude mice. Anticancer Res 33:107–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Sato S, Murakami T, Uehara F, et al. (2014) Hand-held high-resolution fluorescence imaging system for fluorescence-guided surgery of patient and cell-line pancreatic tumors growing orthotopically in nude mice. J Surg Res 187:510–517. 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Zhang Y, Sato S, Murakami T, et al. (2014) Fluorescence-guided surgery in combination with UVC irradiation cures metastatic human pancreatic cancer in orthotopic mouse models. PLoS One 9:e99977 10.1371/journal.pone.0099977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Miwa S, Matsumoto Y, Hiroshima Y, Yano S, Uehara F, et al. (2014) Fluorescence-guided surgery of prostate cancer bone metastasis. J Surg Res 192:124–133. 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. McElroy M, Kaushal S, Luiken G, Moossa AR, Hoffman RM, et al. (2008) Imaging of primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer using a fluorophore-conjugated anti-CA19-9 antibody for surgical navigation. World J Surg 32:1057–1066. 10.1007/s00268-007-9452-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kaushal S, McElroy MK, Luiken GA, Talamini MA, Moossa AR, et al. (2008) Fluorophore-conjugated anti-CEA antibody for the intraoperative imaging of pancreatic and colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1938–1950. 10.1007/s11605-008-0581-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Lee C, Hardamon CR, Snyder CS, et al. (2012) An LED light source and novel fluorophore combinations improve fluorescence laparoscopic detection of metastatic pancreatic cancer in orthotopic mouse models. J Am Coll Surg 214:997–1007. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wu J, Ma R, Cao H, Wang Z, Jing C, et al. (2013) Intraoperative imaging of metastatic lymph nodes using a fluorophore-conjugated antibody in a HER2/neu-expressing orthotopic breast cancer mouse model. Anticancer Res 33:419–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Maawy AA, Hiroshima Y, Kaushal S, Luiken GA, Hoffman RM, et al. (2013) Comparison of a chimeric anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody conjugated with visible or near-infrared fluorescent dyes for imaging pancreatic cancer in orthotopic nude mouse models. J Biomed Optics 18:126016 10.1117/1.JBO.18.12.126016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Metildi CA, Tang CM, Kaushal S, Leonard SY, Magistri P, et al. (2013) In vivo fluorescence imaging of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using fluorophore-conjugated anti-KIT antibody. Ann Surg Oncol Suppl 3:693–700. 10.1245/s10434-013-3172-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Pu M, Messer KA, Luiken GA, et al. (2014) Fluorescence-guided surgery with a fluorophore-conjugated antibody to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), that highlights the tumor, improves surgical resection and increases survival in orthotopic mouse models of human pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1405–1411. 10.1245/s10434-014-3495-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Luiken GA, Talamini MA, Hoffman RM, et al. (2014) Fluorescently-labeled chimeric anti-CEA antibody improves detection and resection of human colon cancer in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude mouse model. J Surg Oncol 109:451–458. 10.1002/jso.23507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Metildi CA, Zhang Y, Uehara F, et al. (2014) Successful fluorescence-guided surgery on human colon cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse models using a fluorophore-conjugated anti-CEA antibody and a portable imaging system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:241–247. 10.1089/lap.2013.0418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Luiken GA, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M (2014) Advantages of fluorescence-guided laparoscopic surgery of pancreatic cancer labeled with fluorescent anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibodies in an orthotopic mouse model. J Am Coll Surg 219:132–141. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Maawy A, Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Luiken GA, Hoffman RM, et al. (2014) Polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugations of chimeric anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) labeled with near infrared (NIR) dyes enhances imaging of liver metastases in a nude-mouse model of human colon cancer. PLoS One 9:e97965 10.1371/journal.pone.0097965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Maawy A, Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Luiken GA, Hoffman RM, et al. (2014) Specific tumor labeling enhanced by polyethylene glycol linkage of near infrared dyes conjugated to a chimeric anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody in a nude mouse model of human pancreatic cancer. J Biomed Optics 19:101504 10.1117/1.JBO.19.10.101504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Luiken GA, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M (2014) Advantages of fluorescence-guided laparoscopic surgery of pancreatic cancer labeled with fluorescent anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibodies in an orthotopic mouse model. J Am Coll Surg 219:132–141. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Sato S, Murakami T, Uehara F, et al. (2014) Hand-held high-resolution fluorescence imaging system for fluorescence-guided surgery of patient and cell-line pancreatic tumors growing orthotopically in nude mice. J Surg Res 187:510–517. 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Yamamoto N, Yang M, Jiang P, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, et al. (2003) Real-time GFP imaging of spontaneous HT-1080 fibrosarcoma lung metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 20:181–185. 10.1023/A:1022662927574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yamamoto N, Yang M, Jiang P, Xu M, Tsuchiya H, et al. (2003) Determination of clonality of metastasis by cell-specific color-coded fluorescent-protein imaging. Cancer Res 63:7785–7790. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Hoffman RM, Yang M (2006) Subcellular imaging in the live mouse. Nature Protoc 1:775–782. 10.1038/nprot.2006.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hoffman RM, Yang M (2006) Color-coded fluorescence imaging of tumor-host interactions. Nature Protoc 1:928–935. 10.1038/nprot.2006.119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hoffman RM, Yang M (2006) Whole-body imaging with fluorescent proteins. Nature Protoc 1:1429–1438. 10.1038/nprot.2006.223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Yamauchi K, Yang M, Jiang P, Xu M, Yamamoto N, et al. (2006) Development of real-time subcellular dynamic multicolor imaging of cancer-cell trafficking in live mice with a variable-magnification whole-mouse imaging system. Cancer Res 66:4208–4214. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kimura H, Momiyama M, Tomita K, Tsuchiya H, Hoffman RM (2010) Long-working-distance fluorescence microscope with high-numerical-aperture objectives for variable-magnification imaging in live mice from macro- to subcellular. J Biomed Optics 15:066029 10.1117/1.3526356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Zhang Y, Sato S, Murakami T, et al. (2014) Fluorescence-guided surgery in combination with UVC irradiation cures metastatic human pancreatic cancer in orthotopic mouse models. PLoS One 9:e99977 10.1371/journal.pone.0099977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Kimura H, Zhang L, Zhao M, Hayashi K, Tsuchiya H, et al. (2010) Targeted therapy of spinal cord glioma with a genetically-modified Salmonella typhimurium. Cell Prolif 43:41–48. 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2009.00652.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Miwa S, Yano S, Zhang Y, Matsumoto Y, Uehara F, et al. (2014) Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R prevents experimental human breast cancer bone metastasis in nude mice. Oncotarget 5:7119–7125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kimura H, Lee C, Hayashi K, Yamauchi K, Yamamoto N, et al. (2010) UV light killing efficacy of fluorescent protein-expressing cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biochem 110:1439–1446. 10.1002/jcb.22693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Glinsky GV (2013) RNA-guided diagnostics and therapeutics for next-generation inidividualized nanomedicine. J Clin Invest 123:2350–2352 10.1172/JCI69268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 ARRIVE Checklist.

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

Please note that all raw data necessary to replicate the findings and conclusions in our study are freely available in the paper.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES