Abstract
Birds of the order Anseriformes, commonly referred to as waterfowl, are frequently infected by Haemosporidia of the genera Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon via dipteran vectors. We analyzed nucleotide sequences of the Cytochrome b (Cytb) gene from parasites of these genera detected in six species of ducks from Alaska and California, USA to characterize the genetic diversity of Haemosporidia infecting waterfowl at two ends of the Pacific Americas Flyway. In addition, parasite Cytb sequences were compared to those available on a public database to investigate specificity of genetic lineages to hosts of the order Anseriformes. Haplotype and nucleotide diversity of Haemoproteus Cytb sequences was lower than was detected for Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon parasites. Although waterfowl are presumed to be infected by only a single species of Leucocytozoon, L. simondi, diversity indices were highest for haplotypes from this genus and sequences formed five distinct clades separated by genetic distances of 4.9%–7.6%, suggesting potential cryptic speciation. All Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon haplotypes derived from waterfowl samples formed monophyletic clades in phylogenetic analyses and were unique to the order Anseriformes with few exceptions. In contrast, waterfowl-origin Plasmodium haplotypes were identical or closely related to lineages found in other avian orders. Our results suggest a more generalist strategy for Plasmodium parasites infecting North American waterfowl as compared to those of the genera Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon.
Introduction
Haemosporidia is a diverse order of intracellular parasites that infect vertebrates as their intermediate hosts. Although human malarial parasites, such as Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax, are perhaps the most thoroughly researched and widely recognized taxa, haemosporidians have also been extensively studied in birds, thus facilitating our collective understanding of the complex life cycles of these parasites in vertebrate hosts[1]. Of all the haemosporidian parasites known to infect wild birds, perhaps the most studied are those belonging to the genera Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon. Parasites of these genera are transmitted to birds by dipteran vectors, specifically biting midges, mosquitos and black flies, respectively [1]. Infection may lead to clinical disease and even mortality in avian hosts [2,3]. Most infections are believed to be relatively benign [4,5], but sub-lethal effects of haemosporidian parasites in wild avian hosts are not well-understood.
Since the discovery of avian haemosporidians in 1884, the characterization of blood parasites has been largely accomplished through microscopy. Using such methods, at least 206 morphospecies have been described in avian hosts of 23 orders [1]. The highest parasite diversity (86 morphospecies) has been described in songbirds (order Passeriformes); in contrast, parasite diversity appears to be much lower in other avian taxa such as waterfowl (order Anseriformes), for whom 13 morphospecies of haemosporidians have been identified [1]. Of these 13 morphospecies, nine belong to the genus Plasmodium, three to Haemoproteus, and one to Leucocytozoon [1,6]. All but four of these morphospecies (three belonging to the genus Plasmodium and one classified as Haemoproteus) have been previously described in North America [1,6].
Molecular methodologies are increasingly being used to characterize haemosporidian infections in wild birds [7], although application of molecular methods to investigate parasites in some host taxa, such as waterfowl, is still limited. Genetic data from the relatively few molecular studies of haemosporidians in North American waterfowl suggest that genetic diversity of Leucocytozoon parasites at the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Cytb gene may be greater than for Haemoproteus and Plasmodium parasites [8–10]. This result seemingly contradicts collective findings of microscopical investigations that have identified greater morphospecies diversity for the genera Haemoproteus and Plasmodium in Anseriformes birds.
Recent molecular studies of haemosporidian parasites in waterfowl also suggest that differences may exist in host ranges for parasites of different genera; such differences may be important with regard to parasite evolution and mechanisms of dispersal. Plasmodium Cytb lineages identified in ducks, swans and geese were found to be identical to parasites detected in diverse taxa including passerines, cranes, raptors and shorebirds [8,9,11–13], whereas Haemoproteus parasite haplotypes identified in waterfowl have only rarely been detected in non-Anseriformes taxa [12]. Leucocytozoon lineages identified for waterfowl parasites appear to be constrained solely to this taxon [8,9,13]. As such, additional genetic data obtained from haemosporidian parasites infecting a broad diversity of waterfowl over a large geographic range may be useful for better understanding the current distribution and genetic diversity of Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon parasites and determining the potential for waterfowl to redistribute parasites along migratory routes and among avian species.
In this study, we: (1) assess genetic diversity among three genera of blood parasites using waterfowl samples collected from six species of ducks at locations on opposite ends of the Pacific Flyway in North America, specifically in Alaska and California, USA, and (2) investigate host specificity by incorporating our data into a meta-analysis using parasite lineages derived from numerous avian taxa in order to better understand the distribution of parasites infecting wild waterfowl across space, time and host species. Results of this study will provide valuable baseline data for assessing potential changes of haemosporidian diversity and host-specificity through time as well as informing future efforts aiming to integrate microscopical and molecular parasitology.
Materials and Methods
Sample acquisition
From October 2006 to January 2007, wings from 860 hunter-shot ducks were collected from locations within the San Joaquin and Sacramento valleys of California (various sampling locations near 37° 3′ N, 120° 51′ W, and 39° 31′ N, 122° 12′ W). Whole blood samples from 1,347 live-trapped ducks were collected from May to August, 2010 on the Minto Flats State Game Refuge in interior Alaska (various sampling locations near 64° 53′ N, 148° 46′ W). Live captures were conducted under the authority of U.S. Fish and Wildlife permit # MB789758 in accordance with methods approved by the U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Animal Care and Use Committee (#2011–5). Four species of ducks were sampled at both locations: American Green-winged Teal (Anas crecca), American Wigeon (Anas americana), Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), and Northern Pintail (Anas acuta). In addition, Lesser Scaup (Athya affinis) blood was collected in Alaska and wings from Northern Shoveler (Anas clypeata) were collected in California. Samples were taken from males and females, and from hatch-year and after-hatch-year ducks at all locations.
Hematozoa detection and identification
Host and parasite DNA were extracted simultaneously using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol and eluted with 100μl elution buffer. DNA was extracted from muscle tissues of frozen wings from California ducks and from whole blood stored at-80°C from samples originating in Alaska. Amplification and visualization of a fragment of host Cytochrome oxidase I gene, following protocols described by Kerr et al. [14], was completed to verify the competency of the DNA extraction prior to molecular screening for hematozoa DNA. A nested PCR protocol described by Hellgren et al. [7] was used to screen samples for the presence of hematozoa mtDNA Cytochrome b (Cytb) gene. This method uses multiple primer sets to distinguish between Leucocytozoon DNA and that of Haemoproteus/Plasmodium. All samples were tested twice, and visualized on agarose gels using GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, CA) nucleic acid stain.
Positive PCR products were purified using Exo-SapIT (USB Inc., Cleveland, OH) and sequenced using Sanger sequencing techniques. Cycle sequencing was performed with identical primers used for the final PCR along with BigDye Terminator version 3.1 mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed on an Applied Biosystems 3730xl automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Unedited sequences were analyzed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST)[15] to confirm nested PCR results and distinguish infections of Haemoproteus from Plasmodium. Sequences were assembled, edited, and cropped to a maximum length as determined by bi-directional coverage using Sequencher version 4.7 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI). Sequences containing ambiguous bases were removed from subsequent analyses. Resultant sequences were assembled, aligned and cropped to a common length of 386 base pairs (bp) for further analyses. Parasite lineages for which only short bi-directional reads were obtained (i.e. < 386bp of homologous DNA) were omitted from genetic analyses.
Assessing molecular diversity in parasites
Haplotype frequency and distances for all hematozoa sequences were summarized in a median-joining minimum spanning network created using Network version 4.6 (available at www.fluxus-engineering.com). To further explore parasite diversity in sample collections, haplotype diversity (H), and nucleotide diversity (π) values were calculated for sequences originating from Alaska and California were calculated for each parasite genus using Arlequin 3.5.1.2 [16].
Phylogenetic analysis
A single representative of each blood parasite haplotype found in our study (n = 48; GenBank accession numbers: KM386316-KM386363) was included along with 1,076 unique Cytb lineages of, Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon available on the MalAvi public Database as of March-11–2014 [17] for a total analysis of 1,124 parasite haplotypes. Database sequences were selected if they were void of any nucleotide ambiguities within the 386bp region corresponding to our sequences and had complete coverage over this region of the Cytb gene. All avian host orders and the continents of origin were downloaded, abbreviated, and appended to each corresponding lineage name for sequences meeting the above criteria. A Maximum Likelihood tree with 1,000 bootstrap replicates was calculated in MEGA version 6.06 [18] using a Tamura-Nei model to assess the relatedness of blood parasites from waterfowl relative to those identified in other taxa for each of the three genera (Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon).
Results
Hematozoa detection, identification of haplotypes, and molecular diversity
In total, 1,654 positive blood parasite infections were identified from 2,207 samples tested (Table 1). After removing sequences with ambiguities and those shorter than 386bp, 1,029 sequences were used for subsequent analyses. Of these, 684 blood parasite sequences originated from ducks sampled in Alaska and 345 sequences were derived from ducks in California (Table 1). Totals of 316, 200, and 513 sequences were identified as Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon respectively (Table 1). The large number of samples apparently coinfected with more than one genetic lineage of Leucocytozoon was the primary reason for the reduction in number of parasite sequences used in analyses of genetic diversity and host range (data not shown).
Table 1. Summary of field samples collected by location and species, the number of confirmed positive infections (+), the percentage of samples identified as positive (in parentheses), and the corresponding number of sequences used (n) in diversity and phylogenetic analyses (i.e. sequences used = the number of sequences with bi-directional coverage of 386 base pairs and no ambiguous bases) are indicated.
Species | Field samples collected | Haemoproteus | Plasmodium | Leucocytozoon | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+ | n | + | n | + | N | ||
Alaska | 1,347 | 282 (21%) | 240 | 179 (13%) | 168 | 588 (44%) | 276 |
Lesser Scaup | 60 | 16 (27%) | 13 | 3 (5%) | 3 | 33 (55%) | 23 |
Mallard | 481 | 112 (23%) | 94 | 40 (8%) | 38 | 173 (36%) | 85 |
Northern Pintail | 490 | 83 (17%) | 73 | 114 (23%) | 108 | 224 (46%) | 117 |
American Green-winged Teal | 228 | 30 (13%) | 25 | 16 (7%) | 14 | 84 (37%) | 35 |
American Wigeon | 88 | 41 (47%) | 35 | 6 (7%) | 5 | 74 (84%) | 16 |
California | 860 | 88 (10%) | 76 | 34 (4%) | 32 | 483 (56%) | 237 |
Mallard | 200 | 11 (6%) | 10 | 8 (4%) | 7 | 26 (13%) | 12 |
Northern Pintail | 60 | 2 (3%) | 2 | 1 (2%) | 1 | 35 (58%) | 18 |
Northern Shoveler | 200 | 14 (7%) | 13 | 11 (6%) | 10 | 118 (59%) | 59 |
American Green-winged Teal | 200 | 39 (20%) | 34 | 5 (3%) | 5 | 152 (76%) | 75 |
American Wigeon | 200 | 22 (11%) | 17 | 9 (5%) | 9 | 152 (76%) | 73 |
Total | 2,207 | 370 (17%) | 316 | 213 (10%) | 200 | 1,071 (49%) | 513 |
A total of 48 unique hematozoa haplotypes, “DUCK01–DUCK48,” were identified in our samples: eight Haemoproteus, seven Plasmodium, and 33 Leucocytozoon. The two most common Haemoproteus haplotypes (DUCK01 = 81% and DUCK02 = 17% of sequences) were detected in samples of all six duck species sampled, whereas the six remaining haplotypes were identified in only a single sample each (Table 2). Similarly, the two most common Plasmodium haplotypes (DUCK09 = 72% and DUCK10 = 26% of sequences) were detected in six and five species of ducks, respectively, in contrast to the other five haplotypes, each being detected in a single sample (Table 2). Eighty-nine percent of the Leucocytozoon sequences were distributed across the seven most common haplotypes with the two most common haplotypes representing the majority of Leucocytozoon infections (41% in DUCK19 and 15% in DUCK18). Fourteen of 33 Leucocytozoon haplotypes were detected in more than one species of duck (Table 2).
Table 2. Summary of haplotypes identified in this study, the corresponding frequency at which they were identified, and host species within which they originated (L = Lesser Scaup, M = Mallard, N = Northern Pintail, S = Northern Shoveler, T = American Green-winged Teal, W = American Wigeon).
Detection in Pacific Americas Flyway Ducks | BLAST results | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haplotype | Accession | Frequency total | Species of origin | Accession | Identity | MalAvi lineage | Avian host/vector | |
Haemoproteus | DUCK01 | KM386316 | 255 | LMPSTW | JQ314226 | 100 | TUSW07 | Cygnus columbianas |
DUCK02 | KM386317 | 55 | LMPSTW | JQ314225 | 100 | TUSW06 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK03 | KM386318 | 1 | P | JQ314226 | 99 | TUSW07 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK04 | KM386319 | 1 | M | JQ314226 | 99 | TUSW07 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK05 | KM386320 | 1 | M | JQ314226 | 99 | TUSW07 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK06 | KM386321 | 1 | L | JQ314225 | 99 | TUSW06 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK07 | KM386322 | 1 | P | JQ314225 | 99 | TUSW06 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK08 | KM386323 | 1 | M | JQ314226 | 99 | TUSW07 | Cygnus columbianas | |
Plasmodium | DUCK09 | KM386357 | 144 | LMPSTW | HF543643 | 100 | BT7 | Milvus sp |
DUCK10 | KM386358 | 51 | MPSTW | AB741489 | 100 | Mallard partial | Anas platyrhynchos | |
DUCK11 | KM386359 | 1 | P | DQ368392 | 100 | SYBOR2 | Sylvia borin | |
DUCK12 | KM386360 | 1 | L | KC867673 | 100 | BOBOVT | Dolichonyx oryzivorus | |
DUCK13 | KM386361 | 1 | L | KC867677 | 100 | BOBO | Dolichonyx oryzivorus | |
DUCK14 | KM386362 | 1 | T | AB741489 | 99 | Anas platyrhynchos 4 | Anas platyrhynchos | |
DUCK15 | KM386363 | 1 | W | HF543643 | 99 | ENV | Milvus sp | |
Leucocytozoon | DUCK16 | KM386324 | 38 | MPSTW | JQ314224 | 100 | TUSW05 | Cygnus columbianas |
DUCK17 | KM386325 | 3 | MS | JQ314224 | 99 | TUSW05 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK18 | KM386326 | 78 | MPTW | KC409122 | 100 | NOPI04 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK19 | KM386327 | 208 | LMPSTW | JQ314223 | 100 | TUSW04 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK20 | KM386328 | 3 | M | KC409123 | 99 | NOPI05 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK21 | KM386329 | 69 | MPTW | AB743872 | 100 | Anas crecca | Anas crecca | |
DUCK22 | KM386330 | 8 | MPTW | AB743872 | 99 | Anas crecca | Anas crecca | |
DUCK23 | KM386331 | 17 | MPT | AB741516 | 99 | Cygnus cygnus | Cygnus cygnus | |
DUCK24 | KM386332 | 36 | MP | KC409123 | 100 | NOPI05 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK25 | KM386333 | 12 | LS | HF543635 | 96 | MILVUS02 | Milvus sp | |
DUCK26 | KM386334 | 2 | P | KC409122 | 99 | NOPI04 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK27 | KM386335 | 1 | P | KC409122 | 99 | NOPI04 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK28 | KM386336 | 1 | P | JQ314223 | 99 | TUSW04 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK29 | KM386337 | 1 | M | EF032867 | 99 | IHELLI1 | Black fly, vector | |
DUCK30 | KM386338 | 1 | L | EF032867 | 100 | IHELLI1 | Black fly, vector | |
DUCK31 | KM386339 | 1 | L | JQ314223 | 99 | TUSW04 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK32 | KM386340 | 1 | P | AB743872 | 99 | Anas crecca | Anas crecca | |
DUCK33 | KM386341 | 1 | L | HF543635 | 96 | MILVUS02 | Milvus sp | |
DUCK34 | KM386342 | 1 | T | AB743872 | 99 | Anas crecca | Anas crecca | |
DUCK35 | KM386343 | 1 | M | KC409123 | 99 | NOPI05 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK36 | KM386344 | 2 | PW | JQ314223 | 99 | TUSW04 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK37 | KM386345 | 6 | MPTW | KC409119 | 100 | NOPI01 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK38 | KM386346 | 1 | P | AB743872 | 99 | Anas crecca | Anas crecca | |
DUCK39 | KM386347 | 2 | T | AB743872 | 99 | Anas crecca | Anas crecca | |
DUCK40 | KM386348 | 7 | TW | KC409127 | 100 | NOPI09 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK41 | KM386349 | 4 | TW | KC409126 | 100 | NOPI08 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK42 | KM386350 | 2 | W | KC409119 | 99 | NOPI01 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK43 | KM386351 | 1 | S | KC409119 | 99 | NOPI01 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK44 | KM386352 | 1 | P | JQ314223 | 99 | TUSW04 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK45 | KM386353 | 1 | T | JQ314223 | 99 | TUSW04 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK46 | KM386354 | 1 | T | JQ314223 | 99 | TUSW04 | Cygnus columbianas | |
DUCK47 | KM386355 | 1 | W | KC409119 | 99 | NOPI01 | Anas acuta | |
DUCK48 | KM386356 | 1 | W | AB741516 | 99 | Cygnus cygnus 4 | Cygnus cygnus |
The highest scoring NCBI BLAST results are given right of vertical dotted line for each haplotype along with the corresponding accession number, identity and the MalAvi lineage. The sequence name in italics corresponding to the accession number is provided if no MalAvi lineage was identified in conjunction with the highest scoring BLAST result. The origin (avian host or arthropod vector) of the most closely related parasite cytochrome b sequence as inferred by the highest scoring maximum identity score is provided in the far-right column.
All eight Haemoproteus haplotypes were identified in blood samples collected from ducks in Alaska; in contrast only the two most common haplotypes were detected in tissues originating from waterfowl sampled in California (Fig. 1). Five of eight Plasmodium haplotypes were detected in Alaska samples as compared to four haplotypes detected in California. All Plasmodium haplotypes detected in more than one sample were found in both locations (Fig. 1). Of the 33 Leucocytozoon haplotypes identified in our samples, 23 were detected in Alaska and 17 in California (Fig. 1). Seven Leucocytozoon haplotypes were detected at both locations in contrast to 26 haplotypes that were unique to parasites in ducks sampled at only one location; these included some of the more common haplotypes (e.g. DUCK21 = 13% and DUCK24 = 7% of sequences) that were only detected in Alaska.
The calculated H and π for parasites from the six duck species sampled was lowest in Haemoproteus and highest in Leucocytozoon (Table 3). Differences in H, but not for π, were observed for parasites identified in sample collections from Alaska and California for all genera of blood parasites (Table 3).
Table 3. Haplotype and nucleotide diversity values (H and π respectively) and their 95% confidence intervals for all haplotypes belonging to each genus of haemosporidian identified in this study.
H | π | |
---|---|---|
Haemoproteus | 0.320 +/- 0.029 | 0.003 +/- 0.002 |
Plasmodium | 0.419 +/- 0.032 | 0.010 +/- 0.006 |
Leucocytozoon | 0.783 +/-0.014 | 0.045 +/- 0.022 |
All calculations performed in Arlequin 3.5.1.2 [16].
Phylogenetic relatedness of parasites from different avian host species
The 1,124 sequences in the ML tree clustered by genera as expected (Fig. 2, S1 Fig.). Large clades generally had poor bootstrap support. However, terminal clades containing sequences originating from waterfowl had higher support (>50) with few exceptions.
Haemoproteus
All Haemoproteus haplotypes from sequences originating in ducks from Alaska and California were closely related and nested within a single clade in the ML tree (Figs. 2 and 3). Four lineages, of Anseriformes origin, identified from the MalAvi database were also embedded in this clade, and three of those four lineages were identical to sequences from Alaska and California. Two Haemoproteus haplotypes identified from waterfowl samples as reported on the MalAvi database were phylogenetically divergent from this clade: DENJAV01 (Fig. 3) and WW1 (S1 Fig.). DENJAV01 and WW1 were related to lineages infecting Coraciiformes and Passeriformes in Eurasia respectively.
Plasmodium
Five of the seven Plasmodium haplotypes identified in Alaska and California ducks were embedded in a clade comprised of haplotypes originating in Anseriformes and four additional orders of birds (Charadriiformes, Falconiformes, Passeriformes, and Strigiformes; Figs. 2 and 4A). The remaining two Plasmodium haplotypes (DUCK12–13) identified in our data originated from Lesser Scaup samples collected in Alaska, and were found in two distantly related clades comprised of three and ten MalAvi lineages respectively (Figs. 2 and 4B-C). The sequences in these clades, including identical lineages to DUCK12 and DUCK13, originated from parasites detected in Passeriformes and Strigiformes.
Leucocytozoon
All 33 Leucocytozoon haplotypes originating from ducks in Alaska and California clustered in a single clade within the ML tree (Fig. 2). These Leucocytozoon haplotypes formed 5 well supported clades (“A”–“E” in Fig. 5; bootstrap > 91), each separated by distances of 4.9%–7.6% via post-hoc calculation of pairwise differences (Table 4) performed in Arlequin 3.5.1.2 [16]. Six lineages originating in Anseriformes were identified from the MalAvi database, all of which were embedded in either clade B or D (Fig. 5). Clades D and E can be described, via the topology of the ML tree, as having closer shared ancestry with a clade comprised of parasite lineages originating from non-waterfowl avian orders (i.e. MILVUS02, BGR3, GRUS1, GORGOI01, GORGOI02) than with clades A–C; however, support for this inferred relationship was weak (bootstrap = 5; S1 Fig.).
Table 4. Genetic distances between clades of Leucocytozoon haplotypes sequenced in this study.
Leuc A | Leuc B | Leuc C | Leuc D | Leuc E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leuc A | 0.004 +/- 0.003 | ||||
Leuc B | 0.050* | 0.004 +/- 0.003 | |||
Leuc C | 0.065* | 0.058* | 0.003 +/- 0.002 | ||
Leuc D | 0.062* | 0.070* | 0.068* | 0.004 +/- 0.003 | |
Leuc E | 0.076* | 0.074* | 0.073* | 0.049* | 0.006 +/- 0.004 |
Average number of pairwise differences between individuals within populations (PiX)/386bp are given as nucleotide diversity index on the diagonal in bold. Average numbers of pairwise differences between populations (PiXY)/386bp are given below diagonal. Asterisks indicate values with highly significant P-values (<0.001). All calculations performed in Arlequin 3.5.1.2 [16].
Discussion
Genetic diversity
It is generally accepted that L. simondi is the only species of Leucocytozoon infecting waterfowl [1]. Interestingly, the genetic diversity of Leucocytozoon parasites sampled from waterfowl in this study was higher than that found in either Haemoproteus or Plasmodium. Assuming all sequences produced in this study are from L. simondi, the genetic distances observed (up to 7.6%) among the five clades are relatively large for a single taxon. By comparison the average genetic distance between Cytb sequences from all recognized avian Haemoproteus species in the MalAvi database is 7.0% [19] and the average genetic distance between haplotypes of different genera (Haemoproteus and Plasmodium) derived from Alaska and California ducks was 8.9% (data not shown). It is likely that multiple species of Leucocytozoon are represented here, or perhaps cryptic species are present but not yet identified through morphological examination of infected erythrocytes. A thorough study combining traditional morphometric taxonomy with genetic analyses would be useful to assess the possibility of cryptic speciation. This type of study has been conducted before to distinguish species previously thought to comprise a single morphospecies (i.e. genetic clades of L. toddi with 10.9% divergence infecting different taxa of diurnal raptors; [20]).
Compared to Leucocytozoon, a lower level of genetic diversity was observed among Haemoproteus sequences originating in Alaska and California waterfowl. Two species of Haemoproteus parasites (H. nettions and H. greineri) have previously been reported to infect North American waterfowl, however, the possibility that these species may be synonymous has also been proposed [1]. The low genetic diversity of Haemoproteus parasites observed in Alaska and California waterfowl supports a single species hypothesis, although a detailed study pairing morphological analysis of parasites with genetic data is necessary to properly investigate this postulate. We cannot ascertain as to whether both morphospecies are represented within the samples tested in the current study despite a large sample size from two geographically distant areas.
Similar to Haemoproteus parasites, a relatively low genetic diversity was also observed for Plasmodium, despite previous reports of up to six species of parasites of this genera infecting North American waterfowl [1]. Several factors may at least partially explain this result. Unlike Leucocytozoon parasites which are readily detected in avian muscle tissue [9], the nested PCR used in this study may not be as sensitive for Plasmodium parasites; which may account for the detection of relatively few parasites of this genus in California. Prevalence may also be lower for Plasmodium parasites in waterfowl in the Pacific Flyway as compared to the other haemosporidian genera investigated. The detection of multiple divergent Plasmodium haplotypes, however, is consistent with infection of waterfowl in Alaska and California with multiple Plasmodium species.
Haplotypes frequently detected in parasites from both Alaska blood and California wing samples (e.g. Haemoproteus DUCK01 and DUCK02; Fig. 1), may indicate these lineages are widespread across western North America and may be redistributed along the Pacific Americas Flyway in migratory birds. On the other hand, unique haplotypes identified in multiple samples at only one location (e.g. DUCK21 and DUCK40; Fig. 1), may indicate differences among sample collections. Disproportional sharing of some of the more frequently observed Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon haplotypes provide further evidence for differences among sample collections. For example, the majority of Plasmodium sequences from Alaska samples (81%) were identified as haplotype DUCK09; while 69% of sequences originating from California samples were DUCK10 (Fig. 1). Leucocytozoon sequences for parasites originating in California were predominate in clades A, B, and C while clades D and E were comprised almost exclusively of parasite lineages detected in Alaska (Fig. 1). Possible explanations for these observed differences are numerous. Although all six species of ducks in this study have some degree of migratory connectivity between Alaska and California, the Central Valley wintering grounds of California receive a larger total number of annual migrants (e.g. Northern Pintails, American Green-winged Teal and American Wigeon) from prairie pothole breeding grounds in north-central North America than from Alaska [21]. Therefore, assemblages of hosts in California from multiple breeding locations may contribute to differences in genetic diversity of parasites detected in the two sampling locations. Furthermore, Lesser Scaup and Northern Shoveler were not sampled at both locations, and sample collections from Alaska and California were obtained in different seasons, years, and from dissimilar tissue types. Thus confounding precludes robust inference on whether genetic differences observed between sample collections for Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon parasites are a function of space, time, detection biases, host species or a combination thereof.
Host specificity
Although the detection of the two most common Haemoproteus haplotypes in all six species of ducks sampled as part of this study suggests parasite sharing among waterfowl species, the clustering of all eight Haemoproteus haplotypes detected in samples collected from Alaska and California within a monophyletic clade along with four waterfowl-origin lineages obtained from the MalAvi database suggests a relatively narrow host range (Anseriformes) for these closely related parasites. The reporting of two additional phylogenetically divergent Haemoproteus lineages as infecting waterfowl on the MalAvi database, DENJAV01 and WW1, closely related to lineages infecting Coraciiformes and Passerines, respectively, suggests that these parasite lineages may be the result of spillover from non-waterfowl hosts. Collectively, these findings are consistent with previous studies suggesting that Haemoproteus species are more likely to be specialized to hosts than Plasmodium [4,11,22]; however, they also provide evidence for infrequent host switching for Haemoproteus parasites.
Plasmodium haplotypes detected in more than one individual in Alaska or California were also detected in at least five species of ducks, suggesting parasite sharing among waterfowl. However, Plasmodium also showed considerably more evidence for host switching compared to other genera. The clustering of five Plasmodium haplotypes detected in Alaska and California ducks in a clade with 18 additional lineages identified in Passeriformes, Charadriiformes, Falconiformes, and Strigiformes provides evidence for repeated cross species transmission of parasites in the presence of suitable vectors. Similarly, the shared identity and close phylogenetic relationship of two divergent Plasmodium haplotypes identified in our study, with lineages originating from Passeriformes and Strigiformes, provides further evidence for relatively frequent host switching for parasites of this genus. A generalist strategy of parasitism for Plasmodium in wild birds is also supported by previous molecular studies [11,22].
In contrast to Plasmodium, the exclusive relationship between waterfowl and Leucocytozoon Cytb lineages supports a relatively high degree of host specificity for parasites of this genus with respect to Anseriformes birds. Inferred shared ancestry of Clades D-E with parasite lineages detected in non-waterfowl orders may indicate previous host switching events; however the limited support for this relationship may also suggest that the phylogenetic analysis failed to identify the true ancestral relationship. Thus whether or not all Leucocytozoon lineages detected in waterfowl have common, monophyletic ancestry and evolved with Anseriformes hosts remains uncertain. Such a scenario would be supported by experimental studies that provide evidence for host specificity of L. simondi to waterfowl [23,24].
Conclusions and future work
This study provides evidence that genetic diversity and host specificity vary for three genera of haemosporidian parasites in ducks of the Pacific Americas Flyway. Based on these results we identified three topics of future research direction. First, the relatively high genetic diversity of Leucocytozoon parasites, and low diversity of Haemoproteus parasites occurring in waterfowl highlights the need for future research that combines microscopy and molecular techniques to reassess taxonomic speciation within these genera. Such an assessment would improve inference of future investigations aiming to examine parasite evolution and pathogenic effects on hosts. Second, the frequency of coinfections in our samples, particularly the number of ducks with multiple variants of Leucocytozoon, suggests that intra-host parasite interactions may play a role in infection dynamics in waterfowl as has been shown for other avian taxa [25]. Future investigations examining parasite competition and effects of coinfections on host species may be helpful for understanding observed differences in parasite diversity and factors contributing to pathogenicity. Third, the observed differences in haplotype frequencies between sample collections from Alaska and California warrant further investigation of temporal, regional, and tissue-specific differences in parasite distributions. Controlling the number of variables between the two locations (i.e. species, time, and tissue type) will increase the resolution of results and facilitate a better understanding of how birds may redistribute parasites through migration.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to many biologists and volunteers for their assistance with duck captures. We appreciate reviews provided by J. Pearce, C. Atkinson, and two anonymous reviewers. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Data Availability
All sequence data are available from GenBank using accession numbers KM386316-KM386363.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the USGS through the Wildlife Program of the Ecosystem Mission Area, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the Central Valley Joint Venture and Avian Health and Disease Program and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife via a contract with California Waterfowl Association. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Valkiunas G (2005) Avian Malaria Parasites and other Haemosporidia Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press. 935 p. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Herman CM, Barrow JH Jr, Tarshis IB (1975) Leucocytozoonosis in Canada geese at the Seney National Wildlife Refuge. J Wildl Dis 11: 404–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Van Riper C III, Van Riper SG, Goff ML, Laird M (1986) The epizootiology and ecological significance of malaria in Hawaiian land birds. Ecol Monogr 56: 327–344. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Atkinson CT, Van Ripper C III (1991) Pathogenicity and epizootiology of avian haematozoa: Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon, and Haemoproteus In: Loye JE, Zuk M, editors. Bird-Parasite Interactions. England: Oxford University Press; pp. 19–48. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bennett GF, Peirce MA, Ashford RW (1993) Avian Hematozoa—Mortality and Pathogenicity. J Nat Hist 27: 993–1001. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Matta NE, Pacheco MA, Escalante AA, Valkiunas G, Ayerbe-Quinones F, et al. (2014) Description and molecular characterization of Haemoproteus macrovacuolatus n. sp. (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae), a morphologically unique blood parasite of black-bellied whistling duck (Dendrocygna autumnalis) from South America. Parasitol Res 113: 2991–3000. 10.1007/s00436-014-3961-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hellgren O, Waldenstrom J, Bensch S (2004) A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J Parasitol 90: 797–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ramey AM, Ely CR, Schmutz JA, Pearce JM, Heard DJ (2012) Molecular Detection of Hematozoa Infections in Tundra Swans Relative to Migration Patterns and Ecological Conditions at Breeding Grounds. Plos One 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ramey AM, Fleskes JP, Schmutz JA, Yabsley MJ (2013) Evaluation of blood and muscle tissues for molecular detection and characterization of hematozoa infections in northern pintails (Anas acuta) wintering in California. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2: 102–109. 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ramey AM, Reed JA, Schmutz JA, Fondell TF, Meixell BW, et al. (2014) Prevalence, transmission, and genetic diversity of blood parasites infecting tundra-nesting geese in Alaska. Can J Zool 92: 699–706. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cumming GS, Shepard E, Okanga S, Caron A, Ndlovu M, et al. (2013) Host associations, biogeography, and phylogenetics of avian malaria in southern African waterfowl. Parasitology 140: 193–201. 10.1017/S0031182012001461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wood MJ, Childs DZ, Davies AS, Hellgren O, Cornwallis CK, et al. (2013) The epidemiology underlying age-related avian malaria infection in a long-lived host: the mute swan Cygnus olor. J Avian Biol 44: 347–358. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yoshimura A, Koketsu M, Bando H, Saiki E, Suzuki M, et al. (2014) Phylogenetic comparison of avian haemosporidian parasites from resident and migratory birds in northern Japan. J Wildl Dis 50: 235–242. 10.7589/2013-03-071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kerr KCR, Stoeckle MY, Dove CJ, Weigt LA, Francis CM, et al. (2007) Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 535–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1: 47–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bensch S, Hellgren O, Perez-Tris J (2009) MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour 9: 1353–1358. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02692.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596–1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Outlaw DC, Ricklefs RE (2014) Species limits in avian malaria parasites (Haemosporida): how to move forward in the molecular era. Parasitology 141: 1223–1232. 10.1017/S0031182014000560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sehgal RNM, Hull AC, Anderson NL, Valkiunas G, Markovets MJ, et al. (2006) Evidence for cryptic speciation of Leucocytozoon spp. (Haemosporida, Leucocytozoidae) in diurnal raptors. J Parasitol 92: 375–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bellrose FC (1976) Ducks, Geese & Swans of North America Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA: Stackpole Books. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Beadell JS, Gering E, Austin J, Dumbacher JP, Peirce MA, et al. (2004) Prevalence and differential host-specificity of two avian blood parasite genera in the Australo-Papuan region. Mol Ecol 13: 3829–3844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Anderson JR, Trainer DO, Defoliart GR (1962) Natural and experimental transmission of the waterfowl parasite, Leucocytozoon simondi M. & L, in Wisconsin. Zoonoses Res 1: 155–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Fallis AM, Pearson JC, Bennett GF (1954) On the specificity of Leucocytozoon. Can J Zool 32: 120–124. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Oakgrove KS, Harrigan RJ, Loiseau C, Guers S, Seppi B, et al. (2014) Distribution, diversity and drivers of blood-borne parasite co-infections in Alaskan bird populations. International Journal for Parasitology 44: 717–727. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All sequence data are available from GenBank using accession numbers KM386316-KM386363.