Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1974 Dec;71(12):4847–4849. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.12.4847

Gene Frequency Comparisons Between Taxa: Support for the Natural Selection of Protein Polymorphisms

Francisco J Ayala *, Michael E Gilpin †
PMCID: PMC433995  PMID: 4531023

Abstract

The hypothesis has been advanced that the pervasive protein variation found in natural populations of many organisms is adaptively neutral, and thus not subject to natural selection. This neutrality hypothesis predicts that at polymorphic gene loci different configurations of allelic frequencies will occur in different species. Results of an extensive study of protein variation in several species of Drosophila show that any two species have very similar allelic frequencies at a substantial proportion of all gene loci, while at many other loci the species have very different sets of alleles. Genetic distances have been calculated between pairs of subspecies, morphologically similar species, and morphologically different species. The distribution of genetic distances is strikingly different from the predictions of the neutrality theory. Protein variation appears to be maintained by natural selection.

Keywords: evolution, population genetics, Drosophila, speciation, enzyme variation

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Dobzhansky T. Polymorphisms in continental and island populations of Drosophila willistoni. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Oct;68(10):2480–2483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.10.2480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Tracey M. L. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila Willistoni group. V. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila equinoxialis. Genet Res. 1972 Aug;20(1):19–42. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300013562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Tracey M. L., Mourão C. A., Pérez-Salas S. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics. 1972 Jan;70(1):113–139. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayala F. J., Tracey M. L., Barr L. G., McDonald J. F., Pérez-Salas S. Genetic variation in natural populations of five Drosophila species and the hypothesis of the selective neutrality of protein polymorphisms. Genetics. 1974 Jun;77(2):343–384. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayala F. J., Tracey M. L. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. 8. Genetic differentiation and reproduction isolation between tow subspecies. J Hered. 1973 May-Jun;64(3):120–124. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ayala F. J., Tracey M. L. Genetic differentiation within and between species of the Drosophila willistoni group. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Mar;71(3):999–1003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.3.999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harris H. Enzyme polymorphisms in man. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Mar 22;164(995):298–310. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M., Ohta T. Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature. 1971 Feb 12;229(5285):467–469. doi: 10.1038/229467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. King J. L., Jukes T. H. Non-Darwinian evolution. Science. 1969 May 16;164(3881):788–798. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3881.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lakovaara S., Saura A. Genetic variation in natural populations of Drosophila obscura. Genetics. 1971 Nov;69(3):377–384. doi: 10.1093/genetics/69.3.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Richmond R. C. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. 3. Amounts of variability in the superspecies, D. paulistorum. Genetics. 1972 Jan;70(1):87–112. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.1.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Selander R. K., Kaufman D. W. Genic variability and strategies of adaptation in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Jun;70(6):1875–1877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.6.1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES