Background: Eukaryotic ThrRSs exhibit four structural domains similar to bacterial ThrRSs and evolve a eukaryote-specific N-terminal extension domain.
Results: Essential roles of 12 crucial residues in aminoacylation and editing reactions were revealed.
Conclusion: The identified critical residues affected activities of ThrRS in various manners.
Significance: We elucidated the synthetic and editing functions of selected residues and confirmed the functional consistency between yeast and human ThrRSs.
Keywords: Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase; Mutagenesis; Protein Structure; Transfer RNA (tRNA); Translation; Aminoacylation, Editing
Abstract
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are a group of ancient enzymes catalyzing aminoacylation and editing reactions for protein biosynthesis. Increasing evidence suggests that these critical enzymes are often associated with mammalian disorders. Therefore, complete determination of the enzymes functions is essential for informed diagnosis and treatment. Here, we show that a yeast knock-out strain for the threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) gene is an excellent platform for such an investigation. Saccharomyces cerevisiae ThrRS has a unique modular structure containing four structural domains and a eukaryote-specific N-terminal extension. Using randomly mutated libraries of the ThrRS gene (thrS) and a genetic screen, a set of loss-of-function mutants were identified. The mutations affected the synthetic and editing activities and influenced the dimer interface. The results also highlighted the role of the N-terminal extension for enzymatic activity and protein stability. To gain insights into the pathological mechanisms induced by mutated aaRSs, we systematically introduced the loss-of-function mutations into the human cytoplasmic ThrRS gene. All mutations induced similar detrimental effects, showing that the yeast model could be used to study pathology-associated point mutations in mammalian aaRSs.
Introduction
During protein biosynthesis, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs)3 must attach the correct amino acid to the corresponding tRNA molecule (1). This process supplies the ribosome with the aminoacyl-tRNAs that are essential for protein synthesis in all cells. The aaRSs are critical in ribosomal protein translation because each canonical aaRS accurately pairs its correct amino acid to the cognate tRNA isoacceptor(s). The attachment of amino acids to tRNAs by aaRSs is performed in two steps. The amino acid is first activated with ATP to form an activated aminoacyl adenylate and then transesterified to the 3′-end of the tRNA (1). Generally, there are 20 different aaRSs in living organisms, and these enzymes can be divided into two classes (I and II) of 10 members each. The active site of class I aaRSs is based on a Rossmann fold containing two consensus sequences, HIGH and KMSKS (2), whereas that of class II aaRSs contains an antiparallel β-fold catalytic center with three motifs: motifs 1, 2, and 3 (3, 4).
Accurate aminoacylation of tRNA with its cognate amino acids by aaRSs is essential for quality control of protein synthesis, because a mischarged non-cognate amino acid may be incorporated into the nascent peptide chain after aminoacylation (1). Challenged by a large pool of proteinaceous amino acids and amino acid analogs, some aaRSs cannot discriminate accurately between cognate and non-cognate amino acids. For example, Ile is structurally similar to Leu, differing only by a branched methyl group, and can be activated by leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS, one specific aaRS is abbreviated as its three-letter amino acid code and “RS”) (5). To maintain translational fidelity, several aaRSs evolved proofreading (editing) mechanisms to hydrolyze either misactivated amino acids or misacylated tRNAs, which are termed pretransfer editing or post-transfer editing, respectively (6, 7). Editing activities catalyzed by aaRSs are essential for organisms to sustain normal metabolism. Editing dysfunction causes growth defects in bacteria (8) and mitochondrial abnormality in yeast (9). In the last decade, more and more disease-causing mutations have been found in the aaRS-coding genes. For example, a collection of mutations located at the aminoacylation domain of both GlyRS and TyrRS leads to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (10–12). A mutation located in the editing domain of AlaRS causes cerebellar ataxia (13).
Together with SerRS, AlaRS, GlyRS, ProRS, and HisRS, ThrRS belongs to the class IIa aaRSs and is a dimer (14, 15). Escherichia coli ThrRS (EcThrRS) forms the dimeric core comprising the synthetic catalytic and C-terminal tRNA anticodon binding domain. Two extra domains on the N-terminal side of each monomer protrude outside the core, forming the editing domains of the dimer, which also provide a binding interface to the minor groove of the tRNA acceptor stem (14). In contrast to other synthetases, ThrRS only activates a small number of non-cognate amino acids, such as β-hydroxynorvaline and Ser (16). A zinc ion found in the synthetic active site is implicated in Thr recognition and discrimination against non-cognate amino acids. The zinc atom imposes a strict structural geometry and controls the interacting distance with the amino acid substrate. With Thr, the side chain hydroxyl is at the ideal distance of 2.38 Å from the zinc atom. In the case of the isosteric amino acid Val, an obvious clash with one of its methyl groups would create steric hindrance alone and prevent its activation. In this way, ThrRS efficiently discriminates against amino acids possessing methyl groups but discriminates less well against amino acids with a hydroxyl group, such as Ser (17). Hydrolysis of the erroneously aminoacylated Ser occurs in the distant N2 editing domain by a mechanism of post-transfer editing ensuring faithful aminoacylation. In the editing site, two His residues (His73 and His77) are responsible for hydrolyzing the misacylated Ser-tRNAThr (17). In contrast, most archaeal ThrRSs possess a unique N-terminal editing domain unrelated to the bacterial N2 domain (18, 19) but homologous to the d-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase that removes d-amino acids from mischarged tRNAs. Moreover, several crenarchaeal species contain two genes to encode either the catalytic (ThrRS-cat) or editing (ThrRS-ed) enzymes. ThrRS-cat performs aminoacylation, and ThrRS-ed contains an editing domain to hydrolyze mischarged Ser-tRNAThr in trans (19, 20).
Theoretically, the molecular mass of a subunit in the dimeric ThrRS from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ScThrRS) is 84.5 kDa, comprising 734 amino acid residues. In terms of primary sequence, eukaryotic ThrRSs, such as ScThrRS and Homo sapiens cytoplasmic ThrRS (HsThrRS), resemble their bacterial counterparts. However, detailed analysis revealed several different characteristics between them. First, despite retaining crucial editing amino acid residues (such as His151 and His155 in ScThrRS, counterparts of His73 and His77 of EcThrRS) in eukaryotic ThrRSs, the periphery elements in both the N1 and N2 domains of eukaryotic ThrRSs display significant differences from their bacterial counterparts. Second, the most striking difference is the fusion of a unique eukaryotic ThrRSs-specific N-terminal extension (N-extension) whose relevance in aminoacylation, editing, or protein structure is not completely understood (Fig. 1, A and B). A previous study found that a partial deletion mutant at the N-extension of ScThrRS (ScThrRS-Δ40) affected catalytic parameters; however, the possibility of a major structural effect could not be ruled out (21). Furthermore, some conserved residues exist in the N-extension-containing ThrRSs, highlighting their potential role in protein function and/or structure. For example, an arginine residue (Arg52 in ScThrRS) is absolutely conserved in the N-extension of eukaryotic ThrRSs (Fig. 1B), suggesting its potentially critical role for eukaryotic N-extension/ThrRSs. Therefore, further detailed investigation of the effect of conserved Arg52 on the enzymatic properties using various in vivo and in vitro methods is required.
FIGURE 1.
Domain and sequence analysis of the selected residues of ScThrRS. A, schematic representation of the domain composition of ScThrRS, based on the structural modules of EcThrRS. 12 selected ScThrRS mutations were found in four domains of ScThrRS. Eight mutated residues were conserved in ScThrRS and HsThrRS, which are shown with dotted lines. B, sequence alignment of N-terminal peptidic extensions of various eukaryotic ThrRSs, showing the strict conservation of an arginine residue (highlighted by a box) at position 52 in ScThrRS. C, multiple sequence analysis of several peptides containing the selected residues, which are highlighted by arrows; other parts of various ThrRSs are omitted for clarity. Ca, Candida albicans; Ce, Caenorhabditis elegans; Cf, Canis familiaris; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Dr, Danio rerio; Gl, Giardia lamblia; Hs, Homo sapiens; Lb, Leishmania braziliensis; Lm, Leishmania major; Mm, Mus musculus; Sc, S. cerevisiae; Tb, Trypanosoma brucei; T. co, Trypanosoma congolense; T. cr, Trypanosoma cruzi; Tv, Trypanosoma vivax.
Although the active site of bacterial ThrRS has been studied extensively by structural and functional approaches (14, 22, 23), little research has been done on eukaryotic ThrRSs. Here, we aimed to identify the functional features of ScThrRS using a genetic tool that is useful for capturing important residues in the dynamic process of aminoacylation and editing (24). Instead of a rational targeting of residues on the protein, we constructed two randomly mutated ScThrRS libraries, a yeast thrS random mutagenesis library (thrS library) and an Arg52-specific mutagenesis library (Arg52 library), to identify important amino acid residues for enzymatic activities and to characterize the function of Arg52 in the N-extension domain, respectively. The two libraries were transformed into a yeast thrS knock-out strain. By plasmid shuffling, we isolated and identified 12 lethal or growth-deficient mutants of ScThrRS. The selection procedure could map the critical residues and enzyme functions efficiently, because the 12 mutants were found in the four modules of ScThrRS, including the N-extension, N2, aminoacylation, and anticodon binding domains. We present a picture of the functions of several residues in the aminoacylation and editing reactions. The results also show the importance of the dimer interface for enzyme activity. Several mutants whose functional importance cannot be assessed from the structural data are selected, demonstrating the importance of this type of approach in the context of a structure-function relationship study. The essential role of the conserved Arg52 of the N-extension in maintaining protein structure/function is described. Finally, we show that introducing the same mutation into HsThrRS also leads to inactive proteins and exhibits a protein amount similar to that of the corresponding ScThrRS mutant, indicating functional consistency of eukaryotic ThrRSs. This opens perspectives on further studies on the human enzyme and its potential derived mutants that cause various types of human diseases.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
l-Thr, l-Ser, 5′-GMP, GTP, UTP, CTP, ATP, MgCl2, Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), dithiothreitol, isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside, bovine serum albumin (BSA), tetrasodium pyrophosphate, inorganic pyrophosphate, and activated charcoal were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. [3H]Thr was from Biotrend Chemicals (Destin, FL). [14C]Ser and [α-32P]ATP were obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. The gel extraction kit, plasmid extraction kit, and yeast plasmid extraction kit were purchased from TIANGEN Biotech (Beijing, China). The dNTP mixture, KOD-Plus-Neo high fidelity DNA polymerase, and KOD-plus mutagenesis kit were purchased from TOYOBO (Osaka, Japan). 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA), pyrophosphatase, T4 ligase, and restriction endonucleases were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid Superflow was from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). BioSune (Shanghai, China) synthesized the oligonucleotides. The yeast transformation kit was from Clontech. The protease inhibitor mixture was from Roche Applied Science. The mouse anti-His6 tag (M20001), anti-GAPDH (M20028), anti-FLAG (M20008), and anti-c-Myc (M20002) antibodies were purchased from Abmart (Shanghai, China).
Construction of Libraries and Selection of ScThrRS Mutants
The construction of the yeast recipient strain with a disrupted thrS gene (ScΔthrS) (BY4743, thrS−, pRS426-ScThrRS) has been described in our laboratory (21). In this knock-out strain, the G418 resistance gene replaced the chromosomal thrS gene. The wild-type thrS gene was cloned into pRS426 (containing URA3) and p425TEF (containing LEU2) (25) to generate the rescuing plasmid pRS426-ScThrRS (thrS+, Ura+) and the selection plasmid p425TEF-ScThrRS (thrS+, Leu+), respectively. Two libraries based on the selection plasmid were constructed.
The first yeast thrS library was obtained by random mutagenesis of p425TEF-ScThrRS. Random mutagenesis can be achieved by several methods, such as error-prone PCR amplification, the use of E. coli mutator strain, or mutagenic agents (26, 27). We used hydroxylamine hydrochloride treatment of p425TEF- ScThrRS. Hydroxylamine causes C to T and G to A transitions by deamination, with a frequency of less than 0.3% (27). Briefly, p425TEF-ScThrRS (50 μg) was incubated in 2 ml of 0.8 m hydroxylamine hydrochloride, 50 mm sodium phosphate, 1 mm EDTA, pH 7.0, for 48 h at 37 °C. The DNA was then precipitated by ethanol at −20 °C overnight and recovered by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 min. DNA sequencing of 20 thrS genes from this library was employed to confirm the mutagenic efficiency and the quality of this library. Twelve genes were found to have a single mutation in their ORFs; thus, the mutation efficiency of this library was about 60%.
The second Arg52 library was produced by PCR using oligonucleotide-directed site-specific mutagenesis to fully randomize residue Arg52 of ScThrRS. The oligonucleotide for saturating mutagenesis was 5′-NNSATTGAAATGTTTGACAGATT-3′, where N represents an equimolar mixture of the four deoxynucleotides, and S represents an equimolar mixture of G and C (the reading frame of NNS decodes Arg52 in the native enzyme). A conventional reverse primer (5′-TTCCTCGATGAAAGTTGGTT-3′) was used. PCR amplification was performed using p425TEF-ScThrRS as the template, following the protocol of the KOD-plus mutagenesis kit. Theoretically, such an Arg52 library should contain 32 variants (4 × 4 × 2) generating the 19 other amino acids, and the mutation efficiency should be nearly 100% because the p425TEF-ScThrRS template was digested by DpnI according to the KOD-plus mutagenesis kit. Indeed, DNA sequencing of 10 thrS genes from the Arg52 library confirmed the mutagenesis efficiency; nine genes were found to contain a single mutation at position 52, suggesting that mutagenic efficiency was around 90%.
The thrS and Arg52 libraries were introduced separately into the yeast strain ScΔthrS, according to the Clontech yeast transformation manual, and transformants were selected on SD/Leu−/Ura− plates. Drop tests were subsequently performed on SD/Leu−/Ura− and SD/Leu−/5-FOA plates. After incubation for 48–96 h, clones that grew very slowly or could not grow on the SD/Leu−/5-FOA plate (5-FOAs) and thus could not lose the rescuing thrS+ plasmid were chosen as candidates harboring inactive ThrRS genes. Mutated p425TEF-ScThrRS plasmids were recovered from the colonies that appeared on original SD/Leu−/Ura− plates, and the thrS genes were sequenced.
Subsequently, control wild-type thrS and mutated thrS genes were cloned into a modified p425TEF(His) vector, which allows expression of the mutated thrS genes with a C-terminal His tag, facilitating subsequent quantification of the protein amount. The resulting constructs were introduced into ScΔthrS to confirm the phenotypes, eliminating any side effects of mutations occurring at other sites in the selection plasmid.
Preparation of Yeast Cell Lysates and Western Blot Assay
Clones sensitive to 5-FOA were grown on SD/Leu−/Ura− liquid medium. The yeast expressed the genes from both the rescue-plasmid (pRS426-ScThrRS (without His6 tag)) and the selection plasmid (p425TEF(His)-ScThrRS mutant (with His6 tag)). Western blot was performed with an antibody directed against the His6 tag to detect the amount of ScThrRS and its variants in vivo. Yeast cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. Cells were resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 50 mm sodium phosphate (pH 8.0), 300 mm NaCl, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 10% glycerol and lysed in a glass bead grinder at 4 °C for 20 min (28).
Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked in PBS plus 0.05% Tween 20 buffer containing 5% nonfat dry milk. Membranes were separately immunoblotted with either anti-His6 antibody or anti-GAPDH antibody. After incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, the light emission was monitored using LAS4000 (FUJIFILM) and the SuperSignal West Pico Trial Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Results were quantified using Multi Gauge version 3.0 software (FUJIFILM), and the amounts of ScThrRS or variants were normalized to the GAPDH amount. The amount of wild-type ScThrRS from the selection plasmid was designed as 100%.
Cloning and Expression of ScThrRS Gene and tRNAThr Transcription
pET22b-ScThrRS was constructed to obtain C-terminal His6-tagged ThrRS in E. coli in our laboratory (21). Here, the mutated thrS genes (including point and deletion mutations) were constructed using the KOD-plus mutagenesis kit, and mutants were identified by DNA sequencing. Gene expression and protein purification of ScThrRS and its mutants were performed as previously reported (21). Transcripts of SctRNAThr (AGU, CGU, and UGU) were obtained by in vitro T7 RNA polymerase run-off transcription, as described previously (21).
Measurements of Kinetic Parameters, Deacylation, and AMP Formation
Km and kcat values of ScThrRS for amino acid in the Thr activation reaction and for tRNAThr isoacceptors (including AGU, CGU, and UGU) in the aminoacylation reaction were determined as described previously (21).
Misaminoacylated Ser-tRNAThr(AGU) (Ser-tRNAThr) was obtained via mischarging with Ser by ScThrRS-H151A/H155A (21). The deacylation activities of ScThrRS variants for mischarged [14C]Ser-tRNAThr were measured as reported previously (21). Editing activities were also determined by measuring the AMP formation in the presence of the non-cognate Ser. AMP formation was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates according to previous studies (29, 30) with adjustment for conditions for ScThrRS (21).
Measurement of Equilibrium Dissociation Constants (kd) for tRNA by Filter Binding Assays
The nitrocellulose filter binding method was used to monitor ScThrRS-[32P]tRNAThr complex formation (31). Nitrocellulose membranes (0.22 μm) were presoaked in washing buffer (50 mm potassium phosphate (pH 5.5), 50 mm MgCl2). Binding assays were performed at 4 °C for 30 min in a 50-μl reaction mixture containing 60 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mm MgCl2, 5 mm DTT, 56 nm SctRNAThr(AGU) (20,000 cpm, containing 1 nm [32P]SctRNAThr(AGU)), and various concentrations of ScThrRSs (1–20 μm). The samples were then applied and filtered through the nitrocellulose membrane. The filters were washed with 0.3 ml of washing buffer and dried, and the radioactivity was counted. Data analysis using GraphPad PRISM software produced the kd values.
Cell Culture, Transfection, and Co-immunoprecipitation
The genes of wild-type ScThrRS, and its mutants ScThrRS-G356N and -P627L were amplified from their pET22b constructs and then cloned into eukaryotic expression vectors pCMV-3Tag-3A (with a C-terminal 3×FLAG tag) and pCMV-3Tag-4A (with a C-terminal 3×c-Myc tag).
Plasmid pCMV-3Tag-4A-ScThrRS, together with either pCMV-3Tag-3A-ScThrRS or pCMV-3Tag-3A, was co-transfected in HEK293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 to express the genes of FLAG- or c-Myc-ScThrRS, according to a method described previously (32). The same method was used to express the genes of ScThrRS-G356N and -P627L. After transfection for 36 h, cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and lysed with lysis buffer (20 mm HEPES (pH 7.5), 100 mm NaCl, 0.2 mm EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mm KF, 0.02 mg/ml protease inhibitor mixture). Cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. To immunoprecipitate ScThrRS and its variants, the cell lysates were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-FLAG antibodies and then conjugated to agarose beads according to the Protein A/G-agarose manual (Abmart). Samples of whole cell lysates and immune complexes were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and detected by Western blot using anti-FLAG or anti-c-Myc antibody.
Complementation Assays by HsThrRS Mutants
Wild-type HsThrRS was cloned into p425TEF(His). Mutations corresponding to selected mutants in ScThrRS were introduced into the HsThrRS gene by site-directed mutagenesis. The genes of mutated HsThrRSs were introduced into ScΔthrS and selected on SD/Leu−/Ura− plates. A single colony of each transformant was grown in liquid SD/Leu−/Ura− medium. To perform comparative drop tests, yeast cultures were diluted to 1 A600, and the same volume was dropped on SD/Leu−/5-FOA plates. The level of growth and complementation was roughly quantified after comparison with that of ScΔthrS strains containing HsThrRS variants or ScThrRS. The amounts of wild-type HsThrRS and variants in ScΔthrS were checked by Western blot using the anti-His6 antibody as described above.
RESULTS
Selection and Identification of 11 Growth-deficient or Lethal Mutations in Yeast thrS Library
Random mutagenesis coupled with in vivo selection was used to screen the expression of all thrS genes to identify crucial positions in ScThrRS involved in synthetic or editing catalysis, substrate binding, folding, and stability. Hydroxylamine mutagenesis was used to produce a thrS library harboring single or few mutations. The library was screened in the yeast thrS knock-out strain ScΔthrS for the ability of the mutated genes to replace the rescuing plasmid harboring a URA3 gene. 5000 colonies from the library were screened, and 31 clones were shown to be 5-FOA-sensitive and unable to lose the rescuing thrS+, Ura+ plasmid. The full-length ScThrRS gene of the 31 mutants was sequenced. All 31 mutations were found to be G→A or C→T transitions, which is consistent with the deamination properties of hydroxylamine (26). Among them, 20 of the selected genes carried nonsense mutations at variable positions. In addition, two lethal clones simultaneously harbored two mutations in their ORFs (M70K/Q629stop and W150stop/S201F). To determine which mutation was responsible for the lethal phenotype, we isolated the two missense mutations and two nonsense mutations by mutagenesis and tested them in ScΔthrS strain. The assay confirmed that mutations W150stop and Q629stop were lethal, whereas M70K and S201F were viable (data not shown). Thus, two nonsense mutations (W150stop and Q629stop) were responsible for the lethality of the two lethal clones. However, too many residues were truncated in these two nonsense mutations, with 585 and 106 residues, respectively, in W150stop and Q629stop. Therefore, no further investigation was performed on ScThrRS-W150stop or -Q629stop mutant. Interestingly, two lethal nonsense mutations (Q704stop and Q719stop) introduced stop codons that were only 31 and 16 residues from the C terminus, suggesting an important function of the C-terminal domain of the enzyme. The remaining 11 mutations were missense mutations. Two of them (G145D and P627L) were identified twice, and the other seven (S308F, G356N, S457F, G458D, R461H, G604E, and G685D) were found only once.
Therefore, 11 different mutants with growth-deficient or lethal phenotypes, including ScThrRS-G145D, -S308F, -G356N, -S457F, -G458D, -R461H, -G604E, -P627L, -G685D, -Q704stop, and -Q719stop, were found in the thrS library (Fig. 1A and Table 1). The 11 mutated thrS genes were cloned into vector p425TEF(His), and the constructs were re-introduced into ScΔthrS strain to confirm the lethal or growth-impaired phenotypes on SD/Leu−/5-FOA medium. The yeast ScΔthrS containing ScThrRS-G145D and -S457F was growth-deficient; the other mutations were lethal (Fig. 2A). Western blot showed that the genes of all mutants could express in yeast (Fig. 2B). Therefore, the inability of those mutants to support yeast growth was probably due to their reduced amount and/or their decreased enzymatic activities and not to an incapacity for mutated gene expression. The amounts of the mutant proteins were different, from 5% (G145D) to about 80% (S457F, G458D, and G685D) of the amount of the wild-type ScThrRS (Fig. 2C), which was probably caused by protein instability and/or degradation.
TABLE 1.
Selected ScThrRS mutations, their growth phenotypes, corresponding residues in EcThrRS, and location in the protein domains
| ScThrRS mutations | Growth phenotype | Corresponding EcThrRS residues | Protein domain |
|---|---|---|---|
| R52F | Lethal | No equivalenta | N-extension |
| M70K | Normal | Not analyzedb | |
| G145D | Deficient | Gly67 | |
| S201F | Normal | Not analyzedb | N2 (editing) |
| S308F | Lethal | Ala222 | |
| G356N | Lethal | Gly270 | Aminoacylation |
| S457F | Deficient | His371 | |
| G458D | Lethal | Gly372 | |
| R461H | Lethal | Arg375 | |
| G604E | Lethal | Gly516 | |
| P627L | Lethal | Pro539 | |
| G685D | Lethal | Gly597 | Anticodon binding |
| Q704Stop | Lethal | Asp615 | |
| Q719Stop | Lethal | Gln630 |
a Arg52 is located in the eukaryote-specific N-extension domain and thus has no equivalent in EcThrRS.
b M70K and S201F were not studied (see “Results”).
FIGURE 2.
Twelve mutants exhibited lethal or growth-deficient phenotypes. A, ScThrRS-R52F, -G145D, -S308F, -G349N, -S457F, -G458D, -R461H, -G604E, -P627L, -G685D, -Q704stop, and -Q719stop were cloned into p425TEF(His) and introduced in strain ScΔthrS, where the growth phenotypes were confirmed. Wild-type ScThrRS and empty p425TEF(His) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Drop tests were performed on SD/Leu−/5-FOA plate with an equal number of cells. B, Western blot (WB) showing the amounts of different ScThrRS mutants. GAPDH was used as a control. C, quantification of the Western blot. The amounts of ScThrRS mutants were normalized according to the endogenous GAPDH. The amount of wild-type ScThrRS was designed as 100%. Relative protein amounts were calculated based on at least two independent Western blot assays and shown in parentheses with S.D. values omitted for clarity. D, corresponding residues (shown as red spheres) are shown on the crystallographic structure of EcThrRS-tRNAThr complex (Protein Data Bank code 1QF6). The protein modules are colored green (editing domain), cyan (catalytic domain), and orange (anti-codon binding domain). tRNAThr is shown in pink. Error bars, S.D.
According to the crystallographic structure of the EcThrRS-tRNAThr complex (14), the mutations in the enzyme were localized. The mutations were clustered in the three main functional domains of ScThrRS. Two mutations, G145D and S308F, were located in the editing domain; six mutations (G356N, S457F, G458D, R461H, G604E, and P627L) were clustered in the aminoacylation active site; and three mutations (G685D, Q704stop, and Q719stop) were co-localized in the tRNA anticodon binding domain (Figs. 1A and 2D).
Mutations in the N2 Domain Decrease the Editing Activity
G145D and S308F were located in the second half of the editing domain (N2 domain). G145D induced a severe growth defect compared with native enzyme, whereas S308F induced complete lethality. When comparing the ThrRS sequences, it appeared that Gly145 is only a semiconserved residue and is often an Ala residue in other eukaryotic ThrRSs. On the other hand, Ser308 is a highly conserved residue (Fig. 1C). To explore the effect of the mutations on the catalytic properties of the enzyme, the genes of two mutated His-tagged proteins were overexpressed in E. coli, and the mutants were purified by Ni2+ affinity chromatography. The Thr activation parameters of ScThrRS-G145D and -S308F showed unmodified Km and a slight decrease in kcat (2.6 ± 0.2 and 2.4 ± 0.2 s−1, respectively) compared with that of the wild-type kcat (3.2 ± 0.1 s−1; Table 2). In the tRNAThr-charging reaction, the kcat values of both mutants were significantly decreased, retaining only 11 and 5% of the value for the native enzyme. However, the kd and Km values of the two mutants for tRNAThr were slightly increased. Their catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km) were 11.4- and 32.5-fold lower, respectively, than the wild type (Tables 3 and 4). These results showed that both mutations had little effect on Thr activation and the affinity for tRNAThr but obviously decreased the rate of tRNA aminoacylation, despite their presence in the N2 editing domain. Notably, the mutations are located at the interface between the editing and aminoacylation domains (Fig. 2D), suggesting a distal effect on the synthetic active site. The mutations may disturb the subtle structure of the active site and thus affect the rate of aminoacylation. Moreover, Western blot showed that in vivo, the amounts of ScThrRS-G145D and -S308F were significantly decreased compared with that of native enzyme (Fig. 2, B and C). Taken together, the results suggested that the deleterious effect of the mutations might act both at the catalytic level and on the enzyme concentration in the cell.
TABLE 2.
Kinetic parameters of ScThrRS and its variants for Thr in amino acid activation reaction
| Enzyme | kcata | Kma | kcat/Km | Relative kcat/Km | Loss of catalytic efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s−1 | mm | mm−1 s−1 | % | -fold | |
| WT | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 14.6 | 100 | |
| R52F | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 5.7 | 39.1 | 2.6 |
| R52A | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 7.5 | 51.7 | 1.9 |
| R52D | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 0.26 ± 0.05 | 6.1 | 42.0 | 2.4 |
| R52K | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 15.5 | 106.4 | |
| G145D | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 12.0 | 81.9 | 1.2 |
| S308F | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 9.9 | 67.7 | 1.5 |
| G356N | NMb | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| S457F | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 10.4 | 71.0 | 1.4 |
| G458D | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 29.2 |
| R461H | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 29.8 |
| G604E | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| P627L | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| G685D | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 16.4 | 112.4 | |
| C-Δ3 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 9.7 | 66.6 | 1.5 |
| C-Δ5 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 0.38 ± 0.09 | 7.4 | 50.7 | 2.0 |
| C-Δ10 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 0.43 ± 0.14 | 7.1 | 48.6 | 2.1 |
a The results are shown as the average of three independent trials ± S.D.
b NM, activity too low to be measured.
TABLE 3.
Kinetic parameters of ScThrRS and its variants for tRNAThr (AGU) in aminoacylation reaction
| Enzyme | kcata | Kma | kcat/Km | Relative kcat/Km | Loss of catalytic efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ×10−2 s−1 | μm | mm−1 s−1 | % | -fold | |
| WT | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 24.7 | 100 | |
| R52F | NMb | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| R52A | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 23.1 |
| R52D | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| R52K | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 13.6 | 54.8 | 1.8 |
| G145D | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 2.2 | 8.7 | 11.4 |
| S308F | 0. 14 ± 0.01 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 32.5 |
| G356N | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| S457F | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 20.0 |
| G458D | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| R461H | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| G604E | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| P627L | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| G685D | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
| C-Δ3 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 10.4 | 42.1 | 2.4 |
| C-Δ5 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 5.6 | 37.3 | 4.4 |
| C-Δ10 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 5.1 | 26.2 | 4.9 |
a The results are shown as the average of three independent trials ± S.D.
b NM, activity too low to be measured.
TABLE 4.
kd of ScThrRS for SctRNAThr (AGU) in filter binding reaction at 4 °C
| Enzyme | kda |
|---|---|
| μm | |
| WT | 3.3 ± 0.3 |
| R52F | 3.0 ± 0.2 |
| R52D | 3.1 ± 0.5 |
| G145D | 3.0 ± 0.8 |
| G356N | 13 ± 3 |
| S308F | 3.0 ± 0.3 |
| S457F | 3.8 ± 0.5 |
| G458D | 3.1 ± 0.5 |
| R461H | 3.2 ± 0.5 |
| P627L | 19 ± 5 |
| G685D | 3.9 ± 0.9 |
a The results are shown as the average of three independent trials ± S.D.
Gly145 and Ser308 are located in the N2 domain; therefore, the editing activities of ScThrRS-G145D and -S308F were monitored. In the absence of tRNAThr and in the presence of Ser as the non-cognate amino acid, the kobs of ScThrRS-G145D in AMP formation was (3.1 ± 0.2) × 10−3 s−1, which was similar to the (2.8 ± 0.8) × 10−3 s−1 of the native enzyme. For ScThrRS-S308F, the kobs for AMP formation was significantly decreased to (0.5 ± 0.1) × 10−3 s−1 (Table 5 and Fig. 3A). Therefore, S308F might be the first identified mutation of eukaryotic ThrRSs to affect tRNA-independent pretransfer editing. In the presence of tRNAThr, which measured the total editing reaction, the kobs values of ScThrRS-G145D and -S308F in AMP formation reaction were (4.1 ± 0.4) × 10−3 s−1 and (2.9 ± 0.4) × 10−3 s−1, respectively, representing only 27.5 and 19.4% of the wild-type activity (Table 5 and Fig. 3A). Moreover, a deacylation assay of preformed mischarged Ser-tRNAThr was performed. The deacylation curves showed that both mutants were unable to hydrolyze mischarged Ser-tRNAThr (Fig. 3B).
TABLE 5.
kobs of AMP formation of ScThrRS and derivatives in the presence of Ser
| Enzyme | tRNA | kobsa | Relative kobs |
|---|---|---|---|
| ×10−3 s−1 | % | ||
| WT | − | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 18.9 |
| + | 14.9 ± 0.8 | 100 | |
| R52F | − | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 2.1 |
| + | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 4.0 | |
| G145D | − | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 20.6 |
| + | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 27.5 | |
| S308F | − | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 3.4 |
| + | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 19.4 | |
| C-Δ3 | − | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 9.3 |
| + | 13.4 ± 0.9 | 89.9 | |
| C-Δ5 | − | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 7.1 |
| + | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 54.9 | |
| C-Δ10 | − | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 6.2 |
| + | 7.7 ± 0.5 | 51.7 |
a The results are shown as the average of three independent trials ± S.D.
FIGURE 3.

Editing properties of mutants ScThrRS-G145D and -S308F. A, quantification of AMP formation in the presence of Ser and absence of tRNA by ScThrRS-WT (○), -G145D (□), and -S308F (▵) or in the presence of tRNA by ScThrRS-WT (●), -G145D (■), and -S308F (▴). B, deacylation assay of mischarged Ser-tRNAThr by ScThrRS-G145D (□), -S308F (▵), and -WT (●). Spontaneous deacylation of Ser-tRNAThr (○) was included as a control. Error bars, S.D.
Thus, the results showed that the G145D mutation impacted the tRNA-dependent editing activity but not the tRNA-independent editing. However, both the tRNA-independent and -dependent editing activities of the ScThrRS-S308F were impaired. Although the two residues are not located in the previously identified editing pocket (17), their mutations have a profound effect on the editing activity of eukaryotic ThrRS.
Mutations G356N and P627L Impair Dimer Formation
Amino acid activation and tRNA aminoacylation assays showed that ScThrRS-G356N and -P627L had completely lost their synthetic activity (Table 2 and 3). Moreover, the kd values for tRNA mostly increased (Table 4). However, the crystal structure of EcThrRS showed that Gly270 and Pro539 of EcThrRS, the corresponding residues of Gly356 and Pro627 in ScThrRS, are located far from the catalytic center (Fig. 4A) (14). In the case of EcThrRS, Gly270 is located in a α-helix at the interface of the subunits of the EcThrRS dimer, just before specific motif 1 of class II aaRSs (14). Hydrogen bonds, salt bonds, and hydrophobic interactions connect the α-helix of one subunit and a peptide loop of another subunit (Fig. 4B). For instance, residue Trp271 (adjacent of Gly270) is located at only 2.71 Å from Glu292 of another subunit (Fig. 4C). Therefore, the flexible residue Gly at position 270 might control the conformation of the interface, and the introduction of a bulky and more rigid Asn residue at this site probably caused a local structural rearrangement and influenced the dense network of interactions of the interface.
FIGURE 4.
Impact of mutations G356N and P627L on the dimerization of ScThrRS. A, view of the location of G356N and P627L in the two subunits (colored cyan and green) of the EcThrRS dimer (Protein Data Bank code 1QF6). The mutated residues are colored red. B, hydrogen bonds, salt bonds, and hydrophobic interactions are found at the interface of the two subunits (colored cyan and green, respectively) of EcThrRS dimer. The mutated residue Gly270 (corresponding to Gly356 in ScThrRS) is colored red. C, Trp271 is within bonding distance of Glu292 of the other subunit. D, HEK293T cells were co-transfected with pCMV-3Tag-4A-ScThrRS (c-Myc-tagged ScThrRS) in the presence of pCMV-3Tag-3A-ScThrRS (FLAG-tagged ScThrRS) or control vector pCMV-3Tag-3A. The same procedures were performed for mutants ScThrRS-G356N and -P627L. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibodies conjugated to agarose beads. Western blot (WB) was carried out to detect whether c-Myc-tagged proteins were co-immunoprecipitated (IP) with FLAG-tagged proteins. Error bars, S.D.
The second mutated residue, Pro627 in ScThrRS, the equivalent of Pro539 in EcThrRS, is located in the linker loop connecting the aminoacylation and anticodon binding domains (Figs. 2D and 4A) (14). When a Leu residue replaced the rigid Pro in the P627L mutant, the loop was probably able to become more flexible and adopt a different conformation, which influenced the dimer interface.
Therefore, we assumed that mutations G356N and P627L might be damaging for dimerization of ScThrRS. This could also explain the low amount of protein found in yeast cells, because the isolated subunits might be unstable and subjected to degradation (Fig. 2B). To test this assumption, the genes of FLAG- and c-Myc-tagged wild-type ScThrRS or ScThrRS-G356N or -P627L were co-expressed in HEK293T cells. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibodies. Western blot showed that c-Myc-tagged wild-type ScThrRS could be readily co-immunoprecipitated by the anti-FLAG antibody (Fig. 4D), suggesting that c-Myc-ScThrRS and FLAG-ScThrRS subunits could form “heterodimers,” as expected. In sharp contrast, neither c-Myc-tagged ScThrRS-G356N nor -P627L could be co-immunoprecipitated by the anti-FLAG antibody, despite the fact that both FLAG-tagged ScThrRS-G356N and -P627L were well immunoprecipitated by the anti-FLAG antibodies (Fig. 4D). Thus, FLAG/c-Myc-tagged ScThrRS-G356N and -P627L were unable to form “heterodimers.” These results suggested that the failure to dimerize might be the cause of the lethal phenotype observed with the two mutants. In vivo, the single subunits are probably subjected to a rapid degradation, as observed by the low content of mutated ScThrRS found in the yeast cells (Fig. 2, B and C).
Lethal Mutations in the Synthetic Active Site Domain
One lethal mutation (G604E) was found in the class II-defining synthetase motif 3. In class II synthetases, Gly residues and other small residues are often found in the β-strand preceding the invariant Arg residue (Arg618 of ScThrRS) (24). These small residues form the ATP-binding cavity and replacement of a Gly in a class II synthetase by a charged residue affected the enzyme activity to alter the enzyme conformation (24). In the case of EcThrRS, the equivalent residue Gly516 (Gly604 of ScThrRS) is only at 3.01 Å from the AMP moiety of activated Thr-AMP (Fig. 5, A and B). Furthermore, its adjacent residue, Ser517, directly contacts the AMP moiety by hydrogen bonding (14, 33). Therefore, the introduction of a negatively charged Glu residue might create a spatial hindrance with the base moiety of AMP with consequences for Thr-AMP formation. Indeed, amino acid activation kinetics showed that ScThrRS-G604E was completely deficient in Thr activation and tRNAThr charging (Tables 2 and 3). Western blot also showed that the lethal effect observed in the yeast was not the consequence of protein instability because the mutation had little impact on the protein quantity (Fig. 2C).
FIGURE 5.

Representations of several key residues analyzed in the present study and the network of interactions with AMP and tRNA in the catalytic center of EcThrRS. A, location of mutated residues in the catalytic center in the EcThrRS structure (Protein Data Bank code 1QF6). Motif 2 β-sheets, motif 2 loop, motif 3 β-sheet, and tRNA are colored orange, green, pink, and cyan, respectively. Residues His371, Gly372, Arg375, and Gly516 (corresponding to Ser457, Gly458, Arg461, and Gly604 of ScThrRS) are colored red. B, schematic representation showing the distance from Gly516 or Gly372 to the 2′-hydroxyl group of the AMP substrate. C, schematic representation showing the distance between His371 and G70 of the tRNA. D, schematic representation showing the distance between Gly597 (corresponding to Gly685 of ScThrRS) and G35 of the tRNA.
Interestingly, three mutations (S457F, G458D, and R461H) were clustered in the motif 2 loop. The motif 2 loop (residues 449–463 in ScThrRS) is part of signature motif 2, connecting two antiparallel β-strands. In class II synthetases (34–36), this loop plays a critical role during catalysis by participating in the binding of amino acid, ATP, and the acceptor end of the tRNA.
Gly372 in EcThrRS (corresponding to Gly458 in ScThrRS) is far from AMP and does not contact the substrates (Fig. 5B) (14). However, here we showed that the lethal mutant ScThrRS-G458D nearly abolished Thr activation, with only 3.4% of remaining catalytic efficiency compared with the wild-type ScThrRS. Both the Km and kcat values for Thr were responsible for this drop and were obviously increased and decreased, respectively (Table 2). The severe decrease in amino acid activation was accompanied by a total loss of tRNA aminoacylation activity, which became non-measurable (Table 3). However, the kd for tRNAThr was unchanged, suggesting that a loss of tRNA binding was not responsible for this inactivation (Table 4). In EcThrRS, Gly372 ends the loop connecting the two β-strands of motif 2 (14). Adding the negatively charged side chain of Asp at this position might have modified the geometry and flexibility of the loop and following β-strand with consequent effects on the catalytic properties. Nevertheless, the structural effect probably remained local because the mutant was stable in yeast cells (Fig. 2, B and C).
EcThrRS uses the strictly conserved basic residue Arg375 in motif 2 loop to recognize nucleotide C74 of tRNAThr by two base-specific hydrogen bonds (14). Arg375 also stabilizes the γ-phosphate of ATP during the amino acid activation step and then switches to C74 after completion of amino acid activation and pyrophosphate departure (33). A lethal mutation of Arg461 (R461H) of ScThrRS, corresponding to Arg375 from EcThrRS, was isolated in our selection. The amino acid activation assay showed that R461H induced a 30-fold decrease in catalytic efficiency, with a 10-fold increase of Km for Thr and a 3-fold decrease in kcat (Table 2). tRNA charging of ScThrRS-R461H was also undetectable; however, the kd value for tRNAThr was similar to that of the wild type, which indicated that the tRNA binding site was essentially intact in the mutant (Tables 3 and 4). Western blot showed that the quantity of ScThrRS-R461H was close to that of wild-type ScThrRS, suggesting that the mutation did not affect the protein stability (Fig. 2, B and C).
The third mutation selected at position 457 (S457F) of the motif 2 loop in ScThrRS slightly damaged the catalytic efficiency in amino acid activation, indicated by the slightly increased Km for Thr (Table 2). The corresponding His371 residue of EcThrRS is more than 4 Å from nucleotides 68–69 of tRNAThr (Fig. 5, A and C). Here, this mutation induced a 20-fold drop of the catalytic efficiency in tRNA aminoacylation, mainly caused by a decrease of the kcat, whereas the Km and kd for tRNAThr were almost unchanged (Tables 3 and 4). However, despite this severe reduction of aminoacylation activity, slight growth of the ScΔthrS strain could be observed (Fig. 2A), suggesting that the threshold of cell lethality was close to, but below, this value of remaining activity.
Mutations in the C-terminal Domain
In the crystal structure of EcThrRS, Gly597 (the counterpart of Gly685 of ScThrRS, selected as a lethal mutation, G685D) is located in the anticodon binding module of EcThrRS, in close proximity of the anticodon of tRNAThr, which contains G35 and U36, two major identity elements of EcThrRS (14, 37). The distance between the carboxyl group of Gly597 and G35 is only 2.96 Å (Fig. 5D). Therefore, the presence of the Asp side chain in the selected ScThrRS-G685D mutant might have created steric hindrance, charge repulsion, and/or loss of flexibility, potentially leading to tRNA rejection or weaker accommodation of the anticodon nucleotides. Remarkably, ScThrRS-G685D exhibited intact amino acid-activating properties but was unable to aminoacylate tRNAThr (Tables 2 and 3). However, the total loss of tRNA-charging activity was not caused by a reduction of tRNAThr affinity (Table 4). The quantity of ScThrRS-G685D was the same as the native ScThrRS in the ScΔthrS strain (Fig. 2C), suggesting that the protein was correctly folded and stable in vivo.
Deletions of the C terminus of ScThrRS (mutants Q704stop and Q719stop, −31 and −16 residues, respectively) failed to complement the growth of ScΔthrS strain and induced very low amounts compared with the wild-type enzyme (Fig. 2, A and C). These observations suggested that the last residues play a crucial role in the activity of ScThrRS and in protein stability. In addition, mutants ScThrRS-Q704stop and -Q719stop formed inclusion bodies in E. coli and could not be purified for further studies. Therefore, to study the function of the very end residues of the C terminus, we used site-directed mutagenesis to delete the 3, 5, or 10 last residues of ScThrRS. In the amino acid activation reaction, the three mutants, ScThrRS-C-Δ3, -C-Δ5, and -C-Δ10, exhibited virtually unchanged properties except for a moderate increase in the Km for Thr (Table 2). In the aminoacylation reaction, the three mutants displayed progressive decreases in their aminoacylation properties of 2.4-, 4.4-, and 4.9-fold, respectively, compared with wild-type ScThrRS. The catalytic constant kcat was mainly responsible for the decrease, and the Km for tRNA was almost unchanged (Table 3). Despite the loss of tRNA-charging activity, the three mutants were equally able to rescue the ScΔthrS strain as well as wild-type ScThrRS (Fig. 6A), suggesting that partial activity of ScThrRS is sufficient to sustain yeast growth. Thus, the C-terminal truncations harbor lower and lower enzymatic activities as the length of C terminus diminished; a 16-residue truncation (Q719stop), being inactive for normal physiological growth, more severely impaired the enzymatic activities.
FIGURE 6.
Complementation phenotypes and Ser-tRNAThr deacylation activities of C-terminal truncated ScThrRS mutants. A, drop test assay showing the complementation of the ScΔthrS strain by the three deleted mutants. Wild-type ScThrRS and empty vector p425TEF(His) were used as controls. B, deacylation activities of ScThrRS-WT (●) or -C-Δ3 (□), -C-Δ5 (▵), or -C-Δ10 (▿). Spontaneous deacylation of Ser-tRNAThr (○) was included as a control. Error bar, S.D.
The C-terminal domain of ThrRS binds the anticodon loop of tRNA (14). Because tRNA binding is responsible for tRNA-dependent pretransfer editing and post-transfer editing, we checked whether deletions of the C-terminal residues might affect the editing properties of ScThrRS. We measured AMP formation in the presence of Ser and performed mischarged tRNA deacylation assays. The three mutants showed a decrease in both tRNA-independent pretransfer editing and total editing activity, especially C-Δ5 and C-Δ10 (Table 5). However, deacylation of Ser-tRNAThr by post-transfer editing was unaffected by the deletions (Fig. 6B), suggesting that the three mutants could still bind charged tRNA, and truncations of C-terminal amino acid residues had negligible influence on tRNA binding and subsequent editing by deacylating misaminoacylated tRNA.
Arg52 Library Screening Revealed Pleiotropic Effects on ScThrRS Properties
Like many other eukaryotic aaRSs, eukaryotic ThrRSs have additional N-extensions whose functions are not yet understood. Our previous study on ScThrRS showed that mutants deleted of the first 40 and 65 residues (ScThrRS-Δ40 and ScThrRS-Δ65, respectively) could rescue the thrS knock-out strain; however, ScThrRS-Δ40 mutant exhibited only 25% of the wild-type charging activity, mainly because of loss of tRNA affinity (21). Examining the N-extensions of eukaryotic ThrRSs revealed the presence of several conserved or invariant residues. Arg52 in ScThrRS is one of two invariant residues (Fig. 1B). Positively charged residues are potentially able to interact with the negatively charged phosphate groups of tRNA and/or form hydrogen bond interaction with other amino acid residues (especially acid amino acid residues); therefore, we decided to study this residue using a degenerated library containing all possible amino acids at position 52. The library was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis with a randomly mutagenized primer. The Arg52 library was then introduced into the ScΔthrS strain harboring the rescuing plasmid pRS426-ScThrRS. 160 colonies (5 times the theoretical size library) were tested on 5-FOA-containing plates. 10 clones that could not grow on these plates contained a nonsense mutation at position 52 causing premature translation arrest. Three other clones shared a missense mutation (R52F). The gene of ScThrRS-R52F was cloned into p425TEF(His) vector and reintroduced into ScΔthrS, which confirmed its lethality for yeast (Fig. 2A).
To further analyze the lethal effect of ScThrRS-R52F, we overexpressed its gene in E. coli and purified it. An amino acid activation assay showed that the mutant had an unchanged Km for Thr (0.23 ± 0.02 mm; wild-type, 0.22 ± 0.02 mm). However, the catalytic rate constant (kcat) of the mutant was lower (1.3 ± 0.1 s−1) compared with that of the wild-type enzyme (3.2 ± 0.1 s−1), leading to a 2.6-fold drop in the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) (Table 2). In contrast to amino acid activation, tRNAThr charging by mutant ScThrRS-R52F was too low to measure (Table 3). This result suggested that a deficiency of tRNA charging was responsible for R52F lethality.
Arg52 is located in the N-extension that is appended to the editing domain; therefore, we checked if the mutation affected the editing activity. In the absence or presence of tRNAThr, the observed rate constants (kobs) of ScThrRS-R52F for AMP formation were (0.3 ± 0.1) × 10−3 s−1 and (0.6 ± 0.2) × 10−3 s−1, respectively (Table 5). The latter actually reflected whole editing activities, including tRNA-independent and -dependent pretransfer editing and post-transfer editing. These results revealed an obvious decrease in the tRNA-dependent and tRNA-independent editing properties. Further deacylation assay of mischarged tRNAThr (Ser-tRNAThr) confirmed that ScThrRS-R52F was defective in post-transfer editing (Fig. 7A). Post-transfer editing requires proper binding of mischarged tRNAThr and the presence of active editing residues. Arg52 is located in the N-extension, whose structure has not been solved; therefore, it would be highly speculative to try explaining the molecular effect of the mutation. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that the conformation of ScThrRS-R52F has been altered by the mutation. Indeed, the amount of R52F in the yeast cells was nearly undetectable by Western blot (Fig. 2, B and C), indicating that the mutation had an effect on protein stability or conformation or both, together with significant effects on aminoacylation and editing activities.
FIGURE 7.

Arg52 mutants strongly affected ScThrRS enzymatic activities and stability. A, deacylation assay of Ser-tRNAThr catalyzed by ScThrRS-WT (●), -R52K (■), or -R52F (□). Spontaneous hydrolysis of Ser-tRNAThr (○) was also performed as a control. B, drop test of ScΔthrS strains harboring ScThrRS-R52A, -R52D, or -R52K on SD/Leu−/5-FOA plate. Cells harboring ScThrRS or empty p425TEF(His) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. C, Western blot showing the amounts of different ScThrRS mutants in the N-extension. GAPDH was used as a loading control. D, quantification of the Western blot (WB), which has been normalized to the GAPDH control. The amount of wild-type ScThrRS was designated as 100%. Relative protein amounts were calculated based on at least two independent Western blot assays and shown in parentheses with S.D. values omitted for clarity. Error bars, S.D.
For a better understanding of the effect of R52F, and despite the fact that the Arg52 library theoretically covered all possible mutations, we performed additional site-directed mutagenesis at the Arg52 position. We substituted Arg52 for Ala (smaller side chain), Asp (negatively charged), and Lys (positively charged). In the amino acid activation reaction, ScThrRS-R52K, -R52A, and -R52D displayed Km values similar to that of the wild-type ScThrRS and catalytic efficiencies of 106.4, 51.7, and 42.0%, respectively (Table 2). Surprisingly, tRNA-charging assays showed that mutant ScThrRS-R52D was totally unable to aminoacylate tRNAThr. Mutants ScThrRS-R52A and -R52K displayed unchanged Km values, but the kcat of ScThrRS-R52A for tRNA charging was dramatically decreased, leading to a global loss of catalytic efficiency of nearly 25.7-fold (Table 3). The catalytic efficiency of ScThrRS-R52K decreased by 1.8-fold compared with that of wild-type (Table 3). Further hydrolysis of mischarged Ser-tRNAThr showed that R52K moderately decreased the post-transfer editing activity (Fig. 7A). These biochemical data confirmed that Arg52 is important for the aminoacylation and editing activities, although the residue was replaced by the same charge Lys. When the three ScThrRS-R52D, -R52A, and -R52K mutants were tested for complementation of the ScΔthrS strain, it appeared that ScThrRS-R52D was lethal to yeast, whereas ScThrRS-R52A and -R52K could rescue ScΔthrS similarly to the wild-type ScThrRS (Fig. 7B). Western blot analysis of yeast extracts showed that the amount of ScThrRS-R52K was equal to the wild-type ScThrRS (Fig. 7, C and D). In contrast, the amounts of ScThrRS-R52A and -R52D were significantly decreased, to 2.7 and 4.6%, respectively (Fig. 7, C and D). This observation supported the hypothesis that Arg52 is critical for protein stability. It is also remarkable that ScThrRS-R52A was able to rescue the thrS knock-out strain with only of the amount of wild-type protein and a 23.1-fold loss of aminoacylation activity. However, this extremely low activity of ScThrRS-R52A was measured with the transcript of tRNAThr(AGU), and yeast contains three different tRNAThr isoacceptors to decode the four Thr codons; therefore, ScThrRS-R52A might be more active for one or both of the two other isoacceptors.
With this suspicion in mind, we decided to further analyze the kinetic parameters of ScThrRS-R52A for other isoacceptors during aminoacylation. We therefore used in vitro transcription to synthesize the two other isoacceptors (CGU and UGU) and determined their charging capacities. The catalytic efficiencies of ScThrRS-R52A for CGU and UGU reached 5.7 and 6.7%, respectively, compared with the wild-type enzyme (Table 6). These values were about 1.5-fold higher, but not much better, than that of transcript AGU (relative kcat/Km = 4.3%) and confirmed that only a very small fraction of tRNAThr-accepting activity is sufficient to support protein synthesis in vivo.
TABLE 6.
Catalytic kinetic parameters of ScThrRS-WT and -R52A in the tRNA aminoacylation reaction
| Kinetic parametersa | WT | R52A |
|---|---|---|
| Transcript CGU | ||
| kcat (×10−2 s−1) | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.03 |
| Km (μm) | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| Relative kcat/Km (%) | 100 | 5.7 |
| Transcript UGU | ||
| kcat (×10−2 s−1) | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| Km (μm) | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 |
| Relative kcat/Km (%) | 100 | 6.7 |
a Results are shown as the average of three independent trials ± S.D.
Several aaRSs, such as LysRS (38) and MetRS (39), have N-extensions that are rich in basic residues and can bind nonspecifically tRNA elements. To determine if the ThrRS N-extension was similarly involved in tRNA binding, we measured the kd values of the two lethal mutants identified at position 52. The analysis showed that both ScThrRS-R52F and ScThrRS-R52D had full tRNA binding capacity (Table 4), indicating that this residue does not contribute significantly to tRNA binding. Altogether, the effects induced by R52A, R52D, and R52F strongly suggest that this part of the N-extension of ThrRS plays a critical role in catalysis, structure, and/or the stability of this enzyme.
The Yeast thrS Knock-out Strain as a Useful Tool to Analyze Mutations in Human Cytoplasmic ThrRS
Human cytoplasmic ThrRS comprises 723 amino acid residues and shows 53.8% sequence identity to ScThrRS. Here, 12 mutations were found in the two mutated ScThrRS libraries, and eight of the mutated residues were conserved in HsThrRS and ScThrRS (Fig. 1, A and C). This high homology between the two proteins allows HsThrRS to complement the yeast knock-out strain deprived of ScThrRS, ScΔthrS (21). We could use this complementation to test point mutations experimentally introduced into HsThrRS. An increasing number of point mutations causing various types of human diseases have been identified in aaRSs (40); therefore, the availability of a cellular system designed to test new mutations would be helpful.
To verify that the complementation assay of the thrS knock-out strain assay can be used with confidence to analyze mutated HsThrRS, we introduced the eight conserved missense mutations and one truncation in ScThrRS into HsThrRS. The eight mutations were single substitutions (R57F, S301F, G349N, G451D, R454H, G595E, P618L, and G677D) (Fig. 1, A and C), and the truncation was a deletion of the 11 residues of the C terminus (L711stop). Genes corresponding to these mutants were cloned into p425TEF(His) and introduced into ScΔthrS strain. All transformants grew well on SD/Leu−/Ura− plates, but none could grow in the SD/Leu− medium containing 5-FOA (Fig. 8A). The synthesis of the mutated proteins was confirmed by Western blot (Fig. 8B). Overall, the gene expression patterns of the HsThrRS mutants were very similar to those of the ScThrRS mutants (Figs. 2C and 8C). Some mutants, such as HsThrRS-G451D, -R454H, -G595E, and -G677D, were found in the same amounts as native HsThrRS, despite being lethal. However, mutants HsThrRS-R57F, -S301F, -G349N, -P618L, and -L711stop were present at about 5% of the relative amounts of either ScThrRS or HsThrRS, suggesting that these amino acid residues play similar functional and structural roles in both ThrRSs (Figs. 2C and 8C).
FIGURE 8.
Complementation of the yeast thrS knock-out strain by HsThrRS mutants. A, complementation of ScΔthrS strain by HsThrRS mutants corresponding to the ScThrRS lethal mutants. p425TEF(His) constructs harboring wild-type HsThrRS, -R57F, -S301F, -G349N, -G451D, -R454H, -G595E, -P618L, -G677D, and -L711stop were transformed into ScΔthrS. Equal amounts of cells of each transformant were dropped onto a SD/Leu−/5-FOA plate. Wild-type ScThrRS and empty p425TEF(His) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. B, Western blot showing the amounts of HsThrRS mutants. GAPDH was used as a control. C, quantification of the Western blot, normalized to the GAPDH control. The amount of HsThrRS was designated as 100%. Relative protein amounts were calculated based on at least two independent Western blot assays and shown parentheses with S.D. values omitted for clarity.
Considering that G145D, S457F, and C-Δ3 of ScThrRS were not lethal, we further confirmed whether the ScΔthrS strain could be used to test the function of HsThrRS mutations by introducing A149D, T450F, and C-Δ3 (corresponding to G145D, S457F, and C-Δ3 of ScThrRS, respectively) into HsThrRS. We found that yeast containing HsThrRS-C-Δ3 was growth-deficient and the other two mutations were lethal (data not shown). ScThrRS-C-Δ3 was viable (Fig. 6A), despite exhibiting a 2.4-fold loss of aminoacylation activity (Table 2), but cognate HsThrRS-C-Δ3 led to a significant deficiency in the growth of the ScΔthrS strain. These observations suggested that aminoacylation activities of HsThrRS mutants in vivo could be analyzed sensitively by the yeast thrS knock-out strain.
Overall, these initial results highlighted the strong correlation between sequence homology of the human and yeast cytoplasmic ThrRSs, and some critical functional and structural properties were observed in both enzymes. These data will be useful for future analyses of the potential pathological mechanism of identified mutations of HsThrRS in the future.
DISCUSSION
A Genetic Screen to Identify Functional Elements in ThrRS
ThrRS is a remarkable aaRS because it exhibits a specific modular structure in the class II synthetase family. It has also evolved a novel strategy of amino acid recognition and a proofreading activity (14). This prompted us to perform a genetic selection to isolate random mutations inducing the loss of ThrRS functions. To detect the loss of function, we used a genetic selection in S. cerevisiae based on the thrS gene knock-out strain. By plasmid shuffling, we isolated 12 mutations (11 and 1, respectively, from randomly and site-directed mutagenesis libraries) inducing lethal or growth-deficient phenotypes. The mutations are spread over the four main functional domains of ScThrRS. In addition, after carefully checking previous biochemical studies on ThrRS, we found that only Arg375 of EcThrRS (corresponding to our selected Arg461 of ScThrRS) has been studied by structural analyses (33). Arg461 of ScThrRS mutation was lethal in our study, which is consistent with the structural research. We provided the first evidence to show the functional significance of the other 11 residues of ScThrRS, including Arg52, Gly145, Ser308, Gly356, Ser457, Gly458, Gly604, Pro627, Gly685, Gln704, and Gln719.
Mutations in the Editing Site Simultaneously Affected the tRNA Proofreading and Aminoacylation
In the editing domain, mutations G145D and S308F induced a severe defect of editing activities. The crystal structure of EcThrRS shows that the two residues do not directly interact with the tRNA acceptor arm and CCA sequence into the editing site (14). Thus, an indirect effect would probably be responsible for the decrease of editing activity. Gly67 (Gly145 in ScThrRS) is located in helix H3 containing the signature sequence 73HXXXH77, which is involved in the hydrolytic process of mischarged tRNA (41). Therefore, the G145D mutation might have modified the flexibility and conformation of the catalytic helix H3, which might explain its loss of post-transfer editing. Similarly, Ala222 in EcThrRS, corresponding to Ser308 in yeast, is located before the α-helix bridging the editing and aminoacylation domains (14). The insertion of a bulky Phe residue in the S308F mutant might have modified the relative orientations of the two domains, with pleiotropic effects on synthetic, editing activities and mutant stability. Furthermore, G145D and S308F strongly decreased tRNA aminoacylation, despite being more than 30 Å from the synthetic site (14). The decrease of tRNA charging observed in the two mutants might also result from an inefficient editing activity. Actually, a full cycle of aminoacylation comprises the tRNA-charging step and, after translocation of the CCA acceptor end, the proofreading step in the editing site. Alteration of one step will definitely affect the rate of the next cycle, which might explain the parallel effect on tRNA charging and post-transfer editing.
Mutations in the Synthetic Active Site
Three mutations were isolated in the loop of class II-defining motif 2 and one in motif 3. According to the structural data, three of these mutations (S457F, G458D, and G604E) do not alter direct contacts with the substrates (14). However, the location of the residues and nature of the substitutions indicated that the damaging effects could have resulted from local structural changes resulting from steric hindrance with other side chains. It resulted in a loss of the synthetic activities, despite good protein stability. A fourth mutant, R461H, is remarkable in that it modifies an Arg residue that directly binds ATP during amino acid activation and then, after pyrophosphate departure, interacts with nucleotide C74 of tRNA during the transfer step (33). A conservative mutation was isolated during the screening procedure (R461H), confirming that this residue is critical and could not tolerate any change.
Lethal Mutations Also Target Dimerization of ThrRS
Class II aaRSs share three conserved motifs, one of which is involved in dimer formation (4, 42). Indeed, dimerization is essential for efficient formation of the active sites of AspRS (43), LysRS (44), and ProRS (45). However, dimerization is not strictly required for class II aaRS activity, and natural monomeric PheRSs exist in mitochondria (46). Similarly, a truncated monomeric E. coli AlaRS could complement in vivo in cells (47). ThrRS is a dimer with a typical class II interface between the two aminoacylation sites (14). Here, the analyses of G356N and P627L showed that dimerization is also a critical prerequisite for ScThrRS activity, as already observed with other class II synthetases. For the closely related LysRS, the dimeric character of LysRS was essential to stabilize the subunits in a productive conformation (44). The properties of the lethal mutants studied here fully support this view.
Binding of the Anticodon Controls tRNA Aminoacylation Activity
The C-terminal residues of aaRSs are sometimes essential for the enzymatic activity (48, 49). In E. coli tRNAThr, all of the bases from 32 to 37 interact through at least one hydrogen bond to the protein, and bases 35–38 are splayed out from the anticodon loop (14), indicating that the tRNA recognition cleft is a mobile region. This is consistent with the observation that almost identical Km values were determined for E. coli tRNAThr isoacceptors having C, G, or U at position 34 (37), despite only C34 directly binding to the enzyme and interacting with N575 (14). It is also interesting to note that a hydrogen bond was found between N2 of G35 and O4 of U36 (14). In addition, a highly conserved acidic residue Glu600 of EcThrRS lying adjacent to Gly597 (analogous to Gly685 of ScThrRS) makes a direct hydrogen bond with N1 of G35 (14). In brief, the conformational flexibility of the tRNA binding site, the novel base interaction between G35 and U36, and the mutation of Gly685 into acidic Asp might explain why the selected G685D lethal mutation did not affect the initial binding of tRNA to the synthetase, as shown by the kd measurement.
An N-terminal Appended Domain with Critical Residues
One distinct feature in the structural evolution of aaRSs is the appending of sequences at the amino or C terminus. These new domains are generally thought to be dispensable for aminoacylation but are responsible for a number of new noncanonical functions, such as multisynthetase complex formation, transcription regulation, translation control, and neurodegeneration (50). For example, in the multisynthetase complex, the C-terminal extension of LeuRS is dispensable for enzymatic activity but critical for the interaction with the N-terminal of ArgRS (32). Eukaryotic ThrRS has evolved an N-extension harboring several highly conserved residues, such as Arg52. We found that R52F and R52D mutations are lethal, inhibiting aminoacylation and reducing protein stability in vivo. Appended domains were reported to enhance tRNA binding through nonspecific tRNA binding interactions (51–53), and no critical residue has been described in these extensions. The Arg52 mutant of ScThrRS and the equivalent mutant in HsThrRS are the first examples of lethal mutants described in the N-extension that reduced both aminoacylation and editing properties. This shows that the appended domains can play key roles in regulating the enzymatic activities of the catalytic core.
Interestingly, ScThrRS-R52A could support the growth of the ScΔthrS strain with a 23-fold loss of aminoacylation activity plus 33-fold lower protein amount, as compared with the native enzyme. However, ScThrRS-G145D and -S457F, which caused less severe aminoacylation and expression defects, led to growth deficiency. Mutation of the residue Ser457 of the motif 2 loop into Phe probably impedes aminoacylation directly, because the motif 2 loop is crucial for the correct positioning of the tRNA acceptor end and amino acid binding (33). ScThrRS-G145D exhibited a severe decrease in post-transfer editing; its low enzymatic activity probably resulted from the impaired aminoacylation cycle of tRNA charging and proofreading. In contrast to the direct impact on tRNA charging and editing caused by S457F and G145D mutations, it seems that R52A indirectly weakened the catalytic efficiency through impairing protein stability or conformation/structure. The indirect influence of R52A mutation might be diminished in vivo in unidentified manners, such as assistance of chaperones, product release, or interaction with other translation factors. As a consequence, ScThrRS-R52A is more efficient in producing Thr-tRNAThr and is viable enough to complement the ScΔthrS strain.
Analyzing and Characterizing Human aaRS/tRNA Pathogenetic Mutations
Since the first example of human genetic disease-related mutation in an aaRS was reported in 2003, when GlyRS was implicated in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (10), an increasing number of aaRSs has been revealed to cause human diseases (40). We show that the high sequence conservation between HsThrRS and ScThrRS is suitable to perform complementation assays of the yeast ThrRS knock-out strain by HsThrRS or mutated derivatives. Loss of function mutations selected in yeast ThrRS and transplanted in human cytoplasmic ThrRS induce very similar defects, indicating that the yeast strain can be used to gain insights into the pathological mechanisms induced by human ThrRS mutations in the future, although no mutations have currently been linked pathologically with the human cytoplasmic ThrRS gene. Recently, a spontaneous mutation of human mitochondrial ThrRS P282L was reported to cause mitochondrial encephalopathies (54). The ThrRS knock-out system designed to test cellular function might also be helpful to examine the effects of this P282L mutation and establish an in vivo functional diagnosis.
Six different mutations in human mitochondrial tRNAThr (see the Compilation of Mammalian Mitochondrial tDNA Genes Web site, Université de Strasbourg) have been identified to induce human diseases, including mitochondrial myopathies, lethal infantile mitochondrial myopathy, Alzheimer and Parkinson disease, and Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Yeast was reported as a platform to understand the cellular role of human pathogenetic mitochondrial tRNAs, because mitochondrial tRNA sequence and function between yeast and humans are general conservative (55). For example, the A14G substitution of yeast mitochondrial tRNALeu(UUR) caused equivalent aminoacylation defects and structure alterations to the A3243G human pathogenetic tRNA mutation (56). A similar yeast tRNAThr knock-out system may be easily constructed and adapted to investigate in vivo the impact of tRNAThr mutations and also provide insights into the cellular mechanism of tRNA-associated mitochondrial diseases.
This work was supported by National Key Basic Research Foundation of China Grant 2012CB911000, Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 31130064, and Committee of Science and Technology in Shanghai Grant 12JC1409700.
- aaRS
- aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase
- EcThrRS
- ScThrRS, and HsThrRS, E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and H. sapiens threonyl-tRNA synthetase, respectively.
REFERENCES
- 1. Ibba M., Soll D. (2000) Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 617–650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rould M. A., Perona J. J., Söll D., Steitz T. A. (1989) Structure of E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase complexed with tRNAGln and ATP at 2.8 Å resolution. Science 246, 1135–1142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cusack S., Berthet-Colominas C., Härtlein M., Nassar N., Leberman R. (1990) A second class of synthetase structure revealed by x-ray analysis of Escherichia coli seryl-tRNA synthetase at 2.5 Å. Nature 347, 249–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Eriani G., Delarue M., Poch O., Gangloff J., Moras D. (1990) Partition of tRNA synthetases into two classes based on mutually exclusive sets of sequence motifs. Nature 347, 203–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chen J. F., Guo N. N., Li T., Wang E. D., Wang Y. L. (2000) CP1 domain in Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase is crucial for its editing function. Biochemistry 39, 6726–6731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ling J., Reynolds N., Ibba M. (2009) Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis and translational quality control. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 61–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhou X., Wang E. (2013) Transfer RNA: a dancer between charging and mis-charging for protein biosynthesis. Sci. China Life Sci. 56, 921–932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhou X. L., Du D. H., Tan M., Lei H. Y., Ruan L. L., Eriani G., Wang E. D. (2011) Role of tRNA amino acid-accepting end in aminoacylation and its quality control. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 8857–8868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Reynolds N. M., Ling J., Roy H., Banerjee R., Repasky S. E., Hamel P., Ibba M. (2010) Cell-specific differences in the requirements for translation quality control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 4063–4068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Antonellis A., Ellsworth R. E., Sambuughin N., Puls I., Abel A., Lee-Lin S. Q., Jordanova A., Kremensky I., Christodoulou K., Middleton L. T., Sivakumar K., Ionasescu V., Funalot B., Vance J. M., Goldfarb L. G., Fischbeck K. H., Green E. D. (2003) Glycyl tRNA synthetase mutations in Charcot-Marie- Tooth disease type 2D and distal spinal muscular atrophy type V. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 1293–1299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Banks G. T., Bros-Facer V., Williams H. P., Chia R., Achilli F., Bryson J. B., Greensmith L., Fisher E. M. (2009) Mutant glycyl-tRNA synthetase (Gars) ameliorates SOD1(G93A) motor neuron degeneration phenotype but has little affect on Loa dynein heavy chain mutant mice. PloS One 4, e6218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jordanova A., Irobi J., Thomas F. P., Van Dijck P., Meerschaert K., Dewil M., Dierick I., Jacobs A., De Vriendt E., Guergueltcheva V., Rao C. V., Tournev I., Gondim F. A., D'Hooghe M., Van Gerwen V., Callaerts P., Van Den Bosch L., Timmermans J. P., Robberecht W., Gettemans J., Thevelein J. M., De Jonghe P., Kremensky I., Timmerman V. (2006) Disrupted function and axonal distribution of mutant tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase in dominant intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. Nat. Genet. 38, 197–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lee J. W., Beebe K., Nangle L. A., Jang J., Longo-Guess C. M., Cook S. A., Davisson M. T., Sundberg J. P., Schimmel P., Ackerman S. L. (2006) Editing-defective tRNA synthetase causes protein misfolding and neurodegeneration. Nature 443, 50–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sankaranarayanan R., Dock-Bregeon A. C., Romby P., Caillet J., Springer M., Rees B., Ehresmann C., Ehresmann B., Moras D. (1999) The structure of threonyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNAThr complex enlightens its repressor activity and reveals an essential zinc ion in the active site. Cell 97, 371–381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ribas de Pouplana L., Schimmel P. (2001) Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: potential markers of genetic code development. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 591–596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sankaranarayanan R., Dock-Bregeon A. C., Rees B., Bovee M., Caillet J., Romby P., Francklyn C. S., Moras D. (2000) Zinc ion mediated amino acid discrimination by threonyl-tRNA synthetase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 461–465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Dock-Bregeon A., Sankaranarayanan R., Romby P., Caillet J., Springer M., Rees B., Francklyn C. S., Ehresmann C., Moras D. (2000) Transfer RNA-mediated editing in threonyl-tRNA synthetase: the class II solution to the double discrimination problem. Cell 103, 877–884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Beebe K., Merriman E., Ribas De Pouplana L., Schimmel P. (2004) A domain for editing by an archaebacterial tRNA synthetase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 5958–5963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Korencic D., Ahel I., Schelert J., Sacher M., Ruan B., Stathopoulos C., Blum P., Ibba M., Söll D. (2004) A freestanding proofreading domain is required for protein synthesis quality control in Archaea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 10260–10265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Shimizu S., Juan E. C., Sato Y., Miyashita Y., Hoque M. M., Suzuki K., Sagara T., Tsunoda M., Sekiguchi T., Dock-Bregeon A. C., Moras D., Takénaka A. (2009) Two complementary enzymes for threonylation of tRNA in crenarchaeota: crystal structure of Aeropyrum pernix threonyl-tRNA synthetase lacking a cis-editing domain. J. Mol. Biol. 394, 286–296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhou X. L., Ruan Z. R., Huang Q., Tan M., Wang E. D. (2013) Translational fidelity maintenance preventing Ser mis-incorporation at Thr codon in protein from eukaryote. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 302–314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Springer M., Graffe M., Dondon J., Grunberg-Manago M. (1989) tRNA-like structures and gene regulation at the translational level: a case of molecular mimicry in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 8, 2417–2424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Caillet J., Nogueira T., Masquida B., Winter F., Graffe M., Dock-Brégeon A. C., Torres-Larios A., Sankaranarayanan R., Westhof E., Ehresmann B., Ehresmann C., Romby P., Springer M. (2003) The modular structure of Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase as both an enzyme and a regulator of gene expression. Mol. Microbiol. 47, 961–974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ador L., Camasses A., Erbs P., Cavarelli J., Moras D., Gangloff J., Eriani G. (1999) Active site mapping of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase by in vivo selection of enzyme mutations lethal for cell growth. J. Mol. Biol. 288, 231–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mumberg D., Müller R., Funk M. (1995) Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene 156, 119–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rasila T. S., Pajunen M. I., Savilahti H. (2009) Critical evaluation of random mutagenesis by error-prone polymerase chain reaction protocols, Escherichia coli mutator strain, and hydroxylamine treatment. Anal. Biochem. 388, 71–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wong T. S., Roccatano D., Zacharias M., Schwaneberg U. (2006) A statistical analysis of random mutagenesis methods used for directed protein evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 858–871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Jazwinski S. M. (1990) Preparation of extracts from yeast. Methods Enzymol. 182, 154–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Gruic-Sovulj I., Uter N., Bullock T., Perona J. J. (2005) tRNA-dependent aminoacyl-adenylate hydrolysis by a nonediting class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 23978–23986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tan M., Zhu B., Zhou X. L., He R., Chen X., Eriani G., Wang E. D. (2010) tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing by prokaryotic leucyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 3235–3244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yarus M., Berg P. (1970) On the properties and utility of a membrane filter assay in the study of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Anal. Biochem. 35, 450–465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ling C., Yao Y. N., Zheng Y. G., Wei H., Wang L., Wu X. F., Wang E. D. (2005) The C-terminal appended domain of human cytosolic leucyl-tRNA synthetase is indispensable in its interaction with arginyl-tRNA synthetase in the multi-tRNA synthetase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 34755–34763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Torres-Larios A., Sankaranarayanan R., Rees B., Dock-Bregeon A. C., Moras D. (2003) Conformational movements and cooperativity upon amino acid, ATP and tRNA binding in threonyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Mol. Biol. 331, 201–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Cavarelli J., Eriani G., Rees B., Ruff M., Boeglin M., Mitschler A., Martin F., Gangloff J., Thierry J. C., Moras D. (1994) The active site of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase: structural and functional aspects of the aminoacylation reaction. EMBO J. 13, 327–337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Arnez J. G., Augustine J. G., Moras D., Francklyn C. S. (1997) The first step of aminoacylation at the atomic level in histidyl-tRNA synthetase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 7144–7149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Eriani G., Cavarelli J., Martin F., Ador L., Rees B., Thierry J. C., Gangloff J., Moras D. (1995) The class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and their active site: evolutionary conservation of an ATP binding site. J. Mol. Evol. 40, 499–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hasegawa T., Miyano M., Himeno H., Sano Y., Kimura K., Shimizu M. (1992) Identity determinants of E. coli threonine tRNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 184, 478–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Francin M., Kaminska M., Kerjan P., Mirande M. (2002) The N-terminal domain of mammalian lysyl-tRNA synthetase is a functional tRNA-binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 1762–1769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kaminska M., Shalak V., Mirande M. (2001) The appended C-domain of human methionyl-tRNA synthetase has a tRNA-sequestering function. Biochemistry 40, 14309–14316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Antonellis A., Green E. D. (2008) The role of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in genetic diseases. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9, 87–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Dock-Bregeon A. C., Rees B., Torres-Larios A., Bey G., Caillet J., Moras D. (2004) Achieving error-free translation; the mechanism of proofreading of threonyl-tRNA synthetase at atomic resolution. Mol. Cell 16, 375–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Arnez J. G., Moras D. (1997) Structural and functional considerations of the aminoacylation reaction. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 211–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Eriani G., Cavarelli J., Martin F., Dirheimer G., Moras D., Gangloff J. (1993) Role of dimerization in yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase and importance of the class II invariant proline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 10816–10820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Commans S., Blanquet S., Plateau P. (1995) A single substitution in the motif 1 of Escherichia coli lysyl-tRNA synthetase induces cooperativity toward amino acid binding. Biochemistry 34, 8180–8189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lee M. L., Muench K. H. (1969) Prolyl transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 244, 223–230 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sanni A., Walter P., Boulanger Y., Ebel J. P., Fasiolo F. (1991) Evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase quaternary structure and activity: Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 8387–8391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Jasin M., Regan L., Schimmel P. (1983) Modular arrangement of functional domains along the sequence of an aminoacyl tRNA synthetase. Nature 306, 441–447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Hsu J. L., Rho S. B., Vannella K. M., Martinis S. A. (2006) Functional divergence of a unique C-terminal domain of leucyl-tRNA synthetase to accommodate its splicing and aminoacylation roles. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 23075–23082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hu Q. H., Huang Q., Wang E. D. (2013) Crucial role of the C-terminal domain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis leucyl-tRNA synthetase in aminoacylation and editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 1859–1872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Guo M., Yang X. L., Schimmel P. (2010) New functions of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases beyond translation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 668–674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Frugier M., Moulinier L., Giegé R. (2000) A domain in the N-terminal extension of class IIb eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is important for tRNA binding. EMBO J. 19, 2371–2380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Cahuzac B., Berthonneau E., Birlirakis N., Guittet E., Mirande M. (2000) A recurrent RNA-binding domain is appended to eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. EMBO J. 19, 445–452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wang C. C., Schimmel P. (1999) Species barrier to RNA recognition overcome with nonspecific RNA binding domains. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16508–16512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Diodato D., Melchionda L., Haack T. B., Dallabona C., Baruffini E., Donnini C., Granata T., Ragona F., Balestri P., Margollicci M., Lamantea E., Nasca A., Powell C. A., Minczuk M., Strom T. M., Meitinger T., Prokisch H., Lamperti C., Zeviani M., Ghezzi D. (2014) VARS2 and TARS2 mutations in patients with mitochondrial encephalomyopathies. Hum. Mutat. 35, 983–989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Rinaldi T., Dallabona C., Ferrero I., Frontali L., Bolotin-Fukuhara M. (2010) Mitochondrial diseases and the role of the yeast models. FEMS Yeast Res. 10, 1006–1022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Montanari A., Besagni C., De Luca C., Morea V., Oliva R., Tramontano A., Bolotin-Fukuhara M., Frontali L., Francisci S. (2008) Yeast as a model of human mitochondrial tRNA base substitutions: investigation of the molecular basis of respiratory defects. RNA 14, 275–283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





