Abstract
Lung function tracks from the earliest age that it can be reliably measured. Genome wide association studies (GWAS) suggest that most variants identified for common complex traits are both regulatory in function and active during fetal development. Fetal programming of gene expression during development is critical to the formation of a normal lung. An understanding of how fetal developmental genes related to diseases of the lungs and airways is a critical area for research. This review article will consider the developmental origins hypothesis, the stages of normal lung development and a variety of environmental exposures that might influence the developmental process: in utero cigarette smoke exposure, vitamin D and Folate. We conclude with some information on developmental genes and asthma.
Keywords: Genomics, Asthma, Fetal Lung Development
Introduction
In this review we will consider several areas where environmental exposures, genomics, development, and asthma occurrence overlap. We will first consider the developmental origins of disease hypothesis, and then we will cover the anatomic stages of normal fetal lung development and resources developed to understand the genomic origins of asthma. We will then consider the transcriptomic profile of human lung development, in utero cigarette smoke exposure and its effects on fetal lung development and asthma, expression quantitative trait loci identification, the effects of folate and vitamin D on fetal lung development and asthma and finish with some conclusions and next steps.
Developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis
The developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) hypothesis suggests that exposures during early life from conception into early childhood can have an influence on an individual’s health and disease risk in adult life.(1) Although the initial hypothesis as proposed by Barker related coronary artery disease to fetal under-nutrition, it has now been applied to a variety of diseases including the development of childhood asthma. The first evidence of in utero factors influencing long-term disease risk came from a large study demonstrating the association between an increased risk of coronary artery disease with low birth weight.(2) Three factors: 1) fewer cells in key organs, 2) a “thrifty” way of handling food, and 3) a higher vulnerability were believed to explain the higher disease incidence in low birth-weight babies.(3) These findings are thought to be a result of developmental plasticity, which is defined as the ability of one genotype to give rise to a number of different phenotypes in response to environmental exposures that occur during development.(3, 4) It is now known that a number of additional environmental factors can play a role in the in utero programming of fetal development including lung development, which subsequently increases disease susceptibility in both childhood and adulthood. Since gene expression changes that result from both intrauterine environmental exposures and epigenetics are a potential explanation for the DOHaD hypothesis,(5) genomic technologies are now being applied in the context of development in order to understand the mechanisms underlying the fetal origins of disease. In this review we examine the existing evidence for the genomics of lung development and the fetal origins of asthma.
Human Fetal Lung Development
Human lung development starts at approximately the fourth week of gestation and continues into the post-natal period. The developing human fetal lung can be classified into 6 temporally overlapping successive stages based on gross morphologic changes and histologic appearance: embryonic (4-7 weeks), pseudoglandular (7-17 weeks), canalicular (17-26 weeks), saccular (27-36 weeks), and alveolar (36 weeks-2 years)(Figure 1).(6) Although the exact timing of the transitions between histologic stages is variable in the existing literature, the sequence of the stages is universally agreed upon. Branching morphogenesis, which is the genetically programmed process of airway development, occurs during the pseudoglandular and canalicular stages of development. Unlike in the mouse in whom alveolar development occurs exclusively in the post-natal period, alveolar development in the human commences at approximately 36 weeks post conception and is only complete in adolescence. Airway growth, also, continues throughout the post-natal period, and into adolescence.
Resources developed to understand the genomic origins of asthma
High throughput genomic technologies are being used with increasing frequency in the study of complex diseases. The use of these resources in the context of development biology, however, is still in its infancy. Resources that can help us better understand the changes that alter the course of lung development include tissue specific gene expression, genotype, epigenetics, proteomics, metabolomics, and other data spanning the developmental timeline. By applying high throughput genomic methodologies including genotype, gene expression, and DNA methylation, to fetal lung and placental tissue that was obtained through a collaborative research effort, we hope to further elucidate the genomic trajectories of human lung development. To add to this is the availability of genotype and gene expression data from asthmatic subjects in large population cohorts of asthmatic subjects such as the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP). The NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) also has a large number of asthma related data sets which have been obtained from tissues such as bronchial biopsies, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, cultured airway smooth muscle cells, etc. and can allow researchers to perform integrative bioinformatics analyses. Murine data further adds to our understanding of both development and disease allowing researchers to fill in missing developmental time points and to verify genomic targets. Murine models of asthma as well as in utero exposures have been useful in understanding mechanisms and have allowed time series analyses, which are not possible in human subjects.
The transcriptomic profile of human lung development
Human fetal lung development results from a complex interacting system of genetic, mechanical, and molecular processes, which are unlikely to be captured by the traditional histologic stage alone. Furthermore, the biologic mechanisms underlying lung development have not been completely characterized.(7-9) Several studies have investigated the gene expression profile of the developing mouse lung.(10-13) These models have begun to define the complex regulation of gene expression that occurs during lung development and have provided insight into the molecular determinants of normal lung development. In spite of the advances made in our understanding of lung development that have resulted from murine models of development, there remains a paucity of data regarding the gene expression profile of lung development in the human. Using genome-wide gene expression profiles from 38 human fetal lung tissue samples from post-conception ages 53-154 days, we have previously identified global patterns of gene expression in human lung development.(14) Interestingly, principal components analysis (PCA) of human fetal lung tissue gene expression identified a molecular transition phase that was independent of histologic stage,(14) demonstrating the promise of the application of genomic technologies to developmental biology to elucidate novel biology (Figure 2).
Supervised data analysis strategies explicitly use a priori knowledge or assumptions about the system in addition to the given (expression) data itself. For example, [1] determining genes that are differentially expressed between pseudoglandular and canalicular stages requires the respective time intervals for these stages as computational input variables/parameters, [2] identifying genes that have a specific expression profile requires a hypothetical profile template against which all genes are compared (with no guarantee that a gene exists in the system possessing that hypothetical profile), and [3] investigating the expression profile of genes involved in branching morphogenesis requires knowledge of gene attributes from biological knowledge repositories such as PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/), the Gene Ontology Consortium (http://www.geneontology.org/), or KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/).
In contrast, unsupervised data analysis strategies use the given data as their sole input variables/parameters. This data is typically represented as an algebraic matrix of N genes by M sample time points with real number entries representing the measured expression of a specific gene for a particular sample. For example, identifying the direction and magnitude of variance between the M samples in N-dimensional gene (transcriptome) space is a mathematical operation purely involving N subjects in M object feature space, with no knowledge of individual sample or gene biology, which is the case when one employs linear algebraic singular value decomposition-based methods such as principal component analysis (PCA).(15, 16) We have used PCA to identify the dominant transcriptome-scale sample variations between developing lung time points and found that these variations (called principal components) correlate with morphologic/physiologic events in the developing lung such as developmental age, time-to-birth and the transition between the classical developmental stages.(13, 14) Interestingly, this more agnostic analysis strategy revealed that aside from a large scale transcriptomic phase transition around days 110 to 117 post conception that coincides with the transition between the pseudoglandular and canalicular stages, the pseudoglandular stage time interval contained an earlier large-scale transcriptomic phase transition at around days 91 to 96 post conception. This phase transition corresponded to a sharp increased in the expression of genes with immunological MHC class II and surfactant function ontologies. In addition, this approach helped to define what we call a developing lung characteristic gene set (abbreviated DLCGS) using genes that were the top 5% contributors in the 3 most dominant principal components. The DLCGS from different developing lung transcriptome datasets were found to be significantly enriched for known ontologies related to lung morphogenesis, structure and function further validating this approach.
One obvious way to investigate a genetic connection between development and (chronic, non-cancer) disease is to perturb a candidate disease gene in a cognate developmental model (e.g., cell culture or animal) and to look for any associated phenotypes. Vice versa, one can investigate a known development-critical gene for any perturbations in a relevant disease-control subject population. Besides being single molecule or gene-centric, the limitations of cell culture or animal models of human disease are well known.(17) Candidate disease genes and genetic loci can be obtained from a variety of sources but one recent development is the use of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for this purpose.
Association of lung development genes with asthma and lung function in asthmatic populations
The application of genomic technologies to development has allowed us to start to identify the biologic mechanisms underlying the fetal origins of complex diseases like asthma. Using genome-wide gene expression profiles from human fetal lung tissue samples from the pseudoglandular and canalicular stages of human lung development, we identified genes in the Wnt-signaling pathway that were differentially expressed by histologic stage and that harbor genetic variants that are associated with impaired lung function in two childhood asthma cohorts.(18) In addition, using genome-wide gene expression profiles of both human and mouse lung development, we also demonstrated differential expression of several asthma genes previously identified in genome-wide associations studies (GWAS) of asthma, including: ROBO1, RORA, HLA-DQB1, IL2RB and PDE10A.(19) Furthermore, there was a trend towards over-representation of known asthma genes among genes differentially expressed during both human and mouse lung development.(19) These results suggest that gene expression profiling during lung development can be used to identify genes implicated in the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases like asthma and may be used to elucidate the molecular underpinnings of this complex respiratory disease. In addition this approach demonstrates the pleiotropy of human genes where genes that are involved in critical developmental steps are also involved in disease pathogenesis.
Alternatively, one can apply a less gene-centric, more meta-analytic and bioinformatics based approach by investigating overlaps between sets of genes (or genetic loci) implicated in specific disease and developmental contexts in order to infer development-disease connections and prioritize genes for further functional validation. We previously studied overlaps between the set of all asthma susceptibility genes reported in PubMed relative to different developing lung time series transcriptome data (DLCGS).(19) While the overlaps were not all significant, the odds ratios showed a consistently >1.0, and a common set of genes showed up in asthma-development set intersections.
The Role of IUS in Fetal Lung Development Genomics and the Development of Asthma
There is substantial evidence to suggest that in utero smoke exposure (IUS) results in chronic respiratory disease in the post-natal period. IUS exposure has been associated with reduced lung function and lower respiratory system compliance at birth.(20-22) Interestingly, airflow obstruction that results from IUS exposure persists into early childhood and beyond.(23-26) Furthermore, IUS has been associated with the risk of recurrent wheeze(27) and incident asthma in school age children(26, 28, 29) and has been associated with asthma during adulthood.(30, 31) In addition, in children with asthma IUS exposure results in decreased lung function(32) and a reduced response to inhaled corticosteroids on airway responsiveness.(33) Several proposed mechanisms that explain the association of IUS with asthma susceptibility include direct injury to the fetus that results from IUS exposure, alterations of gene expression, or gene-by-environment interactions that result from IUS exposure. However, the biologic mechanisms underlying the association of IUS and asthma susceptibility are unclear.
Animal studies demonstrate that IUS results in structural effects on the developing lung(34) and decreased fetal lung growth.(35) Data from non-human primate studies of IUS suggest that IUS exposure increases airway wall dimensions and alterations in lung mechanics.(36) In humans, fetuses exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy have notable hyperplasia of the pulmonary neuroendocrine cells.(37)
To date, the vast majority of what we know about the effect of IUS on gene expression is a result of animal models. Data from non-human primate studies suggest that IUS exposure increases collagen type I and III deposition in both airway and alveolar walls.(36) Mouse models of IUS demonstrate the nicotine exposure during early development results in increased surfactant proteins A and C expression resulting in increased branching morphogenesis.(38) Mouse models of IUS have also demonstrated significant differential expression of 80 transcripts in the lung of adult mice exposed to IUS including genes involved in immune response, cell proliferation, and apoptosis.(39) Furthermore, several of the genes that were differentially expressed in the lung of mice exposed to IUS included genes that have been recognized to induce lung inflammation including arginase 1 (Arg1) and genes in the chitinase family.(39)
In human subjects, the data on the effect of IUS on genetics and genomics is less certain. Children who were exposed to IUS and were homozygous for the Arg16 allele of the β2-adrenergic receptor had a threefold increased risk of lifetime wheeze compared to non-exposed subjects.(40) These results suggest that environmental exposures including IUS must be considered when evaluating the effect certain genotype on respiratory health outcomes.(40)
In order to assess the effects of IUS on human fetal lung development, we along with our collaborators have determined that placental cotinine, a nicotine metabolite, can be used to classify fetal tissues by their IUS exposure status.(41) We identified that an optimal cut point of 7.5 ng/g of placental cotinine had a sensitivity = 78.7% and specificity = 100% to classify placenta samples from mothers who smoked versus those from mothers who did not(Figure 3).(41) Using placental cotinine values as a surrogate for IUS exposure, we next demonstrated that the expression of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes (CYP1A1 and CYP1B1) were significantly induced by IUS in human fetal lung tissue.(41) Using genome-wide gene expression profiles on human fetal lung tissue samples (post-conception age: 53-137 days) with measured placental cotinine values as a biomarker of IUS exposure, we have performed a differential gene expression analysis between IUS exposed (n=104) and unexposed (n=104) fetal lung tissue. We identified 154 genes that were differentially expressed between IUS exposed and unexposed subjects (adjusted p<0.05). Interestingly, several microRNAs showed the highest correlation with the IUS exposure (p= 2 × 10−4) (unpublished data). These results suggest that altered gene expression that results from IUS exposure during lung development may be the biologic basis for the association of IUS with asthma, however, further investigation of this data is currently underway.
Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) Mapping in Development
Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping seeks to identify genetic polymorphisms that influence gene expression levels and has been used in a variety of disease contexts. Recently, Francesconi and colleagues performed eQTL mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans to identify how genetic polymorphisms influence dynamic gene expression patterns that occur during development.(42) They demonstrated that by incorporating dynamic variation they were able to identify >50% more eQTLs, and that genetic polymorphisms extensively affect the timing, rate, magnitude, and shape of gene expression changes during development.(42) This analytic approach has yet to be performed in lung development and warrants further evaluation in this context.
Using an integrative genomic approach in human fetal lung development, we are starting to identify genetic variants that influence in utero gene expression that subsequently contribute to asthma susceptibility. We screened for cis-acting single nucleotide polymorphism (cis-eQTL) by testing variants mapping within 50 kb of expressed transcripts for association with transcript abundance using generalized linear models adjusted using principal components. We identified genetic variation influencing in utero gene expression of 592 genes in the human fetal lung. Of the significant cis-eQTLs identified, 39 were associated with lung function in asthmatic subjects participating in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (unpublished data). The T allele of the most significant cis-eQTL (rs2392246) was associated with increased BBS9 expression and a lower forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (p=0.0006) in asthmatic subjects. Interestingly, BBS9 is a protein complex required for ciliogenesis. Although preliminary in nature, our results suggest that mapping of regulatory genetic variation in human fetal lung tissue is a powerful method for identifying genes that influence impaired lung function in asthmatic subjects. Integrative genetic approaches in human fetal lung development can help identify such variation and enhance our understanding of the genetic basis of lung function impairment. Furthermore, these results provide further evidence for the fetal origin of impaired lung function.
The Role of Folic Acid in the Development of Asthma
Folate is part of the water-soluble B complex family of vitamins and includes both the natural form and the fully oxidized monoglutamate form used in dietary supplements.(43) It plays a role as a methyl donor for S-adenosylmethionine(44) and may thus influence DNA methylation. Methylation is also required for the synthesis of dTMP from dUMP thereby preventing the incorporation of uracil in DNA and preventing point mutations, single and double stranded DNA breaks, chromosome breakage and micronucleus formation.(45) Peri-conceptional folic acid supplementation has been shown to prevent neural tube defects (46, 47) and the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) recommends that all pregnant women should receive 400 μg of folic acid daily. Studies assessing the relation of maternal folate intake and DNA methylation in the humans have yielded conflicting results.(48, 49) Recently there has been a growing interest in the relationship between maternal folate supplementation and the development of asthma in the offspring based on animal studies, whereby supplementation with methyl donors during pregnancy was associated with the development and severity of reactive airway disease in the offspring.(50) However, as concluded by a recent review and meta-analyses there is not enough evidence to support the association of peri-conceptional folate intake and development of asthma in the offspring at this time.(51)
The Role of Vitamin D in Fetal Lung Development Genomics
The role of vitamin D in fetal lung development and its association with asthma has been investigated clinically as well as through cellular and animal models. The combined evidence suggests that vitamin D plays an important role in utero that is related to future risk of asthma.
The association of low maternal vitamin D on later development of childhood wheezing and asthma has been examined in multiple birth cohort epidemiologic studies. In a Scottish birth cohort of 1,212 individuals, there was an increased risk for childhood wheezing at 5 years that was inversely associated with maternal vitamin D intake during pregnancy.(52) Camargo et al. followed a Massachusetts pre-birth cohort of 1194 children in Project Viva and found that higher maternal vitamin D intake during pregnancy was associated with a lower rate of recurrent wheeze in children at 3 years.(53) In a Japanese cohort of 763 mother-child pairs, a threshold effect was found, where children of mothers who consumed 4.309 mg or more of vitamin D per day during pregnancy had a significantly reduced risk of wheeze at 16-24 month follow-up.(54) More recently a prospective study in 44,825 Danish mother-child pairs in the longitudinal Danish National Birth Cohort examined vitamin D intake in mid-pregnancy, finding a weak inverse relationship between high total vitamin D and asthma at 7 years, without data to suggest a threshold of vitamin D intake that was associated with reduced risk.(55)
Cord blood was examined as part of a prospective birth cohort of 922 from New Zealand, revealing that low levels of cord-blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D were associated with an increased risk of childhood wheezing at five years, but not the incidence of asthma.(56) Conversely, a birth cohort of 178 followed in the United Kingdom reportedly demonstrated that elevated maternal blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the third trimester was associated with an increased likelihood of asthma at 9 years, though notably the response rate was only 30% and confounders were not fully adjusted for.(57, 58)
A systematic review and pooled meta-analysis examined many of these studies and found that higher maternal vitamin D intake was associated with reduced odds of wheezing (OR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.42-0.73; P < .001). This pooled analysis did not show an association with increased risk of asthma.(59)
Newer studies have tested these results. Goldring et al. performed a randomized trial following the offspring of 158 pregnant women in the United Kingdom.(60) They found that vitamin D supplementation in the third trimester had a modest effect on cord blood vitamin D levels but no association with decreased wheezing or lung function measured by impulse oscillometry in offspring at three years of age.(60) An ongoing randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy will provide further insight into the relationship between maternal vitamin D intake and development of asthma in children (Randomized trial: maternal vitamin D supplementation to prevent childhood asthma (VDAART). ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00920621).
Fetal and animal studies have further explored the mechanism behind this clinical association. There is evidence that vitamin D plays an important role in the regulation of fetal lung growth and development.(61-63) Gaultier et al. showed that rachitic rat pups born to vitamin D deficient mothers had normal lung weights but decreased lung compliance consistent with abnormal alveolar development.(64) Edelson et al. demonstrated that vitamin D3 is a growth factor for alveolar type-II cells, and suggested that vitamin D may be involved in local control of epithelial proliferation related to lung development.(63)
Receptors for 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D have been characterized in fetal alveolar epithelial cells, and it has been shown that fetal lungs decrease glycogen content and increase surfactant synthesis and secretion after exposure to 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D.(65-67) Vitamin D acts as a mediator of epithelial-mesenchymal cell interactions. In fetal rat lung there is a paracrine system that is activated during the last 3 days of pregnancy promoting lung fibroblasts to produce 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3. Type II pneumocytes have vitamin D receptors (VDRs) that respond to 1,25-(OH)2D3 by increasing surfactant synthesis/secretion and reducing glycogen content.(61, 62, 68) Sakurai et al. investigated the important role vitamin D plays in modulating lipofibroblasts during lung development. They propose a model for the alveolar vitamin D paracrine system and suggest a mechanism for the increased surfactant synthesis and resultant alveolar septal thinning during perinatal lung maturation.(69)
It has been demonstrated that poor lung development is a risk factor for asthma in childhood.(70) Zosky et al. showed a mouse model of in utero vitamin D deficiency where offspring from vitamin D-deficient mothers had impaired lung volume and corresponding deficits in lung function that could not be explained by the decreased lung volume alone.(71) This provides evidence for a potential mechanism for the association between gestational vitamin D deficiency and the development of future obstructive lung disease.(71) Follow-up work by this group demonstrated that in utero vitamin D deficiency suppressed the proliferation of airway-draining lymph node cells and their ability to secrete T helper cell type-2 cytokines such as IL-3 and IL-5 in both male and female mice. Additionally, male offspring with vitamin D deficiency from the point of conception had enhanced numbers of eosinophils and neutrophils on bronchoalveolar lavage, an effect that was reversible with post-natal supplementation. In this study it was not possible to distinguish the effects of maternal vitamin D status versus the role of the vitamin D status of the individual after birth on lung development.(72)
A recent publication by our group further explored the mechanisms for explaining the association of vitamin D, lung development and asthma.(73) Previously we investigated the overlap between genes related to vitamin D relative to different developing lung time series transcriptome data (DLCGS) in order to infer the role of in utero changes of vitamin D responsive genes in both the developing lung and asthma.(73) We found the set of vitamin D related genes to be significantly over-represented in DLGCS from independent mouse and human lung development studies, with 38 such genes in both developmental systems. 12/38 (31.6%) were found to be differentially expressed in immortalized B-cells derived from 95 asthmatics relative to their unaffected siblings.(74)
Conclusions-Next steps
In summary we have shown that the original hypothesis developed by David Barker that fetal development is an important influence on the development of adult disease also extends to childhood asthma. Clearly lung function growth trajectories differ among subjects at 5 years of age, the time in life it can first be measured accurately (Figure 4). These differences in developmental trajectories are the result of a complex interaction between environmental factors (IUS, maternal diet, Folate, vitamin D, and other nutrients, mechanical forces, and the large number of genes interacting to build a lung during the developmental process. One of the most important implications of genome wide association studies (GWAS) has been that most of the identified variants associated with common complex diseases are regulatory in function and are active in fetal development making pleiotropy a critical factor in human complex traits.(75) The most important next steps in this research will be to expand our genomic technologies using RNA-sequencing on single cell types in development to look at cell-cell interactions, to interrogate a broader range of prenatal human developmental time points, and to develop gene networks to look at the interaction of genes on the different stages of development and how those gene networks are perturbed in disease.
Acknowledgments
Funding: R01 HL097144, R21 HL107927, K08 HL096833, K25 HL091124, T32 HL007427
This manuscript is subject to the NIH public access policy
Footnotes
Competing Interests: None
References
- 1.DOHaD International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease [cited 2014 January 15] Available from: http://www.mrc-leu.soton.ac.uk/dohad/index.asp.
- 2.Barker DJ, Winter PD, Osmond C, et al. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet. 1989 Sep 9;2(8663):577–80. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90710-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barker DJ. The developmental origins of well-being. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 29;359(1449):1359–66. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barker DJ. Developmental origins of adult health and disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Feb;58(2):114–5. doi: 10.1136/jech.58.2.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cutfield WS, Hofman PL, Mitchell M, et al. Could epigenetics play a role in the developmental origins of health and disease? Pediatric research. 2007 May;61(5):68R–75R. doi: 10.1203/pdr.0b013e318045764c. Pt 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schittny J, Burri P. Development and growth of the lung. (4th) 2008 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maeda Y, Dave V, Whitsett JA. Transcriptional control of lung morphogenesis. Physiol Rev. 2007 Jan;87(1):219–44. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morrisey EE, Cardoso WV, Lane RH, et al. Molecular determinants of lung development. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Apr;10(2):S12–6. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201207-036OT. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Warburton D, El-Hashash A, Carraro G, et al. Lung organogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2010;90:73–158. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(10)90003-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mariani TJ, Reed JJ, Shapiro SD. Expression profiling of the developing mouse lung: insights into the establishment of the extracellular matrix. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002 May;26(5):541–8. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.5.2001-00080c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bonner AE, Lemon WJ, You M. Gene expression signatures identify novel regulatory pathways during murine lung development: implications for lung tumorigenesis. J Med Genet. 2003 Jun;40(6):408–17. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.6.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dong J, Jiang G, Asmann YW, et al. MicroRNA networks in mouse lung organogenesis. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kho AT, Bhattacharya S, Mecham BH, et al. Expression profiles of the mouse lung identify a molecular signature of time-to-birth. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2009 Jan;40(1):47–57. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0048OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kho AT, Bhattacharya S, Tantisira KG, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of human lung development. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2010 Jan 1;181(1):54–63. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200907-1063OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alter O, Brown PO, Botstein D. Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing and modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 29;97(18):10101–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.18.10101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Misra J, Schmitt W, Hwang D, et al. Interactive exploration of microarray gene expression patterns in a reduced dimensional space. Genome Res. 2002 Jul;12(7):1112–20. doi: 10.1101/gr.225302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Edwards SL, Beesley J, French JD, et al. Beyond GWASs: Illuminating the Dark Road from Association to Function. Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Nov 7;93(5):779–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharma S, Tantisira K, Carey V, et al. A role for Wnt signaling genes in the pathogenesis of impaired lung function in asthma. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2010 Feb 15;181(4):328–36. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200907-1009OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Melen E, Kho AT, Sharma S, et al. Expression analysis of asthma candidate genes during human and murine lung development. Respiratory research. 2011;12:86. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hanrahan JP, Tager IB, Segal MR, et al. The effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on early infant lung function. The American review of respiratory disease. 1992 May;145(5):1129–35. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stick SM, Burton PR, Gurrin L, et al. Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy and a family history of asthma on respiratory function in newborn infants. Lancet. 1996 Oct 19;348(9034):1060–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)04446-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lodrup Carlsen KC, Jaakkola JJ, Nafstad P, et al. In utero exposure to cigarette smoking influences lung function at birth. The European respiratory journal. 1997 Aug;10(8):1774–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10081774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cunningham J, Dockery DW, Speizer FE. Maternal smoking during pregnancy as a predictor of lung function in children. American journal of epidemiology. 1994 Jun 15;139(12):1139–52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li YF, Gilliland FD, Berhane K, et al. Effects of in utero and environmental tobacco smoke exposure on lung function in boys and girls with and without asthma. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2000 Dec;162(6):2097–104. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.6.2004178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gilliland FD, Berhane K, McConnell R, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy, environmental tobacco smoke exposure and childhood lung function. Thorax. 2000 Apr;55(4):271–6. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.4.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moshammer H, Hoek G, Luttmann-Gibson H, et al. Parental smoking and lung function in children: an international study. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2006 Jun 1;173(11):1255–63. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200510-1552OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lannero E, Wickman M, Pershagen G, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of recurrent wheezing during the first years of life (BAMSE) Respiratory research. 2006;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gilliland FD, Li YF, Peters JM. Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy and environmental tobacco smoke on asthma and wheezing in children. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2001 Feb;163(2):429–36. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.2006009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pattenden S, Antova T, Neuberger M, et al. Parental smoking and children's respiratory health: independent effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure. Tobacco control. 2006 Aug;15(4):294–301. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.015065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Skorge TD, Eagan TM, Eide GE, et al. Indoor exposures and respiratory symptoms in a Norwegian community sample. Thorax. 2005 Nov;60(11):937–42. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.025973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Skorge TD, Eagan TM, Eide GE, et al. The adult incidence of asthma and respiratory symptoms by passive smoking in uterus or in childhood. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2005 Jul 1;172(1):61–6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1158OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gilliland FD, Berhane K, Li YF, et al. Effects of early onset asthma and in utero exposure to maternal smoking on childhood lung function. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2003 Mar 15;167(6):917–24. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200206-616OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cohen RT, Raby BA, Van Steen K, et al. In utero smoke exposure and impaired response to inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2010 Sep;126(3):491–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fu XW, Wood K, Spindel ER. Prenatal nicotine exposure increases GABA signaling and mucin expression in airway epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011 Feb;44(2):222–9. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0109OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Collins MH, Moessinger AC, Kleinerman J, et al. Fetal lung hypoplasia associated with maternal smoking: a morphometric analysis. Pediatric research. 1985 Apr;19(4):408–12. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198519040-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sekhon HS, Keller JA, Proskocil BJ, et al. Maternal nicotine exposure upregulates collagen gene expression in fetal monkey lung. Association with alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002 Jan;26(1):31–41. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.1.4170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen MF, Kimizuka G, Wang NS. Human fetal lung changes associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy. Pediatric pulmonology. 1987 Jan-Feb;3(1):51–8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950030113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wuenschell CW, Zhao J, Tefft JD, et al. Nicotine stimulates branching and expression of SP-A and SP-C mRNAs in embryonic mouse lung culture. The American journal of physiology. 1998 Jan;274(1):L165–70. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.274.1.L165. Pt 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rouse RL, Boudreaux MJ, Penn AL. In utero environmental tobacco smoke exposure alters gene expression in lungs of adult BALB/c mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Dec;115(12):1757–66. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang C, Salam MT, Islam T, et al. Effects of in utero and childhood tobacco smoke exposure and beta2-adrenergic receptor genotype on childhood asthma and wheezing. Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e107–14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vyhlidal CA, Riffel AK, Haley KJ, et al. Cotinine in human placenta predicts induction of gene expression in fetal tissues. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013 Feb;41(2):305–11. doi: 10.1124/dmd.112.049999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Francesconi M, Lehner B. The effects of genetic variation on gene expression dynamics during development. Nature. 2013 Nov;:24. doi: 10.1038/nature12772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Office of Dietary Supplements NIH hoongfF-H. Dietary Fact Sheet: Vitamin B6. 2011 [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shinton NK. Vitamin B 12 and folate metabolism. British medical journal. 1972 Feb 26;1(5799):556–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5799.556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fenech M. Folate (vitamin B9) and vitamin B12 and their function in the maintenance of nuclear and mitochondrial genome integrity. Mutation research. 2012 May 1;733(1-2):21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.De-Regil LM, Fernandez-Gaxiola AC, Dowswell T, et al. Effects and safety of periconceptional folate supplementation for preventing birth defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD007950. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007950.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Blencowe H, Cousens S, Modell B, et al. Folic acid to reduce neonatal mortality from neural tube disorders. International journal of epidemiology. 2010 Apr;39(Suppl 1):i110–21. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Haggarty P, Hoad G, Campbell DM, et al. Folate in pregnancy and imprinted gene and repeat element methylation in the offspring. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jan;97(1):94–9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.042572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Boeke CE, Baccarelli A, Kleinman KP, et al. Gestational intake of methyl donors and global LINE-1 DNA methylation in maternal and cord blood: prospective results from a folate-replete population. Epigenetics : official journal of the DNA Methylation Society. 2012 Mar;7(3):253–60. doi: 10.4161/epi.7.3.19082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hollingsworth JW, Maruoka S, Boon K, et al. In utero supplementation with methyl donors enhances allergic airway disease in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008 Oct;118(10):3462–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI34378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 51.Blatter J, Han YY, Forno E, et al. Folate and asthma. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2013 Jul 1;188(1):12–7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201302-0317PP. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Devereux G, Litonjua AA, Turner SW, et al. Maternal vitamin D intake during pregnancy and early childhood wheezing. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Mar;85(3):853–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.3.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Camargo CA, Jr., Rifas-Shiman SL, Litonjua AA, et al. Maternal intake of vitamin D during pregnancy and risk of recurrent wheeze in children at 3 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Mar;85(3):788–95. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.3.788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Miyake Y, Sasaki S, Tanaka K, et al. Dairy food, calcium and vitamin D intake in pregnancy, and wheeze and eczema in infants. The European respiratory journal. 2010 Jun;35(6):1228–34. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00100609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Maslova E, Hansen S, Jensen CB, et al. Vitamin D intake in mid-pregnancy and child allergic disease -- a prospective study in 44,825 Danish mother-child pairs. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Oct 31;13(1):199. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Camargo CA, Jr., Ingham T, Wickens K, et al. Cord-blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of respiratory infection, wheezing, and asthma. Pediatrics. 2011 Jan;127(1):e180–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gale CR, Robinson SM, Harvey NC, et al. Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and child outcomes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jan;62(1):68–77. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Devereux G. Session 1: Allergic disease: Nutrition as a potential determinant of asthma. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010 Feb;69(1):1–10. doi: 10.1017/S0029665109991753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nurmatov U, Devereux G, Sheikh A. Nutrients and foods for the primary prevention of asthma and allergy: systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2011 Mar;127(3):724–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.001. e1-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Goldring ST, Griffiths CJ, Martineau AR, et al. Prenatal vitamin d supplementation and child respiratory health: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nguyen M, Trubert CL, Rizk-Rabin M, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and fetal lung maturation: immunogold detection of VDR expression in pneumocytes type II cells and effect on fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004 May;89-90(1-5):93–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nguyen TM, Guillozo H, Marin L, et al. Evidence for a vitamin D paracrine system regulating maturation of developing rat lung epithelium. The American journal of physiology. 1996 Sep;271(3):L392–9. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1996.271.3.L392. Pt 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Edelson JD, Chan S, Jassal D, et al. Vitamin D stimulates DNA synthesis in alveolar type-II cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Mar 31;1221(2):159–66. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(94)90008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gaultier C, Harf A, Balmain N, et al. Lung mechanics in rachitic rats. The American review of respiratory disease. 1984 Dec;130(6):1108–10. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.6.1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nguyen TM, Guillozo H, Marin L, et al. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors in rat lung during the perinatal period: regulation and immunohistochemical localization. Endocrinology. 1990 Oct;127(4):1755–62. doi: 10.1210/endo-127-4-1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Marin L, Dufour ME, Nguyen TM, et al. Maturational changes induced by 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in type II cells from fetal rat lung explants. The American journal of physiology. 1993 Jul;265(1):L45–52. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1993.265.1.L45. Pt 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Marin L, Dufour ME, Tordet C, et al. 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulates phospholipid biosynthesis and surfactant release in fetal rat lung explants. Biol Neonate. 1990;57(3-4):257–60. doi: 10.1159/000243200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Phokela SS, Peleg S, Moya FR, et al. Regulation of human pulmonary surfactant protein gene expression by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005 Oct;289(4):L617–26. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00129.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sakurai R, Shin E, Fonseca S, et al. 1alpha,25(OH)2D3 and its 3-epimer promote rat lung alveolar epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and inhibit lipofibroblast apoptosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009 Sep;297(3):L496–505. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.90539.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Haland G, Carlsen KC, Sandvik L, et al. Reduced lung function at birth and the risk of asthma at 10 years of age. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1682–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zosky GR, Berry LJ, Elliot JG, et al. Vitamin D deficiency causes deficits in lung function and alters lung structure. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2011 May 15;183(10):1336–43. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201010-1596OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gorman S, Weeden CE, Tan DH, et al. Reversible control by vitamin D of granulocytes and bacteria in the lungs of mice: an ovalbumin-induced model of allergic airway disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kho AT, Sharma S, Qiu W, et al. Vitamin D related genes in lung development and asthma pathogenesis. BMC Med Genomics. 2013 Nov 5;6(1):47. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-6-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Moffatt MF, Kabesch M, Liang L, et al. Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma. Nature. 2007 Jul 26;448(7152):470–3. doi: 10.1038/nature06014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Maurano MT, Humbert R, Rynes E, et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science. 2012 Sep 7;337(6099):1190–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1222794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kajekar R. Environmental factors and developmental outcomes in the lung. Pharmacol Ther. 2007 May;114(2):129–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wang X, Dockery DW, Wypij D, et al. Pulmonary function between 6 and 18 years of age. Pediatric pulmonology. 1993 Feb;15(2):75–88. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950150204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]