Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2014 Sep 1;29(2):183–190. doi: 10.1037/neu0000122

Table 3.

Demographic and clinical data of twelve participants with ipsilesional neglect

Sex Age Edu. MMSE BIT Barthel CBS Where Aiming
S1 F 30 14 30 128 90 2 −35.35 −1.63
S2 M 74 11 22 114 65 17 −1.67 −2.51
S3 M 66 12 25 26 5 23 −0.83 −9.98
S4 M 53 16 29 67 10 5 −11.79 −3.44
S5 F 59 12 21 65 35 23 −14.00 −2.35
S6 F 41 18+ 26 67 30 - −43.44 −4.57
S7 M 67 9 21 58 15 20 −14.46 3.08
S8 M 68 8 13 104 10 21 −10.73 6.00
S9 M 76 12 23 59 0 27 −25.90 −13.79
S11 F 76 8 17 101 20 - −10.00 −15.92

Mean - 61 12 22.7 78.9 28 17.25 −16.82 −4.51
SD - 15.48 3.30 5.19 31.39 28.79 8.01 13.99 6.93

S10 M 76 18 29 129 60 - −1.55 −4.77
S12 M 78 12 16 93 30 5 −11.22 −5.18

Mean - 77 15 22.5 111 60 - −6.38 −4.97
SD - 1.14 4.24 9.19 25.46 21.21 - 6.84 .29

Notes. F= female, M=male; Edu.= Education in years; Where and Aiming error in mm (analysis performed on Z-scores); S1–S9 & S11 are individuals whose brain scans were classified as demonstrating frontal lobe/subcortical damage; S10 and S12 are individuals without classified frontal lobe/subcortical damage on brain imaging.