Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Mar 2;5:8670. doi: 10.1038/srep08670

Cocaine exposure impairs multineage hematopoiesis of human hematopoietic progenitor cells mediated by the sigma-1 receptor

Christopher C Nixon 1,4, Brandon H Schwartz 2,4, Dhaval Dixit 1,4, Jerome A Zack 1,3,4, Dimitrios N Vatakis 3,4,a
PMCID: PMC4345342  PMID: 25728014

Abstract

Prenatal exposure to cocaine is a significant source of fetal and neonatal developmental defects. While cocaine associated neurological and cardiac pathologies are well-documented, it is apparent that cocaine use has far more diverse physiological effects. It is known that in some cell types, the sigma-1 receptor mediates many of cocaine's cellular effects. Here we present a novel and concise investigation into the mechanism that underlies cocaine associated hematopoietic pathology. Indeed, this is the first examination of the effects of cocaine on hematopoiesis. We show that cocaine impairs multilineage hematopoiesis from human progenitors from multiple donors and tissue types. We go on to present the first demonstration of the expression of the sigma-1 receptor in human CD34 + human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these cocaine-induced hematopoietic defects can be reversed through sigma-1 receptor blockade.

World annual cocaine use currently stands at around 600 metric tons, with Americans consuming roughly half and Europeans, about a quarter and thus represents a significant public health concern. Specifically, prenatal exposure to drugs of abuse is a significant source of fetal developmental pathology1. The majority of research on the health impact of cocaine use on fetal health has been focused on neurological2,3,4 and cardiac effects5,6 and these are well documented. In contrast, little is known about the effects of cocaine on hematopoiesis.

Prenatal cocaine exposure clearly impacts development. Cocaine is able to cross the placenta and the blood-brain barrier allowing it to impact the fetus7. Structural abnormalities are evident in the brains8 and hearts9 of neonates exposed to cocaine in utero. However, it is not known if this is the result exclusively of direct toxicity to cells of the developing nervous and/or cardiac systems or other effects of cocaine use. Low-birth weight has also been documented in neonates born to mothers who use cocaine10,11,12.

Cocaine exposure is known to influence the function of immune cells. Cocaine can increase T-cell apoptosis, alter immune related miRNA profiles, change immune activation state, and impair lymphocyte proliferation13,14,15,16,17. However, little has been studied in terms of how drugs of abuse impact hematopoiesis. There is a single clinical report of severe aplastic anemia following extreme chronic 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine (MDMA) use18 and there are a handful of reports addressing the effects of marijuana on blood cell development19. Reports of hematopoietic disregulation due to cocaine use are few but do support the hypothesis that cocaine disrupts normal blood cell homeostasis20,21. Cocaine exerts its effects at a cellular level in-part through the sigma-1 receptor (S1R)22,23,24,25. The S1R is an endoplasmic reticulum molecular chaperone expressed in a variety of cell types. Depending on the context, the S1R is able to either inhibit or potentiate a number of different ion channels. Furthermore, the S1R has been implicated in a number of diseases including HIV, cancer, depression and addiction22,23.

Previously, we demonstrated that quiescent T cell susceptibility to HIV infection can be modulated by cocaine, in part through its interactions with the S1R22. Here, we report the singular finding that the developmental potential of human hematopoietic progenitor cells that are exposed to nontoxic levels of cocaine was severely depressed. Interestingly, we found that S1R blockade relieved the impairment and allowed for normal hematopoiesis to proceed. Thus, our data suggest that stimulant exposure can impact human hematopoiesis and that the S1R may play a role in this developmental process, beyond substance abuse.

Results

Nontoxic levels of cocaine exposure depresses multilineage hematopoiesis from human CD34 + HSPC

We first sought to determine if exposure to physiologically relevant concentrations of cocaine is toxic to human hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs). Cocaine treatment levels and exposure time were used based on previous studies that determined on the basis of physiological effect on T cells without any toxicity risks22,26. CD34 + progenitors from fetal liver (FL) were incubated at varying timepoints with cocaine. Following treatment, a portion of the cells from both cocaine exposed and untreated cultures were examined by flow cytometry for cell death. Representative flow cytometry plots indicate no apparent differences in cell viability comparing untreated and cocaine treated cells at 24 and 48 hours post-exposure (Fig. 1a,b). Prior to cocaine exposure, cultures were approximately 85% viable while they were approximately 86% viable at 24 and 48 hours post drug exposure. Cultures were further examined for up to 10 days following exposure and monitored for evidence of toxicity(Fig. 1a,b). There were no evident differences in the viability of cultures that were exposed to cocaine compared to those that were not. These data indicate that cocaine is nontoxic to HSPCs in culture at a concentration of 10−8 M.

Figure 1. Cocaine is not immediately toxic to HSPCs.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Representative live/dead dye exclusion flow cytometry viability assay of (A) cocaine treated and (B) untreated HSPC in culture for ten days. For each, top left panel: 0 hrs, top middle panel: 24 hrs, top right panel: 48 hours, bottom left panel: 5 days, bottom middle panel: 7 days, bottom right panel: 10 days.

Since cocaine had no apparent impact on cell viability, we then addresed whether cocaine exposure alters the hematopoietic potential of HSPCs derived from either FL, cord blood (CB), or adult bone marrow (BM). A portion of the cells from cocaine treated and untreated cultures were plated in complete methylcellulose and analyzed two weeks later for the development of hematopoietic colonies. In plates derived from HSPCs treated with cocaine, total colony number was severely reduced compared to untreated HSPCs (Fig. 2a,2b,2c). In FL derived cultures from three separate donors, cocaine treated cells gave rise to an average of 23 +/− 3 total colonies while untreated cells gave rise to an average of 87 +/− 17 total colonies. This difference is statistically significant by two tailed t-test with a P value <0.001. In CB derived cultures from three separate donors, cocaine treated cells gave rise to an average of 25 +/− 3 total colonies while untreated cells gave rise to an average of 93 +/− 17 total cells. This difference is statistically significant by two-tailed t-test with a p value <0.001. In BM derived cultures from three individual donors, cocaine treated progenitors gave rise to an average of 13 +/− 3 total colonies while untreated progenitors gave rise to an average of 44 +/− 5 total colonies. This difference is statistically significant by two-tailed t-test with a p value <0.001.

Figure 2. Nontoxic cocaine exposure impairs multilineage hematopoiesis.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Methylcellulose colony forming assay for untreated and cocaine treated HSPC derived from three different FL donors. Each mark represents the score on a sinlge plate, and the bar marks the mean. (B) Methylcellulose colony forming assay for untreated and cocaine treated HSPC derived from three different CB donors. Each mark represents the score on a sinlge plate, and the bar marks the mean. (C) Methylcellulose colony forming assay for untreated and cocaine treated HSPC derived from three different BM donors. Each mark represents the score on a sinlge plate, and the bar marks the mean. (D) Phenotypic analysis of colonies that developed from FL derived HSPCs treated with cocaine. (E) Phenotypic analysis of colonies that developed from CB derived HSPCs treated with cocaine. (F) Phenotypic analysis of colonies that developed from BM derived HSPCs treated with cocaine. Red boxes/E erythroid colonies, blue boxes/G granulocyte colonies, black boxes/M macrophage colonies, green boxes/GM mixed granolocyte/macrophage colonies.

When colonies are analyzed by phenotype, development of all lineages are severely impaired in cultures derived from FL (fig. 2d), CB (fig. 2e) and BM (fig. 2e). Indeed, Table 1 shows that in almost every case derived from FL and CB, each type of colony from each donor, from both source tissue types, HSPCs that have been exposed to nonlethal levels of cocaine are impaired for development of all cell types. There is no apparent pattern of donor/colony types in which development is not impaired in a statistically significant fashion following drug exposure. All erythroid colonies from all but donor 3 showed that difference between the number of colonies that develop from untreated compared to cocaine treated progenitors. It is difficult to interpret the colony numbers of both the erythroid and the granulocyte/macrophage mixed cultures due to the fact that the numbers of these colony types in untreated cultures were quite low. However, there is strong significance in the differences in total colony number from this donor. BM derived cultures show similar results. While there were no differences in erythroid colonies that developed from cocaine treated compared to untreated progenitors, the development of almost all other myeloid colonies from all donors were suppressed in cultures derived from treated progenitors. Overall, these data indicate that cocaine exposure suppresses myeloid development from HSPCs derived from multiple tissues and types.

Table 1. Hematopoietic colonies derived from untreated or cocaine exposed CD34 + cells from either fetal liver, cord blood, or adult bone marrow. Donors 1–3 represent fetal liver, donors 4–6 represent cord blood, and donors 7–9 represent adult bone marrow. Values are the Mean and SEM. E, erythroid, M, macrophage, G, granulocyte, GM, mixed granulocyte-macrophage colonies.

  E P value M P value G P value GM P value Total P value
Donor 1 12.67 +/− 1.453 0.0023 23.67 +/− 6.848 0.0056 26.00 +/− 4.359 0.0206 22.67 +/− 2.333 0.0102 85.00 +/− 4.933 0.0008
Cocaine 2.333 +/− 0.333   7.00 +/− 1.155   8.667 +/− 1.667   10.67 +/− 1.202   26.67 +/− 3.712  
Donor 2 16.67 +/− 3.283 0.0088 19.67 +/− 4.333 0.027 29.00 +/− 7.371 0.0752 20.67 +/− 2.028 0.0015 88.00 +/− 14.57 0.0088
Cocaine 0.6667 +/− 0.6667   4.000 +/− 1.528   9.667 +/− 3.333   3.000 +/− 1.528   17.33 +/− 2.667  
Donor 3 1.333 +/− 0.6667 0.4216 6.000 +/− 0.5774 0.0005 21.33 +/− 4.702 0.015 5.667 +/− 3.844 3.469 34.33 +/− 8.0819 0.001
Cocaine 0.6667 +/− 0.3333   0.0 +/− 0.0   1.333 +/− 1.333   1.333 +/− 1.333   3.333 +/− 0.6667  
Donor 4 22.33 +/− 3.390 0.0082 21.33 +/− 4.153 0.0059 44.67 +/− 10.88 0.001 23.67 +/− 2.102 0.001 112.0 +/− 6.557 0.0004
Cocaine 3.000 +/− 0.5774   6.667 +/− 2.333   7.667 +/− 2.404   2.667 +/− 2.186   20.0 +/− 5.508  
Donor 5 22.67 +/− 8.344 0.0113 21.33 +/− 7.164 0.083 30.00 +/− 5.217 0.0024 23.00 +/− 5.132 0.065 97.00 +/− 6.658 0.0007
Cocaine 3.333 +/− 2028   10.00 +/− 1.528   11.00 +/− 1.155   9.333 +/− 1.202   33.33 +/− 1.333  
Donor 6 14.00 +/− 1.732 0.0074 19.33 +/− 1.856 0.0011 21.33 +/− 4.910 0.0674 14.67 +/− 2.333 0.0269 69.33 +/− 9.871 0.0085
Cocaine 2.667 +/− 1.453   3.333 +/− 0.3333   8.333 +/− 1.764   6.000 +/− 1.000   20.33 +/− 2.333  
Donor 7 9.667 +/− 2.603 0.3164 15.00 +/− 4.041 0.0849 8.333 +/− 1.667 0.0354 14.67 +/− 1.453 0.0101 51.00 +/− 6.083 0.0096
Cocaine 5.667 +/− 2.333   5.667 +/− 0.6667   2.000 +/− 1.155   7.333 +/− 0.6667   20.67 +/− 2.333  
Donor 8 12.33 +/− 4.333 0.0939 13.67 +/− 2.728 0.0387 7.00 +/− 1.155 0.0214 13.67 +/− 1.856 0.0154 47.00 +/− 7.506 0.0142
Cocaine 2.333 +/− 1.453   5.333 +/− 0.333   1.667 +/− 0.882   5.667 +/− 0.6667   14.67 +/− 2.028  
Donor 9 3.00 +/− 2.082 0.223 10.67 +/− 1.202 0.002 6.00 +/− 2.00 0.04 13.33 +/− 3.528 0.091 33.00 +/− 4.359 0.005
Cocaine 0.00 +/− 0.00   0.667 +/− 0.667   0.00 +/− 0.00   4.00 +/− 2.309   4.667 +/− 2.404  
Open in a new tab

The sigma-1 receptor is expressed in human CD34+ HSPCs

As previous work has implicated the sigma-1 receptor in mediating the cellular effects of cocaine22,26, we sought to determine if this receptor is present in human HSPCs. RT-PCR anaylsis for the sigma-1 receptor transcript in FL derived HSPCs from four separate donors indicate that it is indeed expressed in blood progenitors (Fig. 3a). The average of three RT-PCR reactions from donor 1 indicated 0.14 +/− 0.0078 copies of S1R per copy of GAPDH, while it was 0.17 +/− 0.0083 for donor 2, 0.11 +/− 0.013 for donor 3, and 0.14 +/− 0.0088 for donor 4.

Figure 3. The sigma-1 receptor is expressed in HSPCs and mediates cocaine's hematosuppressive effects.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) RT-PCR analysis of sigma-1 receptor in FL derived HSPCs from four separate donors. S1R expression is graphed relative to GAPDH expression and the average of three replicate reactions is plotted. (B) Methylcellulose colony forming assays of FL derived HSPCs that were either untreated, cocaine treated, S1R block treated, and cocaine + block treated. Each mark represents the score on a single plate, and the bar marks the mean. (C) Representative images of hematopoietic colonies that developed from S1R-block treated (top) or untreated (bottom) HSPC. (D) Phenotypic analysis of colonies that developed from HSPCs that were either untreated, cocaine treated, S1R block treated, and cocaine + block treated. Red boxes/E erythroid colonies, blue boxes/G granulocyte colonies, black boxes/M macrophage colonies, green boxes/GM mixed granolocyte/macrophage colonies.

S1R blockade alleviates cocaine-induced suppression of hematopoiesis

To elucidate the mechanism by which cocaine suppresses hematopoiesis, we expanded our cocaine exposure experiments to include blockade of the sigma-1 receptor. FL derived HSPCs from three separate donors were either left untreated or treated with cocaine, S1R blockade, or both for 48 hours and then plated in complete methylcellulose. Two weeks later, plates were scored for hematopoietic colony development. The total number of colonies that developed in cultures derived from cells that were treated with either S1R blockade or cocaine and S1R blockade were indiscernible while cultures that were treated with cocaine alone show significantly reduced total colony numbers (Fig. 3b). In this set of experiments, untreated HSPCs from all three donors gave rise to an average of 56 +/− 13 colonies per plate while those exposed to cocaine gave rise to only 12 +/− 2 colonies per plate. HSPCs that were treated with only the receptor block gave rise to 51 +/− 12 colonies and HSPCs that were treated with receptor block and cocaine gave rise to 51 +/− 13 colonies per plate. There were no significant differences in the total colony number that developed from untreated, receptor block treated, or receptor block and cocaine treated HSPCs.

Phenotypic analysis indicates that neither treatment with S1R block or S1R block and cocaine appears to alter hematopoietic lineage commitment (Fig. 3d). To confirm that treatment with the receptor block is not toxic to developing hematopoietic colonies, individual colonies from each of the treatment conditions were examined by microscopy (Fig. 3c). Table 2 shows that only cocaine exposure results in a statistically significant loss of developmental potential. Interestingly, macrophages were the only lineage that was not impaired with cocaine treatment. Granulocyte, macrophage, and mixed granulocyte/macrophage colonies were clearly suppressed by cocaine exposure of HSPCs from all three donors. There were no statistically significant differences in the colony forming potential between untreated HSPC and those treated with just S1R blockade or both S1R blockade and cocaine. Together these data clearly show that the S1R can mediate changes in human hematopoiesis.

Table 2. Hematopoietic colonies derived from either untreated, cocaine, SR1 block, or cocaine and SR1 block exposed CD34 + cells that had been isolated from fetal liver. Values are the Mean and SEM. E, erythroid, M, macrophage, G, granulocyte, GM, mixed granulocyte-macrophage colonies.

  E P value M P value G P value GM P value
Donor 1 12.67 +/− 3.712   13.67 +/− 2.333   14.33 +/− 2.906   17.33 +/− 6.360  
Cocaine 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.027 11.33 +/− 2.603 0.541 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.0079 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.0527
S1R Block 11.67 +/− 1.453 0.8143 9.333 +/− 2.963 0.3416 12.00 +/− 2.517 0.5766 20.33 +/− 3.180 0.6948
Both 14.33 +/− 2.728 0.7358 13.33 +/− 2.603 0.9286 13.00 +/− 2.082 0.7281 15.67 +/− 2.404 0.8184
Donor 2 10 +/− 2.887   13.00 +/− 2.646   13.33 +/− 2.603   15.33 +/− 3.756  
Cocaine 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.0257 12.00 +/− 3.606 0.834 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.0069 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.015
S1R Block 8.333 +/− 2.333 0.6767 14.00 +/− 3.215 0.822 10.00 +/− 3.125 0.4655 15.33 +/− 0.8819 0.9999
Both 8.333 +/− 2.028 0.6612 12.00 +/− 3.215 0.822 13.00 +/− 2.309 0.9283 16.00 +/− 3.606 0.9043
Donor 3 9.00 +/− 2.887   14.00 +/− 3.215   14.67 +/− 3.180   14.33 +/− 2.603  
Cocaine 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.0356 11.00 +/− 3.606 0.5682 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.0099 0.0 +/− 0.0 0.0053
S1R Block 10.00 +/− 3.215 0.8283 14.33 +/− 4.055 0.8722 13.33 +/− 2.906 0.7724 14.00 +/− 3.786 0.9456
Both 7.333 +/− 2.028 0.6612 11.67 +/− 3.383 0.6433 13.33 +/− 4.096 0.8098 14.00 +/− 1.555 0.8662
Open in a new tab

Discussion

In conclusion, our studies strongly demonstrate that cocaine exposure has far reaching effects on human development and is detrimental to early and intermediate stages of human hematopoiesis. We show that in HSPCs derived from both fetal liver and cord blood, cocaine exposure results in depressed hematopoietic potential as determined by colony forming assays. Moreover, we show that blockade of the sigma-1 receptor restores normal hematopoietic potential. Together these data establish the novel concept that cocaine exposure modulates human hematopoiesis.

It was previously reported that acute cocaine exposure induced terminal erythrocytosis as measured by hematocrit and reticulocyte count18. While this may seem to contradict the data presented here, it is important to note that erythroid colonies that develop in methylcellulose are not composed of terminally differentiated red blood cells but a mixture of intermediate-late erythroid progenitors. The investigators reported an increase in hematocrit but not reticulocyte count which would indicate an increase in terminally differentiated erythrocytes but not one in the production and/or release of immature red blood cells. Furthermore, the study consisted only of cocaine users who reported to the emergency department with drug associated acute chest pain. Therefore, we do not believe this represents a accurate picture of cocaine exposure.

Interestingly, macrophages seemed unaffected by cocaine exposure in the last set of experiments. This suggests the possibility that a macrophage precursor may be tolerant to the effects of cocaine exposure and demands further study. As this was not observed in the first set of experiments, more detailed analysis will be required. It is important to remember that the CD34 + population is composed of diverse phenotypes and each sample is unique it its distribution of these. Taken together, these points clearly indicate that each subpopulation of HSPCs should be studied under the same conditions.

This work opens the door to further study of the impact of drugs of abuse on human hematopoiesis. An early study indicated that mice deficient in the mu-opiod receptor, which mediates the cellular effects of a number of drugs of abuse, showed increased developmental potential and were in a much higher cycling state of HSPC relative to their wild-type counterparts27.

As this may potentially have downstream effects on the immune system of children exposed to cocaine in utero, S1R blockade may represent a potential protective treatment for women at high risk for drug abuse during pregnancy. Moreover, it is possible that some of the impaired development that results from in utero cocaine expose could be due to impaired blood development.

Methods

Ethics statement

Peripheral blood mononulear cells and cord blood were obtained at the University of California, Los Angeles in accordance with UCLA Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved protocols under written informed consent using an IRB-approved written consent form by the UCLA/CFAR Virology Laboratory and was distributed for this study without personal identifying information. Human fetal tissue was purchased from the UCLA/CFAR Gene Therapy Core, was obtained without identifying information and did not require IRB approval for use. All experiments and agents used were carried out and used in accordance with the UCLA Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC).

Isolation and culture of human hematopoietic stem cells

Mononuclear cells were obtained from the buffy coats of either processed fetal liver or cord blood or adult bone marrow (Allcells, Alameda, CA) following Ficoll-Hypaqe density gradient separation. CD34 + HSPCs were sorted from buffy coats by MACS using CD34 + magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA) and LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec) following manufacturer's protocol. Cells were cultured in StemSPAN™ serum-free media (Stem Cell Technologies) supplemented with stem cell factor (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), thrombopoietin (Life Technologies), IGF-BP2 (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), and Flt3-ligand (Life Technologies), all at a concentration of 100 ng/mL.

Cocaine treatment and sigma-1 receptor blockade

Cocaine was added to cultures at a concentration of 10−8 M. The sigma-1 receptor blockade BD1047 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to cultures at a concentration of 10−6 M. Both remained in culture for forty eight hours until cells were plated in methylcellulose.

Colony forming assays

Cells were plated in Methocult™ H4435 enriched methylcellulose (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC) at a concentration of 500/mL and cultured in 35 mm grid plates, 1 mL per plate, in triplicate per condition, for two weeks in a 37°C 5% CO2 incubator. Hematopoietic colonies were scored in a blinded fashion. Colonies were counted on a Nikon Eclipse TE300 microscope at 400x magnification.

Real-time RT-PCR

RNA was isolated from cells using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's protocol. PCR reactions were performed using the One Step RT-PCR Kit for Probes (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) and FAM labeled primer-probsets for SIR and GAPDH transcripts manufactured by Advanced Biosystems Inc. Twenty μl reactions were prepared for each sample with 5 μl of target RNA. All samples were run in triplicate. Samples were analyzed along with standards of known concentration to allow for quantification. All reactions were carried out on an IQCycler thermalcycler (Biorad). Cycling conditions were: 1 cycle of reverse transcription for 10 min at 50° C, one denaturation cycle for 3 min at 95°C, followed by 40 amplification cycles. Analysis was performed with iQ5 software (Biorad).

Flow cytometry

The Live/Dead® Aqua dye (Life Technologies) was used following manufacturers protocol to determine viability in HSPC cultures. Briefly, 1 × 106 cells were harvested from untreated and cocaine treated cultures at the indicated timepoints and washed twice and then resuspended in 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). One uL of dye was added to each sample, mixed, and then incubated in the dark for 30 minutes. Cells were then washed and fixed for 15 minutes in PBS-37% formaldehyde. Fixed cells were maintained in 500 uL PBS-37% formaldehyde at 4°C in the dark until flow cytometry analysis. All stained cells were analyzed together on an LSRFortessa™ (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) flow cytometer.

Statistics

All statistical analysis was performed with Graphpad Prism software (La Jolla, CA, USA). P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Author Contributions

C.C.N., J.A.Z. and D.N.V. wrote the paper and designed the experiments. C.C.N., B.H.S. and D.D. performed the experiments.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health grants R21DA031036-01A1 (to D.N.V.), T32 HL086345 (to C.C.N.) and 5P30 AI028697 (UCLA/CFAR to J.A.Z.). We would like to thank the UCLA-CFAR Virology Core lab and the UCLA-CFAR Cell and Gene Therapy Core lab for supplying CB and FL respectively.

References

  1. Ganapathy V. Drugs of abuse and human placenta. Life Sci 88, 926–930 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellone C., Mameli M. & Luscher C. In utero exposure to cocaine delays postnatal synaptic maturation of glutamatergic transmission in the VTA. Nat Neurosci 14, 1439−1446 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benveniste H. et al. Cocaine is pharmacologically active in the nonhuman primate fetal brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 1582−1587 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Meyer K. D. & Zhang L. Short- and long-term adverse effects of cocaine abuse during pregnancy on the heart development. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 3, 7−16 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Behnke M. & Smith V. C. Prenatal substance abuse: short- and long-term effects on the exposed fetus. Pediatrics 131, e1009−1024 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen W. A. & Maier S. E. Combination drug use and risk for fetal harm. Alcohol Res Health 34, 27−28 (2011). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mayes L. C., Granger R. H., Frank M. A., Schottenfeld R. & Bornstein M. H. Neurobehavioral profiles of neonates exposed to cocaine prenatally. Pediatrics 91, 778−783 (1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roussotte F., Soderberg L. & Sowell E. Structural, metabolic, and functional brain abnormalities as a result of prenatal exposure to drugs of abuse: evidence from neuroimaging. Neuropsychol Rev 20, 376−397 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Messiah S. E., Miller T. L., Lipshultz S. E. & Bandstra E. S. Potential latent effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on growth and the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease in childhood. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 31, 59−65 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eyler F. D., Behnke M., Conlon M., Woods N. S. & Wobie K. Birth outcome from a prospective, matched study of prenatal crack/cocaine use: I. Interactive and dose effects on health and growth. Pediatrics 101, 229−237 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauer C. R. et al. Acute neonatal effects of cocaine exposure during pregnancy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159, 824−834 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Richardson G. A. Prenatal cocaine exposure. A longitudinal study of development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 846, 144−152 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mantri C. K., Pandhare Dash J., Mantri J. V. & Dash C. C. Cocaine enhances HIV-1 replication in CD4 + T cells by down-regulating MiR-125b. PLoS One 7, e51387 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pandhare J. et al. Cocaine enhances HIV-1-induced CD4(+) T-cell apoptosis: implications in disease progression in cocaine-abusing HIV-1 patients. Am J Pathol 184, 927−936 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pellegrino T. & Bayer B. M. In vivo effects of cocaine on immune cell function. J Neuroimmunol 83, 139−147 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pereira J. et al. Platelet activation in chronic cocaine users: effect of short term abstinence. Platelets 22, 596−601 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rios-Olivares E. et al. Impaired cytokine production and suppressed lymphocyte proliferation activity in HCV-infected cocaine and heroin ("speedball") users. Drug Alcohol Depend 85, 236−243 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weber J. E. et al. Effect of cocaine use on bone marrow-mediated erythropoiesis. Acad Emerg Med 10, 705−708 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kump D. F., Stanulis E. D., Holsapple M. P., Conrad D. H. & Rosecrans J. A. Cocaine-induced release of corticosterone mediates differential effects on T-helper1 and T-helper2 cell responses. Adv Exp Med Biol 437, 189−198 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bayer B. M., Hernandez M. C. & Ding X. Z. Tolerance and crosstolerance to the suppressive effects of cocaine and morphine on lymphocyte proliferation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53, 227−234 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kourrich S. et al. Dynamic interaction between sigma-1 receptor and Kv1.2 shapes neuronal and behavioral responses to cocaine. Cell 152, 236−247 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim S. G. et al. Cocaine exposure enhances permissiveness of quiescent T cells to HIV infection. J Leukoc Biol 94, 835−843 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maurice T. & Su T. P. The pharmacology of sigma-1 receptors. Pharmacol Ther 124, 195−206 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Narayanan S., Mesangeau C., Poupaert J. H. & McCurdy C. R. Sigma receptors and cocaine abuse. Curr Top Med Chem 11, 1128−1150 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Navarro G. et al. Direct involvement of sigma-1 receptors in the dopamine D1 receptor-mediated effects of cocaine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 18676−18681 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Roth M. D., Whittaker K. M., Choi R., Tashkin D. P. & Baldwin G. C. Cocaine and sigma-1 receptors modulate HIV infection, chemokine receptors, and the HPA axis in the huPBL-SCID model. J Leukoc Biol 78, 1198−1203 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tian M. et al. Altered hematopoiesis, behavior, and sexual function in mu opioid receptor-deficient mice. J Exp Med 185, 1517−1522 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES