Skip to main content
Clinical Medicine Insights. Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Medicine Insights. Case Reports
. 2015 Feb 26;8:15–17. doi: 10.4137/CCRep.S23139

Life Threatening Hemoperitoneum and Liver Injury as a Result of Chest Tube Thoracostomy

Jung-Min Bae 1,
PMCID: PMC4345926  PMID: 25780345

Abstract

Common complications of chest tube thoracostomy (CTT) include lung laceration, chest wall bleeding, improper position of tube, subcutaneous emphysema, and so on. Although intra-abdominal injury because of CTT was possible in stomach, spleen, and liver, published reports are rare and no case of life-threatening hemoperitoneum because of CTT has been published in the literature. Here, we present a rare case of life-threatening hemoperitoneum and liver injury because of CTT. We successfully treated the case with emergent laparotomy. Owing to great rarity and particular rare complication of CTT, we report this case with a review of literature.

Keywords: hemoperitoneum, liver injury, thoracostomy

Introduction

Common complications of chest tube thoracostomy (CTT) include lung laceration, chest wall bleeding, improper position of tube, subcutaneous emphysema, and so on.1

Although intra-abdominal injury because of CTT was possible in stomach, spleen, and liver, published reports are rare and no case of life-threatening hemoperitoneum because of CTT has been published in English literature.

We recently experienced a 72-year-old female patient diagnosed with massive hemoperitoneum and liver injury because of CTT. We successfully treated this patient with laparotomy. This report concerns a rare case of life-threatening hemoperitoneum and liver injury because of CTT, including imaging and review of the literature. The patient has given consent for the publication of this report.

Case Report

A 72-year-old female came to the emergency department because of a pedestrian traffic accident. She was diagnosed with a right distal femur fracture, right clavicle fracture, left femur fracture, and pelvic bone fracture. Initial abdomen computed tomography (CT) scan showed no fluid collection in the abdominal cavity (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The CT finding. (A) The initial CT scan in the emergency department reveals no fluid collection in the perihepatic area. (B) The CT scan reveals massive fluid collection, and the white arrow indicates contrast extravasation from the liver surface.

Her general state was aggravated because of ongoing bleeding in the injured pelvic bone area. She was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Acute renal failure (ARF) and respiratory failure developed in the ICU because of ongoing bleeding and vigorous fluid resuscitation. Hemodialysis and mechanical ventilation were applied.

On hospital day 5, open reduction of a fractured bone was performed. On hospital day 6, chest radiograph at morning showed right lung haziness, suggesting pleural effusion. CTT was performed for resolving right pleural effusion.

Under local anesthesia, a small incision was made in the skin parallel to the sixth rib, just anterior to the mid-axillary line and well below the pectoralis major muscle mass and breast. Using a clamp, a subcutaneous tract was tunneled posteriorly along the chest wall. The pleural space was entered just over the superior rib margin using a trocar-type chest tube. However, pleural fluid was not drained. Therefore, insertion site compression was performed for several minutes and was closed completely by suture. A second CTT was performed in the fifth rib skin area, and pleural fluid was drained. The second CTT was performed successfully without any complication.

Approximately 90 minutes later, she developed abdomen distension. Blood pressure was 60/40 mmHg. In follow-up laboratory findings, serum hemoglobin was decreased to 6.1 g/dL compared to 9.7 g/dL in the morning’s laboratory finding. Operative wound site of open reduction operation was clear and with non-specific bleeding sign. Abdomen CT was performed immediately. Abdomen CT showed massive fluid collection and contrast extravasation from the liver surface (Fig. 1B), suggesting hemoperitoneum and chest tube location was intra-thoracic cavity (Fig. 2). Emergent laparotomy was performed. Initially, approximately 2500 cc blood was drained from the abdominal cavity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The chest tube location. (AD) The CT scan revealed proper location and tract of the right chest tube.

A blood pumping lesion was detected on the liver surface of segment 6 and about 1 cm sized.

Based on these operative findings, we considered penetrating liver injury because of CTT.

Therefore, bleeding focus was controlled by electronic cauterization and an absorbable fibrin sealant patch (TachoSil® Baxter). After operation, the patient’s postoperative course was uneventful.

Discussion

CTT is a common bedside procedure in surgical patients. Although CTT was performed frequently in surgical patients, several complications can occur with CTT, including lung laceration, chest wall bleeding, improper position of tube, subcutaneous emphysema, and so on.1

The overall complication rate of CTT is 1–36% in previously published literature.24 The most common injury because of CTT is direct lung injury. Although intra-abdominal injury because of CTT is possible in stomach, spleen, and liver, the published reports of life-threatening intra-abdominal injury are very rare. Therefore, the CTT-induced liver injury rate was not reported in the literature. A retrospective study of 447 patients of CTT reported only 1 patient with liver laceration.2 However, no case of CTT-induced life-threatening hemoperitoneum and liver injury was published in English literature.

The mechanism of CTT-induced liver injury is a penetrating injury mechanism. The mechanism of CTT-induced penetrating liver injury is similar to that of percutaneous liver biopsy-induced liver injury. Also, rarely, percutaneous liver biopsy-induced life-threatening hemoperitoneum and liver injury has been reported in the literature.5

The common clinical manifestation of CTT-induced liver injury is intra-abdominal bleeding. If bleeding is minimal, clinical deterioration is minimal. However, if there is a large amount of bleeding, the patient can develop sudden clinical deterioration, including abdomen distension, abdominal pain, hypovolemic shock, and diverse shock-related symptoms and signs.

A sudden deterioration of the general condition of the patient following a CTT should arouse suspicion of complications. In principle, prompt diagnostic procedures, such as chest radiograph, abdomen radiograph, or abdomen CT, are needed.

In hemoperitoneum, traditional treatment is open laparotomy and bleeding control. However, according to some clinicians, laparoscopic management may be an alternative for hemoperitoneum in stable patients.6 In liver biopsy-induced penetrating liver injury, laparoscopic management was performed successfully.7

Although emergency laparotomy was performed in our patient, when the clinician well understood the cause of injury, injury site, and bleeding focus, laparoscopic management was available.

We controlled bleeding using an absorbable fibrin sealant patch. The use of the absorbable fibrin sealant patch resulted in achievement of significantly fast hemostasis in liver resection.8

CTT-induced intra-abdominal organ injury can be prevented by the use of a high approach and insertion of the chest tube at or above the inter-mammary line in the fourth or fifth intercostal space.9 An effective method is to place the skin incision in the fifth or sixth intercostal space, and then tunnel up over the rib and insert the tube through the next higher interspace.9

In conclusion, CTT is one of the frequently performed bedside procedures. Common complications of CTT include lung laceration, chest wall bleeding, improper position of tube, and subcutaneous emphysema. However, we describe a rare case with a review of the literature so that lethal complications such as hemoperitoneum and liver injury because of CTT and its adequate treatment should be understood.

Footnotes

Author Contributions

Conceived the concepts: JMB. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: JMB. Made critical revisions and approved final version: JMB. The author reviewed and approved of the final manuscript.

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Athavale Nandkishor, Associate Editor

FUNDING: This work was supported by the 2014 Yeungnam University Research Grant. The author confirms that the funder had no influence over the study design, content of the article, or selection of this journal.

COMPETING INTERESTS: Author discloses no potential conflicts of interest.

Paper subject to independent expert blind peer review by minimum of two reviewers. All editorial decisions made by independent academic editor. Upon submission manuscript was subject to anti-plagiarism scanning. Prior to publication all authors have given signed confirmation of agreement to article publication and compliance with all applicable ethical and legal requirements, including the accuracy of author and contributor information, disclosure of competing interests and funding sources, compliance with ethical requirements relating to human and animal study participants, and compliance with any copyright requirements of third parties. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Vander Salm TJ, Cutler BS, Wheeler HB. Atlas of Bedside Procedures. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1988. pp. 268–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Millikan JS, Moore EE, Steiner E, Aragon GE, Van Way CW., III Complications of tube thoracostomy for acute trauma. Am J Surg. 1980;140:738–41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90107-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chan L, Reilly KM, Henderson C, Kahn F, Salluzzo RF. Complication rates of tube thoracostomy. Am J Emerg Med. 1997;15:368–70. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90127-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Daly RC, Mucha P, Pairolero PC, Farnell MB. The risk of percutaneous chest tube thoracostomy for blunt thoracic trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14:865–70. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(85)80635-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aoki Y, Takamiya M, Satoh T, Fujita S, Kato H, Maeno Y. A fatal case of hemoperitoneum after ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in a patient with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2011;13:191–5. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lujan-Mompean JA, Parrilla-Paricio P, Robles-Campos R, Torralba-Martinez JA, Sanchez-Bueno F, Arenas-Ricart J. Laparoscopic surgery in the management of traumatic hemoperitoneum in stable patients. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:879–81. doi: 10.1007/BF00768882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vettoretto N, Romessis M, Di Gaspare A, Pettinato G, Arru L, Giovanetti M. Hemoperitoneum after percutaneous liver biopsy. Video-laparoscopic management. Ann Ital Chir. 2007;78:65–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fischer L, Seiler CM, Broelsch CE, et al. Hemostatic efficacy of TachoSil in liver resection compared with argon beam coagulator treatment: an open, randomized, prospective, multicenter, parallel-group trial. Surgery. 2011;149:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Poncia H, Ryan JM. An unusual complication of chest tube thoracostomy. CJEM. 2000;2:121–3. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500004760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Medicine Insights. Case Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES