Abstract
Coronary artery problems in children usually have a significant impact on both short-term and long-term outcomes. Early and accurate diagnosis, therefore, is crucial but technically challenging due to the small size of the coronary artery, high heart rates, and limited cooperation of children. Coronary artery visibility on CT and MRI in children is considerably improved with recent technical advancements. Consequently, CT and MRI are increasingly used for evaluating various congenital and acquired coronary artery abnormalities in children, such as coronary artery anomalies, aberrant coronary artery anatomy specific to congenital heart disease, Kawasaki disease, Williams syndrome, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
Keywords: Coronary artery, Infants and children, CT, MRI, Echocardiography, Catheter angiography
INTRODUCTION
Coronary artery imaging in children is frequently challenging due to small size, high heart rates, and motion artifacts from cardiac pulsation, respiration, and the patients themselves, which results in technical or procedural difficulties (1). Imaging modalities for evaluating coronary arteries include catheter angiography, echocardiography, CT, and MRI. Awareness of the pros and cons of each imaging modality minimizes patient risks and maximizes diagnostic yields. Recent technical advancements in CT and MRI for evaluating the coronary arteries are extremely valuable (1, 2, 3).
Coronary artery imaging in children is important because the coronary blood flow to the myocardium and the cardiac conduction tissue maintains normal cardiac function. Various congenital and acquired coronary artery abnormalities in children, such as coronary artery anomalies, surgically important coronary artery anatomy specific to congenital heart disease, coronary artery abnormalities in Kawasaki disease, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy, can be identified with these imaging modalities. Review of imaging modalities in children for coronary artery, resultant coronary artery visibility, and clinical applicability will facilitate the practical clinical use of pediatric coronary artery imaging.
Imaging Modalities
High temporal resolution for high heart rates, high spatial resolution for small size, and low patient risks are required for coronary artery imaging in children (1, 2). The advantages and shortcomings of imaging modalities used for coronary artery imaging in children, including catheter angiography, echocardiography, CT, and MRI, were described in this section. Recent technical advancements in coronary CT angiography and coronary MR angiography were also reviewed.
Catheter Angiography
Catheter angiography has been used for evaluating coronary arteries in children for the past few decades. Aortography is generally used to visualize coronary arteries in small children younger than 1 year of age, while selective coronary angiography may be performed in older children (e.g., older than 5 years of age) (1). Complications associated with selective coronary angiography are not trivial, ranging from relatively frequent minor ones including temporary electrocardiography (ECG) changes (11.0%), transient bradycardia (2.5%), and vascular access-related complications (11.6%), to rare serious ones, such as ventricular fibrillation (0.6%) (4). Besides these complications, the use of ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agent in catheter angiography is another concern particularly in children. Therefore, it should be reserved for interventional procedures or when noninvasive diagnostic imaging is inconclusive. Furthermore, because it is a 2-dimensional projection imaging, catheter angiography lacks the 3-dimensional spatial relationship between the coronary arteries and adjacent cardiovascular structures.
Echocardiography
Transthoracic 2-dimensional echocardiography along with color and pulsed-wave Doppler is widely used as the primary imaging modality of coronary arteries in children (5). However, echocardiography is often limited by operator dependency, poor acoustic window especially in older or postoperative children, and intrinsic diagnostic pitfalls (Fig. 1). For instance, an echo free space between the left atrial appendage and periaortic tissue may give a false impression of the left coronary artery normally arising from the left aortic sinus of Valsalva in children with anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) (5). As a result, confirmatory imaging, such as CT or MRI, should be performed if echocardiographic findings are equivocal or negative in patients with high clinical suspicion of coronary artery abnormalities.
CT
Coronary CT angiography is currently regarded as the diagnostic imaging method of choice for evaluating coronary arteries. ECG-synchronized scanning, i.e., either retrospective ECG gated spiral scanning or prospective ECG-triggered sequential scanning, should be performed for coronary CT angiography (2). To maximize the diagnostic yield of coronary CT angiography, selection of the best cardiac phase and the optimal scan delay with an optimized contrast injection protocol is crucial (2, 6, 7, 8). The recently introduced high-pitch dual-source spiral scanning with prospective ECG triggering enabling the whole scan in one heartbeat may also be used for evaluating coronary arteries (6, 7). It should be noted that images acquired with this scan mode show different cardiac phases along the z-axis, which is clearly different from ECG-synchronized scans showing the same cardiac phase for the entire scanned volume. Although the image quality of ECG-triggered high-pitch dual-source spiral scan is obviously inferior to those of ECG-synchronized scans, it serves as a troubleshooting scanning technique in irritable or unstable children (Fig. 2). As beta-blockers or sublingual nitroglycerin is frequently employed prior to coronary CT angiography to decrease the heart rate or to dilate the coronary arteries in adults, these preparations should be carefully applied to children because beta-blockers substantially prolong patient preparation time with no guaranteed success and the unpleasant taste of sublingual nitroglycerin may irritate pediatric patients (9). In addition to coronary artery morphology, CT can show first-pass myocardial hypoperfusion and delayed myocardial enhancement resulting from significant coronary artery stenosis or occlusion, as in cardiac MRI (10). However, optimal imaging protocol and clinical value of delayed myocardial enhancement CT imaging have yet to be established in children (Fig. 3). Minimal CT radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality can be achieved by various radiation dose-reduction strategies, such as individual body size-adapted scan parameters, minimal longitudinal scan range, tube current modulation(ECG-controlled or not), low tube voltage, adaptive section collimation, and iterative reconstruction algorithm, which is of utmost importance in children (2, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). It is noteworthy that pediatric cardiac CT is more frequently used than pediatric cardiac MRI in Asian countries for several reasons (16).
MRI
Free-breathing, ECG-triggered, navigator-gated, T2-prepared, 3-dimensional coronary MR angiography using steady state free precession (SSFP) sequence, is the current standard in clinical practice. The imaging technique does not require the administration of contrast agent due to endogenous contrast between the coronary arteries and the surrounding tissue, accentuated by fat saturation and T2 preparation prepulses. However, examination using the SSFP sequence is often performed after the injection of a gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agent for other reasons, such as contrast-enhanced MR angiography and late gadolinium enhancement MRI because the signal-to-noise ratio is considerably increased on the contrast-enhanced study at either 1.5-T or 3.0-T (Fig. 4). Although it does not use ionizing radiation, coronary MR angiography is limited by long examination time and low spatial resolution that are problematic in imaging young children. Coronary CT angiography, only requires adjustment of the trigger delay to obtain the best cardiac phase because the duration of the acquisition window, i.e., the temporal resolution, is fixed. In contrast, the 2 parameters are independently determined according to the cardiac rest periods evaluated with 50-80-phase 4-chamber cine imaging for each patient in coronary MR angiography. Depending on the data acquisition method of coronary MR angiography, 2 approaches, i.e., target-volume vs. whole-heart, are available (Fig. 5) (3, 9). Multiple sub-volumes targeted on each coronary artery are obtained in the target-volume approach, while only 1 volume, usually in the axial plane, including the whole heart is acquired for the whole-heart approach. The image quality is the same between the 2 approaches (3). As compared with the whole-heart approach, the main drawbacks of the target-volume approach include limited volumetric coverage, low visibility of the coronary artery branches, and operator dependency in localizing the scan plane. Multi-planar and 3-dimensional visualization of all the 3 major coronary arteries is an advantage of the whole-heart approach with isotropic voxels. Shorter imaging time in coronary MR angiography has a higher success rate. This can be achieved by using a 32-channel cardiac coil and a high parallel imaging factor. Recent studies (3, 17) show that inversion-recovery SSFP sequence with an intravascular blood pool contrast agent, such as gadofosveset trisodium, substantially improves image quality and diagnostic performance of coronary MR angiography compared with T2-prepared SSFP sequence. However, gadofosveset trisodium is not widely available in Asia.
Abnormally thickened coronary artery walls can be imaged by using an ECG-triggered, navigator-gated double inversion recovery black-blood segmented turbo spin-echo sequence (18, 19). However, long acquisition time limits its practical use. Moreover, slow flow artifacts indistinguishable from mural thrombus or eccentric wall thickening should be recognized as a diagnostic pitfall of the coronary vessel wall MRI (Fig. 6). In contrast to CT, cardiac MRI can provide comprehensive assessment of cardiac function, myocardial perfusion, and myocardial viability as well as coronary artery morphology (9, 20, 21).
Coronary Artery Visibility in Children
Coronary artery visibility on CT and MRI tends to be compromised in young children due to the small size of the coronary arteries and very high heart rates. Nevertheless, coronary artery visibility has markedly improved with recent technical improvement in CT and MRI (Table 1) (9, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27). ECG-synchronized CT scanning for coronary arteries should be used in children because the scan technique shows significantly higher coronary artery visibility than non-ECG-synchronized CT scanning (Table 1). In children, coronary artery visibility for all segments on ECG-synchronized CT largely ranges from 79% to 89%, which is higher than that (60-79%) on MRI (Table 1). Despite intensive imaging procedures, such as general anesthesia with repeated ventilator stoppings, the success rate of coronary MR angiography is merely 17% in infants younger than 4 months of age (27). However, the success rate of coronary CT angiography is substantially higher than coronary MR angiography in newborns and infants (23, 24, 25). In addition, coronary CT angiography is generally better than coronary MR angiography in evaluating coronary luminal stenosis in children, primarily due to higher spatial resolution of CT.
Table 1. Coronary Artery Visibility on CT and MRI in Children.
Author | Patient Number and Age | Imaging Modality | Scanning Method | Coronary Artery Visibility |
---|---|---|---|---|
Goo et al. (22) | 104 children; median, 11 months; range, 1 day-15 years | 16-slice CT | Non-ECG-synchronized scan | Proximal, 82%; all, 49% |
Tsai et al. (23) | 12 newborns; mean, 16 days | 40-slice CT | Non-ECG-synchronized data from ECG-gated scan | Proximal, 46%; all, 28% |
ECG-gated scan | Proximal, 100%; all, 85% | |||
Ben Saad et al. (24) | 32 infants; mean, 132 days; range, 1-361 days | 32-slice dual-source CT | Non-ECG-synchronized scan | Proximal and middle, 43% for LCA, 15% for RCA |
ECG-gated scan | Proximal and middle, 91% for LCA, 84% for RCA | |||
Goo and Yang (25) | 93 children; median, 5 months; range, 1 day-6 years | 32-slice dual-source CT | Non-ECG-synchronized scan | Proximal, 72%; all, 54% |
ECG-triggered scan | Proximal, 97%; all, 79% | |||
Kim and Goo (9) | 17 patients; mean, 14 years; range, 2 months-24 years | 16-slice CT, 32-slice, and 64-slice dual-source CT | ECG-gated or ECG-triggered scan | All, 89% |
1.5-T MRI | Target-volume or whole-heart approach | All, 74% | ||
Taylor et al. (20) | 16 children; mean, 11 years; range, 9-14 years | 1.5-T MRI | Target-volume approach | Proximal, 72% |
Takemura et al. (26) | 35 children; median, 4 years; range, 8 months-7 years | 1.5-T MRI | Target-volume and whole-heart approaches | All, 60% |
Tangcharoen et al. (27) | 100 children; mean, 4 years; range, 2 months-11 years | 1.5-T MRI | Whole-heart approach | All, 79% |
Note.- ECG = electrocardiography, LCA = left coronary artery, RCA = right coronary artery
The selection of the best cardiac phase is required to increase coronary artery visibility equally on both CT and MRI. The mid-diastolic phase usually provides the best image quality of the coronary arteries at slow and regular heart rates, though such heart rhythms are uncommon in children. At higher heart rates (e.g., > 70-75 bpm), the end-systolic phase is apt to offer higher coronary artery visibility than the mid-diastolic phase because the mid-diastolic cardiac rest period gets invariably shorter with increasing heart rates. The end-systolic phase is more resistant to arrhythmia or heart rate variability than other cardiac phases. Although not fully recognized yet, the end-diastolic phase may be used as the third alternative for the best cardiac phase.
Clinical Applications
With recent improvements in coronary artery visibility on CT and MRI in children as described above, the diagnostic accuracy and the resultant clinical utility of coronary CT angiography and coronary MR angiography are noticeably increasing in children. Hence, we need to recognize the extent to which we can enhance pediatric coronary artery imaging with the recent technical improvements in clinical practice. We accordingly described various congenital and acquired coronary artery abnormalities in children in this section.
Coronary Artery Anomalies
Coronary artery anomaly is defined as an anatomical variation observed in < 1% of the general population. Two classification systems for coronary artery anomalies are commonly used (28, 29). One is according to the location of the anomalies, including origin, course, and termination, while the other is according to hemodynamic significance of the anomalies. Hemodynamically significant coronary artery anomalies may compromise myocardial perfusion that leads to adverse cardiac events, such as myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death, in children. They include atresia of the left coronary artery, ALCAPA, anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva with interarterial/intramural course, and coronary artery fistula. Atresia involving the left main coronary artery is most often described (29). However, the right coronary artery (Fig. 7) or the left circumflex artery may be rarely affected (29). Collateral vessels are usually developed from patent coronary artery to the atretic coronary artery (Fig. 7). However, the collateral flow is generally insufficient to meet the oxygen requirement of the left ventricular myocardium occurring mostly in the first year of life in atresia of the left main coronary artery. ALCAPA usually presents with congestive heart failure in infants and should be distinguished from dilated cardiomyopathy at this age (30). Because echocardiographic findings may be often inconclusive (5), CT or MRI can be used for identifying ALCAPA and the extent of myocardial infarction (Fig. 1). A recent study (31) showed that intramural segments in anomalous coronary arteries with interarterial course can be identified on coronary CT angiography by demonstrating acute angle of origin, slit-like orifice, and elliptical cross-sectional shape with vessel height/width ratio greater than 1.3. Coronary artery fistula is defined as a direct precapillary connection between a coronary artery and a low-pressure system, such as the right cardiac chamber, pulmonary artery, or coronary sinus, resulting in a usually small left-to-right shunt (32, 33, 34, 35). Coronary artery fistula is generally asymptomatic in adults, while it is often symptomatic in pediatric patients. The majority of coronary artery fistulas have single communications and most symptomatic fistulas arise from the right coronary artery. Coronary artery fistula usually occurs in isolation but may occur in complex congenital heart disease, such as pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum in which myocardial ischemia may be developed due to the so-called right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation (35). Coronary CT angiography provides detailed angioarchitecture of coronary artery fistula and its spatial relationship with the nearby major cardiovascular structures, which is necessary for optimal treatment planning (32, 33, 34, 35). In addition to hemodynamically significant anomalies, hemodynamically benign coronary artery anomaly, such as high take-off, may be clinically significant at cardiac surgery (28, 36) (Fig. 7).
Congenital Heart Disease
Cardiac CT is increasingly used for preoperative morphologic evaluation of congenital heart disease (2, 6, 7, 16, 37, 38, 39). Coronary arteries are commonly included in the evaluation due to recently improved coronary artery visibility on cardiac CT (23, 24, 25). Prevalence of coronary artery anomalies in patients with congenital heart disease is higher than that in the general population. In addition, certain coronary artery anatomy should be vigilantly depicted on CT or MRI in certain congenital heart disease, such as transposition of the great arteries or tetralogy of Fallot, to avoid potential damage to these aberrant coronary arteries during or after surgery (27, 28, 40, 41). Moreover, the left main coronary artery may rarely be extrinsically compressed by a dilated pulmonary artery in various congenital heart diseases or pulmonary arterial hypertension, as demonstrated on catheter coronary angiography or coronary CT angiography (42, 43, 44). The affected left coronary artery is possibly vulnerable to the extrinsic compression because it tends to originate from the right side of the left aortic sinus. Postoperative CT or MRI can also be used to identify significant coronary artery stenosis and to elucidate the underlying mechanism, i.e., stretching, kinking, or compression, of coronary luminal narrowing in children with congenital heart disease (20, 28, 45). Coronary CT angiography is useful to evaluate native coronary artery patency, as well as bypass graft patency in children with congenital or acquired heart disease after coronary revascularization surgery (Fig. 8) (46).
Kawasaki Disease
Kawasaki disease is the most common cause of acquired coronary artery disease in children necessitating lifelong imaging surveillance for coronary artery obstruction and altered myocardial perfusion (9, 18, 21, 26, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53). Echocardiography is the primary imaging modality to identify a subset (approximately 15-25%) of patients with coronary artery dilatation or aneurysm during the acute phase of the disease up to the first 6 weeks after presentation. At this period, CT or MRI may be used for complete initial mapping of the coronary artery abnormalities required for accurate risk stratification because echocardiography is often limited in evaluating middle and distal segments of the coronary arteries, particularly in growing children. These coronary artery aneurysms are then gradually subject to regression, stenosis, occlusion, thrombosis, and myointimal thickening, frequently without overt clinical manifestations (Figs. 5, 6). For serial imaging follow-up, assessment of myocardial perfusion is generally recommended in addition to morphologic assessment of the coronary arteries. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy may be omitted and 1-stop shop evaluation is feasible when stress myocardial perfusion imaging with CT or MRI is added to the cardiac imaging protocol for patients with Kawasaki disease. For evaluating coronary luminal stenosis, coronary CT angiography appears slightly better than coronary MR angiography (9, 49). The benefit-risk ratio of coronary CT angiography becomes more favorable with various radiation dose-reducing techniques. Serial follow-up coronary CT angiography at a 3-year interval in patients with Kawasaki disease is regarded as acceptable by our institution, but there are no established guidelines yet. Optimal diagnostic algorithm, for evaluating coronary artery abnormalities in Kawasaki disease based on an expert consensus opinion, remains to be updated with the recent technical advances in cardiac CT and MRI. As a result, catheter coronary angiography can be reserved when noninvasive imaging findings are inconclusive or equivocal, or when interventions are planned.
Williams Syndrome
Supravalvular aortic stenosis and peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis are a hallmark of cardiovascular manifestations of Williams syndrome (54, 55). Supravalvular aortic stenosis is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death in these patients. The so-called "coronary hooding" phenomenon occurred by the aortic valve leaflets fused to the sinotubular junction may result in myocardial ischemia. Furthermore, the coronary arteries located proximal to the supravalvular aortic stenosis are subject to high systolic pressures and result in coronary artery stenosis. Cardiac CT is useful to evaluate cardiovascular manifestations, including supravalvular aortic stenosis and coronary artery abnormalities, of Williams syndrome (Fig. 9) (54, 55).
Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is one of the late complications of heart transplantation, typically seen as a diffuse, concentric, noncalcified wall thickening of the coronary arteries (19, 47, 56, 57). The affected patients are usually clinically asymptomatic because the transplanted heart often remains denervated. Consequently, imaging surveillance using accurate and noninvasive techniques is needed. Coronary CT angiography is regarded as the imaging method of choice for the diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy because it has a high sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value comparable to invasive catheter coronary angiography (56, 57). A 2-year follow-up interval appears to be safe for detecting a significant coronary artery lesion when the previous coronary CT angiography is normal (56). On the other hand, late gadolinium enhancement MRI of the coronary vessel wall may be used to detect and grade cardiac allograft vasculopathy (19).
Cardiac involvement of graft-versus-host disease is very rare and one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (58). Similar to cardiac allograft vasculopathy, multiple concentric narrowings of the coronary arteries may be developed in patients with cardiac graft-versus-host disease (Fig. 3). Bradycardia or cardiomyolysis may also occur (58).
CONCLUSION
After recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of imaging modalities for coronary artery imaging, we can optimize imaging protocols and algorithms for evaluating and monitoring congenital and acquired coronary artery abnormalities in children. CT and MRI play a key role in overcoming the diagnostic challenges in coronary artery imaging in children by avoiding the diagnostic pitfalls of echocardiography and reducing risks related to catheter coronary angiography. Coronary CT angiography is particularly useful in newborns and young infants.
References
- 1.Lederlin M, Thambo JB, Latrabe V, Corneloup O, Cochet H, Montaudon M, et al. Coronary imaging techniques with emphasis on CT and MRI. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:1516–1525. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2222-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goo HW. State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11:4–18. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tang L, Merkle N, Schär M, Korosoglou G, Solaiyappan M, Hombach V, et al. Volume-targeted and whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography using an intravascular contrast agent. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1191–1196. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vranicar M, Hirsch R, Canter CE, Balzer DT. Selective coronary angiography in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2000;21:285–288. doi: 10.1007/s002460010064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Attili A, Hensley AK, Jones FD, Grabham J, DiSessa TG. Echocardiography and coronary CT angiography imaging of variations in coronary anatomy and coronary abnormalities in athletic children: detection of coronary abnormalities that create a risk for sudden death. Echocardiography. 2013;30:225–233. doi: 10.1111/echo.12030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Goo HW. Cardiac MDCT in children: CT technology overview and interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011;49:997–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goo HW. Current trends in cardiac CT in children. Acta Radiol. 2013;54:1055–1062. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weininger M, Barraza JM, Kemper CA, Kalafut JF, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Cardiothoracic CT angiography: current contrast medium delivery strategies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W260–W272. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim JW, Goo HW. Coronary artery abnormalities in Kawasaki disease: comparison between CT and MR coronary angiography. Acta Radiol. 2013;54:156–163. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mendoza DD, Joshi SB, Weissman G, Taylor AJ, Weigold WG. Viability imaging by cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010;4:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goo HW, Suh DS. Tube current reduction in pediatric non-ECG-gated heart CT by combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:344–351. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-0105-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goo HW, Suh DS. The influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation: a phantom study. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:833–840. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0177-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang DH, Goo HW. Pediatric 16-slice CT protocols: radiation dose and image quality. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2008;59:333–347. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goo HW. Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:839–847. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2121-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goo HW. CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13:1–11. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tsai IC, Goo HW. Cardiac CT and MRI for congenital heart disease in Asian countries: recent trends in publication based on a scientific database. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(Suppl 1):1–5. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0184-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Makowski MR, Wiethoff AJ, Uribe S, Parish V, Botnar RM, Bell A, et al. Congenital heart disease: cardiovascular MR imaging by using an intravascular blood pool contrast agent. Radiology. 2011;260:680–688. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Greil GF, Seeger A, Miller S, Claussen CD, Hofbeck M, Botnar RM, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography and vessel wall imaging in children with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:666–673. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0498-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hussain T, Fenton M, Peel SA, Wiethoff AJ, Taylor A, Muthurangu V, et al. Detection and grading of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary vessel wall. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:91–98. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.975797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Hamaekers P, Razavi R, Gewillig M, Mertens L, et al. MR coronary angiography and late-enhancement myocardial MR in children who underwent arterial switch surgery for transposition of great arteries. Radiology. 2005;234:542–547. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2342032059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tacke CE, Kuipers IM, Groenink M, Spijkerboer AM, Kuijpers TW. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive assessment of cardiovascular disease during the follow-up of patients with Kawasaki disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:712–720. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.965996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Yun TJ, et al. Visibility of the origin and proximal course of coronary arteries on non-ECG-gated heart CT in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:792–798. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-1482-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tsai IC, Lee T, Chen MC, Fu YC, Jan SL, Wang CC, et al. Visualization of neonatal coronary arteries on multidetector row CT: ECG-gated versus non-ECG-gated technique. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:818–825. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0512-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ben Saad M, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Adler G, Paul JF. Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose of thoracic and coronary dual-source CT in 110 infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39:668–676. doi: 10.1007/s00247-009-1209-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goo HW, Yang DH. Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronized spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:1670–1680. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1693-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Takemura A, Suzuki A, Inaba R, Sonobe T, Tsuchiya K, Omuro M, et al. Utility of coronary MR angiography in children with Kawasaki disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:W534–W539. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tangcharoen T, Bell A, Hegde S, Hussain T, Beerbaum P, Schaeffter T, et al. Detection of coronary artery anomalies in infants and young children with congenital heart disease by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2011;259:240–247. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goo HW, Seo DM, Yun TJ, Park JJ, Park IS, Ko JK, et al. Coronary artery anomalies and clinically important anatomy in patients with congenital heart disease: multislice CT findings. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39:265–273. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-1111-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shriki JE, Shinbane JS, Rashid MA, Hindoyan A, Withey JG, DeFrance A, et al. Identifying, characterizing, and classifying congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries. Radiographics. 2012;32:453–468. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Peña E, Nguyen ET, Merchant N, Dennie G. ALCAPA syndrome: not just a pediatric disease. Radiographics. 2009;29:553–565. doi: 10.1148/rg.292085059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miller JA, Anavekar NS, El Yaman MM, Burkhart HM, Miller AJ, Julsrud PR. Computed tomographic angiography identification of intramural segments in anomalous coronary arteries with interarterial course. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:1525–1532. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9936-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zenooz NA, Habibi R, Mammen L, Finn JP, Gilkeson RC. Coronary artery fistulas: CT findings. Radiographics. 2009;29:781–789. doi: 10.1148/rg.293085120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hu X, Wu L, Liu F, Shen Q, Pa M, Huang G. Coronary artery fistulas in children. Evaluation with 64-slice multidetector CT. Herz. 2013;38:729–735. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3786-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marini D, Agnoletti G, Brunelle F, Bonnet D, Ou P. Left coronary to right ventricle fistula in a child: management strategy based on cardiac-gated 64-slice CT. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38:325–327. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0664-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Séguéla PE, Houyel L, Loget P, Piot JD, Paul JF. Critical stenosis of a right ventricle to coronary artery fistula seen at dual-source CT in a newborn with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:1069–1072. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tsai WL, Wei HJ, Tsai IC. High-take-off coronary artery: a haemodynamically minor, but surgically important coronary anomaly. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:232–233. doi: 10.1007/s00247-009-1413-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Yun TJ, et al. CT of congenital heart disease: normal anatomy and typical pathologic conditions. Radiographics. 2003;23 Spec No:S147–S165. doi: 10.1148/rg.23si035501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Park JJ. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005;21:347–365. doi: 10.1007/s10554-004-4015-0. discussion 367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nie P, Wang X, Cheng Z, Ji X, Duan Y, Chen J. Accuracy, image quality and radiation dose comparison of high-pitch spiral and sequential acquisition on 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2057–2066. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2479-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Beerbaum P, Sarikouch S, Laser KT, Greil G, Burchert W, Körperich H. Coronary anomalies assessed by whole-heart isotropic 3D magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac morphology in congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:320–327. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yu FF, Lu B, Gao Y, Hou ZH, Schoepf UJ, Spearman JV, et al. Congenital anomalies of coronary arteries in complex congenital heart disease: diagnosis and analysis with dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013;7:383–390. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sengupta PP, Saxena A, Rajani M. Left main coronary artery compression by aneurysmal pulmonary artery in a patient with tetralogy of Fallot with absent pulmonary valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:438–440. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199904)46:4<438::AID-CCD10>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kajita LJ, Martinez EE, Ambrose JA, Lemos PA, Esteves A, Nogueira da, et al. Extrinsic compression of the left main coronary artery by a dilated pulmonary artery: clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic determinants. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:49–54. doi: 10.1002/1522-726x(200101)52:1<49::aid-ccd1012>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Safi M, Eslami V, Shabestari AA, Saadat H, Namazi MH, Vakili H, et al. Extrinsic compression of left main coronary artery by the pulmonary trunk secondary to pulmonary hypertension documented using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol. 2009;32:426–428. doi: 10.1002/clc.20457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ou P, Celermajer DS, Marini D, Agnoletti G, Vouhé P, Brunelle F, et al. Safety and accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in children after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:331–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marini D, Agnoletti G, Brunelle F, Sidi D, Bonnet D, Ou P. Cardiac CT angiography after coronary artery surgery in children using 64-slice CT scan. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:492–497. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ou P, Kutty S, Khraiche D, Sidi D, Bonnet D. Acquired coronary disease in children: the role of multimodality imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43:444–453. doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2478-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH. Coronary CT angiography and MR angiography of Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:697–705. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Arnold R, Ley S, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Eichhorn J, Schenk JP, Ulmer H, et al. Visualization of coronary arteries in patients after childhood Kawasaki syndrome: value of multidetector CT and MR imaging in comparison to conventional coronary catheterization. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:998–1006. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0566-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Peng Y, Zeng J, Du Z, Sun G, Guo H. Usefulness of 64-slice MDCT for follow-up of young children with coronary artery aneurysm due to Kawasaki disease: initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:500–509. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Carbone I, Cannata D, Algeri E, Galea N, Napoli A, De Zorzi A, et al. Adolescent Kawasaki disease: usefulness of 64-slice CT coronary angiography for follow-up investigation. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:1165–1173. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2141-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yu Y, Sun K, Wang R, Li Y, Xue H, Yu L, et al. Comparison study of echocardiography and dual-source CT in diagnosis of coronary artery aneurysm due to Kawasaki disease: coronary artery disease. Echocardiography. 2011;28:1025–1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01486.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Duan Y, Wang X, Cheng Z, Wu D, Wu L. Application of prospective ECG-triggered dual-source CT coronary angiography for infants and children with coronary artery aneurysms due to Kawasaki disease. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e1190–e1197. doi: 10.1259/bjr/18174517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gray JC, 3rd, Krazinski AW, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG, Pietris NP, Suranyi P, et al. Cardiovascular manifestations of Williams syndrome: imaging findings. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013;7:400–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ergul Y, Nisli K, Kayserili H, Karaman B, Basaran S, Dursun M, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery abnormalities in Williams syndrome patients using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and CT angiography. Cardiol J. 2012;19:301–308. doi: 10.5603/cj.2012.0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rohnean A, Houyel L, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, To NT, Elfassy E, Paul JF. Heart transplant patient outcomes: 5-year mean follow-up by coronary computed tomography angiography. Transplantation. 2011;91:583–588. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182088b96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mittal TK, Panicker MG, Mitchell AG, Banner NR. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: electrocardiographically gated cardiac CT angiography for assessment. Radiology. 2013;268:374–381. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rackley C, Schultz KR, Goldman FD, Chan KW, Serrano A, Hulse JE, et al. Cardiac manifestations of graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:773–780. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]