Abstract
Approximately 8 million people have Trypanosoma cruzi infection, and nearly 30% will manifest Chagas cardiomyopathy (CC). Identification of reliable early indicators of CC risk would enable prioritization of treatment to those with the highest probability of future disease. Serum markers and electrocardiogram (EKG) changes were measured in 68 T. cruzi-infected individuals in various stages of cardiac disease and 17 individuals without T. cruzi infection or cardiac disease. T. cruzi-infected individuals were assigned to stage A (normal EKG/chest x-ray [CXR]), B (abnormal EKG/normal CXR), or C (abnormal EKG/cardiac structural changes). Ten serum markers were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)/Luminex, and QRS scores were calculated. Higher concentrations of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1), and TGFβ2 were associated with stage B compared with stage A. Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), Tissue Inhibitors of MMP 1, QRS score, and Brain Natriuretic Protein rose progressively with increasing CC severity. Elevated levels of several markers of cardiac damage and inflammation are seen in early CC and warrant additional evaluation in longitudinal studies.
Introduction
Chagas disease is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Endemic transmission by triatomine vectors occurs in many Latin American countries, where an estimated 8–11 million people are currently infected.1 Although many infected individuals are asymptomatic, approximately 20–30% will progress to clinically significant heart disease, with onset occurring years to decades after the initial infection.1,2 Early cohort studies in highly endemic areas showed 2–3% annual incidence of cardiac disease,3,4 and a recent retrospective cohort analysis of blood donors in Brazil showed a 1.85% annual cardiomyopathy incidence attributable to T. cruzi over a 10-year period.5
The earliest signs of Chagas cardiomyopathy (CC) are typically conduction system abnormalities, with subsequent progression to ventricular arrhythmias, dilated cardiomyopathy, apical aneurysm, and thrombus formation.6,7 Ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular dysfunction are strongly associated with premature mortality risk in infected individuals but relatively late indicators of cardiac dysfunction.8
The pathogenesis of CC is thought to occur through inflammation caused by parasite persistence, which over time, leads to fibrotic changes.9,10 The literature suggests several molecules, such as Brain Natriuretic Protein (BNP), that might rise with CC progression; most are known to be associated with dilated cardiomyopathy and/or congestive heart failure of other etiologies.11 Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), MMP9, and Tissue Inhibitors of MMP 1 (TIMP1) have been linked to matrix remodeling in heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and other cardiac diseases.12–14 MMPs activate transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), an important regulator of inflammation, and TGFβ1 has been shown to play a central role in the pathogenesis of T. cruzi heart disease in animal models.15–17 Serum TGFβ correlates well with CC severity in humans18 and induces expression of Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF), a secreted profibrogenic cytokine that is correlated with increasing diastolic dysfunction in humans by promoting myofibroblast differentiation and extracellular matrix synthesis.19–21 Procollagen Type I C-terminal Propeptide (PICP) is formed when procollagen is cleaved in the process of forming fibrils. In heart disease patients, PICP levels correlate with severity of myocardial fibrosis.22 Procollagen Type III N-terminal Propeptide (PIIINP) reflects collagen synthesis and extracellular matrix turnover, and it was found to correlate with cardiac damage in an experimental guinea pig model.23 Taken together, this body of work suggests that the presence of serum molecules elicited by escalating cardiac damage could function as an early biomarker for CC.
In addition to serum molecules, we also calculated a QRS scar score from each subject's EKG. This score summarizes EKG abnormalities based on Q-, R-, and S-wave durations, amplitudes, and morphologies following published methods of calculation, with modifications in the presence of conduction system abnormalities.24 Each point corresponds to scarring of 3% of the left ventricle.25 In patients with CC, the QRS score has been shown to provide an accurate estimate of myocardial scar size as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and shows a correlation with history of ventricular tachycardia and worsening heart failure symptoms.26 Our objective was to investigate the association of these serum proteins and QRS scar score with presence and severity of CC to identify promising markers for future rigorous evaluation.
Methods
Ethics statement.
This protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; Atlanta, GA), Asociación Benéfica Proyectos en Informatica, Salud, Medicina y Agricultura (Lima, Peru), and Hospital Universitario Japones (Santa Cruz, Bolivia). All participants provided written informed consent as well as assent and parental consent for children less than 18 years old. Both adults and children participated in the initial epidemiological study, but only adults 17 or older are included in this analysis. All research activities adhered to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Study population.
Blood specimens for this analysis came from two studies: a community-based survey in the Bolivian Chaco and a hospital-based study of heart disease in Santa Cruz, the closest large city to the Chaco.27,28 The Chaco is a sparsely populated, hot, and semiarid lowland region that encompasses parts of Bolivia, Argentina, Paraguay, and Brazil that has the highest prevalence of T. cruzi infection in the world.28,29 Serum samples from adults in the community study were eligible for inclusion if confirmed T. cruzi infection status and complete EKG and chest x-ray (CXR) data were available. Individuals from the hospital-based study in Santa Cruz were positive for T. cruzi by serology, had complete EKG and CXR data, and were diagnosed with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart disease.27 In total, 85 individuals (64 individuals from the community study and 21 individuals from the hospital study) were included in this study.
Sample collection.
A 6- to 12-mL blood specimen was obtained from each participant using clot-activator tubes (BD Vacutainer, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The samples were transported to the nearby Camiri Hospital Laboratory on ice, centrifuged, and separated into serum and clot using standard protocol. Sera were immediately stored at −20°C. Serum specimens were then stored at the Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, CDC Laboratory for use in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Luminex as described below.
T. cruzi diagnosis.
T. cruzi serologies were determined by the indirect hemagglutination assay (Chagas Polychaco Kit; Lemos Laboratories, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and Chagatest parasite lysate ELISA (Wiener Laboratories, Rosario, Argentina). A third assay, either the Chagatest Recombinante 3.0 ELISA (Wiener Laboratories, Rosario, Argentina) or the immunofluorescence antibody test with a titer of 1:32 as the positive cutoff, was performed on samples with discordant results. A subject was considered to have confirmed T. cruzi infection if the serum specimen showed positive results by at least two serological assays.30 Individuals with discordant serological results that could not be resolved were excluded from this analysis.
Electrocardiographic analysis and QRS scoring.
All patients underwent standard 12-lead EKGs, which were read by two different cardiologists. A third reader was used for EKGs with discordant findings. EKG analysis was performed blinded to all clinical data except age and gender, which are considered when performing QRS scoring. QRS scar scoring was calculated following published methods.24
Clinical classification.
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) heart failure classification system was applied to all patients with available CXRs.31 For T. cruzi-infected patients, we also assigned a severity classification based on a slight modification of published methods.27,32 An abnormal EKG was defined by the presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB), left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), left posterior fascicular block (LPFB), left bundle branch block (LBBB), incomplete RBBB, atrioventricular block (AVB), junctional rhythm, multifocal or paired ventricular pre-mature beats, atrial fibrillation or flutter, or bradycardia (< 50/minute). Based on T. cruzi serologic results and EKG and CXR findings, individuals were categorized into four stages: (1) uninfected control: T. cruzi-negative with normal EKG and CXR; (2) stage A: T. cruzi-positive with normal EKG and CXR; (3) stage B: T. cruzi-positive with abnormal EKG findings but normal heart size on two-dimensional (2D) echo or CXR and no signs of congestive heart failure; and (4) stage C: T. cruzi infection with abnormal EKG findings plus indication of increased left ventricular size and/or decreased left ventricular ejection fraction on CXR and/or 2D echo. EKG changes found in stages B and C participants are listed in Supplemental Table 1.
Analysis of serum markers.
Ten serum molecules were measured. TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 were tested using TGFβ1 and TBFβ2 Quantikine ELISAs (TGFβ1 sensitivity = 15.4 pg/mL, interassay coefficient of variation [%CV] = 5.7–8.4; TGFβ2 sensitivity = 7 pg/mL, interassay %CV = 4.3–5.0; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), respectively. CTGF was tested using the Human CTGF “Super-X” Pre-Coated ELISA Kit (sensitivity = 40 pg/mL, %CV < 10; Antigenix, Huntington Station, NY). MMP2 and MMP9 were tested using the Fluorokine MAP Multiplex Human MMP Panel Base Kit (MMP2 sensitivity = 12.6 pg/mL, interassay %CV = 10.0–13.3; MMP9 sensitivity = 13.7 pg/mL, interassay %CV = 9.3–11.7), and TIMP1 was tested using the Human Fluorokine MAP Base Kit, Cardiac Panel B (sensitivity = 5.05 pg/mL, interassay %CV = 7.1–12.6; both from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). BNP was tested using BNP Human ELISA (sensitivity = 1.02 pg/mL, interassay %CV < 15; RayBiotech, Norcross, GA). Mannose Binding Lectin (MBL) was tested using the MBL Human ELISA Kit (sensitivity = 0.41 ng/mL, interassay %CV < 7.4; Hycult Biotech, Plymouth Meeting, PA). Finally, PICP and PIIINP were tested using ELISA kits (sensitivity = 0.50 ng/mL, interassay %CV < 10; Mybiosource, San Diego, CA).
Statistical analysis.
Measured values of each marker were log-transformed. Statistical significance of the differences across all four disease groups was determined by Kruskal–Wallis test. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare pair-wide differences in the median value of each marker between two disease stages. Multinomial logistic regression was used to calculate relative odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of serum marker concentration and QRS scores with disease stage. For regression analysis, marker values were dichotomized at the median value for stage A and treated as binary. Stage A was used as the reference group. Wald's test was used to determine the difference in post-estimation RORs between stages B and C. All models were adjusted for age. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using STATA 12.1 (College Station, TX).
Results
Demographic characteristics, EKG, and CXR findings.
The median age increased significantly with progressive cardiac stage, and females outnumbered males in all groups except stage C (Table 1). QRS duration and cardiothoracic index increased significantly with progressive cardiac stage.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics and EKG and CXR findings
| Uninfected controls (N = 17) | T. cruzi-infected participants | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage A (N = 21) | Stage B (N = 20) | Stage C (N = 27) | ||
| Median age (IQR) | 18 (17–20) | 33 (26–37) | 39 (33–44) | 50 (46–57) |
| Female, n (%) | 12 (71) | 18 (86) | 14 (70) | 12 (44) |
| Heart rate median (IQR)* | 71 (65–77) | 67 (63–71) | 68 (59–74) | 68 (57–81) |
| PR interval median (IQR)† | 153 (150–160) | 155 (148–160) | 157 (129–166) | 182 (151–192) |
| QRS duration median (IQR) | 85 (82–90) | 89 (83–92) | 143 (120–158) | 124 (112–154) |
| CTI median (IQR)‡ | 45.9 (43.1–48.6) | 45.5 (43.0–46.4) | 44.5 (41.6–46.6) | 57.7 (57.1–57.9) |
In beats per minute.
In milliseconds.
Cardiothoracic index (CTI) in percentage.
IQR = interquartile range; PR.
Differences in QRS score and serum protein concentrations by disease stage.
Compared with T. cruzi-negative controls, T. cruzi-infected individuals in stage A had lower concentrations of MMP2 (P = 0.020) and TIMP1 (P = 0.039) and higher concentrations of TGFβ2 (P = 0.008) (Table 2). Of 11 markers considered, 6 markers showed significant differences when all CC severity groups were compared. QRS score (P < 0.001), BNP (P < 0.001), MMP2 (P < 0.001), and TIMP1 (P < 0.001) were higher among those in stage C compared with those in stage A. TGFβ1 (P = 0.003) and TGFβ2 (P < 0.001) concentrations were significantly higher among those in stage B compared with stage A. Individuals in stage B had higher QRS scores (P = 0.001) and higher concentrations of MMP2 (P = 0.013), TIMP1 (P = 0.003), TGFβ1 (P = 0.023), and TGFβ2 (P < 0.001) compared with those in stage A. Furthermore, individuals in stage C had higher QRS scores compared with those in stage B (P < 0.001), whereas TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 concentrations were significantly lower in those in stage C compared with stage B patients (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively).
Table 2.
Candidate biomarker levels among study participants by severity of CC
| Biomarker | Median (interquartile range) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uninfected controls (n = 17) | T. cruzi-infected participants | P value* | ||||||
| Stage A (n = 21) | Stage B (n = 20) | Stage C (n = 27) | Control vs. A | A vs. B | B vs. C | A vs. C | ||
| QRS score | 3 (0–9) | 0 (0–3) | 6 (3–9) | 15 (9–24) | 0.099 | 0.001 | 0.003 | < 0.001 |
| BNP | 1,183 (640–1,337) | 661 (327–1,586) | 1,289 (1,074–1,903) | 2,845 (2,209–4,007) | 0.849 | 0.183 | 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| MBL | 95,461 (57,354–174,577) | 144,440 (88,698–284,726) | 184,568 (111,405–228,773) | 165,263 (95,924–285,029) | 0.271 | 0.638 | 0.561 | 0.795 |
| MMP2 | 285,349 (213,954–371,903) | 216,859 (192,329–264,988) | 277,556 (234,829–330,336) | 324,623 (296,421–666,490) | 0.020 | 0.013 | 0.089 | < 0.001 |
| MMP9 | 481,996 (332,814–749,818) | 361,305 (239,520–708,749) | 375,039 (197,756–591,389) | 238,169 (117,153–379,862) | 0.202 | 0.375 | 0.204 | 0.045 |
| TIMP1 | 185,370 (137,014–201,683) | 151,800 (131,475–181,649) | 199,684 (170,818–208,972) | 257,752 (183,586–319,857) | 0.039 | 0.003 | 0.102 | < 0.001 |
| PICP | 1,937 (1,110–2,651) | 1,644 (1,354–1,895) | 1,913 (1,591–2,183) | 1,829 (1,343–2,655) | 0.918 | 0.076 | 0.914 | 0.228 |
| PIIINP | 154 (103–333) | 241 (190–715) | 430 (188–615) | 420 (9–843) | 0.297 | 0.794 | 0.738 | 0.975 |
| TGFβ1 | 29,513 (27,935–33,227) | 28,799 (22,881–38,591) | 36,135 (32,247–40,875) | 23,479 (19,455–35,431) | 0.547 | 0.023 | 0.002 | 0.069 |
| TGFβ2 | 458 (348–689) | 687 (554–824) | 1,186 (925–1,327) | 261 (176–413) | 0.008 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Serum biomarker concentrations are in picograms per milliliter.
Logistic regression analysis.
In multinomial logistic regression models, higher QRS scores were associated with stages B (P = 0.005) and C (P = 0.008) compared with stage A (Table 3). Higher concentrations of serum BNP also were associated with stages B (P = 0.018) and C (P = 0.042). Higher concentrations of MMP2 (P = 0.025), TIMP1 (P = 0.016), TGFβ1 (P = 0.011), and TGFβ2 (P = 0.004) were associated with stage B only compared with stage A. The RORs for the association of TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 with stage B compared with stage A were significantly higher than the RORs for the association of these markers with stage C compared with stage A (Wald's P = 0.022 and P = 0.007, respectively).
Table 3.
Multinomial logistic regressions and RORs of biomarker percentile category change
| Median value* | N (%)† | ROR (95% confidence interval) | P value‡ (B vs. C) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage A (N = 21) | Stage B (N = 20) | Stage C (N = 27) | B vs. A | P value | C vs. A | P value | ||
| QRS score | ||||||||
| 0 | 13 (62) | 3 (15) | 2 (8) | 1 | 1 | |||
| > 0 | 8 (38) | 17 (85) | 24§ (92) | 9.78 (2.01, 47.5) | 0.005 | 32.6 (2.52, 421) | 0.008 | 0.349 |
| BNP | ||||||||
| ≤ 661 | 11 (52) | 3 (15) | 1 (4) | 1 | 1 | |||
| > 661 | 10 (48) | 17 (85) | 26 (96) | 6.50 (1.38, 30.6) | 0.018 | 11.9 (1.09, 129) | 0.042 | 0.631 |
| MMP2 | ||||||||
| ≤ 216 | 11 (52) | 4 (20) | 4 (15) | 1 | 1 | |||
| > 216 | 10 (48) | 16 (80) | 23 (85) | 5.38 (1.23, 23.5) | 0.025 | 5.09 (0.85, 30.5) | 0.075 | 0.951 |
| MMP9 | ||||||||
| ≤ 361 | 11 (52) | 9 (45) | 18 (67) | 1 | 1 | |||
| > 361 | 10 (48) | 11 (55) | 9 (33) | 1.41 (0.39, 5.06) | 0.602 | 0.89 (0.19, 4.24) | 0.891 | 0.535 |
| TIMP1 | ||||||||
| ≤ 151 | 11 (52) | 2 (10) | 3 (11) | 1 | 1 | |||
| > 151 | 10 (48) | 18 (90) | 24 (89) | 8.34 (1.49, 46.6) | 0.016 | 1.94 (0.28, 13.5) | 0.504 | 0.198 |
| TGFβ1 | ||||||||
| ≤ 28 | 11 (52) | 3 (15) | 18 (67) | 1 | 1 | |||
| > 28 | 10 (48) | 17 (85) | 9 (33) | 7.91 (1.61, 39.0) | 0.011 | 1.15 (0.22, 5.95) | 0.864 | 0.022 |
| TGFβ2 | ||||||||
| ≤ 687 | 11 (52) | 3 (15) | 18 (67) | 1 | 1 | |||
| > 687 | 10 (48) | 17 (85) | 9 (33) | 30.3 (2.92, 314) | 0.004 | 1.28 (0.24, 6.97) | 0.773 | 0.007 |
All median values are in picograms per milliliter except for QRS score.
The number and percentage of participants with biomarker values less than or equal to and greater than the median value for stage A.
P value comparing the difference in the ROR for the association of each biomarker with stage B versus stage C.
QRS score was not calculable for one patient with a ventricular pacemaker.
Stage A is the referent for all analyses.
Discussion
The most feared consequence of T. cruzi infection is CC, which is estimated to occur in 20–30% of infected individuals.6,8 The current norms of the Bolivian national program include antitrypanosomal treatment only up to age 15 years. However, the impetus for adult treatment has grown in the last decade because of patient demand and data suggesting that treatment, even in patients with early cardiac morbidity, decreases CC progression and possibly, mortality.33–35 A clinical trial is currently underway to assess benznidazole efficacy to prevent or slow progression in adults with early signs of CC.36 However, in the absence of an effective algorithm to prioritize those at high risk of progression to CC, adult treatment will remain beyond the resources of poorer countries. With the goal of identifying preliminary markers to identify individuals at risk of progression to CC, this study evaluated the association of 10 serum markers and the QRS scar score with presence and severity of CC. We found that there were higher concentrations of MMP2, TIMP1, TGFβ1, and TGFβ2 in T. cruzi-positive individuals with early cardiac structural changes (stage B) compared with those with normal EKGs (stage A). MMP2, TIMP1, QRS score, and BNP were also higher in patients with late-stage disease compared with those with early or no cardiac findings.
This study found that QRS score was associated with specific CC disease stage, which is consistent with the progressive fibrosing myocarditis that is the main pathological finding in CC.9 Focal myocarditis is found even in early stages and intensifies as the disease progresses. The loss of cardiomyocytes and substitution of fibrotic tissue induce disruption of muscle fibers, which leads to dysfunction of cardiac muscle tissue and conduction pathways. This pathophysiology explains the tendency of Chagas disease patients to develop heart failure, conduction system defects, and ventricular arrhythmias.9,37 QRS scar score may, therefore, be useful as a yardstick to differentiate between serum markers that indicate existing structural abnormalities and those that may suggest future cardiac disease. BNP and QRS scar score both increased across cardiac severity groups.11 These two markers may simply represent the amount of cardiac damage that has already occurred.
We found lower MMP2 and TIMP1 among those with stage A disease compared with the uninfected control group followed by increasingly elevated levels in stages B and C. The higher levels seen in those with heart disease may reflect cardiac remodeling occurring in response to inflammatory damage to heart tissue.38,39 However, longitudinal follow-up will be necessary to determine if these serum proteins have predictive value.
TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 concentrations were highest among those individuals with stage B disease. TGFβ1 has been independently associated with hospitalization and mortality caused by heart failure or arrhythmias in patients with CC,40 but TGFβ2 has not been widely studied. TGFβ is an important regulator of inflammation, acting as a suppressor at high concentrations.15–17 TGFβ has been identified as acting at several points in the T. cruzi lifecycle and pathogenesis of CC.15 The TGFβ signaling pathway is involved in parasite invasion into mammalian cells and the transformation of intracellular amastigotes into trypomastigotes, and there is evidence suggesting that the parasite causes up-regulation of the pathway.15 At the time of transformation, blocking TGFβ signaling enhances parasite apoptosis, suggesting a parasite-protective role for TGFβ.41 These effects operate during the earlier stages of T. cruzi infection and may explain the elevation seen in stage B. In the chronic phase, TGFβ is involved in cardiac fibrosis.15 However, TGFβ plays a similar role in other cardiac fibrotic conditions and is not specific to T. cruzi-induced cardiac damage.42 In immunological studies of CC, the phenomenon of immune exhaustion has been reported (seen for inflammatory cytokines such as interferon-γ) and may possibly explain the decrease in TGFβ levels from stage B to C.43 In previously published human data, TGFβ levels rose from the asymptomatic category to the category for mild CC but fell slightly from the mild to the more severe class of CC.18
This study had several limitations. First, the lack of an uninfected group with heart disease precluded evaluation of the specificity of the markers for CC. Because > 90% of adults in the community study site and > 80% of advanced cardiac patients in the hospital study were infected with T. cruzi,27,28 it was difficult to find uninfected patients with heart disease. Second, the relatively small sample size of this study limited the ability to observe differences in marker levels across different disease states. Third and most important, this study was cross-sectional and therefore, cannot address the temporal relationship between marker concentrations and disease outcomes. Future studies to confirm the use of the markers identified in this study will use a longitudinal design to evaluate the predictive ability of each marker for development of CC.
Nevertheless, our data represent a preliminary step in the search for a marker to predict progression from the indeterminate form of Chagas disease to CC. Markers of fibrosis and tissue remodeling (QRS score, BNP, MMP2, and TIMP1) likely indicate advancing cardiac structural change. The elevated concentrations of immunoregulatory markers (TGFβ1 and TGFβ2) among those in stage B show promise as clinically useful indicators of eventual development of CC. This information will be particularly important in the countries where Chagas disease is most prevalent and medical resources are limited.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was made possible through the support and participation of the Eiti Health Sector. Specifically, we are grateful to the Capitan of Gran Kaipapendi Karavaicho, Benito Bartolo, and the mayor of Gutierrez municipality, Angel Bartolo Anduari. The authors thank the staff of Centro de Salud Eiti, Sister Maria Bettinsoli, and Roberto Vargas for facilitation and support. The authors also thank the Camiri Municipal Hospital for the use of their laboratory. For their dedicated work in the field and the laboratory, the authors thank Maribel Suxo, Hilsen Roncales, Nazaret Bozo Escalera, Luis Miguel Balderas Lopez, Viviana Coya Loayza, Evelin Coromechi, Bernardo Salvador, Victor Delgado, Liz Diana Pereira Arias, Verónica Hilario Castillo, Hilda Marina Lopez Chacon, Edith Rocha Coca, Martha Olivia Delgadillo, Persida Venette Sanchez Delgadillo, Fanny Chilo Direyu, Delia Martha Fellez Gallardo, Yara Iratei Direyu Galvez, Maria Luisa Vedia León, Marioly Montero, Mileidy Galanza Ortega, Margoth Coromechi, and Ricardo Avendaño Sanchez.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Footnotes
Financial support: This work was supported by National Institute of Health (NIH) Grant 5 P50 AI074285, NIH Fogarty Scholars Program Grant R24TW007988, NIH Training Grant in Infectious and Tropical Diseases 5 T35 AI065385, and NIH Global Research Training Grant D43 TW006581. The participation of A.B.F. was supported by NIH-funded “Interdisciplinary Framework in Global Health at Brown University” Grant 5R25TW008102. Support was also provided by the Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the participation of A.M.S. and D.L.M. and specimen processing.
Authors' addresses: Eva H. Clark, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, E-mail: eva.clark@bcm.edu. Morgan A. Marks, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, E-mail: mmarksster@gmail.com. Robert H. Gilman, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, E-mail: gilmanbob@gmail.com. Antonio B. Fernandez, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, E-mail: antoinefernandezt@hotmail.com. Thomas C. Crawford, Department of Cardiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, E-mail: thomcraw@med.umich.edu. Aaron M. Samuels and Diana L. Martin, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, E-mails: iyp2@cdc.gov and hzx3@cdc.gov. Alicia I. Hidron, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, E-mail: aliciahidron@gmail.com. Gerson Galdos-Cardenas, Hospital Universitario Japones, Santa Cruz, Bolivia, E-mail: gersongaldos@gmail.com. Gilberto Silvio Menacho-Mendez, Centro de Salud Eiti, Gutierrez, Bolivia, E-mail: gsmmjovero@gmail.com. Ricardo W. Bozo-Gutierrez, Hospital Municipal Camiri, Camiri, Bolivia, E-mail: ricardobozo_1966@hotmail.com. Caryn Bern, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, E-mail: Caryn.Bern2@ucsf.edu.
References
- 1.Rassi A, Jr, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2010;375:1388–1402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60061-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dias JC. Natural history of Chagas' disease. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1995;65:359–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Maguire JH, Mott KE, Hoff R, Guimaraes A, Franca JT, Almeida de Souza JA, Ramos NB, Sherlock IA. A 3-year follow-up study of Trypanosoma cruzi infection and electrocardiographic abnormalities in a rural community in northeastern Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1982;31:42–47. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1982.31.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Puigbo JJ, Nava Rhode JR, Carcia Barrios H, Gil Yepez C. A 4-year follow-up study of a rural community with endemic Chagas' disease. Bull World Health Organ. 1968;39:341–348. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VM, Di Lorenzo Oliveira C, Antunes AP, Menezes MM, Ianni BM, Nastari L, Fernandes F, Patavino GM, Sachdev V, Capuani L, de Almeida-Neto C, Carrick DM, Wright D, Kavounis K, Goncalez TT, Carneiro-Proietti AB, Custer B, Busch MP, Murphy EL. Ten-year incidence of Chagas cardiomyopathy among asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi-seropositive former blood donors. Circulation. 2013;127:1105–1115. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.123612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rassi A, Jr, Rassi A, Little WC. Chagas' heart disease. Clin Cardiol. 2000;23:883–889. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960231205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ribeiro AL, Sabino EC, Marcolino MS, Salemi VM, Ianni BM, Fernandes F, Nastari L, Antunes A, Menezes M, Oliveira CD, Sachdev V, Carrick DM, Busch MP, Murphy EL. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in Trypanosoma cruzi seropositive and seronegative former blood donors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rassi A, Jr, Rassi A, Rassi SG. Predictors of mortality in chronic Chagas disease: a systematic review of observational studies. Circulation. 2007;115:1101–1108. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.627265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marin-Neto JA, Cunha-Neto E, Maciel BC, Simoes MV. Pathogenesis of chronic Chagas heart disease. Circulation. 2007;115:1109–1123. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.624296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dutra WO, Gollob KJ. Current concepts in immunoregulation and pathology of human Chagas disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:287–292. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3282f88b80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garcia-Alvarez A, Sitges M, Pinazo MJ, Regueiro-Cueva A, Posada E, Poyatos S, Ortiz-Perez JT, Heras M, Azqueta M, Gascon J, Sanz G. Chagas cardiomyopathy: the potential of diastolic dysfunction and brain natriuretic peptide in the early identification of cardiac damage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Altieri P, Brunelli C, Garibaldi S, Nicolino A, Ubaldi S, Spallarossa P, Olivotti L, Rossettin P, Barsotti A, Ghigliotti G. Metalloproteinases 2 and 9 are increased in plasma of patients with heart failure. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003;33:648–656. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li YY, Feng Y, McTiernan CF, Pei W, Moravec CS, Wang P, Rosenblum W, Kormos RL, Feldman AM. Downregulation of matrix metalloproteinases and reduction in collagen damage in the failing human heart after support with left ventricular assist devices. Circulation. 2001;104:1147–1152. doi: 10.1161/hc3501.095215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Spinale FG. Myocardial matrix remodeling and the matrix metalloproteinases: influence on cardiac form and function. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:1285–1342. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00012.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Araujo-Jorge TC, Waghabi MC, Soeiro Mde N, Keramidas M, Bailly S, Feige JJ. Pivotal role for TGF-beta in infectious heart disease: the case of Trypanosoma cruzi infection and consequent Chagasic myocardiopathy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008;19:405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Waghabi MC, Keramidas M, Feige JJ, Araujo-Jorge TC, Bailly S. Activation of transforming growth factor beta by Trypanosoma cruzi. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:511–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Annes JP, Munger JS, Rifkin DB. Making sense of latent TGFbeta activation. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:217–224. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Araujo-Jorge TC, Waghabi MC, Hasslocher-Moreno AM, Xavier SS, Higuchi Mde L, Keramidas M, Bailly S, Feige JJ. Implication of transforming growth factor-beta1 in Chagas disease myocardiopathy. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:1823–1828. doi: 10.1086/345882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grotendorst GR. Connective tissue growth factor: a mediator of TGF-beta action on fibroblasts. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1997;8:171–179. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6101(97)00010-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kemp TJ, Aggeli IK, Sugden PH, Clerk A. Phenylephrine and endothelin-1 upregulate connective tissue growth factor in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004;37:603–606. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2004.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Koitabashi N, Arai M, Niwano K, Watanabe A, Endoh M, Suguta M, Yokoyama T, Tada H, Toyama T, Adachi H, Naito S, Oshima S, Nishida T, Kubota S, Takigawa M, Kurabayashi M. Plasma connective tissue growth factor is a novel potential biomarker of cardiac dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008;10:373–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Querejeta R, Varo N, Lopez B, Larman M, Artinano E, Etayo JC, Martinez Ubago JL, Gutierrez-Stampa M, Emparanza JI, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Mindan JP, Diez J. Serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I is a marker of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease. Circulation. 2000;101:1729–1735. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.14.1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Castro-Sesquen YE, Gilman RH, Paico H, Yauri V, Angulo N, Ccopa F, Bern C. Cell death and serum markers of collagen metabolism during cardiac remodeling in Cavia porcellus experimentally infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e1996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Loring Z, Chelliah S, Selvester RH, Wagner G, Strauss DG. A detailed guide for quantification of myocardial scar with the Selvester QRS score in the presence of electrocardiogram confounders. J Electrocardiol. 2011;44:544–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2011.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Strauss DG, Selvester RH. The QRS complex–a biomarker that “images” the heart: QRS scores to quantify myocardial scar in the presence of normal and abnormal ventricular conduction. J Electrocardiol. 2009;42:85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Strauss DG, Cardoso S, Lima JA, Rochitte CE, Wu KC. ECG scar quantification correlates with cardiac magnetic resonance scar size and prognostic factors in Chagas' disease. Heart. 2011;97:357–361. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.210047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hidron A, Gilman R, Justiniano J, Blackstock A, LaFuente C, Selum W, Calderon M, Verastegi M, Ferrufino L, Valencia E, Tornheim J, O'Neal S, Comer R, Galdos-Cardenas G, Bern C. Chagas cardiomyopathy in the context of the chronic disease transition. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Samuels AM, Clark EH, Galdos-Cardenas G, Wiegand RE, Ferrufino L, Menacho S, Gil J, Spicer J, Budde J, Levy MZ, Bozo RW, Gilman RH, Bern C. Epidemiology of and impact of insecticide spraying on Chagas disease in communities in the Bolivian Chaco. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gurtler RE. Sustainability of vector control strategies in the Gran Chaco Region: current challenges and possible approaches. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104((Suppl 1)):52–59. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000900009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.WHO Expert Committee . Control of Chagas Disease. Brasilia, Brazil: World Health Organization; 2002. pp. 1–109. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hunt SA. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:e1–e82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Acquatella H. Echocardiography in Chagas heart disease. Circulation. 2007;115:1124–1131. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.627323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bern C. Antitrypanosomal therapy for chronic Chagas' disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2527–2534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct1014204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bern C, Montgomery SP, Herwaldt BL, Rassi A, Jr, Marin-Neto JA, Dantas RO, Maguire JH, Acquatella H, Morillo C, Kirchhoff LV, Gilman RH, Reyes PA, Salvatella R, Moore AC. Evaluation and treatment of Chagas disease in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:2171–2181. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Viotti R, Vigliano C, Lococo B, Bertocchi G, Petti M, Alvarez MG, Postan M, Armenti A. Long-term cardiac outcomes of treating chronic Chagas disease with benznidazole versus no treatment: a nonrandomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:724–734. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Marin-Neto JA, Rassi A, Jr, Avezum A, Jr, Mattos AC, Rassi A, Morillo CA, Sosa-Estani S, Yusuf S. The BENEFIT trial: testing the hypothesis that trypanocidal therapy is beneficial for patients with chronic Chagas heart disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104((Suppl 1)):319–324. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000900042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bogliolo L. Anatomic causes of heart failure in chronic Chagas cardiopathy (myocarditis) studied comparatively with the anatomic causes of heart failure in other cardiopathies. II. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1976;29:479–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fares RC, Gomes Jde A, Garzoni LR, Waghabi MC, Saraiva RM, Medeiros NI, Oliveira-Prado R, Sangenis LH, Chambela Mda C, de Araujo FF, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Damasio MP, Valente VA, Ferreira KS, Sousa GR, Rocha MO, Correa-Oliveira R. Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 are differentially expressed in patients with indeterminate and cardiac clinical forms of Chagas disease. Infect Immun. 2013;81:3600–3608. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00153-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bautista-Lopez NL, Morillo CA, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Quiroz R, Luengas C, Silva SY, Galipeau J, Lalu MM, Schulz R. Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 as diagnostic markers in the progression to Chagas cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2013;165:558–566. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Saraiva RM, Waghabi MC, Vilela MF, Madeira FS, Sperandio da Silva GM, Xavier SS, Feige JJ, Hasslocher-Moreno AM, Araujo-Jorge TC. Predictive value of transforming growth factor-beta1in Chagas disease: towards a biomarker surrogate of clinical outcome. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013;107:518–525. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trt050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.de Oliveira FL, Araujo-Jorge TC, de Souza EM, de Oliveira GM, Degrave WM, Feige JJ, Bailly S, Waghabi MC. Oral administration of GW788388, an inhibitor of transforming growth factor beta signaling, prevents heart fibrosis in Chagas disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 42.Dobaczewski M, Chen W, Frangogiannis NG. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta signaling in cardiac remodeling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51:600–606. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Laucella SA, Postan M, Martin D, Hubby Fralish B, Albareda MC, Alvarez MG, Lococo B, Barbieri G, Viotti RJ, Tarleton RL. Frequency of interferon-gamma-producing T cells specific for Trypanosoma cruzi inversely correlates with disease severity in chronic human Chagas disease. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:909–918. doi: 10.1086/381682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.