Abstract
To understand the early signaling steps in the response of plant cells to increased environmental temperature, 2-D difference gel electrophoresis was used to study the proteins in microsomes of Arabidopsis seedlings that are regulated early during heat stress. Using mass spectrometry, 19 microsomal proteins that showed an altered expression level within 5 min after heat treatment were identified. Among these proteins, annexin 1 (AtANN1) was one of those up-regulated rapidly after heat-shock treatment. Functional studies show loss-of-function mutants for AtANN1 and its close homolog AtANN2 were more sensitive to heat-shock treatment, whereas plants overexpressing AtANN1 showed more resistance to this treatment. Correspondingly, the heat-induced expression of heat-shock proteins and heat-shock factors is inhibited in ann1/ann2 double mutant, and the heat-activated increase in cytoplasmic calcium concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) is greatly impaired in the ann1 mutant and almost undetectable in ann1/ann2 double mutant. Taken together these results suggest that AtANN1 is important in regulating the heat-induced increase in [Ca2+]cyt and in the response of Arabidopsis seedlings to heat stress.
Temperatures above the optimum are sensed as heat stress (HS)1 by all living organisms. When exposed to high temperature, plants have sophisticated mechanisms to maintain cellular homeostasis and minimize cell damage. Heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) mediate gene expression changes leading to the production of heat shock proteins (HSPs) that confer thermotolerance to plants (1, 2, 3). In recent years, there has been considerable progress in identifying the signaling steps that enable plants to respond to heat stress at the molecular level. These include: activation of bZIP transcription factors by heat-induced proteolytic cleavage (4); inhibition of transgene-induced post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) by SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3) (5); accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by RBOHD activation (6); and reduced H2A.Z occupancy in nucleosomes of heat-regulated genes, which would be expected to stimulate transcription of these genes (7).
Many reports also provide evidence that membrane-localized calcium channels can act as sensors for increased temperature in plant cells (8, 9). The increase in cytosolic calcium concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) caused by calcium influx from the extracellular matrix is an early critical step in the HS signal transduction pathway (10). In responding to this calcium influx, calcium-binding proteins such as calmodulin and calcium dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are activated. Calmodulin binds to a calmodulin-binding protein kinase, which in turn, activates heat-regulated changes in gene expression by phosphorylating HSF (11, 12, 13). CDPKs, on the other hand, might regulate plant heat-shock responses by activating multiple mitogen-activated protein kinases (14).
Despite considerable progress in studying the mechanisms of heat-shock signal transduction, our understanding of the heat signal perception and early signaling transduction mechanism is still very limited. Therefore, identifying novel proteins that regulate early heat-shock responses should help decoding high-temperature sensing and responding mechanism in planta. Along with advances in genome sequencing, new proteomic technologies have now emerged as an important tool in studying signal transduction mechanisms (15). Compared with traditional genetic studies, which rely on phenotypes caused by altering gene activity, proteomics not only provides real-time monitoring of abundance changes of certain proteins during cell and tissue responses to stimuli, but also reveals their mechanisms of function and regulation, such as post-translational modifications and protein–protein interaction. In this study, we used the two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) technology to find microsome-associated proteins whose level changes rapidly after heat-shock, and identified a set of membrane proteins that change abundance in response to a five-minute heat treatment. Among these proteins was annexin 1 (AtANN1), and here we demonstrate that this protein plays a key role in plant heat-stress responses by mediating a heat-induced increase in [Ca2+]cyt.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Plant Materials and Heat Shock Treatment
Arabidopsis thaliana seeds were surface sterilized using 75% (v/v) ethanol and sowed in glass plates containing 25 ml growth medium containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog (1/2 MS) salt, 1.5% (w/v) sucrose, and 0.8% (w/v) agar. Plates were stratified at 4 °C in darkness for 3 days. Seedlings were allowed to grow at 22 °C under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) for 1 week. For heat shock treatment, the glass plates were wrapped with general kitchen plastic wrap and submerged in a water bath at the indicated temperature for different periods. The seedlings were returned to 22 °C under long-day to recover for 1 week before taking pictures for analysis. All the data showed in this study has been performed at least three times with similar results. Representative data from one repetition are shown in the figures.
2D-DIGE Protein Sample Preparation
Because we were interested in finding heat shock-regulated proteins whose level changed rapidly, we used a water bath for our heat shock proteomic studies to make sure all the seedlings were instantly subjected to similar temperature at same time. To prepare the seedlings for 2D-DIGE protein sample extraction, Arabidopsis seedlings were grown in liquid medium containing 1/2 MS salt and 1.5% (w/v) sucrose under long day at 22 °C for 1 week. To avoid a nutrient shock effect, half of the old medium was transferred into a new container and incubated at 37 °C in the water bath, whereas the other half of the medium was kept at 22 °C with the seedlings. When the temperature of the water bath medium reached 37 °C, half of the seedlings were transferred into the medium to initiate the heat shock treatment. After heat shock treatment for 5 min, seedlings were harvested by filtering through a nylon mesh, quick tap-dried with tissue paper and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Microsomal proteins were extracted as described previously (16), and dissolved in DIGE buffer (7 m urea, 2 m thiourea, 4% CHAPS) at a concentration around 5–10 μg/μl.
2D-DIGE Procedure and Image Analysis
Protein for 2D-DIGE analysis was labeled with CyDyeTM DIGE fluor minimal labeling kit (GE Healthcare). In brief, 10 μl microsomal protein from control or heat treated sample was mixed with 0.25 μl of Tris-HCl (1.5 m, pH 8.8) and 0.5 μl of 100 nm Cy3 or Cy5, respectively, and incubated in darkness at 4 °C for 2 h. The reaction was terminated by adding 1 μl 10 mm lysine and incubating with the protein on ice for 10 min. The Cy3- and Cy5- labeled pair of control and heat treated samples were combined, and to the mix was added 9 μl of 1 m DTT, 4.5 μl of IPG buffer, pH 4–7. One hundred-micrograms of unlabeled protein each from control and heat-treated samples was then added to make the total protein amount in the mixture around 300 μg. The DIGE buffer was used to adjust the final volume to 450 μl for separation by isoelectric focusing (IEF) using 24 cm Immobiline Dry Strips, pH 4–7. Two-dimensional electrophoresis was performed according to (16). DIGE images were acquired using a Typhoon trio scanner (GE healthcare). At least six biological repeats were performed, and labeling of two pairs of biological repeat samples was swapped to avoid identifying proteins that are preferentially labeled by a specific CyDye. Spots that showed consistent heat shock regulated changes in at least five biological repeat samples were picked using a robotic spot picker (GE healthcare).
Protein In-gel Digestion and Mass Spectrometry Identification
Protein in-gel digestion was performed as described previously (17). Extracted peptides in 0.1% formic acid were separated using a 100 μm ×150 mm C18 reverse phase column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a flow rate of 350 nl/min, and eluted using a linear acetonitrile (ACN) gradient (0–45%) with 0.1% formic acid over 60 min using a nano-LC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Eluted peptides were electrosprayed directly into a LTQ-XL linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using an uncoated 15 μm inner diameter spraying needle with 2.1 kV electrospray voltage at 220 °C. Peptides were analyzed in positive ion mode with m/z range between 400 and 2000. Charged peaks over 1000 counts were selected for collision induced dissociation (CID) with 35% normalized collision energy and activation Q value was set to 0.25. The dynamic exclusion activation time was set to 30 s to prevent same m/z ions from being selected after its acquisition. CID product ions were analyzed on the linear ion trap in centroid mode.
Complete LC-MS/MS peak lists were searched against database generated from Arabidopsis subset of the NCBInr database (date 12/12/2012, 257,035 entries searched), using the SEQUEST search algorithm, which is part of the BioWorks 3.3.1 data analysis software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptide mass range was set to 400–5000 amu. The precursor ions' tolerance and fragment ions' tolerance were set to 2.00 amu and 1.00 amu, respectively. Enzymatic digestion was specified as trypsin, with a maximum of two missed cleavages allowed. Cysteine carbamidomethylation was allowed as fixed modifications, and methionine oxidation were allowed as variable modification. Search result option filter was set as the following: Delta CN ≥ 0.1; Xcorr (±1, 2, 3) = 1.75, 2.5, 3.0; peptide probability≤0.01.
Isolation of Annexin T-DNA Mutants
T-DNA insertional mutant for AtANN1 (SALK_132169, SAIK_414_C01, WiscDsLox477–480P11), AtANN2 (SALK_054223) and AtANN6 (SALK_112492) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (http://www.arabidopsis.org), and are all in Columbia (Col-0) background. The identified ann1–2 mutant was used to cross with ann2 mutant. F3 segregated ann1–2/ann2 double homozygous mutant were used for heat stress tolerance analysis. The gene specific primers used for genotyping the mutants were: 5′-gcctgcttcagcttttgtatg-3′ (left) and 5′-aacgctaccgacacaacattc-3′ (right) for SALK_132169; 5′-tgctccttctgatgatgctg-3′ (left) and 5′-ccaataaagcatcacgctca-3′ (right) for SAIL_414_C01; 5′-tggactcttgatccaccaga-3′ (left) and 5′-gagcaacaagcatgtcctca-3′ (right) for SALK_054223; 5′-ggcgtctctcaaaattccag-3′ (left) and 5′-caccagaaagctctccgtct-3′ (right) for SALK_112492. The transcript abundance of AtANN1 and AtANN2 in wild type and mutant seedlings was determined by semi-quantitative Reverse transcription PCR using 5′-atggcgactcttaaggtttc-3′ (left) and 5′-agcatcatcttcaccgagaag-3′ (right) for AtANN1 and gene specific genotyping primer set for SALK_054223 and SALK_112492.
Plasmid Construction and Transformation
Full-length CDS of AtANN1 were amplified by PCR, cloned into pENTR/SD/D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen), and subcloned into Gateway compatible binary vector pEarleyGate 100 by LR clonase (Invitrogen). The construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by electroporation and transformed into Arabidopsis (Col-0 ecotype) by the floral dipping method. Transgenic plants were selected by spraying plants with 5 μg/ml Basta (Finale). All transgenic lines used in this study are single insertional homozygous T3 lines.
Expression Analysis of HSFs and HSPs by RT-PCR and Western Blot
Wild type and ann1–2/ann2 double mutant seedlings were grown in the same glass plates containing 15 ml growth medium (1/2 MS salt, 1.5% sucrose, and 0.8% agar) for 1 week at 22 °C under long-day condition. For heat shock treatment, the plates were placed into a growth chamber with temperature set at 37 °C. Seedlings were harvested at different time intervals and frozen in liquid nitrogen. For RT-PCR analysis of the expression level of various HSFs transcript, total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using ExScriptTM RT reagent kit (Takara) according to manufacturer's instruction. Primer pairs used for RT-PCR analysis were: 5′-atgatgaacccgtttctcccggaag-3′ and 5′-ggaggtggaagccaaactctcatcac-3′ for HSF A7A; 5′-atggaagaactgaaagtggaaat-3′ and 5′-aggttccgaaccaagaaaacccatt-3′ for HSF A2; 5′-atgacggctgtgacggcggcgcaaag-3′ and 5′-gttgcagactttgctgcttttccac-3′ for HSF B1; 5′-acagatttcgctaaagatttgctt-3′ and 5′-cgcttcttcttcttcttcaatctc-3′ for HSF B2A. For protein abundance analysis of HSPs, frozen tissues were ground into fine powder in liquid nitrogen, boiled with 2× SDS sampling buffer, loaded onto SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. Membrane was probed with different antibodies specifically against various HSPs (Agrisera, Vännäs, Sweden) and detected with SuperSignal West Dura Chemiluminescence System (Pierce).
Ca2+ Measurement Using Aequorin
Aequorin luminescence measurement was performed according to (18), with slight modifications. Transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings expressing cytosolic 35S::Aequorin were grown in 1/2 MS salt containing medium for 10 days under long day at 22 °C. Seedlings (n ≥ 15 per treatment) were transferred to a 96-well plate and incubated in dark with a calcium-measurement buffer (0.1 mm KCl, 1 mm CaCl2, 10 mm MES, 5 μm coelenterazine-h) at 22 °C for 6 h. The seedlings were quick rinsed two times with the calcium-measurement buffer, 100 μl 22 °C (control) or 37 °C (heat shock) calcium measurement buffer was quickly added to each well, and the plate was loaded into a microplate luminometer (Centro LB 960, Berthold, Oak Ridge, TN) that is at room temperature (control) or has been prewarmed to 37 °C (heat shock). Aequorin luminescence signal in each well was recorded for 0.5 s every 30 s. After 45 counts, 100 μl reconstitution solution (2 m CaCl2, 20% ethanol) was injected and luminescence signal in each well was recorded for 10 more cycles, 0.5 s each. Percentage reconstitution value was calculated by dividing the luminescence signal recorded at each time point by the highest reconstitution luminescence value recorded in each well, respectively, for wild type, ann1 and ann1/2 mutants. Relative aequorin signal is calculated by dividing percentage reconstitution value collected at 37 °C by percentage reconstitution value collected at 22 °C.
Determination of Total Ca2+ in Plant Tissues
Fifty seven-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings grown in 1/2 MS medium supplied with 1% sucrose were grouped as one sample and oven dried at 65 °C overnight. After recording the dry weights, the dried plants were digested with 5 ml HNO3 at 100 °C for 4 h. The digested mixture was transferred to a volumetric flask, and diluted precisely to 100 ml with double distilled water. Total plant Ca2+ concentration was determined with a flame atomic absorption spectrophotomer (Model AA-240Z, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).
RESULTS
The Effect of HS Temperature and Duration on the Survival of Arabidopsis Seedlings
Increased environmental temperature triggers heat-shock responses (HSR) in plants; however, if the temperature rises above a certain limit, or the duration of the high temperature is too long, plants will not be able to survive. To study the HS response of plant cells, the treatment used should be strong enough to stimulate the HSR, but at the same time mild enough not to kill the plant. In order to find a proper heat-shock treatment condition for our proteomic studies, plates containing one-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings were treated at a range of temperatures and treatment durations, and post-treatment survival rates were calculated after the seedlings recovered at 22 °C for 1 week. Treatment of Arabidopsis seedlings in a 42 °C water bath up to 10 min did not induce irreversible damage to seedlings, whereas treatment with a 42 °C water bath for 30 min killed almost all of the seedlings. In comparison, seedlings treated with a 37 °C water bath for 30 min survived (Fig. 1). As 37 °C has been previously shown to induce HSR (9, 11, 12), a 37 °C water bath was used as our treatment temperature during the following proteomic studies.
Identification of Microsomal Proteins Whose Level Changes Rapidly After Heat Shock
Heat shock stimulates a rapid increase of the [Ca2+]cyt. This increase can be seen as early as 1 min after heat treatment, and reaches the maximum around 5 mins (11). In order to study the early cellular responses stimulated by HS, we exposed one-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings to 37 °C for 5 mins and harvested them for 2D-DIGE analysis.
Protein samples from control and treated seedlings were analyzed in at least six biological-repeat experiments. In average, over 1500 protein spots were detected in each gel (Fig. 2A). Examination of the DIGE images identified over 49 spots that showed consistent abundance changes induced by heat shock. Surprisingly, the abundance of most spots was increased by heat treatment, and only a few showed decreased levels. These spots of interest were picked, digested in gel by trypsin and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. A total of 27 heat-shock-regulated protein spots, which represented 19 unique proteins, were successfully identified (Table I). Functional classification showed these proteins are involved in processes such as hormone biosynthesis, protein translation, calcium signaling, cellular metabolism, and protein folding (chaperone).
Table I. Early heat-regulated microsomal proteins identified by mass spectrometry. The heat regulated abundance changes were observed from at least five biological repeats. For MS/MS identification, number of unique peptides, sequence coverage of the identified proteins and the best matched scores are listed.
Spots | Accession number | Protein name | Unique peptides | Coverage (%) | Abundance change by HS | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hormone biosynthesis | ||||||
2586 | At2g46370 | Jasmonate-amido synthetase | 3 | 6.26 | up | 30.19 |
3984 | At1g62380 | ACC oxidase 2 | 8 | 32.81 | up | 70.28 |
4095 | At3g44310 | Nitrilase 1 | 9 | 37.28 | down | 100.28 |
4125 | At3g44310 | Nitrilase 1 | 12 | 50 | down | 130.29 |
4285 | At3g44310 | Nitrilase 1 | 6 | 25.72 | down | 70.27 |
Protein translation | ||||||
3384 | At1g57720 | Translation elongation factor EF1B | 5 | 12.35 | up | 50.23 |
3394 | At1g57720 | Translation elongation factor EF1B | 4 | 15.5 | down | 50.24 |
3421 | At1g57720 | Translation elongation factor EF1B | 10 | 26.63 | up | 170.29 |
3415 | At3g13920 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A-1 | 7 | 28.16 | up | 100.31 |
3424 | At3g13920 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A-1 | 8 | 34.22 | down | 120.32 |
3804 | At4g20360 | GTP binding Elongation factor Tu family protein | 9 | 27.73 | up | 80.31 |
Calcium signaling | ||||||
4181 | At1g35720 | Annexin 1 | 2 | 6.308 | up | 40.24 |
4191 | At1g35720 | Annexin 1 | 5 | 15.77 | up | 70.28 |
Protein folding | ||||||
2371 | At5g42020 | Luminal binding protein (BIP2) | 3 | 4.8 | up | 30.19 |
2407 | At5g42020 | Luminal binding protein (BIP2) | 6 | 11.98 | up | 50.24 |
6119 | At3g62030 | Cyclophilin 20–3 (CYP20–3) | 5 | 24.52 | up | 50.25 |
Metabolism | ||||||
1969 | At1g08520 | CHLD subunit of the Mg-chelatase enzyme | 16 | 25.58 | up | 160.23 |
3874 | At1g73110 | Nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase | 14 | 40.05 | up | 170.27 |
4097 | At2g05830 | 5-methylthioribose-1-phosphate isomerase | 7 | 25.67 | up | 80.24 |
4113 | At5g15650 | AtRGP2 | 4 | 11.67 | up | 40.23 |
4809 | At2g34470 | Urease accessory protein G (UREG) | 5 | 26.55 | up | 50.31 |
5092 | At4g30530 | Gamma-glutamyl peptidase | 3 | 17.60 | up | 30.26 |
5128 | At3g02780 | Isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase 2 | 5 | 19.01 | up | 50.28 |
5116 | At3g11930 | Adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases like | 2 | 11.5 | up | 20.19 |
Others | ||||||
2060 | At1g33790 | Jacalin lectin family protein | 4 | 11.69 | up | 40.17 |
2062 | At1g33790 | Jacalin lectin family protein | 14 | 36.85 | up | 120.31 |
4734 | At4g39090 | Cysteine proteinases | 3 | 9.24 | down | 30.22 |
Annexin 1 is Essential for Plant Resistance to Heat-Shock Treatment
Of all the microsomal proteins identified in Table I, we chose to further study AtANN1 (Fig. 2B), because of prior evidence showing that it could play a major role in mediating plant stress responses. Using polyclonal antibody raised specific against a 31 amino acid sequence from AtANN1 (amino acids 200–231) (19), we confirmed the 2D-DIGE result in which AtANN1 protein levels increased in the microsomal fraction after 5 mins of HS (Fig. 2C). We then isolated Transfer DNA (T-DNA) insertion mutants of AtANN1 gene to investigate if AtANN1 plays a significant role in HS responses in Arabidopsis. We obtained three insertion mutants for AtANN1, and these alleles were named as ann1–1 (SalK_132169), ann1–2 (Sail_414_C01), and ann1–3 (WiscDsLox477–480P11; Fig. 3A). The T-DNA insertion sites in these alleles were located at the 5′ UTR of the AtANN1 gene (ann1–1) or within different positions of its second and third exon (ann1–2 and ann1–3), respectively (Fig. 3A). Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of these T-DNA mutants showed that the expression of AtANN1 in ann1–2 and ann1–3 is not detectable, whereas the expression of AtANN1 in ann1–1 was not affected (Fig. 3B). We then compared the basal thermotolerance of these T-DNA insertional mutants with wild-type seedlings. One-week-old seedlings were subjected to 45 °C water bath for 13 min, and then allowed to recover at 22 °C for another week before they were photographed and calculate their survival rate. Consistent with the expression of endogenous AtANN1 level, ann1–2 and ann1–3 seedlings were hypersensitive to heat-shock treatment, whereas heat sensitivity of ann1–1 seedlings was similar to wild-type plants (Fig. 3C, 3D).
There are eight members of the Arabidopsis annexin gene family. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that AtANN1, AtANN2, and AtANN6 are all closely related, with AtANN2 and AtANN6 having 75% identity at the amino acid level (20). There is expression and immunolocalization evidence suggesting that AtANN1 and AtANN2 have both distinct and overlapping functions in Arabidopsis (21, 22). To investigate if other annexins also participate in plant HS responses, we isolated T-DNA insertion mutants for AtANN2 and AtANN6 and tested basal thermotolerance of the mutant seedlings (Fig. 4A, 4B). The sensitivity of ann2 mutants to heat-shock treatment is higher than wild type but lower than ann1–2 mutants (Fig. 4C). In contrast, knocking out the expression of AtANN6 did not alter the sensitivity of the mutant to heat-shock treatment (Fig. 4C). We then generated an ann1–2/ann2 double mutant by crossing ann2 with ann1–2, and found the ann1–2/ann2 double mutant seedlings were more sensitive to heat stress treatment than the ann1–2 single mutants. These results indicated AtANN1 and AtANN2, but not AtANN6, play redundant roles in regulating plant heat-shock responses.
Heat Stress-Induced Expression of HSF and HSP is Impaired in ann1/2 Mutant
Heat stress-induced expression of HSFs and HSPs plays an important role in the acquisition of thermotolerance by plants. To investigate whether the susceptibility of annexin mutants to heat stress is related to the level of endogenous HSFs and HSPs, the heat-induced expression of different HSFs and HSPs were analyzed in seedlings of wild type and ann1–2/ann2 double mutants. Under normal conditions, expression of HSFs is either not detected or at a similar level in both wild type and ann1–2/ann2 double mutants. Thirty minutes of heat shock induces a dramatic increase of HSFs expression in wild-type seedlings. In comparison, the increase in expression of HSFs in ann1–2/ann2 double mutants is much smaller (Fig. 5A). Similar results were observed for the expression of HSPs. Before heat-shock treatment, the protein levels of the HSP70, HSP90, and HSP17.7 in ann1–2/ann2 double mutants were similar to wild type. After heat shock at 37 °C for 3 h, the protein abundance of these three proteins in wild-type seedlings was significantly higher than in those of the ann1–2/ann2 mutants (Fig. 5B). The reduced expression of HSFs and HSPs in ann1–2/ann2 mutants after heat treatment suggests annexin is required for the early changes in gene expression induced by heat shock.
Plants Overexpressing AtANN1 are more Resistant to Heat-Shock Treatment
To further confirm the function of annexin in plants' heat-shock response, we overexpressed AtANN1 in ann1–2 mutant background. RT-PCR analysis confirmed that the expression level of AtANN1 in two transgenic lines, OX-1 and OX-2, were both higher than in wild type. Seedlings overexpressing AtANN1 were more resistant to heat-shock treatment than wild-type seedlings. The average survival rate of annexin-overexpressing seedlings was 20% higher than wild-type seedlings, and the difference is statistically significant (Fig. 6). This result demonstrates that the expression level of annexin is directly related to the basal thermotolerance of young Arabidopsis seedlings.
Suppressing the Expression of AtANN1 and AtANN2 Inhibits Heat-Shock-Induced Increase in Intracellular Calcium Levels
Prior reports indicated that AtANN1 could function to increase the Ca2+ permeability of plasma membranes during plant stress responses (23, 24). In order to test whether heat-induced calcium transport is altered in AtANN1 loss-of-function mutants, we crossed the ann1–2 and ann1–2/ann2 mutants with transgenic plants expressing 35S::Aequorin (25), F3 segregant lines that were homozygous for 35S::Aequorin/ann1–2 and 35S::Aequorin/ann1–2/ann2 mutants were chosen and used for monitoring heat shock stimulated changes in [Ca2+]cyt. RT-PCR showed the expression of AtANN1 and AtANN2 is not detectable in our 35S::Aequorin expressing ann1–2/ann2 double knockout mutant (Fig. 7A). Measurement of cytosolic calcium concentration showed the highest luminescence signal emitted by reconstituted aequorin is lower in 35S::Aequorin expressing ann1–2 and ann1–2/ann2 mutants (Fig. 7B), which might be caused by the lower total calcium abundance in the seedlings (Fig. 7C). Because there is a difference in the reconstituted luminescence signals observed between wild type and the mutants, we used percentage reconstitution values to determine the relative luminescence in response to heat-shock treatment for wild type and mutants seedlings. As shown in Fig. 7D, in consistent with previous reports (11), heat-shock treatment induced a rapid increase in [Ca2+]cyt within 5 min in wild type, ann1–2, and ann1–2/ann2 mutants. The heat induced [Ca2+]cyt continues to increase in wild type and reaches the highest peak around 12 min. In comparison, this prolonged increase in the heat induced [Ca2+]cyt was diminished in ann1–2 mutant and absent in ann1–2/ann2 double mutant (Fig. 7D). These results suggest that AtANN1 and AtANN2 function is important for the normal heat-induced increase in [Ca2+]cyt in Arabidopsis.
DISCUSSION
The heat-induced rapid increase in [Ca2+]cyt is considered to be an essential step in plant responses to heat stress. Prior reports showed this increase is regulated by plasma membrane-localized cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNGCs) (8, 9) and phospholipase C9 (PLC9) (26), but there may be other calcium channels or membrane-localized proteins involved in regulating this rapid and dynamic change in [Ca2+]cyt in response to HS treatment. Because of prior studies showing that AtANN1 promoted the Ca2+ permeability of plasma membranes, we selected it for further study from the microsomal proteins in Arabidopsis seedlings whose level changed rapidly after heat shock. We found that AtANN1 plays an important role in regulating heat-shock tolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings and that seedlings knocked out in their expression of AtANN1 show impaired calcium influx in response to heat-shock treatment. These results suggest AtANN1 is a new component in regulating heat-shock-induced elevation of intracellular calcium concentration in plant cells.
Annexins bind membranes in a calcium-dependent manner. Although they appear to have diverse functions, it has become clear that certain annexins play important roles in abiotic stress responses (20, 27). For example, ectopic expression of a Brassica annexin in Arabidopsis provides tolerance to drought, salinity and osmotic stress (28), and overexpression of AtANN1 in Arabidopsis increases both drought tolerance in plants (29), and salinity tolerance in seeds (30). There are also previous studies linking annexins to heat-stress responses in plants. For example, a recent proteomic study analyzing heat stress in radish leaves found that the level of an annexin protein increased at 12 h, and then decreased at 24 h in response to 40 °C heat treatment (31). Chu et al. also identified an annexin protein from the embryonic axes of sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) that was up-regulated by heat treatment. Ectopic expression of this lotus annexin in Arabidopsis conferred resistance to heat treatment in seed germination (32). In this study, we discovered that Arabidopsis AtANN1 is an early participant in a plant's response to heat treatment. The increase in abundance of AtANN1 in the microsomal membrane fraction can be observed after only 5 min of heat treatment. Among the eight annexins in the Arabidopsis genome, AtANN1 is the most abundant and appears to be a multifunctional protein (33). We found that knocking out the expression of either endogenous AtANN1 or AtANN2 makes mutants hypersensitive to heat-shock treatment, whereas knocking out the expression AtANN6 does not alter the sensitivity of the mutant, indicating AtANN1 and AtANN2, but not AtANN6, are functionally redundant in regulating plant basal thermotolerance. Correspondingly, Arabidopsis seedlings overexpressing AtANN1 were more resistant to heat stress. Furthermore, heat induced expression of HSFs and HSPs is attenuated in ann1–2/ann2 double mutant. Taken together, these results suggest AtANN1 and AtANN2 are critical components of plants' adaptive responses to environmental heat stress.
There are numerous reports documenting AtANN1 functions as a calcium-permeable channel-like protein in response to abiotic stress, but most of the data was obtained from patch clamp experiments of spheroplasts and protoplasts of root epidermal cells (23, 24, 34). Here, using an aequorin reporting system, we found AtANN1 and AtANN2 play a role in regulating the elevation of [Ca2+]cyt induced by heat shock in whole seedlings. We found that heat-induced change in [Ca2+]cyt was greatly reduced in ann1 mutant and was even lower in ann1–2/ann2 double mutant, which suggests that AtANN1 and AtANN2 are important components of the channel transport system that regulates heat-induced increase in [Ca2+]cyt. However, heat shock still induces a small increase in [Ca2+]cyt in the ann1–2/ann2 double mutant, especially in the first 5 min of heat shock treatment, which might be caused by the function of other proteins that facilitate Ca2+ uptake, such as CNGCs in Arabidopsis. Interestingly, the total calcium concentration in ann1 and ann1/2 mutant seedlings is lower than wild-type control seedlings. However, future studies are needed to determine whether the reduced calcium accumulation is caused by the reduced calcium influx in ann1 and ann1/2 mutants.
In conclusion, we found that the abundance of AtANN1 protein in membranes increased rapidly in response to 5 min heat-shock treatment, and that AtANN1 is critical for plant heat-shock responses. Although it is still unresolved whether AtANN1 acts directly as a calcium-permeable channel in vivo or facilitates this calcium transport by some other mechanism (35, 36, 37), our results strongly suggest that in addition to previously characterized calcium-permeable channels, annexins are a significant component of the molecular machinery that promotes the heat-induced increase in [Ca2+]cyt. However, our data provide no evidence that AtANN1 functions as a heat sensor during plant heat-shock responses. Consequently, we propose that an elevated environmental temperature is first perceived by membrane sensors like CNGCs, which allows for an initial calcium influx into the cytosol. This increased [Ca2+]cyt would activate cytosolic AtANN1, recruiting it directly to membranes. The association of AtANN1 with membranes could then either form a calcium channel by itself or activate another calcium channel to allow more calcium influx into the cell needed to fully activate plant heat-shock responses.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Xiaodong Xu (Hebei Normal University, China) for providing 35S::Aequorin expressing transgenic plants.
This work is dedicated in loving memory of Xu Wang who sadly passed away unexpectedly during this research study.
Footnotes
Author contributions: D.S. and W.T. designed research; X.W., X.M., H.W., and B.L. performed research; G.C., Y.G., and S.R. contributed new reagents or analytic tools; W.T. analyzed data; G.C., S.R., and W.T. wrote the paper.
* This work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of China (2013ZX08009–003-002); “one hundred talents project” of Hebei province (E2012100004 to W.T.); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270357 to Y.G.); and by grants from the National Science Foundation (IOS 0718890 to S.J.R. and G.C.) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX13AM54G to S.J.R. and G.C.).
1 The abbreviations used are:
- CHAPS
- 3-Cholamidopropyl dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate
- HS
- heat stress
- HSFs
- heat shock transcription factors
- HSPs
- heat shock proteins
- AtANN1
- Arabidopsis annexin 1
- CDPKs
- calcium dependent protein kinases
- HSR
- heat-shock responses
- Col-0
- Columbia-0
- CNGC
- cyclic nucleotide-gated channels
- MS medium
- Murashige and Skoog medium
- [Ca2+]cyt
- cytoplasmic calcium concentration
- PLC
- phospholipase C
- ROS
- Reactive oxygen species.
REFERENCES
- 1. Baniwal S. K., Bharti K., Chan K. Y., Fauth M., Ganguli A., Kotak S., Mishra S. K., Nover L., Port M., Scharf K. D., Tripp J., Weber C., Zielinski D., Con Koskull-Doring P. (2004) Heat stress response in plants, a complex game with chaperones and more than twenty heat stress transcription factors. J. Biosci. 29, 471–487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nover L., Bharti K., Doring P., Mishra S. K., Ganguli A., Scharf K. D. (2001) Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world, how many heat stress transcription factors do we need? Cell Stress Chaperones 6, 177–189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Pirkkala L., Nykanen P., Sistonen L. (2001) Roles of the heat shock transcription factors in regulation of the heat shock response and beyond. FASEB J. 15, 1118–1131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Deng Y., Humbert S., Liu J. X., Srivastava R., Rothstein S., Howell S. H. (2011) Heat induces the splicing by IRE1 of a mRNA encoding a transcription factor involved in the unfolded protein response in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 7247–7252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zhong S. H., Liu J. Z., Jin H., Lin L., Li Q., Chen Y., Yuan Y. Z., Wang Z.-Y., Huang H., Qi Y. J., Chen X. Y., Vaucheret H., Chory J., Li J. M., He Z. H. (2013) Warm temperatures induce transgenerational epigenetic release of RNA silencing by inhibiting siRNA biogenesis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 9171–9176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mittler R., Finka A., Goloubinoff P. (2012) How do plants feel the heat? Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 118–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kumar S. V., Wgge P. A. (2010) H2A.Z containing nucleosomes mediate the thermosensory response in Arabidopsis. Cell 140, 136–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Finka A., Cuendet A. F. H., Maathuis F. J. M., Saidi Y., Goloubinoff P. (2012) Plasma membrane cyclic nucleotide gated calcium channels control land plant thermal sensing and acquired thermotolerance. Plant Cell 24, 3333–3348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gao F., Han X. W., Wu J. H., Zheng S. Z., Shang Z. L., Sun D. Y., Zhou R. G., Li B. (2012) A heat activated calcium permeable channel, Arabidopsis cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 6, is involved in heat shock responses. Plant J. 70, 1056–1069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Saidi Y., Finka A., Goloubinoff P. (2010) Heat perception and signaling in plants: a tortuous path to thermotolerance. New Phytol. 190, 556–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Liu H. T., Li B., Shang Z. L., Li X. Z., Mu R. L., Sun D. Y., Zhou R. G. (2003) Calmodulin is involved in heat shock signal transduction in wheat. Plant Physiol. 132, 1186–1195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Liu H. T., Gao F., Li G. L., Han J. L., Liu D. L., Sun D. Y., Zhou R. G. (2008) The calmodulin-binding protein kinase 3 is part of heat shock signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 55, 760–773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhang W., Zhou R. G., Gao Y. J., Zheng S. Z., Xu P., Zhang S. Q., Sun D. Y. (2009) Molecular and Genetic evidence for the key role of AtCaM3 in heat-shock signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 149, 1773–1784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sangwan V., Orvar B. L., Beyerly J., Hirt H., Dhindsa R. S. (2002) Opposite changes in membrane fluidity mimic cold and heat stress activation of distinct plant MAP kinase pathways. Plant J. 31, 629–638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Tang W. Q., Deng Z. P., Wang Z. Y. (2010) Protomics shed light on the brassinosteroid signaling mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 27–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tang W. Q. (2012) Quantitative analysis of plasma membrane proteome using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Methods Mol. Biol. 876, 67–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tang W. Q., Deng Z. P., Oses-Prieto J., Suzuki N., Zhu S. W., Zhang X., Burlingame A. L., Wang Z. Y. (2008) Proteomics studies of brassinosteroid signal transduction using prefractionation and two dimensional DIGE. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 728–738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Knight H., Trewavas A. J., Knight M. R. (1996) Cold calcium signaling in Arabidopsis involves two cellular pools and a change in calcium signature after acclimation. Plant Cell 8, 489–503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Clark G. B., Lee D., Dauwalder M., Roux S. J. (2005) Immunolocalization and histochemical evidence for the association of two different Arabidopsis annexins with secretion during early seedling growth and development. Planta 220, 621–631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Clark G. B., Morgan R. O., Fernandez M.-P., Roux S. J. (2012) Evolutionary adaptation of plant annexins has diversified their molecular structures, interactions, and functional roles. New Phytol. 196, 695–712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Clark G. B., Sessions A., Eastburn D. J., Roux S. J. (2001) Differential expression of members of the annexin multigene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 126, 1072–1084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Clark G. B., Lee D., Dauwalder M., Roux S. J. (2005) Immunolocalization and histochemical evidence for the association of two different Arabidopsis annexins with secretion during early seedling growth and development. Planta 220, 621–631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Laohavisit A., Richards S. L., Shabala L., Chen C., Colaco R. D. D. R., Swarbreck S. M., Shaw E., Dark A., Shabala S., Shang Z., Davies J. M. (2013) Salinity-induced calcium signaling and root adaptation in Arabidopsis require the calcium regulatory protein Annexin1. Plant Physiol. 163, 253–262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Richards S. L., Laohavisit A., Mortimer J. C., Shabala L., Swarbreck S. M., Shabala S., Davies J. M. (2014) Annexin 1 regulates the H2O2-induced calcium signature in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant J. 77, 136–145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Xu X. D., Hotta C. T., Dodd A. N., Love J., Sharrock R., Lee Y. W., Xie Q., Johnson C. H., Wevv A. A. (2007) Distinct light and clock modulation of cytosolic free Ca2+ oscillations and rhythmic CHLOROPHYLL A/B BINDING PROTEIN2 promoter activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 3474–3490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zheng S. Z., Liu Y. L., Li B., Shang Z. L., Zhou R. G., Sun D. Y. (2012) Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C9 is involved in the thermotolerance of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 69, 689–700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Laohavisit A., Davies J. M. (2011) Annexins. New Phytol. 189, 40–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Jami S. K., Clark G. B., Turlapati S. A., Handley C. A., Roux S. J., Kirti P. B. (2008) Ectopic expression of an annexin from Brassica juncea confers tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress treatments in transgenic tobacco. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 46, 1019–1030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Konopka-Postupolska D., Clark G., Goch G., Dębski J., Floras K., Cantero A., Fijolek B., Roux S., Hennig J. (2009) The role of annexin 1 in drought stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 150, 1394–1410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lee S., Lee E. J., Yang E. J., Lee J. E., Park A. R., Song W. H., Park O. K. (2004) Proteomic identification of annexins, calcium-dependent membrane binding proteins that mediate osmotic stress and abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16, 1378–1391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zhang Y., Xu L., Zhu X., Gong Y., Xiang F., Sun X., Liu L. (2013) Proteomic analysis of heat stress response in leaves of radish (Raphanus sativus l.). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 31, 195–203 [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chu P., Chen H., Zhou Y., Li Y., Ding Y., Jiang L., Tsang E. W. T., Wu K., Huang S. (2012) Proteomic and functional analyses of Nelumbo nucifera annexins involved in seed thermotolerance and germination vigor. Planta 235, 1271–1288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Clark G., Konopka-Postupolska D., Hennig J., Roux S. (2010) Is annexin 1 a multifunctional protein during stress responses? Plant Signal. Behav. 5, 303–307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Laohavisit A., Shang Z., Rubio L., Cuin T. A., Véry A. A., Wang A., Mortimer J. C., Macpherson N., Coxon K. M., Battey N. H. (2012) Arabidopsis annexin1 mediates the radical-activated plasma membrane Ca2+- and K+-permeable conductance in root cells. Plant Cell 24, 1522–1533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Konopka-Postupolska D., Clark G., Hofmann A. (2011) Structure, function, and membrane interactions of plant annexins: an update. Plant Sci. 181, 230–241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Swarbreck S. M., Colaco R., Davies J. M. (2013) Plant calcium-permeable channels. Plant Physiol. 163, 514–522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Davies J. M. (2014) Annexin-mediated calcium signaling in plants. Plants 3, 128–140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]