Skip to main content
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
editorial
. 2015 Mar 6;9:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00035

The effects of hearing loss on neural processing and plasticity

Arthur Wingfield 1,*, Jonathan E Peelle 2,*
PMCID: PMC4351590  PMID: 25798095

Hearing loss—ranging from mild to severe—afflicts large numbers of individuals of all ages. It is estimated that 40–50% of adults over the age of 65 years have some degree of significant hearing loss, with this figure rising to 83% of those over the age of 70 (Cruickshanks et al., 1998). This makes hearing loss the third most prevalent chronic medical condition among older adults after arthritis and hypertension (Lethbridge-Cejku et al., 2004). Recent years have seen increasing appreciation for the downstream consequences of reduced hearing acuity, even when perception itself has been successful. In the case of speech, these consequences include negative effects of perceptual effort on encoding what has been heard in memory (Rabbitt, 1991; Surprenant, 1999; Pichora-Fuller, 2003; McCoy et al., 2005; Cousins et al., 2014) and comprehension of sentences whose processing is resource-demanding because of complex syntax (Wingfield et al., 2006). Beyond these short-term effects, there also appear to be small but statistically significant correlations between hearing acuity and the appearance of all-cause dementia (Gates et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2011b) and performance on standardized cognitive tests in non-demented individuals (Lin et al., 2011a). Strikingly, the relationship between hearing acuity and cognitive ability holds even when adjusted for sex, age, education, diabetes, smoking history, and hypertension (Lin, 2011; Lin et al., 2011a; Humes et al., 2013a).

The effects of impaired hearing thus goes beyond difficulty in speech recognition. Speech comprehension in the face of mild-to-moderate hearing loss modifies patterns of neural activation in BOLD imaging, and analyses of structural MRI images have shown that poor hearing acuity is associated with reduced gray matter volume in auditory cortex (Peelle et al., 2011; Eckert et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2014). Findings such as these indicate a biological link between sensory stimulation and cortical integrity, consistent with animal models demonstrating neural reorganization when sensory input is disrupted. In humans, these effects on auditory cortex may have cascading influences throughout the hierarchical set of regions involved in speech processing (Davis and Johnsrude, 2003; Rauschecker and Scott, 2009; Peelle et al., 2010).

Understanding sensory-cognitive interactions represents an important research challenge, especially when changes in hearing acuity are compounded by declines in working memory resources and executive function that often occur in adult aging. One must also note claims of an increase in hearing loss among young adults (Shargorodsky et al., 2010), many of whom remain unaware of their hearing loss and the consequences of perceptual effort on cognitive performance (Widen et al., 2009; Le Prell et al., 2011). At the level of remediation, surgically placed cochlear implants have seen increasing use, to include use with older adults, when hearing acuity has declined to a point where standard hearing aids no longer yield significant benefit (Dillon et al., 2013). This emerging technology will call increasingly on the translational potential of basic research in auditory physiology currently active in human and animal studies.

This research topic presents a collection of original articles that explore the cognitive and neural consequences of hearing loss, including basic processes carried out in the auditory periphery, computations in subcortical nuclei and primary auditory cortex, and higher-level processes such as those involved in human speech perception. Together, these articles form a compelling body of work demonstrating numerous ways in which brain structure, neural function, and behavior are impacted by hearing loss.

We begin with seven review and theory articles. Rönnberg and coauthors offer a timely update of the Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model in which they stress the importance of working memory for online spoken language processing, especially under poor listening conditions (Rönnberg et al., 2013). Heald and Nusbaum (2014) continue this theme, arguing that even early-stage speech recognition is an attentionally-guided active process and not as automatic as some have suggested. Review articles by Guediche et al. (2014) and by Keating and King (2013) stress the flexibility in the perceptual system that allows for adaptation to auditory perturbations. Eggermont (2013) and by Butler and Lomber (2013) focus primarily on animal models to explore effects of experience on auditory processing, while Bharadwaj et al. (2014) review human and animals studies demonstrating that precision in temporal coding may be poor even when hearing thresholds are normal. Taken together, these papers emphasize the view that auditory detection thresholds give only a limited picture of auditory and auditory-cortical processing.

Additional evidence bearing on plasticity and development appears in six research articles using animal models. Gay et al. (2014) and Kang et al. (2014) explore mechanisms underlying interactions between early conductive hearing loss and effects on detection tasks in adulthood, while Kamal et al. (2013) focus on impact and reversibility of noise exposure effects in auditory cortex. Huetz et al. (2014) examine functional modification to cortical cells in response to moderate hearing loss. Henry et al. (2014) report effects of noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss on complex temporal coding, and Kral et al. (2013) examine the implications of hemisphere asymmetries in cortical adaptation to unilateral hearing loss in development.

Studies in human listeners reveal many of the same aspects of plasticity in the perceptual system as seen in animal models. Avivi-Reich et al. (2014) illustrate the dynamic interaction between bottom-up input and top-down cognitive factors when older adults are challenged by listening to a target speaker in a background of multiple speakers and when listening in a second language. Mishra et al. (2013) continue this theme with an emphasis on the role of selective attention when listening to speech in noise. Humes et al. (2013b) examine individual difference factors that influence successful speech comprehension beyond peripheral hearing acuity. The value of in-depth studies of a single individual is illustrated by Firszt et al. (2013) who report neural and performance changes in an adult patient following successful surgery for a congenital unilateral hearing loss. Anderson et al. (2013) offer additional evidence bearing on plasticity in the sensory-cognitive system in a study of compensatory training through directed attention in hearing impaired older adults. McGettigan et al. (2014) address learning-related changes in speech recognition using noise-vocoded speech to simulate the acoustic input available from a cochlear implant. Finally, Ihlefeld et al. (2014) focus their research article on factors relating to cochlear implant recipients' decrements in the use of interaural time differences for localizing sound sources in space.

Considerable advances have been made using a number of human brain imaging techniques, as illustrated by a final eight articles in this collection that have examined effects of hearing loss using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to assess white matter integrity (Rachakonda et al., 2014), functional MRI to reveal patterns of neural reorganization and compensatory cognitive control with hearing loss and aging (Erb and Obleser, 2013; Husain et al., 2014), patterns of neural responses using electroencephalograph (EEG) recordings from scalp electrodes (Becker et al., 2013; Campbell and Sharma, 2013; Catz and Noreña, 2013; Tremblay et al., 2014) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to examine contributory effects of reduced inhibitory control in older adults with hearing impairment (Alain, 2014).

Together, these collected articles reflect a valuable sample of current approaches to our understanding of the effects of hearing loss on neural and perceptual processing. A theme that emerges from both the human and animal studies in this collection is that of an adaptive plasticity in the sensory, perceptual and cognitive systems that regulates performance in the face of often seriously degraded input. Challenges for future research include better understanding the link between neural consequences of hearing loss and other modifications of acoustic input (Van Engen and Peelle, 2014) and a more direct linking of hearing ability, brain structure, neural function, and behavior.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The preparation of this manuscript was aided by NIH grants R01AG019714 and R01AG03890 from the National Institute on Aging and The Dana Foundation.

References

  1. Alain C. (2014). Effects of age-related hearing loss and background noise on neuromagnetic activity from auditory cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:8. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson S., White-Schwoch T., Choi H. J., Kraus N. (2013). Training changes processing of speech cues in older adults with hearing loss. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:97. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avivi-Reich M., Daneman M., Schneider B. A. (2014). How age and linguistic competence alter the interplay of perceptual and cognitive factors when listening to conversations in a noisy environment. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:21. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker R., Pefkou M., Michel C. M., Hervais-Adelman A. G. (2013). Left temporal alpha-band activity reflects single word intelligibility. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:121. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bharadwaj H. M., Verhulst S., Shaheen L., Liberman M. C., Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2014). Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:26. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler B. E., Lomber S. G. (2013). Functional and structural changes throughout the auditory system following congenital and early-onset deafness: implications for hearing restoration. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:92. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell J., Sharma A. (2013). Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:71. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Catz N., Noreña A. (2013). Enhanced representation of spectral contrasts in the primary auditory cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:21. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cousins K. A. Q., Dar H., Wingfield A., Miller P. (2014). Acoustic masking disrupts time-dependent mechanisms of memory encoding in word-list recall. Mem. Cogn. 42, 622–638. 10.3758/s13421-013-0377-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cruickshanks K. J., Wiley T. L., Tweed T. S., Klein B. E., Klein R., Mares-Perlman J. A., et al. (1998). Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 148, 879–886. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis M. H., Johnsrude I. S. (2003). Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 23, 3423–3431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dillon M. T., Buss E., Adunka M. C., King E. R., Pillsbury H. C., Adunka O. F., et al. (2013). Long-term speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 139, 279–283. 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eckert M. A., Cute S. L., Vaden K. I., Jr., Kuchinsky S. E., Dubno J. R. (2012). Auditory cortex signs of age-related hearing loss. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 13, 703–713. 10.1007/s10162-012-0332-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eggermont J. J. (2013). On the similarities and differences of non-traumatic sound exposure during the critical period and in adulthood. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:12. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Erb J., Obleser J. (2013). Upregulation of cognitive control networks in older adults' speech comprehension. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:116. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Firszt J. B., Reeder R. M., Holden T. A., Burton H., Chole R. A. (2013). Changes in auditory perceptions and cortex resulting from hearing recovery after extended congenital unilateral hearing loss. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:108. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gates G. A., Anderson M. L., McCurry S. M., Feeney M. P., Larson E. B. (2011). Central auditory dysfunction as a harbinger of Alzheimer dementia. Arch. Orolaryngol. 137, 390–395. 10.1001/archoto.2011.28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gay J. D., Voytenko S. V., Galazyuk A. V., Rosen M. J. (2014). Developmental hearing loss impairs signal detection in noise: putative central mechanisms. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:162. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guediche S., Blumstein S., Fiez J. A., Holt L. L. (2014). Speech perception under adverse conditions: insights from behavioral, computational and neuroscience research. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:126. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heald S., Nusbaum H. C. (2014). Speech perception as an active cognitive process. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:35. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Henry K. S., Kale S., Heinz M. G. (2014). Noise-induced hearing loss increases the temporal precision of complex envelope coding by auditory-nerve fibers. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:20. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huetz C., Guedin M., Edeline J.-M. (2014). Neural correlates of moderate hearing loss: time course of response changes in the primary auditory cortex of awake guinea-pigs. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:65. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Humes L. E., Busey T. A., Craig J., Kewley-Port D. (2013a). Are age-related changes in cognitive function driven by age-related changes in sensory processing? Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 75, 508–524. 10.3758/s13414-012-0406-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Humes L. E., Kidd G. R., Lentz J. J. (2013b). Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:55. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Husain F. T., Carpenter-Thompson J. R., Schmidt S. A. (2014). The effect of mild-to-moderate hearing loss on auditory and emotion processing networks. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:10. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ihlefeld A., Kan A., Litovsky R. Y. (2014). Across-frequency combination of interaural time difference in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:22. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kamal B. S., Holman C., de Villers-Sidani E. (2013). Shaping the aging brain: role of auditory input patterns in the emergence of auditory cortical impairments. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:52. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kang R., Sarro E., Sanes D. (2014). Auditory training during development mitigates a hearing loss-induced perceptual deficit. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:49. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Keating P., King A. J. (2013). Developmental plasticity of spatial hearing following asymmetric hearing loss: context-dependent cue integration and its clinical implications. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:123. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kral A., Heid S., Hubka P., Tillein J. (2013). Unilateral hearing during development: hemispheric specificity in plastic reorganizations. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:93. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Le Prell C. G., Hensley B. N., Campbell K. C. M., Hall J. W., Guire K. (2011). Evidence of hearing loss in a ‘normally-hearing’ college-student population. Int. J. Audiol. 50, S21–S31. 10.3109/14992027.2010.540722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lethbridge-Cejku M., Schiller J. S., Bernadel L. (2004). Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health inverview survey, 2002. Vital Health Stat. 10, 1–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin F. R. (2011). Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United States. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 66A, 1131–1136. 10.1093/gerona/glr115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lin F. R., Ferrucci L., An Y., Goh J. O., Doshi J., Metter E. J., et al. (2014). Association of hearing impairment with brain volume changes in older adults. Neuroimage 90, 84–92. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lin F. R., Ferrucci L., Metter E. J., An Y., Zonderman A. B., Resnick S. M. (2011a). Hearing loss and cognition in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Neuropsychology 25, 763–770. 10.1037/a0024238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lin F. R., Metter J., O'Brien R. J., Resnick S. M., Zonderman A. B., Ferrucci L. (2011b). Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch. Neurol. 68, 214–220. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McCoy S. L., Tun P. A., Cox L. C., Colangelo M., Stewart R., Wingfield A. (2005). Hearing loss and perceptual effort: downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 22–33. 10.1080/02724980443000151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McGettigan C., Rosen S., Scott S. K. (2014). Lexico-semantic and acoustic-phonetic processes in the perception of noise-vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implantation. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:18. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mishra S., Lunner T., Stenfelt S., Rönnberg J., Rudner M. (2013). Seeing the talker's face supports executive processing of speech in steady state noise. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:96. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Peelle J. E., Johnsrude I. S., Davis M. H. (2010). Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4:51. 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Peelle J. E., Troiani V., Grossman M., Wingfield A. (2011). Hearing loss in older adults affects neural systems supporting speech comprehension. J. Neurosci. 31, 12638–12643. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2559-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pichora-Fuller M. K. (2003). Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int. J. Audiol. 42, 2S26–2S32. 10.3109/14992020309074641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rabbitt P. M. A. (1991). Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. Acta Otolaryngolica Suppl. 476, 167–176. discussion: 176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rachakonda T., Shimony J. S., Coalson R. S., Lieu J. E. C. (2014). Diffusion tensor imaging in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:87. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rauschecker J. P., Scott S. K. (2009). Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 718–724. 10.1038/nn.2331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rönnberg J., Lunner T., Zekveld A., Sörqvist P., Danielsson H., Lyxell B., et al. (2013). The ease of language understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:31. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shargorodsky J., Curhan S. G., Curhan G. C., Eavey R. (2010). Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 304, 772–778. 10.1001/jama.2010.1124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Surprenant A. M. (1999). The effect of noise on memory for spoken syllables. Int. J. Psychol. 34, 328–333 10.1080/002075999399648 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tremblay K., Ross B., Inoue K., McClannahan K., Collet G. (2014). Is the auditory evoked P2 response a biomarker of learning? Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:28. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Engen K. J., Peelle J. E. (2014). Listening effort and accented speech. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:577. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Widen S. E., Holmes A. E., Johnson T., Bohlin M., Erlandsson S. I. (2009). Hearing, use of hearing protection, and attitudes towards noise among young American adults. Int. J. Audiol. 48, 537–545. 10.1080/14992020902894541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wingfield A., McCoy S. L., Peelle J. E., Tun P. A., Cox C. (2006). Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 17, 487–497. 10.3766/jaaa.17.7.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES