Skip to main content
Advances in Nutrition logoLink to Advances in Nutrition
. 2015 Mar 5;6(2):206–213. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007450

Microbial Degradation of Whole-Grain Complex Carbohydrates and Impact on Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Health1,2,3,4

Knud Erik Bach Knudsen 1,*
PMCID: PMC4352179  PMID: 25770259

Abstract

Whole-grain cereals have a complex dietary fiber (DF) composition consisting of oligosaccharides (mostly fructans), resistant starch, and nonstarch polysaccharides (NSPs); the most important are arabinoxylans, mixed-linkage β(1,3; 1,4)-d-glucan (β-glucan), and cellulose and the noncarbohydrate polyphenolic ether lignin. The highest concentration of NSPs and lignin is found in the outer cell layers of the grain, and refined flour will consequently be depleted of a large proportion of insoluble DF components. The flow and composition of carbohydrates to the large intestine are directly related to the intake of DF. The type and composition of cereal DF can consequently be used to modulate the microbial composition and activity as well as the production and molar ratios of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Arabinoxylans and β-glucan in whole-grain cereals and cereal ingredients have been shown to augment SCFA production, with the strongest relative effect on butyrate. When arabinoxylans were provided as a concentrate, the effect was only on total SCFA production. Increased SCFA production in the large intestine was shown by the concentration in the portal vein, whereas the impact on the concentration in peripheral blood was less because the majority of propionate and butyrate is cleared in the liver. Active microbial fermentation with increased SCFA production reduced the exposure of potentially toxic compounds to the epithelium, potentially stimulating anorectic hormones and acting as signaling molecules between the gut and the peripheral tissues. The latter can have implications for insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis.

Keywords: whole-grain cereals, complex carbohydrates, short-chain fatty acids, butyrate

Introduction

Several epidemiologic studies have indicated that the consumption of whole-grain cereals is protective against several chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and some forms of cancer (14). Whole-grain cereals are a rich source of dietary fiber (DF)5 and bioactive compounds. The DF components, however, are unevenly distributed in the grain; the outer tissues (pericarp/testa, aleurone) contain the highest concentrations of DF (3, 5), and depleting the flour of the outer tissues may eliminate ∼58% of DF, in particular its insoluble components (3).

DFs are the fraction of carbohydrates and lignin that are not degraded by endogenous enzymes in the small intestine (6). Although some degradation occurs in the small intestine, the major portion passes to the large intestine, where it is fermented by the colonic microbiota (7). Fermentation of DF carbohydrates leads to the production of SCFAs, mainly acetate, propionate, and butyrate; gases (hydrogen and methane); and other metabolites (8). The ratio of SCFA production and absorption is dependent on fermentation substrate, the microbial composition, and colonic transit time (9). The substrate dependency has been used as a subject to manipulate the SCFA composition (10, 11). Most SCFAs are absorbed by the colonic epithelium or metabolized by other colonic bacteria, resulting in only 5–10% of SCFAs being excreted in feces (8). SCFAs play an important role in gut and potentially metabolic health (9, 12). The main purpose of the present review is to discuss current knowledge concerning the microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates from cereals and influence on SCFA production and impact on health.

Complex Carbohydrates in Whole-Grain Cereals and Refined Products

The DF fraction of cereals consists of nonstarch polysaccharides (NSPs), resistant starch (RS), oligosaccharides (mostly fructans), and the noncarbohydrate polyphenolic ether lignin. The main NSPs in cereals are arabinoxylans, mixed-linkage β(1,3; 1,4)-d-glucan (β-glucan), and cellulose. These polymers are present in the cell walls along with lignin, lignans, phenolic acids, and minor amounts of protein. The cell walls of the different tissues have a complex structure with variable properties and composition (13). The cell walls from the outer part of the kernel primarily play a role in protection, and the cell walls in these tissues are consequently thick, hydrophobic, and consist of cellulose, xylans, and significant amounts of lignin. In endosperm tissues that include the aleurone layer, the cell walls are thin and hydrophilic and are primarily made up of 2 polymers: arabinoxylans and β-glucan. The cell wall polysaccharides of the aleurone, although part of the endosperm, are largely insoluble, in contrast to the cell wall polysaccharides of the remaining endosperm (14, 15). The compositions as well as the fine structure of cell walls of similar types of tissue differ: wheat and rye are more similar than are oats, barley, and corn (1315). The cereal type and relative proportion of tissues in the flour fraction therefore have a great impact on NSPs and lignin concentrations as shown in Table 1. Dry milling is a convenient way to concentrate tissues with specific functional properties: for example, oat bran has a high content of β-glucan and aleurone from wheat has a high content of arabinoxylans (5, 16).

TABLE 1.

Starch and NSP content of whole grain, refined flour, and bran from wheat, rye, and oats1

Wheat
Rye
Oats
Flour Bran Flour Bran Flour Bran
Extraction rate, % 100 ∼60 100 ∼60 100 ∼60
Starch, g/kg DM 696 832 55 658 767 275 612 710 424
NSPs, g/kg DM
 Fructans 9 6 17 31 23 40 1 1 2
 Cellulose 19 2 114 13 5 23 6 4 8
 β-Glucan 6 2 24 20 8 45 38 22 98
 Arabinoxylans 71 21 337 96 43 216 21 14 36
 Others2 19 9 58 25 17 37 10 8 13
Total NSPs, g/kg DM 124 40 550 185 96 361 76 49 157
Lignin, g/kg DM 15 0 72 17 2 51 20 7 30
Dietary fiber, g/kg DM 139 40 622 202 98 412 96 56 187
1

DM, dry matter; NSP, nonstarch polysaccharide.

2

The sum of noncellulosic residues galactose, mannose, uronic acids, and glucose not accounted for as β-glucan or cellulose.

RS is the fraction of starch that is not digested in the small intestine. Starch may be nondigestible because it is trapped within whole plant cell matrices (RS1), the starch granules are resistant (RS2), the starch is retrograded (RS3), or if it is chemically modified (RS4) (17). The amounts of RS are usually low in common cereal starches, with an amylose content of 20–30%, whereas high-amylose starch types may contain higher amounts (18). RS can also be formed in connection with the cooling process of a starch gel after heating (18).

Fructans consist of 1 glucose unit linked to a varying number of fructose units (320) present predominantly in the endosperm and germ tissues (19). Both branched and unbranched chains occur.

Regulation of the Flow of Substrate for Fermentation in the Large Intestine

Individuals who have undergone an ileostomy have been used as a model to study and quantify the amount of nutrients that pass from the small to the large intestine and thereby potentially can be available for fermentation (Figure 1). In studies with cereal products (soft and crisp breads and breakfast cereals), there is a strong relation between the intake of DF (NSPs + RS) and the flow of dry solids and carbohydrates to the large intestine (2024). Carbohydrates account for 30–43% of the dry solids.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Influence of the intake of NSPs and RS on the ileal flow of dry solids and carbohydrates in subjects who underwent ileostomy. Values are means. CHO, carbohydrates; NSP, nonstarch polysaccharides; RS, resistant starch. Data from references 2024.

The structure of the starch granule in cereals (20–30% amylose content) makes starch relatively easily accessible for amylolysis in the small intestine when provided as breads or breakfast cereals. The luminal viscosity created by the soluble β-glucan and arabinoxylans may delay the digestion and absorption processes and thereby impede starch hydrolysis (25, 26). However, most studies showed that, quantitatively, starch digestion was only marginally affected, by 1.3% and 1.9%, after consumption of low- and high-DF diets, respectively (21, 23). This is consistent with studies in ileal-cannulated pigs fed wheat or rye breads (27, 28); although intact kernels may reduce the digestibility of starch, the reduction was <1% (29).

No endogenous carbohydrases capable of cleaving the NSP bonds are secreted to the small intestine in humans. Nevertheless, degradation of NSPs occurs during passage in the small intestine because of microbial carbohydrases. The molecular weight reduction in linear β-glucans is substantial in humans and pigs in contrast to the negligible degradation of the more structurally complex arabinoxylans from wheat, rye, and oats when provided as bread or breakfast cereals (20, 21, 23, 24). RS present as RS2 or RS3 is also more or less quantitatively recovered in ileal effluent (2024). Currently, it is not known to what extent cereal fructans are degraded in the small intestine of humans, but animal studies (19) and studies with inulin from Jerusalem artichokes suggest that fructans that survive the baking process will be recovered in the ileal effluent (30).

Microflora of the Large Intestine

The environment in the large intestine has all of the conditions for prolific bacterial growth: it is warm, moist, anaerobic, and filled with feed residues that flow at a relatively low speed. The numbers of bacterial cells can reach 1011–1012/g, 10-fold greater than the number of cells in the human body (7, 31, 32). Colonic bacteria have a far larger repertoire of degrading enzymes and metabolic capabilities than their host, and dietary changes may affect or interact with the microbial community and the metabolic outcome through several interrelated mechanisms. First, the metabolism is regulated within each individual species of gut bacterium where alternative substrates can give rise to different products as a result of fermentation via different metabolic routes; second, the same substrate can be processed via different routes depending on the rate of supply or the physiology and environment of the bacterial cell (31, 32).

Firmicutes, Bacteriodetes, and Actinobacteria are the dominant bacterial phyla in healthy humans, with Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia present in lower numbers (33, 34). Some of the species are commonly detected in high numbers in most adult fecal samples. Tap et al. (35) reported 66 particularly abundant phylotypes among 17 healthy individuals, and Walker et al. (36) found 50 dominant phylotypes, which each represented > 0.5% of total 16S ribosomal RNA sequenced across 6 obese male individuals. Five of the top 10 species (Bacteroides vulgatus, Eubacterium rectale, Faecalibacterium pausnitzii, Colinsella aerofaciens, and Ruminococcus bromii) corresponded to the top 5 most abundant bacteria detected in an entirely culture-dependent study.

Impact of Carbohydrates on Microbial Composition in the Large Intestine

The degradation by the microbial community of carbohydrates in the large intestine occurs in a hierarchic fashion: sugar residues = oligosaccharides > starch residues > soluble NSPs > insoluble NSPs. In pigs, almost all sugars, fructans, residual starch, and the soluble DF components (β-glucan and soluble arabinoxylans) are degraded in the cecum and proximal colon where the microbial activity is high (28, 37, 38), whereas insoluble arabinoxylans and cellulose are degraded at more distal locations (28, 37). By linkage composition analyses (39), it was also shown that the aleurone arabinoxylans resemble those of the ileal sample more than the fecal sample, whereas endosperm arabinoxylans had the fecal xylose substitution pattern already in the proximal colon. For pericarp/testa arabinoxylans, the substitution pattern was similar in the ileum, proximal colon, and feces (39).

The fecal microbiota profile in healthy adults is generally quite stable over time, but the consumption of selected prebiotics (i.e., nondigestible oligosaccharides and RS) were shown to change the microbial community (40, 41). The fecal microbiota profiles of obese male subjects given diets differing in type and content of DF (RS3, NSPs from wheat bran, and a weight-loss diet) for 3-wk periods tended to group by individuals more than by diets (36). However, marked changes were found in the relative abundance of several dominant phylotypes in response to intake of RS, whereas there was no effect of NSPs from wheat bran (36). The changes occurred within a few days, and they were reversed equally quickly by a subsequent dietary shift. The lack of effect of the NSPs from wheat bran is presumably a consequence of the diverse NSP composition of wheat bran, with no single NSP being dominant (Table 1). Similar results were found by Costabile et al. (42). Feeding whole-grain wheat, however, increased Bifidobacterium spp. and resulted in a higher lactobacilli:enterococci ratio. Another intervention study with whole grain vs. refined wheat documented significantly higher (P = 0.04) numbers of Bifidobacterium spp. (43). Thus, whole grains have a potential to influence microbial composition, although the effect is less pronounced than when using prebiotics with a dominating polysaccharide (RS, inulin) or oligosaccharide (41, 44).

SCFA Production and Absorption

SCFAs are present at concentrations of ∼100 mmol/kg colonic material but with a decreasing concentration from the cecum/proximal colon to the distal colon in humans (45) and animals (38). Cecum and proximal colon are the most active site for fermentation and with the lowest pH (5.4–6.4) depending on the rate of fermentation. Acetate accounts for approximately two-thirds of the produced SCFAs and is formed by many of the bacteria groups that inhabit the colon (32) (Figure 2), whereas the number of bacteria groups that form propionate and butyrate is more restricted (32). There is also a substantial utilization of acetate during butyrate formation (46). As discussed in the previous section, the potential for changing the microbial composition by whole-grain cereals and cereal fractions is lower than by prebiotics with dominating oligo- or polysaccharides. However, several studies showed that β-glucan and arabinoxylans, when present in the whole-grain matrix, can be regulatory factors for SCFA production and profile in the large intestine. An arabinoxylan-rich cereal-based diet was found to stimulate the proliferation of butyrate-producing microorganisms (i.e., F. pausnitzii, Roseburia intestinalis) (46), butyrate production in the large intestine (47), and the net portal absorption of butyrate (48) to a larger extent than a diet with equal amounts of DF in the form of RS (Table 2). A Western-style diet high in refined carbohydrates from sugar and refined wheat flour was used as a reference diet (47, 48). In contrast to these findings, studies in rats and pigs fed an arabinoxylan-rich fraction from wheat did not specifically show enhanced butyrate but only total SCFA production (49, 50). The reasons for this difference in butyrate response between these 2 sets of experiments cannot be determined by any certainty but may be related to the way the arabinoxylans was provided, as a concentrate from wheat (49, 50) or as part of a whole-grain matrix (27, 47, 48). The fermentation of the arabinoxylan concentrate can be expected to be rapid, as indicated by the results in references 49 and 50, and with a decrease in pH mainly in the cecum (48), whereas the fermentation of arabinoxylans from a whole-grain matrix will be slower, with a decrease in pH not only in the cecum but also in the proximal colon (28). pH has been found to play a crucial role for the balance between acetate and butyrate production in the gut (51), and it cannot be excluded that this is a key factor why arabinoxylans fermentation under some conditions leads to enhanced butyrate production. In support of an impact of the whole-grain matrix on butyrate production is a human study in which the subjects consumed wheat and rye breads (WR) that were prepared without (WR) and with (WR+) xylanases and compared with refined wheat (Table 3) (52). It was found that the concentration of total SCFAs and butyrate in feces was increased after the intervention with the WR diet, but it was only for the WR+ treatment that the effect was significant. Likewise, the concentrations of acetate, propionate, and butyrate in feces all increased when human subjects consumed either wheat arabinoxylan- or inulin-enriched bread, but only the butyrate concentration changed significantly with wheat arabinoxylans (53). A range of other in vivo studies (27, 37, 5458) also pointed toward arabinoxylans as a fermentative substrate that stimulates butyrate formation, whereas the outcome of in vitro fermentation studies is more variable, with some finding stimulating effects (59, 60) but others not (61).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

A schematic of the gut microbiota involved in the metabolism of SCFAs. Acetate and lactate are shown as intermediates. Representative species and phyla are indicated based on information from cultured microorganisms. CoA, coenzyme A. Reproduced from reference 32 with permission.

TABLE 2.

Net portal absorption of total SCFAs and butyrate and butyrate concentrations in the portal vein and mesenteric artery as estimated in conscious catheterized pigs in vivo fed cereal-based diets varying in dietary fiber content and composition1

Content, g/kg DM
Absorption, mmol/d
Butyrate, μmol/ L
Diet NDO RS Cellulose β-glucan AX NSP DF T-SCFAs Butyrate Butyrate, % PV MA Ref
LF wheat nm nm 19 3 33 59 64 720 46 6.3 29 6 (65)
HF wheat bran nm nm 28 5 68 108 122 738 77 10.4 51 7 (65)
HF oat bran nm nm 22 40 44 113 121 891 101 11.3 62 8 (65)
WSD 2 6 29 1 18 58 70 888c 67a 7.5b 34b 3c (48)
RSD 5 113 34 1 15 55 192 1584b 136a 8.6b 75b 6b (48)
AXD 29 8 37 16 72 144 189 2448a 245b 10.0a 133a 8a (48)
WFRF 4 nm 131 12 53 220 234 1595 91b 5.7b 52b 10b (27)
WGRRB 18 nm 20 19 127 203 253 1845 242a 13.1a 141a 25a (27)
1

Values are means. Means without a common letter in the same column within each experiment differ, P < 0.05. AX, arabinoxylan; AXD, arabinoxylan-rich diet; DF, dietary fiber; DM, dry matter; HF, high-fiber; LF, low-fiber; MA, mesenteric artery; NDO, nondigestible oligosaccharide; nm, not measured; NSP, nonstarch polysaccharide; PV, portal vein; Ref, reference; RS, resistant starch; RSD, resistant starch diet; T-SCFA, total short-chain fatty acid; WFRF, wheat flour plus refined fiber; WGRRB, whole-grain rye plus rye bran; WSD, Western-style diet.

TABLE 3.

Fecal SCFA excretions after 3-wk consumption of wheat and rye breads that were prepared without and with xylanases1

Treatment period, μmol/g wet feces
Metabolite Pre-WR+ (WR treatment) WR+ (WR+ treatment) Pre-WR (WR treatment) WR (WR treatment)
Acetic acid 26.4 (19.5–39.5) 36.6 (24.0–46.7) 29.0 (18.0–38.4) 33.8 (26.6–40.3)
Propionic acid 7.9 (6.1–10.7) 11.1 (7.4–14.2) 8.5 (5.7–11.0) 9.8 (7.8–11.2)
Butyric acid 10.7 (6.0–19.8) 18.3 (12.4–28.0)* 11.4 (5.5–18.6) 13.7 (9.4–21.7)
Total SCFAs 45.5 (32.3–70.0) 70.8 (46.8–84.0)* 48.9 (32.0–67.0) 58.5 (40.3–75.1)
1

Values are medians (IQRs), n = 27. *Different from pre-WR+ period, P < 0.05. Adapted from reference 51 with permission. W, wheat flour bread without in situ–produced arabinoxylan oligosaccharides; WR, wheat/rye bread without in situ–produced arabinoxylan oligosaccharides; WR+, wheat/rye bread with in situ–produced arabinoxylan oligosaccharides.

β-Glucan also seems to have the potential to influence SCFA production. In patients with ulcerative colitis who daily consumed 60 g oat bran rich in β-glucan, it was found that the fecal butyrate concentration increased significantly, whereas the remaining fecal SCFA concentrations were unchanged (62). The data from the ulcerative colitis study corroborated studies in rats fed barley β-glucan (63, 64), pigs fed oat bran (37, 55), and portal vein–catheterized pigs fed an oat bran and an oat β-glucan–rich concentrate (65, 66).

SCFA Metabolism

DF amount and composition had a profound influence on the net portal absorption of SCFAs, including butyrate (27, 48, 65, 67) (Table 2). Within each experiment, butyrate absorption varied by 2 to 3.6 times between the lowest and highest concentrations due to differences in DF content (48, 65) and composition (27, 67). However, not only did DF content and composition influence total SCFA and butyrate absorption, but there was also a strong relation between net butyrate absorption and the butyrate concentration in the portal vein; for the data presented in Table 2, the correlation was 0.962. This is supported by pig studies in which pigs were deprived of feed for 24 h and then fed a pulse dose of either a barley-based diet rich in β-glucan (68) or a rye-based diet rich in arabinoxylans (27). In these studies, the concentration of butyrate in the portal vein started to increase 4 h postdosing (i.e., the time when the bulk of digesta reaches the large intestine) (27, 68). These data therefore seriously questioned the general view that butyrate is mainly consumed by the colonic epithelium (6971). Rather, the liver is the main site for the clearance, with clearance rates of propionate and butyrate of ∼94% and ∼82%, respectively, and a clearance rate of ∼41% for acetate (48). Augmenting DF intake therefore not only increased peripheral acetate but also propionate and butyrate, as shown in studies in pigs (Table 2) and humans (7275).

Physiologic and Health Effects of SCFAs

An unhealthy dietary pattern (i.e., consumption of diets high in fat and refined carbohydrates and low in DF) is regarded to be a significant health risk factor, limiting the production of SCFAs and giving rise to high luminal concentrations of putative risk factors (secondary bile acids, protein degradation products) (28, 49, 76). Diets with a higher DF content stimulate SCFA production and reduce the exposure of colonic epithelium to potentially toxic compounds (28, 49), which have been shown to oppose the induction of DNA stand breaks due to high protein concentrations. Although the study by Belobrajdic et al. (49) did not result in a highest relative proportion of SCFAs, the higher pool size indicates an enhanced total butyrate production, which is of interest because butyrate is believed to play an important role in maintaining colonic health and function. In addition to being an energy source for colonic epithelial cells (70, 71), butyrate can induce changes in gene expression influencing the colonic function, mainly by inhibiting the histone deacetylase (76). In vitro, butyrate was shown to reduce inflammation by inhibition of NF-κB activation and to upregulate PPARγ expression (77). Oxidative stress is involved in both inflammation and the initiation and progression of carcinogenesis. During oxidative stress, there is an imbalance between the generation of reactive oxygen species and the antioxidant defense mechanisms, leading to a cascade of reactions in which lipids, proteins, and/or DNA may be damaged (78). Furthermore, butyrate was shown to have a potent effect on the expression of genes involved in regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and metastasis in a human colonic epithelial cell line (79).

It has also been recognized that the binding of SCFAs to free fatty acid receptor (FFAR) 2 and FFAR3 located on colonic L-cells may be involved in controlling anorectic hormones including peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) (80). Oat β-glucan increased net SCFA absorption in portal vein–catheterized pigs, leading to a decreased apparent insulin production, which was associated with GLP-1 mediation (66); and supplementing a diet with 10% β-glucan increased total SCFA content in the cecum, suppressed central neuronal activity in the hypothalamic appetite centers, and decreased food intake (64). A recent study by Ingerslev et al. (48) in catheterized pigs, however, did not confirm a link between net portal SCFA absorption and the net portal GLP-1 flux but identified a lower insulin flux at higher net portal SCFA absorption.

SCFAs are also considered to be signaling molecules between the gut and the peripheral tissues, with implications for insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis (12, 74). The mechanisms appear to involve adipocyte cell differentiation, regulation, and metabolism (12, 75). In response to an increased DF intake, there is an increased absorption of SCFAs; and although the major part of propionate and butyrate is cleared in the liver, micromolar concentrations of all 3 SCFAs will reach the peripheral tissues (10) (Table 2). Here, the SCFAs can act as ligands on adipocytes (12, 81) and thereby influence the balance of adipokines released and, in turn, increase adipogenesis and differentiation of fat cells and thus reduce their average size. SCFAs further inhibit lipolysis within adipose tissue as indicated by the reduced plasma concentrations of nonesterified FAs after the intake of fermentable carbohydrates (8284) and the lower fasting concentrations of nonesterified FAs with higher SCFA production (48). The consequence is reduced availability of FAs for uptake into ectopic fat depots (e.g., liver and pancreas) (12). Overall, the above-mentioned conditions have been linked to improved insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis (12, 74, 75, 85, 86).

Conclusions

Whole-grain cereals have a diverse DF composition that can be used to produce diets with the potential to influence microbial composition, the production and molar proportions of SCFAs, and gut and metabolic health.

Acknowledgments

The sole author had responsibility for all parts of the manuscript.

Footnotes

5

Abbreviations used: DF, dietary fiber; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; NSP, nonstarch polysaccharide; RS, resistant starch; WR, wheat and rye breads.

References

  • 1.Aune D, Chan DS, Lau R, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Kampman E, Norat T. Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ 2011;343:d6617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Munter JS, Hu FB, Spiegelman D, Franz M, van Dam RM. Whole grain, bran, and germ intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and systematic review. PLoS Med 2007;4:e261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fardet A. New hypotheses for the health-protective mechanisms of whole-grain cereals: what is beyond fibre? Nutr Res Rev 2010;23:65–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Slavin J. Whole grains and human health. Nutr Res Rev 2004;17:99–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hemery Y, Rouau X, Lullien-Pellerin V, Barron C, Abecassis J. Dry processes to develop wheat fractions and products with enhanced nutritional quality. J Cereal Sci 2007;46:327–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCleary BV, DeVries JW, Rader JI, Cohen G, Prosky L, Mugford DC, Okuma K. Determination of insoluble, soluble, and total dietary fiber (CODEX definition) by enzymatic-gravimetric method and liquid chromatography: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2012;95:824–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes 2012;3:289–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Topping DL, Clifton PM. Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: Roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol Rev 2001;81:1031–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wong JM, de Souza R, Kendall CW, Emam A, Jenkins DJ. Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:235–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bach Knudsen KE. Effect of dietary non-digestible carbohydrates on the rate of SCFA delivery to peripheral tissues. Foods Food Ingred J Japan 2005;211:1008–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van Munster IP, Tangerman A, Nagengast FM. Effect of resistant starch on colonic fermentation, bile acid metabolism, and mucosal proliferation. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:834–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Robertson DM. Metabolic cross talk between the colon and the periphery: implications for insulin sensitivity. Proc Nutr Soc 2007;66:351–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saulnier L, Sado P-E, Branlard G, Charmet G, Guillon F. Wheat arabinoxylans: exploiting variation in amount and composition to develop enhanced varieties. J Cereal Sci 2007;46:261–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Izydorczyk MS, Dexter JE. Barley β-glucans and arabinoxylans: molecular structure, physicochemical properties, and uses in food products—a review. Food Res Int 2008;41:850–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saulnier L, Guillon F, Sado P-E, Rouau X. Plant cell wall polysaccharides in storage organs: xylans (food application). In: J. P. Kamalin, editor. Comprehensive glycoscience from chemistry to systems biology. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 653–89.
  • 16.Wood PJ. Oat and rye beta-glucan: properties and function. Cereal Chem 2010;87:315–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46:S33–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Asp N-G. Resistant starch—an update on its physiological effects. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997;427:201–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nilsson U, Öste R, Jägerstad M, Birkhed D. Cereal fructans: in vitro and in vivo studies on availability in rats and humans. J Nutr 1988;118:1325–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Englyst HN, Cummings JH. Digestion of polysaccharides in some cereal foods in the human small intestine. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:778–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Isaksson H, Landberg R, Sundberg B, Lundin E, Hallmans G, Zhang J-X, Tidehag P, Bach Knudsen KE, Moazzami AA, Åman P. High-fiber rye diet increases ileal excretion of energy and macronutrients compared with low-fiber wheat diet independent of meal frequency in ileostomy subjects. Food Nutr Res 2013;57:18519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lia Å, Sundberg B, Åman P, Sandberg A-S, Hallmans G, Andersson H. Substrates available for colonic fermentation from oat, barley and wheat bread diets: a study in ileostomy subjects. Br J Nutr 1996;76:797–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pettersson D, Åman P, Bach Knudsen KE, Lundin E, Zhang J-X, Hallmans G, Härkönen H. Intake of rye bread by ileostomists increases ileal excretion of fiber polysaccharide components and organic acids but does not increase plasma or urine lignans and isoflavonoids. J Nutr 1996;126:1594–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sundberg B, Wood P, Lia Å, Andersson H, Sandberg A-S, Hallmans G, Åman P. Mixed-linked β-glucan from breads of different cereals is partly degraded in the human ileostomy model. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;64:878–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Le Gall M, Eybye KL, Bach Knudsen KE. Molecular weight changes of arabinoxylans of wheat and rye incurred by the digestion processes in the upper gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Livest Sci 2010;134:72–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lærke HN, Pedersen C, Mortensen MA, Theil PK, Larsen T, Bach Knudsen KE. Rye bread reduces plasma cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolaemic pigs when compared to wheat at similar dietary fibre level. J Sci Food Agric 2008;88:1385–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bach Knudsen KE, Serena A, Kjaer AK, Jørgensen H, Engberg R. Rye bread enhances the production and plasma concentration of butyrate but not the plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin in pigs. J Nutr 2005;135:1696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Glitsø LV, Brunsgaard G, Hojsgaard S, Sandstrom B, Bach Knudsen KE. Intestinal degradation in pigs of rye dietary fibre with different structural characteristics. Br J Nutr 1998;80:457–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kasprzak MM, Lærke HN, Bach Knudsen KE. Effects of isolated and complex dietary fiber matrices in breads on carbohydrate digestibility and physiocochemical properties of ileal effluent from pigs. J Agric Food Chem 2012;60:12469–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bach Knudsen KE, Hessov I. Recovery of inulin from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) in the small intestine of man. Br J Nutr 1995;74:101–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Scott KP, Louis P. Interactions and competition within the microbial community of the human colon: links between diet and health. Environ Microbiol 2007;9:1101–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Louis P, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Flint HJ. Understanding the effects of diet on bacterial metabolism in the large intestine. J Appl Microbiol 2007;102:1197–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Flint HJ, Scott KP, Louis P, Duncan SH. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:577–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Scott KP, Gratz SW, Sheridan PO, Flint HJ, Duncan SH. The influence of diet on the gut microbiota. Pharmacol Res 2013;69:52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tap J, Mondot S, Levenez F, Pelletier E, Caron C, Furet JP, Ugarte E, Munoz-Tamayo R, Paslier DL, Nalin R, et al. Towards the human intestinal microbiota phylogenetic core. Environ Microbiol 2009;11:2574–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Walker AW, Ince J, Duncan SH, Webster LM, Holtrop G, Ze X, Brown D, Stares MD, Scott P, Bergerat A, et al. Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota. ISME J 2011;5:220–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bach Knudsen KE, Borg Jensen B, Hansen I. Digestion of polysaccharides and other major components in the small and large intestine of pigs fed on diets consisting of oat fractions rich in β-D-glucan. Br J Nutr 1993;70:537–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bach Knudsen KE, Jensen BB, Andersen JO, Hansen I. Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions. 2. Microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract. Br J Nutr 1991;65(2):233–48. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Glitsø LV, Gruppen H, Schols HA, Højsgaard S, Sandström B, Bach Knudsen KE. Degradation of rye arabinoxylans in the large intestine of pigs. J Sci Food Agric 1999;79:961–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Davis LM, Martinez I, Walter J, Goin C, Hutkins RW. Barcoded pyrosequencing reveals that consumption of galactooligosaccharides results in a highly specific bifidogenic response in humans. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e25200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martínez I, Kim J, Duffy PR, Schlegel VL, Walter J. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e15046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Costabile A, Klinder A, Fava F, Napolitano A, Fogliano V, Leonard C, Gibson GR, Tuohy KM. Whole-grain wheat breakfast cereal has a prebiotic effect on the human gut microbiota: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Br J Nutr 2008;99:110–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Christensen EG, Licht TR, Kristensen M, Bahl MI. Bifidogenic effect of whole-grain wheat during a 12-week energy-restricted dietary intervention in postmenopausal women. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013;67:1316–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 2014;505:559–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Macfarlane GT, Gibson GR, Cummings JH. Comparison of fermentation reactions in different regions of the human colon. J Appl Bacteriol 1992;72:57–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Duncan SH, Holtrop G, Lobley GE, Calder AG, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. Contribution of acetate to butyrate formation by human faecal bacteria. Br J Nutr 2004;91:915–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nielsen TS, Lærke HN, Theil PK, Sørensen JF, Saarinen M, Forssten S, Bach Knudsen KE. Diets high in resistant starch and arabinoxylan modulate digestion processes and SCFA pool size in the large intestine and faecal microbial composition in pigs. Br J Nutr 2014;112:1837–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ingerslev AK, Theil PK, Hedemann MS, Laerke HN, Bach Knudsen KE. Resistant starch and arabinoxylan augment SCFA absorption, but affect postprandial glucose and insulin responses differently. Br J Nutr 2014;111:1564–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Belobrajdic DP, Bird AR, Conlon MA, Williams BA, Kang S, McSweeney CS, Zhang D, Bryden WL, Gidley MJ, Topping DL. An arabinoxylan-rich fraction from wheat enhances caecal fermentation and protects colonocyte DNA against diet-induced damage in pigs. Br J Nutr 2012;107:1274–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lu ZX, Gibson PR, Muir JG, Fielding M, O'Dea K. Arabinoxylan fiber from a by-product of wheat flour processing behaves physiologically like a soluble, fermentable fiber in the large bowel of rats. J Nutr 2000;130:1984–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Duncan SH, Louis P, Thomson JM, Flint HJ. The role of pH in determining the species composition of the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol 2009;11:2112–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Damen B, Cloetens L, Broekaert WF, Francois I, Lescroart O, Trogh I, Arnaut F, Welling GW, Wijffels J, Delcour JA, et al. Consumption of breads containing in situ-produced arabinoxylan oligosaccharides alters gastrointestinal effects in healthy volunteers. J Nutr 2012;142:470–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gråsten S, Liukkonen KH, Chevatidis A, El-Nezami H, Poutanen KS, Mykkänen HM. Effects of wheat pentosan and inulin on the metabolic activity of fecal microbiota and on bowel function in healthy humans. Nutr Res 2003;23:1503–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Adam A, Levrat-Verny MA, Lopez HW, Leuillet M, Demigne C, Remesy C. Whole wheat and triticale flours with differing viscosities stimulate cecal fermentations and lower plasma and hepatic lipids in rats. J Nutr 2001;131:1770–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bach Knudsen KE, Jensen BB, Hansen I. Oat bran but not oat gum enhanced butyrate production in the large intestine of pigs. J Nutr 1993;123:1235–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Le Gall M, Serena A, Jørgensen H, Theil PK, Bach Knudsen KE. The role of whole-wheat grain and wheat and rye ingredients on the digestion and fermentation processes in the gut—a model experiment with pigs. Br J Nutr 2009;102:1590–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.McIntosh GH, Noakes M, Royle PJ, Foster PR. Whole-grain rye and wheat foods and markers of bowel health in overweight middle-aged men. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:967–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McIntosh GH, Royle PJ, Pointing G. Wheat aleurone flour increases cecal β-glucuronidase activity and butyrate concentration and reduces colon adenoma burden in azoxymethane-treated rats. J Nutr 2001;131:127–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hughes SA, Shewry PR, Li L, Gibson GR, Sanz ML, Rastall RA. In vitro fermentation by human fecal microflora of wheat arabinoxylans. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55:4589–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Salvador V, Cherbut C, Barry JL, Bertrand D, Bonnet C, Delort-Laval J. Sugar composition of dietary fibre and short-chain fatty acid production during in vitro fermentation by human bacteria. Br J Nutr 1993;70(1):189–97. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 61.Kaur A, Rose DJ, Rumpagaporn P, Patterson JA, Hamaker BR. In vitro batch fecal fermentation comparison of gas and short-chain fatty acid production using “slowly fermentable” dietary fibers. J Food Sci 2011;76:H137–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hallert C, Bjorck I, Nyman M, Pousette A, Granno C, Svensson H. Increasing fecal butyrate in ulcerative colitis patients by diet: controlled pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2003;9:116–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Berggren AM, Björck IME, Nyman EMGL, Eggum BO. Short-chain fatty acid content and pH in caecum of rats given various sources of carbohydrates. J Sci Food Agric 1993;63:397–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Arora T, Loo RL, Anastasovska J, Gibson GR, Tuohy KM, Sharma RK, Swann JR, Deaville ER, Sleeth ML, Thomas EL, et al. Differential effects of two fermentable carbohydrates on central appetite regulation and body composition. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e43263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bach Knudsen KE, Canibe N, Jørgensen H. Quantification of the absorption of nutrients deriving from carbohydrate assimilation: model experiment with catheterised pigs fed on wheat and oat based rolls. Br J Nutr 2000;84:449–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hooda S, Matte JJ, Vasanthan T, Zijlstra RT. Dietary oat beta-glucan reduces peak net glucose flux and insulin production and modulates plasma incretin in portal-vein catheterized grower pigs. J Nutr 2010;140:1564–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Theil PK, Jorgensen H, Serena A, Hendrickson J, Bach Knudsen KE. Products deriving from microbial fermentation are linked to insulinaemic response in pigs fed breads prepared from whole-wheat grain and wheat and rye ingredients. Br J Nutr 2011;105:373–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bach Knudsen KE, Serena A, Canibe N, Juntunen KS. New insight into butyrate metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc 2003;62:81–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cummings JH, Pomare EW, Branch WJ, Naylor CPE, MacFarlane GT. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut 1987;28:1221–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Roediger WEW. Oxidative and synthetic functions of n-butyrate in colonocytes. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:511–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Scheppach W, Weiler F. The butyrate story: old wine in new bottles? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2004;7:563–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hartvigsen ML, Laerke HN, Overgaard A, Holst JJ, Bach Knudsen KE, Hermansen K. Postprandial effects of test meals including concentrated arabinoxylan and whole grain rye in subjects with the metabolic syndrome: a randomised study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:567–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nilsson AC, Ostman EM, Knudsen KE, Holst JJ, Bjorck IM. A cereal-based evening meal rich in indigestible carbohydrates increases plasma butyrate the next morning. J Nutr 2010;140:1932–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Priebe MG, Wang H, Weening D, Schepers M, Preston T, Vonk RJ. Factors related to colonic fermentation of nondigestible carbohydrates of a previous evening meal increase tissue glucose uptake and moderate glucose-associated inflammation. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:90–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Robertson MD, Bickerton AS, Dennis AL, Vidal H, Frayn KN. Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(3):559–67. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 76.Hamer HM, Jonkers D, Venema K, Vanhoutvin S, Troost FJ, Brummer RJ. Review article: the role of butyrate on colonic function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;27:104–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kinoshita M, Suzuki Y, Saito Y. Butyrate reduces colonic paracellular permeability by enhancing PPARgamma activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;293(2):827–31. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 78.Hamer HM, Jonkers DM, Bast A, Vanhoutvin SA, Fischer MA, Kodde A, Troost FJ, Venema K, Brummer RJ. Butyrate modulates oxidative stress in the colonic mucosa of healthy humans. Clin Nutr 2009;28(1):88–93. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 79.Daly K, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Microarray analysis of butyrate regulated genes in colonic epithelial cells. DNA Cell Biol 2006;25:49–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sleeth ML, Thompson EL, Ford HE, Zac-Varghese SE, Frost G. Free fatty acid receptor 2 and nutrient sensing: a proposed role for fibre, fermentable carbohydrates and short-chain fatty acids in appetite regulation. Nutr Res Rev 2010;23:135–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Brown AJ, Goldsworthy SM, Barnes AA, Eilert MM, Tcheang L, Daniels D, Muir AI, Wigglesworth MJ, Kinghorn I, Fraser NJ, et al. The orphan G protein-coupled receptors GPR41 and GPR43 are activated by propionate and other short chain carboxylic acids. J Biol Chem 2003;278:11312–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ferchaud-Roucher V, Pouteau E, Piloquet H, Zair Y, Krempf M. Colonic fermentation from lactulose inhibits lipolysis in overweight subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005;289:E716–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Brighenti F, Benini L, Del Rio D, Casiraghi C, Pellegrini N, Scazzina F, Jenkins DJA, Vantini I. Colonic fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates contributes to the second-meal effect. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83:817–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Robertson MD, Bickerton AS, Dennis AL, Vidal H, Frayn KN. Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:559–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gao Z, Yin J, Zhang J, Ward RE, Martin RJ, Lefevre M, Cefalu WT, Ye J. Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice. Diabetes 2009;58:1509–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Robertson MD, Currie JM, Morgan LM, Jewell DP, Frayn KN. Prior short-term consumption of resistant starch enhances postprandial insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects. Diabetologia 2003;46:659–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Advances in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES