Key Clinical Message
The FOXP protein family (FOXP1-4) is a group of transcription factors that play important roles in embryological, immunological, hematological, and speech and language development. Here, we report FOXP1 de novo mutation and severe speech delay in an individual belonging to a non-Caucasian population.
Keywords: Exome, FOXP protein family, Haploinsufficiencies, Japanese
Introduction
The FOXP protein family (FOXP1-4) is a group of transcription factors that play an important role in embryological, immunological, hematological, and speech and language development 1. Le Fevre et al. 2 reviewed a total of 10 patients with de novo mutations of FOXP1 and showed that haploinsufficiencies of FOXP1 are associated with global developmental delay/mental retardation with moderate/severe speech delay. Here, we report the case of a Japanese female patient with severe speech delay and the identification of a de novo FOXP1 missense mutation by exome analysis.
Materials and Methods
Case report
The patient is a 22-year-old female and is the second-born child of nonconsanguineous Japanese parents. She has one healthy sister and no family history of mental retardation. She was born by normal vaginal delivery at 34 weeks gestation, and her birthweight was 2100 g (+0.1 SD). Her developmental delay was noted by a pediatrician when the patient was 1 year old. She started to walk alone at the age of 2. Development was globally delayed, especially in the area of speech and language acquisition. The patient's hearing and vision were normal, and no autistic features, developmental regression, or history of seizure were present. She began to menstruate at the age of 13. At the time of examination (22 years old), she displayed a short stature (141 cm, −3.2 SD, body weight 44.3 kg, −1.1 SD) and delayed speech (she was unable to speak), but her receptive language abilities were relatively developed as indicated by her understanding of relational concepts. She required assistance with routine daily activities, and hyperextension of her joints was observed. Chromosome analysis with G-banding showed a 46, XX karyotype. Her father's height is 171 cm and mother's height is 154 cm. Table1 shows the neurodevelopmental features of the patient in comparison with data presented by Le Fevre et al. 2.
Table 1.
Comparison of the neurodevelopmental features reported by Le Fevre et al. 2 and the patient in this study
| Symptoms | Le Fevre et al. 2 | Index case |
|---|---|---|
| De novo mutation | 5/5 | + |
| Low birthweight | 1/3 | + |
| FTT or small for age | 2/6 | − |
| Obesity | 2/6 | − |
| Prominent forehead | 4/8 | + |
| Down slanted palpebral fissures | 3/8 | − |
| Short nose with broad tip | 5/8 | + |
| Frontal hair upsweep | 2/8 | + |
| Prominent digit pads | 2/8 | − |
| Single palmar creases | 2/8 | − |
| Clinodactyly | 2/8 | − |
| Congenital malformation | 4/9 | − |
| Global delay | 10/10 | + |
| Regression | 1/2 | − |
| Intellectual delay | 8/8 | + |
| Gross motor delay | 9/9 | + |
| Speech and language delay | 10/10 | + |
| Expressive language more severely affected than receptive language | 7/7 | + |
| Articulation consonants | 5/5 | None |
| Poor grammar | 4/4 | None |
| Oro-motor dysfunction | 3/7 | − |
| Autistic feature | 3/4 | − |
| Autism | 2/4 | − |
| Behavioral problem | 4/5 | − |
| Tone | 2/3 | − |
| Reflexes | 1/3 | − |
| Seizures | 2/7 | − |
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee at the University of Tsukuba and was conducted according to the Principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from the parents.
Sequencing
Exome sequencing was performed, following the protocol described in the SureSelect Library prep kit (post-pool version 4; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). The DNA library was subjected to emulsion PCR (SOLiD™ EZ Bead™ Emulsifier kit; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) to generate clonal DNA fragments on beads, followed by bead enrichment (SOLiD™ EZ Bead™ Enrichment kit; Life Technologies). Enriched template beads were sequenced on a SOLiD 5500xl sequencer as single-end, 60-bp reads (Life Technologies). The SOLiD 5500xl output reads were aligned against the human genome reference sequence (hg19) using LifeScope version 2.5.1 (Life Technologies) to generate BAM files. Variant calling was performed following the Best Practices specified in the Genome Analysis Toolkit 3 (GATK, version 2.7.4), Picard (http://picard.sourceforge.net) and SAMtools 4, and only reads that mapped to a unique position in the reference genome were used.
A total of 68,391 variants were detected in the patient. We first filtered out the variants with low-quality values generated by GATK output, resulting in a new total of 62,200 variants. To distinguish potentially pathogenic variants from other variants, we filtered out variants in our in-house references (57 exome samples), public data from dbSNP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/, version 137), and a 1000-genome database 5. After this filtering step was applied, 393 variants remained. We then used ANNOVAR software to filter out synonymous variants and intronic variants because they are less likely to be pathogenic 6, which resulted in 84 remaining variants. We then used SIFT 7, Polyphen2 8, LRT 9, or MutationTaster 10 software to predict the potential impact of an amino acid substitution on the function of human proteins, and we filtered out “benign” missense mutations as defined by the above-mentioned software. A total of 13 single-nucleotide variants and one frame-shift variant remained after this step (Table2).
Table 2.
Results of the exome sequence and confirmation by Sanger sequencing
| Gene | Chr | Position | Base change | Amino acid change (RefSeq Number) | De novo1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPR52 | 1 | 174418259 | C>T | T337I (NM_005684) | Not detected |
| MYOG | 1 | 203055040 | T>C | Y17C (NM_002479) | |
| IARS2 | 1 | 220315180 | G>A | R817H (NM_018060) | |
| ITGA4 | 2 | 182374460 | C>T | R591X (NM_000885) | |
| EML4 | 2 | 42556883 | C>T | H770Y (NM_001145076) | |
| FOXP1 | 3 | 71102906 | T>C | M1V (NM_001244813) | De novo |
| FHDC1 | 4 | 153896905 | C>A | S821Y (NM_033393) | |
| PRKAA1 | 5 | 40765057 | G>A | R369W (NM_006251) | De novo |
| SPERT | 13 | 46287405 | G>A | R82H (NM_152719) | Not detected |
| MCTP2 | 15 | 94899522 | A>G | K388E (NM_001159643) | |
| TRPV3 | 17 | 3419802 | C>T | R716Q (NM_001258205) | |
| ALOX12 | 17 | 6908595 | G>A | R394H (NM_000697) | |
| USP36 | 17 | 76832441 | G>A | P2L (NM_025090) | |
| COCH | 14 | 31358916 | AAG>A | COCH (NM_001135058) |
Not detected; mutations detected in the exome data analysis but not confirmed by Sanger sequencing, de novo; mutations detected in the patient but not present in either parent.
We performed direct sequencing to evaluate these 14 candidate mutations using DNA obtained from the patient and her parents. Among these, two mutations (SPERT and GRP52) were not confirmed by direct sequencing. Ten of the mutations existed in at least one of the healthy parents, suggesting that they are unlikely to be pathogenic. Two of the mutations, FOXP1 and PRKAA1, were unique to the patient.
Discussion
It has been demonstrated that the use of next-generation sequencing techniques provides a high success rate in the diagnosis of unidentified genetic conditions. Need et al. performed exome sequencing on DNA from 12 patients with unexplained and apparent genetic conditions, which resulted in a diagnosis of a likely genetic origin of the condition in six of the 12 patients 11. Exome sequencing has also been applied in autopsies of patients with sudden unexplained death and has been used to successfully identify mutations related to cardiac arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy 12. Therefore, exome is becoming a powerful tool for the diagnosis of patients with unexplained conditions.
The FOXP protein family (FOXP1-4) is a group of transcription factors that play an important role in embryological, immunological, hematological, and speech and language development 1. FOXP2 was the first gene to be associated with severe speech disorders. It was identified using a three-generation pedigree in which a severe speech and language disorder was transmitted as an autosomal-dominant monogenic trait 13. Subsequently, many de novo and familial cases of severe speech disorders associated with FOXP2 mutations have been reported, and mutations in FOXP2 are well known to cause developmental speech and language disorders 14.
Because FOXP1 and FOXP2 form heterodimers for transcriptional regulation, it has been suggested that they cooperate in common neurodevelopmental pathways through the coregulation of common targets 15. Vernes et al. screened for mutations in FOXP1 genes with a denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography method using DNA from 49 patients with developmental verbal dyspraxia. They found one missense mutation (P215A) in one patient, but P215A was also identified in an unaffected sibling of the patient 16, which suggests that P215A is unlikely to be pathogenic. Hamdan et al. identified two patients with de novo FOXP1 mutations that caused haploinsufficiency and suggested that decreased expression of FOXP1 has a more global impact on brain development than does decreased expression of FOXP2 17. Subsequently, mutations in FOXP1 have been reported to be associated with global developmental delay, intellectual disability, and speech defects 2,17–21. As noted by Le Fevre et al., the most consistent feature of a FOXP1 mutation is global developmental delay with prominent speech delay, which was also observed in the present case study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a FOXP1 de novo mutation in an individual with severe speech delay who belongs to a non-Caucasian population. All of the previously reported FOXP1 mutations as well as the one in this study occurred de novo, suggesting that haploinsufficiency of FOXP1 reduces fitness. In addition, some characteristic features of FOXP1 mutations, such as speech delay, a prominent forehead, a short nose with a broad tip, and frontal hair upsweep, were concordant with the phenotype of the patient in this study.
PRKAA1 is a catalytic subunit of the 5′-prime-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK is a cellular energy sensor conserved in all eukaryotic cells, and AMPK regulates the activities of a number of key metabolic enzymes through phosphorylation. Variations in PRKAA1 have been reported to be associated with diabetes 22, cancer 23–25, coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes 26, and open-angle glaucoma 27. However, no reports have shown an association between PRKAA1 mutations and developmental delay. Although mutations in PRKAA1 or other genes may contribute to the patient's symptoms, it appears likely that the patient's severe speech delay may have been caused by a de novo missense mutation of the FOXP1 gene based on results of previous studies. Next-generation sequencing techniques can provide information that is essential for the molecular diagnosis of patients with unexplained conditions.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the patient and the parents for participating in the study. This work was supported by the management expenses grants, University of Tsukuba. Authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interests.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
References
- Benayoun BA, Caburet S. Veitia RA. Forkhead transcription factors: key players in health and disease. Trends Genet. 2011;27:224–232. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Fevre AK, Taylor S, Malek NH, Horn D, Carr CW, Abdul-Rahman OA, et al. FOXP1 mutations cause intellectual disability and a recognizable phenotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2013;161:3166–3175. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, Handsaker RE, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491:56–65. doi: 10.1038/nature11632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang K, Li M. Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar P, Henikoff S. Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:1073–1081. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chun S. Fay JC. Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. Genome Res. 2009;19:1553–1561. doi: 10.1101/gr.092619.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz JM, Rodelsperger C, Schuelke M. Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:575–576. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0810-575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Need AC, Shashi V, Hitomi Y, Schoch K, Shianna KV, McDonald MT, et al. Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions. J. Med. Genet. 2012;49:353–361. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bagnall RD, Das KJ, Duflou J. Semsarian C. Exome analysis-based molecular autopsy in cases of sudden unexplained death in the young. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:655–662. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lai CS, Fisher SE, Hurst JA, Vargha-Khadem F. Monaco AP. A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature. 2001;413:519–523. doi: 10.1038/35097076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham SA. Fisher SE. Decoding the genetics of speech and language. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2013;23:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bacon C. Rappold GA. The distinct and overlapping phenotypic spectra of FOXP1 and FOXP2 in cognitive disorders. Hum. Genet. 2012;131:1687–1698. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1193-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vernes SC, MacDermot KD, Monaco AP. Fisher SE. Assessing the impact of FOXP1 mutations on developmental verbal dyspraxia. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;17:1354–1358. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamdan FF, Daoud H, Rochefort D, Piton A, Gauthier J, Langlois M, et al. De novo mutations in FOXP1 in cases with intellectual disability, autism, and language impairment. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;87:671–678. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carr CW, Moreno-De-Luca D, Parker C, Zimmerman HH, Ledbetter N, Martin CL, et al. Chiari I malformation, delayed gross motor skills, severe speech delay, and epileptiform discharges in a child with FOXP1 haploinsufficiency. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;18:1216–1220. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horn D, Kapeller J, Rivera-Brugues N, Moog U, Lorenz-Depiereux B, Eck S, et al. Identification of FOXP1 deletions in three unrelated patients with mental retardation and significant speech and language deficits. Hum. Mutat. 2010;31:E1851–E1860. doi: 10.1002/humu.21362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palumbo O, D'Agruma L, Minenna AF, Palumbo P, Stallone R, Palladino T, et al. 3p14.1 de novo microdeletion involving the FOXP1 gene in an adult patient with autism, severe speech delay and deficit of motor coordination. Gene. 2013;516:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.12.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pariani MJ, Spencer A, Graham JM., Jr Rimoin DL. A 785 kb deletion of 3p14.1p13, including the FOXP1 gene, associated with speech delay, contractures, hypertonia and blepharophimosis. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2009;52:123–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jablonski KA, McAteer JB, de Bakker PI, Franks PW, Pollin TI, Hanson RL, et al. Common variants in 40 genes assessed for diabetes incidence and response to metformin and lifestyle intervention in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes. 2010;59:2672–2681. doi: 10.2337/db10-0543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campa D, Claus R, Dostal L, Stein A, Chang-Claude J, Meidtner K, et al. Variation in genes coding for AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and breast cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation on Cancer (EPIC) Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011;127:761–767. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1269-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi Y, Hu Z, Wu C, Dai J, Li H, Dong J, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for non-cardia gastric cancer at 3q13.31 and 5p13.1. Nat. Genet. 2011;43:1215–1218. doi: 10.1038/ng.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman AE, Demanelis K, Fu A, Zheng T. Zhu Y. Association of AMP-activated protein kinase with risk and progression of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:736–744. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma X, Zhang J, Deng R, Ding S, Gu N, Guo X, et al. Synergistic effect of smoking with genetic variants in the AMPKalpha1 gene on the risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2014;30:483–488. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang JH, Loomis SJ, Yaspan BL, Bailey JC, Weinreb RN, Lee RK, et al. Vascular tone pathway polymorphisms in relation to primary open-angle glaucoma. Eye (Lond.) 2014;28:662–671. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
