Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Jan 14;114(3):256–257.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.12.004

Association between allergic sensitization and exhaled nitric oxide in children in the School Inner-City Asthma Study

Devika R Rao 1, Joanne E Sordillo 2, Lianne S Kopel 3,5,6, Jonathan M Gaffin 3,5,6, William J Sheehan 4,5,6, Elaine Hoffman 6,7, Al Ozonoff 8,9, Diane R Gold 2,6, Wanda Phipatanakul 2,4,5,6
PMCID: PMC4352386  NIHMSID: NIHMS648739  PMID: 25595887

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is increased in children with asthma and is thought to reflect eosinophilic lung inflammation.1, 2 It is not known whether sensitization to one particular allergen is more strongly associated with worsened lung inflammation over any other particular allergen. Our aim was to determine whether children with asthma and allergic sensitization have higher levels of lung inflammation as measured by FeNO compared to children without allergic sensitization, and whether sensitization to one specific allergen was most predictive of elevated FeNO in a school-based setting.

We studied 128 children consecutively enrolled in the School Inner-City Asthma Study (SICAS) from 2008–2012 for whom we obtained skin prick testing for indoor allergens, outdoor allergens and FeNO (NIOX TM System, Aerocrine, Sweden). Further details regarding SICAS methods have been previously reported3. The FeNO was obtained at the same time as the skin prick testing utilizing standard methods3, and a wheal size of >3 mm compared with a saline control was used to define a positive sensitization test. FeNO was collected according to standard ATS procedures.4 The primary outcome was FeNO, and the logarithmic value of FeNO was used to obtain an approximately normal distribution. We performed an independent t-test of the mean FeNO (log transformed) between sensitized and unsensitized children, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare untransformed FeNO levels in sensitized vs. unsensitized children. Univariate regression was utilized to determine the relationship between sensitization to allergens and FeNO (log transformed). In the multiple regression model, we adjusted for age, gender, inhaled corticosteroid use and multiple sensitizations, all variables that were significantly associated with model outcome. Analyses were conducted using SPSS version 19 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) and SAS v9.2 (Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2011).

The mean FeNO level was 24.75 ppb, and the median was 15 ppb (range, 5–143) for the 128 children studied (eTable 1). Only 6% of children were white, while 40.6% and 28.1% of children were black and Hispanic respectively. The mean age at the time of FeNO measurement was 8.8 years. Over 70% of SICAS children were sensitized to more than one allergen, and over 60% were sensitized to more than two allergens. The most common allergens to which children were sensitized were cat (40.6%), dust mite (35%), tree pollen (32%), mouse (37.5%), cockroach (24.2%), grass (25%), rat (25.8%) and ragweed (20.3%).

We found that log-transformed FeNO significantly increased as the number of positive skin prick tests per child increased. Mean FeNO levels (ppb) were significantly different between those children with no sensitization and those children with 1–3, 4–5 and ≥ 6 positive skin prick tests. In comparing FeNO levels between children with and without sensitization to specific indoor allergens, we found that for cat, mouse, dust mite, rat and cockroach, the FeNO levels were significantly higher in children who were sensitized to that specific allergen compared to those who were not.

Sensitization to cat, rat, mouse, tree pollen, dust mite, and cockroach were significant predictors of increased FeNO in the univariate model (Table 1). When adjusted for age, gender, inhaled corticosteroid use, asthma control and multiple sensitizations (more than one positive skin prick test), sensitization to cat and rat allergen were significant predictors of increased FeNO with p values of <0.01 and 0.016 respectively.

Table 1.

Predictors of FeNO, Multivariate regression; Outcome is the natural log of FeNO

Allergic Sensitization Univariate Regression
Multiple Regression
B coefficient Standard Error P value B coefficient Standard Error P value
Intercept
Cat 0.785 0.122 <0.0001 0.401 0.153 0.01
Rat 0.738 0.143 <0.0001 0.440 0.183 0.016
Mouse 0.641 0.130 <0.0001 −0.105 0.178 0.557
Multiple sensitizationsa 0.370b 0.052 <0.0001
 1–3 0.402 0.147 0.006
 4–5 0.357 0.216 0.099
 ≥ 6 0.608 0.226 0.007

Adjusted for age, gender, inhaled corticosteroid use, and asthma control

a

# sensitizations binned into the following categories for # positive skin tests: 0, 1–3, 4–5, ≥ 6

b

sensitizations used as single predictor in univariate analysis

Our study focused on the relationship between allergic sensitization and FeNO levels, an objective measure of lung inflammation in children with asthma. The children enrolled in SICAS were highly allergic, with over 70% being sensitized to more than one allergen. This high degree of allergic sensitization translated to higher FeNO levels in comparison to unsensitized children. The mean FeNO for our cohort was above 20 ppb (24.75 ppb), indicating that significant eosinophilic airway inflammation is likely present.5 In attempting to identify which allergens contribute most to elevated FeNO levels, we found sensitization to cat and rat, and also multiple sensitizations to be significant independent predictors of increased FeNO after adjusting for age, gender and ICS use. To our knowledge, no other studies have shown sensitization to rat allergen to be a significant independent predictor of increased FeNO levels, adjusting for other factors. There may be unique characteristics of this allergen that correlate with allergic airway inflammation.

In our multiple regression model, sensitization to six or more allergens carried the strongest beta-coefficient of 0.608. This is in contrast to some studies that have demonstrated that sensitization to specific allergens such as dust mite are major determinants of increased FeNO in children.6 Our study highlights the importance of rat allergen sensitization as well and the dose-response relationship of polysensitization and airway inflammation.

Other studies have demonstrated that sensitization to multiple specific allergens is associated with elevated FeNO levels79, and our study adds to this body of literature by confirming this relationship in a population that is more diverse compared to other communities that have been studied. Our results are therefore generalizable to other diverse, urban populations with a high proportion of non-white ethnicities.

The clinical implications of our results are important. A study from the National Cooperative Inner City Asthma Study showed that children with asthma who were both exposed and sensitized to rat allergen had higher rates of hospitalization and unscheduled doctor visits.10 Our study adds to these findings by showing that sensitization to rat allergy also predicts airway inflammation. Finding that rat and multiple sensitization predicts high FeNO levels is important as FeNO levels have been shown to be predictive of asthma exacerbations.11

We acknowledge that we are limited by sample size in that limited resources allowed us to obtain FeNO in a subset of children.

We found that in our school-based cohort of ethnically diverse, highly allergic children, that FeNO levels were predicted by cat and rat sensitization, and most strongly by having multiple sensitizations. Future studies should be aimed at reducing cat and rat allergen exposure and assessing the effect on asthma morbidity as well as markers of airway inflammation

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

Funding Source: This study was supported by grants R01 AI 073964, R01 AI 073964-02S1, and K24 AI 106822 from the National Institutes of Health (PI Phipatanakul) and U10HL098102, as well as K23AI106945 (PI Gaffin).

Abbreviations

FeNO

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide

SICAS

School Inner-City Asthma Study

Footnotes

Contribution of each author:

Devika R. Rao: Dr. Rao conceptualized and designed the study, performed data analysis and result interpretation, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Joanne E. Sordillo: Dr. Sordillo aided with data analysis and result interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Lianne S. Kopel: Dr. Kopel aided with data analysis and result interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Jonathan M. Gaffin: Dr. Gaffin contributed to study design, aided with data analysis and result interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

William J. Sheehan: Dr. Sheehan contributed to study design, aided with result interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Elaine Hoffman: Dr. Hoffman Ozonoff aided with data analysis, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Al Ozonoff: Dr. Ozonoff aided with data analysis, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Diane R. Gold: Dr. Gold contributed to study design, aided with data analysis and result interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Wanda Phipatanakul: Dr. Phipatanakul conceptualized and designed the School Inner City Asthma Study, organized acquisition of data, aided with result interpretation, and reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Fitzpatrick AM, Gaston BM, Erzurum SC, Teague WG National Institutes of Health/National Heart L , Blood Institute Severe Asthma Research P. Features of severe asthma in school-age children: Atopy and increased exhaled nitric oxide. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(6):1218–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Covar RA, Szefler SJ, Martin RJ, et al. Relations between exhaled nitric oxide and measures of disease activity among children with mild-to-moderate asthma. J Pediatr. 2003;142(5):469–475. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2003.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Phipatanakul W, Bailey A, Hoffman EB, et al. The school inner-city asthma study: design, methods, and lessons learned. J Asthma. 2011;48(10):1007–1014. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.624235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(8):912–930. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200406-710ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dweik RA, Boggs PB, Erzurum SC, et al. An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(5):602–615. doi: 10.1164/rccm.9120-11ST. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Crane J, Lampshire P, Wickens K, et al. Asthma, atopy and exhaled nitric oxide in a cohort of 6-yr-old New Zealand children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(1):59–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sordillo JE, Webb T, Kwan D, et al. Allergen exposure modifies the relation of sensitization to FENO levels in children at risk for allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(5):1165–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jackson DJ, Vimig CM, Gangnon RE, et al. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements are most closely associated with allergic sensitization in school aged children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(5):949–953. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hanson JR, DeLurgio SA, Williams DD, Dinakar C. Office-based exhaled nitric oxide measurement in children 4 years of age and older. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;(5):358–363. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perry T, Matsui E, Merriman B, Duong T, Eggleston P. The prevalence of rat allergen in inner-city homes and its relationship to sensitization and asthma morbidity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(2):346–352. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zacharasiewicz A, Wilson N, Lex C, et al. Clinical use of noninvasive measurements of airway inflammation in steroid reduction in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(10):1077–1082. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1242OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES