Skip to main content
Advances in Wound Care logoLink to Advances in Wound Care
. 2015 Mar 1;4(3):137–151. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0509

Neuroinflammatory Mechanisms of Connective Tissue Fibrosis: Targeting Neurogenic and Mast Cell Contributions

Michael J Monument 1, David A Hart 1, Paul T Salo 1, A Dean Befus 2, Kevin A Hildebrand 1,,*
PMCID: PMC4352697  PMID: 25785237

Abstract

Significance: The pathogenesis of fibrogenic wound and connective tissue healing is complex and incompletely understood. Common observations across a vast array of human and animal models of fibroproliferative conditions suggest neuroinflammatory mechanisms are important upstream fibrogenic events.

Recent Advances: As detailed in this review, mast cell hyperplasia is a common observation in fibrotic tissue. Recent investigations in human and preclinical models of hypertrophic wound healing and post-traumatic joint fibrosis provides evidence that fibrogenesis is governed by a maladaptive neuropeptide-mast cell-myofibroblast signaling pathway.

Critical Issues: The blockade and manipulation of these factors is providing promising evidence that if timed correctly, the fibrogenic process can be appropriately regulated. Clinically, abnormal fibrogenic healing responses are not ubiquitous to all patients and the identification of those at-risk remains an area of priority.

Future Directions: Ultimately, an integrated appreciation of the common pathobiology shared by many fibrogenic connective tissue conditions may provide a scientific framework to facilitate the development of novel antifibrotic prevention and treatment strategies.


graphic file with name fig-4.jpg

Kevin A. Hildebrand MD, FRCSC

Scope and Significance

Connective tissue fibrosis is a principal pathogenic process involved in a vast array of human conditions. Unfortunately, many of these conditions are highly recalcitrant to system and local treatment strategies, highlighting the need for an improved scientific and biological understanding of fibrogenesis. Integrating information obtained from clinical studies, animal models, and basic science investigations has identified numerous profibrotic molecular pathways common to many fibrogenic human conditions. Targeted strategies derived from these studies may have profound therapeutic consequences applicable to a large spectrum of similar diseases.

Translational Relevance

Hypertrophic wound healing and post-traumatic joint fibrosis are examples of two acquired human conditions characterized by aberrant fibrogenic healing responses. Recent evidence from human and animal studies suggests a neuro-inflammatory axis mediated by neuropeptides and mast cell signaling functions as an important upstream fibrogenic stimulus in these conditions. Other models of fibrosis also support these observations. Using validated preclinical models antifibrotic therapies targeting this neuroinflammatory axis are yielding promising results.

Clinical Relevance

Novel antifibrotic therapies are under development for human use. Importantly, these therapies may be most efficacious in preventing fibrosis and less effective in those with established disease. This highlights the need to further identify at-risk populations.

Overview

The connective tissue healing response is a complex myriad of cellular and biochemical events essential to virtually every human structure and organ derived from mesoderm. Connective tissue repair progresses via a series of confluent, yet biologically distinct phases of hemostasis, inflammation, cellular proliferation, matrix synthesis, and tissue remodeling (reviewed in Diegelmann and Evans1 and Reinke and Sorg). Under normal conditions, equilibrium is established between matrix synthesis, and tissue remodeling, which ultimately enables the injured tissue or organ to heal and regain near normal function. Unfortunately in many fibroproliferative conditions, this equilibrium is lost or never established, and the abnormal connective tissue healing response becomes maladaptive. Strictures, adhesions, keloids, hypertrophic scars, and post-traumatic joint contractures are all common examples of abnormal, excessive, or unwanted connective tissue healing patterns observed after traumatic or surgical insults. Persistent inflammation, tissue hypoxia, and abnormal mechanical forces associated with a variety of acute and chronic conditions are also common atraumatic causes of connective tissue fibrosis typified by renal, pulmonary, and cardiac fibrosis. Despite a detailed understanding of the biological events essential for physiologic connective tissue repair, the mechanisms by which the normal regulatory controls of these processes are circumvented in fibroproliferative conditions remain obscure.

Discussion

Connective tissue fibrosis

Fibrogenic healing pathways are a manifestation of a dynamic interaction between numerous cell types, growth factors, cytokines, mechanical stimuli, and constituents of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in response to various reactive or reparative stimuli. The terminal consequence of these interactions is a pattern of excessive and disorganized collagen deposition, resulting in permanent tissue and organ dysfunction. Decades of research have consistently demonstrated three central histological components of tissue fibrogenesis: myofibroblast hyperplasia, upregulated fibrogenic growth factors/cytokines, and dysregulated collagen homeostasis.

Myofibroblasts and fibrosis

The myofibroblast is regarded as the principal effector cell in connective tissue fibrosis, responsible for collagen deposition, growth factor liberation, and mechanical wound contraction.3,4 Myofibroblast hyperplasia is a common observation in virtually all fibroproliferative conditions such as Dupuytren's contracture of the hand, hypertrophic wound healing, burn scar hypertrophy, post-traumatic joint contractures, scleroderma, idiopathic frozen shoulder, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hepatic, myocardial, and renal fibrosis.3–12

Myofibroblasts are specialized mesenchymal-derived cells, characterized by the unique expression of the contractile protein, alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA).3 Typically regarded as a differentiated cell type derived from the fibroblast lineage,13,14 myofibroblastic differentiation has also been observed from a variety of non-fibroblastic precursors such as hepatic satellite cells,15 bone marrow-derived fibrocytes,16 and epithelial cells via an epithelial–mesenchymal transition.17

The activated myofibroblast is known to remodel the ECM through a combination of three principal mechanisms: mechanical contraction of the ECM via adherent α-SMA populated stress fibers; the synthesis and deposition of additional collagen fibers; and liberation of pro-fibrotic, pro-inflammatory, and pro-angiogenic factors.3,18,19 In the context of normal physiologic wound healing, fibroblasts migrate into the wound bed, myofibroblast differentiation and proliferation ensues, which facilitates wound contraction and once epithelialization of the wound is complete, granulation myofibroblasts disappear through a regulated process of apoptosis.3,4,20 In fibroproliferative disorders, it remains unclear whether the normal pathways of myofibroblast apoptosis are impeded, or the signals responsible for myofibroblast activation and proliferation are sustained, or both.

Pro-fibrotic growth factors and cytokines

Numerous soluble factors such as transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1), connective tissue growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), angiotensin II, vascular endothelial growth factor, and Th2-type cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-21) are recognized pro-fibrotic mediators.21,22 Of these, TGF-β1 is certainly the most understood and investigated pro-fibrotic growth factor for numerous reasons. TGF-β1 is an essential regulator of tissue homeostasis, with pro-inflammatory and anabolic growth properties. It is synthesized and liberated by a diverse array of cell types, and also resides within connective tissue in a latent form, activated by mechanical or enzymatic disruption of the ECM.23 Further, TGF-β1 is a potent fibroblast chemoattractant and mitogen, is a key signal for the induction of the myofibroblast phenotype, stimulates matrix molecule synthesis, and inhibits myofibroblast apoptosis.4,13,24–27 Elevated levels of TGF-β1 and TGF-β1 receptors are routinely observed in various human and animal models of hypertrophic scar formation, burn scar hypertrophy, post-radiation skin fibrosis, and post-traumatic joint fibrosis.28–37 Similarly, in cardiac and renal fibrosis, upregulation of TGF-β1 and the renin-angiotensin system has been shown to cooperatively mediate perivascular fibrosis and organ dysfunction (reviewed in Rosenkranz38 and Lan39).

Alternatively, anti-TGF-β1 strategies (monoclonal antibodies, soluble TGF-β receptor complexes, antisense TGF-β1 oligonucleotides, small molecule inhibitors, and interferon therapy [IFN-α and IFN-γ]) have also been shown to decrease collagen hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration, wound contraction, neovascularization, and other manifestations of fibrosis across in a variety of preclinical models of hypertrophic wound healing;40,41 burn wound hypertrophy;36,42 scleroderma;43 and cardiac, pulmonary, and renal fibrosis.44–46 Collectively, these data clearly demonstrate an integral role of TGF-β1 in connective tissue fibrosis, although unfortunately, these promising preclinical results have not been recapitulated in recent human clinical trials,47,48 although several trials remain ongoing. Additionally, given the exceptionally broad range of fundamental biological activities ascribed to TGF-β1 signaling such as wound healing,49 fracture repair,50 and immunity,51 upstream mediators of excessive TGF-β1 synthesis and signaling may serve as more promising post-traumatic antifibrotic therapeutic targets.

ECM organization and remodeling

Irrespective of upstream cellular and pro-fibrotic signaling, connective tissue fibrosis is a direct consequence of excessive and disorganized collagen deposition. Collagen is the principal organic constituent of the ECM; type I collagen is the most ubiquitous isoform in connective tissue where other collagen types are present in variable amounts in a tissue-dependent distribution. During physiologic connective tissue healing responses, early inflammatory phase healing is characterized by the deposition of collagen types I and III and as healing matures and remodeling proceeds, type III collagen is largely replaced by a more organized and mechanically superior weave of collagen type I.2 In hypertrophic wound healing and other fibroproliferative conditions, several abnormalities of collagen homeostasis are observed: there is a net increase in overall collagen content, collagen structure is disorganized, and there is a greater overall contribution of type III collagen.35,52–56 Many of the aforementioned upstream cellular and soluble pro-fibrotic messengers likely contribute to this collagen imbalance, however, equally important to this process are matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). Collagen turnover is highly dependent on these proteolytic enzymes and in fibrotic disease, collagen hyperplasia is augmented by an anabolic MMP:TIMP ratio.54,57–59 Although beyond the scope of this review, exogenous manipulation of local and systemic MMP:TIMP ratios is an intensifying field of research with promising downstream applications in fibrotic disease and other human conditions.

Mast cell contributions to inflammatory disease and fibrosis

For many years now, mast cell hyperplasia has been a common observation within fibrotic tissue, often adherent to or in close apposition to myofibroblasts.6,10,60 Increased mast cell numbers have been documented in human and animal models of hypertrophic scar formation, post-traumatic joint fibrosis, burn fibrosis, intraperitoneal adhesions, scleroderma, esophageal strictures, and pulmonary/cardiac/renal fibrosis.61–66 However, the events responsible for pathologic mast cell recruitment and the contribution of these cells to the global fibrogenic process are primitively understood.

Mast cell biology

Mast cells originates within the bone marrow and circulate as a CD34 positive cluster cell, only to terminally differentiate after extravasation in peripheral tissues.60,67 This is distinctly different from basophils and eosinophils, which mature in marrow and rarely enter peripheral tissues unless appropriately stimulated.68 In humans, virtually every organ is populated with a small population of mast cells. Mast cells are particularly abundant within the mucosal and connective tissues of the skin, lung, and gut. The close proximity of these cells to small venules and capillaries enables the products of mast cell degranulation to have profound consequences on the dynamics of local microcirculation. Activated mast cells induce changes in vascular permeability and cause vasodilatation, but in addition to this, mast cells activate neighboring endothelial cells, leading to the expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines needed for leukocyte rolling, adhesion, activation, and transmigration.69,70 Consequently, the mast cell is recognized as a key member in the initiation and propagation of inflammatory responses. The identification of mast cells during the process of wound repair and in sites of matrix degradation supports the role of these cells connective tissue repair and remodeling.71–73

Microscopically, mast cells are easily identified by the appearance of large heterogeneous granules, densely packed within the cell cytoplasm.74,75 Within these granules resides a plethora of vasoactive substances, proteases and inflammatory mediators. The most notable of these include histamine and the neutral proteases, tryptase, and chymase. In humans, mast cells are classified according to the presence or absence of chymase within their granules: tryptase- and chymase-positive mast cells (MCTC) and tryptase positive, chymase-negative mast cells (MCT). MCTC mast cells are commonly localized to the skin, synovium, joint capsule, subcutaneous tissue, and the submusocal layers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.76–78 MCT mast cells, on the other hand, populate mucosal surfaces of the GI tract and lung and is also associated with allergic and parasitic disease.74,79 Terminal differentiation of CD34-positive mast cell precursors depends on activation of the cell surface receptor (c-kit) via binding of its ligand, stem cell factor (SCF). In humans and rodents, SCF is a potent chemoattractant and mitogen for mast cells and is directly responsible for mast cell proliferation within peripheral tissues.80–82 The mechanisms by which mast cells terminally differentiate into MCTC and MCT phenotypes is still under investigation at present, but is likely governed by the cytokines present within the local environment.83

Mast cell mediators

The complexity of mast cell physiology is exemplified by the vast array of vasoactive, immunogenic, and pro-inflammatory mediators synthesized and liberated by mast cell populations. These mediators can broadly be categorized into preformed and de novo synthesized compounds. Histamine accounts for roughly 10–15% of the dry granule weight and is potent mediator of allergic responses.84 Its effects are mediated through histamine receptors (H1–H4) and include vasodilatation, bronchoconstriction, pain, and pruritis. Histamine also causes the release of substance P (SP) from type C unmyelinated nerve fibers. This potentiates histamine release, as SP is also a potent mast cell secretagogue.85 In addition to histamine, tryptase, and chymase, are major constituents of mast cell granules, with tryptase being the most abundant mast cell synthetic product. Apart from sparse levels in basophils, tryptase is also mast cell specific.76,84 The natural in vivo substrate of tryptase remains unclear. Actions of chymase include conversion of angiotensin I into angiotensin II, inactivation of bradykinin and degradation of ECM components such as collagen type IV and laminin.86,87

Mast cells are also rich sources of numerous cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Notables include IL-1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and IFN-γ. TNF-α can be newly synthesized and is also stored in mast cell granules.88 TGF-β appears to be constitutively expressed by mast cells and is also liberated into the local environment after stimulation with calcium ionophores, suggesting it may be associated with intracellular storage.89 Other notable growth factors include PDGF and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Lipid-derived mediators of acute inflammation, such as platelet activating factor (PAF), prostaglandins, and leukotrienes are also rapidly synthesized by mast cells after cellular activation.

Mast cell activation

The traditional pathway of mast cell activation occurs via antigen binding to immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies bound to the high-affinity IgE receptor, FcɛRI located on the mast cell membrane. Antigen binding induces IgE cross-linking that results in aggregation and internalization of the FcɛRI receptor. This stimulates a rapid intracellular cascade of events that triggers secretory granule exocytosis, lipid metabolism (used to synthesize prostaglandins, PAF, and leukotrienes), and the production of pro-inflammatory transcription factors. These events are collectively mediated by changes in the release of intracellular calcium stores, an influx of extracellular calcium, a transient rise and fall in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), and rapid reorganization of the cytoskeleton.74,90,91 Mast cells can also be activated by a variety of other molecules via IgE-independent pathways. This includes activated components of the complement cascade (C3a);92 neuropeptides such as SP, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP);85,93 superoxide anion; opiates; and various cytokines and chemokines.74,94

Mast cells and connective tissue fibrosis

Mast cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of fibrotic conditions based on a growing collection of data from in vitro studies and numerous human and animal disease models. Mast cell hyperplasia has been observed in fibrotic tissues, often in association with myofibroblast hyperplasia.9,10,61,95–100 Mast cells have been visualized to be in intimate contact with fibroblasts and these cells can directly adhere to one another, possibly via c-kit/membrane-bound SCF interactions.6,100,101 Myofibroblasts and fibroblasts can also secrete SCF into the local environment, which is a known mitogen and chemoattractant of mast cells.102,103 Interestingly, in wounds that heal with minimal scarring, such as fetal wounds and wounds involving the oral mucosa, fewer mast cells are observed.104,105

Several important profibrotic growth factors synthesized and secreted by mast cells include bFGF, PDGF, and TGF-β1.84,106 Fibroblasts cocultured with activated mast cells will contract collagen gels significantly more, synthesize more collagen, and express more α-SMA compared with isolated fibroblast or mast cell populations.107,108 In addition to profibrotic growth factors such as TGF-β1, the abundant mast cell protease tryptase also possesses important profibrotic properties. Like TGF-β1, tryptase is a potent fibroblast mitogen that can signal the phenotypic transformation of the myofibroblast phenotype and is an upregulator of matrix molecule synthesis.107,109 Mast cell tryptase has been to shown to mediate fibroproliferative responses in fibroblasts via proteolytic activation of the cell surface receptor, protease-activated receptor 2.109 In addition to the liberation of pro-fibrotic mediators into the extracellular environment, direct cell-to-cell communication between mast cells and fibroblasts has been documented via communicative gap junctions, thus providing another mechanism by which these cell types can regulate each other.101,110,111 Figure 1 illustrates the dynamic interactions between mast cell and fibroblast mediators of inflammation and fibrosis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mast cells mediated inflammation and fibrosis. Mast cells circulate as CD34-positive precursor cells and terminally differentiate in connective tissues. Both IgE dependent and independent mechanisms can activate mast cells causing the release of preformed and newly synthesized pro-inflammatory mediators. Many of these mediators increase vascular permeability and promote the recruitment of other inflammatory cells and additional mast cell precursors. SCF is also secreted by activated fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, further potentiating mast cell recruitment and proliferation. TGF-β is a potent fibroblast mitogen and stimulator of myofibroblast differentiation. It also impedes myofibroblasts apoptosis. bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; CTGF, connective tissue growth factor; NGF, nerve growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; SCF, stem cell factor; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide. To see this illustration in color, the reader is referred to the web version of this article at www.liebertpub.com/wound

Given that mast cell activation and degranulation is an important physiological event in the inflammatory phase of wound healing,112 it is conceivable that in fibroproliferative conditions, persistent pro-inflammatory signals important for mast cell recruitment and activation are excessive or persist beyond normal regulatory control, establishing a mast cell-rich tissue environment. These intriguing findings have prompted recent assessment of the antifibrotic effects of mast cell inhibition in a variety of disease models. Compounds are available commercially with known inhibitory effects on mast cell degranulation: Ketotifen fumarate (Ketotifen) and sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn) are collectively known as “mast cell stabilizers” as these compounds can stabilize the mast cell membrane and impede mediator release upon stimulation.113,114 These compounds have been tested in numerous animal models of connective tissue fibrosis, with promising results.

In a rat model of autoimmune-mediated dilated cardiomyopathy, animals treated with intraperitoneal cromolyn had significant reductions in myocardial collagen hyperplasia, TGF-β1 levels, and mast cell numbers.64 Similarly, in a rat model of chemical-induced pulmonary fibrosis, Hemmati el al., demonstrated that preinjury treatment with cromolyn had protective effects against development of fibrotic changes in lung tissue characterized by decreased inflammatory cell infiltrates, negligible alveolar septal thickening, and reduced collagen mass to near control levels.63 In the tight-skin (tsk) mouse, a genetic mouse model for human scleroderma, treatment with both Ketotifen and cromolyn has been shown to equally decrease mast cell infiltrates, mast cell degranulation, and skin fibrosis compared with untreated animals.115

The red Duroc pig is a breed of pig known to heal full thickness dorsal skin wounds with abnormally fibrotic, hypercontractile scars, characterized by collagen, myofibroblast, and mast cell hyperplasia.61,65 Harunari et al. has documented a 2.4×increase in the number of mast cells in red Duroc skin wounds compared with normal samples of red Duroc skin.61 The oral administration of Ketotifen after dorsal skin wound induction using this animal model significantly reduced myofibroblast and mast cell hyperplasia and collagen deposition within scar tissue compared with placebo-treated red Duroc pig scar.65 Interestingly, Ketotifen treatment of Yorkshire pigs, a breed that heals skin wounds with a normal phenotype, did not affect wound healing. Importantly, this observation implies Ketotifen treatment ameliorates abnormal healing pathways but does not adversely affect normal healing.

Post-traumatic joint contractures are another thoroughly investigated model of injury-associated connective tissue fibrosis. The human elbow is a prototypical joint affected by post-traumatic motion loss; in affected patients the connective tissue lining of the joint (joint capsule) is irreversibly modified by fibrogenic connective tissue changes and mast cell hyperplasia.7,77,116 Using a validated rabbit model of post-traumatic joint contractures,117–119 twice daily subcutaneous administration of Ketotifen given immediately post-injury resulted in significant biomechanical and cellular reductions of joint capsule fibrosis: the biomechanical severity of joint contractures were reduced 50% and joint capsule mast cell and myofibroblast numbers were reduced by up to 70%.120 An interesting observation in this study was that not only did mast cell inhibition reduce joint contracture severity and myofibroblast hyperplasia, but also significantly reduced mast cell hyperplasia. These data suggest that activated mast cells may further potentiate joint capsule inflammation and fibrosis by the recruitment of additional mast cells. Growth factors synthesized by the mast cell, such as bFGF, PDGF, TFG-β1, and nerve growth factor (NGF) are known to promote mast cell chemotaxis and proliferation84,121 and it may be no coincidence that many of these factors are potent fibrogenic mediators as well. In addition to reductions in contracture severity and myofibroblast numbers, Ketotifen treatment in the aforementioned rabbit model also reduced TGF-β1, collagen type I and α-SMA protein, and gene expression within the affected joint capsule compared with untreated animals.122

Neuroinflammatory pathways and fibrogenesis

The scientific evidence in human and animal models linking mast cell activation to the pathogenesis of connective tissue fibrosis is compelling; however, the mechanisms responsible for persistent mast cell activation and tissue infiltration remain poorly defined. Neuropeptides such as SP and CGRP are a family of extracellular signaling molecules, which play a fundamental role in connective tissue healing responses. Collectively, these peptides function as neurotransmitters and paracrine factors promoting local vasodilation, tissue edema, cellular proliferation, matrix production, and growth factor synthesis and are important neurotransmitters involved in nociceptive signaling.123–125 SP and CGRP are synthesized in the dorsal root ganglia and released by peripheral free nerve endings within tissues such as the skin, muscle, tendons, ligaments, and joint tissue in response to noxious stimuli such as traumatic injury and growth factors such as NGF.124,125 Afferent sensory nerves expressing SP are commonly found in close proximity to the microvasculature126 and mast cells.93 SP is also a well-known mast cell secretagogue.93 Additionally, SP has been shown to stimulate fibroblast proliferation and impair pro-apoptotic signaling in myofibroblasts.127

Traumatic injury to bone and surrounding soft tissues has been shown to induce local and systemic increases in SP and CGRP.128,129 Elevated tissue and plasma levels of SP have been implicated in a variety of fibrotic conditions including Dupuytren's contracture of the hand,130 hypertrophic wound healing,65,131 keloid scarring,132 scleroderma,133 and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.134 In hypertrophic wound healing models, mechanical wound forces are thought to play an important role in abnormal scar formation and fibrogenesis. In a complex interaction of adhesion molecules, the ECM and cellular mechanoreceptors, mechanical forces can be sensed resulting in cellular proliferation and pro-fibrotic signaling.135 It has been shown that mechanical stimuli are sensed by terminal connective tissue nociceptors, which in return increases neuropeptide synthesis and transport to cutaneous free nerve endings and local synthesis by resident skin cells.136

In the red Duroc pig model of hypertrophic wound healing, elevated numbers of SP containing nerve fibers within wound specimens were observed during all time points of wound healing compared to control pigs, and in pigs treated with Ketotifen, SP levels within skin wounds were significantly reduced compared untreated pigs.65 This evidence suggests that independent of mechanical forces, tissue neuropeptide accumulations can be lessened by impeding mast cell contributions. In post-traumatic joint contractures, immunostaining for SP containing nerve fibers is also markedly increased in fibrotic joint capsule tissue77 and similar to the red Duroc pig, Ketotifen therapy reduces SP expression in affected joint capsules (Monument, Hart and Hildebrand; 2009 unpublished observations). Figure 2 illustrates myofibroblast, mast cell, and SP immunoreactivity in joint capsule preparations from the knee in New Zealand white rabbits without a contracture, with a post-traumatic contracture and in rabbits treated with Ketotifen after joint injury.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Photomicrographs of joint capsule tissue harvested from the posterior knee joint of New Zealand white rabbits with a post-traumatic joint contracture (A–D) and in rabbits treated with Ketotifen after joint injury (E–H). (I–L) A negative control (omission of primary antibodies) from a contracted joint capsule specimen. Nuclear DAPI staining illustrates cell densities in all three conditions (A, E, and I, respectively). Contracted joint capsules demonstrate high α-SMA, tryptase, and SP immunoreactivity indicative of myofibroblast, mast cell, and SP hyperplasia (white arrows, B, C, and D, respectively). In Ketotifen-treated animals, immunostaining for α-SMA, tryptase, and SP is markedly reduced. Endothelial staining is illustrated by the white block arrows (D and F). Immunoreactivity of α-SMA, tryptase, and SP is particularly enriched around microvascular elements, which is attributable to α-SMA expressed in pericytes and smooth muscle cells159 and the normal close anatomic relationship of mast cells (tryptase) and SP-expressing nerve fibers to the microvasculature. The images for each condition are of the same histological area viewed under different light sources and filters (original magnification 200×). α-SMA, alpha-smooth muscle actin; SP, substance P. To see this illustration in color, the reader is referred to the web version of this article at www.liebertpub.com/wound

Integrating this information, a working model of mast cell-mediated, neuroinflammatory post-traumatic joint capsule fibrosis has been proposed (Fig. 3): joint capsule mast cells and fibroblasts become acutely exposed to activating signals and growth factors via the fracture-induced hemarthrosis. Neuropeptides are released as part of the neurogenic response to skeletal injury. Under normal physiologic regulation, as bone and soft tissue healing progress fibroblast, myofibroblast, and mast cell numbers diminish as inflammatory and profibrotic stimuli lessen or anti-inflammatory regulatory mechanisms become engaged. However, in populations of “at-risk” patients, these fibroproliferative stimuli persist and escape regulatory control. Persistent noxious and/or chemical stimuli drive persistent neuropeptide synthesis, providing chronic activation of fibroblasts and mast cells. These upstream events facilitate an environment of sustained myofibroblast hyperplasia resulting in shortening of the ECM and disorganized collagen deposition. As mast cells and fibroblasts become activated, a positive feedback loop is engaged whereby growth factors synthesized and liberated by these cell types function to perpetuate further cell recruitment, proliferation, differentiation, and neuropeptide synthesis. Thus, these cells may form an “axis” consisting of neuropeptides, mast cells, and myofibroblasts. Based on studies of Ketotifen treatment in the rabbit post-traumatic joint contracture model and the red Duroc pig wound healing model, disruption of mast cell contributions to the fibrotic process leads to decreases in SP-containing nerves and reduced mast cell and myofibroblast numbers. Thus, this proposed axis of fibrosis is not likely linear or unidirectional, but rather regulated by multidirectional influences.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Neuropeptide–mast cell–myofibroblast contributions to post-traumatic elbow fibrosis. Traumatic injury to the elbow initiates connective tissue repair processes mediated by mast cell signaling and myofibroblast differentiation. In at-risk patients, this pathway escapes normal regulatory control; excessive SP secretion from terminal nerve endings in the joint and periarticular connective tissue results in persistent mast cell stimulation, propagating the inflammatory cascade of myofibroblast-mediated connective tissue fibrosis. Over time, excessive collagen deposition results in permanent motion loss and joint dysfunction. Modified with permission from Monument et al.160 ECM, extracellular matrix. Adapted from figures 1 and 4 in Michael James Monument, David Hart, Andrew Dean Befus, Paul Salo, and Kevin Hildebrand, Posttraumatic elbow contractures: Targeting neuro-inflammatory fibrogenic mechanisms Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2013; 18(6): 869-877. Reprinted by permission. To see this illustration in color, the reader is referred to the web version of this article at www.liebertpub.com/wound

Clinical application of mast cell inhibition: Ketotifen fumarate and sodium cromoglycate

Ketotifen fumarate and sodium cromoglycate are known as “mast cell stabilizers” as both agents prevent vesicle degranulation via interruption of normal intracellular calcium signaling required for degranulation after mast cell activation.113,114 Numerous subtle differences between these “mast cell stabilizers” warrant consideration. First, the mechanisms by which these medications blunt the acute rise in intracellular calcium needed for mast cell degranulation differs slightly. Sodium cromoglycate is thought to alter intracellular calcium levels by the inhibition of transmembrane chloride channels, while Ketotifen inhibits intracellular calcium influx by stabilizing cAMP levels.137–139 Ketotifen is a non-selective H1 receptor antagonist and therefore is considered an antiallergic compound and an antihistamine. Ketotifen also exhibits antiphosphodiesterase activity, thereby impeding the synthesis of prostaglandins and leukotrienes.140,141 Another important distinction between Ketotifen and cromolyn is that the bioavailability of orally administered Ketotifen is ∼50%,138 whereas the oral bioavailability of cromolyn is less than 1%.142 Because of this, oral Ketotifen has been extensively studied and is an U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medication for patients with mild to moderate asthma. A recent Cochrane review of this literature supports the efficacy of Ketotifen used alone or as an adjunct in this patient population.143 Because Ketotifen is a non-selective H1 receptor antagonist, systemic antihistamine side effects such as somnolence, dry mouth, and weight gain have been reported in clinical trials. However, to circumvent these systemic issues with Ketotifen and cromolyn's negligible oral bioavailability, transdermal delivery techniques for both of these agents are under development.144–146 Transdermal delivery of these mast cell stabilizing agents could be an especially advantageous strategy to prevent hand and finger contractures after injury or to prevent hypertrophic wound healing after burns, lacerations, and surgical incisions.

To date, only one clinical study has evaluated the preventative effects of oral Ketotifen in a human disease model of fibrosis. Gruber and Kaufman147 performed a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing oral Ketotifen (3 mg twice daily) to placebo in patients with established scleroderma. Apart from relief of pruritis, the administration of Ketotifen did not improve any clinical parameters such as pulmonary function, overall skin scores, and maximal oral aperture. These discouraging results halted the momentum of mast cell inhibition as a treatment strategy for connective tissue fibrosis. Despite these results, Ketotifen has since been tested in various animal models of fibrosis with extremely promising results. A major critique of the results observed in the Gruber and Kaufman study pertain to the timing of drug administration: all patients enrolled in this study had pre-existing clinical manifestations of fibrosis, with>90% of patients in both study arms having abnormal pulmonary function tests prior to commencing Ketotifen treatment. The distribution and tissue penetration of systemic Ketotifen has not been well characterized and it also possible that Ketotifen was not adequately distributed into the connective tissue of scleroderma patients. This is supported by the observation in the Gruber and Kaufman study where dermal mast cells obtained from post-treatment punch biopsies were just as sensitive to mast cell secretagouges such as compound 48/80 compared to control mast cells.147 Further, mast cell populations throughout the body are heterogeneous and there is in vitro data suggesting that skin mast cells are not overtly sensitive to Ketotifen and cromolyn.148,149 However, data from preclinical models of hypertrophic wound healing in the red Duroc pig and post-traumatic knee contractures in the rabbit would suggest that both oral and subcutaneously administered Ketotifen ameliorates abnormal healing responses in the skin and joint capsule, respectively.

Based on preclinical data, Ketotifen and cromolyn therapy should be utilized as a preventative intervention and should not be expected to reverse existing fibrosis. This conclusion is reinforced by results from the red Duroc pig wound healing model where early administration of Ketotifen after wound induction was effective, whereas delayed administration (28 days after wound induction) did not affect wound contraction,65 supporting the argument that early interruption of neuropeptide–mast cell–myofibroblast axis may be crucial to halting the fibrogenic process. Common to all preclinical models showing a treatment effect after Ketotifen or cromolyn administration is the temporal relationship of systemic treatment shortly after the inciting, pro-fibrotic event (wound induction, joint injury, lung injury, etc.). This emphasizes the importance of identifying those at risk for excessive fibroproliferative responses, as pharmacological interventions targeting mast cell signaling will be more effective in preventing fibrosis than treating established disease.

Who is at risk?

Clinically, abnormal fibrogenic healing responses are not ubiquitous to all patients and clearly, the determinants of risk in these patients are not well established. In animal studies, many of the molecular upregulators and manifestations of tissue fibrogenesis are elevated soon after injury or wound induction.33,46,61,77,119 Additionally, in the red Duroc pig model, the antifibrotic effects of Ketotifen were dependent on the timing of drug administration after wound induction.65 Consequently, if attempts are made to break the maladaptive axis of neuropeptide–mast cell–myofibroblast regulated fibrogenesis, treatment and prevention strategies should be implemented soon after injury or surgical intervention, highlighting the importance of identifying those at risk.

We have postulated that a neuropeptide–mast cell–myofibroblast axis is vital to the fibrogenic process and the identification of an easily assayed biomarker specific and sensitive to the excessive signaling of this pathway may be highly informative (Table 1). Histamine levels in conditions with suspected mast cell involvement have been examined, such as asthma and physical urticarias demonstrating significant elevations of plasma histamine within affected patients.150,151 However, the measurement of plasma histamine as a marker of mast cell activity is complicated by the fact that other circulating cell populations such as platelets84 and basophils152 are also sources of histamine. Further, enzymatic metabolism of plasma histamine is rapid with a half-life of ∼90–100 seconds and basal plasma concentrations are usually less than 0.4 ng/mL.153 Alternatively, a method of measuring the plasma concentrations of a primary histamine metabolite, N-tau-methylhistamine, which is more stable than the parent histamine peptide, has been developed.154 Using this technique, plasma concentrations of N-tau-methylhistamine in patients suffering from hypertrophic scar formation after significant full-thickness burn injuries were double those of control patients.154

Table 1.

Quantifiable circulatory biomarkers of connective tissue fibrosis

Biomarker Source Half Life Specificity Comments
Histamine Plasma Short (90–100 s) Mast cells, Basophils, foreign pathogens Short half life, low specificity
N-Methylhistamine Plasma, urine Long (50–60 min) Mast cells and Basophils Longer half life, greater specificity, urine levels dependent on renal function
Tryptase Serum, plasma Long (1–2 h) Mast cells Specific to mast cells, not affected by blood clotting
Substance P Plasma, synovial fluid Short (1–2 min) Free nerve endings Low specificity, elevated in various MSK conditions

MSK, musculoskeletal.

Unlike histamine, tryptase is specific to mast cells, is much more stable with a half-life of 2 h and concentrations are not affected by blood clotting.76 Therefore, tryptase can be assessed from serum or plasma. Elevated serum and plasma tryptase levels are common in patients suffering from acute anaphylactic reactions and in those with mast cell proliferative disorders such as mastocytosis or mast cell leukemia.155 Baseline tryptase levels are also elevated in patients predisposed to anaphylactic reactions.155 Measurement of circulating SP levels is another consideration. Assays are available to measure SP levels in human plasma and synovial fluid.156,157

Whether detectable differences in the concentrations of histamine, tryptase, SP, or other potential fibrogenic biomarkers can be measured in patients at risk for hypertrophic wound healing, post-traumatic joint contractures, or other fibroproliferative conditions has yet to be determined. Moreover, the profibrotic phenotype may be identified by a constellation of elevated biomarkers rather than a single aberrant measure of an upregulated neuropeptide–mast cell–myofibroblast axis. Further complicating this matter is that activated mast cells are also capable of selective mediator release without degranulating preformed granules and classic mast cell mediators.158 This stresses the importance of further delineating the precise mast cell mediators involved in fibrogenic healing responses as we search for predictive biomarkers.

Summary

Aberrant connective tissue fibrosis is common to numerous medical and surgical conditions across a broad range of clinical subspecialties and the difficulty in treating these conditions stems from our limited understanding of this important physiological process. These difficulties are further compounded by the lack of therapeutic and preventative measures available for treating affected patients. Recent advances in the development of surrogate animal models of common human fibroproliferative conditions has shed significant light on the pathogenesis of connective tissue fibrosis. Excessive signaling between mast cells, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts with potential neurogenic modulation of this pathway is supported by various studies and provides encouraging optimism that multiple avenues of augmentation to this pathway may exist. Further characterization of this neuroinflammatory pathway, the receptors involved and the identification of those at risk for progressive and maladaptive fibrosis will be fundamental to the development of effective treatment and preventative strategies.

TAKE HOME MESSAGES.

  • • Connective tissue fibrosis is characterized by myofibroblast proliferations and disorganized collagen hyperplasia.

  • • Preclinical models of numerous fibroproliferative disorders have enabled the identification of key fibrogenic molecular pathways.

  • • Mast cell and neuropeptide signaling are dysregulated during the acute phases of fibrogenesis.

  • • FDA approved medications are available to regulate mast cell activity, which have demonstrated promising antifibrotic effects in preclinical models of fibrosis.

  • • Successful, systemic antifibrotic therapies require early intervention and the identification of “at risk” populations.

Acknowledgments and Funding Sources

The authors thank Mei Zhang and Carol Reno for excellent technical assistance in the performance of many of the studies carried out in the authors' laboratories. In addition, the authors also thank the graduate students and other colleagues who have contributed to our understanding of the wound healing field. The authors are supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR), the Orthopaedic Research and Education Fund (OREF), the Canadian Orthopaedic Foundation, the Calgary Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation (COREF), the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) and Alberta Innovates–Health Solutions (AIHS).

Author Disclosure and Ghostwriting

No competing financial interests exist. The content of this article was expressly written by the authors listed. No ghostwriters were used to write this article.

About the Authors

Michael J. Monument is a clinical sarcoma fellow at the Huntsman Cancer Institute and Primary Children's Medical Center affiliated with the University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Research interests include mast cell contributions to fibrosis, transcriptional regulation in Ewing sarcoma, mesenchymal stem cells, and metastatic bone disease. David A. Hart is a Professor of Surgery, Medicine, and Microbiology, Immunology & Infectious Diseases at the University of Calgary. His research interests are acute and chronic wound healing, the molecular and cell biology of wound healing, and fibrotic responses to tissue injury. Paul T. Salo is a professor in the Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Calgary and a Senior Scholar of Alberta Innovates–Health Solutions. Research interests include neurovascular interactions in wound healing and joint injury. A. Dean Befus is a Professor of Medicine and the Astra-Zeneca Canada Inc., Chair in Asthma Research with the Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Department of Medicine at the University of Alberta. Research interests focus on three primary aspects of lung disease, including mast cells in allergic and other inflammatory conditions, neuro-endocrine-immunologic network in inflammation and implementation and evaluation of education programs for adults and children with asthma. Kevin A. Hildebrand is a Professor in the Department of Surgery and the Chair of the Section of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services–Calgary Zone. Research interests include post-traumatic joint contractures, and hip fracture treatment and care pathway development/implementation

Abbreviations and Acronyms

bFGF

basic fibroblast growth factor

C3a

complement component 3a

cAMP

cyclic adenosine monophosphate

CGRP

calcitonin gene-related peptide

c-kit

cellular homolog of the feline sarcoma viral oncogene v-kit

CTGF

connective tissue growth factor

DAPI

4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

ECM

extracellular matrix

FcɛRI

Fc fragment of IgE, high affinity receptor 1

FDA

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

GI

gastrointestinal

IFN-α

interferon alpha

IFN-γ

interferon gamma

IgE

immunoglobulin E

IL

interleukin

MCT

tryptase- and chymase-positive mast cells

MCTC

tryptase positive and chymase-negative mast cells

MMP

matrix metalloproteinase

NGF

nerve growth factor

PAF

platelet activating factor

PDGF

platelet-derived growth factor

SCF

stem cell factor

SP

substance P

TGF-β

transforming growth factor-beta

TIMP

tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor-alpha

α-SMA

alpha-smooth muscle actin

References

  • 1.Diegelmann RF. and Evans MC: Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci 2004; 9:283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reinke JM. and Sorg H: Wound repair and regeneration. Eur Surg Res 2012; 49:35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, and Brown RA: Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gabbiani G: The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J Pathol 2003; 200:500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smith SP, Devaraj VS, and Bunker TD: The association between frozen shoulder and Dupuytren's disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10:149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heard BE, Dewar A, and Corrin B: Apposition of fibroblasts to mast cells and lymphocytes in normal human lung and in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. Ultrastructure and cell perimeter measurements. J Pathol 1992; 166:303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hildebrand KA, Zhang M, van Snellenberg W, King GJ, and Hart DA: Myofibroblast numbers are elevated in human elbow capsules after trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (419):189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hildebrand KA, Zhang M, and Hart DA: High rate of joint capsule matrix turnover in chronic human elbow contractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 439:228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jeong WI, Lee CS, Park SJ, Chung JY, and Jeong KS: Kinetics of macrophages, myofibroblasts and mast cells in carbon tetrachloride-induced rat liver cirrhosis. Anticancer Res 2002; 22:869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Toth T, Toth-Jakatics R, Jimi S, Ihara M, Urata H, and Takebayashi S: Mast cells in rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10:1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nedelec B, Shankowsky H, Scott PG, Ghahary A, and Tredget EE: Myofibroblasts and apoptosis in human hypertrophic scars: the effect of interferon-alpha2b. Surgery 2001; 130:798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yamaguchi R, Takami Y, Yamaguchi Y, and Shimazaki S: Bone marrow-derived myofibroblasts recruited to the upper dermis appear beneath regenerating epidermis after deep dermal burn injury. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15:87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vaughan MB, Howard EW, and Tomasek JJ: Transforming growth factor-beta1 promotes the morphological and functional differentiation of the myofibroblast. Exp Cell Res 2000; 257:180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Phan SH: Biology of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5:334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Novo E, Marra F, Zamara E, et al. : Overexpression of Bcl-2 by activated human hepatic stellate cells: resistance to apoptosis as a mechanism of progressive hepatic fibrogenesis in humans. Gut 2006; 55:1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abe R, Donnelly SC, Peng T, Bucala R, and Metz CN: Peripheral blood fibrocytes: differentiation pathway and migration to wound sites. J Immunol 2001; 166:7556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Radisky DC, Kenny PA, and Bissell MJ: Fibrosis and cancer: do myofibroblasts come also from epithelial cells via EMT? J Cell Biochem 2007; 101:830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kissin E. and Korn JH: Apoptosis and myofibroblasts in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2002; 4:129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Powell DW, Mifflin RC, Valentich JD, Crowe SE, Saada JI, and West AB: Myofibroblasts. I. Paracrine cells important in health and disease. Am J Physiol 1999; 277(1 Pt 1):C1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Darby I, Skalli O, and Gabbiani G: Alpha-smooth muscle actin is transiently expressed by myofibroblasts during experimental wound healing. Lab Invest 1990; 63:21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wynn TA: Common and unique mechanisms regulate fibrosis in various fibroproliferative diseases. J Clin Invest 2007; 117:524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mu X, Bellayr I, Walters T, and Li Y: Mediators leading to fibrosis—how to measure and control them in tissue engineering. Oper Tech Orthop 2010; 20:110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Raghunath M, Unsold C, Kubitscheck U, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Peters R, and Meuli M: The cutaneous microfibrillar apparatus contains latent transforming growth factor-beta binding protein-1 (LTBP-1) and is a repository for latent TGF-beta1. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111:559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Desmouliere A, Geinoz A, Gabbiani F, and Gabbiani G: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1993; 122:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang HY. and Phan SH: Inhibition of myofibroblast apoptosis by transforming growth factor beta(1). Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1999; 21:658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arora PD. and McCulloch CA: The deletion of transforming growth factor-beta-induced myofibroblasts depends on growth conditions and actin organization. Am J Pathol 1999; 155:2087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jelaska A. and Korn JH: Role of apoptosis and transforming growth factor beta1 in fibroblast selection and activation in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:2230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hildebrand KA, Zhang M, and Hart DA: Myofibroblast upregulators are elevated in joint capsules in posttraumatic contractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 456:85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang JF, Jiao H, Stewart TL, Shankowsky HA, Scott PG, and Tredget EE: Fibrocytes from burn patients regulate the activities of fibroblasts. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15:113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ramos C, Montano M, Garcia-Alvarez J, et al. : Fibroblasts from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and normal lungs differ in growth rate, apoptosis, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases expression. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001; 24:591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee TY, Chin GS, Kim WJ, Chau D, Gittes GK, and Longaker MT: Expression of transforming growth factor beta 1, 2, and 3 proteins in keloids. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 43:179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Martin M, Lefaix J, and Delanian S: TGF-beta1 and radiation fibrosis: a master switch and a specific therapeutic target? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47:277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Coimbra TM, Carvalho J, Fattori A, Da Silva CG, and Lachat JJ: Transforming growth factor-beta production during the development of renal fibrosis in rats with subtotal renal ablation. Int J Exp Pathol 1996; 77:167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Santana A, Saxena B, Noble NA, Gold LI, and Marshall BC: Increased expression of transforming growth factor beta isoforms (beta 1, beta 2, beta 3) in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1995; 13:34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang K, Garner W, Cohen L, Rodriguez J, and Phan S: Increased types I and III collagen and transforming growth factor-beta 1 mRNA and protein in hypertrophic burn scar. J Invest Dermatol 1995; 104:750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tredget EE, Wang R, Shen Q, Scott PG, and Ghahary A: Transforming growth factor-beta mRNA and protein in hypertrophic scar tissues and fibroblasts: antagonism by IFN-alpha and IF N-gamma in vitro and in vivo. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2000; 20:143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schmid P, Itin P, Cherry G, Bi C, and Cox DA: Enhanced expression of transforming growth factor-beta type I and type II receptors in wound granulation tissue and hypertrophic scar. Am J Pathol 1998; 152:485. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rosenkranz S: TGF-beta1 and angiotensin networking in cardiac remodeling. Cardiovasc Res 2004; 63:423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lan HY: Diverse roles of TGF-beta/Smads in renal fibrosis and inflammation. Int J Biol Sci 2011; 7:1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lu L, Saulis AS, Liu WR, et al. : The temporal effects of anti-TGF-beta1, 2, and 3 monoclonal antibody on wound healing and hypertrophic scar formation. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shah M, Foreman DM, and Ferguson MW: Neutralisation of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 or exogenous addition of TGF-beta 3 to cutaneous rat wounds reduces scarring. J Cell Sci 1995; 108 (Pt 3):985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Singer AJ, Huang SS, Huang JS, et al. : A novel TGF-beta antagonist speeds reepithelialization and reduces scarring of partial thickness porcine burns. J Burn Care Res 2009; 30:329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yamamoto T, Takagawa S, Katayama I, and Nishioka K: Anti-sclerotic effect of transforming growth factor-beta antibody in a mouse model of bleomycin-induced scleroderma. Clin Immunol 1999; 92:6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kuwahara F, Kai H, Tokuda K, et al. : Transforming growth factor-beta function blocking prevents myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in pressure-overloaded rats. Circulation 2002; 106:130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sharma K, Jin Y, Guo J, and Ziyadeh FN: Neutralization of TGF-beta by anti-TGF-beta antibody attenuates kidney hypertrophy and the enhanced extracellular matrix gene expression in STZ-induced diabetic mice. Diabetes 1996; 45:522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Giri SN, Hyde DM, and Hollinger MA: Effect of antibody to transforming growth factor beta on bleomycin induced accumulation of lung collagen in mice. Thorax 1993; 48:959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Grehn F, Hollo G, Khaw P, et al. : Factors affecting the outcome of trabeculectomy: an analysis based on combined data from two phase III studies of an antibody to transforming growth factor beta2, CAT-152. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Denton CP, Merkel PA, Furst DE, et al. : Recombinant human anti-transforming growth factor beta1 antibody therapy in systemic sclerosis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trial of CAT-192. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56:323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Werner S. and Grose R: Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 2003; 83:835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rosier RN, O'Keefe RJ, and Hicks DG: The potential role of transforming growth factor beta in fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (355 Suppl):S294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Feng XH. and Derynck R: Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005; 21:659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Weber L, Meigel WN, and Spier W: Collagen polymorphism in pathologic human scars. Arch Dermatol Res 1978; 261:63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dunn MG, Silver FH, and Swann DA: Mechanical analysis of hypertrophic scar tissue: structural basis for apparent increased rigidity. J Invest Dermatol 1985; 84:9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hildebrand KA, Zhang M, and Hart DA: Joint capsule matrix turnover in a rabbit model of chronic joint contractures: correlation with human contractures. J Orthop Res 2006; 24:1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Murrell GA, Francis MJ, and Bromley L: The collagen changes of Dupuytren's contracture. J Hand Surg [Br] 1991; 16:263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sondergaard K, Heickendorff L, Risteli L, et al. : Increased levels of type I and III collagen and hyaluronan in scleroderma skin. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136:47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Toubi E, Kessel A, Grushko G, Sabo E, Rozenbaum M, and Rosner I: The association of serum matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitor levels with scleroderma disease severity. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2002; 20:221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Johnston P, Chojnowski AJ, Davidson RK, Riley GP, Donell ST, and Clark IM: A complete expression profile of matrix-degrading metalloproteinases in Dupuytren's disease. J Hand Surg [Am] 2007; 32:343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gonzalez-Avila G, Iturria C, Vadillo-Ortega F, Ovalle C, and Montano M: Changes in matrix metalloproteinases during the evolution of interstitial renal fibrosis in a rat experimental model. Pathobiology 1998; 66:196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mascarenhas J, Pardanani A, Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R.Chapter 71—Mast Cells and Systemic Mastocytosis. In: Hoffman R, ed. Hematology: Basic Principals and Practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2012; 1095 [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harunari N, Zhu KQ, Armendariz RT, et al. : Histology of the thick scar on the female, red Duroc pig: final similarities to human hypertrophic scar. Burns 2006; 32:669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tredget EE, Shankowsky HA, Pannu R, et al. : Transforming growth factor-beta in thermally injured patients with hypertrophic scars: effects of interferon alpha-2b. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102:1317.; discussion 1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hemmati AA, Nazari Z, Motlagh ME, and Goldasteh S: The role of sodium cromolyn in treatment of paraquat-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rat. Pharmacol Res 2002; 46:229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Palaniyandi Selvaraj S, Watanabe K, Ma M, Tachikawa H, Kodama M, and Aizawa Y: Involvement of mast cells in the development of fibrosis in rats with postmyocarditis dilated cardiomyopathy. Biol Pharm Bull 2005; 28:2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gallant-Behm CL, Hildebrand KA, and Hart DA: The mast cell stabilizer ketotifen prevents development of excessive skin wound contraction and fibrosis in red Duroc pigs. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16:226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gruber BL. and Kaufman LD: Ketotifen-induced remission in progressive early diffuse scleroderma: evidence for the role of mast cells in disease pathogenesis. Am J Med 1990; 89:392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Denburg JA: Basophil and mast cell lineages in vitro and in vivo. Blood 1992; 79:846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dvorak AM, Mihm MC, Jr., and Dvorak HF: Degranulation of basophilic leukocytes in allergic contact dermatitis reactions in man. J Immunol 1976; 116:687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Osborn L: Leukocyte adhesion to endothelium in inflammation. Cell 1990; 62:3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Klein LM, Lavker RM, Matis WL, and Murphy GF: Degranulation of human mast cells induces an endothelial antigen central to leukocyte adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:8972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dabbous MK, Woolley DE, Haney L, Carter LM, and Nicolson GL: Host-mediated effectors of tumor invasion: role of mast cells in matrix degradation. Clin Exp Metastasis 1986; 4:141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bromley M, Fisher WD, and Woolley DE: Mast cells at sites of cartilage erosion in the rheumatoid joint. Ann Rheum Dis 1984; 43:769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Banovac K, Renfree K, Makowski AL, Latta LL, and Altman RD: Fracture healing and mast cells. J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9:482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Krishnaswamy G, Ajitawi O, and Chi DS: The human mast cell: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 2006; 315:13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Eguchi M: Comparative electron microscopy of basophils and mast cells, in vivo and in vitro. Electron Microsc Rev 1991; 4:293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Miller JS. and Schwartz LB: Human mast cell proteases and mast cell heterogeneity. Curr Opin Immunol 1989; 1:637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hildebrand KA, Zhang M, and Hart DA: Joint capsule mast cells and neuropeptides are increased within four weeks of injury and remain elevated in chronic stages of posttraumatic contractures. J Orthop Res 2008; 26:1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Buckley MG, Gallagher PJ, and Walls AF: Mast cell subpopulations in the synovial tissue of patients with osteoarthritis: selective increase in numbers of tryptase-positive, chymase-negative mast cells. J Pathol. September1998; 186:67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Dowdall JF, Winter DC, Baird AW, and Bouchier-Hayes D: Biological role and clinical implications of mast cells in surgery. Surgery 2002; 132:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gruber BL: Mast cells in the pathogenesis of fibrosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2003; 5:147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Irani AM, Nilsson G, Miettinen U, et al. : Recombinant human stem cell factor stimulates differentiation of mast cells from dispersed human fetal liver cells. Blood 1992; 80:3009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chabot B, Stephenson DA, Chapman VM, Besmer P, and Bernstein A: The proto-oncogene c-kit encoding a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor maps to the mouse W locus. Nature 1988; 35:88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dayton ET, Pharr P, Ogawa M, et al. : 3T3 fibroblasts induce cloned interleukin 3-dependent mouse mast cells to resemble connective tissue mast cells in granular constituency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988; 85:569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gruber BL: Mast cells: accessory cells which potentiate fibrosis. Int Rev Immunol 1995; 12:259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kulka M, Sheen CH, Tancowny BP, Grammer LC, and Schleimer RP: Neuropeptides activate human mast cell degranulation and chemokine production. Immunology 2008; 123:398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Vartio T, Seppa H, and Vaheri A: Susceptibility of soluble and matrix fibronectins to degradation by tissue proteinases, mast cell chymase and cathepsin G. J Biol Chem 1981; 256:471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wintroub BU, Schechter NB, Lazarus GS, Kaempfer CE, and Schwartz LB: Angiotensin I conversion by human and rat chymotryptic proteinases. J Invest Dermatol 1984; 83:336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ohkawara Y, Yamauchi K, Tanno Y, et al. : Human lung mast cells and pulmonary macrophages produce tumor necrosis factor-alpha in sensitized lung tissue after IgE receptor triggering. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1992; 7:385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pennington D, Thomas P, Lopez A, and Gold W: Transforming growth factor-beta production by dog mastocytoma cells. Storage and release from mast cell granules. Chest 1991; 99(3 Suppl):66S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Blank U. and Rivera J: The ins and outs of IgE-dependent mast-cell exocytosis. Trends Immunol 2004; 25:266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sagi-Eisenberg R: The mast cell: where endocytosis and regulated exocytosis meet. Immunol Rev 2007; 217:292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Prodeus AP, Zhou X, Maurer M, Galli SJ, and Carroll MC: Impaired mast cell-dependent natural immunity in complement C3-deficient mice. Nature 1997; 390(6656):172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Foreman JC: Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide: effects on mast cells and in human skin. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1987; 82:366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Casale TB, Bowman S, and Kaliner M: Induction of human cutaneous mast cell degranulation by opiates and endogenous opioid peptides: evidence for opiate and nonopiate receptor participation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984; 73:775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Akimoto S, Ishikawa O, Iijima C, and Miyachi Y: Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor and its receptor by fibroblast, macrophages and mast cells in hypertrophic scar. Eur J Dermatol 1999; 9:357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hunt LW, Colby TV, Weiler DA, Sur S, and Butterfield JH: Immunofluorescent staining for mast cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: quantification and evidence for extracellular release of mast cell tryptase. Mayo Clin Proc 1992; 67:941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Irani AM, Gruber BL, Kaufman LD, Kahaleh MB, and Schwartz LB: Mast cell changes in scleroderma. Presence of MCT cells in the skin and evidence of mast cell activation. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35:933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kondo S, Kagami S, Kido H, Strutz F, Muller GA, and Kuroda Y: Role of mast cell tryptase in renal interstitial fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:1668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kawanami O, Ferrans VJ, Fulmer JD, and Crystal RG: Ultrastructure of pulmonary mast cells in patients with fibrotic lung disorders. Lab Invest 1979; 40:717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ozbilgin MK. and Inan S: The roles of transforming growth factor type beta3 (TGF-beta3) and mast cells in the pathogenesis of scleroderma. Clin Rheumatol 2003; 22:189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yamamoto T, Hartmann K, Eckes B, and Krieg T: Mast cells enhance contraction of three-dimensional collagen lattices by fibroblasts by cell-cell interaction: role of stem cell factor/c-kit. Immunology 2000; 99:435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Adachi S, Ebi Y, Nishikawa S, et al. : Necessity of extracellular domain of W (c-kit) receptors for attachment of murine cultured mast cells to fibroblasts. Blood 1992; 79:650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Flanagan JG. and Leder P: The kit ligand: a cell surface molecule altered in steel mutant fibroblasts. Cell 1990; 63:185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mak K, Manji A, Gallant-Behm C, et al. : Scarless healing of oral mucosa is characterized by faster resolution of inflammation and control of myofibroblast action compared to skin wounds in the red Duroc pig model. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 56:168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wulff BC, Parent AE, Meleski MA, DiPietro LA, Schrementi ME, and Wilgus TA: Mast cells contribute to scar formation during fetal wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 2012; 132:458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hugle T, Hogan V, White KE, and van Laar JM: Mast cells are a source of transforming growth factor beta in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63:795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Gailit J, Marchese MJ, Kew RR, and Gruber BL: The differentiation and function of myofibroblasts is regulated by mast cell mediators. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 117:1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Skold CM, Ohkuni Y, Liu XD, Numerof R, and Rennard SI: Co-cultured human mast cells stimulate fibroblast-mediated contraction of collagen gels. Inflammation 2001; 25:47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Akers IA, Parsons M, Hill MR, et al. : Mast cell tryptase stimulates human lung fibroblast proliferation via protease-activated receptor-2. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000; 278:L193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Au SR, Au K, Saggers GC, Karne N, and Ehrlich HP: Rat mast cells communicate with fibroblasts via gap junction intercellular communications. J Cell Biochem 2007; 100:1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Moyer KE, Saggers GC, and Ehrlich HP: Mast cells promote fibroblast populated collagen lattice contraction through gap junction intercellular communication. Wound Repair Regen 2004; 12:269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Weller K, Foitzik K, Paus R, Syska W, and Maurer M: Mast cells are required for normal healing of skin wounds in mice. FASEB J 2006; 20:2366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Craps LP. and Ney UM: Ketotifen: current views on its mechanism of action and their therapeutic implications. Respiration 1984; 45:411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Norris AA: Pharmacology of sodium cromoglycate. Clin Exp Allergy 1996; 26Suppl 4:5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Walker M, Harley R, and LeRoy EC: Ketotifen prevents skin fibrosis in the tight skin mouse. J Rheumatol 1990; 17:57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Germscheid NM. and Hildebrand KA: Regional variation is present in elbow capsules after injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 450:219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Hildebrand KA, Holmberg M, and Shrive N: A new method to measure post-traumatic joint contractures in the rabbit knee. J Biomech Eng 2003; 125:887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hildebrand KA, Sutherland C, and Zhang M: Rabbit knee model of post-traumatic joint contractures: the long-term natural history of motion loss and myofibroblasts. J Orthop Res 2004; 22:313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Abdel MP, Morrey ME, Barlow JD, et al. : Myofibroblast cells are preferentially expressed early in a rabbit model of joint contracture. J Orthop Res 2012; 30:713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Monument MJ, Hart DA, Befus AD, Salo PT, Zhang M, and Hildebrand KA: The mast cell stabilizer ketotifen fumarate lessens contracture severity and myofibroblast hyperplasia: a study of a rabbit model of posttraumatic joint contractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92:1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Marshall JS, Stead RH, McSharry C, Nielsen L, and Bienenstock J: The role of mast cell degranulation products in mast cell hyperplasia. I. Mechanism of action of nerve growth factor. J Immunol 1990; 144:1886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Monument MJ, Hart DA, Befus AD, Salo PT, Zhang M, and Hildebrand KA: The mast cell stabilizer ketotifen reduces joint capsule fibrosis in a rabbit model of post-traumatic joint contractures. Inflamm Res 2012; 61:285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hart DA, Frank CB, and Bray RC: Inflammatory processes in repetitive motion and overuse syndromes: potential role of neurogenic mechanisms in tendons and ligaments. In:. Repetitive Motion Disorders of the Upper Extremity, edited by Gordon S. L., Blair S. J. and Fine L. J. Rosemount, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 1995, pp. 247–262 [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Schaffer M, Beiter T, Becker HD, and Hunt TK: Neuropeptides: mediators of inflammation and tissue repair? Arch Surg 1998; 133:1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ackermann PW, Salo PT, and Hart DA: Neuronal pathways in tendon healing. Front Biosci 2009; 14:5165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Pernow B: Substance P. Pharmacol Rev 1983; 35:85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Jing C, Jia-Han W, and Hong-Xing Z: Double-edged effects of neuropeptide substance P on repair of cutaneous trauma. Wound Repair Regen 2010; 18:319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Rusanen M, Korkala O, Gronblad M, Partanen S, and Nederstrom A: Evolution of substance P immunofluorescent nerves in callus tissue during fracture healing. J Trauma 1987; 27:1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Sio SW, Puthia MK, Lu J, Moochhala S, and Bhatia M: The neuropeptide substance P is a critical mediator of burn-induced acute lung injury. J Immunol 2008; 180:8333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Schubert TE, Weidler C, Borisch N, Schubert C, Hofstadter F, and Straub RH: Dupuytren's contracture is associated with sprouting of substance P positive nerve fibres and infiltration by mast cells. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65:414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Scott JR, Muangman PR, Tamura RN, et al. : Substance P levels and neutral endopeptidase activity in acute burn wounds and hypertrophic scar. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115:1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ogawa R: Keloid and hypertrophic scarring may result from a mechanoreceptor or mechanosensitive nociceptor disorder. Med Hypotheses 2008; 71:493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Haustein UF, Weber B, and Seikowski K: [Substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide in patients with progressive scleroderma. Determination of plasma level before and after autogenic training]. Hautarzt 1995; 46:102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Takeyama M, Nagai S, Mori K, Ikawa K, Satake N, and Izumi T: Substance P-like immunoreactive substance in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 1996; 13:33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Ogawa R: Mechanobiology of scarring. Wound Repair Regen 2011; 19Suppl 1:s2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Chin MS, Lancerotto L, Helm DL, et al. : Analysis of neuropeptides in stretched skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124:102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Arruzazabala ML, Gonzalez Alvarez R, and Sarracent Perez J: Involvement of calcium ions in the mode of action of disodium cromoglycate and ketotifen on smooth muscle. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1983; 11:15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Grant SM, Goa KL, Fitton A, and Sorkin EM: Ketotifen. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in asthma and allergic disorders. Drugs 1990; 40:412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Hui KK. and Yu JL: Ketotifen increases cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate in intact human lymphocyte and potentiates other adenylate cyclase activating agents. Life Sci 1987; 40:1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.MacDonald GF: An overview of ketotifen. Chest 1982; 82(1 Suppl):30S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Greenwood C: The pharmacology of ketotifen. Chest 1982; 82(1 Suppl):45S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Storms W. and Kaliner MA: Cromolyn sodium: fitting an old friend into current asthma treatment. J Asthma 2005; 42:79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Schwarzer G, Bassler D, Mitra A, Ducharme FM, and Forster J: Ketotifen alone or as additional medication for long-term control of asthma and wheeze in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004: CD001384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Rakesh R. and Anoop KR: Formulation and optimization of nano-sized ethosomes for enhanced transdermal delivery of cromolyn sodium. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012; 4:333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kitagawa S. and Ikarashi A: Enhanced skin permeation of cationic drug ketotifen through excised guinea pig dorsal skin by surfactants with different electric charges. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2003; 51:1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Edwards AM, Stevens MT, and Church MK: The effects of topical sodium cromoglicate on itch and flare in human skin induced by intradermal histamine: a randomised double-blind vehicle controlled intra-subject design trial. BMC Res Notes 2011; 4:47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Gruber BL. and Kaufman LD: A double-blind randomized controlled trial of ketotifen versus placebo in early diffuse scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34:362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Okayama Y, Benyon RC, Rees PH, Lowman MA, Hillier K, and Church MK: Inhibition profiles of sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium on mediator release from mast cells of human skin, lung, tonsil, adenoid and intestine. Clin Exp Allergy 1992; 22:401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Okayama Y. and Church MK: Comparison of the modulatory effect of ketotifen, sodium cromoglycate, procaterol and salbutamol in human skin, lung and tonsil mast cells. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1992; 97:216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Huston DP, Bressler RB, Kaliner M, Sowell LK, and Baylor MW: Prevention of mast-cell degranulation by ketotifen in patients with physical urticarias. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104:507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Chyrek-Borowska S, Hofman J, and Siergiejko Z: Effect of Ketotifen on the blood histamine level in atopic patients and on histamine release from mouse mast cells exposed to specific antigen and C. 48/80. In Proceedings, Annual Meeting of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology1981; 2:811 [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Gushchin IS, Serov AA, Zebrev AI, Sapozhnihov AM, and Khristenko AV: Ketotifen effect on secretion of histamine from basophils and on proliferative response of mononuclear cells of human peripheral blood. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1985; 13:111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Maslinski C: Histamine and its metabolism in mammals. Part II: Catabolism of histamine and histamine liberation. Agents Actions 1975; 5:183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Tredget EE, Iwashina T, Scott PG, and Ghahary A: Determination of plasma Ntau-methylhistamine in vivo by isotope dilution using benchtop gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1997; 694:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Schwartz LB: Diagnostic value of tryptase in anaphylaxis and mastocytosis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2006; 26:451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Zhang B, Muneta T, Yagishita K, and Sekiya I: Substance P immunoreactive fibers of synovial tissue in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14:404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Marshall KW, Chiu B, and Inman RD: Substance P and arthritis: analysis of plasma and synovial fluid levels. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33:87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Theoharides TC, Kempuraj D, Tagen M, Conti P, and Kalogeromitros D: Differential release of mast cell mediators and the pathogenesis of inflammation. Immunol Rev 2007; 217:65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Serini G. and Gabbiani G: Mechanisms of myofibroblast activity and phenotypic modulation. Exp Cell Res 1999; 250:273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Monument MJ, Hart DA, Salo PT, Befus AD, and Hildebrand KA: Posttraumatic elbow contractures: targeting neuroinflammatory fibrogenic mechanisms. J Orthop Sci 2013; 18:869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Advances in Wound Care are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES