Abstract
The reaction of 1,1-bis(pinacolboronate) esters with alkyl halides can be effected by metal alkoxides and provides a strategy for the construction of organoboronate compounds. The reaction is found to occur by alkoxide-induced deborylation and generation of a boron-stabilized carbanion.
Alkylboronic esters are an important class of compounds that can be converted to a variety of useful building blocks by both catalytic and noncatalytic processes.1 Whereas strategies for constructing these compounds by olefin hydroboration2 or by addition of organometallics to borate ester derivatives3 (i.e., pinBOMe) are well developed, recently emerging methods involving borylation of organic electrophiles4 promise to provide expanded access to these motifs. In this report, we describe an alternate disconnection that provides simple and high yielding access to primary, secondary, and tertiary alkylboronic esters through the generation and electrophilic trap of α-boryl anions (Scheme 1).5 In so far as alkyl pinacol boronates are subject to efficient oxidation6 and amination,7 these methods constitute a reactivity Umpolung8 for alcohol and amine synthesis, and they offer convenient access to important reagents for other boron-based transformations.
Scheme 1. Utility of α-Boryl Carbanions.
The valence deficiency of three-coordinate boron can be used to stabilize anions at adjacent carbon centers.5 Thus, significant attention has been paid to the synthesis and reactions of these species. While the pKa of alkylboranes is low enough that they may be deprotonated with common amide bases (eq 1, Scheme 2),9 the inherent electrophilicity of the boron center often results in competing complexation between the Brønsted base and the Lewis acidic boron center (eq 2). To avoid this outcome, large ligand frameworks (i.e., L = mesityl, Scheme 2) are often employed and these may complicate substrate synthesis and also limit transformations of the product.10 Indeed, generation of α-monoboryl anions bearing commonly used boron substituents (i.e., pinacol boronates) by deprotonation pathways is generally ineffective.11,12
Scheme 2. Generation of α-Boryl Carbanions by Deborylation versus Deprotonation.
Recent studies in our laboratory have focused on the Pd-catalyzed enantioselective cross-couplings of geminal bis(boronates) such as 1 (Scheme 2).13,14 Mechanistic studies showed that transmetalation involving 1, in the presence of KOH, occurs with stereoinversion at carbon.15 This outcome is consistent with a mechanism involving a reaction of an “ate” complex with an electrophilic Pd center. This reactivity pattern appeared consonant with that of an α-boryl anion, and it was of interest to determine if Pd might be replaced with other electrophiles, thereby enabling alkylations such as that in eq 3. This reactivity paradigm would be in line with studies by Aggarwal on the stereospecific (invertive) reaction between electrophiles and secondary boron ate complexes.16,17 While related deborylative alkylations have been accomplished with geminal bis(dialkyl)boranes,18 only two examples involving bis(pinacol)boronates have been described and they were both limited to benzylic substrates and employed strong base promoters under cryogenic conditions.19 In this report, we describe an alkoxide-promoted deborylative alkylation of geminal boronates that applies to aliphatic primary, secondary, and tertiary derivatives and that can enable highly hindered C–C couplings between geminal boronates and alkyl halide electrophiles. We also provide the first direct experimental evidence that these reactions proceed through the intermediacy of highly reactive α-boryl carbanions. Given that geminal bis(boronates) are easily accessed on a large scale, such a reactivity pattern constitutes a practical strategy for the construction of common alkyl pinacol boronic esters.
To begin examining the deborylative alkylation reaction, preliminary experiments were conducted with geminal bis(boronate) 2 and bromododecane in the presence of anionic oxygen bases (Table 1). In analogy with our prior studies on cross-coupling, potassium hydroxide was examined as a promoter. In this experiment, little alkylation product 3 was detected with protodeboronation of the starting material 2 as the only reaction product. This outcome is consistent with eq 3, but with H+ as the electrophile. To favor the alkylation pathway, subsequent reactions were conducted under anhydrous reaction conditions and with alkoxide bases. As depicted in Table 1, reactions with tertiary sodium and potassium alkoxides were highly effective and delivered the deborylative alkylation product 3 in good to excellent yield after 3 h of reaction at rt. From the data in Table 1, it can be concluded that important features of effective reactions are that the promoters are strong nucleophiles (tert-butoxides > methoxides) and that dissociation of the metal alkoxide ion pair enhances reactivity (K+ > Na+ in toluene; THF > toluene for sodium alkoxides). For a full analysis of reaction conditions and promoters, see the Supporting Information (SI).
Table 1. Effect of Base and Solvent on the Deborylative Alkylation of Geminal Bis(boronate) 2a.
entry | base | solvent | conversion (%)b | yield (%)c |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KOH | THF | <5 | –d |
2 | LiOt-Bu | THF | <5 | –d |
3 | NaOi-Pr | THF | <5 | –d |
4 | NaOt-Bu | THF | 100 | 91 |
5 | KOMe | THF | 30 | –d |
6 | KOt-Bu | THF | 100 | 68 |
7 | NaOt-Bu | dioxane | 75 | 70 |
8 | NaOt-Bu | toluene | <5 | –d |
9 | KOt-Bu | toluene | 80 | 76 |
Conditions: Bromododecane (0.10 mmol, 0.2 M), 2 (0.13 mmol), and base (0.30 mmol).
Refers to consumption of bromododecane and was determined by 1H NMR versus an internal standard.
Isolated yield of purified material.
Partial protodeboronation of 2.
The scope of the alkoxide-promoted deborylative alkylation was investigated with a panel of substrates. As shown in Table 2, with 3 equiv of NaOtBu in THF, monosubstituted geminal boronates react with primary halides to furnish the secondary organoboronates in good yield. In addition to bromododecane examined in Table 1, it was found that chloro- and iodododecane also react efficiently to give 3 although iodododecane gives a slightly lower yield due to elimination of the iodide. While geminal bis(boronate) 5 required an elevated temperature and extended reaction time for an efficient reaction, it was still processed cleanly to the derived alkylation product 8. Of note, secondary alkyl bromide electrophiles are also suitable substrates (compound 9) and, importantly, a reactivity difference between primary and secondary alkyl halides enables selective alkylation of a primary bromide in the presence of the secondary one (compound 10). Allylic chlorides also reacted cleanly in an SN2 fashion (compounds 11–14). Lastly, it is notable that deborylative alkylation with diborylmethane 6 is an efficient strategy for single-carbon homologation/borylation of alkyl halides (compounds 15–17). With this substrate class, it is important to note that the unhindered diborylmethane 6 is vulnerable to deprotonation with NaOtBu; however, KOt-Bu in toluene allows effective transformation.
Table 2. Substrate Scope for Alkoxide-Promoted Deborylative Alkylation of Geminal Bis(boronates).
This experiment was conducted on 1 g scale.
2.0 equiv of diboron, 5.0 equiv of KOt-Bu, toluene.
This experiment was conducted for 14 h.
This experiment was conducted at 40 °C.
The alkoxide-promoted deborylative alkylation also extends to internal geminal bis(boronates) and allows construction of tertiary organoboronates (Table 3). While some alkylations required slightly elevated reaction temperatures, it is remarkable that construction of highly hindered reaction product 20 could proceed effectively at rt. Also of note, geminal bis(boryl)cyclopropanes, readily available from borylation of the corresponding 1,1-dibromocyclopropane,20 could be alkylated with good yield and with outstanding levels of stereocontrol (compounds 22 and 23).
Table 3. Deborylative Alkylation of Internal Geminal Bis(boronates).
This experiment was conducted at rt for 3 h.
This experiment was conducted at 50 °C for 14 h.
This experiment was conducted at 60 °C for 14 h.
Many of the substrates in Tables 2 and 3 were prepared by deprotonation and alkylation of readily available RCH(Bpin)2 precursors. When 1,n-dihalides are employed in this alkylation reaction, the product is predisposed for intramolecular ring-forming deborylative alkylation. As depicted in Table 4, this strategy provides an efficient route to cyclic organoboronates that are not readily available by other methods. In the event, LiTMP-mediated deprotonation of the geminal bis(boronate) occurs rapidly at 0 °C (15 min), and subsequent alkylation generally proceeds to completion within 30 min. This alkylation reaction reliably delivered cyclization precursors 24–29 in good yield. Subsequent treatment with sodium tert-butoxide in THF provided carbocyclic derivatives 30–35 in good yield. Of note, the stereocenter in the tether of 26 lends a useful level of stereocontrol in the deborylative cyclization, furnishing 32 as a 7:1 mixture of diastereomers.
Table 4. Intramolecular Deborylative Alkylation for the Construction of Carbocyclic Organoboronates.
To probe the utility of the deborylative alkylation for larger scale synthesis of important target structures, the construction of pharmaceutically relevant phenethylamines was examined. As depicted in Scheme 3, deborylative alkylation of 1,1-bis(boryl)ethane with benzyl chloride was conducted under nitrogen, but without the aid of a drybox during weighing and transfer manipulations. The construction of 36 occurred in 87% yield, and of note, this reaction sequence was conducted on a scale that delivered >6 g of 36. Amination of the pinacol boronate with lithiated methoxyamine7a proceeded with reasonable efficiency furnishing phenethylamine derivative 37 on a synthetically useful scale.
Scheme 3. Deborylative Alkylation for the Construction of Phenethylamine Building Blocks.
Regarding the reaction mechanism, generation of an α-boryl carbanion (A, Scheme 4), followed by alkylation, is one plausible pathway. For some substrates, it is also tenable that deprotonation of the bis(boronate) generates anion B, which then undergoes alkylation and protodeboronation. Lastly, it was considered that complexation between the alkoxide and the bis(boronate) might provide an “ate” complex (C) that participates directly in alkylation. To distinguish these pathways, the experiments in eqs 4 and 5 were conducted. When an equimolar mixture of 38 and deuterium-labeled 2 were subjected to the reaction conditions (eq 4), deuterium-labeled 3 was isolated in 93% yield with only a slight loss of deuterium content. This result suggests that alkylation of B is not likely the predominant pathway. To establish whether A or C is the reactive species involved in direct alkylation, deborylative alkylation of 10B-labeled nonracemic 4 was examined (eq 5). After separation of the product enantiomers, mass spectrometry revealed an identical isotopic distribution for each, suggesting a nonstereospecific reaction mechanism.21 Had C been involved in the direct stereoinvertive alkylation, then (S)-10B-4 would have given (R)-7 enriched in 10B and (S)-7 enriched in 11B. Thus, the observed experimental outcome is most consistent with the participation of an α-boryl carbanion (A) as opposed to nucleophilic “ate” complex C.
Scheme 4. Mechanistic Analysis of Deborylative Alkylation of Geminal Bis(boronates).
While multiple boron-containing species present in the reaction rendered 11B NMR analysis uninformative, spectroscopic support for the intermediacy of an α-boryl carbanion was gained through 13C NMR analysis (Scheme 5). Upon subjection of 13C-labeled 40 (13C δ = 22.5 ppm) to NaOtBu in THF, three new resonances (D, 41, and 42, Scheme 5) appear over the course of 3 h. The resonance at 27.1 ppm (D, Scheme 5) corresponds to the product of protodeboronation of 40; the resonance at 35.5 ppm appears at the beginning of the reaction and is attributed to ate complex 41 (Scheme 5); and the resonance at 49.1 ppm grows in more slowly than 41 and, on the basis of its reactivity, is assigned to α-boryl carbanion 42. Upon addition of bromododecane to the reaction mixture, the resonance at 49.1 ppm is immediately replaced with a resonance at 31.4 ppm, the latter of which corresponds to deborylative alkylation product 43. Two features are of note in this experiment: first, the chemical shift of putative intermediate 42 is far more downfield than is typical for an alkali-metal-derived carbanion (13C δ = −15.3 ppm for CH3Li22), presumably a consequence of delocalization of the electron density of the anion with the empty p orbital of the adjacent boron (C=B bonding). This bonding mode has been noted previously in the Mes2BCH2 anion.10 A second notable feature is the remarkable reaction rate between 42 and the alkyl halide, clearly suggesting that, for this reagent pair, the deborylation is the rate-limiting step of the overall reaction.23
Scheme 5. 13C-NMR Analysis of Deborylative Alkylation.
In summary, α-boryl carbanions are versatile reagents for organic synthesis and they are easily generated under mild reaction conditions from readily accessible starting materials. Their configurational instability may render them verastile prochiral nucleophiles in asymmetric catalysis, and these features are being probed. Studies to further characterize the properties of α-(pinacolato)boronate anions are also in progress.
Acknowledgments
The NIH (GM-59471) is acknowledged for financial support; AllyChem is acknowledged for a donation of B2(pin)2.
Supporting Information Available
Procedures, characterization, and spectral data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Funding Statement
National Institutes of Health, United States
Supplementary Material
References
- For reviews, see:; a Brown H. S.; Singaram B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 287. [Google Scholar]; b Organoboranes for Synthesis; Ramachandran P. V., Brown H. C., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 783; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2001. [Google Scholar]; c Matteson D. S.Stereodirected Synthesis with Organoboranes; Springer: New York, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- a Carroll A. M.; O’Sullivan T. P.; Guiry P. J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 609. [Google Scholar]; b Crudden C. M.; Edwards D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 4695. [Google Scholar]; c Burgess K.; Ohlmeyer M. J. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 1179. [Google Scholar]
- Brown H. C.; Cole T. E. Organometallics 1983, 2, 1316. [Google Scholar]
- a Bose S. K.; Fucke K.; Lie L.; Steel P. G.; Marder T. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Yang C.-T.; Zhang Z.-Q.; Tajuddin H.; Wu C.-C.; Liang J.; Liu J.-H.; Fu Y.; Czyzewska M.; Steel P. G.; Marder T. B.; Liu L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Ito H.; Kubota K. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Dudnik A. S.; Fu G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Yi J.; Liu J.-H.; Liang J.; Dai J.-J.; Yang C.-T.; Fu Y.; Liu L. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 1685. [Google Scholar]
- For an overview of boron-stabilized carbanions, see:; a Kliś T.; Luliński S.; Serwatowski J. Curr. Org. Chem. 2010, 14, 2549. [Google Scholar]; For a reivew of geminal dimetallics, see:; b Marek I.; Normant J.-F. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Kabalka G. W.; Wadgaonkar P. P.; Shoup T. M. Organometallics 1990, 9, 1316. [Google Scholar]; b Zweifel G.; Brown H. C. Org. React. 1963, 13, 1. [Google Scholar]; c Brown H. C.; Snyder C.; Subba Rao B. C.; Zweifel G. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 5505. [Google Scholar]
- Selected stereospecific amination:; a Mlynarski S. N.; Karns A. S.; Morken J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 16449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Bagutski V.; Elford T. G.; Aggarwal V. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Kim B. J.; Matteson D. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Hupe E.; Marek I.; Knochel P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Fernandez E.; Maeda K.; Hooper M. W.; Brown J. M. Chem.—Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Jego J. M.; Carboni B.; Vaultier M.; Carrié R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 142. [Google Scholar]; g Brown H. C.; Kim K. W.; Cole T. E.; Singaram B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6761. [Google Scholar]
- Seebach D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18, 239. [Google Scholar]
- Rathke M. W.; Kow R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6854. [Google Scholar]
- a Pelter A.; Singaram B.; Williams L.; Wilson J. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 623. [Google Scholar]; b Olmstead M. M.; Power P. P.; Weese K. J.; Doedens R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2541. [Google Scholar]; c Kawashima T.; Yamashita N.; Okazaki R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6142. [Google Scholar]
- For α-deprotonation of boronic esters bearing additional anion stabilizing substituents, see: Thioethers:; a Matteson D. S.; Arne K. H. Organometallics 1982, 1, 280. [Google Scholar]; b Matteson D. S.; Arne K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 1325. [Google Scholar]; Boronate (i.e., deprotonation of geminal bis(boronates)):; c Matteson D. S.; Moody R. J. Organmetallics 1982, 1, 20. [Google Scholar]; Trialkylsilyl:; d Matteson D. S.; Majumdar D. Organometallics 1983, 2, 230. [Google Scholar]
- For preparation of zinc-stabilized α-boryl carbanions from α-haloboronic esters, see:; a Knochel P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7431. [Google Scholar]; b Rozema M. J.; Sidduri A. R.; Knochel P. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1956. [Google Scholar]; For α-boryl carbanions by Sn–Li exchange, see:; c Matteson D. S.; Wilson J. W. Organometallics 1985, 4, 1690. [Google Scholar]
- Sun C.; Potter B.; Morken J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Endo K.; Ohkubo T.; Hirokami M.; Shibata T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Endo K.; Ohkubo T.; Shibata T. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Endo K.; Ohkubo T.; Ishioka T.; Shibata T. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 4826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For related cross-couplings with nonsymmetric geminal diboron compounds, see:; a Lee J. C. H.; McDonald R.; Hall D. G. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Feng X.; Jeon H.; Yun J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Larouche-Gauthier R.; Elford T. G.; Aggarwal V. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Mohiti M.; Rampalakos C.; Feeney K.; Leonaori D.; Aggarwal V. K. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 602. [Google Scholar]
- In the base-induced deborylative alkylation of tri- and tetra(alkoxyboronates), it was also posited that electrophilic trapping of an ate complex may be an operative mechanism. See:Matteson D. S.; Thomas J. R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1970, 24, 263. [Google Scholar]
- a Brown H. C.; Rhodes S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 4306. [Google Scholar]; b Zweifel G.; Fisher R. P.; Horng A. Synthesis 1973, 37. [Google Scholar]; c Zweifel G.; Arzoumanian H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 2535. [Google Scholar]; d Zweifel G.; Arzoumanian H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 291. [Google Scholar]
- For deborylation of benzylic geminal boronates by lithium amides and alkyllithiums, see:; a Reference (11c); b Wommack A. J.; Kingsbury J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 3163. [Google Scholar]; In our hands, deborylative alkylation of non-benzylic substrates 2, 6, and 27 with methyllithium, under a variety of conditions, is ineffective (<5%).
- Shimizu M.; Schelper M.; Nagao I.; Shimono K.; Kurahashi T.; Hiyama T. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 1222. [Google Scholar]
- For preparation of compound (S)-10B-4 and separation conditions for (S)- and (R)-7, see SI.
- Al-Humydi A.; Garrison J. C.; Youngs W. J.; Collins S. Organometallics 2005, 24, 193. [Google Scholar]
- For detailed procedure and spectra for this experiment, see SI.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.