Abstract
Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) is most commonly encountered in the soft tissue or bone in children and young adults, and its involvement in the intestines is exceedingly rare. To the best of our knowledge, eighteen cases have been reported to date. The present study reports three cases of PNET arising in the mesentery and ileocecum in 59- and 22-year-old males and a 36-year-old female. Computed tomography revealed a solid mass in the lower abdomen, with areas of cystic changes. Microscopically, the tumors were composed of small round cells arranged in sheets and rosettes with scant cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei and a high mitotic rate. The tumor cells were immunopositive for CD99 and FLI1. EWS/FLI1 translocations were detected in all cases. Case 1 and case 2 underwent tumor resection without any preoperative radiotherapy, chemotherapy or biological therapy. Case 3 underwent tumor resection and received eight cycles of IAP chemotherapy (2.0 mg ifosfamide, 80 mg epirubicin, 30 mg cisplatin 30mg). Case 3 was followed up for 34 months until they succumbed to peritoneal recurrence, whereas the other cases were not followed up. The incidence of these small round-cell tumors in the intestinal system, their clinical and pathological features and differential diagnosis are discussed with a review of the literature.
Keywords: primitive neuroectodermal tumor, mesentery, ileocecal
Introduction
Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) is a rare aggressive malignant small round cell tumour, which is most common in children and young adults (1). PNET belongs to the Ewing’s sarcoma family tumors (ESFT), due to its specific chromosomal translocation: t(11;22)(q24;q12) (2). It is thought to be of neural crest origin and is most commonly encountered in the soft tissue or bone (3). Reports of cases arising in the intestines are extremely rare. To the best of our knowledge, there are 18 cases in the literature (4–21). The present study reports three unusual cases of PNET arising from the mesentery and ileocecum and describes the presenting symptoms, imaging findings, pathological features and molecular genetics of the tumors.
Case reports
Ethics
The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jingling Hospital (Nanjing, China). Furthermore, informed consent was obtained from the relatives of each participating patient.
Case 1
In June 2005, a previously healthy 59-year-old male presented to the Department of Pathology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital (Nanjing, China) following 20 days of lower quadrant pain. Computed tomography (CT) scanning revealed a 5×6 cm mass in the lower quadrant. Tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9, were normal. Explorative laparotomy revealed a 6×5×3 cm mass in the mesentery of the terminal ileum, without any macroscopic spread elsewhere in the abdomen. Microscopically, the sections revealed the proliferation of small round cells in nests with a finely distributed chromatin pattern and rosette formation, hyperchromatic nuclei and scant cytoplasm, and the rosettes were diffusely infiltrated with fat. The tumor cells were positive for CD99, FLI1 and EMA, but negative for CD3, CgA, CD20, CKpan, S100 and HMB45. As no other foci were detected in extensive clinical and radiological investigations, the tumor was considered to be primary. Molecular testing demonstrated the expression of EWS/FLI1 fusion transcripts corresponding to the t(11;22)(q24;q12) translocation. Based on the above clinicopathological and genetic findings, a histopathological diagnosis of PNET developing from the mesentery of the terminal ileum was made. The patient was surgically treated for the tumor and administered with adjuvant chemotherapy.
Case 2
In September 2005, a 22-year-old male presented with abdominal intermittent abdominal pain of 20 days duration. Physical examination revealed the presence in the lower abdomen of a ~10×8 cm mass, with an uneven surface and no tenderness. Abdominal CT showed a mass (10×11 cm) in the lower abdomen and pelvis; it also revealed multiple areas of intrahepatic cystic density. Explorative laparotomy revealed that the mass adhered tightly to the sigmoid colon, rectum and omentum. The left lateral lobe and right lobe of the liver could touch two obvious nodules, 6 and 8 cm in diameter, respectively. Due to massive intraoperative blood loss and hypotension, the patient did not undergo liver tumor resection. Macroscopic examination revealed a grayish-brown, soft tissue mass, with varicose veins on the surface and areas of cystic changes. Microscopically, the tumor featured a uniform, sheet-like proliferation of small round tumor cells with high mitosis. Focally the tumor cells also formed ribbon-like or rosette-like structures, with areas of hemorrhage and necrosis, and infiltration into adipose tissue. The mesenteric lymph nodes were free. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells showed diffuse membrane positivity for CD99, Syn and FLI1. There was a punctate pattern of positive staining for S100 and negativity for CKpan, CD3, CD34, SMA, HMB45, MelanA and CgA. EWS/FLI1 fusion gene translocation demonstrated the translocation t(11;22)(q24;q12). The final diagnosis was intestinal PNET with liver metastases. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was not administered.
Case 3
In January 2009, a 36-year-old female was admitted to hospital with abdominal pain and an abdominal mass. On physical examination, a large and firm mass was evident in the right abdomen. Laboratory evaluation showed a CA125 level of 57.41 IU/ml (normal, 35 IU/ml), whereas the CA199 levels were within normal limits. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a large mass in the pelvis (Fig. 1). A provisional diagnosis of right accessory malignancy was made. Exploratory laparotomy revealed that the mass was localized in the ileocecal region and adhered to the sigmoid colon, with no adhesion to the uterus or fallopian tubes. There was also a large quantity (~500 ml) of bloody, jelly-like liquid within the abdominal cavity. On gross examination, a huge mass in the ileocecum, measuring 15×15×13 cm, with a cauliflower-like appearance was found. The mass was grayish-black in color with a hard texture. Histologically, the tumor consisted of small round cells arranged in diffuse sheets with uniform rosette formation, large and round nuclei, hyperchromatic nuclei and scant cytoplasm. Large areas of necrosis were also present. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated diffuse membrane positivity of the tumor cells for vimentin, FLI1 and CD99 and negativity for CKpan, CgA, Syn, CD117, HMB45, S100, CD20 and CD3 (Fig. 2). The EWS/FLI1 fusion transcript of the t(11,22)(q24;q12) translocation was also detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; Fig. 3). Due to the unusual location of the tumor in the mesentery, the patient succumbed from peritoneal recurrence 34 months after the surgery.
Discussion
PNET is a rare aggressive malignant small round cell tumor most commonly arising in the central nervous system, soft tissues or bones, which was first recognized by Stout in 1918 (22). The progenitor cells are possibly neural crest cells (1). PNET is usually seen along the central axis, particularly in the soft tissue or bone in children and young adults. This rare and aggressive tumor has been described in the kidney (23), uterine cervix (24) and pancreas (25). Regardless of the point of origin, these tumors are highly aggressive, often quickly metastasizing to the lung and bone. To the best of our knowledge, 18 cases of intestinal PNET have been reported previously (Table I). The cases were eight males and 10 females, with an average age at presentation of 29 years (range, 9–63 years); 12 cases were aged ≤40 years. Its incidence in older individuals, as in case 1 in the present study, is quite rare. The small bowel, and its mesentery, is the most common site (15 cases); others occurred in the duodenum and mesocolon. The present study describes another unusual location, namely the ileocecum (case 3).
Table I.
Authors (ref.) | Age (years)/gender | Location | Tumor size and/or weight | Positive immunomarker | Follow-up |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Balasubramanian et al (4) | 53/F | Small bowel mesentery | 25×26×17.5 cm; 2.6 kg | MIC-2 and PGP9.5 strongly | NM |
2 Sethi and Smith (5) | 44/M | Small bowel | 120 mm diameter | MIC-2 strongly and NSE weakly | Succumbed with recurrence, 13 mo |
3 Bala et al (6) | 57/F | Small bowel mesentery | 12 cm diameter | Vimentin, NSE, O-13, c-Kit, FLI | NED, 8 mo |
4 Horie and Kato (7) | 40/M | Small bowel mesentery | 11×8 cm | CD99, NSE, syn and vimentin. | Succumbed with recurrence, 5 mo |
5 Tokudome et al (8) | 24/F | Transverse colonic mesentery | 12×10×7 cm, 590 g | NSE and Mic-2 | NED, 20 mo |
6 Maisonnette et al (9) | 56/F | Mesocolon | 12×14×12 cm | CD99 and FLI1 | Succumbed to acute respiratory failure, 13 mo |
7 Adair et al (10) | 21/F | Duodenum | NM | CD99 and CK | 10 mo DFS |
8 Rodarte-Shade et al (11) | 32/M | Small bowel | 12×8 cm | CD99 and FLI1 | 6 mo DFS |
9 Sarangarajan et al (12) | 13/M | Jejunum | NM | CD99 and CK | 12 mo DFS |
10 Graham et al (13) | 14/M | Small bowel and mesentery | 6×3.5×3 cm | CD99 and CK | 10 mo DFS |
11 Vignali et al (14) | 15/F | Ileum | 12×9×8 cm | NM | NM |
12 Kim et al (15) | 63/M | Small bowel | NM | CD99 and CD117 | NM |
13 Shek et al (16) | 9/F | Small bowel and mesentery | NM | CD99 | 18 mo DFS |
14 Boehm et al (17) | 18/M | Ileum | NM | NM | NM |
15 Kie et al (18) | 20/F | Duodenum | NM | CD99 | 18 mo DFS |
16 Prasertvit and Stoikes (19) | 28/F | Small intestine | NM | NM | NM |
17 Turkyilmaz et al (20) | 15/F | Mesocolon | 10×10×12 cm | Vimentin and CD99 | NM |
18 Kim et al (21) | 23/M | Mesentery of jejunum | 12×8×7.5 cm | CD99, CD57 and NSE | NM |
PNET, primitive neuroectodermal tumor; NM, not mentioned; DFS, disease-free survival; NED, no evidence of disease; Mo, months; ref, reference.
In the current study, all cases were primary to the mesentery and ileocecum, with no evidence of the PNET arising elsewhere. The maximum tumor diameter was 6–15 cm. The histologic appearance of the tumor typically comprised round-to-ovoid hyperchromatic cells with minimal cytoplasm, arranged in nests with variable rosette formation. Immunohistological examinations usually revealed CD99 and FLI1 positivity. FISH analysis indicated the presence of EWSR1 gene rearrangement in these three patients.
Making an accurate diagnosis is critical for optimal patient management and prognostication. Physical examination often reveals an abdominal or pelvic mass with recurrent abdominal pain. Imaging examination such as CT scanning is able to provide important information regarding the size of the mass, the involvement of adjacent structures and the presence of metastasis. There are no suggestive blood markers that can be used to diagnose PNET. Mhawech-Fauceglia et al (26) demonstrated that the most sensitive and specific test panel for the diagnosis of Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET is a combination of CD99 and FLI1. Recently, Yoshida et al (27) reported that the NKX2.2 gene, as an important target of EWS-FLI1, is a valuable marker for PNET, with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 89%. The genetic hallmark is the presence of a specific translocation t(11;22)(q24;q12), which is expressed in 90–95% of patients (28).
It is difficult to differentiate PNET from other small round-cell tumors. However, immunohistochemical examinations with myogenic, neurogenic, and lymphoid cell markers can rule out many of these tumors. In gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), histological examination reveals a trabecular or solid arrangement and immunohistochemical analysis reveals the expression of neuroendocrine markers (Syn and CgA) (29). In type II enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, histological examination of the lymphoma cells reveals full-thickness infiltration of the intestinal wall. A notable difference from PNET is the presence of villous atrophy, cryptal hyperplasia and intraepithelial lymphocytosis. The tumor cells express CD3, CD43 and CD8 (30). Metastatic carcinoma has a high incidence in older patients and often has a definite primary lesion, good adhesion between cells, nested or irregular glandular structure, cellular atypia and mitotic activity. In addition, specific immune markers suggestive of tissue origin are positive. For metastatic malignant melanoma, the majority of cases have an antecedent history of melanoma (skin and mucous membrane), morphological diversity is observed, and lipofuscin granules are visible in the cytoplasm. Malignant melanoma often has diffuse positivity for S-100 protein as well as possible positivity for melanocytic markers, including HMB45 and MelanA (31).
There is no established treatment modality for intestinal PNET. Surgical excision when complete offers the best chance for survival and adjuvant radiotherapy may reduce local recurrence (32). Combination chemotherapy has traditionally included vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin. The addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to a standard regimen significantly improves the outcome for patients with nonmetastatic Ewing’s sarcoma (33). The prognosis of mesenteric PNET is better compared with that of other sites and is not associated with the size of the tumor. The 5-year disease-free survival rate of patients without metastatic disease is >60% compared with 35% for patients who present with metastatic disease (6). In reviewing the literature, it was observed that two patients succumbed due to recurrence, one succumbed to acute respiratory failure, and two survived with no evidence of disease. The duration of follow-up ranged from 6 to 20 months. The average survival time was 12 months. In the patients of the present study, case 3 was followed up for 34 months and succumbed due to peritoneal recurrence. However, cases 1 and 2 were not followed up.
In conclusion, the present study reviewed 18 known cases of PNET arising from the intestine and mesentery and reported three additional cases. Immunohistochemical examination and molecular characterization are beneficial for differentiating PNET from other small round-cell tumors.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371611, 81171391, 81372743) and the National Basic Research Priorities Program 973 Project (2014CB744504) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.
References
- 1.Dehner LP. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor and Ewing’s sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17:1–13. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199301000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Folpe AL, Goldblum JR, Rubin BP, et al. Morphologic and immunophenotypic diversity in Ewing family tumors: a study of 66 genetically confirmed cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1025–1033. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Burchill SA. Ewing’s sarcoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of molecular abnormalities. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:96–102. doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.2.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Balasubramanian B, Dinakarababu E, Molyneux AJ. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumour of the small bowel mesentery: case report. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28:197–198. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sethi B, Smith GT. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumour arising in the small bowel. Histopathology. 2007;50:665–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bala M, Maly A, Remo N, et al. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bowel mesentery in adults. Isr Med Assoc J. 2006;8:515–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Horie Y, Kato M. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the small bowel mesentery: a case showing perforation at onset. Pathol Int. 2000;50:398–403. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2000.01045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tokudome N, Tanaka K, Kai MH, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the transverse colonic mesentery defined by the presence of EWS-FLI1 chimeric mRNA in a Japanese woman. J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:543–549. doi: 10.1007/s005350200084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maisonnette F, Roux ET, Abita T, et al. Ewing sarcoma of the mesocolon. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2007;31:552–554. doi: 10.1016/S0399-8320(07)89427-9. (In French) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Adair A, Harris SA, Coppen MJ, Hurley PR. Extraskeletal Ewings sarcoma of the small bowel: case report and literature review. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001;46:372–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rodarte-Shade M, Palomo-Hoil R, Vazquez J, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of the small bowel in a young adult with lower gastrointestinal bleeding. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2012;4 doi: 10.1007/s12029-012-9409-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sarangarajan R, Hill DA, Humphrey PA, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the biliary and gastrointestinal tracts: clinicopathologic and molecular diagnostic study of two cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2001;4:185–191. doi: 10.1007/s100240010141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Graham DK, Stork LC, Wei Q, et al. Molecular genetic analysis of a small bowel primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002;5:86–90. doi: 10.1007/s10024-001-0192-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vignali M, Zacchè MM, Messori P, et al. Ewing’s sarcoma of the small intestine misdiagnosed as a voluminous pedunculated uterine leiomyoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162:234–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim DW, Chang HJ, Jeong JY, et al. Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (ES/PNET) of the small bowel: a rare cause of intestinal obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:1137–1138. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0142-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shek TW, Chan GC, Khong PL, et al. Ewing sarcoma of the small intestine. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001;23:530–532. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200111000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Boehm R, Till H, Landes J, et al. Ileoileal intussusception caused by a Ewing sarcoma tumour. An unusual case report. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2003;13:272–275. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kie JH, Lee MK, Kim CJ, et al. Primary Ewing’s sarcoma of the duodenum: a case report. Int J Surg Pathol. 2003;11:331–337. doi: 10.1177/106689690301100416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prasertvit S, Stoikes N. A rare case of ewing’s sarcoma of the small intestine. Am Surg. 2013;79:E78–E79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Turkyilmaz Z, Sonmez K, Karabulut R, et al. Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma of the mesocolon in a child. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:E1–E3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim JM, Chu YC, Choi CH, et al. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor with osseous component of the small bowel mesentery: a case study. Korean J Pathol. 2013;47:77–81. doi: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stout AP. A tumor of the ulnar nerve. Proc NY Pathol Soc. 1914;18:2–12. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Risi E, Iacovelli R, Altavilla A, et al. Clinical and pathological features of primary neuroectodermal tumor/ewing sarcoma of the kidney. Urology. 2013;82:382–386. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Malpica A, Moran CA. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervix: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of two cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2002;6:281–287. doi: 10.1053/adpa.2002.35739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shi L, Guo Z, Wu X. Primary pulmonary primitive neuroectodermal tumor metastasis to the pancreas: a rare case with seven-year follow-up. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Herrmann F, Penetrante R, et al. Diagnostic utility of FLI-1 monoclonal antibody and dual-colour, break-apart probe fluorescence in situ (FISH) analysis in Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumour (EWS/PNET). A comparative study with CD99 and FLI-1 polyclonal antibodies. Histopathology. 2006;49:569–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yoshida A, Sekine S, Tsuta K, et al. NKX2.2 is a useful immunohistochemical marker for Ewing sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:993–999. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31824ee43c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Saxena R, Sait S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P. Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney: a case report. Diagnosed by immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2006;10:363–366. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2005.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lindholm DP, Oberg K. Biomarkers and molecular imaging in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Horm Metab Res. 2011;43:832–837. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1287794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chan JK, Chan AC, Cheuk W, et al. Type II enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: a distinct aggressive lymphoma with frequent γδ T-cell receptor expression. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1557–1569. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318222dfcd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McCluggage WG. Ovarian neoplasms composed of small round cells: a review. Adv Anat Pathol. 2004;11:288–296. doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000138146.357376.1e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marec-Bérard P, Chotel F, Claude L. PNET/Ewing tumours: current treatments and future perspectives. Bull Cancer. 2010;97:707–713. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2010.1120. (In French) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Grier HE, Krailo MD, Tarbell NJ, et al. Addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy for Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:694–701. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]