Abstract
Background
Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) rs2735940 polymorphism was found to be associated with increased cancer risk. However, recent studies reported controversial results. The aim of our study was to detect its relationship with cancer risk.
Material/Methods
EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched for all publications until October 2014. ORs and 95% CIs were applied to investigate the association in the random-effects model.
Results
Thirteen case-control studies with 19385 cases and 17558 controls were included in this study. We found a significant association between cancer risk and TERT rs2735940 polymorphism (OR=1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.11, P=0.005). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a marginal association was found in Caucasians (OR=1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.10, P=0.05), but not in Asians (OR=1.01, 95% CI 0.82–1.24, P=0.93). In the subgroup analysis by cancer site, this polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk (OR=1.08, 95% CI 1.02–1.13, P=0.004).
Conclusions
TERT rs2735940 polymorphism was significantly associated with cancer risk, especially lung cancer.
MeSH Keywords: Breast Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Polymorphism, Genetic; Telomerase
Background
Cancer is a common disease, which results from interactions between genetic and environmental factors [1]. Telomerase is upregulated in the majority of cancers [2]. Human telomerase catalytic subunit, encoded by telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene, has been shown to be a rate-limiting determinant of telomerase activity and maintains genomic stability by adding the telomere repeat TTAGGG to telomere ends [3]. TERT was found to be over-expressed in non-small cell lung cancer [4, 5]. TERT was also an independent poor prognostic marker for disease-free survival [6]. TERT siRNA effectively suppressed the expression of TERT mRNA and TERT protein levels, reduced telomerase activity, and induced apoptosis of cancer cells [7,8]. Previous studies have shown that telomere length was associated with cancer risk [9]. Several TERT single-nucleotide polymorphisms had modest association with telomere length [10]. Therefore, TERT polymorphisms might influence the risk of cancers.
Recently, some meta-analyses have investigated the association between TERT polymorphisms and some cancers risks [11,12]. However, all of these meta-analyses focused on TERT rs2736098 and rs2736100. Many studies also assessed the relationship of TERT rs2735940 polymorphism and cancer risk and reported controversial results [10,13–24]. In addition, Zhang et al. indicated that TERT rs2735940 polymorphism was significantly associated with telomere length [20]. Thus, we did this meta-analysis to calculate the relationship between cancer risk and TERT rs2735940 polymorphism.
Material and Methods
Publication search
Two databases – PubMed and EMBASE – were searched to find relevant articles. The following keywords were used: (‘telomerase reverse transcriptase” or “TERT”) and (“tumor” or “cancer” or “neoplasms”) and (“polymorphism” or “mutation”). The last search date was October 22, 2014. The language of the papers was not restricted. All references cited in these studies and previously published review articles were searched for additional eligible studies.
Study selection
Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) evaluation of the association of the TERT rs2735940 polymorphism and cancer risk; (2) a case-control study or a cohort study; (3) an available genotype or allele frequency. Studies were excluded if they were: (1) family or animal studies; (2) containing overlapping data; (3) reviews or abstracts.
Data extraction
Data would be extracted by 2 independent authors. The following data were extracted from each article: author, country, publication year, ethnicity, site of cancer, and numbers of the cases and controls.
Statistical analysis
The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of the controls was calculated by chi-square test. OR and 95% CI were applied to determine the strength of the association between the TERT rs2735940 polymorphism and cancer risk. The OR and respective 95% CI were calculated by comparing TT+CT vs. CC. We used Q statistic to assess the heterogeneity. A P value <0.1 was regarded as suggesting large heterogeneity. The random-effects model was adopted to assess the overall OR value. Subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity and site of cancer. We carried out the cumulative meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted. Funnel plot was used to assess evidence for potential publication bias. STATA 11.0 software was used to do all the statistical tests.
Results
Eligible studies
Thirteen studies with 19385 cases and 17558 controls were enrolled in our meta-analysis [10,13–24]. One study reported 5 independent case-control studies and 1 study reported 2 case-control studies; thus, a total of 18 case-control studies were included. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the included studies. Most of the studies were conducted in Caucasians, while 5 case-control studies conducted in Asians. There were 5 studies of lung cancer, 3 studies of breast cancer, 2 studies of prostate cancer, and 2 studies of bladder cancer. All studies were in HWE.
Table 1.
Characteristics of included studies.
| Author | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Cases | Controls | Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium | Cancer site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Savage | 2007 | Poland | Caucasian | 2202 | 2360 | Yes | Breast |
| Hosgood | 2008 | China | Asian | 121 | 110 | Yes | Lung |
| Guey | 2009 | Spain | Caucasian | 990 | 1033 | Yes | Bladder |
| Rafnar | 2009 | Iceland | Caucasian | 4912 | 1551 | Yes | Basal cell carcinoma, bladder, cervix, lung, prostate |
| Choi | 2009 | Korea | Asian | 720 | 720 | Yes | Lung |
| Shen | 2010 | America | Mixed | 978 | 1045 | Yes | Breast |
| Pande | 2011 | America | Caucasian | 1681 | 1235 | Yes | Lung |
| Liu | 2011 | America | Caucasian | 888 | 885 | Yes | Head and neck |
| Hofer | 2012 | Austria | Caucasian | 137 | 1705 | Yes | Colorectal |
| Walsh | 2012 | America | African | 1308 | 1241 | Yes | Lung |
| Sheng | 2012 | China | Asian | 569 | 669 | Yes | Acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
| Iizuka | 2013 | Japan | Asian | 1347 | 909 | Yes | Mixed and prostate |
| Pellatt | 2013 | America | Mixed | 3532 | 4095 | Yes | Breast |
Meta-analysis
We found a significant association between cancer risk and TERT rs2735940 polymorphism (OR=1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.11, P=0.005, Figure 1). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a marginal association was found in Caucasians (OR=1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.10, P=0.05), but not in Asians (OR=1.01, 95% CI 0.82–1.24, P=0.93). In the subgroup analysis by cancer site, this polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk (OR=1.08, 95% CI 1.02–1.13, P=0.004). No significant association was found in risk of breast cancer (OR=1.00, 95% CI 0.86–1.16, P=0.97), prostate cancer (OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.73–1.23, P=0.68), or bladder cancer (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.84–1.16, P=0.87). Table 2 shows the main results of this study.
Figure 1.
Meta-analysis of the association between TERT rs2735940 polymorphism and cancer risk.
Table 2.
Summary of results from meta-analysis and subgroup analysis.
| Comparison | No. of studies | No. of cases and controls | OR (95% CI) | P value | Pheterogeneity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT+CT vs. CC | Overall | 18 | 19385/17558 | 1.06 (1.02–1.11) | 0.005 | 0.37 |
| TT+CT vs. CC | Asian | 5 | 2757/2408 | 1.01 (0.82–1.24) | 0.93 | 0.03 |
| TT+CT vs. CC | Caucasian | 10 | 10810/8769 | 1.05 (1.00–1.10) | 0.05 | 0.45 |
| TT+CT vs. CC | Lung | 5 | 4531/4857 | 1.08 (1.02–1.13) | 0.004 | 0.55 |
| TT+CT vs. CC | Breast | 3 | 6712/7500 | 1.00 (0.86–1.16) | 0.97 | 0.05 |
| TT+CT vs. CC | Prostate | 2 | 2235/1869 | 0.95 (0.73–1.23) | 0.68 | 0.88 |
| TT+CT vs. CC | Bladder | 2 | 1453/2584 | 0.99 (0.84–1.16) | 0.87 | 0.47 |
Cumulative meta-analysis suggested that the results were stable (data not shown). Sensitivity analysis was also done; the results were not changed when each study was excluded, suggesting the robustness of the results (data not shown). The shape of the funnel plot did not show obvious asymmetry (Figure 2) and Begg’s test also found no significant publication bias (P=0.75).
Figure 2.
Funnel plot for the association between TERT rs2735940 polymorphism and cancer risk.
Discussion
In this meta-analysis with 19385 cases and 17558 controls, we investigated the association between cancer risk and TERT rs2735940 polymorphism. Results of this study indicate that individuals with the TERT rs2735940 polymorphism had an increased risk of cancer. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a significant association was observed in Caucasians but not in Asians. However, only 5 studies on this polymorphism in Asians were included. Thus, ethnic difference might be due to chance. In the subgroup analysis by site of cancer, we found TERT rs2735940 polymorphism exhibited increased lung cancer risk. This result indicates that TERT rs2735940 polymorphism may play the same role in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. Previous studies suggested that TERT rs2735940 polymorphism contributed to longer telomere length [25]. Longer telomere length was associated with the increased breast cancer risk and lung cancer risk [10,26]. Therefore, TERT rs2735940 polymorphism could increase the risks of lung cancer and breast cancer.
Sensitivity analysis and cumulative meta-analysis results revealed that our results were stable. Heterogeneity is an important issue in meta-analysis; however, no significant heterogeneity was detected in this meta-analysis. Funnel plots suggested that there was no significant publication bias. These results taken together show that the results of this meta-analysis are reliable.
There were also some limitations to this study. First, we only included published articles in this meta-analysis; thus, several unpublished studies might have been missed. Second, we did not assess the interactions of gene-gene and gene-environment due to lack of sufficient information. Finally, most of the included studies were carried out in Asians and Caucasians; therefore, further studies in different ethnic populations, especially Africans, are needed to confirm the results of this meta-analysis.
Conclusions
This study suggests that TERT rs2735940 polymorphism is associated with increased cancer risk. Future studies are warranted to validate this finding in different populations.
Footnotes
Source of support: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11472224) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 2014JM1002)
References
- 1.Bredberg A. Cancer: more of polygenic disease and less of multiple mutations? A quantitative viewpoint. Cancer. 2011;117(3):440–45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim NW, Piatyszek MA, Prowse KR, et al. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science. 1994;266(5193):2011–15. doi: 10.1126/science.7605428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nakamura TM, Morin GB, Chapman KB, et al. Telomerase catalytic subunit homologs from fission yeast and human. Science. 1997;277(5328):955–59. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Strazisar M, Mlakar V, Glavac D. The expression of COX-2, hTERT, MDM2, LATS2 and S100A2 in different types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2009;14:442–56. doi: 10.2478/s11658-009-0011-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zeng B, Hu J, Yuan R, et al. Increased expression of importin13 in endometriosis and endometrial carcinoma. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(6):CR361–67. doi: 10.12659/MSM.882879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhu CQ, Cutz JC, Liu N, et al. Amplification of telomerase (hTERT) gene is a poor prognostic marker in non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1452–59. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xie M, Chen Q, He S, et al. Silencing of the human TERT gene by RNAi inhibits A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2011;26:1019–27. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang Y, Chen L, Yang S, Fang D. E2F1: a potential negative regulator of hTERT transcription in normal cells upon activation of oncogenic c-Myc. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(1):RA12–15. doi: 10.12659/MSM.882192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Burke LS, Hyland PL, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Telomere length and the risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in melanoma-prone families with and without CDKN2A mutations. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pellatt AJ, Wolff RK, Torres-Mejia G, et al. Telomere length, telomere-related genes, and breast cancer risk: the breast cancer health disparities study. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2013;52(7):595–609. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang HM, Zhang XY, Jin B. TERT genetic polymorphism rs2736100 was associated with lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on 14,492 subjects. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013;17(12):937–41. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Qi HY, Zou P, Zhao L, et al. TERT rs2736098 polymorphism and cancer risk: results of a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(7):3483–88. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.7.3483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Savage SA, Chanock SJ, Lissowska J, et al. Genetic variation in five genes important in telomere biology and risk for breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(6):832–36. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hosgood HD, III, Menashe I, Shen M, et al. Pathway-based evaluation of 380 candidate genes and lung cancer susceptibility suggests the importance of the cell cycle pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(10):1938–43. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guey LT, García-Closas M, Murta-Nascimento C, et al. EPICURO/Spanish Bladder Cancer Study investigators. Genetic susceptibility to distinct bladder cancer subphenotypes. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):283–92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rafnar T, Sulem P, Stacey SN, et al. Sequence variants at the TERT-CLPTM1L locus associate with many cancer types. Nat Genet. 2009;41(2):221–27. doi: 10.1038/ng.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Choi JE, Kang HG, Jang JS, et al. Polymorphisms in telomere maintenance genes and risk of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(10):2773–81. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shen J, Gammon MD, Wu HC, et al. Multiple genetic variants in telomere pathway genes and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(1):219–28. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pande M, Spitz MR, Wu X, et al. Novel genetic variants in the chromosome 5p15.33 region associate with lung cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(10):1493–99. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu Z, Ma H, Wei S, et al. Telomere length and TERT functional polymorphisms are not associated with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(12):2642–45. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hofer P, Baierl A, Bernhart K, et al. Association of genetic variants of human telomerase with colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer risk. Mol Carcinog. 2012;51(Suppl 1):E176–82. doi: 10.1002/mc.21911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Walsh KM, Gorlov IP, Hansen HM, et al. Fine-mapping of the 5p15.33, 6p22.1-p21.31, and 15q25.1 regions identifies functional and histology-specific lung cancer susceptibility loci in African-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(2):251–60. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1007-T. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sheng X, Tong N, Tao G, et al. TERT polymorphisms modify the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Chinese children. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(1):228–35. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Iizuka T, Sawabe M, Takubo K, et al. hTERT promoter polymorphism, −1327C>T, is associated with the risk of epithelial cancer. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):249. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang W, Chen Y, Yang X, et al. Functional haplotypes of the hTERT gene, leukocyte telomere length shortening, and the risk of peripheral arterial disease. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Seow WJ, Cawthon RM, Purdue MP, et al. Telomere length in white blood cell DNA and lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three prospective cohorts. Cancer Res. 2014;74(15):4090–98. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]