Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2014 Nov 9;136(10):2481–2485. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29291

Neonatal Vitamin D and Childhood Brain Tumor Risk

Parveen Bhatti 1,2, David R Doody 1, Roberta Mckean-Cowdin 3, Beth A Mueller 1,2
PMCID: PMC4355103  NIHMSID: NIHMS638788  PMID: 25348494

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women is common. Compelling animal evidence suggests carcinogenic effects of vitamin D deficiency on the brains of offspring; however the impact of circulating vitamin D [25(OH)D] on childhood brain tumor (CBT) risk has not been previously evaluated. Using linked birth-cancer registry data in Washington State, 247 CBT cases (< 15 years at diagnosis; born 1991 or later) were identified. 247 birth year, sex and race-matched controls were selected from the remaining birth certificates. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure circulating levels of vitamin D3 [25-(OH)D3] in neonatal dried blood spots. Overall, no significant associations were observed. However, when stratified by median birth weight (3,458 grams), there was evidence of increasing risk of CBT with increasing 25-(OH)D3 among children in the higher birth weight category. Compared to the lowest quartile (2.8-7.7 ng/mL), odds ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for the 2nd (7.7-< 11.0 ng/mL), 3rd (11.0-<14.7 ng/mL) and 4th (14.7-37.0) quartiles of 25-(OH)D3 were 1.7 (1.0-3.3), 2.4 (1.2-4.8) and 2.6 (1.2-5.6), respectively. Among children in the lower birth weight category, there was suggestive evidence of a protective effect: ORs and 95% CI for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th quartiles were 0.9 (0.4-1.9), 0.7 (0.3-1.4) and 0.6 (0.3-1.3), respectively. Any associations of neonatal vitamin D with CBT may be birth weight-specific, suggesting the possible involvement of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), circulating levels of which have been associated with vitamin D and accelerated fetal growth.

Keywords: brain cancer, pediatric cancer, vitamin D, birth weight

Introduction

Decreased circulating vitamin D [25-(OH)D] has been associated with increased risks of various adult onset cancers, particularly colorectal cancer1; however, no studies of 25-(OH)D and risk of childhood cancers have been conducted. 25-(OH)D deficiency during gestational development may be particularly relevant to childhood brain tumor (CBT) risk, since animal studies of prenatal vitamin D depletion have demonstrated increased proliferation and reduced apoptotic cell death in neuronal cells and increased brain size and altered brain shape2,3. This negative impact of vitamin D restriction is concerning since recent data suggest that vitamin D deficiency is common among pregnant women4,5. For example, in a US study of 494 pregnant women, 41% were vitamin D deficient [25-(OH)D <20 ng/mL] and another 41% were vitamin D insufficient [25-(OH)D = 20-32 ng/mL]5.

To examine the association of gestational levels of 25-(OH)D with risk of CBT, we conducted a case-control study using linked birth certificate and cancer registry data from Washington State in conjunction with archived neonatal dried blood spots (DBS) to generate proxy measures of gestational 25-(OH)D. We also explored potential differential effects of 25-(OH)D by various factors including birth weight, maternal smoking, season of birth and CBT subtypes.

Materials and Methods

Study Subjects

Study procedures were approved by the Washington State and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Institutional Review Boards. All newly diagnosed CBT cases <15 years old were identified through the Cancer Surveillance System of Western Washington and the Washington State Cancer Registry. Potentially eligible cases, identified by cancer-birth registry linkage, were restricted to those born in Washington State during 1991–2010 since these were the earliest and latest years for which archived DBS and cancer registry data were available, respectively. Controls were selected (1:1) from the remaining birth records, matched to cases on year of birth, race (White, Black, Asian or Other) and sex. Additional information available from the birth records included maternal (age and education at delivery and prenatal smoking) and infant characteristics (gestational length, birth month and birth weight). This information was augmented by linked hospital discharge records for the birth hospitalization. Twins or infants born to mothers receiving transfusions and/or receiving treatment for neonatal jaundice were excluded. A total of 374 CBT cases were identified. Size for gestational age was calculated by evaluating the 10th and 90th percentile of the birth weight distribution of Washington State (1989 – 2009) for each week of gestational age, and classified as small for gestational age (SGA; birth weights ≤10th percentile), appropriate for gestational age (AGA; birth weights between 10th and 90th percentiles) or large for gestational age (LGA; birth weights ≥90th percentile).

A list of 374 case/control pairs, prioritized for inclusion by histology, was submitted to the Newborn Screening Archives. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) (ICD-O-3: 9470, 9471, 9473, 9474) and ependymomas (ICD-O-3: 9391, 9392) were first targeted for inclusion. Astrocytomas were prioritized by histological subtype (high to low priority) as follows: aniplastic astrocytoma (ICD-O-3: 9401), glioblastoma NOS (ICD-O-3: 9440), giant cell glioblastoma (ICD-O-3: 9441), malignant glioma (ICD-O-3: 9380), fibrillary astrocytoma (ICD-O-3: 9420), astrocytoma NOS (ICD-O-3: 9400), pleomorphic astrocytoma (ICD-O-3: 9424) and pilocytic astrocytoma (ICD-O-3: 9421). If a DBS could not be obtained for either a case or the matched control, both subjects were excluded and the next case/control pair was considered on the list until a total of 250 case/control pairs had been selected.

Neonatal Dried Blood Spots

Neonatal DBS are stored at room temperature by the Newborn Screening Archives for 21 years. From the first 250 case/control pairs for which DBS were successfully located, archive staff removed a 6.35mm punch from the center of a fully saturated DBS and placed the punch in a wax sample bag for delivery to the measurement laboratory. Before release, specimens were anonymized by staff using a previously described protocol6. Punches were also taken from five finger stick dried blood spots that were collected from each of five healthy adult volunteers (n=25 DBS) and randomly distributed among study samples for quality control assurance.

Vitamin D Measurements

25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 were measured in DBS using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) by ZRT Laboratory (Beaverton, OR)7,8. Levels of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 in the blood spots were adjusted to equivalent serum levels using an equation derived from a previous analysis of vitamin D from six matched pairs of finger stick blood spots and venipuncture serum samples collected from healthy volunteers7. 25(OH)D2 was detected in 8% of the study samples, so only 25(OH)D3, which was detected in 98% of the samples, was considered for further analysis [limit of detection (LOD) for 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 was 4ng/mL]. For those samples with 25(OH)D3 below the LOD, a value of 2.83 (LOD/√2) was assigned 9. In the QC samples, 25(OH)D3 ranged from 6.9 ng/mL to 47.5 ng/mL. The intra-assay (within person) coefficient of variation (CV) was 8% while the inter-assay (between person) CV was 44%, demonstrating sufficient repeatability of the LC/MS measurements.

Statistical Analyses

Odds ratio (OR) estimates of the relative risk and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using logistic regression (conditional on year of birth, race and sex) to evaluate the association of 25(OH)D3 [categorical variable with cut points based on approximate quartiles of the 25(OH)D3 distribution among controls] with CBT (Stata, V.13.0, College Station, Texas). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was based on Wald tests of the 25(OH)D3 parameter estimates. Trends were assessed by examining p-values for the association of continuous 25(OH)D3 and CBT risk. Categorical variables for birth weight, gestational age, size for gestational age, maternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal education, maternal age at delivery and season of birth (determined from birth month) were evaluated as potential confounders. Potentially modifying effects of these variables on the 25(OH)D3 and CBT association were evaluated by conducting likelihood ratio tests on nested models containing main effect and cross-product terms for each variable. CBT subtype-specific analyses for the major histological categories (astrocytoma, ependymoma and PNET) and age at diagnosis (< 5 years of age and ≥5 years of age) were also conducted.

Results

From the prioritized roster of 374 case/control pairs, DBS for 65 case/control pairs were not searched for because the quota of 250 case/control pairs had been reached. DBS were not obtained for 59 case/control pairs because the DBS for either the matched case or control: 1) was collected more than 48 hours after delivery (50%); 2) could not be located in the archives (29%); 3) was not stored in the archives because the corresponding birth occurred at a military hospital (12%); or 4) was missing a collection date (9%). No significant differences in birth characteristics were found between the subjects for whom DBS were and were not obtained (results not shown). The DBS successfully located for 250 case/control pairs were delivered to the analysis laboratory; however, a handling error resulted in mislabelling of 3 samples, giving a final sample size of 247 case/control pairs.

Mothers of cases were generally younger at delivery and slightly less likely to have reported smoking during pregnancy than mothers of controls. Cases also tended to have higher birth weights and were less likely to be born in fall months than controls (Table 1). Mean (standard deviation) 25(OH)D3 in controls was 11.6 ng/mL (5.2) and in cases was 12.0 ng/mL (5.2). In the regression models, adjustment for potentially confounding variables had minimal impact on the 25(OH)D3 point estimates, so these variables were not included in the final analyses. There was little evidence of a significant overall association between CBT and circulating levels of neonatal 25(OH)D3 (Table 2), and no differences were observed when stratifying by sex, race, gestational age, maternal smoking, maternal age at delivery, season of birth, age at diagnosis and major histological type (results not shown). However, when stratifying by median birth weight among controls, significant effect modification was observed (p=0.04) (Table 3). Among cases and controls in the higher birth weight category (3458-4847 grams), ORs were increased in each of the three highest categories of neonatal 25(OH)D3, with evidence of a trend of increasing CBT risk with increasing levels of 25(OH)D3 (p=0.04). Among the lower birth weight category (1105-<3458 grams), no statistically significant effects were observed, though there was suggestion of a trend of decreasing CBT risk with increasing 25(OH)D3 (p=0.4). The mean level of 25(OH)D3 for the lower and higher categories of birth weight among controls was 12.3 and 11.0 ng/mL, respectively. While there was no statistically significant evidence for effect modification when stratifying by tertiles of birth weight and size for gestational age, the general patterns of reduced risks with increasing 25(OH)D3 among the lowest tertile and SGA categories and increased risks with increasing 25(OH)D3 in the highest tertile and LGA categories were apparent (results not shown).

Table 1.

Maternal and Infant Characteristics of Childhood Brain Tumor Cases and Matched Controls born in Washington State, 1991–2010

Cases
N (%)
Controls
N (%)
Maternal Characteristics
Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy
   No 214 (87) 198 (80)
   Yes 31 (13) 43 (17)
   Unknown 2 (<1) 6 (3)
Maternal Education
   0 – 11 45 (18) 50 (20)
   12 70 (28) 68 (28)
   >12 118 (48) 108 (44)
   Unknown 14 (6) 21 (8)
Maternal Age at Delivery
   <20 18 (7) 22 (9)
   20–24 69 (28) 50 (20)
   25–29 65 (26) 77 (31)
   30–34 53 (22) 61 (25)
   ≥35 42 (17) 37 (15)
Infant Characteristics
Birth year
   1991–1994 72 (29) 72 (29)
   1995–1999 94 (38) 94 (38)
   2000–2004 56 (23) 56 (23)
   2005–2010 25 (10) 25 (10)
Sex
   Male 120 (49) 120 (49)
   Female 127 (51) 127 (51)
Race
   White 184 (74) 184 (74)
   Black 9 (4) 9 (4)
   Asian 17 (7) 17 (7)
   Other 37 (15) 37 (15)
Birthweight (grams)
   1105–<3175 45 (18) 62 (25)
   3175–<3458 52 (21) 61 (25)
   3458–<3770 76 (31) 63 (25)
   3770–4847 74 (30) 61 (25)
Gestational Age (weeks)
   25–38 52 (21) 56 (23)
   39 65 (26) 68 (27)
   ≥40 129 (52) 123 (50)
   Unknown 1 (<1) 0 (0)
Size for Gestational Age
   Small 14 (6) 23 (9)
   Appropriate 194 (79) 197 (80)
   Large 38 (15) 27 (11)
   Unknown 1 (<1) 0 (0)
Season of birtha
   Winter 65 (26) 54 (22)
   Spring 61 (25) 67 (27)
   Summer 59 (24) 46 (19)
   Fall 62 (25) 80 (32)
Disease Characteristics
Age at CBT Diagnosis
   <5 123 (50)
   ≥5 124 (50)
Histological Type
   PNET 55 (22)
Ependymoma 22 (9)
   Astrocytoma 170 (69)
Aniplastic 2 (<1)
   Glioblastoma NOS 6 (2)
   Malignant Glioma 77 (31)
Fibrillary Astrocytoma 4 (2)
   Astrocytoma NOS 16 (7)
   Pleomorphic 6 (2)
Pilocytic 59 (24)
a

Winter = December, January, February; Spring = March, April, May; Summer = June, July, August; Fall = September, October, November

Table 2.

Vitamin D and Childhood Brain Tumor Risk

25(OH)D3
(ng/mL)
Cases
N (%)
Controls
N (%)
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
2.8 – 7.7 48 (19) 61 (25) 1.0 (Ref.)
7.7 – <11.0 65 (26) 61 (25) 1.3 (0.8–2.1)
11.0 – <14.7 71 (29) 63 (25) 1.4 (1.0–2.2)
14.7 – 37.0 63 (26) 62 (25) 1.3 (0.8–2.2)

Table 3.

Vitamin D and Childhood Brain Tumor Risk by Birth Weight

25(OH)D3
(ng/mL)
Birth weighta (grams)
1105 – <3458
3458 – 4847
Cases
N (%)
Controls
N (%)
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
Cases
N (%)
Controls
N (%)
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
2.8 – 7.7 25 (26) 24 (20) 1.0 (Ref.) 23 (15) 37 (30) 1.0 (Ref.)
7.7 – <11.0 27 (28) 30 (24) 0.9 (0.4–1.9) 38 (25) 31 (25) 1.7 (1.0–3.3)
11.0 – <14.7 21 (22) 31 (25) 0.7 (0.3–1.4) 50 (33) 32 (26) 2.4 (1.2–4.8)
14.7 – 37.0 24 (25) 38 (31) 0.6 (0.3–1.3) 39 (26) 24 (19) 2.6 (1.2–5.6)
*

Likelihood ratio test for modification of 25(OH)D3 association with CBT by birth weight, p = 0.04

a

Birth weight stratified at median among controls

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to consider the impact of early life vitamin D on CBT risk. In exploratory analyses, we observed a differential effect of 25(OH)D3 on CBT risk by birth weight. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed significantly increased risks of CBT with increased levels of neonatal 25(OH)D3 among children in the higher birth weight category. There was suggestive evidence of the expected protective effect of 25(OH)D3 on CBT risk among children in the lower birth weight category.

The observed impact of birth weight may be related to the insulin-like growth factor pathway, which plays a critical role in fetal development, including promoting the proliferation of brain cells10. Increased levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and its primary binding protein, IGFBP-3, have been associated with increased cancer risk in adults11. Although neonatal levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 have not been evaluated in association with childhood cancer risk, greater levels of IGF-1 are thought to be responsible for the observed associations between higher birth weight and increased childhood cancer risk12. Several studies have demonstrated correlations between circulating levels of vitamin D and IGF-1 in adults1316, and vitamin D supplementation has been observed to increase IGF-1 levels in children17,18. Thus, among higher birth weight children, there may be a higher background level of IGF-1 to which increased vitamin D may further contribute, causing IGF-1 levels to surpass a threshold that leads to an increased CBT risk. Among lower birth weights, the contribution of vitamin D to IGF-1 levels may be less critical given that background levels of IGF-1 are likely to be lower. In these circumstances, the anti-cancer effects of vitamin D, such as transcriptional activation of genes that block cell cycle progression19, may predominate.

25(OH)D3 levels in our study were generally comparable to those observed in other neonatal populations20,21, though average levels were well below the level of 20ng/mL recommended for children by the American Academy of Paediatrics. In fact, for children of higher birth weights, increased ORs for CBT were observed at 25(OH)D3 levels that were below this limit. Neonatal DBS are collected shortly after birth, so 25(OH)D3 levels in the DBS are likely to reflect in utero levels towards the end of pregnancy and, as such, may not be representative of other gestational time periods. Although we did not have data on 25(OH)D3 levels during early pregnancy or for other time points during childhood, in terms of CBT risk, 25(OH)D3 levels during the end of pregnancy may be particularly important since rapid brain development occurs during this time period22.

Given the small sample size, power to detect effect modification or to identify subtype-specific associations was limited; true differences by these factors may have been missed. Among controls, there was indication of increasing 25(OH)D3 with more recent birth years [e.g. mean 25(OH)D3 from 1991 – 1999 and 2000 – 2010 was 11.1 ng/mL and 12.8 ng/mL, respectively]. This may indicate degradation of 25(OH)D3 in DBS over time, but this was not observed in a previous study evaluating the validity of 25(OH)D3 measurements in similarly archived DBS23. Behavioral changes over time, such as increased use of nutritional supplements among pregnant women, may also account for the observed differences in 25(OH)D3. Since cases and controls were matched on year of birth, any systemic differences in 25(OH)D3 by year of birth were unlikely to bias our results. Strengths of the study include population-based identification of cases and controls and use of population-based pre-diagnostic specimens with which we were able to generate quantitative measurements of 25(OH)D3.

Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy is receiving increased attention, and has been associated with important complications including gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia24, suggesting the need for supplementation. The role of vitamin D, however, is complex, and our results, which should be confirmed in future large-scale studies that also can assess the potential role of IGF-1 to help elucidate possible underlying mechanisms, suggest that it may be difficult to predict the potential impact of vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women.

Novelty and Impact Statement.

This is one of the first evaluations of neonatal circulating levels of vitamin D in association with childhood brain tumor risk. Results warrant additional studies with a detailed examination of the role of birth weight and the potential impact of insulin-like growth factor 1.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grant R03CA165071, National Cancer Institute, and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

References

  • 1.Giovannucci E. Vitamin D and cancer incidence in the Harvard cohorts. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ko P, Burkert R, McGrath J, Eyles D. Maternal vitamin D3 deprivation and the regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle during rat brain development. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2004;153:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McGrath JJ, Feron FP, Burne TH, Mackay-Sim A, Eyles DW. Vitamin D3-implications for brain development. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004:89–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.070. 557-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee JM, Smith JR, Philipp BL, Chen TC, Mathieu J, Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency in a healthy group of mothers and newborn infants. Clin Pediatr Phila. 2007;46:42–44. doi: 10.1177/0009922806289311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johnson DD, Wagner CL, Hulsey TC, McNeil RB, Ebeling M, Hollis BW. Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency is Common during Pregnancy. Am J Perinatol [Internet] 2010 doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262505. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20640974. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Searles Nielsen S, Mueller BA, De Roos AJ, Checkoway H. Newborn screening archives as a specimen source for epidemiologic studies: feasibility and potential for bias. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Newman MS, Brandon TR, Groves MN, Gregory WL, Kapur S, Zava DT. A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of 25-hydroxy vitamin d(2) and 25-hydroxy vitamin d(3) in dried blood spots: a potential adjunct to diabetes and cardiometabolic risk screening. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3:156–162. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Larkin EK, Gebretsadik T, Koestner N, Newman MS, Liu Z, Carroll KN, Minton P, Woodward K, Hartert TV. Agreement of blood spot card measurements of vitamin d levels with serum, whole blood specimen types and a dietary recall instrument. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hornung R, Reed L. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Env Hyg. 1990;5:46–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Netchine I, Azzi S, Le Bouc Y, Savage MO. IGF1 molecular anomalies demonstrate its critical role in fetal, postnatal growth and brain development. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25:181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Renehan AG, Zwahlen M, Minder C, O’Dwyer ST, Shalet SM, Egger M. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. The Lancet. 2004;363:1346–1353. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bjørge T, Sørensen HT, Grotmol T, Engeland A, Stephansson O, Gissler M, Tretli S, Troisi R. Fetal growth and childhood cancer: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e1265–e1275. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gómez JM, Maravall FJ, Gómez N, Navarro MA, Casamitjana R, Soler J. Relationship between 25-(OH) D3, the IGF-I system, leptin, anthropometric and body composition variables in a healthy, randomly selected population. Horm Metab Res Horm Stoffwechselforschung Horm Métabolisme. 2004;36:48–53. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Forouhi NG, Luan J, Cooper A, Boucher BJ, Wareham NJ. Baseline serum 25-hydroxy vitamin d is predictive of future glycemic status and insulin resistance: the Medical Research Council Ely Prospective Study 1990 – 2000. Diabetes. 2008;57:2619–2625. doi: 10.2337/db08-0593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bogazzi F, Rossi G, Lombardi M, Tomisti L, Sardella C, Manetti L, Curzio O, Marcocci C, Grasso L, Gasperi M, Martino E. Vitamin D status may contribute to serum insulin-like growth factor I concentrations in healthy subjects. J Endocrinol Invest. 2011;34:e200–e203. doi: 10.3275/7228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hyppönen E, Boucher BJ, Berry DJ, Power C. 25-hydroxyvitamin D, IGF-1, and metabolic syndrome at 45 years of age: a cross-sectional study in the 1958 British Birth Cohort. Diabetes. 2008;57:298–305. doi: 10.2337/db07-1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bereket A, Cesur Y, Özkan B, Adal E, Turan S, Onan SH, Döneray H, Akçay T, Haklar G. Circulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) is not regulated by parathyroid hormone and vitamin D in vivo: evidence from children with rickets. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2010;2:17–20. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.v2i1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Soliman AT, Al Khalaf F, Alhemaidi N, Al Ali M, Al Zyoud M, Yakoot K. Linear growth in relation to the circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I, parathyroid hormone, and 25-hydroxy vitamin D in children with nutritional rickets before and after treatment: endocrine adaptation to vitamin D deficiency. Metabolism. 2008;57:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Deeb KK, Trump DL, Johnson CS. Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:684–700. doi: 10.1038/nrc2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McGrath JJ, Eyles DW, Pedersen CB, et al. Neonatal vitamin d status and risk of schizophrenia: A population-based case-control study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:889–894. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karras SN, Shah I, Petroczi A, Goulis DG, Bili H, Papadopoulou F, Harizopoulou V, Tarlatzis BC, Naughton DP. An observational study reveals that neonatal vitamin D is primarily determined by maternal contributions: implications of a new assay on the roles of vitamin D forms. Nutr J. 2013;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Limperopoulos C, Soul JS, Gauvreau K, Huppi PS, Warfield SK, Bassan H, Robertson RL, Volpe JJ, du Plessis AJ. Late gestation cerebellar growth is rapid and impeded by premature birth. Pediatrics. 2005;115:688–695. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eyles D, Anderson C, Ko P, Jones A, Thomas A, Burne T, Mortensen PB, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Hougaard DM, McGrath J. A sensitive LC/MS/MS assay of 25OH vitamin D3 and 25OH vitamin D2 in dried blood spots. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;403:145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weinert LS, Silveiro SP. Maternal-Fetal Impact of Vitamin D Deficiency: A Critical Review. Matern Child Health J. 2014 doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1499-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES