Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastroenterology logoLink to World Journal of Gastroenterology
. 2005 Nov 14;11(42):6613–6619. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i42.6613

Modulation of gene expression in MHCC97 cells by interferon alpha

Wei-Zhong Wu 1, Hui-Chuan Sun 1, Lu Wang 1, Jie Chen 1, Kang-Da Liu 1, Zhao-You Tang 1
PMCID: PMC4355753  PMID: 16425353

Abstract

AIM: To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the inhibitory effects of IFN-α on tumor growth and metastasis in MHCC97 xenografts.

METHODS: Three thousand international units per milliliter of IFN-α-treated and -untreated MHCC97 cells were enrolled for gene expression analysis using cDNA microarray. The mRNA levels of several differentially expressed genes in cDNA microarray were further identified by Northern blot and RT-PCR.

RESULTS: A total of 190 differentially expressed genes including 151 IFN-α-repressed and 39 -stimulated genes or expressed sequence tags from 8 464 known human genes were found to be regulated by IFN-α in MHCC97. With a few exceptions, mRNA levels of the selected genes in RT-PCR and Northern blot were in good agreement with those in cDNA microarray.

CONCLUSION: IFN-α might exert its complicated anti-tumor effects on MHCC97 xenografts by regulating the expression of functional genes involved in cell metabolism, proliferation, morphogenesis, angiogenesis, and signaling.

Keywords: Interferon α, cDNA microarray, Gene expression profile, HCC

INTRODUCTION

Human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in China. Patients with HCC often die of tumor metastasis and recurrence even after curative resection. Recently, a metastatic human HCC model in nude mice (LCI-D20) and a series of HCC cell lines (MHCC97, MHCC97-H, MHCC97-L) with different metastatic potentials derived from LCI-D20 have been established in our institute[1,2]. Using this model, IFN-α significantly inhibits tumor growth and metastasis of MHCC97 xenografts has been found[3-5]. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are still unclear.

IFN-α is a multifunctional cytokine capable of inter-fering with viral infection, inhibiting cell proliferation, regulating cell differentiation, as well as modulating immune response[6-9]. It is well known that these pleiotropic effects of IFN-α are mediated primarily through the tran-scriptional regulation of many different functional genes. Thanks to the rapid progress in human genetic projects; many functional human genes and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) are identified and released, which make us possible to use cDNA microarray to survey IFN-α-modulated genes in MHCC97 cells. In this study, we identified 190 differentially expressed genes from 8 464 known human genes, which might mediate various biological functions of IFN-α. These data provide us useful clues for further studying the anti-tumor mechanisms of IFN-α and finding the IFN-α mimics for HCC therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture

MHCC97, a metastatic HCC cell line derived from LCI-D20 xenografts, was cultured in high glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco-BRL, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Hyclone, UT, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin in 20-cm2 tissue culture flasks. Cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 50 mL/L CO2 and passaged every 3 d.

cDNA microarray analysis

A total of 8 464 cDNAs of known human genes (United Gene Holding, Ltd, Shanghai) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using universal primers and spotted onto silylated slides (CEL Associates, Houston, TX, USA) using a Cartesian PixSys 7500 motion control robot (Cartesian Tech, Irvine, CA, USA) fitted with ChipMaker micro-spotting technology (TeleChem, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). After being hydrated, dried, cross linked and washed, the microarray was ready for use. Total RNA was isolated from IFN-α-treated and untreated (3 000 IU/mL, 16 h) cells using TRIzol (Gibco-BRL). cDNA probes were prepared by reverse transcription and purified according to the methods described by Schena et al[10]. Then equal amount of cDNA from IFN-α-untreated and treated MHCC97 cells was labeled with Cy3-dUTP and Cy5-dUTP, respectively. The mixed Cy3/Cy5 probes were purified and dissolved in 20 μL of hybridization solution (0.75 mol/L NaCl, 0.075 mol/L sodium citrate, 0.4% SDS, 50% formamide, 0.1% Ficoll, 0.1% polyvinylpyrrolidone and 0.1% BSA). Microarrays were pre-hybridized with 0.5 mg/mL salmon sperm DNA at 42 °C for 6 h. After being extensively washed, the denatured (95 °C, 5 min) fluorescent-labeled probe mixture was applied onto the pre-hybridized chips and further hybridized at 42 °C for 15-17 h under a cover glass. Subsequently, chips were sequentially washed for 10 min at 60 °C with 2×SSC+0.2% SDS, 0.1×SSC+0.2% SDS and 0.1×SSC solutions and dried at room temperature (1×SSC: 150 mmol/L NaCl, 15 mmol/L sodium citrate). Both Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescent signals of hybridized chips were scanned by ScanArray 4000 (GSI Lumonics, MA, USA) and analyzed using Genepix Pro 3.0 software (BioDiscovery Inc., CA, USA). To minimize artifacts arising from low expression, only genes whose Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescent intensities were both over 200 counts, or genes whose Cy3 or Cy5 fluorescent intensity was over 800 were selected for calculating the normalization cofactor (ln(Cy5/Cy3)). Genes were identified as differentially expressed, if the ratio of Cy5/(Cy3×normalization cofactor) (Cy5/Cy3*) was more than 2 or less than 0.5.

Reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction

MHCC97 cells (106) cultured in 20-cm2 flasks were treated with 3 000 IU/mL IFN-α (Roche, Shanghai) for 0 or 16 h, and total RNA was extracted (RNeasy Mini Kit, QIAGEN Inc., CA, USA). One microgram RNA was used to set-up reverse transcription reactions (Gibco-BRL, NY, USA). Nine differentially expressed genes identified by cDNA microarray were selected for analysis by semi-quantitative PCR. Appropriate primers were designed using Primer3 software (http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu). γ-Actin was used as an internal standard. PCR reaction conditions and primer sequences are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primer sequence and condition for PCR analysis of selected genes

Category Gene Sense and antisense primers Annealing (°C) Cycles Size (bp)
Cytoskeletal gene Neutral calponin 5’-TGGCACCAGCTAGAAAACCT-3’; 5’-CAGGGACATGGAGGAGTTGT-3’ 56 26 498
Proliferative gene hMCM2 5’-ACCGAGACAATGACCTACGG-3’; 5’-CTAGCTGTCTGCCCCTTGTC-3’ 56 30 382
Angiogenic gene VEGF165 receptor 5’-GAAGCACCGAGAGAACAAGG-3; 5’-CACCTGTGAGCTGGAAGTCA-3’ 56 30 359
IFN-α-induced genes 9-27 5’-TTGGTCCCTGGCTAATTCAC-3’; 5’-ATGAGGATGCCCAGAATCAG-3’ 53 35 491
ISG-56 ku 5’-AAAAGCCCACATTTGAGGTG-3’; 5’-GGCTGATATCTGGGTGCCTA-3’ 54 30 451
MAPK pathway-related genes ERK activator kinase (MEK2) 5’-CGAAAGGATCTCAGAGCTGG-3’; 5’-GTGCTTCTCTCGGAGGTACG-3’ 56 26 349
G3BP2 5’-GCAGAACCTGTTTCTCTGCC-3’; 5’-CACCACCACCTCTGGTTTCT-3’ 56 30 475
CHED 5’-TCCTTGGCGAACTCTTCACT-3’; 5’-TGCCATAAAGGGAGATCTGG-3’ 56 30 336
cAMP/PI3 pathway-related gene Adenylyl cyclase 5’-CCAGGAGCCTGAAGAATGAG-3’; 5’-GGCTTCTGAGCTCCAATCAC-3’ 53 35 439
Housekeeping gene γ-Actin 5’-ATGGAAGAAGAAATCGCCGC-3’; 5’-ACACGCAGCTCGTTGTAGAA-3’ 55 25 287

Northern blot analysis

Total RNA of 3 000 IU/mL IFN-α-treated or untreated MHCC97 cells was isolated as described above. Thirty microgram was separated by 1% agarose formaldehyde gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nylon membrane (Millipore, MA, USA) in 10×SSC by capillary blotting. The membrane was hybridized with the appropriate cDNA probe prepared from the human library of cDNA clones (Biostar Genechip Inc., Shanghai) and labeled with [α-32P]dCTP (Yahui Biomedical, Beijing) using random primer (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA).

RESULTS

Gene expression profile identified by cDNA microarray

It is well known that the gene expression pattern of cells often varies with time and differentiation status and that cells derived from different individuals often have different genetic expression profiles. As a result, it is often difficult to extract useful information on the possible causes of phenotypic differences by comparing the genetic expression profiles of different cell lines. To minimize such complicated factors, we compared the gene expression profiles in 3 000 IU/mL IFN-α-treated and untreated (0 IU/mL) MHCC97 cells in two independent cDNA microarray analyses. We reasoned that such an internally consistent comparison might provide useful information on explaining the anti-tumor molecular mechanism of IFN-α in MHCC97 xenografts.

In 8 464 tested genes and ESTs, 190 genes were ide-ntified to be modulated by 3 000 IU/mL IFN-α treatment in MHCC97 cells. Among them the ex-pression of 151 genes was downregulated by IFN-α and the expression of 39 genes was upregulated by IFN-α. All differentially expressed genes are listed in Table 2 and the gene expression profiles obtained by cDNA microarray analysis are shown in Figure 1.

Table 2.

Gene expression profile of MHCC97 cells induced by IFN-α

Category GenBank ID Gene description Cy5/Cy3* (average)
2.1 Metabolism related genes HUMCRTR Creatine transporter 0.251
HSGAGMR GARs-AIRs-GART 0.289
HUM2OGDH 2-Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase 0.298
AF034544 Delta7-sterol reductase 0.318
HUMTK Thymidine kinase 0.333
HSU12778 Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase 0.341
HUMTHBP Thyroid hormone-binding protein(p55) 0.349
AF067127 7-Dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR) 0.356
HSPRCOX Pristanoyl-CoA oxidase 0.364
AF035429 Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 0.372
AF070544 Glucose transporter glycoprotein (SGLT) 0.379
HSPFKLA Liver-type1-phosphofructokianse (PFKL) 0.392
HUMSHMT Serine hydroxymethyltransferase 2 (SHMT2) 0.407
HUMMGPHB Brain glycogen phosphorylase 0.413
HUMTCBA Cytosolic thyroid hormone-binding protein (p58) 0.415
D88152 Acetyl-coenzyme A transporter 0.451
HUMPKM2L M2-type pyruvate kinase 0.456
HSLDHBR Lactate dehydrogenase B 2.156
AF108211 Inorganic pyrophosphatase 2.25
HSCOXVII Cytochrome C oxidase VII 2.279
HUMCYCPSK Cytochrome C (HS7) 2.574
HUMDBI Diazepam binding inhibitor 2.628
2.2 Proliferation, apoptosis and damaged DNA repairing related genes HSATPBR Na/K ATPase beta subunit 0.208
HUMP53T Mutant p53 protein 0.233
HSMITG Mitochondrial DNA 0.309
HSNUMAMR Nuclear mitotic apparatus protein 0.325
HSDNALIG3 DNA ligase III 0.34
G28520 STS HSGC-31478 (homolog to Rad23a) 0.341
AF096870 Estrogen-responsive B box protein 0.352
AF001609 EXT like protein 3 0.367
AF015283 Selenoprotein W 0.369
AF011905 Putative checkpoint control protein hRad1 0.398
HUMHMAM2 Minichromosome maintenance 2 0.408
HUMRNAPII RNA polymerase II 23 ku subunit 0.408
AF007790 Inversely correlated with estrogen receptor Expression (ICERE-1) 0.413
HSU78310 Pescadillo 0.43
AF004162 Nickel-specific induction protein (Cap43) 0.434
HSU3298 UV-damaged DNA binding factor 0.437
HUMP1CDC47 P1cdc47 0.442
HSU72649 B cell translocation gene 2 0.444
AF031523 bcl-xL/bcl-2 associated death promoter (BAD) 0.481
AF132973 CGI-39 (homolog to GRIM-19) 2.079
2.3 Morphogenesis, adhesion, and cytoskeleton D38735 Neutral calponin 0.141
AF006082 Actin-related protein Arp2 0.197
U01244 Fibulin 1D 0.212
remodeling related genes AF070593 Beta tublin 0.236
HSU35622 EWS-E1A-F chimeric protein 0.255
AF049259 Keratin 13 0.335
HSPRO4HY Prolyl 4-hydoxylase beta 0.337
HUMCN4GEL Collagenase type IV 0.36
AF005654 Actin-binding double zinc-finger protein 0.378
HSTEST Testican 0.379
HUMEPSURAN Surface antigen 0.389
AF004841 CAM-related/down-regulated by oncogenes 0.398
HUMGLBA Co-beta-glucosidase 0.402
HUMCA1XIA Alpha-1 type XI collagen 0.423
HUMMCPGV Macrophage capping protein 0.461
HUMNID Nidogen 0.497
HSTUMP Translationally controlled tumor protein 2.022
2.4 Signal transmitting related genes HUMEPHT2R Protein tyrosine kinase (NET PTK) 0.248
HUMMEK2NF ERK activator kinase (MEK2) 0.271
HUMBADPTA Beta-adaptin 0.273
HUMP2A Alpha-PR65 0.282
HUMHRGAA rab GDI alpha 0.285
AF053535 ras-GAP/RNA binding protein G3BP2 0.296
HSRING3GE RING 3 0.316
HSU45973 Pt Ins (4,5) P(2) 5-phosphatase 0.324
HSU07139 Voltage-gated calcium channel beta 0.329
HUMFTPB Farnesyl-protein transferase beta 0.345
HSU33053 Lipid-activated protein kinase (PRK1) 0.352
HUMHK1A Calcium-ATPase (HK1) 0.386
HSU66406 EPH-related PTK receptor ligand LERK-8 0.386
HSPP15 Placental protein 15 0.387
HSADCYCL Adenylyl cyclase 0.409
HUMCHED cdc2-related protein kinase (CHED) 0.412
AF093265 Homer 3 0.415
HSU40282 Integrin-linked kinase 0.416
HUMGKAS Stimulatory G protein 0.416
HSU43939 Nuclear transport factor 2 0.429
HUMCAK Tyrosine protein kinase (CAK) 0.439
HUMGNOS48 Endothelial nitric oxide synthase 0.443
HUMCDPKIV Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV 0.449
HSPKX1MR Protein kinase, PKX1 0.469
D83760 Mother against dpp (Mad) related protein 0.472
HUMEGFGRBA EGF receptor binding protein GRB2 0.481
HSU51004 Protein kinase C inhibitor (PKCI-1) 2.223
2.5 Tumor angiogenesis related genes HUMRNAMBPE Golli-mbp 0.236
AF016050 VEGF 165 receptor/neuropilin 0.25
AF001307 Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 0.27
HSU64791 Golgi membrane sialoglycoprotein MG 160 0.355
HUMPTPRZ Protein tyrosine phosphatase Zeta-polypeptide 0.363
HSU28811 Cysteine-rich FGFR (CFR1) 0.414
HSU20758 Osteopontin 2.193
HUMTR107 DNA-binding protein, TAXREB107 2.24
HUMNEPPON Nephropontin 2.413
2.6 Transcriptional activity related genes S66431 Retinoblastoma binding protein 2 0.182
HUMANT61K Medium antigen-associated 61 ku protein 0.183
HSU58197 Interleukin enhancer binging factor 2 0.226
HSUBP Upstream binding factor 0.266
4758315 ets-related molecule, ETV5 0.267
AF099013 Glucocorticoid modulatory element binding protein 1 0.309
HSU72621 Lost on transformation 1(LOT1) 0.313
HUMFOS Oncogene protein, c-fos 0.361
AB019524 Nuclear receptor co-repressor 0.369
HS14AGGRE Conserved gene telomeric to alpha globin cluster 0.398
HSU74667 tat interactive protein (tip60) 0.404
AF114816 KRAB-zinc finger protein SZF1-1 0.406
HSU80456 Drosophila single-minded, SIM2 0.409
AF117756 TRAP 150 0.41
HSU15306 Cysteine rich DNA binding protein NFX1 0.417
S57153 Retinoblastoma binding protein 1 0.469
HUM56KDAPR IEF SSP 9502 2.183
HUMTR107 DNA binding protein. TAXREB 107 2.24
HUMMSS1 Mammalian suppressor of sgv 1, MSS 1 2.313
2.7 mRNA and protein processing, secretory, proteolysis related genes HSU39412 Alpha SNAP 0.141
HSU47927 Isopeptidase T (ISOT) 0.229
HSU72355 hsp27 ERE-TATA bind protein, HET 0.231
AF077039 TIM17 homolog 0.238
HUMHRH1 RNA helicase, HRH1 0.251
AF206402 U5 SnRNP 100 ku protein 0.255
D85429 Heat shock protein 40 0.344
HSU85946 hSec 10p 0.378
HSY10806 Arginine methyltransferase 0.412
AB002135 Glycophosphatidylinositol anchor attachment 1 0.428
AB007510 PRP8 protein 0.436
HSU24105 Coatomer protein (COPA) 0.455
HSCANPX Calpain-like protease (CANPX) 0.456
HSRBPRL7A Ribosomal protein L7 2.067
D89678 A+U-rich element RNA-binding protein 2.069
HSU14966 Ribosomal protein L5 2.113
HSRPL31 Ribosomal protein L31 2.142
HUMPSC9 Proteasome subunit HC9 2.179
HSU26312 Heterochromatin protein HP1 HS-gamma 2.182
HUMRPS7A Ribosomal protein S7 2.289
AF106622 TIM17a 2.312
HSUCEH3 Ubiquitin-conjugated enzyme UbCH2 2.323
HUMRPS7A Ribosomal protein S7 2.289
AF106622 TIM17a 2.312
HSUCEH3 Ubiquitin-conjugated enzyme UbCH2 2.323
HUMRPS25 Ribosomal protein S25 2.326
HUMRPSA3A Ribosomal protein S3a 2.328
HSRNASMG Sm protein G 2.334
HUMRPS18 Ribosomal protein S18 2.341
HUMRP4SX Ribosomal protein S4 isoform 2.346
HUMPSC3 Proteasome subunit HC3 2.368
HUMTCP20 Chaperonin protein, TCP20 2.572
4504522 Chaperonin protein, hsp10 2.686
2.8 Tumor antigen processing, anti-viral infection related genes HUMSAPC1 Cerebroside sulfate activator protein 0.211
AF077011 Interleukin 16 0.23
AF057307 Prosaposin 0.26
HUMSIATA Sialyltransferase 0.26
AF055008 Epithelin 1 and 2 0.363
HSU58766 FX protein 0.393
HUMOSF1 OSF1 0.407
HSU46194 RAGE 4 0.43
HSU18121 136 ku double-stranded RNA binding protein 0.469
AF021315 Reverse transcriptase 0.483
S74095 Preproenkephalin A 2.115
HUM927A Interferon inducible protein 9-27 2.356
HSIFI56R Interferon inducible protein 56 ku 3.829
HUMHCAMAP1 Interferon inducible protein 44 ku 4.03
2.9 Genes with unknown biological functions D50928 KIAA0138 0.23
AF132942 CGI08 0.269
AB020677 KIAA0870 0.271
AB011110 KIAA0538 0.277
AB028956 KIAA1033 0.28
HSU10362 GB36b glycoprotein 0.335
4579277 A homolog of proteasome regulatory S2 0.352
AB002356 KIAA0358 0.371
4505130 A homolog of MCM3 0.371
AB029020 KIAA1097 0.381
HS130N43 0.383
HSU66406 Eplg8 0.386
HSNIPSNA1 NIPSNAP1 protein 0.391
AB002378 KIAA0380 0.405
HSU90907 Regulatory subunit of P55 PIK 0.407
AB208959 KIAA1036 0.414
AB020658 KIAA0851 0.416
AF035282 0.416
AF000136 0.419
HUMORFFA KIAA0120 0.424
D13699 KIAA0019 0.43
HUMORFB1 KIAA0123 0.432
AF151830 CGI72 0.436
AB007900 KIAA0440 0.437
AB014595 KIAA0695 0.439
HSM800064 0.439
HUMORFA04 KIAA0115 0.457
HSU79287 0.462
AF007149 0.473
AF007135 2.147
AF151875 CGI117 2.184
AF151857 CGI99 2.326
HUMRSC508 KIAA0020 2.45

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative hybrid result (A) and scatter plots (B) of cDNA microarray analysis in IFN-α treated MHCC97.

Nine differentially expressed genes evaluated by RT-PCR and Northern blot

To validate the results of cDNA microarray, we selected nine genes whose expressions were clearly altered by IFN-α and evaluated their expressions by PCR and Northern blot. We enrolled IFN-α-regulated genes and found that the results were consistent with the previous reports[11,12].

For PCR analysis, we synthesized primers as indicated in Table 1 and performed semi-quantitative RT-PCR as outlined under “Materials and methods” after treatment of MHCC97 cells with 3 000 IU/mL IFN-α for 0 or 16 h. The transcription patterns of the same genes were also analyzed by Northern blot. Among the nine selected genes, seven downregulated genes were proved by cDNA microarray, six by RT-PCR and five by Northern blot analysis. Two stimulated genes, ISG-56 ku and 9-27 were proved by cDNA microarray, RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis. ERK activator kinase (MEK2), one repressed gene in cDNA microarray, was not changed in RT-PCR or Northern blot analysis. Thus, with a few exceptions, the results of RT-PCR and Northern blot were in good agreement with those of cDNA microarray analysis (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Confirmation of gene expression profiles in cDNA microarray analysis with RT-PCR and Northern blot.

DISCUSSION

cDNA microarray is a useful technique for rapid screening of gene expressions in cells, although the results need to be further confirmed by other molecular methods. Using this method, we found 211 hybrid dots, whose Cy5/Cy3* ratio was either more than 2 or less than 0.5 in IFN-α-treated MHCC97. Blasting the cDNA sequences in public database showed that these dots represented 190 different human genes or ESTs due to the redundant hybrids. Based on the results of RT-PCR and Northern blot, we believe that our cDNA microarray data are reliable. These differentially expressed genes might mediate the multiple biological functions of IFN-α directly or indirectly in MHCC97. We have artificially categorized these genes into nine functional clusters (Table 2).

IFN-α might interfere with cellular metabolisms by downregulating metabolic gene expression. In detail, IFN-α can inhibit glycolysis, glycogen degradation, gluconeogenesis as well as creatine or glucose tran-sportation by repressing the expressions of liver-type phosphofructokinase (hPFKL), M2-type pyruvate kinase, brain glycogen phosphorylase, 2-oxoglutarate de-hydrogenase, glucose transporter glycoprotein (SGLT) and cytosolic thyroid hormone-binding protein[13]. IFN-α can also inhibit lipolysis by reducing the expression of delta7-sterol reductase and pristanoyl-CoA oxidase, two key enzymes in lipid metabolism[14,15]. In addition, IFN-α reduces purine and pyridine biosynthesis by repressing the expression of GARs-AIRs-GART and serine hydro-xymethyltransferase 2 (SHMT2). All these indicate that IFN-α-treated MHCC97 can result in lower ATP production and DNA synthesis, and slow down cell proliferation.

Many proliferation-, apoptosis- and cell cycle-regulating genes are modulated by IFN-α in MHCC97. Downregulating the expression of mutant p53, mito-chondrial DNA, nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA), and RNA polymerase II 23 ku subunit (polR2) might cause cell cycle arrest[16,17]. Downregulating the expression of DNA ligase III, hRad1, minichromosome maintenance 2 (hMCM2) as well as UV-damaged DNA binding factor might hinder damaged DNA repairing[18,19]. Stimulating retinoid-IFN-induced mortality 19 (GRIM-19) expression might promote IFN-α-induced apoptosis[20].

Several genes functionally related to cell morphogenesis, adhesion, and cytoskeleton remodeling are also modulated by IFN-α in MHCC97. For example, decreasing the expression of calponin, actin-related protein 2 (Arp2), fibulin 1D, beta-tublin and epidermal surface antigen (ESA), etc., might damage mitotic spindle formation and might interfere with actin-based cell motility, migration, adhesion and morphogenesis[21-24]. Reducing the expression of prolyl 4-hydroxylase beta, a key enzyme in collagen biosynthesis and type IV collagenase, a tumor-derived extracellular matrix metalloproteases might block tumor invasion and metastasis. Although most genes in this category were first identified as IFN-α regulating genes, their roles in mediating IFN-α functions need to be further studied.

In this study, we found that many genes functionally related to signal transmitting were affected by IFN-α in MHCC97. By repressing the expressions of discoidin domain receptor, integrin-linked kinase, EPH-related tyrosine kinase (EPT2) and MEK2, etc., IFN-α might block cellular signaling initiated by tyrosine-kinase receptors[25,26]. By modulating the expressions of Rab GDI, Ras-related GTP-binding proteins and farnesyl-protein transferase and nuclear transport factor (NTF2) and G3BP2, a Ras-GAP/RNA binding protein, IFN-α might interfere with GTP/GDP exchange and nuclear import, thus influencing the recycles and activities of ras and its homologs[27-29]. By attenuating the expressions of adenylyl cyclase (AC) and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase (PtdIns (4,5)P(2)5- phospharase), a catalyzer of pho-sphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and PRK1, IFN-α might decrease inositol polyphosphate levels in cytosol and might inhibit the serine/threonine-kinase activities through cAMP/ PI3P signal pathway[30,31]. All these changes might exert inhibitory effects of IFN-α on MAPK and PI3K signaling. In addition, other signaling pathways such as Ca(2+), NO and TGFβ/hMAD-dependent signaling pathways are suppressed by IFN-α as well[32,33]. Plausibly Jak/STATs pathway, the most important IFN-α signaling pathway, is confirmed not to be regulated in IFN-α-treated MHCC97. The deficient expression of p48 (ISGF3γ) in this cell line may be the possible mechanism for the non-response of IFN-α priming via Jak/STATs pathway (data not shown).

In this study, we found that many angiogenic-related genes were regulated by IFN-α. By attenuating the expressions of Golli-MBP[34], VEGF 165 receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT)[35] as well as Golgi membrane sialoglycoprotein MG 160, a bFGF binding protein and cysteine-rich FGF receptor (CFR-1)[36], IFN-α may destroy the balance between pro- and anti-angiogenic factors and exert its inhibitory effects on tumor angiogenesis.

It is well known that cells usually respond to various stimuli by rapidly shifting the functions of transcriptional factors. Using this strategy, IFN-α might impose its anti-proliferative functions and hormone response by fluctuating the expression of several transcriptional factors or their cofactors such as retinoblastoma binding protein2 (RBP2), interleukin enhancer binding factor 2, lost on transformation 1 (LOT1) and KRAB-zinc finger protein (SZF1)[37-40].

In addition, IFN-α might hinder with mRNA/rRNA spicing and maturation by downregulating RNA helicase (HRH1), U5 snRNP[41] and affect protein transportation, secretion and proteolysis by downregulating alpha SNAP, GPAA1, hSec10p, hsp40 and isopeptidase T, a putative molecular in ubiquitin–proteasome pathway[42-44]. Meanwhile IFN-α might evoke anti-viral or tumor immune response by upregulating 9-27, 56 ku protein and p44 expressions.

Except for functionally definite genes, many ESTs with unknown functions were identified as IFN-α-regulated genes in our study (Table 2). In conclusion, cDNA microarray is a useful, rapid method for screening transcriptome of cells and potentially paves a way for elucidating IFN-α effects on tumor growth and metastasis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Shanghai Biostar Genechip Inc. for cDNA microarray service.

Footnotes

Supported by the Key Projects for the Clinical Medicine from the Ministry of Public Health of China (2002–2005)

Science Editor Wang XL and Guo SY Language Editor Elsevier HK

References

  • 1.Sun FX, Tang ZY, Lui KD, Ye SL, Xue Q, Gao DM, Ma ZC. Establishment of a metastatic model of human hepatocellular carcinoma in nude mice via orthotopic implantation of histologically intact tissues. Int J Cancer. 1996;66:239–243. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960410)66:2<239::AID-IJC17>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tian J, Tang ZY, Ye SL, Liu YK, Lin ZY, Chen J, Xue Q. New human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line with highly metastatic potential (MHCC97) and its expressions of the factors associated with metastasis. Br J Cancer. 1999;81:814–821. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang L, Tang ZY, Qin LX, Wu XF, Sun HC, Xue Q, Ye SL. High-dose and long-term therapy with interferon-alfa inhibits tumor growth and recurrence in nude mice bearing human hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts with high metastatic potential. Hepatology. 2000;32:43–48. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.8525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wu WZ, Sun HC, Gao YQ, Li Y, Wang L, Zhou K, Liu KD, Iliakis G, Tang ZY. Reduction in p48-ISGFgamma levels confers resistance to interferon-alpha2a in MHCC97 cells. Oncology. 2004;67:428–440. doi: 10.1159/000082928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wu WZ, Sun HC, Shen YF, Chen J, Wang L, Tang ZY, Iliakis G, Liu KD. Interferon alpha 2a down-regulates VEGF expression through PI3 kinase and MAP kinase signaling pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005;131:169–178. doi: 10.1007/s00432-004-0615-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tough DF, Borrow P, Sprent J. Induction of bystander T cell proliferation by viruses and type I interferon in vivo. Science. 1996;272:1947–1950. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5270.1947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Albini A, Marchisone C, Del Grosso F, Benelli R, Masiello L, Tacchetti C, Bono M, Ferrantini M, Rozera C, Truini M, et al. Inhibition of angiogenesis and vascular tumor growth by interferon-producing cells: A gene therapy approach. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:1381–1393. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65007-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Slaton JW, Perrotte P, Inoue K, Dinney CP, Fidler IJ. Interferon-alpha-mediated down-regulation of angiogenesis-related genes and therapy of bladder cancer are dependent on optimization of biological dose and schedule. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:2726–2734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hong YK, Chung DS, Joe YA, Yang YJ, Kim KM, Park YS, Yung WK, Kang JK. Efficient inhibition of in vivo human malignant glioma growth and angiogenesis by interferon-beta treatment at early stage of tumor development. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:3354–3360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 1995;270:467–470. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Elco CP, Guenther JM, Williams BR, Sen GC. Analysis of genes induced by Sendai virus infection of mutant cell lines reveals essential roles of interferon regulatory factor 3, NF-kappaB, and interferon but not toll-like receptor 3. J Virol. 2005;79:3920–3929. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.7.3920-3929.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martensen PM, Justesen J. Small ISGs coming forward. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2004;24:1–19. doi: 10.1089/107999004772719864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ishikawa N, Oguri T, Isobe T, Fujitaka K, Kohno N. SGLT gene expression in primary lung cancers and their metastatic lesions. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001;92:874–879. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01175.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Witsch-Baumgartner M, Löffler J, Utermann G. Mutations in the human DHCR7 gene. Hum Mutat. 2001;17:172–182. doi: 10.1002/humu.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jia Y, Qi C, Zhang Z, Hashimoto T, Rao MS, Huyghe S, Suzuki Y, Van Veldhoven PP, Baes M, Reddy JK. Overexpression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha)-regulated genes in liver in the absence of peroxisome proliferation in mice deficient in both L- and D-forms of enoyl-CoA hydratase/dehydrogenase enzymes of peroxisomal beta-oxidation system. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:47232–47239. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306363200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang J, Silva JP, Gustafsson CM, Rustin P, Larsson NG. Increased in vivo apoptosis in cells lacking mitochondrial DNA gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4038–4043. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061038798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Taimen P, Viljamaa M, Kallajoki M. Preferential expression of NuMA in the nuclei of proliferating cells. Exp Cell Res. 2000;256:140–149. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.4799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maiorano D, Lemaître JM, Méchali M. Stepwise regulated chromatin assembly of MCM2-7 proteins. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:8426–8431. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.12.8426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brand M, Moggs JG, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Lejeune F, Dilworth FJ, Stevenin J, Almouzni G, Tora L. UV-damaged DNA-binding protein in the TFTC complex links DNA damage recognition to nucleosome acetylation. EMBO J. 2001;20:3187–3196. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.12.3187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chidambaram NV, Angell JE, Ling W, Hofmann ER, Kalvakolanu DV. Chromosomal localization of human GRIM-19, a novel IFN-beta and retinoic acid-activated regulator of cell death. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2000;20:661–665. doi: 10.1089/107999000414844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Curtis M, Nikolopoulos SN, Turner CE. Actopaxin is phosphorylated during mitosis and is a substrate for cyclin B1/cdc2 kinase. Biochem J. 2002;363:233–242. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3630233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kovacs EM, Goodwin M, Ali RG, Paterson AD, Yap AS. Cadherin-directed actin assembly: E-cadherin physically associates with the Arp2/3 complex to direct actin assembly in nascent adhesive contacts. Curr Biol. 2002;12:379–382. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00661-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Roof DJ, Hayes A, Adamian M, Chishti AH, Li T. Molecular characterization of abLIM, a novel actin-binding and double zinc finger protein. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:575–588. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.3.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bickel PE, Scherer PE, Schnitzer JE, Oh P, Lisanti MP, Lodish HF. Flotillin and epidermal surface antigen define a new family of caveolae-associated integral membrane proteins. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:13793–13802. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hannigan GE, Leung-Hagesteijn C, Fitz-Gibbon L, Coppolino MG, Radeva G, Filmus J, Bell JC, Dedhar S. Regulation of cell adhesion and anchorage-dependent growth by a new beta 1-integrin-linked protein kinase. Nature. 1996;379:91–96. doi: 10.1038/379091a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tang XX, Biegel JA, Nycum LM, Yoshioka A, Brodeur GM, Pleasure DE, Ikegaki N. cDNA cloning, molecular characterization, and chromosomal localization of NET(EPHT2), a human EPH-related receptor protein-tyrosine kinase gene preferentially expressed in brain. Genomics. 1995;29:426–437. doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.9985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ishizaki H, Miyoshi J, Kamiya H, Togawa A, Tanaka M, Sasaki T, Endo K, Mizoguchi A, Ozawa S, Takai Y. Role of rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha in regulating plasticity of hippocampal neurotransmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:11587–11592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.21.11587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prigent M, Barlat I, Langen H, Dargemont C. IkappaBalpha and IkappaBalpha /NF-kappa B complexes are retained in the cytoplasm through interaction with a novel partner, RasGAP SH3-binding protein 2. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36441–36449. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004751200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brassard DL, English JM, Malkowski M, Kirschmeier P, Nagabhushan TL, Bishop WR. Inhibitors of farnesyl protein transferase and MEK1,2 induce apoptosis in fibroblasts transformed with farnesylated but not geranylgeranylated H-Ras. Exp Cell Res. 2002;273:138–146. doi: 10.1006/excr.2001.5440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tu JC, Xiao B, Yuan JP, Lanahan AA, Leoffert K, Li M, Linden DJ, Worley PF. Homer binds a novel proline-rich motif and links group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors with IP3 receptors. Neuron. 1998;21:717–726. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80589-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Di Pasquale G, Stacey SN. Adeno-associated virus Rep78 protein interacts with protein kinase A and its homolog PRKX and inhibits CREB-dependent transcriptional activation. J Virol. 1998;72:7916–7925. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.10.7916-7925.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tamura N, Tai Y, Sugimoto K, Kobayashi R, Konishi R, Nishioka M, Masaki T, Nagahata S, Tokuda M. Enhanced expression and activation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;89:1910–1916. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001101)89:9<1910::aid-cncr6>3.3.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mostert V, Dreher I, Köhrle J, Wolff S, Abel J. Modulation of selenoprotein P expression by TGF-beta(1) is mediated by Smad proteins. Biofactors. 2001;14:135–142. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520140118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baron P, Constantin G, Meda L, Scarpini E, Scarlato G, Trinchieri G, Monastra G, Rossi F, Cassatella MA. Cultured human monocytes release proinflammatory cytokines in response to myelin basic protein. Neurosci Lett. 1998;252:151–154. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00497-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Onita T, Ji PG, Xuan JW, Sakai H, Kanetake H, Maxwell PH, Fong GH, Gabril MY, Moussa M, Chin JL. Hypoxia-induced, perinecrotic expression of endothelial Per-ARNT-Sim domain protein-1/hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha correlates with tumor progression, vascularization, and focal macrophage infiltration in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:471–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shen B, Arese M, Gualandris A, Rifkin DB. Intracellular association of FGF-2 with the ribosomal protein L6/TAXREB107. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;252:524–528. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.López-Fernández LA, Párraga M, del Mazo J. Ilf2 is regulated during meiosis and associated to transcriptionally active chromatin. Mech Dev. 2002;111:153–157. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(01)00612-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cao X, Südhof TC. A transcriptionally [correction of transcriptively] active complex of APP with Fe65 and histone acetyltransferase Tip60. Science. 2001;293:115–120. doi: 10.1126/science.1058783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peng H, Begg GE, Harper SL, Friedman JR, Speicher DW, Rauscher FJ. Biochemical analysis of the Kruppel-associated box (KRAB) transcriptional repression domain. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:18000–18010. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001499200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Woods SL, Whitelaw ML. Differential activities of murine single minded 1 (SIM1) and SIM2 on a hypoxic response element. Cross-talk between basic helix-loop-helix/per-Arnt-Sim homology transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10236–10243. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110752200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Teigelkamp S, Mundt C, Achsel T, Will CL, Lührmann R. The human U5 snRNP-specific 100-kD protein is an RS domain-containing, putative RNA helicase with significant homology to the yeast splicing factor Prp28p. RNA. 1997;3:1313–1326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moro F, Sirrenberg C, Schneider HC, Neupert W, Brunner M. The TIM17.23 preprotein translocase of mitochondria: composition and function in protein transport into the matrix. EMBO J. 1999;18:3667–3675. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.13.3667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hiroi Y, Chen R, Sawa H, Hosoda T, Kudoh S, Kobayashi Y, Aburatani H, Nagashima K, Nagai R, Yazaki Y, et al. Cloning of murine glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchor attachment protein, GPAA1. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;279:C205–C212. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.1.C205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hernández MP, Chadli A, Toft DO. HSP40 binding is the first step in the HSP90 chaperoning pathway for the progesterone receptor. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:11873–11881. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111445200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES