Skip to main content
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2015 Mar 9;3(3):apps.1400117. doi: 10.3732/apps.1400117

New microsatellite markers for Campanula pyramidalis (Campanulaceae) and cross-amplification in closely related species1

Ivan Radosavljević 2, Jernej Jakse 3, Zlatko Satovic 4, Branka Javornik 3, Ivana Janković 5, Zlatko Liber 2,6
PMCID: PMC4356320  PMID: 25798343

Abstract

Premise of the study:

Microsatellite markers were identified and characterized to study the genetic diversity and structure, conservation status, taxonomy, and biogeography of subspecific taxa and populations of Campanula pyramidalis (Campanulaceae).

Methods and Results:

Eleven microsatellite markers were developed from genomic libraries enriched for di- and trinucleotide repeats. A total of 80 alleles were observed in the tested natural population. The number of alleles per locus, observed heterozygosity, and expected heterozygosity ranged from four to 13, 0.217 to 0.913, and 0.521 to 0.895, respectively.

Conclusions:

The new microsatellite markers will be useful for studying genetic diversity and structure as well as for better assessing the conservation status of subspecific taxa and populations of C. pyramidalis. Furthermore, a set of seven loci was successfully cross-amplified in C. secundiflora and C. versicolor and will be of great value for addressing unsolved taxonomic and biogeographic issues within the C. pyramidalis species complex.

Keywords: Campanula pyramidalis, Campanulaceae, cross-amplification, microsatellites, simple sequence repeat (SSR)


The Campanula pyramidalis L. species complex (Campanulaceae) is naturally distributed across the Balkan Peninsula and in a small part of the southern Apennines. It is also established in horticulture worldwide. This species complex is usually found in rocky habitats with specific edaphic and microclimatic conditions. Although 21 taxa have been described within the C. pyramidalis complex, only three species have been generally accepted: C. pyramidalis, C. versicolor Sibth. & Sm., and C. secundiflora Vis. & Pančić (Fedorov and Kovanda, 1976; Lammers, 2007; Lakušić et al., 2013). All these taxa have narrow geographic distributions and form phylogenetically closely related groups (Park et al., 2006; Liber et al., 2008; Lakušić et al., 2013).

To elucidate the complicated relationships within this species complex, a broad molecular phylogenetic study based on DNA sequences was performed by Lakušić et al. (2013). Although this work led to many new insights and the description of a new species (C. austroadriatica D. Lakušić & Kovačić), the relationships and evolutionary patterns at the subspecific level remain poorly understood. Our current research focuses on expanding the sampling and developing faster-evolving molecular markers that can discriminate among and within closely related and recently diverged taxa. In accordance with these objectives, 11 new microsatellite markers were developed in the current study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was isolated from 25 mg of silica-dried leaves with the GenElute Plant Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). New microsatellites were identified and characterized from genomic DNA libraries enriched for di- and trinucleotide repeats according to Radosavljević et al. (2011, 2012). Enriched fragments containing microsatellite regions were ligated to the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) followed by transformation of XL-10 Gold Competent Cells (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). After overnight incubation at 37°C, white bacterial colonies were transferred into 384-well plates containing Luria–Bertani (LB) freezing media (LB broth + 13 mM KH2PO4, 6.8 mM (NH4)2SO4, 1.7 mM sodium citrate, 36 mM K2HPO4, 4.4% v/v glycerol). Libraries were transferred onto nylon membranes and screened by Southern hybridization using Cy5-labeled and Cy3-labeled 30-bp oligonucleotides with GA, GT, AGA, ACT, and ATC repeats (Eurofins MWG Operon, Huntsville, Alabama, USA). Positives were detected by scanning the blots using an Ettan DIGE Imager (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA). A total of 192 positive clones were selected from the libraries, and plasmid isolations were performed using Wizard Plus SV Minipreps (Promega Corporation). The plasmids were sequenced from both ends using T7 and SP6 universal PCR primers, BigDye chemistry, and an ABI 3130xL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Geneious 5.6.4 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand; http://www.geneious.com/) was used to edit and assemble the sequences. Microsatellite repeats were localized using MISA Perl script (Thiel et al., 2003). PCR primers flanking the microsatellite repeats were designed for 48 sequences using Primer3 version 4.0 (Untergasser et al., 2012), with the optimum conditions set at a length of 20 bp (18–27 bp), a temperature of 60.0°C (57–63°C), a GC content of 50% (20–80%), and a product size range of 140–210 bp.

A preliminary study using five C. pyramidalis individuals from a natural population from Mt. Velebit (Croatia) (Appendix 1) resulted in the selection of 11 microsatellite loci (Table 1) that were polymorphic, had low levels of stutter bands, and did not yield evidence of nonspecific amplification. These 11 microsatellite loci were subsequently used in a wider analysis using 24 individuals from the same population. The sequences of microsatellite loci were deposited into GenBank (accession no. KF926847–KF926857; Table 1). PCR amplification was performed using a tailed PCR primer approach (Schuelke, 2000) that involved a two-step PCR protocol with an initial touchdown cycle (94°C for 5 min; 5 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C, which was lowered by 1°C in each cycle, and 90 s at 72°C; 25 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 90 s at 72°C; and an 8-min extension step at 72°C). The 20-μL total volume of the PCR mix contained 8 pmol each of reverse and FAM-M13(–21) primers, 2 pmol of the forward primer, 1× PCR buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1 unit TaKaRa Taq Hot Start DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Shiga, Japan), and 5 ng of template DNA. The PCR products were genotyped on an ABI 3730xL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) by the Macrogen DNA service (Seoul, Korea) and analyzed using GeneMapper 4.0 (Applied Biosystems).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 11 new microsatellite markers for Campanula pyramidalis.a

Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′) Repeat motif Allele size range (bp) GenBank accession no.
CpUZ001 F: AAGTATTGGACCCCGAGCTT (ACT)8 130–163 KF926847
R: ATCACCCTAGCCATGCAATC
CpUZ002 F: CCGAATGCACCGTATACTCA (AGA)9 155–167 KF926848
R: AGCAGTAAATTGGACGGTCTG
CpUZ003 F: CCTCTTCCGAATGACGCTTA (GA)12 167–259 KF926849
R: CACTCTTGCTTACACCTTGTGC
CpUZ004 F: GCGAGACTTCTGTGATGTGG (AGA)12 133–181 KF926850
R: TGTGGAGAAATGGACGTTCT
CpUZ005 F: ATGTTTGCCCTTTTCACTGC (GT)12 146–160 KF926851
R: TTGGGATGTTGGAACACAAA
CpUZ006 F: CAGCAATGCAGAAATCGAAA (GT)14 212–228 KF926852
R: AAACCCCTTCCTCCTAAATCA
CpUZ007 F: TGTGGGAGGTTCATTGGTTT (GT)16 200–248 KF926853
R: ACTGCATGCGACAAGATCAA
CpUZ008 F: ATGCAGGGAGCATTGAAGAT (GT)15 196–204 KF926854
R: CCCCAGGAGTCTTTCTCTCC
CpUZ009 F: CAAATTTGAACGGGTTTTCG (GA)19 181–207 KF926855
R: ACTCTTCCCCTCCACATTCC
CpUZ010 F: TCCACCCACCAATAATCTCC (ATC)10 163–199 KF926856
R: ATCCAGAACCCGAAAATTCC
CpUZ011 F: ACACTGCCGATATGTGCGTA (GT)16 220–246 KF926857
R: CCATGTTCGTGTGTAATCATCA
a

A PCR protocol with initial touchdown cycles was used (annealing temperature 55°C).

PowerMarker 3.25 (Liu and Muse, 2005) software was used to calculate the average number of alleles per locus (A), the observed heterozygosity (Ho), and the expected heterozygosity (He) of each microsatellite locus. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium were tested using GENEPOP 3.4 (Raymond and Rousset, 1995). Sequential Bonferroni corrections (Holm, 1979) were applied when conducting multiple statistical tests using SAS 8.02 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). Each locus was evaluated for the presence of null alleles, scoring errors, and allelic dropout using MICRO-CHECKER 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al., 2004).

All 11 loci were polymorphic, with an average of 7.27 alleles per locus, Ho ranging from 0.217 to 0.913, and He from 0.521 to 0.895 (Table 2). Three out of the 11 newly developed microsatellite loci (CpUZ001, CpUZ004, and CpUZ008) showed significant deviations from HWE (Table 2). Deviations from HWE may have been related to the presence of null alleles, although we found no null homozygotes. The null allele frequencies, estimated using Brookfield’s formula (Brookfield, 1996), were 0.178 (CpUZ001), 0.119 (CpUZ004), and 0.267 (CpUZ008). One out of the 55 tests for linkage disequilibrium was significant (P < 0.01) after applying sequential Bonferroni corrections (CpUZ003/CpUZ009).

Table 2.

Genetic properties of the 11 newly developed microsatellites in natural populations of Campanula pyramidalis, C. secundiflora, and C. versicolor.

C. pyramidalis (n = 24) C. secundiflora (n = 24) C. versicolor (n = 24)
Locus A Ho Hea A Ho He A Ho Hea
CpUZ001 5 0.458 0.798* 3 0.136 0.548 3 0.625 0.524
CpUZ002 5 0.478 0.629
CpUZ003 13 0.864 0.870 8 0.714 0.852 6 0.217 0.763***
CpUZ004 8 0.542 0.770** 4 0.833 0.703 5 0.500 0.758*
CpUZ005 7 0.727 0.850 4 0.500 0.521 2 0.167 0.156
CpUZ006 8 0.708 0.790 6 0.792 0.808 5 0.500 0.660
CpUZ007 7 0.454 0.521
CpUZ008 4 0.217 0.686***
CpUZ009 7 0.652 0.857 2 0.227 0.509 4 0.542 0.650
CpUZ010 5 0.409 0.734 5 0.792 0.762 6 0.375 0.607
CpUZ011 11 0.913 0.895

Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals analyzed.

a

Significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after sequential Bonferroni corrections: *** represents significance at the 0.1% nominal level; ** represents significance at the 1% nominal level; * represents significance at the 5% nominal level.

The 11 new microsatellite markers from C. pyramidalis were also tested on 24 individuals from natural populations of the closely related C. secundiflora and C. versicolor (Appendix 1). Seven out of the 11 microsatellite loci were successfully cross-amplified in both species (Table 2). The total number of alleles observed at each locus in C. secundiflora ranged from two to eight, the Ho from 0.136 to 0.833, and the He from 0.509 to 0.852. All loci were in accordance with HWE, and no linkage disequilibrium was detected between any pair of loci. The total number of alleles observed at each locus in C. versicolor ranged from two to six, the Ho from 0.167 to 0.625, and the He from 0.156 to 0.763. Two out of seven loci (CpUZ003 and CpUZ004) deviated from HWE. Based on the results from MICRO-CHECKER, the occurrence of null alleles was suggested for both loci at frequencies of 0.296 (CpUZ003) and 0.136 (CpUZ004). No evidence of linkage disequilibrium was detected across any pairwise comparisons except between CpUZ009 and CpUZ010.

CONCLUSIONS

The 11 new microsatellite markers developed here will be useful for studying genetic diversity and structure as well as for better assessment of the conservation status of subspecific taxa and populations of C. pyramidalis. A set of seven loci was successfully cross-amplified in C. secundiflora and C. versicolor. Because the three species are very closely related, a high level of homoplasy is not likely. We expect these seven microsatellite loci to be of great value in addressing unsolved taxonomic and biogeographic issues in the C. pyramidalis species complex.

Appendix 1.

Voucher information for Campanula species used in this study.

Species Voucher specimen accession no.a Collection locality Geographic coordinates n
C. pyramidalis L. ZA-30825 Mt. Velebit, Croatia 44°20′24.38″N, 15°38′58.76″E 24
C. secundiflora Vis. & Pančić BEOU-25034 Panjica Gorge, Serbia 43°40′04.00″N, 20°05′44.00″E 24
C. versicolor Sibth. & Sm. BEOU-28150 Tempe Vale, Greece 39°52′41.16″N, 22°35′05.64″E 24

Note: n = number of individuals.

a

Herbarium codes: BEOU = Herbarium of the University of Belgrade; ZA = Herbarium Croaticum, University of Zagreb.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Brookfield J. F. Y. 1996. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Molecular Ecology 5: 453–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fedorov A., Kovanda M. 1976. Campanula. In T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters, and D. A. Webb [eds.], Flora Europaea, vol. 4, 74–93. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  3. Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lakušić D., Liber Z., Nikolić T., Surina B., Kovačić S., Bogdanović S., Stefanović S. 2013. Molecular phylogeny of the Campanula pyramidalis species complex (Campanulaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear non-coding sequences and its taxonomic implications. Taxon 62: 505–524. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lammers T. G. 2007. Campanula. In T. G. Lammers , World checklist and bibliography of Campanulaceae, 86–221. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liber Z., Kovačić S., Nikolić T., Likić S., Rusak G. 2008. Relations between western Balkan endemic Campanula L. (Campanulaceae) lineages: Evidence from chloroplast DNA. Plant Biosystems 142: 40–50. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu K., Muse S. V. 2005. PowerMarker: Integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21: 2128–2129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Park J., Kovačić S., Eddie W. M. M., Liber Z., Schneeweiss G. M. 2006. Phylogeny and biogeography of isophyllous species of Campanula (Campanulaceae) in the Mediterranean area. Systematic Botany 31: 862–880. [Google Scholar]
  9. Radosavljević I., Jakse J., Javornik B., Satovic Z., Liber Z. 2011. New microsatellite markers for Salvia officinalis (Lamiaceae) and cross-amplification in closely related species. American Journal of Botany 98: e316–e318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Radosavljević I., Satovic Z., Jakse J., Javornik B., Greguraš D., Jug-Dujaković M., Liber Z. 2012. Development of new microsatellite markers for Salvia officinalis L. and its potential use in conservation-genetic studies of narrow endemic Salvia brachyodon Vandas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13: 12082–12093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Raymond M., Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schuelke M. 2000. An economic method for florescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thiel T., Michalek W., Varshney R. K., Graner A. 2003. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Untergasser A., Cutcutache I., Koressaar T., Ye J., Faircloth B. C., Remm M., Rozen S. G. 2012. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40: e115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van Oosterhout C., Hutchinson W. F., Wills D. P. M., Shipley P. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES